Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99491
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor連勇智zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYung-Chih Lienen
dc.contributor.author楊湘華zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsiang-Hua Yangen
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-10T16:27:07Z-
dc.date.available2025-09-11-
dc.date.copyright2025-09-10-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-07-25-
dc.identifier.citationAl Amosh, H., & Khatib, S. F. (2022). Ownership structure and environmental, social and governance performance disclosure: The moderating role of the board independence. Journal of Business and Socio-Economic Development, 2(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBSED-07-2021-0094
Al Mamun, M., Balachandran, B., & Duong, H. N. (2020). Powerful CEOs and stock price crash risk. Journal of Corporate Finance, 62, 101582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2020.101582
Adams, R. B., Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: A conceptual framework and survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(1), 58–107. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.48.1.58
Ali, A., Chen, T. Y., & Radhakrishnan, S. (2007). Corporate disclosures by family firms. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44(1–2), 238–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.01.006
An, H., & Zhang, T. (2013). Stock price synchronicity, crash risk, and institutional investors. Journal of Corporate Finance, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2013.01.001
Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2004). Board composition: Balancing family influence in S&P 500 firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(2), 209–237. https://doi.org/10.2307/4131472
Barka, Z., Hamza, T., & Mrad, S. (2023). Corporate ESG scores and equity market misvaluation: Toward ethical investor behavior. Economic Modelling, 127, 106467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106467
Bowen, H. R. (2013). Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt20q1w8f
Bushee, B. J. (1998). The influence of institutional investors on myopic R&D investment behavior. The Accounting Review, 73(3), 305–333.
Bushman, R. M., Piotroski, J. D., & Smith, A. J. (2004). What determines corporate transparency? Journal of Accounting Research, 42(2), 207–252. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2004.00136.x
Chaganti, R., & Damanpour, F. (1991). Institutional ownership, capital structure, and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 12(7), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120702
Chau, G. K., & Gray, S. J. (2002). Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 247–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7063(02)00153-X
Chen, C. J., & Jaggi, B. (2000). Association between independent non executive directors, family control and financial disclosures in Hong Kong. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 19(4-5), 285-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-4254(00)00015-6
Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 61(3), 345–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00066-6
Chen, S., Chen, X., & Cheng, Q. (2008). Do family firms provide more or less voluntary disclosure? Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 499–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00288.x
Chen, S., & Fan, M. (2024). ESG ratings and corporate success: analyzing the environmental governance impact on Chinese companies’ performance. Frontiers in Energy Research, 12, 1371616. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2024.1371616
Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Sharma, P. (2005). Trends and directions in the development of a strategic management theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(5), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00098.x
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. The Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2771. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6261.00511
DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (2000). Controlling stockholders and the disciplinary role of corporate payout policy: A study of the Times Mirror Company. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(2), 153–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00039-8
Denis, D. J., Denis, D. K., & Sarin, A. (1997). Agency problems, equity ownership, and corporate diversification. The Journal of Finance, 52(1), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03811.x
Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005
Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Faccio, M., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). The ultimate ownership of Western European Journal of financial economics, 65(3), 365-395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00146-0
Fahlenbrach, R., & Stulz, R. M. (2011). Bank CEO incentives and the credit crisis. Journal of financial economics, 99(1), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.08.010
Fan, P. H. J., & Wong, T. J. (2002). Corporate ownership structure and the informativeness of accounting earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33(3), 401–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00047-2
Fama, E. F., and Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/467037
Feng, M., Li, C., & McVay, S. (2009). Internal control and management guidance. Journal of accounting and economics, 48(2-3), 190-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.004
García‐Sánchez, I. M., & Martínez‐Ferrero, J. (2018). How do independent directors behave with respect to sustainability disclosure? Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(4), 609–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1481
Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K. T., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K. J., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.1.106
Gurol, B., & Lagasio, V. (2023). Women board members’ impact on ESG disclosure with environment and social dimensions: Evidence from the European banking sector. Social Responsibility Journal, 19(1), 211–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-08-2020-0308
Hao, J., Sun, R., Gong, X., & Zhu, X. R. (2025). ESG and stock price crash risk revisited: Evidence from mandatory ESG disclosure policy in China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 91, 102729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2025.102729
Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of cleaner production, 59, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005
Hong, H. G., & Stein, J. C. (1999). Differences of opinion, rational arbitrage, and market crashes. NBER Working Paper.
