請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99080完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭銘傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Jason M. Kuo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 田文彥 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Wen-Yen Tien | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-21T16:18:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-22 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-21 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
中央網絡安全和信息化委員會辦公室（2016）。國家網絡空間安全戰略，中央網絡安全和信息化領導小組，12月27日。https://reurl.cc/Rk1ppn 中央黨史和文獻研究院編（2021）。習近平關於網絡強國論述摘編。中央文獻出版社。 中國日報中文網（2023）。亞太互聯網風雲際會 為國爭短長立馬橫刀——LARUS總裁盧恒專訪，1月19日。https://reurl.cc/Qa796p 中國互聯網絡信息中心（2009a）。1986~1993年互聯網大事記，互聯網大事記，5月26日。https://www.cnnic.cn/n4/2022/0401/c87-911.html 中國互聯網絡信息中心（2009b）。1994~1996年互聯網大事記，互聯網大事記，5月26日。https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2022/0401/c87-912.html 中國互聯網絡信息中心（2009c）。1997~1999年互聯網大事記，互聯網大事記，5月26日。https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2022/0401/c87-913.html 中國互聯網絡信息中心（2009d）。2000~2001年互聯網大事記，互聯網大事記，5月26日。https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2022/0401/c87-914.html 中國互聯網絡信息中心（2009e）。2002~2003年互聯網大事記，互聯網大事記，5月26日。https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2022/0401/c87-915.html 中國互聯網絡信息中心（2010）。2010年中國互聯網發展大事記，互聯網大事記，5月10日。https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2022/0401/c87-867.html 中國互聯網絡信息中心（2011）。2011年中國互聯網發展大事記，互聯網大事記，11月30日。https://www.cnnic.net.cn/n4/2022/0401/c87-857.html 中國互聯網協會（2023）。中國互聯網網絡基礎技術起源及發展大事記，8月10日。https://www.isc.org.cn/article/17584222363447296.html 中國新聞網（2013）。〈外交部回應美入侵中國網絡：反對一切形式網絡攻擊〉，中國新聞網，6月24日。https://reurl.cc/4NmAZR 中華人民共和國外交部（2017）。網絡空間國際合作戰略，3月1日。https://reurl.cc/DO1OdR 中華人民共和國外交部（2020）。外交部網絡事務協調員王磊在中國互聯網治理論壇工作組線上成立大會上的發言，5月28日。https://reurl.cc/Mz7zX3 中華人民共和國國務院（1996）。中華人民共和國計算機信息網絡國際聯網管理暫行規定，國家行政法規庫，2月1日。http://xzfg.moj.gov.cn/front/law/detail?LawID=1147 中華人民共和國國務院信息化工作領導小組（1997）。中國互聯網絡域名註冊暫行管理辦法，中國政府網，5月30日。https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/shuju/1997/gwyb199724.pdf 中華人民共和國信息產業部（2002）。中國互聯網絡域名管理辦法。國家互聯網應急中心，3月14日。https://reurl.cc/qY8xQ0 中華人民共和國信息產業部（2005）。互聯網IP地址備案管理辦法，中國政府網，2月8日。https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/2022-08/23/content_5722722.htm 中華人民共和國信息產業部（2006）。信息產業部關於調整中國互聯網絡域名體系的公告，中國政府網，2月24日。https://www.gov.cn/gzdt/2006-02/24/content_210497_2.htm 中華人民共和國國務院新聞辦公室（2010）。中國互聯網狀況，中國政府網，6月8日。https://reurl.cc/WOLlaZ 方興東、陳帥（2019）。中國互聯網25年，現代傳播，4，1-10。 方興東主編（2020）。互聯網口述歷史第1輯：英雄創世紀——讓互聯網精神扎根中國。中信出版集團。 方興東、嚴峰、徐忠良（2021）。漫長的撥號與呼叫—中國互聯網早期接入的技術、經濟、社會和政治因素考察，中國網絡傳播研究，1，3-22。 方濱興主編（2017）。論網絡空間主權。科學出版社。 江澤民（2006）。江澤民文選（第一卷）。人民出版社。 呂新奎（編）（2001）。中國信息經濟年鑑。中國財政經濟出版社。 林小春（2016）。新聞分析：美國真的放棄互聯網控制權了嗎，新華網，10月2日。http://www.xinhuanet.com/world/2016-10/02/c_1119659844.htm 法羅（Farrel, H.）、紐曼（Newman, A.）（2025）。地下帝國：金融、網路、半導體──美國如何將世界經濟武器化（林少予譯）。聯利媒體TVBS。（原著出版於2023） 馬俊（2024）。接入世界30年，中國互聯網展望發展趨勢，環球時報，4月23日。https://china.huanqiu.com/article/4HVCAoR2lpJ 徐培喜（2016）。ICANN @十字路口：駕馭IANA職能管理權移交。網絡空間研究，6，28-33。 徐龍第、郎平（2018）。論網絡空間國際治理的基本原則。國際觀察，3，33-48。 徐龍第（2023）。全球網絡空間治理：核心問題、中國方案與未來方向。歐洲研究，23，58-80。 庫瑪（Kumar, R.）（2020）。研究方法：入門與實務（黃國光譯；謝雨生審閱）。雙葉書廊。（原著出版於 2019） 郭丰、劉昱、劉碧琦（2018）。全球互聯網規則制定的演進與中國策略選擇。廈門大學學報（哲學社會科學版），1，33-43。 陳菲（2009）。谷歌中國網站被譴責傳播淫穢色情和低俗信息。中國政府網，6月18日。https://www.gov.cn/jrzg/2009-06/18/content_1344125.htm 新華社（2005）。黄菊在信息社會世界峰會上發表講話。中國政府網，11月7日。https://www.gov.cn/ldhd/2005-11/17/content_101716_2.htm 廖雷、魏建華（2010）。外交部副部長何亞非：不應過度解讀「谷歌事件」。新華社，1月21日。https://reurl.cc/K9jmyp 遲振漢（2000）。CNNIC在中文域名及多語言域名中扮演的角色及努力。iThome，3月30日。https://www.ithome.com.tw/news/930 魯傳穎（2016）。網絡空間治理與多利益攸關方理論。時事出版社。 劉晗、任啟明（2022）。如何在 ICANN 機制下維護中國網絡主權？。數字經濟與社會，3月10日。https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/nFy1tTpzG4X7CO_K8nO6IQ 劉淑琴（2024）。Crowdstrike更新致全球當機損失至少數十億美元微軟稱錯在歐盟。中央社，7月23日。https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/202407230309.aspx 劉靜怡、雷憶瑜（2003）國際網路組織介紹（編號：TWNIC-IA-091-001）。財團法人台灣網路資訊中心。 薛虹（2016）。互聯網全球治理新篇章：IANA管理權移交與ICANN問責制度改革。網絡空間研究，6，54-60。 貳、西文部分 Abdenur, A. E., & da Silva Gama, C. F. P. (2015). Triggering the Norms Cascade: Brazil’s Initiatives for Curbing Electronic Espionage. Global Governance, 21(3), 455–474. Acharya, A. (2014). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia. Routledge. Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms. The American Political Science Review, 80(4), 1095–1111. Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi‐stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment,16(5), 290–306. Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. University of Michigan Press. Bearce, D. H., & Bondanella, S. (2007). Intergovernmental organizations, socialization, and member-state interest convergence. International Organization, 61(4), 703–733. Bhuiyan, A. (2014). Internet governance and the global South: Demand for a new framework. Palgrave Macmillan. Boström, M., & Hallström, K. T. (2013). Global multi-stakeholder standard setters: How fragile are they? Journal of Global Ethics, 9(1), 93–110. Branigan, T. (2010). Google to end censorship in China over cyber attacks. The Guardian, January 12. https://reurl.cc/5Rqjn7 Buchanan, B. (2019). The Cybersecurity Dilemma: Hacking, Trust, and Fear between Nations. Oxford University Press. Campbell, N., & Gahnberg, C. (2022). Strengthening the Internet: Internet Impact Brief–Impact of Ukraine’s Requests to Block Russia’s Access to the Internet. Internet Society, March 18. https://reurl.cc/VWXA9Q Cavelty, M. D. (2009). National security and the internet: Distributed security through distributed responsibility. In J. Eriksson & G. Giacomello (Eds.), Who controls the internet? Beyond the obstinacy or obsolescence of the state (pp. 214–218). International Studies Association. Cerf, V. (2005). Vint Cerf speaks out on net neutrality. Google Blog, November 8. https://reurl.cc/vL1Yle Cerf, V., Ryan, P., and Max Senges. (2014). Internet governance is our shared responsibility. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society, 10(1),1-42. Checkel, J. T. (2005). International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organization, 59(4), 801–826. Chelotti, N., Dasandi, N., & Mikhaylov, S. J. (2022). Do intergovernmental organizations have a socialization effect on member state preferences? Evidence from the UN General Debate. International Studies Quarterly, 66(1), sqab069. Cheng, J., & Zeng, J. (2022). Shaping AI’s Future? China in Global AI Governance. Journal of Contemporary China, 32(143), 794–810. China. (2005). China’s Comments to WGIG on Draft Working Papers Identifying Issues for Internet Governance. WGIG, February 11. https://www.wgig.org/docs/Comment-China.doc Clegg, J. (2011). China at the global summit table: rule-taker, deal-wrecker or bridge-builder? Contemporary Politics, 17(4), 447–465. Cowhey, P. F. (1990). The international telecommunications regime: the political roots ofregimes for high technology. International Organization, 44(2), 169–199. Cowhey, P.F., & Aronson, J. D. (2017). Digital DNA: Disruption and the challenges for global governance. Oxford University Press. Deibert, R. J., Crete-Nishihata, M. (2012). Global Governance and the Spread of Cyberspace Controls. Global Governance, 18, 339-361. DeNardis, L. (2009). Protocol Politics: The Globalization of Internet Governance. The MIT Press. DeNardis, L. (2020). Introduction: Internet governance as an object of research inquiry. In L. DeNardis, D. L. Cogburn, N. S. Levinson, & F. Musiani (Eds.), Researching Internet governance: Methods, frameworks, futures (pp. 1–20). The MIT Press. Dingwerth, K., & Pattberg, P. (2006). Global governance as a perspective on world politics. Global Governance, 12(2), 185–203. Drezner, D. W. (2004). The global governance of the Internet: Bringing the state back in. Political Science Quarterly, 119(3), 477–498 Eriksson, J., & Giacomello, G. (2009). Who controls what, and under what conditions? In J. Eriksson & G. Giacomello (Eds.), Who controls the internet? Beyond the obstinacy or obsolescence of the state (pp. 206–210). International Studies Association. Ermert, M., Hughes, C. R. (2003). What’s in a Name? China and the Domain Name System. In C. R. Hughes & G. Wacker (Eds.), China and the Internet: Politics of the Digital Leap Forward (pp. 127–138). Routledge. Felter, P. (2023). Legal opinion on Regional Internet Registry (RIR) governance with a focus on APNIC. Larus, February 25. https://reurl.cc/WOE3EZ Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press. Finkelstein, L. S. (1995). What is global governance? Global Governance, 1(3), 367–372. Finnemore M., Sikkink, K. (1998). International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization, 52(4), 887-917. Flonk, D. (2021). Emerging illiberal norms: Russia and China as promoters of Internet content control. International Affairs, 97(6), 1925-1944. Frank, R. (1988). Passions within reason: The strategic role of the emotions. W. W. Norton. Fransen, L. W., & Klok, A. (2007). Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization, 14(5), 667–684. Freeman, R. E. (2010). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press. G77 and China. (2023). G77 and China inputs to the Global Digital Compact discussions. United Nations. https://reurl.cc/da5Ee2 GAC. (1999a). Communiqué of the Governmental Advisory Committee. Governmental Advisory Committee Official Web Presence, March 2.https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann1-singapore-communique?language_id=1 GAC. (1999b). Communiqué of Governmental Advisory Committee. Governmental Advisory Committee Official Web Presence, November 2.https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann4-los-angeles-communique?language_id=1 GAC. (2001a). Communiqué of the Governmental Advisory Committee. Governmental Advisory Committee Official Web Presence, March 10.https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann8-melbourne-communique?language_id=1 GAC. (2001b). Communiqué of the Governmental Advisory Committee. Governmental Advisory Committee Official Web Presence, June 1~2.1https://gac.icann.org/contentMigrated/icann9-stockholm-communique?language_id=1 GAC. (2017). Operating Principles. Governmental Advisory Committee Official Web Presence, June 16. https://gac.icann.org/operating-principles/operating-principles-june-2017 Galloway, T., and Baogang He. (2014). China and technical global Internet governance: Beijing's approach to multi-stakeholder governance within ICANN, WSIS and the IGF. China: An International Journal, 12(3), 72-93. Gheciu, A. (2005). Security Institutions as Agents of Socialization? NATO and the “New Europe.” International Organization, 59(4), 973–1012. Glennan, S. S. (1996). Mechanisms and the nature of causation. Erkenntnis, 44(1), 49–71. Goldsmith, J. (1998). The Internet and the Abiding Significance of Territorial Sovereignty. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 5(2), 475-491. Goldsmith, J., Wu, T. (2006). Who Controls the Internet?: Illusions of a Borderless World. Oxford University Press. Greenhill, B. (2010). The company you keep: International socialization and the diffusion of human rights norms. International Studies Quarterly, 54(1), 127–145. Hatch, E. (1989). Theories of social honor. American Anthropologist, 91(2), 341–353. Helm, T., Boffey, D., & Hopkins, N. (2013). Snowden spy row grows as US is accused of hacking China. The Guardian, June 22. https://reurl.cc/VWXrNN Hofmann, J. (2016). Multi-stakeholderism in Internet governance: Putting a fiction into practice. Journal of Cyber Policy, 1(1), 29–49. Hu, Qi Heng. (2005). Internationalized Oversight of Internet Resource Management. In William Drake (Eds.), Reforming Internet Governance: Perspective from the Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG) (pp. 185-192) The United Nations Information and Communication Technologies Task Force. Hulvey, R. A. (2022). Cyber sovereignty: How China is changing the rules of Internet freedom (IGCC Working Paper No. 2). University of California Institute on Global Conflict and Cooperation https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7sg3716k Hulvey, Rachel A. (2024). Discourse Power: How China Gains Global Support for Its Vision of Cyber Order. Rachel Ann Hulvey (personal website), April 3. https://reurl.cc/bmRLY6 ICANN. (2001). Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) Committee. ICANN Archives. August 28. https://reurl.cc/GNr9pd ICANN. (2003a). ICANN Rio de Janeiro Meeting Topic: Internationalized Domain Names. ICANN Archives, March 13. https://reurl.cc/ZN70Vp ICANN. (2003b). Guidelines for the Implementation of Internationalized Domain Names| Version 1.0. ICANN, June 20. https://reurl.cc/jr5NQ1 ICANN. (2025). Bylaws for Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers – A California Nonprofit Public-Benefit Corporation. ICANN Governance Documents, January 8. https://www.icann.org/en/governance/bylaws ICANN Board. (2000). Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers Minutes of Special Meeting. Board Activities and Meetings, September 25. https://reurl.cc/axvoZY ICANN Board. (2006). Adopted Resolutions from ICANN Board Meeting 8 December 2006. Board Activities and Meetings, December 8. https://reurl.cc/7Vog41 Ikenberry, G. J., & Kupchan, C. A. (1990). Socialization and hegemonic power. International Organization, 44(3), 283–315. Johnson, D. R., & Post, D. (1997). And how shall the net be governed? A meditation on the relative virtues of decentralized, emergent law. In B. Kahin & J. H. Keller (Eds.), Coordinating the Internet (pp. 62–91). MIT Press. Johnston, A. I. (2008). Social states: China in international institutions, 1980–2000. Princeton University Press. Johnston, A. I. (2019). China in a world of orders: Rethinking compliance and challenge in Beijing’s international relations. International Security, 44(2), 9–60. Kastner, S. L., Pearson, M. M., & Rector, C. (2016). Invest, Hold Up, or Accept? China in Multilateral Governance. Security Studies, 25(1), 142–179. Kawulich, B. B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(2), Article 43. Keohane, R. O. (1990). Multilateralism: An agenda for research. International Journal, 45(4), 731–764. Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. Keohane, R. O., & Victor, D. G. (2016). Cooperation and discord in global climate policy. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 570–575. Konishi, K., Huang, K., Qian, H. & Ko, Y. (2004). Joint Engineering Team (JET) Guidelines for Internationalized Domain Names (IDN) Registration and Administration for Chinese, Japanese, and Korean RFC 3743. IETF, April. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc3743/ Kosseff, J. (2019). The twenty-six words that created the internet. Cornell University Press. Kreps, D. M. (1992). Corporate culture and economic theory. In J. E. Alt & K. A. Shepsle (Eds.), Perspectives on positive political economy (pp. 90–143). Cambridge University Press. Kurland, N., & Calton, J. (1995). A theory of stakeholder enabling: Giving voice to an emerging postmodern praxis of organizational discourse. In D. M. Boje, R. P. Gephart Jr., & T. J. Thatchenkery (Eds.), Postmodern management and organizational theory (pp. 154–177). Sage. Larus. (2023). Legal review highlights risk to the internet across Asia Pacific. March 2. https://larus.net/legal-review-highlights-risk-to-the-internet-across-asia-pacific/ Lee, X., Mao, W., Chen, E., Hsu, N. & Klensin, J. (2006). Registration and Administration Recommendations for Chinese Domain Names RFC4713. IETF, October. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc4713 Leiner, B. M., Cerf, V. G., Clark, D. D., Kahn, R. E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D. C., Postel, J., Roberts, L. G., & Wolff, S. (1997). Brief history of the Internet. Internet Society. https://www.internetsociety.org/resources/doc/2017/brief-history-internet/ Lott, B., & Lott, A. J. (1985). Learning theory in contemporary social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 109–135). Random House. MacKinnon, R. (2006). China’s New Domain Names: Lost in Translation. CircleID, February 28. https://reurl.cc/Z4R9la Mackinnon, R. (2009a). China calls for an end to the Internet Governance Forum. RCoversation, May 14. https://reurl.cc/3ML0k0 Mackinnon, R. (2009b). China @ ICANN: thoughts from former CEO Paul Twomey. RConversation, July 3. https://reurl.cc/nY09x1 MacKinnon, R. (2012). Consent of the Networked. Basic Books. Magaziner, Ira C. (1999). Creating a Framework for Global Electronic Commerce. Future Insight, July. https://reurl.cc/4LkWzv McGreal, C., & Johnson, B. (2010). Hillary Clinton criticises Beijing over internet censorship. The Guardian, January 21. https://reurl.cc/DO6RY5 Mueller, M. (2002). Ruling the Root: Internet Governance and the Taming of Cyberspace. The MIT Press. Mueller, M., Mathiason, J., & Klein, H. (2007). The Internet and global governance: Principles and norms for a new regime. Global Governance, 13(2), 237–254. Mueller, M. (2010). Networks and States: The Global Politics of Internet Governance. The MIT Press. Mueller, M. (2011). China and global Internet governance: A tiger by the tail. In R. Deibert, J. Palfrey, R. Rohozinski & J. L. Zittrain (Eds.), Access Contested: Security, Identity, and Resistance in Asian Cyberspace (pp. 177-194). The MIT Press. Mueller, M. (2014). The first meeting of the IANA stewardship transition coordination group. Internet Governance Poroject, July 20. https://reurl.cc/x30yoe Mueller, M., & Badiei, F. (2020). Inventing internet governance: The historical trajectory of the phenomenon and the field. In L. DeNardis, D. L. Cogburn, N. S. Levinson, & F. Musiani (Eds.), Researching internet governance: Methods, frameworks, futures (pp. 59–84). The MIT Press. Nadelmann, E. A. (1990). Global prohibition regimes: The evolution of norms in international society. International Organization, 44(4), 479–526. National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (1997). Request for Comments on the Registration and Administration of Internet Domain Names. U.S. Department of Commerce, July 2. https://reurl.cc/0WDjm6 National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (1998a). Improvement of Technical Management of Internet Names and Addresses; Proposed Rules. U.S. Department of Commerce, February 20. https://reurl.cc/89y3XX National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (1998b). Statement of Policy on the Management of Internet Names and Addresses. U.S. Department of Commerce, June 5. https://reurl.cc/XQkd3e National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (1998c). Memorandum of Understanding Between the U.S. Department of Commerce and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers. U.S. Department of Commerce, November 25. https://reurl.cc/WOL5WD National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA). (2014). NTIA Announces Intent to Transition Key Internet Domain Name Functions. U.S. Department of Commerce, March 14. https://reurl.cc/ko0Rv3 Negro, G. (2019). A history of Chinese global Internet governance and its relations with ITU and ICANN. Chinese Journal of Communication, 13(1), 104–121. NETmundial. (2014). NETmundial Multistakeholder Statement. NETmundial, April 24. https://netmundial.br/2014/netmundial-multistakeholder-statement/ Nye, J. S., and R. Keohane. 1971. “Transnational Relations and World Politics: An Introduction.” International Organization, 25(3): 329-349. Nye, J. S. (2014). The regime complex for managing global cyber activities. Global Commission on Internet Governance Paper Series, 1, 1–16. Onuf, N. (1998). Constructivism: A user’s manual. In V. Kubálková, N. Onuf, & P. Kowert (Eds.), International relations in a constructed world (pp. 58–78). M. E. Sharpe. Open Internet Governance. (2024). An open letter to the United Nations, July 1. https://reurl.cc/6qloOk Powers, S. M & Jablonski, M. (2015). The Real Cyberwar: The Political Economy of Internet Freedom. University of Illinois Press. Public Technical Identifiers (PTI). (2016). Bylaws of Public Technical Identifiers – A California Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation. PTI Bylaws Archive (ICANN official website), September 28. https://pti.icann.org/bylaws-archive Raymond, M., & DeNardis, L. (2015). Multistakeholderism: Anatomy of an inchoate global institution. International Theory, 7(3), 572-616. Risse, T., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The socialization of international human rights norms into domestic practices: Introduction. In T. Risse & K. Sikkink (Eds.), The power of human rights: International norms and domestic change (pp. 1-39). Cambridge University Press. Rosenau, J. N. (1992). Governance, order, and change in world politics. In J. N. Rosenau & E.-O. Czempiel (Eds.), Governance without government: Order and change in world politics (pp. 1-29). Cambridge University Press. Rosenau, J. N. (1995). Governance in the twenty-first century. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 1(1), 13-43. Ruggie, J. G. (1992). Multilateralism: The anatomy of an institution. International Organization, 46(3), 561-598. Sahel, J. J. (2016). Multi-stakeholder governance: a necessity and a challenge for global governance in the twenty-first century. Journal of Cyber Policy, 1(2), 1-19. Shen, H. (2016). China and global internet governance: toward an alternative analytical framework.” Chinese Journal of Communication, 9(3), 304-324. Shen, H. (2017). Across the Great (Fire) Wall: China and the global Internet [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. https://hdl.handle.net/2142/97589 The Internet Community. (1997). Establishment of a memorandum of understanding on the generic top level domain name space of the Internet domain name system (gTLD-MoU). ICANN, February 28. https://web.archive.org/web/19971211190257/http:/www.gtld-mou.org/gTLD-MoU.html United Nations. (2010). Continuation of the Internet Governance Forum: Note by the Secretary-General (A/65/78–E/2010/68). United Nations Digital Library, May 10. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/683573 Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Random House. Weiss, J. C., & Wallace, J. L. (2021). Domestic Politics, China’s Rise, and the Future of the Liberal International Order. International Organization, 75(2), 635–664. Weiss, T. G., & Wilkinson, R. (2014). Rethinking global governance? Complexity, authority, power, change. International Studies Quarterly, 58(1), 207-215. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge University Press. Weston, D. (2024). Helping our customers through the CrowdStrike outage. Official Microsoft Blog, July 20. https://reurl.cc/0WO50Y White House. (1997). A Framework for Global Electronic Commerce, July 1. https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/WH/New/Commerce/read.html White House. (2023). National cybersecurity strategy, March 2. https://reurl.cc/0WO5qY Working Group on Internet Governance (WGIG). (2005). Report of the Working Group on Internet Governance. WGIG, June. https://www.wgig.org/docs/WGIGREPORT.pdf World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). (2003). Declaration of Principles – Building the Information Society: a global challenge in the new Millennium. ITU, December 12. https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs/geneva/official/dop.html World Summit on the Information Society (WSIS). (2005). Tunis Agenda for the Information Society. ITU, December 12. https://www.itu.int/net/wsis/docs2/tunis/off/6rev1.html Wu, T. (1997). Cyberspace Sovereignty? The Internet and the International System. Harvard Journal of Law & Technology, 10(3), 648-666. Wu, T. (2003). Network neutrality, broadband discrimination. Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law, 2, 141-175. Xue, H. (2004). The Voice of China: Story of Chinese-character Domain Names. Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law, 12(2), 559-592. Zimbardo, P. G., & Leippe, M. R. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence. McGraw-Hill. Zhu, H., Hu, D., Wang, Z., Kao, T., Chang, W., & Crispin, M. (1996). Chinese Character Encoding for Internet Messages: RFC 1922. IETF, March 1. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc1922/ | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/99080 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討中國如何參與全球網路治理，並特別聚焦於關鍵網路資源領域。透過分析中國與國際機構之官方或半官方文件，以及筆者實地走訪「網際網路名稱與數位位址分配機構」年度大會和相關青年獎學金計劃，同時加上一手訪談資料，本文指出中國政府參與全球關鍵網路資源治理時，因為自身價值衝突和最初國際間缺乏具有共識的規範，使其無法完成多方利害關係人主義的社會化進程。