請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98965完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張佑宗 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-Tzung Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 侯長坤 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | CHANGKUN HOU | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-20T16:27:46Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-21 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-20 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-13 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 人民日報（2014）。中國定力從何而來。人民日報，5月1日。http://www.xinhuanet.com//world/2014-05/01/c_126453330.htm [People’s Daily. (2014). China’s strategic resolve. People’s Daily, May 1.]
人民日報（2023）。習近平的天下情懷。人民日報，3月24日。http://politics.people.com.cn/BIG5/n1/2023/0324/c1001-32650137.html [People’s Daily. (2023). Xi Jinping’s Tianxia sentiment. People’s Daily, March 24.] 于建忠、范祚軍（2018）。東盟共同體與中國—東盟關係研究。人民出版社。[Yu, Jianzhong, & Fan, Zuojun. (2018). Research on ASEAN Community and China–ASEAN Relations. Renmin Press.] 干春松、安樂哲（2023）。什麼是「天下」？收入干春松、安樂哲（編），重思天下（頁1–20）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。[Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (2023). What is Tianxia? In Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (Eds.), Rethinking Tianxia (pp. 1–20), City University of Hong Kong Press.] 孔子（2015）。論語·為政，收入陳曉芬、徐儒宗譯，論語·大學·中庸，北京：中華書局，第15–26頁。[Confucius. (2015). The Analects: Wei Zheng, In The Analects, The Great Learning, and The Doctrine of the Mean (Chen Xiaofen and Xu Ruzong trans.). Beijing: Zhonghua Book] 尤淑君（2016）。清代「天下秩序觀」的簡歷、解構及其轉化。文化縱橫，(6)，72–81。[Yu, Shujun. (2016). The Qing view of Tianxia order: Outline, deconstruction, and transformation, Beijing Cultural Review, (6), 72–81.] 王小紅、何新華（2014）。天下體系：一種建構世界秩序的中國經驗。光明日報出版社。[Wang, Xiaohong, & He, Xinhua. (2014). The Tianxia System: A Chinese Experience of Constructing World Order. Guangming Daily Press.] 王亞琪（2023）。RCEP啟動後亞太區域經貿合作的東亞轉向。現代國際關係，(2)，96–114。[Wang, Yaqi. (2023). East Asian turn in regional economic cooperation post-RCEP. Modern International Relations, (2), 96–114.] 王泉偉（2016）。構想天下秩序：漢代中國的對外大戰略。外交評論，(3)，100–132。[Wang, Chuan-wei. (2016). Imagining Tianxia order: China’s grand foreign strategy in the Han dynasty, Foreign Affairs Review, (3), 100–132.] 王海運（2015）。上海合作組織與中國。上海大學出版社。[Wang, Haiyun. (2015). The Shanghai Cooperation Organization and China. Shanghai University Press.] 王棟、李安迪（2022）。論百年變局下全球化與區域化的新發展趨勢。當代世界與社會主義，(4)，21–29。[Wang, Dong, & Li, Andi. (2022). New trends of globalization and regionalism under the century of change. Contemporary World and Socialism, (4), 21–29.] 王義桅（2015）。一帶一路：機遇與挑戰。人民出版社 [Wang, Yiwei. (2015). The Belt and Road Initiative: Opportunities and Challenges. People's Publishing House.] 王義桅（2025）。胸懷天下：中國式現代化的世界意義。浙江人民出版社 [Wang, Yiwei. (2025). Embracing All Under Heaven: The Global Significance of Chinese-Style Modernization. Zhejiang People’s Publishing House.] 王德權（2006）。在東京與京都之外：渡邊信一郎的中國古代史研究。新史學，17(1)，143–202。[Wang, Dequan. (2006). Beyond Tokyo and Kyoto: Watanabe Shinichiro’s research on ancient Chinese history, New History, 17(1), 143–202.] 王慶新（2016）。儒家王道理想、天下主義與現代國際秩序的未來。外交評論，33(3)，73–99。[Wang, Qingxin. (2016). The Confucian ideal of kingly way, Tianxia-ism, and the future of modern international order, Foreign Affairs Review, 33(3), 73–99.] 王銳（2023）。「天下」的近代歧說——對近代以來幾種相關解讀的辨析。思想戰線，(5)。[Wang, Rui. (2023). Modern Divergent Interpretations of Tianxia: A Critical Analysis of Several Modern Readings. Thought Front, (5).] 包剛升（2024）。大國的命運。杭州：浙江人民出版社。[Bao, Gangsheng. (2024). The fate of great powers, Zhejiang People's Publishing House.] 左丘明（2016）。左傳·文公十八年》，收入郭丹、程小青、李彬源（譯），左傳，北京：中華書局，第651–660頁。[Zuo, Qiuming. (2016). Zuo zhuan: Duke Wen, year 18, in Zuo zhuan (Guo Dan, Cheng Xiaoqing, and Li Binyuan trans.). Beijing: Zhonghua Book] 甘懷真（2023）。天下作為政體：兼論「中國轉向」。收入干春松、安樂哲（編），重思天下（頁277–298）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。[Cheng, Tsung-yi. (2023). A comment on Zhao Tingyang’s “What exactly is Tianxia?”, In Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (Eds.), Rethinking Tianxia (pp. 277–298), City University of Hong Kong Press.] 石之瑜（2025）。以民為本，全球南方是創新的儒家天下。文匯報， 4月7日，第10版。[Shih, Chih-yu. (2025). People-centered governance: The Global South as an innovative Confucian Tianxia. Wen Wei Po, April 7, 2025, p. 10.] 石之瑜、林廣挺、湯名輝（2019）。科學的國際「關係性」：天下、軟實力與世界秩序。國際政治研究，40(3)，38–63。[Shih, Chih-yu, Lin, Guangting, & Tang, Minghui. (2019). Scientific relationality in international relations: Tianxia, soft power and world order, Journal of International Political Studies, 40(3), 38–63.] 石之瑜、侯長坤（2024）。全球南方與安全社群——對理論的去殖民化反思。國際展望，(3)，1–29。[Shih, Chih-yu, & Hou, Changkun. (2024). The Global South and Security Communities: A Decolonial Reflection on Theory. International Prospect, (3), 1–29.] 石之瑜、侯長坤（2025）。全球南方與安全社群——對理論的去殖民化反思。中國人民大學書報資料中心，(3)，66–81。[Shih, Chih-yu, & Hou, Changkun. (2025). The Global South and Security Communities: A Decolonial Reflection on Theory. Renmin University Data Center, (3), 66–81.] 邓小平（1994）。邓小平文选，第二卷，北京：人民出版社，第237–238頁。[Deng, Xiaoping. (1994). Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Vol. 2. Beijing: People’s Publishing House, pp. 237–238.] 任致均（2023）。在天下秩序中尋找朝鮮王朝。收入干春松、安樂哲（編），重思天下（頁259–276）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。[Ren, Zhijun. (2023). Seeking the Chosŏn dynasty in the Tianxia order. In Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (Eds.), Rethinking Tianxia (pp. 259–276), City University of Hong Kong Press.] 任劍濤（2021）。「一是皆以修身為本」：家國天下的個體遞歸。國際儒學，(2)。[Ren, Jiantao. (2021). “Everything Starts with Self-Cultivation”: Individual Recursion in the Family-Nation-Tianxia Framework. International Confucianism, (2).] 任曉（2013）。論東亞「共生體系」原理：對外關係思想和制度研究之一。世界經濟與政治，（7），4–22。[Ren, Xiao. (2013). On the principle of East Asia's "symbiotic system": Theories and institutions of foreign relations (Part I), World Economics and Politics, (7), 4–22.] 全毅、高軍行（2022）。CPTPP與RCEP的競爭及中國的應對策略。東南亞研究，(2)，48–70。[Quan, Yi, & Gao, Junxing. (2022). Competition between CPTPP and RCEP and China’s strategic responses. Southeast Asian Studies, (2), 48–70.] 江帆（2013）。東盟安全共同體變遷規律研究。中國社會科學出版社。[Jiang, Fan. (2013). A study on the transformation of ASEAN Security Community. China Social Sciences Press.] 老子（2010）。老子（湯漳平、王朝華譯），北京：中華書局，第188–192頁。[Laozi. (2010). Laozi (Tang Zhangping and Wang Zhaohua trans.). Beijing: Zhonghua Book] 余文全（2022）。關係網絡中的崛起國：編配者與領導力。世界經濟與政治，(7)，100–126。[Yu, Wenquan. (2022). Rising powers in relational networks: The coordinator and leadership. World Economics and Politics, (7), 100–126.] 吳稼祥（2013）。公天下。南寧：廣西師範大學出版社。[Wu, Jiaxiang. (2013). Common Tianxia, Guangxi Normal University Press.] 呂利文（2013）。中國古代天下觀的意識形態建構及其制度實踐。中國邊疆史地研究，(3)。[Lü, Liwen. (2013). The ideological construction and institutional practice of ancient China’s Tianxia worldview, China Borderland History and Geography Studies, (3).] 李揚帆（2002）。「天下」觀念考。國際政治研究，(1)，105–114。[Li, Yangfan. (2002). A study on the concept of Tianxia, International Political Studies, (1), 105–114.] 李揚帆（2015）。「中華帝國」的概念及其世界秩序：被誤讀的天下秩序。國際政治研究，(5)。[Li, Yangfan. (2015). The Concept of "Chinese Empire" and Its World Order: Misinterpretations of the Tianxia Order. International Political Studies, (5).] 李進峰（2021）。上海合作組織20年：成就、挑戰與前景。社會科學文獻出版社，第151–152頁。[Li, Jinfeng. (2021). 20 Years of the SCO: Achievements, Challenges, and Prospects. Social Sciences Academic Press, pp. 151–152.] 李雲泉（2004）。朝貢制度史論——中國古代對外關係體制研究。北京：新華出版社。[Li, Yunquan. (2004). Historical studies on the tribute system: Ancient China’s external relations system, Xinhua Publishing House.] 沈志華（2007）。中蘇同盟破裂的原因和結果。中共黨史研究，2007年第2期，第29–42頁。[Shen, Zhihua. (2007). Causes and Consequences of the Sino-Soviet Split. CPC Party History Studies, No. 2, pp. 29–42.] 沈志華（2012）。冷戰中的盟友：社會主義陣營內部的國家關係。九州出版社。[Shen, Zhihua. (2012). Allies in the Cold War: Intra-bloc State Relations in the Socialist Camp. Jiuzhou Press, pp. 189–211.] 