Hunjra, A. I., Mehmood, R., & Tayachi, T. (2020). How do corporate social responsibility and corporate governance affect stock price crash risk?. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13020030
Hutton, A. P., Marcus, A. J., & Tehranian, H. (2009). Opaque financial reports, R², and crash risk. Journal of Financial Economics, 94(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.10.003
Ilhan, E., Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., & Starks, L. T. (2023). Climate risk disclosure and institutional investors. Review of Financial Studies, 36(7), 2617–2650. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhad002
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Jensen, M. C., & Ruback, R. S. (1983). The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 11(1), 5–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(83)90004-1
Jin, L., & Myers, S. C. (2006). R² around the world: New theory and new tests. Journal of Financial Economics, 79(2), 257–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.11.003
Khan, H. U. R., Khidmat, W. B., Al Hares, O., Awan, S., & Saleem, K. (2022). How do independent directors view carbon information disclosure? Evidence from China. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 853590. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.853590
Kim, J. B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011a). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.07.007
Kim, J. B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011b). CFOs versus CEOs: Equity incentives and crashes. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 713–730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2011.03.013
Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2014.02.013
Kothari, S. P., Shu, S., & Wysocki, P. (2009). Do managers withhold bad news? Journal of Accounting Research, 47(1), 241–276. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2008.00318.x
Kraus, A., & Stoll, H. R. (1972). Price impacts of block trading on the New York Stock Exchange. Journal of Finance, 27, 569–588. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1972.tb00985.x
Krüger, P. (2015). Corporate goodness and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 115(2), 304–329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2014.09.008
Li, L., Francis, B. B., & Hasan, I. (2011). Firms’ real earnings management and subsequent stock price crash risk.  In CAAA Annual conference.
Li, Y., Gong, M., Zhang, X. Y., & Koh, L. (2018). The impact of environmental, social, and governance disclosure on firm value: The role of CEO power. The British accounting review, 50(1), 60-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2017.09.007
Liu, J., Xiong, X., Gao, Y., & Zhang, J. (2023). The impact of institutional investors on ESG: Evidence from China. Accounting & Finance, 63, 2801–2826. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.13011
Ni, K., Zhang, R., Tan, L., & Lai, X. (2024). How ESG enhances corporate competitiveness: Mechanisms and Evidence. Finance Research Letters, 69, 106249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2024.106249
Pound, J. (1988). Proxy contests and the efficiency of shareholder oversight. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(88)90046-3
Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1990). Outside directors, board independence, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 26, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(90)90002-H
Rosenstein, S., & Wyatt, J. G. (1997). Inside directors, board effectiveness, and shareholder wealth. Journal of Financial Economics, 44(2), 229–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00004-4
Seow, R. Y. C. (2025). Environmental, social, and governance reporting in family firms: The critical role of CEO attributes. Business Strategy and the Environment, 34(1), 70-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3984
Shen, H., Lin, H., Han, W., & Wu, H. (2023). ESG in China: A review of practice and research, and future research avenues. China Journal of Accounting Research, 16(4), 100325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjar.2023.100325
Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x
Singhania, M., & Gupta, D. (2024). Impact of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) disclosure on firm risk: A meta‐analytical review. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3573-3613. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2725
Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.12.005
Waldau, R. (2024). A systematic literature review on determinants and outcomes of ESG performance in family firms. Management Review Quarterly, 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-024-00462-9
