請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99265完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林明仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Jen Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 徐湘羚 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsiang-Ling Hsu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-21T17:02:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-22 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-21 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abendroth, A. K., Huffman, M. L., & Treas, J. (2014). The parity penalty in life course perspective: Motherhood and occupational status in 13 European countries. American Sociological Review, 79(5), 993-1014.
Aisenbrey, S., Evertsson, M., & Grunow, D. (2009). Is there a career penalty for mothers' time out? A comparison of Germany, Sweden and the United States. Social forces, 88(2), 573-605. Altonji, J. G., & Blank, R. M. (1999). Race and gender in the labor market. Handbook of labor economics, 3, 3143-3259. Anderson, D. J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2002). The motherhood wage penalty: Which mothers pay it and why?. American economic review, 92(2), 354-358. Anderson, D. J., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2003). The motherhood wage penalty revisited: Experience, heterogeneity, work effort, and work-schedule flexibility. ILR Review, 56(2), 273-294. Angelov, N., Johansson, P., & Lindahl, E. (2016). Parenthood and the gender gap in pay. Journal of labor economics, 34(3), 545-579. Angrist, J., & Evans, W. N. (1996). Children and their parents' labor supply: Evidence from exogenous variation in family size. Axelrad, H., Sabbath, E. L., & Hawkins, S. S. (2018). The 2008–2009 Great Recession and employment outcomes among older workers. European Journal of Ageing, 15, 35-45. Azmat, G., & Ferrer, R. (2017). Gender gaps in performance: Evidence from young lawyers. Journal of Political Economy, 125(5), 1306-1355. Bayard, K., Hellerstein, J., Neumark, D., & Troske, K. (2003). New evidence on sex segregation and sex differences in wages from matched employee-employer data. Journal of labor Economics, 21(4), 887-922. Becker, G. S. (1981). Altruism in the Family and Selfishness in the Market Place. Economica, 48(189), 1-15. Bertrand, M., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2010). Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. American economic journal: applied economics, 2(3), 228-255. Bertrand, M., Kamenica, E., & Pan, J. (2015). Gender identity and relative income within households. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(2), 571-614. Blackburn, M. L., Bloom, D. E., & Neumark, D. (1993). Fertility timing, wages, and human capital. Journal of Population Economics, 6(1), 1-30. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2006). The US gender pay gap in the 1990s: Slowing convergence. Ilr Review, 60(1), 45-66. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of economic literature, 55(3), 789-865. Bramoullé, Y., Djebbari, H., & Fortin, B. (2009). Identification of peer effects through social networks. Journal of econometrics, 150(1), 41-55. Brown, J. R., Ivković, Z., Smith, P. A., & Weisbenner, S. (2008). Neighbors matter: Causal community effects and stock market participation. The Journal of Finance, 63(3), 1509-1531. Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American sociological review, 204-225. Bursztyn, L., Ederer, F., Ferman, B., & Yuchtman, N. (2014). Understanding mechanisms underlying peer effects: Evidence from a field experiment on financial decisions. Econometrica, 82(4), 1273-1301. Byker, T. (2016). The opt-out continuation: Education, work, and motherhood from 1984 to 2012. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(4), 34-70. Calvó-Armengol, A., Patacchini, E., & Zenou, Y. (2009). Peer effects and social networks in education. The review of economic studies, 76(4), 1239-1267. Chung, Y., Downs, B., Sandler, D. H., & Sienkiewicz, R. (2017). The parental gender earnings gap in the United States (No. 17-68). Cockx, B., & Picchio, M. (2013). Scarring effects of remaining unemployed for long-term unemployed school-leavers. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 176(4), 951-980. Correll Shelley, J., Stephen, B., & In, P. (2007). Getting a Job: Is There a Motherhood Penalty?. American Journal of Sociology, 112(5), 1297-1338. Dahlin, E., Kelly, E., & Moen, P. (2008). Is work the new neighborhood? Social ties in the workplace, family, and neighborhood. The Sociological Quarterly, 49(4), 719-736. Daniel, F. K., Lacuesta, A., & Rodríguez-Planas, N. (2013). The motherhood earnings dip: Evidence from administrative records. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 169-197. De Giorgi, G., Frederiksen, A., & Pistaferri, L. (2020). Consumption network effects. The Review of Economic Studies, 87(1), 130-163. De Paula, A. (2017, November). Econometrics of network models. In Advances in economics and econometrics: Theory and applications, eleventh world congress (pp. 268-323). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DeMarzo, P. M., Kaniel, R., & Kremer, I. (2004). Diversification as a public good: Community effects in portfolio choice. The Journal of Finance, 59(4), 1677-1716. Diamond, P. A. (2013). Cyclical unemployment, structural unemployment (No. w18761). National Bureau of Economic Research. England, P. (2005). Gender inequality in labor markets: The role of motherhood and segregation. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 12(2), 264-288. England, P., Bearak, J., Budig, M. J., & Hodges, M. J. (2016). Do highly paid, highly skilled women experience the largest motherhood penalty?. American sociological review, 81(6), 1161-1189. Filomena, M. (2023). Unemployment scarring effects: An overview and meta-analysis of empirical studies. Italian Economic Journal, 1-60. Fitzenberger, B., Sommerfeld, K., & Steffes, S. (2013). Causal effects on employment after first birth—A dynamic treatment approach. Labor Economics, 25, 49-62. Gangl, M., & Ziefle, A. (2009). Motherhood, labor force behavior, and women’s careers: An empirical assessment of the wage penalty for motherhood in Britain, Germany, and the United States. Demography, 46, 341-369. Georgarakos, D., Haliassos, M., & Pasini, G. (2014). Household debt and social interactions. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(5), 1404-1433. Glauber, R. (2018). Trends in the motherhood wage penalty and fatherhood wage premium for low, middle, and high earners. Demography, 55(5), 1663-1680. Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women's employment, education, and family. American economic review, 96(2), 1-21. Goldin, C. (2014). A grand gender convergence: Its last chapter. American economic review, 104(4), 1091-1119. Goldin, C., & Katz, L. F. (2016). A most egalitarian profession: pharmacy and the evolution of a family-friendly occupation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(3), 705-746. Goldin, C., Katz, L. F., & Kuziemko, I. (2006). The homecoming of American college women: The reversal of the college gender gap. Journal of Economic perspectives, 20(4), 133-156. Haliassos, M., & Michaelides, A. Opportunities and Challenges in Eliminating Borders. Capital Markets Union and Beyond, 113. Hill, M. S. (1979). The wage effects of marital status and children. Journal of Human Resources, 579-594. Holzer, H. J. (1988). Search method use by unemployed youth. Journal of labor economics, 6(1), 1-20. Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Stein, J. C. (2004). Social interaction and stock‐market participation. The journal of finance, 59(1), 137-163. Hotchkiss, J. L., Pitts, M. M., & Walker, M. B. (2017). Impact of first birth career interruption on earnings: evidence from administrative data. Applied Economics, 49(35), 3509-3522. Hotz, V. J., Klerman, J. A., & Willis, R. J. (1997). The economics of fertility in developed countries. Handbook of population and family economics, 1, 275-347. Hvide, H. K., & Östberg, P. (2015). Social interaction at work. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(3), 628-652. Jacobsen, J. P., & Levin, L. M. (1995). Effects of intermittent labor force attachment on women's earnings. Monthly Lab. Rev., 118, 14. Juhn, C., & McCue, K. (2017). Specialization then and now: Marriage, children, and the gender earnings gap across cohorts. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(1), 183-204. Kaustia, M., & Knüpfer, S. (2012). Peer performance and stock market entry. Journal of Financial Economics, 104(2), 321-338. Killewald, A. (2013). A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: Marriage, coresidence, biology, and fathers’ wages. American sociological review, 78(1), 96-116. Kim, S. D., & Moser, P. (2021). Women in science. Lessons from the baby boom (No. w29436). National Bureau of Economic Research. Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Leite-Mariante, G. (2023). The child penalty atlas (No. w31649). National Bureau of Economic Research. Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Søgaard, J. E. (2019). Children and gender inequality: Evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(4), 181-209. Knüpfer, S., Rantapuska, E., & Sarvimäki, M. (2023). Social interaction in the family: Evidence from investors’ security holdings. Review of Finance, 27(4), 1297-1327. Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1991). Does marriage really make men more productive?. Journal of Human resources, 282-307. Kroft, K., Lange, F., & Notowidigdo, M. J. (2019). Long-term unemployment and the great recession. NBER Reporter, (3), 18-22. Kühhirt, M. (2012). Childbirth and the long-term division of labor within couples: How do substitution, bargaining power, and norms affect parents’ time allocation in West Germany?. European sociological review, 28(5), 565-582. Kuziemko, I., Pan, J., Shen, J., & Washington, E. (2018). The mommy effect: Do women anticipate the employment effects of motherhood? (No. w24740). National Bureau of Economic Research. Li, G. (2014). Information sharing and stock market participation: Evidence from extended families. Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(1), 151-160. Lin, X. (2010). Identifying peer effects in student academic achievement by spatial autoregressive models with group unobservables. Journal of Labor Economics, 28(4), 825-860. Liu, X., & Lee, L. F. (2010). GMM estimation of social interaction models with centrality. Journal of Econometrics, 159(1), 99-115. Loughran, D. S., & Zissimopoulos, J. M. (2009). Why wait?: the effect of marriage and childbearing on the wages of men and women. Journal of Human resources, 44(2), 326-349. Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2000). Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labor Economics, 7(6), 689-710. Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. The review of economic studies, 60(3), 531-542. Maturana, G., & Nickerson, J. (2019). Teachers teaching teachers: The role of workplace peer effects in financial decisions. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(10), 3920-3957. McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology, 27(1), 415-444. Moffitt, R. (1984). Optimal life-cycle profiles of fertility and labor supply. Research in population economics, 5, 29-50. Musick, K., Gonalons-Pons, P., Schwartz, C., & Griffin, L. (2016). Trends in couples’ work patterns after childbirth: Evidence from the SIPP and administrative earnings. In annual meeting of the American Sociological Association, Seattle, WA. OECD. (2012). How does education affect employment rates?. Education at a Glance 2012: Highlights, 30-31. Olivetti, C., & Petrongolo, B. (2016). The evolution of gender gaps in industrialized countries. Annual review of Economics, 8, 405-434. Ouimet, P., & Tate, G. (2020). Learning from coworkers: Peer effects on individual investment decisions. The Journal of Finance, 75(1), 133-172. Ouimet, Paige, & Tate, Geoffrey. 2019. Learning from coworkers: Peer effects on indi- vidual investment decisions. The Journal of Finance. Oyer, P., Schaefer, S., Bloom, N., Van Reenen, J., MacLeod, W. B., Bertrand, M., ... & Currie, J. (2011). Handbook of labor economics. ed. Orley Ashenfelter and David Card, Chapter Personnel Economics: Hiring and Incentives. Elsevier. Pal, I., & Waldfogel, J. (2016). The family gap in pay: New evidence for 1967 to 2013. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(4), 104-127. Pedersen, L. H. (2022). Game on: Social networks and markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 146(3), 1097-1119. Romero, D. M., Uzzi, B., & Kleinberg, J. (2019). Social networks under stress: Specialized team roles and their communication structure. ACM Transactions on the Web (TWEB), 13(1), 1-24. Sacerdote, B. (2001). Peer effects with random assignment: Results for Dartmouth roommates. The Quarterly journal of economics, 116(2), 681-704. Sasser, A. C. (2005). Gender differences in physician pay: Tradeoffs between career and family. Journal of human resources, 40(2), 477-504. Schaller, J. (2016). Booms, busts, and fertility: Testing the Becker model using gender-specific labor demand. Journal of Human Resources, 51(1), 1-29. Schmieder, J. F., Von Wachter, T., & Bender, S. (2013). The causal effect of unemployment duration on wages: Evidence from unemployment insurance extensions (No. w19772). National Bureau of Economic Research. Stolper, O., & Walter, A. (2019). Birds of a feather: The impact of homophily on the propensity to follow financial advice. The Review of Financial Studies, 32(2), 524-563. Van Zon, S. K., Reijneveld, S. A., Mendes de Leon, C. F., & Bültmann, U. (2017). The impact of low education and poor health on unemployment varies by work life stage. International journal of public health, 62, 997-1006. Waldfogel, J. (1997). The effect of children on women's wages. American sociological review, 209-217. Weisshaar, K. (2018). From opt out to blocked out: The challenges for labor market re-entry after family-related employment lapses. American Sociological Review, 83(1), 34-60. Wilde, E. T., Batchelder, L., & Ellwood, D. T. (2010). The mommy track divides: The impact of childbearing on wages of women of differing skill levels (No. w16582). National Bureau of Economic Research. Zhang, A. C., Fang, J., Jacobsen, B., & Marshall, B. R. (2018). Peer effects, personal characteristics and asset allocation. Journal of Banking & Finance, 90, 76-95. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99265 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究進行了三篇實證研究,運用事件研究法、工具變數方法與行政資料評估養育子女對家庭內性別差距的影響,家戶的投資行為是否受到同儕的影響以及2008 年金融危機對勞動市場結果的影響。
第一篇利用臺灣的行政資料以及事件研究法,探討養育子女對家庭內性別差距的影響,關注勞動所得與財富的變化。運用分位迴歸分析,以檢視依家庭於生育前的所得能力或財富狀況所呈現的異質性效果。初步結果顯示,在第一胎出生後,夫妻間的勞動所得差距擴大 192 個百分點,而財富則下降 28.7 個百分點。具備較佳收入能力或財富水準的母親,生育所遭受的經濟衝擊相對較小。受教育程度較高、初產年齡較晚或總生育數較少的女性,在所得與財富上的性別差距亦相對較小。子女的到來往往促使父親增加勞動投入,而母親則因照護責任而傾向減少勞動市場參與,從而擴大性別差距。在臺灣,無論收入與財富層級高低,父親在第一胎出生後均展現出更積極的勞動市場參與,此現象凸顯華人社會的特殊性。研究亦發現部分模式可能反映文化規範,許多臺灣家庭在子女出生後,會將更多財產登記於妻子名下,作為對女性孕育與照護勞動的補償或肯認。值得注意的是,若第一胎為男嬰,該現象更為明顯,顯示臺灣社會中或許存在「重男」的偏好的存在。具體而言,第一胎為男嬰的母親,獲得不動產的機率較生女嬰者高出6%。 第二篇旨在檢驗個體投資行為是否受到同儕影響,並探討此同儕效應的異質性。我們特別關注性別,如男性與女性在同儕影響下所受程度是否不同,與階層,如資深同事是否較資淺同事更具影響力等因素。本文利用行政資料,並採用一套創新的識別策略,以估計家庭所受到的同儕效應。據我們所知,本研究為首篇區分丈夫與妻子同事對家庭投資決策影響的研究。研究結果顯示,職場同儕對家庭投資行為具有顯著影響,且妻子同事的作用強於丈夫同事。此外,資深同事對夫妻雙方皆有更大影響,凸顯了經驗與財務素養在同儕驅動的投資行為中所扮演的重要角色。 第三篇探討 2008 年金融危機對勞動市場結果的影響,並分析教育程度、性別、婚姻狀況、子女數與年齡等因素對勞動參與上的影響。研究結果顯示,受教育程度較高者顯著較不易處於無工作狀態,性別差異亦相當明顯,男性陷入無工作狀態的可能性顯著較低,而婚姻與育兒則大幅提高女性無工作的機率,反映出女性在勞動市場參與上的結構性限制。年齡較高者,特別是 50 歲以上族群,更容易退出就業。雖然原先假設金融危機對年長男性的衝擊最為顯著,但實證結果並未達統計顯著水準。有趣的是,金融危機期間女性的無工作比例反而下降,可能由於家庭財務壓力促使女性增加勞動供給,加上女性教育程度持續提升所致。整體而言,本研究凸顯金融危機的非對稱性影響,研究結果不如預期,可能原因為產異質性與觀察期間過長,掩蓋部分弱勢群體所面臨的風險。本文強調制定針對性的勞動市場政策之必要,包括提升教育機會、促進性別平等與保障收入安全。未來研究將進一步探討家庭對收入衝擊的因應機制,以及其對家庭動態的更廣泛影響。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation presents three empirical studies using event-study methods, instrumental variables, and administrative data to examine the impact of childbearing on household gender disparities, peer effects on investment behavior, and the 2008 financial crisis on labor market outcomes.
Chapter 1 Using Taiwan's administrative data, our study investigates how raising children impacts gender gaps within households, focusing on labor income and wealth. We employ quantile regression to explore heterogeneous effects based on household earning capacity or wealth status before children. Preliminary findings reveal that with the birth of their first child, the husband-wife labor income gap widens by 192 percentage points, and wealth declines by 28.7 percentage points. Mothers with better earnings capability or wealth face fewer economic setbacks from childbearing than those with lower resources. Gender gaps in income and wealth are less pronounced among women with higher education, older age at first childbirth, or fewer total births. The arrival of children often motivates fathers to increase work efforts, while mothers tend to reduce their labor market participation for caregiving, thereby widening gender gaps. After the first child's birth in Taiwan, fathers across all income and wealth levels become more active in the labor market, possibly unique to Chinese communities. This study also uncovers notable patterns that may reflect underlying cultural norms. As a form of compensation or reward for the physical and emotional labor women undertake during pregnancy and childcare, many Taiwanese households increase the share of assets registered under the wife's name following the birth of a child. This practice suggests a broad societal acceptance and recognition of traditional gender roles. Interestingly, the phenomenon becomes more pronounced when the firstborn child is a son, indicating the persistence of son preference in Taiwanese society. Specifically, mothers of firstborn sons are 6% more likely to obtain real estate than mothers of firstborn daughters. Chapter 2 aims to examine whether individuals’ investment behavior is influenced by their peers and to explore the heterogeneity of these peer effects. Specifically, we investigate whether factors such as gender (e.g., males and females experiencing different levels of peer influence) or hierarchy (e.g., senior co-workers exerting greater influence than junior co-workers) shape the extent of peer effects. Using administrative data, we adopt a novel identification strategy to estimate peer effects within households. To our knowledge, this is the first study to distinguish between the influence of the husband’s and the wife’s colleagues on household investment decisions. We find that workplace peers significantly influence household investment behavior, with the wife’s colleagues exerting a stronger effect than the husband’s. Moreover, senior colleagues have a greater impact on both spouses, underscoring the importance of experience and financial sophistication in peer-driven investment dynamics. Chapter 3 analyzes the impact of the 2008 financial crisis on labor market outcomes, considering education, gender, marital status, parenthood, and age. Higher education is associated with a lower likelihood of being out of employment. Gender disparities are evident as men face lower risks while marriage and childcare increase women’s likelihood of not being employed. Older individuals, particularly those over 50, are more vulnerable. Contrary to expectations, older men were not significantly affected, while women’s non-employment declined during the crisis, likely due to financial pressures and rising education levels. These findings highlight the asymmetric effects of the crisis and suggest that industry-level heterogeneity and the extended observation window may obscure certain vulnerabilities. Future research will further examine household-level responses to income shocks and their broader implications for family dynamics. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-21T17:02:37Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-21T17:02:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | Acknowledgment i
摘要 iii Abstract v Contents viii List of Figures xi List of Tables xiii 1 Motherhood Penalty and Son Preference in Taiwan 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 The Gender Gap 10 1.3 Data and Descriptive Statistics 11 1.3.1 Data 11 1.3.2 Descriptive Statistics 12 1.3.3 Graphical Evidence 12 1.4 Empirical Strategy 14 1.5 Main Results 16 1.5.1 The Average Income Effect of Parenthood 17 1.5.2 The Average Wealth Effect of Parenthood 18 1.5.3 Variations among Family Characteristics 19 1.6 Comparative Advantages and Relative Wealth 21 1.6.1 Matching Based on Pre-parenthood Education Levels 21 1.6.2 Comparative Advantage at Home Versus in the Labor Market 22 1.6.3 Wealth in Different Quantile 23 1.7 Son Preference and Compare to Other Countries 24 1.7.1 Son Preference and Compensation 24 1.8 Conclusion 28 2 Social Interactions in the Workplaces: Financial Decisions 2.1 Introduction 45 2.2 Identifying Strategy and Methodology 50 2.2.1 Technical Discussion 54 2.3 FIA Data, Sample Restrictions and Summary Statistics 55 2.3.1 FIA Data 55 2.4 Summary Statistics 59 2.4.1 Households and Peers 59 2.4.2 Instrumental Variables 61 2.5 Main Results 63 2.5.1 Baseline Model 63 2.5.2 Hierarchy Model 65 2.6 Conclusion 69 3 The Effect of 2008 Financial Crisis on Labor Force Participation Across Different Genders 3.1 Introduction 79 3.2 Long-term Trend of Labor Force Participation Rate 81 3.3 Data and Descriptive Statistics 83 3.3.1 Data 83 3.3.2 Summary Statistics 85 3.4 Empirical Strategy 87 3.5 Main Results 89 3.5.1 General Results 89 3.5.2 Which Age Group Is More Likely to Be Not in Employment? 91 3.6 Conclusion 93 References 101 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 家庭經濟學 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 性別差異 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 母職懲罰 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 同儕效應 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 事件研究法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 家庭投資決策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Motherhood Penalty | en |
| dc.subject | Peer Effects | en |
| dc.subject | Event Study | en |
| dc.subject | Gender | en |
| dc.subject | Household Investment | en |
| dc.subject | Family Economics | en |
| dc.title | 應用個體三篇論文:生育懲罰、同儕效應與性別勞參 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Essays on Motherhood Penalty, Peer Effects, and Gendered Labor | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 謝志昇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Chih-Sheng Hsieh | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 樊家忠;林常青;于若蓉;朱祐緯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Elliott Fan;Chang-Ching Lin;Ruoh-Rong Yu;Yu-Wei Luke Chu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 母職懲罰,家庭經濟學,事件研究法,同儕效應,家庭投資決策,性別差異, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Motherhood Penalty,Family Economics,Event Study,Peer Effects,Household Investment,Gender, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 112 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202502666 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 經濟學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 經濟學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 2.59 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