貝淡寧（2023）。中國和印度領導下的亞洲區域秩序前瞻，載於干春松、安樂哲（編），重思天下（頁45–94）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。[Bell, Daniel A. (2023). Prospects for a regional order led by China and India. In Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (Eds.), Rethinking Tianxia (pp. 45–94), City University of Hong Kong Press.] 周桂銀（2021）。中國古代「天下主義」的千年傳統：演進、內涵和特徵。世界經濟與政治論壇，(2)，1–20。[Zhou, Guiyin. (2021). The millennium tradition of ancient Chinese Tianxia-ism: Evolution, connotations, and features, Forum of World Economics and Politics, (2), 1–20.] 周桂銀、宋德星、劉豐、祁玲玲、毛維準、張曉通、何櫻灝（2021）。中國與國際秩序筆談：觀念與戰略。國際展望，13(1)，16–47+154。[Zhou, Guiyin et al. (2021). Symposium on China and international order: Ideas and strategy. China International Strategy Review, 13(1), 16–47+154.] 孟維瞻、胡偉星（2024）。探究古代東亞等級國際秩序長期存在的原因——以中國「大一統」政道下的政治勢能為研究視角。南國學術，14(3)，456–472。[Meng, Weizhan & Hu, Weixing. (2024). Explaining the persistence of hierarchical international order in ancient East Asia: The political momentum of Chinese unification, Southern Academic Journal, 14(3), 456–472.] 林尚立（2023）。天下國家道理：中國共產黨的成功之道。上海：上海人民出版社。[Lin, Shangli. (2023). The principle of Tianxia-state: The path of the CCP’s success, Shanghai People's Publishing House.] 祁懷高、李開盛（2023）。東北亞權力結構演變和中國的戰略選擇——基於21世紀第三個十年的預測分析。亞太安全與海洋研究，(4)，1–24。[Qi, Huaigao & Li, Kaiseng. (2023). Power structure evolution in Northeast Asia and China’s strategic choice: A forecast analysis for the third decade of the 21st century. Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Studies, (4), 1–24.] 門洪華（2021）。構建新時代中國國際統一戰線——一項戰略研究議程。世界經濟與政治，(6)，4–27。[Men, Honghua. (2021). Building a new era of China’s international united front: A strategic research agenda. World Economics and Politics, (6), 4–27.] 侯長坤（2023a）。戰略文化視角下的中國古代天下主義。國際政治研究，44(5)，110–135。[Hou, Changkun. (2023a). Ancient Chinese Tianxia-ism from a strategic culture perspective, Journal of International Political Studies, 44(5), 110–135.] 侯長坤（2023b）。王霸之辯：崛起、霸權、衰落的戰略選擇。收入潘忠岐（編），中華經典國際關係辯論手冊（頁113–138）。上海：上海人民出版社。[Hou, Changkun. (2023b). Between kingship and hegemony: Strategic choices in rise, dominance, and decline. In Pan, Zhongqi (Ed.), Debates on Classic Chinese International Relations (pp. 113–138), Shanghai People's Publishing House.] 侯長坤（2023c）。天下主義的包容與擴散:春秋時期楚國入華夏的大數據文本分析。中國政治學，(3)，62–93。[Hou, Changkun. (2023c). Inclusiveness and diffusion of Tianxia-ism: A big data textual analysis of the Chu State’s integration into Huaxia during the Spring and Autumn period, Chinese Political Science, (3), 62–93.] 侯長坤（2024）。天下的實證：從春秋戰國到當代。臺北：南天書局。[Hou, Changkun. (2024). The empirical Tianxia: From the Spring and Autumn to the present, Nantian Publishing.] 侯長坤（2025）。天下體系的崩潰:以明朝中後期為例。中國政治學，(2)。[Hou, Changkun. (2025). The collapse of the Tianxia system: A case study of the mid-to-late Ming dynasty, Chinese Political Science, (2).] 俞可平（2023）。帝國新論。浙江人民出版社。[Yu, Keping. (2023). New Reflections on Empire. Zhejiang People’s Publishing House.] 俞沂暄（2020）。超越霸權，國際關係中領導的性質及其觀念基礎。復旦國際關係評論，28(2)，42–59。[Yu, Yixuan. (2020). Beyond hegemony: The nature and ideational basis of leadership in international relations. Fudan International Relations Review, 28(2), 42–59.] 姚中秋（2012）。華夏治理秩序史：天下。海口：海南出版社。[Yao, Zhongqiu. (2012). History of governance in Huaxia: Tianxia, Hainan Publishing House.] 姚中秋（2013）。世界歷史的中國時刻。文化縱橫，(3)，77–82。[Yao, Zhongqiu. (2013). China’s moment in world history, Beijing Cultural Review, (3), 77–82.] 柯嵐安、徐進（2008）。中國視野下的世界秩序：天下、帝國和世界。世界經濟與政治，（10），49–56。[Callahan, William A. & Xu, Jin. (2008). World order from a Chinese perspective: Tianxia, empire and the world, World Economics and Politics, (10), 49–56.] 胡鍵（2022）。「戰略時間差」與中國的戰略安全。國際安全研究，40(3)，57–78。[Hu, Jian. (2022). Strategic time gap and China's strategic security. Journal of International Security Studies, 40(3), 57–78.] 范存祺、莫敏（2024）。RCEP與亞太地區重疊式自由貿易區整合。東北亞論壇，33(2)，114–126。[Fan, Cunqi, & Mo, Min. (2024). RCEP and overlapping FTA integration in Asia-Pacific. Northeast Asia Forum, 33(2), 114–126.] 韋兵（2019）。完整的天下經驗：宋遼夏金元之間的互動。北京：北京師範大學出版社。[Wei, Bing. (2019). A complete Tianxia experience: Interaction among Song, Liao, Xia, Jin, and Yuan, Beijing Normal University Press.] 唐世平（2018）。眾人皆吾師。天津：天津人民出版社。[Tang, Shiping. (2018). Everyone is my teacher, Tianjin People's Publishing House.] 徐進、杜哲元（2014）。反思中國外交政策研究中的思維定勢。國際政治科學，(3)，1–32。[Xu, Jin & Du, Zheyuan. (2014). Rethinking cognitive constraints in Chinese foreign policy studies. International Political Science, (3), 1–32.] 秦亞青（2013）。全球治理失靈與秩序理念的重建。世界經濟與政治，（4），4–18。[Qin, Yaqing. (2013). Governance failure and reconstruction of order ideas in global governance, World Economics and Politics, (4), 4–18.] 高明士（2008）。天下秩序與文化圈的探索。上海：上海古籍出版社。[Gao, Mingshi. (2008). Exploration of the Tianxia order and cultural spheres, Shanghai Ancient Books Publishing House.] 高鵬（2021）。中國古代「天下主義」實踐的歷史軌跡和戰略形態。世界經濟與政治論壇，(2)，21–37。[Gao, Peng. (2021). Historical trajectory and strategic forms of ancient Chinese Tianxia-ism in practice, Forum of World Economics and Politics, (2), 21–37.] 張登及（2011）。外交戰略與國際地位。收入王振寰、湯京平、宋國誠（主編），中國大陸暨兩岸關係研究（頁421–450）。台北：巨流出版社。[Zhang, Deng-ji. (2011). Foreign strategy and international status. In Wang Zhenhuan, Tang Jingping & Song Guocheng (Eds.), Mainland China and Cross-Strait Relations Studies (pp. 421–450). Taipei: Chuliu.] 張登及、陳瑩羲（2012）。朝貢體系再現與「天下體系」的興起？中國外交的案例研究與理論反思。中國大陸研究，55(4)，89–123。[Chang, Teng-chi & Chen, Ying-hsi. (2012). Reappearance of the tribute system and the rise of the “Tianxia system”? Case studies and theoretical reflections on China’s diplomacy, Mainland China Studies, 55(4), 89–123.] 張鋒（2010）。解構朝貢體系。國際政治科學，（2），33。[Zhang, Feng. (2010). Deconstructing the tribute system, International Political Science, (2), 33.] 張鋒（2023）。世界秩序的「天下」論，收入干春松、安樂哲（編），重思天下（頁389–438）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。[Zhang, Feng. (2023). On Tianxia theory of world order. In Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (Eds.), Rethinking Tianxia (pp. 389–438), City University of Hong Kong Press.] 張曉通、郝念東、王優酉（2021）。美歐對RCEP的地緣經濟認知及其政策調整。東北亞論壇，30(4)，82–94。[Zhang, Xiaotong, Hao, Niandong, & Wang, Youyou. (2021). Geoeconomic perceptions of RCEP by the US and Europe and their policy responses. Northeast Asia Forum, 30(4), 82–94.] 張勵、黎亞洲（2024）。RCEP成員國的認知差異及其影響。現代國際關係，(1)，101–118。[Zhang, Li, & Li, Yazhou. (2024). Cognitive differences among RCEP members and their implications. Modern International Relations, (1), 101–118.] 梁治平（2018）。想像「天下」：當代中國的意識形態構建。思想，(36)，71–177。[Liang, Zhiping. (2018). Imagining "Tianxia": Ideological construction in contemporary China, Thought, (36), 71–177.] 章百家（2002）。改變自己 影響世界——20世紀中國外交基本線索芻議。中國社會科學，(1)，4–19+205。[Zhang, Baijia. (2002). Changing oneself and influencing the world: A preliminary analysis of China's diplomatic strategy in the 20th century. Social Sciences in China, (1), 4–19+205.] 習近平外交思想和新時代中國外交（2025）。外交論述專題：新型國際關係多邊外交，聯合國，2025年。http://cn.chinadiplomacy.org.cn/node_8025034.shtml [Xi Jinping Thought on Diplomacy and China's Diplomacy in the New Era. (2025). Special Topic on Diplomatic Discourse: New-Type International Relations and Multilateral Diplomacy, United Nations.] 許紀霖（2013）。多元文明時代的中國使命。文化縱橫，（6），87。[Xu, Jilin. (2013). China's mission in a pluralistic civilizational era, Beijing Cultural Review, (6), 87.] 許紀霖（2015）。新天下主義：重建中國的內外秩序。收入知識分子論叢（第13輯），上海：上海人民出版社。[Xu, Jilin. (2015). New Tianxia-ism: Rebuilding China's internal and external order. In Intellectual Series, Vol. 13, Shanghai People's Publishing House.] 郭樹勇（2024）。從文化天下主義到文化國際主義：中國古代國際關係理論嬗變的一種考察。國際觀察，(1)，1–47。[Guo, Shuyong. (2024). From cultural Tianxia-ism to cultural internationalism: The evolution of China’s ancient international relations theory, International Review, (1), 1–47.] 陳積敏、孫新平（2022）。新時代中國外交發揚鬥爭精神的戰略思考。和平與發展，(2)，1–17。[Chen, Jimin & Sun, Xinping. (2022). Strategic thinking on China’s diplomatic struggle in the new era. Peace and Development, (2), 1–17.] 彭建英（2004）。中國古代羈縻政策的演變。北京：中國社會科學出版社。[Peng, Jianying. (2004). The evolution of ancient China’s Jimi policy, China Social Sciences Press.] 