Wang, D. (2006). Founding family ownership and earnings quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 619–656.   https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2006.00213.x
Wang, J., Ke, Y., Zhang, H., & Cheng, Y. (2023). Which institutional investors can improve the level of corporate ESG information disclosure? PLOS ONE, 18(11), e0290008. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290008
Xu, N., Liu, J., & Dou, H. (2022). Environmental, social, and governance information disclosure and stock price crash risk: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 977369. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.977369
Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of Finance, 2(1‐2), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2443.00014
Zahra, S. A., & Pearce, J. A. (1989). Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: A review and integrated model. Journal of Management, 15(2), 291–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99491-
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在探討家族企業永續資訊揭露透明度與股價暴跌風險之關聯性。隨著全球對永續發展議題的日益重視以及相關國際永續準則陸續發布,企業揭露永續資訊之品質與透明度已成為評估企業永續經營能力的重要指標(Eccles, Ioannou and Serafeim, 2014)。然而,家族企業常見控制權集中與資訊揭露裁量空間較高之特性,易導致資訊不對稱程度升高,影響投資人對企業風險的判斷。本研究以2016年至2023年臺灣上市櫃家族企業為樣本,探討永續資訊揭露透明度與股價暴跌風險之關聯性,並進一步納入公司治理變數,探討其對永續資訊揭露透明度與股價暴跌風險關係之調節效果,包括獨立董事席次、CEO是否為最終控制者與機構投資人持股比例。研究結果顯示,在家族企業樣本中,永續資訊揭露透明度與股價暴跌風險呈顯著負向關聯,惟在非家族企業樣本中該關聯不具顯著性,突顯家族企業治理特性對市場反應機制之影響。進一步分析亦發現,治理變數展現差異化之調節影響:獨立董事席次與機構投資人持股比例可強化永續揭露之市場穩定功能,進一步抑制股價暴跌風險;反之,當CEO同時為最終控制者時,該負向關係顯著減弱,顯示權力高度集中將弱化資訊揭露對市場風險的調節作用。本研究不僅補足臺灣家族企業永續資訊揭露與資本市場風險關聯性之實證研究空白,亦對公司治理實務具有參考價值。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThis study examines the relationship between the transparency of sustainability information disclosure and stock price crash risk in family firms. With the growing global emphasis on sustainability issues and the continual release of international sustainability standards, the quality and transparency of corporate sustainability disclosures have become critical indicators in assessing firms' long-term viability (Eccles, Ioannou and Serafeim, 2014). Family firms, however, often feature concentrated control structures and greater discretion in disclosure, which may exacerbate information asymmetry and increase the likelihood of market overreaction to negative events.
Using data from listed family firms in Taiwan from 2016 to 2023, the empirical results show that sustainability disclosure transparency is negatively associated with stock price crash risk, while this relationship is not significant among non-family firms. The empirical results also show that corporate governance variables moderate this association in divergent ways: a higher proportion of independent directors and greater institutional ownership reinforce the negative relationship, whereas CEO duality weakens it. These results fill a research gap concerning the relationship between sustainability disclosure and market risk in Taiwanese family firms and provide practical implications for corporate governance practices and disclosure regulations in emerging markets.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-10T16:27:07Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-09-10T16:27:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 I
中文摘要 II
Abstract III
目次 IV
表次 V
圖次 VI
第一章 緒論 1
第二章 文獻回顧與假說建立 4
第一節 永續資訊揭露 4
第二節 家族企業與永續資訊揭露透明度 7
第三節 永續資訊揭露與股價暴跌風險 12
第四節 公司治理 15
第三章 研究方法 21
第一節 研究樣本 21
第二節 研究模型 22
第三節 變數定義 27
第四章 實證結果 34
第一節 敘述性統計及相關係數分析 34
第二節 實證結果分析 37
第三節 增額測試 39
第四節 穩健性測試 50
第五章 研究結論與建議 52
第一節 研究結論 52
第二節 研究貢獻 54
第三節 研究限制與建議 55
參考文獻 56
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject永續發展zh_TW
dc.subject家族企業zh_TW
dc.subject公司治理zh_TW
dc.subject股價暴跌風險zh_TW
dc.subject永續資訊揭露透明度zh_TW
dc.subjectSustainability Disclosure Transparencyen
dc.subjectStock Price Crash Risken
dc.subjectCorporate Governanceen
dc.subjectESGen
dc.subjectFamily Firmsen
dc.title家族企業永續資訊揭露透明度與股價暴跌風險關聯性zh_TW
dc.titleThe Relationship Between Sustainability Disclosure Transparency and Stock Price Crash Risk in Family Firmsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee陳厚銘;詹文男;連振廷;譚丹琪zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHo-Min Chen;Wen-Nang Tsan;Chen-Ting Lien;Dan-Chi Tanen
dc.subject.keyword家族企業,永續發展,永續資訊揭露透明度,股價暴跌風險,公司治理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordFamily Firms,ESG,Sustainability Disclosure Transparency,Stock Price Crash Risk,Corporate Governance,en
dc.relation.page64-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202500821-
dc.rights.note未授權-
dc.date.accepted2025-07-29-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學系-
dc.date.embargo-liftN/A-
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.87 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved