請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99383完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳復國 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Fuh-Kuo Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 邱家琪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Chi Chiu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-09-10T16:07:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-09-11 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-09-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | [1] ICCT, (2025). Assessment of automotive steel demand in the United States [Working paper]. Available: https://theicct.org/publication/us-auto-steel-feb24/
[2] Research and Markets, (2024). Ultra-High Strength Steel: Global Strategic Business Report 2024 [Market report]. Available: https://www.researchandmarkets.com [3] WorldAutoSteel, (2020). LCA studies for steel vs aluminium BIW structures [Technical report]. Available: https://www.worldautosteel.org/projects/life-cycle-assessment/ [4] U.S. Steel, (2022). Sustainability Helps Shape Promising Future for Automotive Steel. [Official document] Available: https://www.ussteel.com/media/news/ sustainability-promising-future-automotive-steel [5] P. J. Armstrong, C. O. Frederick, “ A mathematical representation of the multiaxial Bauschinger effect,” CEGB report RD/B/N731. Berkeley Nuclear Laboratories, Dec. 1966. [6] J. L. Chaboche, K. Dang-Van, and G. Cordier, “Modelization of the strain memory effect on the cyclic hardening of 316 stainless steels,” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, SMiRT-5, vol. L11, Berlin, Germany, pp. L11 3, Aug. 1979. [7] J. L. Chaboche, “On the plastic and viscoplastic constitutive equations — part I: rules developed with internal variable concepts,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 153–158, May. 1983. [8] J. L. Chaboche and G. Rousselier, “On the plastic and viscoplastic constitutive equations — part II: application of internal variable concepts to the 316 stainless steel,” Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, vol. 105, no. 2, pp. 159–164, May. 1983. [9] L. Geng, R. H. Wagoner, “Role of plastic anisotropy and its evolution on springback,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 44, pp. 123-148, 2002. [10] P. A. Eggertsen, K. Mattiasson, “On constitutive modeling for springback analysis,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 804-818, Jun. 2010. [11] S. Suttner, M. Merklein,“Characterization of the bauschinger effect and identification of the kinematic chaboche model by tension–compression tests and cyclic shear tests,” Proceedings of the International Deep Drawing Research Group Conference, IDDRG, France, pp. 125–130, 2014. [12] I. Gil, L. Galdos, U. Ulibarri, E. Sáenz de Argandoña, R. Ortubay, E. Silvestre, “Influence of material׳s hardening law in the simulation of DP1000 deep drawing and subsequent springback,” Proceedings of the International Deep Drawing Research Group Conference, IDDRG, pp. 125-132, 2014. [13] F. Yoshida, T. Uemori, K. Fujiwara, “Elastic-plastic behavior of steel sheet under in-plane cyclic tension-compression at large strain,” International Journal of Plasticity, vol. 18, no.5-6, pp. 633–659, Oct. 2002. [14] F. Yoshida and T. Uemori, “A model of large-strain cyclic plasticity describing the Bauschinger effect and workhardening stagnation,” International Journal of Plasticity, vol. 18, no.5-6, pp. 661–686, Oct. 2002. [15] F. Yoshida, “A constitutive model of cyclic plasticity,” International Journal of Plasticity, vol. 16, no. 3-4, pp. 359–380, 2000. [16] F. Yoshida, “Material models for accurate simulation of sheet metal forming and springback,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1252, Pohang, Korea, pp. 71–78, Jun. 2010. [17] F. Yoshida, T. Uemori, “A model of large-strain cyclic plasticity and its application to springback simulation,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 45, no. 10, pp. 1687-1702, Oct. 2003. [18] T. Uemori, T. Okada, F. Yoshida, “Simulation of springback in V-bending process by elasto-plastic finite element method with consideration of Bauschinger effect”, Metals and Materials, vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 311–314, May. 1998. [19] E. Silvestre, J. Mendiguren, L. Galdos, E. Sáenz de Argandoña, “Comparison of the hardening behaviour of different steel families: From mild and stainless steel to advanced high strength steels,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 101-102, pp. 10-20, Oct. 2015. [20] L. Luo, A. K. Ghosh, “Elastic and inelastic recovery after plastic deformation of DQSK steel sheet,” Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, vol. 125, no. 3, pp. 237-246, Jul. 2003. [21] S. Sumikawa, A. Ishiwatari, J, Hiramoto, “Improvement of springback prediction accuracy by considering nonlinear elastoplastic behavior after stress reversal,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol.241, pp. 46-53, Mar. 2017. [22] D. Kim, M. Lee, C. Kim, M. L. Wenner, R. H. Wagoner, F. Barlat, “Measurements of anisotropic yielding, bauschinger and transient behavior of automotive dual-Phase Steel Sheets,” METALS AND MATERIALS International, vol. 9, no. 6, pp. 561-570, Dec. 2003. [23] A. Ghaei, D. E. Green, “Numerical implementation of Yoshida-Uemori two-surface plasticity model using a fully implicit integration scheme,” Computational Materials Science, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 195-205, Mar. 2010. [24] S. L. Zang, C. Guo, S. Thuillier, M. G. Lee, “A model of one-surface cyclic plasticity and its application to springback prediction,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 425-435, Jun. 2011. [25] K. Mori, K. Akita, Y. Abe, “Springback behavior in bending of ultra-high-strength steel sheets using CNC servo press”, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 321-325, Feb. 2007. [26] 蘇昱竹,《先進高強度鋼板沖壓成形回彈現象之研究》, 國立台灣大學機械工程研究所碩士論文, 2007。 [27] J. Y. Lee, J. W. Lee, M. G. Lee, F. Barlat, “An application of homogeneous anisotropic hardening to springback prediction in pre-strained U-draw/bending,” International Journal of Solids and Structures, vol. 49, no. 25, pp. 3562-3572, Dec. 2012 [28] Y. Utsumi, A. Shiraki, S. Hamamoto, J. Kinugasa, “Martensitic steel sheets of 1300 and 1500MPa grades,” Kobelco Technology Review, no. 35, Jun. 2017. [29] Z. Wei, J. Cao, J. Cheng, X. Wang, H. Zhu, X. Zhu, R. Zhao, “Precise local deformation control for UHSS thin-walled component in roll forming,” Journal of Manufacturing Processes, vol. 112, pp. 302-312, Jan. 2024. [30] E. Billur, T. Altan, “Challenges in forming advanced high strength steels,” Proceedings of New Developments in Sheet Metal Forming, Fellbach, Germany, pp. 285–304, May. 2012. [31] SSAB, (2024).Cold stamping 1500 and 1700 MPa automotive steels [Online]. Available:https://www.ssab.com/en/brands-and-products/docol/automotive-steel-resources/automotive-insights/cold-stamping-1500-and-1700-mpa-automotive-steels [32] K. Y. Kim, E. H. Lee, S. H. Park, “An infrared local-heat-assisted cold stamping process for martensitic steel and application to an auto part,” Metals, vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 1543, Nov. 2020. [33] H. Miyake, T. Shinmiya, Y. Yamasaki, “Design technology of preforming shape to suppress forming defects in curved-hat-shape parts,” Journal of the Japan Society for Technology of Plasticity, vol. 62, no. 723, pp. 48-53, Apr. 2021. [34] S. W. Nam, G. H. Bae, “Study on the cold stamping process design method of 1.5GPa grade front side rear lower member,” Transactions of Materials Processing, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 236-241, Oct. 2021. [35] H. Katsuma, “Development of a novel forming method to restrain wall curvature for stamping products using general purpose ultra-high tensile strength steel sheets,” Transactions of the JSME, vol. 89, no. 927, pp. 23-65, Oct. 2023. [36] S. H. Kwon, H. S. Lee, Y.S. Lee, “Compensation design to reduce springback in sheet metal forming of 1.2GPa ultra high strength steel,” Transactions of Materials Processing, vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 301-305, Oct. 2016. [37] J. Hardell, B. Prakash, K. Steinhoff, “High temperature tribological studies on surface engineered tool steel and high strength boron steel,” Steel Research International, vol. 80, no. 9, pp. 665-670, 2009. [38] 蔡恒光,《先進高強度鋼板反覆拉壓與雙軸拉伸變形特性之研究》, 國立台灣大學機械工程研究所博士論文,2012。 [39] 魏華佐,《先進高強度鋼板沖壓成形扭曲現象之研究》,國立台灣大學機械工程研究所碩士論文,2010。 [40] J. Lee, H. J. Bong, J. HA, J. Choi, F. Barlat, M. G. Lee, “Influence of yield stress determination in anisotropic hardening model on springback prediction in dual-phase steel,” Journal of the Minerals, Metals & Materials Society, vol. 70, no. 8, pp. 1560-1566, 2018. [41] NUMISHEET’93, in Proc. The Second International Conference of Numerical Simulation of 3- D sheet Metal Forming Processes, Isehara, Japan, 1993. [42] 林建維,《鋁合金板件沖壓成形之研究》,國立台灣大學機械工程研究所碩士論文,2011。 [43] W. F. Hosford, W. A. Backofen, Metal Forming: Mechanics and Metallurgy, 3rd ed. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 208, 2007. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99383 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著全球對節能減碳的重視與汽車輕量化趨勢的推進,超高強度鋼(Ultra High Strength Steel, UHSS)因具備高強度、良好的耐碰撞性能與相對低成本的優勢,已廣泛應用於車體結構件的製造。然而,UHSS在冷沖壓成形過程中,常因伸長率不足而產生破裂問題,同時亦因高強度特性導致回彈顯著,進一步增加模具設計與成品精度控制之難度。為解決上述問題,學術界與產業界普遍導入有限元素分析(Finite Element Analysis, FEA)技術,藉由模擬預測成形缺陷,進行模具幾何與製程參數之優化,以提升成形品質與尺寸穩定性,並有效降低試模次數與生產成本。
為深入瞭解超高強度鋼冷沖壓成形行為,本論文首先透過材料性質實驗,比較MS 1300、MS 1500_A、MS 1500_B及MS 1700四種超高強度鋼之基本成形特性。此外,為提升超高強度鋼於冷沖壓成形之回彈預測能力,建立固定式治具以進行反覆拉伸與壓縮實驗,進而建構考慮包辛格效應(Bauschinger Effect)之Yoshida-Uemori材料模型,並發現對於降伏比值較高之鋼材,適度調整模型參數Y,可更準確描述材料之實際變形行為,並提升回彈預測準確度。 應用上述所建立之材料模型,本論文建立V-shape、U-shape 及 U-hat-shape三種具代表性之基礎載具模型,分析四種鋼材於不同成形模式下之減薄與回彈行為,探討其成形性差異。此外,亦進一步分析材料參數對成形性的影響,發現r值≥ 1、0.6≤降伏比≤0.7使得材料有較佳之抗減薄能力。同時針對幾何參數變化進行模擬分析,其中板厚1.6mm之MS 1500_B於 U-hat 引伸成形中,當母模圓角為 3 mm 時易產生破裂,因此未來於模具幾何參數設計建議母模圓角尺寸不小於 4 mm。 本論文所建立之材料模型、模擬分析與實驗驗證結果,不僅可作為超高強度鋼冷沖壓製程開發之依據,亦具備應用於新鋼種評估與模具設計優化之參考價值。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | With the global emphasis on energy conservation and carbon reduction, along with the ongoing trend toward vehicle lightweighting, ultra high strength steels (UHSS) have been widely adopted in the manufacturing of automotive structural components due to their high strength, excellent crash resistance, and relatively low cost. However, in cold stamping processes, UHSS often suffers from poor elongation, leading to fracture issues. Additionally, their high strength characteristics result in significant springback, increasing the difficulty of die design and dimensional control. To address these challenges, both academia and industry have widely adopted finite element analysis (FEA) to predict forming defects, optimize die geometry and process parameters, enhance forming quality and dimensional stability, and reduce tryout iterations and production costs.
To better understand the cold stamping behavior of UHSS, this study first conducted material characterization tests on four UHSS grades: MS 1300, MS 1500_A, MS 1500_B, and MS 1700, to compare their fundamental forming properties. In order to improve the prediction accuracy of springback behavior, a fixed fixture was developed to perform repeated tension-compression tests. Based on the results, a Yoshida–Uemori (Y-U) material model capable of capturing the Bauschinger effect was constructed. The study also found that, for steels with a high yield ratio, appropriate adjustment of the Y parameter in the model enables better prediction of the actual deformation behavior and improves springback accuracy. Using the developed material models, this study further established three representative benchmark forming geometries—V-shape, U-shape, and U-hat-shape—to analyze the thinning and springback behavior of the four UHSS grades under different forming modes. The influence of material parameters on formability was also investigated, showing that materials with an r-value ≥ 1 and a yield ratio between 0.6 and 0.7 exhibited better resistance to thinning. Additionally, geometric sensitivity analysis revealed that MS 1500_B with a sheet thickness of 1.6 mm is prone to fracture during U-hat stretch forming when the die radius is 3 mm. Therefore, it is recommended that the die radius be no less than 4 mm in future die designs. The developed material models, simulation results, and experimental validations presented in this study not only serve as a basis for UHSS cold stamping process development but also provide valuable references for the evaluation of new steel grades and the optimization of die design. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-09-10T16:07:10Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-09-10T16:07:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
摘要 iii Abstract v 目次 vii 圖次 xi 表次 xvii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景及目的 1 1.2 研究方法與步驟 4 1.3 文獻回顧 5 1.4 論文總覽 9 第二章 超高強度鋼材料性質之研究 11 2.1 超高強度鋼之單軸拉伸實驗 11 2.1.1 單軸拉伸實驗規劃 11 2.1.2 單軸拉伸實驗結果 14 2.2 超高強度鋼之摩擦實驗 16 2.2.1 摩擦實驗規劃 16 2.2.2 摩擦實驗結果 18 2.3 四種超高強度鋼材料特性討論與比較 19 第三章 四種超高強度鋼板之材料模型建立 21 3.1 Hill48降伏準則 21 3.2 加工硬化準則之探討 24 3.2.1 等向加工硬化準則 24 3.2.2 動態加工硬化準則 26 3.2.3 混合加工硬化準則 27 3.2.4 Yoshida-Uemori材料模型之加工硬化模式 28 3.3 Yoshida-Uemori (Y-U model) 材料模型之研究 31 3.3.1 超高強度鋼板之包辛格效應 31 3.3.2 超高強度鋼板之反覆拉伸與壓縮實驗 32 3.3.3 超高強度鋼板之包辛格指數 40 3.4 Y-U model材料參數之探討 42 3.4.1 Y-U model 拉伸段參數之探討 43 3.4.2 Y-U model 卸載段參數之探討 44 3.4.3 Y-U model 卸載與壓縮段參數之探討 46 3.4.4 其餘參數之探討 50 3.5 Y-U model材料參數修正 52 3.5.1 材料模型之不同降伏應力探討 52 3.5.2 不同案例之驗證與比較 53 3.6 四種超高強度鋼板之Y-U材料模型建立 57 3.6.1 四種超高強度鋼之Y-U model參數 57 3.6.2 材料曲線之驗證與比較 58 3.6.3 不同加工硬化準則之材料模型比較 60 第四章 基礎載具之有限元素模擬分析與實驗驗證 63 4.1 模擬參數之收斂性分析 64 4.1.1 板材網格尺寸 65 4.1.2 模具網格尺寸 66 4.1.3 模面圓角網格尺寸 67 4.1.4 積分點數目 68 4.1.5 沖壓速度 69 4.1.6 CAE模擬分析模式之建立 70 4.2 V型彎曲成形 71 4.2.1 模型建立與回彈定義介紹 71 4.2.2 變形機制與回彈機制探討 73 4.2.3 模擬結果與實驗驗證 75 4.2.3.1 四種超高強度鋼之模擬與實驗結果 77 4.2.3.2 不同降伏應力之模擬與實驗結果 78 4.3 U型彎曲成形 81 4.3.1 模型建立與回彈定義介紹 81 4.3.2 變形機制與回彈機制探討 83 4.3.3 模擬結果與實驗驗證 86 4.3.3.1 四種超高強度鋼之模擬與實驗結果 88 4.3.3.2 不同降伏應力之模擬與實驗結果 89 4.4 U型帽狀引伸成形 92 4.4.1 模型建立與回彈定義介紹 92 4.4.2 變形機制與回彈機制探討 96 4.4.3 模擬結果與實驗驗證 99 4.4.3.1 四種超高強度鋼之模擬與實驗結果 101 4.4.3.2 不同降伏應力之模擬與實驗結果 103 第五章 超高強度鋼板之冷沖壓成形特性研究 106 5.1 材料特性對成形性之影響 106 5.1.1 加工硬化指數(n)對成形性之影響 106 5.1.2 塑性應變比值(r)對成形性之影響 109 5.1.3 降伏比對成形性之影響 111 5.2 Y-U model材料參數對成形性之影響 116 5.2.1 楊氏係數收斂速度ξ對成形性之探討 116 5.2.2 楊氏係數穩態值Ea對回彈之探討 117 5.3 四種超高強度鋼之破裂缺陷分析 119 5.3.1 四種超高強度鋼板之減薄率分析與比較 119 5.3.2 四種超高強度鋼板之應變分佈圖分析與比較 120 5.4 四種超高強度鋼之回彈分析 122 5.5 超高強度鋼於簡易造型之冷沖壓成形可行性評估 126 5.5.1 深寬比對減薄率之影響 126 5.5.2 沖頭圓角對減薄率之影響 128 5.5.3 母模圓角對減薄率之影響 130 第六章 結論 133 參考文獻 134 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 包辛格效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 超高強度鋼板 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Yoshida-Uemori材料模型 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 沖壓成形 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 有限元素法分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Yoshida-Uemori Material Model | en |
| dc.subject | Ultra High Strength Steel | en |
| dc.subject | Bauschinger Effect | en |
| dc.subject | Finite Element Analysis | en |
| dc.subject | Stamping | en |
| dc.title | 超高強度鋼冷沖壓成形特性分析之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Analysis of Cold Stamping Formability Characteristics of Ultra High Strength Steels | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃永茂;洪景華;許進忠;林恒勝 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yeong-Maw Hwang;Ching-Hua Hung;Jinn-Jong Sheu;Heng-Sheng Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 超高強度鋼板,Yoshida-Uemori材料模型,沖壓成形,有限元素法分析,包辛格效應, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Ultra High Strength Steel,Yoshida-Uemori Material Model,Stamping,Finite Element Analysis,Bauschinger Effect, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 138 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503434 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 機械工程學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2027-08-31 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 機械工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 8.62 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