為了解釋此現象，本文延伸Alastair Iain Johnston對中國社會化的線性理解，提出「不完全社會化理論」闡釋行為者在規範不明或價值衝突下，可能選擇退出制度場域或是發展競爭性論述來抵制團體規範。本文透過紮實的經驗證據， 補充過往研究僅聚焦中國參與全球網路治理的國家利益或經濟導向視角，相較於既有國際關係文獻對中國網路主權的宏觀討論，本文注重中國政府與多方利害關係人機制互動過程中所面臨的困境和摩擦，為國際關係與全球治理研究提供新的理論和實證貢獻。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This dissertation discusses how China participates in global Internet governance, particularly in the field of critical Internet resources. Drawing on official and semi-official documents from the Chinese government and international organizations, supplemented by participant observation at ICANN annual meeting and related youth fellowship programs, as well as original interview data, this dissertation argues that the Chinese government has been unable to fully undergo the socialization process of multistakeholderism in the global governance of critical Internet resources, due to internal value conflicts and the initial absence of widely accepted international norms. To explain this phenomenon, the study builds on Alastair Iain Johnston’s linear model of China’s socialization and proposes a “theory of incomplete socialization,” which posits that when norms are ambiguous or conflict with an actor’s core values, the actor may choose to exit the institutional arena or develop competing discourses that challenge the dominant norms. Supported by solid empirical evidence, this dissertation complements previous studies that have primarily focused on China’s national interests or economic motivations in global Internet governance. Compared to the existing international relations literature that primarily focuses on macro-level discussions of China’s cyber sovereignty, this study highlights the challenges and frictions the Chinese government faces in its interactions with multistakeholder mechanisms, thereby offering new theoretical and empirical contributions to the study of international relations and global governance. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-21T16:18:31Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-21T16:18:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 ii
摘要 iv Abstract v 目次 vi 圖次 viii 表次 ix 縮寫表 x 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究問題 3 第三節 研究範圍與目的 6 第二章 文獻回顧 9 第一節 全球治理 9 第二節 全球網路治理 16 第三節 中國與全球網路治理 22 第四節 本章小結 28 第三章 研究架構 31 第一節 本文理論框架 31 第二節 研究設計 44 第三節 章節安排 48 第四章 嘗試聯網的時空背景 51 第一節 功能性的模仿 51 第二節 缺乏具有共識的團體規範 59 第三節 本章小結 67 第五章 走向分歧 69 第一節 政府：確保政權存續 69 第二節 抵制的初步行動 74 第三節 技術社群：接受社會影響 82 第四節 本章小結 90 第六章 加劇分歧 93 第一節 發展競爭性論述 93 第二節 多方利害關係人主義勝出 109 第三節 持續的規範競爭 116 第四節 本章小結 130 第七章 結論 133 第一節 研究發現與成果 133 第二節 研究貢獻 136 第三節 研究限制 137 第四節 研究展望 138 參考文獻 141 附錄一 深度訪談提綱 160 附錄二 年表 161 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 網際網路名稱與數位位址分配機構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 中國 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 不完全社會化 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 全球網路治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 關鍵網路資源 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) | en |
| dc.subject | global Internet governance | en |
| dc.subject | incomplete socialization | en |
| dc.subject | China | en |
| dc.subject | critical Internet resources | en |
| dc.title | 不完全的社會化：中國與全球網路治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Incomplete Socialization: China and Global Internet Governance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林竣達;蔡志宏 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jiun-Da Lin;Henry Tsai | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 全球網路治理,網際網路名稱與數位位址分配機構,關鍵網路資源,中國,不完全社會化, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | global Internet governance,Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN),critical Internet resources,China,incomplete socialization, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 164 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503176 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-22 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 4.48 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。