曾向紅（2021）。上海合作組織：實踐與理論。中國社會科學出版社。[Zeng, Xianghong. (2021). The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Practice and Theory. China Social Sciences Press.] 渡邊信一郎（2000）。天空的王座：中國古代帝國的朝政和禮儀。東京：柏書房。[Watanabe, Shinichiro. (2000). The throne of heaven: Government and ritual in ancient Chinese empires, Hakusuisha.] 游啟明（2021）。共同社會化與中國的國際秩序戰略。國際展望，13(2)，65–83。[You, Qiming. (2021). Shared socialization and China’s international order strategy. China International Strategy Review, 13(2), 65–83.] 游覽（2024）。對抗與革命：冷戰與越南的印支戰爭。開明書店。[You, Lan. (2024). Resistance and Revolution: The Cold War and Vietnam's Indochina War. Kaiming Bookstore.] 程映虹（2008）。毛主義革命：二十世紀的中國與世界。田園書屋，。[Cheng, Yinghong. (2008). Maoist Revolution: China and the World in the 20th Century. Field & Garden Press, pp. 59–101.] 黃玉順（2016）。「以身為本」與「大同主義」——「家國天下」話語反思與「天下主義」觀念批判。探索與爭鳴，(1)。[Huang, Yushun. (2016). Embodied Foundation and Datong-ism: Reflections on the Discourse of Family-Nation-Tianxia and a Critique of Tianxiaism. Exploration and Free Views, (1).] 黃俊傑（2002）。中國思想史中“身體觀”研究的新視野。中國文哲研究集刊，(20)，541–564。[Huang, Chun-chieh. (2002). New Perspectives on the Concept of the Body in Chinese Intellectual History. Bulletin of the Institute of Chinese Literature and Philosophy, (20), 541–564.] 楊光斌（2023）。中國“天下觀”與西方“國際觀”——兼論人類文明新形態的世界觀。社會科學，(11)，5–24。[Yang, Guangbin. (2023). China’s Tianxia Vision and the Western International Vision: On the Worldview of a New Form of Human Civilization. Social Sciences, (11), 5–24.] 楊潔勉（2021）。中國共產黨百年外交理論的哲學底蘊和戰略思維。國際觀察，(4)，1–17。[Yang, Jiemian. (2021). The philosophical and strategic logic of the CPC's diplomatic theory over the past century. International Review, (4), 1–17.] 楊儒賓（1993）。中國古代思想史中的氣論與身體觀。台北：巨流圖書公司。[Yang, Rubin. (1993). Qi Theory and the Body in Ancient Chinese Intellectual History. Taipei: Chuliu Book Company.] 溫鐵軍（2004）。解構現代化：溫鐵軍演講錄。廣東人民出版社 [Wen, Tiejun. (2004). Deconstructing Modernization: Selected Speeches of Wen Tiejun. Guangdong People's Publishing House.] 當代世界記者（2006）。成效顯著前途光明：專訪上海合作組織秘書長張德廣。當代世界，(6)，4–6。[Reporter of Contemporary World. (2006). Remarkable Achievements and a Bright Future: Interview with SCO Secretary-General Zhang Deguang. Contemporary World, (6), 4–6.] 葛兆光（2015）。對「天下」的想像：一個烏托邦想像背後的政治、思想與學術。思想，(9)，1–56。[Ge, Zhaoguang. (2015). The imagination of "Tianxia": The politics, thought, and academia behind a utopian idea, Sixiang, (9), 1–56.] 葛兆光（2017）。異想天開：近年來大陸新儒學的政治訴求。思想，(33)，241–284。[Ge, Zhaoguang. (2017). Wild Imaginings: The Political Aspirations of Mainland New Confucianism in Recent Years. Sixiang, (33), 241–284.] 管傳靖（2024）。功能化和安全化：大國戰略競爭與亞太經濟合作的雙向演進。亞太安全與海洋研究，2024(1)，60–80。[Guan, Chuanjing. (2024). Functionalization and securitization: The dual evolution of great power competition and Asia-Pacific economic cooperation. Asia-Pacific Security and Maritime Studies, 2024(1), 60–80.] 趙可金（2019）。全球和平的中國方案。五洲傳播出版社 [Zhao, Kejin. (2019). China’s Proposal for Global Peace. China Intercontinental Press.] 趙汀陽（2005）。天下體系：世界制度哲學導論。南京：江蘇教育出版社。[Zhao, Tingyang. (2005). The Tianxia system: A philosophy for world institutions, Jiangsu Education Press.] 趙汀陽（2011）。天下體系。中國人民大學出版社 [Zhao, Tingyang. (2011). The Tianxia System. Renmin University Press.] 趙汀陽（2014）。兩面之詞：關於革命問題的通信（頁35–50）。北京：中信出版社。[Zhao, Tingyang. (2014). Two-faced words: Correspondence on the question of revolution (pp. 35–50), China CITIC Press.] 趙汀陽（2016）。天下的當代性。北京：中信出版社。[Zhao, Tingyang. (2016). The contemporaneity of Tianxia, China CITIC Press.] 趙汀陽（2023）。天下究竟是什麼？收入干春松、安樂哲（編），重思天下（頁103–132）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。[Zhao, Tingyang. (2023). What exactly is Tianxia? In Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (Eds.), Rethinking Tianxia (pp. 103–132), City University of Hong Kong Press.] 趙京蘭（2023）。天下秩序和儒教普遍主義的重組可能性。收入干春松、安樂哲（編），重思天下（頁195–230）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。[Zhao, Jinglan. (2023). Possibilities for restructuring the Tianxia order and Confucian universalism. In Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (Eds.), Rethinking Tianxia (pp. 195–230), City University of Hong Kong Press.] 劉擎（2015）。重建全球想像：從「天下」走向新世界主義。學術月刊，(8)，5–15。[Liu, Qing. (2015). Rebuilding global imagination: From Tianxia to new cosmopolitanism, Academic Monthly, (8), 5–15.] 潘光（2014）。穩步前進的上海合作組織。時事出版社。[Pan, Guang. (2014). Steady Progress of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Current Affairs Press.] 蔡孟翰（2017）。論天下：先秦關於「天下」的政治想像與論述。文化縱橫，(2)，60–72。[Tsai, Meng-han. (2017). On Tianxia: Political imagination and discourse of Tianxia in pre-Qin China, Beijing Cultural Review, (2), 60–72.] 鄭宗義（2023）。評論趙汀陽〈天下究竟是什麼？〉收入干春松、安樂哲（編），重思天下（頁133–148）。香港：香港城市大學出版社。[Cheng, Tsung-yi. (2023). A comment on Zhao Tingyang’s “What exactly is Tianxia?”, In Gan, Chunsong & Ames, Roger T. (Eds.), Rethinking Tianxia (pp. 133–148), City University of Hong Kong Press.] 錢穆（1998a）。錢賓四先生全集，第18冊。台北：聯經出版事業公司。[Qian, Mu. (1998a). The Complete Works of Master Qian Binsi, Vol. 18. Taipei: Linking Publishing Company.] 錢穆（1998b）。錢賓四先生全集，第29冊。台北：聯經出版事業公司。[Qian, Mu. (1998b). The Complete Works of Master Qian Binsi, Vol. 29. Taipei: Linking Publishing Company.] 羅會琳、張勵（2023）。斂合與分裂：理解亞太區域經濟秩序的雙重維度。太平洋學報，31(3)，68–80。[Luo, Huilin, & Zhang, Li. (2023). Convergence and division: Understanding the dual dimensions of Asia-Pacific regional economic order. Pacific Journal, 31(3), 68–80.] 赖昶、李昕蕾（2024）。《區域全面經濟夥伴關係協定》與東盟中心地位的維繫——基於實踐視角的考察。南洋問題研究，(1)，27–44。[Lai, Chang, & Li, Xinlei. (2024). The maintenance of ASEAN centrality under RCEP: A practice-based examination. Southeast Asian Studies, (1), 27–44.] 閻學通、秦亞青、倪樂雄、李強、張文木（2004）。「大國崛起與中國的選擇」筆談。中國社會科學，(5)，51–63。[Yan, Xuetong et al. (2004). Symposium on great power rise and China's choices. Social Sciences in China, (5), 51–63.] Abbott, Kenneth W., & Keohane, Robert O., & Moravcsik, Andrew, & Slaughter, Anne-Marie, & Snidal, Duncan. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419. Acharya, Amitav, & Adler, Emanuel, & Barnett, Michael. (1996). A regional security community in Southeast Asia?; A framework for the study of security communities. In Ball, D. (Ed.), The transformation of security in the Asia/Pacific region (pp. 175–200). Frank Cass. Acharya, Amitav. (2004). How ideas spread, whose norms matter? Norm localization and institutional change in Asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239–275. Acharya, Amitav. (2017). After Liberal Hegemony: The Advent of a Multiplex World Order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271–285. Acharya, Amitav. (2018). The End of American World Order. Polity Press. Acharya, Amitav. (2023). Before the Nation-State: Civilizations, World Orders, and the Origins of Global International Relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 16(3), 263–288. Adler, Emanuel, & Barnett, Michael. (1998). A framework for the study of security communities. In Adler, Emanuel, & Barnett, Michael (Eds.), Security Communities (pp. 29–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Adler, Emanuel, & Pouliot, Vincent. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36. Alexander, Robert Jackson. (1999). International Maoism in the Developing World. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger. Alexandroff, Alan, & Stein, Arthur. (2017). The trap in “The Thucydides trap”: Framing US-China relations. Global Policy. Allison, Graham. (2017). Destined for War: Can America and China escape Thucydides’s Trap. Houghton Mifflin. Amable, Dennis Senam. (2022). Theorizing the emergence of security regions: An adaptation for the regional security complex theory. Global Studies Quarterly, 2(4). Amineh, Mehdi Parvizi (Ed.). (2022). The China-led Belt and Road Initiative and its reflections: The crisis of hegemony and changing global orders. Routledge. Ang, Yuen Yuen. (2016). How China escaped the poverty trap. Cornell University Press. Aris, Stephen. (2011). Euroasian Regionalism: The Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. Ayoob, Mohammed. (2002). Inequality and theorizing in international relations: The case for subaltern realism. International Studies Review, 4(3), 27–48. Babones, Salvatore. (2017). American Tianxia: Chinese money, American power and the end of history. Bristol: Policy Press. Baldwin, David. (1993). Neorealism and neoliberalism: The contemporary debate. Columbia University Press, 4–17. Barnett, Michael, & Duvall, Raymond (Eds.). (2005). Power in Global Governance. Cambridge University Press. Beckley, Michael. (2015). The myth of entangling alliances: Reassessing the security risks of US defense pacts. International Security, 39(4), 7–48. Behera, Navnita Chadha. (2020). State and sovereignty. In Tickner, Arlene B., & Smith, Karen (Eds.), International Relations from the Global South: Worlds of Difference (pp. 139–160). Routledge. Benabdallah, Lina. (2019). Contesting the international order by integrating it: The case of China’s Belt and Road Initiative. Third World Quarterly, 40(1), 92–108. Blaney, David L. (1996). Reconceptualizing Autonomy: The Difference Dependency Theory Makes. Review of International Political Economy, 3(3), 459–497. Blower, Brooke L. (2014). From isolationism to neutrality: A new framework for understanding American political culture, 1919–1941. Diplomatic History, 38(2), 345–376. Bolinaga, Luciano Damián. (2022). From the Washington Consensus to the Beijing Consensus: Latin America facing the rise of China as a great power. In Rofel, Lisa, & Rojas, Carlos (Eds.), New World Orderings: China and the Global South (pp. 38–57). Duke University Press. Brands, Hal. (2018). American grand strategy in the age of Trump. Brookings Institution Press. Braveboy-Wagner, Jacqueline Anne (Ed.). (2016). Diplomatic Strategies of Nations in the Global South: The Search for Leadership. Palgrave Macmillan. Braveboy-Wagner, Jacqueline Anne. (2016). Introduction: Rise of Which Global South States?. In Braveboy-Wagner, Jacqueline Anne (Ed.), Diplomatic Strategies of Nations in the Global South: The Search for Leadership (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan US. Breslin, Shaun (Ed.). (2012). A handbook of China’s international relations. New York: Routledge. Breslin, Shaun. (2013). China and the global order: signalling threat or friendship. International Affairs, 89(3), 615–634. Bunskoek, Raoul, & Shih, Chih-yu. (2021). ‘Community of common destiny’ as post-Western regionalism: Rethinking China’s Belt and Road Initiative from a Confucian perspective. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, 18(70), 85–101. Buzan, Barry, & Hansen, Lene. (2009). The evolution of international security studies. Cambridge University Press. Buzan, Barry, & Wæver, Ole, & De Wilde, Jaap. (1998). Security: A new framework for analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers. Buzan, Barry. (1983). People, states and fear. University of North Carolina Press. Buzan, Barry. (2003). Regions and powers: The structure of international security. Cambridge University Press. Buzan, Barry. (2010). China in international society: Is ‘peaceful rise’ possible? The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 3(1), 5–36. Cai, Yuqian. (2022). Chinese thinking on regional governance: Open regionalism and moral leadership. In Hoo, Tiang Boon, & McKinney, Jared Morgan (Eds.), Chinese regionalism in Asia (pp. 29–43). Routledge. Callahan, William A. (2007). Tianxia, empire and the world: Soft power and China’s foreign policy discourse in the 21st century, British Inter-University China Centre Working Paper Series, 1(2). Campbell, Kurt M., and Ratner, Ely. (2018). The China reckoning: How Beijing defied American expectations. Foreign Affairs, 97(2), 60–70. Cha, Victor D. (2009). Powerplay: Origins of the U.S. alliance system in Asia. International Security, 34(3), 158–196. Chakrabarty, Dipesh. (2000). Provincializing Europe. Princeton University Press. Chang, Teng-Chi. (2020). Governing inter-ethnical/international order for China: A comparison of Tang’s mollification system and Qing’s Mongolian Banner System. Asian Ethnicity, 21(2), 305–319. China Daily. (2019). Belt and Road cooperation: Shaping a brighter shared future. China Daily, April 28, 2019. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2019-04/28/content_37463364.htm Chirathivat, Suthiphand, Rutchatorn, Buddhagarn, & Devendrakumar, Anupama. (2022). China’s Belt and Road Initiative and its implications for ASEAN: An introduction. In Chirathivat, Suthiphand et al. (Eds.), China’s Belt and Road Initiative in ASEAN (pp. 1–22). Routledge. Chun, Lin. (2017). China’s Lost World of Internationalism. In Wang, Ban (Ed.), Chinese visions of world order: Tianxia, culture, and world politics, 177-211. Chong, Alan. (2010). Small state soft power strategies: Virtual enlargement in the cases of the Vatican City State and Singapore. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 23(3), 383–405. Christensen, Thomas J. (2006). Fostering stability or creating a monster? The rise of China and US policy toward East Asia. International Security, 31(1), 81–126. Cooley, Alexander. (2017). Whose Rules, Whose Sphere?: Russian Governance and Influence in Post-Soviet States. Washington DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Dados, Nour, & Connell, Raewyn. (2012). The global south. Contexts, 11(1), 12–13. Denoon, David B.H. (Ed.). (2021). China’s grand strategy: A roadmap to global power? NYU Press, pp. 1–16. Deutsch, Karl W. (1957). Political community and the North Atlantic area. Princeton University Press; Deutsch, Karl W. (1961). Security communities. In Rosenau, J. (Ed.), International politics and foreign policy. Free Press. Doshi, Rush. (2021). The long game: China's grand strategy to displace American order. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Dreyer, June Teufel. (2015). The “Tianxia trope”: Will China change the international system? Journal of Contemporary China, 24(96), 1015–1031. Dueck, Colin. (2008). Reluctant Crusaders. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Dwivedi, Kartikeya, & Bawa, Amika. (2022). Prospects of the evolving SCO mandate: From a security focus towards an increased economic and strategic partnership with India. In Marochkin, Sergey, & Bezborodov, Yury (Eds.), The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Exploring New Horizons (pp. 197–213). Routledge. Elvin, Mark. (1972). The high-level equilibrium trap: The causes of the decline of invention in the traditional Chinese textile industries. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Elvin, Mark. (1973). The pattern of the Chinese past. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Fairbank, John K., & Teng, Ssu-yu. (1941). On the Ch’ing tributary system. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 6(2), 135–246. Fairbank, John K., and Feuerwerker, Albert, eds. (1986). The Cambridge History of China Volume 12: Republican China, 1912–1949, Part 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 1–73. Fairbank, John King. (1983). The United States and China. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Fanon, Frantz. (1963). The Wretched of the Earth. Grove Press. Farnham, Barbara. (1997). Roosevelt and the Munich Crisis. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Feng, Huiyun & He, Kai. (2017). China’s institutional challenges to the international order. Strategic Studies Quarterly, 11(4), 23–49. Finnemore, Martha, & Sikkink, Kathryn. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. Garlick, Jeremy. (2019). The impact of China’s Belt and Road Initiative: From Asia to Europe. Routledge. Geertz, Clifford. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books. Gerring, John. (2006). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices. Cambridge University Press. Glaser, Charles L. (1997). The security dilemma revisited. World Politics, 50(1), 171–201. Glawe, Linda, & Wagner, Helmut. (2016). The middle-income trap: Definitions, theories and countries concerned—A literature survey. Comparative Economic Studies, 58, 507–538. Goldstein, Avery. (2020). China's grand strategy under Xi Jinping: Reassurance, reform, and resistance. International Security, 45(1), 164–201. Goldstein, Judith, & Keohane, Robert O. (Eds.). (1993). Ideas and foreign policy: Beliefs, institutions, and political change. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Gong, Xue. (2022). Weathering the storm?: RCEP, Chinese regionalism, and great power competition. In Hoo, Tiang Boon, & McKinney, Jared Morgan (Eds.), Chinese Regionalism in Asia (pp. 44–56). Routledge. Haas, Mark L. (2005). The ideological origins of great power politics, 1789–1989. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Hala, Martin. (2018). Forging a New ‘Eastern Bloc’. Journal of Democracy, 29(2), 83–89. He, Baogang. (2020). Regionalism as an instrument for global power contestation: The case of China. Asian Studies Review, 44(1), 79–96. He, Jiajie, & Acharya, Amitav. (2022). China, globalization, and the advent of the multiplex order: Case studies of BRI and AIIB. In Chirathivat, Suthiphand et al. (Eds.), China’s Belt and Road Initiative in ASEAN (pp. 23–50). Routledge. Held, David, & McGrew, Anthony. (2007). Globalization/anti-globalization: Beyond the great divide. Cambridge: Polity. Herrmann, Richard, and Lebow, Richard Ned, eds. (2004). Ending the Cold War: Interpretations, Causation and the Study of International Relations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Hobson, John M. (2020). Globalization. In Smith, Karen, & Tickner, Arlene B. (Eds.), International Relations from the Global South (pp. 221–239). Routledge. Hong, Yu. (2022). Establishment of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Is China taking a leadership role in regionalism in Asia? In Hoo, Tiang Boon, & McKinney, Jared Morgan (Eds.), Chinese regionalism in Asia (pp. 73–90). Routledge. Hoo, Tiang Boon, & McKinney, Jared Morgan (Eds.). (2022). Chinese regionalism in Asia: Beyond the Belt and Road Initiative. Taylor & Francis. Horesh, Niv, & Kavalski, Emilian. (2014). Asian thought on China’s changing international relations. Palgrave. Hou, Changkun. (2023). The sovereign's dilemma and the rise and fall of imperial China: Can the Tianzi represent the Tianxia? Chinese Political Science Review, 8, 325–330. Hou, Changkun. (2025). The involution in international relations: A comparative study of Tianxiaism and liberalism. Chinese Political Science Review. (online) Ikenberry, G. John, & Kupchan, Charles A. (1990). Socialization and hegemonic power. International Organization, 44(3), 283–315. Ikenberry, G. John. (1996). The future of international leadership. Political Science Quarterly, 111(3), 385–402. Ikenberry, G. John. (2011). Liberal leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton University Press. Ikenberry, G. John. (2019). After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton University Press. Imran, Muhammad, Ali, Murad, & Janjua, Muhammad Saleem. (2021). Urban development challenges under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC). In Sintusingha, Sidh et al. (Eds.), International Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative: A Bottom-Up Approach (pp. 81–99). Routledge. Jackson, Robert, & Sørensen, Georg. (2013). Introduction to international relations: Theories and approaches. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Jacob, Jabin T. (2020). China’s Belt and Road Initiative in South Asia: Unique characteristics and general framework. In Fulton, Jonathan (Ed.), Regions in the Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 36–53). Routledge. Jacques, Martin. (2009). When China Rules the World: The End of the Western World and the Birth of a New Global Order. Penguin. Jacques, Martin. (2012). When China rules the world: The rise of the Middle Kingdom and the end of the Western world. London: Penguin UK. Jenks, Bruce. (2016). UN development cooperation. In Jenks, Bruce, & Topping, David (Eds.), Global Governance and Development (pp. 136–167). Routledge. Jervis, Robert. (1978). Cooperation under the security dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214. Jervis, Robert. (1982). Security regimes. International Organization, 36(2), 357–378; Jervis, Robert. (1985). From balance to concert: A study of international security cooperation. World Politics, 38(1), 58–79. Johnston, Alastair Iain. (2003). Is China a status quo power? International Security, 27(4), 5–56. Johnston, Alastair Iain. (2013). How new and assertive is China's new assertiveness? International Security, 37(4), 7–48. Johnston, Alastair Iain. (2019). China in a world of orders: Rethinking compliance and challenge in Beijing's international relations. International Security, 44(2), 9–60. Joyaux, François. (2022). Nouvelle histoire de l'Indochine français. Perrin. Kaczmarski, Marcin. (2017). Non-western visions of regionalism: China’s New Silk Road and Russia’s Eurasian Economic Union. International Affairs, 93(6), 1357–1376. Kaleji, Vali. (2021). The Shanghai Cooperation Organization Is No ‘New Warsaw’ or ‘Eastern NATO’. The National Interest, November 13. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/shanghai-cooperation-organization-no-new-warsaw-or-eastern-nato-196138 Kang, David C. (2003). Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks. International Security, 27(4), 57–85. Kang, David C., & Shambaugh, David. (2004). Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks; China engages Asia: Reshaping the regional order. International Security, 27(4), 57–85; International Security, 29(3), 64–99. Katzenstein, Peter (Ed.). (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press. Kavalski, Emilian. (2012). The myth of assertive posturing. Harvard Asia Quarterly, 14(2), 46–51. Kavalski, Emilian. (2015). Complexifying IR. In Kavalski, Emilian (Ed.), World politics at the edge of chaos (pp. 253–271). State University of New York Press. Kavalski, Emilian. (2016). China: A relational normative power. Review of Global Politics, 1(3), 15. Kavalski, Emilian. (2019). China in Central and Eastern Europe: The unintended effects of identity narratives. Asia Europe Journal, 17(4); Kavalski, Emilian. (2020). Localizing China’s global Silk Roads through the “17+1”. In Fulton, Jonathan (Ed.), Regions in the Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 16–35). London: Routledge. Keck, Margaret, & Sikkink, Kathryn. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization, 52(4), 887–917. Keohane, Robert O. (1989). International institutions and state power: Essays in international relations theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Keohane, Robert O. (2005). After hegemony: Cooperation and discord in the world political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Keohane, Robert O., & Nye, Joseph S. (1977). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. HarperCollins. Keohane, Robert O., & Nye, Joseph S. (1989). Power and interdependence: World politics in transition. Boston: Little, Brown. Khan, Haider. (2023). War and Peace in East Asia: Avoiding Thucydides’s Trap with China as a Rising Power. University Library of Munich. Khong, Yuen Foong. (2013). The American tributary system. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 6(1), 1–47. Kindleberger, Charles P. (1986). The world in depression, 1929–1939. University of California Press. Kirton, John J. (2016). China’s G20 Leadership. Routledge. Kitchen, Nicholas. (2010). Systemic pressures and domestic ideas: A neoclassical realist model of grand strategy formation. Review of International Studies, 36(1), 117–135. Klotz, Audie. (1995). Norms in international relations: The struggle against apartheid. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Koga, Kei. (2022). Managing great power politics: ASEAN, institutional strategy, and the South China Sea. Springer Nature. Koremenos, Barbara, & Lipson, Charles, & Snidal, Duncan. (2001). The rational design of international institutions. International Organization, 55(4), 761–799. Kraft, Herman Joseph S. (2017). Great power dynamics and the waning of ASEAN centrality in regional security. Asian Politics & Policy, 9(4), 597–612. Krapohl, Sebastian, & Vasileva-Dienes, Alexandra. (2020). The region that isn't: China, Russia and the failure of regional integration in Central Asia. Asia Europe Journal, 18(3), 347–366. Kratochwil, Friedrich V., & Ruggie, John Gerard. (1986). The state of the art on an art of the state. International Organization, 40(4), 753–775. Kupchan, Charles. (1994). The vulnerability of empire. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Kurian, Nimmi. (2004). Fungible borders and informal regionalism: Rethinking China’s international relations. East Asia, 21(1), 7. Kuteleva, Anna. (2022). Images and models of China-led South-South cooperation: What does rising China offer to the Global South?. In Tudoroiu, Theodor, & Kuteleva, Anna (Eds.), China in the Global South: Impact and Perceptions (pp. 9–22). Springer Nature Singapore. Lake, David A., & Martin, Lisa L., & Risse, Thomas. (2021). Challenges to the liberal order: Reflections on International Organization. International Organization, 75(2), 225–257. Lake, David. (1997). Regional security complexes: A systems approach. In Lake, D., & Morgan, P. (Eds.), Regional orders (pp. 45–67). Pennsylvania State University Press. Legrenzi, Matteo, & Lawson, Fred H. (2018). Regional security complexes and organizations. In The Oxford handbook of international security (pp. 202–230). Oxford University Press. Lewis, Mark Edward, & Hsieh, Mei-yu. (2017). Tianxia and the invention of empire in East Asia. In Wang, Ban (Ed.), Chinese visions of world order: Tianxia, culture, and world politics. Li, Mingjiang (Ed.). (2017). China's economic statecraft: Co-optation, cooperation and coercion. World Scientific. Ling, Lily H. M., & Pinheiro, Carolina M. (2020). South–South Talk. In Smith, Karen, & Tickner, Arlene B. (Eds.), International Relations from the Global South (pp. 317–340). Routledge. Ling, Lily H.M. (2019). Three-ness. Politics, 39(1), 35–49. Ling, Lily H.M. (2014). The Dao of World Politics: Towards a Post-Westphalian, Worldist International Relations. Routledge. Liu, Lina. (2021). Beyond the status quo and revisionism: An analysis of the role of China and the approaches of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to the global order. Asian Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 88–109. Lovell, Julia. (2019). Maoism: A Global History. Random House. MacFarquhar, Roderick, & Fairbank, John K., eds. (1987). The Cambridge History of China Volume 14: The People's Republic, Part 1, The Emergence of Revolutionary China, 1949–1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. MacFarquhar, Roderick, & Fairbank, John K., eds. (1991). The Cambridge History of China Volume 15: The People's Republic, Part 2, Revolutions within the Chinese Revolution, 1966–1982. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 218–302. MacHaffie, James. (2021). Mutual trust without a strong collective identity? Examining the Shanghai Cooperation Organization as a nascent security community. Asian Security, 17(3), 349–365. Magno, Francisco A., & Vivo, Martin Josef E. (2023). Negotiating RCEP: The role of ASEAN in middle-power diplomacy. China and WTO Review, 9(1). Marácz, László. (2022). An assessment of the Hungarian partnership in the Chinese Belt and Road Initiative. In Amineh, Mehdi Parvizi (Ed.), The China-led Belt and Road Initiative and its reflections (pp. 132–157). Routledge. Mastro, Oriana Skylar. (2019). The stealth superpower: How China hid its global ambitions. Foreign Affairs, 98(1), 31–39. Mattern, Janice Bially. (2005). Ordering international politics: Identity, crisis, and representational force. New York: Routledge. McKinney, Jared Morgan, & Hoo, Tiang Boon. (2022). Reglobalization, nationalism, and regionalism: Chinese choices. In Hoo, Tiang Boon, & McKinney, Jared Morgan (Eds.), Chinese Regionalism in Asia (pp. 1–11). Routledge. Mead, George Herbert. (1934). Mind, self, and society from the standpoint of a social behaviorist. University of Chicago Press. Mearsheimer, John J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Mearsheimer, John J. (2018). The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. Yale University Press. Mearsheimer, John J., & Walt, Stephen M. (2016). The case for offshore balancing: A superior US grand strategy. Foreign Affairs, 95. Mearsheimer, John. (2006). China's unpeaceful rise. Current History, 105(690), 160–162. Medeiros, Evan S. (2019). The changing fundamentals of U.S.-China relations. The Washington Quarterly, 42(3), 93–119. Mengzi. (2010). Mengzi, trans. Yong Fang. Beijing: Zhonghua Book. Mikhaylenko, Ekaterina, Ospanova, Aigerim, & Lagutina, Maria. (2022). The SCO and security cooperation. In Marochkin, Sergey, & Bezborodov, Yury (Eds.), The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Exploring New Horizons (pp. 38–52). Routledge. Mitzen, Jennifer. (2006). Ontological security in world politics: State identity and the security dilemma. European Journal of International Relations, 12(3), 341–370. Moravcsik, Andrew. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513–553. Morgenthau, Hans J. (1948). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. Alfred A. Knopf. Murphy, Dawn C. (2022). China's Rise in the Global South: The Middle East, Africa, and Beijing's Alternative World Order. Stanford University Press. Murthy, Viren. (2017). Tianxia and post-war Japanese sinologists’ vision of the Chinese revolution: The cases of Nishi Junzo and Mizoguchi Yuzo. In Wang, Ban (Ed.), Chinese visions of world order: Tianxia, culture, and world politics, 149–176. Nogueira, Joao Pontes. (2020). Inequality. In Smith, Karen, & Tickner, Arlene B. (Eds.), International Relations from the Global South (pp. 240–258). Routledge. Nye, Joseph S. & Donahue, John D. (Eds.). (2000). Governance in a Globalizing World. Rowman & Littlefield. Nye, Joseph S. (1988). Neorealism and neoliberalism. World Politics, 40(2), 235–251. Ocampo, José Antonio. (2016). Global economic and social governance and the United Nations system. In Jenks, Bruce, & Topping, David (Eds.), Global Governance and Development (pp. 3–31). Routledge. Oertel, Aslı Aydıntaşbaş, Dumoulin, Marie, Geranmayeh, Ellie, & Janka. (2022). Rogue NATO: The new face of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation. ECFR, September 16. https://ecfr.eu/article/rogue-nato-the-new-face-of-the-shanghai-cooperation-organisation/ Oldani, Chiara, & Wouters, Jan (Eds.). (2019). The G7, Anti-globalism and the Governance of Globalization. Routledge. Öniş, Ziya, & Kutlay, Mustafa. (2020). The new age of hybridity and clash of norms: China, BRICS, and challenges of global governance in a postliberal international order. Alternatives, 45(3), 123–142. Organski, Abramo F. K. (1958). World politics. Knopf. Panova, Victoria V. (2018). The BRICS security agenda: Russia’s approach and the outcomes of the Ufa Summit. In Roberts, Cynthia (Ed.), BRICS and Global Governance (pp. 129–149). Routledge. Paradise, James F. (2019). China's quest for global economic governance reform. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24(3), 471–493. Peimani, Hooman. (2022). Strategic alliance or cooperation of convenience: Iran's linking the Chinese and Russian transit routes to connect Asia to Europe. In Amineh, Mehdi Parvizi (Ed.), The China-led Belt and Road Initiative and its reflections (pp. 209–243). Routledge. Porshneva, Olga, Rakhimov, Mirzokhid, & Razinkov, Sergey. (2022). The formation and institutional development of the SCO: Historical and legal aspects. In Marochkin, Sergey, & Bezborodov, Yury (Eds.), The Shanghai Cooperation Organization: Exploring New Horizons (pp. 9–24). Routledge. Posen, Barry R. (2018). Restraint: A new foundation for US grand strategy. Cornell University Press. Putnam, Robert. (1988). The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(Summer), 427–460. Pye, Lucian W., & Pye, Mary W. (1985). Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Reus-Smit, Christian. (1999). The moral purpose of the state: Culture, social identity, and institutional rationality in international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Riker, William. (1986). The Art of Political Manipulation. New Haven: Yale University Press. Ringmar, Eric. (1996). Identity, interest and action: A cultural explanation of Sweden’s intervention in the Thirty Years’ War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Ripsman, Norrin M., Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., & Lobell, Steven E. (2016). Neoclassical realist theory of international politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rofel, Lisa. (2017). China’s Tianxia worldings: Socialist and post-socialist cosmopolitanisms. In Wang, Ban (Ed.), Chinese visions of world order: Tianxia, culture, and world politics, 212–234. Rojas, Carlos, & Rofel, Lisa. (2022). Introduction: Contact, communication, imagination, and strategies of worldmaking. In Rofel, Lisa, & Rojas, Carlos (Eds.), New world orderings: China and the Global South (pp. 1–18). Duke University Press. Rolland, Nadège. (2017). China’s Eurasian century: Political and strategic implications of the Belt and Road Initiative. The National Bureau of Asian Research. Rosenau, James N. (1995). Governance in the Twenty-first Century. Global Governance, 1(1), 13–43. Roy, Denny. (1994). Hegemon on the horizon? China's threat to East Asian security. International Security, 19(1), 149–168. Rudd, Kevin. (2015). U.S.-China 21, the Future of U.S.-China Relations under Xi Jinping: Toward a New Framework of Constructive Realism for a Common Purpose. Cambridge, MA: Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School. Schweller, Randall L. (2014). Maxwell's Demon and the Golden Apple: Global Discord in the New Millennium. JHU Press. Schweller, Randall. (2015). Rising powers and revisionism in emerging international orders. Valdai Papers, 16, 1–15. Scobell, Andrew, & Harold, Scott W. (2013). An “assertive” China? Insights from interviews. Asian Security, 9(2), 111–131. Shambaugh, David (Ed.). (2020). China and the world. Oxford University Press. Shambaugh, David. (2004). China engages Asia: Reshaping the regional order. International Security, 29(3), 64–99. Shambaugh, David. (2006). Return to the Middle Kingdom? China and Asia in the early twenty-first century. In Shambaugh, David (Ed.), Power shift: China and Asia’s new dynamics (pp. 23–47). University of California Press. Shih, Chih-yu & Kuo, Jason. (2024). A relational analysis of exceptionalism: Connecting liberalism with Confucian multilateralism and emotion. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 17(3), 242–261. Shih, Chih-yu. (2012). Assigning role characteristics to China: The role state versus the ego state. Foreign Policy Analysis, 8(1), 71–91. Shih, Chih-yu. (2022). Role and relation in Confucian IR: Relating to strangers in the states of nature. Review of International Studies, 48(5), 910–929. Shih, Chih-yu. (2024). Relations and Roles in China's Internationalism: Rediscovering Confucianism in a Pluriversal World. State University of New York Press. Sintusingha, Sidh, & Wu, Hao. (2021). International perspectives of the BRI: New, unfolding globalisation. In Sintusingha, Sidh, & Wu, Hao (Eds.), International Perspectives on the Belt and Road Initiative (pp. 299–321). Routledge. Skinner, George William. (1985). Presidential address: The structure of Chinese history. The Journal of Asian Studies, 44(2), 271–292. Slaughter, Steven. (2019). The Power of the G20: The Politics of Legitimacy in Global Governance. Routledge. Smith, Karen, & Tickner, Arlene B. (2020). Introduction: international relations from the global south. In Smith, Karen, & Tickner, Arlene B. (Eds.), International Relations from the Global South (pp. 1–14). Routledge. Smith, Karen. (2020). Order, ordering and disorder. In Smith, Karen, & Tickner, Arlene B. (Eds.), International Relations from the Global South (pp. 77–96). Routledge. Snyder, Jack. (1991). Myths of empire: Domestic politics and international ambition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. Steele, Brent J. (2008). Ontological security in international relations: Self-identity and the IR state. New York: Routledge. Stewart-Ingersoll, Robert, & Frazier, Derrick. (2012). Regional powers and security orders: A theoretical framework. Routledge. Strange, Susan. (1987). The persistent myth of lost hegemony. International Organization, 41(4), 551–574. Strange, Susan. (1988). States and Markets: An Introduction to International Political Economy. London: Pinter Publishers. Swaine, Michael D., & Telis, Ashley J. (2000). Interpreting China's Grand Strategy: Past, Present, and Future. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Tammen, Ronald L. (2000). Power transitions: Strategies for the 21st century. Chatham House. Thayer, Carl. (2016). Revealed: The truth behind ASEAN’s retracted Kunming statement. The Diplomat, June 19. https://thediplomat.com/2016/06/revealed-the-truth-behind-aseans-retracted-kunming-statement/ Tickner, Arlene B. (2020). War and conflict. In Tickner, Arlene B., & Smith, Karen (Eds.), International Relations from the Global South: Worlds of Difference (pp. 115–138). Routledge. Tickner, Arlene. (2003). Hearing Latin American Voices in International Relations Studies. International Studies Perspectives, 4, 325–350. Toje, Asle. (2008). America, the EU, and strategic culture: Renegotiating the transatlantic bargain. New York: Routledge. Toynbee, Arnold J. (1987). A study of history: Volume I: Abridgement of volumes I–VI. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks. Tudoroiu, Theodor. (2022). Normative power China, subnational agency, and structural factors in the Global South. In Tudoroiu, Theodor, & Kuteleva, Anna (Eds.), China in the Global South: Impact and Perceptions (pp. 259–288). Springer Nature Singapore. Vale, Peter, & Thakur, Vineet. (2020). IR and the making of the white man’s world. In Smith, Karen, & Tickner, Arlene B. (Eds.), International Relations from the Global South (pp. 56–73). Routledge. Vatanka, Alex. (2017). Iran’s Russian conundrum. Russia In The Middle East, October 5. https://jamestown.org/program/irans-russian-conundrum/ Väyrynen, Raimo. (2022). Stable peace through security communities? Steps towards theory-building. In Väyrynen, Raimo (Ed.), A pioneer in international relations: Scholarship and policy-making (pp. 357–359). Springer Nature. Vogel, Ezra F. (2011). Deng Xiaoping and the Transformation of China. Harvard University Press. Volland, Nicolai. (2022). Turning the tables on the Global North: China, Afro-Asia, and Cold War cultural diplomacy. In Rofel, Lisa, & Rojas, Carlos (Eds.), New World Orderings: China and the Global South (pp. 21–37). Duke University Press. Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Wang, Ban (Ed.). (2017). Chinese visions of world order: Tianxia, culture, and world politics. Durham: Duke University Press. Wang, Hui. (2017). From empire to state: Kang Youwei, Confucian universalism, and unity. In Wang, Ban (Ed.), Chinese visions of world order: Tianxia, culture, and world politics, 49-64. Wang, Jisi, & Roy, J. Stapleton, & Friedberg, Aaron, & Christensen, Thomas, & Kim, Patricia, Nye, & Joseph S., & Li, Eric, & Campbell, & Kurt M., & Ratner, Ely. (2018). Did America get China wrong? The engagement debate. Foreign Affairs, 97(4), 183–195. Weiss, Jessica Chen, & Wallace, Jeremy L. (2021). Domestic politics, China's rise, and the future of the liberal international order. International Organization, 75(2), 635–664. Wendt, Alexander. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. Wendt, Alexander. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. White, Hugh. (2013). The China choice: Why we should share power. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Wittfogel, Karl. (1959). Oriental despotism: A comparative study of total power. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Wyne, Ali. (2019). Questioning the Presumption of a US-China Power Transition. The Diplomat. Yan, Xuetong. (2021). Becoming strong: The new Chinese foreign policy. Foreign Affairs, 100, 40. Yan, Yunxiang. (1996). The flow of gifts: Reciprocity and social networks in a Chinese village. Stanford University Press. Yang, Lien-sheng. (1954). Toward a study of dynastic configurations in Chinese history. Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 17(3/4), 329–345. Yeo, Andrew. (2020). China’s rising assertiveness and the decline in the East Asian regionalism narrative. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 20(3), 445–475. Zarakol, Ayşe. (2022). Before the West: The rise and fall of Eastern world orders. Cambridge University Press. Zeng, Jinghan. (2020). Slogan politics: Understanding Chinese foreign policy concepts. Springer Nature. Zhang, Feng. (2010). The Tianxia system: World politics in a Chinese utopia. China Heritage Quarterly, (21). Zhang, Feng. (2013). The rise of Chinese exceptionalism in international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(2), 305–328. Zhao, Dingxin. (2015). The Confucian-Legalist state: A new theory of Chinese history. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Zhao, Kejin. (2021). Exploring China’s global strategy in the new era. China International Studies, (5). Zhao, Yinan. (2013). “‘Chinese Dream’ Is Xi's Vision.” China Daily, March 18. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2013npc/2013-03/18/content_16315025.htm Zheng, Bijian. (2005). China's peaceful rise: Speeches of Zheng Bijian, 1997–2005. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Zhu, Zhiqun. (2005). Power Transition and US-China Relations: Is War Inevitable? Journal of International and Area Studies, 2005, 1–24. Zürn, Michael. (2018). A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. Oxford University Press. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98965 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 圍繞天下主義是什麼，及相關的存在性和替代性問題，本研究以名分關係秩序的核心定義出發，回顧了天下主題相關的研究，採用案例研究方法，在國家、區域、全球三個層次，對既有文獻進行回顧，將天下主義作為一種理論途徑，結合國家戰略文化、區域主義與安全、全球治理與秩序等理論構建理論框架、引入天下主義視角，通過天下維度和權力維度，劃分出國家層次的名天下、弱天下、柔天下、強天下，區域層次的競爭型天下、務實型天下、單一型天下、共同型天下，全球層次的團結型天下、鬥爭型天下、發展型天下、解放型天下等類型，以當代中國的政治參與為案例，包括國家層次的毛澤東時代、鄧小平時代、習近平時代，區域層次的一帶一路、ASEAN-RCEP、上海合作組織，全球層次的社會主義秩序、世界革命秩序、自由世界秩序、全球南方秩序中的政治參與案例，探討了天下主義理論途徑在三個層次中的應用。研究不僅對話了西方主流國際關係學理論，還試圖構建東方文明範式與中國研究理論，以兼具理論與實踐意義，作為天下研究的又一新起點。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study addresses the question “What is Tianxiaism?” along with its existential and alternative implications. Starting from the core definition of Tianxia as an order based on rightful and acceptable relational positions (mingfen guanxi zhixu), it reviews the existing literature on Tianxia-related themes and adopts a case study method across three analytical levels: national, regional, and global. Framing Tianxiaism as a theoretical approach, the study engages with existing theories such as strategic culture, regionalism and security, and global governance and order. By introducing the Tianxia perspective and constructing a theoretical framework along the dimensions of tianxia and power, the study identifies distinct types of Tianxia: at the national level—nominal Tianxia, weak Tianxia, soft Tianxia, and strong Tianxia; at the regional level—competitive Tianxia, pragmatic Tianxia, unitary Tianxia, and communal Tianxia; and at the global level—solidarity Tianxia, struggle Tianxia, developmental Tianxia, and liberational Tianxia. Contemporary China’s political engagement serves as the empirical basis, with case studies including the Mao, Deng, and Xi eras at the national level; the Belt and Road Initiative, ASEAN-RCEP, and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization at the regional level; and China’s participation in socialist order, world revolutionary order, liberal world order, and Global South order at the global level. This study not only dialogues with mainstream Western international relations theories but also seeks to construct a theoretical paradigm rooted in Eastern civilization and Chinese thought, offering both theoretical and practical contributions and proposing a new starting point for Tianxia studies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-20T16:27:46Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-20T16:27:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員審定書 I
謝辭 III 摘要 V Abstract VI 目次 VII 表圖目次 IX 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 問題意識與研究目的 1 第二節 概念界定及文獻回顧 4 壹、天下的途徑：天下主義 6 貳、天下的存在：天下秩序 10 叁、天下的議程：天下研究 15 肆、天下的超越與探索 19 第三節 研究設計與方法 22 第四節 研究意義 28 第五節 研究佈局與章節安排 30 第二章 天下主義視角下的當代中國國家戰略文化變遷 33 第一節 引言 33 第二節 有關中國國家戰略的現有理解 34 壹、既往的戰略變遷 34 貳、未來的戰略走向 35 叁、需要天下主義進行戰略整合 37 第三節 理論構建：國家研究層次上的天下主義視角 38 壹、天下主義的引入：從古代進入當代 38 貳、戰略文化研究理論與方法：對比美國自由主義 39 叁、天下主義視角下的戰略文化理論框架 40 第四節 案例研究：天下主義視角下的中國戰略文化變遷 44 壹、名天下：毛澤東時代 44 貳、弱天下：鄧小平時代，江澤民、胡錦濤時期的延續 49 叁、強天下與柔天下：習近平時代 52 第五節 本章結論 56 第三章 天下主義視角下的當代中國區域主義政治參與 59 第一節 引言 59 第二節 有關中國區域主義的現有理解 60 壹、非正式的中國區域主義 60 貳、威脅性的中國區域主義 61 叁、吸引力的中國區域主義 62 第三節 理論建構：區域研究層次上的天下主義 64 壹、區域主義理論與大國參與 64 貳、天下主義與當代中國的引入 66 叁、天下主義視角下的區域理論 69 第四節 案例研究：天下主義視角下中國的區域主義發展 72 壹、一帶一路：單一型到共同型天下 72 貳、ASEAN-RCEP：務實型到共同型天下 78 叁、上海合作組織：競爭型到共同型天下 86 第五節 本章結論 94 第四章 天下主義視角下中國的全球秩序構建 97 第一節 引言 97 第二節 有關中國全球秩序構建的現有理解 97 壹、西方視角：權力轉移 97 貳、非西方視角：新秩序 100 叁、中國的全球秩序需要核心內涵 101 第三節 理論構建 102 壹、全球秩序研究框架 102 貳、天下主義與當代中國的引入 104 第四節 案例研究：天下主義視角下的全球秩序發展 108 壹、社會主義秩序：團結型天下 108 貳、世界革命秩序：鬥爭型天下 112 叁、自由世界秩序：發展型天下 117 肆、全球南方秩序：解放型天下 123 第五節 本章結論 129 第五章 結論 133 第一節 研究發現 133 第二節 研究限制與展望 137 參考文獻 139 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 天下主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 天下 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 權力 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國家 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 區域 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 全球 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 當代中國 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國際關係理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | region | en |
| dc.subject | power | en |
| dc.subject | international relations theory | en |
| dc.subject | contemporary China | en |
| dc.subject | globe | en |
| dc.subject | nation | en |
| dc.subject | Tianxiaism | en |
| dc.subject | tianxia | en |
| dc.title | 國際關係中的天下主義：多重層次的理論途徑與當代中國的應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Tianxiaism in International Relations: A Multilevel Theoretical Approach in Contemporary China | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 博士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 張登及 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Teng-Chi Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 石之瑜;冷則剛;左正東;甘懷真;辛翠玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chih-Yu Shih;Tse-Kang Leng;Chen-Dong Tso;Huai-Chen Kan;Chuei-Ling Shin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 天下主義,天下,權力,國家,區域,全球,當代中國,國際關係理論, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Tianxiaism,tianxia,power,nation,region,globe,contemporary China,international relations theory, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 172 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202503928 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-15 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-08-21 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf | 3.71 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。