請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9891完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 徐永豐 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ling-Ming Tseng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 曾令明 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:47:43Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-08-26 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:47:43Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2011-08-26 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2011-08-22 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Baran, B., Tekcan, A., Gurvit, H., & Boduroglu, A. (2009). Episodic memory and metamemory in Parkinson’s disease patients. Neuropsychology, 6, 736–745.
Butterfield, E. C., Nelson, T. O., & Peck, V. (1988). Developmental aspects of the feeling of knowing. Developmental Psychology, 24(5), 654-663. Carroll, M., & Simington, A. (1986). The effects of degree of learning, meaning, and Invidual differences on the feeling-of-knowing. Acta Psychologica, 61, 3-16. Cheng, C. M. (2010). Accuracy and stability of metacognitive monitoring: A new measure. Behavior Research Methods, 42(3), 715-732. Costermans, J., Loriesa, G., & Ansaya, C. (1992). Confidence level and feeling of knowing in question answering: the weight of inferential processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18(1), 142-150. Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W. (1987). Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 15, 84-93. Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifi-cations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-764. Gruneberg, M. M., Monks, J., & Sykes, R. N. (1976). Some methodological problems with feeling of knowing studies. Acta Psychologica, 41, 365-371. Hart, J. T. (1965). Memory and the feeling-of-knowing experience. Journal of Educa-tional Psychology, 56, 208-216. Hart, J. T. (1967). Memory and the memory-monitoring process. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6, 685-691. Hu, X. & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47. Janowsky, J. S., Shimamura, A. P., Kritchevsky, M., & Squire, L. R. (1989). Cognitive impairment following frontal lobe damage and its relevance to human amnesia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 103(3), 548-560. Kikyo, H., Ohki, K., & Miyashita, Y. (2002). Neural correlates for feeling-of-knowing: An fMRI parametric analysis. Neuron, 36, 177–186. Klauer, K. C. (2006). Hierarchical multinomial processing tree models: A latent-class approach. Psychometrika, 71, 7-31. Koriat, A. (2007). Metacognition and consciousness. In P. D. Zelazo, M. Moscovitch, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of consciousness, p.289-325. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press. Liu, Y., Yanjie, S., Xu, G., & Chan, R. (2007). Two dissociable aspects of feelings of knowing: Knowing that you know and knowing that you do not know. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 672-680. Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2002). Developmental trends in children’s feel-ing-of-knowing judgements. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26(4), 327–333. Luo, J., Kazuhisa, N., & Luo, Y. (2003). Neural correlates of ”feeling-of-not-knowing”: Evidence from functional MRI. Chinese Science Bulletin, 48(2), 144-147. Maril, A., Simons, J. S., Mitchell, J. P., Schwartz, B. L., & Schacter, D. L. (2003). Feeling-of-knowing in episodic memory: an event-related fMRI study. Neu-roImage, 18, 827–836. Maril, A., Simons, J. S., Weaver, J. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2005). Graded recall success: an event-related fMRI comparison of tip of the tongue and feeling of knowing. NeuroImage, 24, 1130-1138. Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Joaquim, S. G. (1993). The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(4), 851-861. Myung, I. J. (2003). Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathe-matical Psychology, 47, 90–100. Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feel-ing-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109-133. Nelson, T. O., Leonesio, R. J., Shimamura, A. P., & Landwehr, R. F. (1982). Over-learning and the feeling of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 8, 279-288. Nelson, T. O., Gerler, D., & Narens, L. (1984). Accuracy of feeling-of-knowing judg-ments for predicting perceptual identification and relearning. Journal of Exper-imental Psychology: General, 113, 282-300. Nelson, T. O., McSpadden, M., Fromme, K., & Marlatt, G. A. (1986). Effects of alco-hol intoxication on metamemory and on retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115, 247-254. Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In G. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation. New York: Academic Press. Perfect, T. J., & Hollins, T. S. (1999). Feeling-of-knowing judgments do not predict subsequent recognition performance for eyewitness memory. Journal of Exper-imental Psychology: Applied, 5(3), 250-264. Perrotin, A., Isingrini, M., Souchay, C., Clarys, D., & Taconnat, L. (2006).Episodic feeling-of-knowing accuracy and cued recall in the elderly: Evidence for double dissociation involving executive functioning and processing speed. Acta Psychologica, 122(1), 58-73. Perrotin, A., Belleville, S., & Isingrini, M. (2007). Metamemory monitoring in mild cognitive impairment: Evidence of a less accurate episodic feeling-of-knowing. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2811–2826. Prevey, M. L., Delaney, R. C., Mattson, R. H., & Tice, D. M. (1991). Feel-ing-of-knowing in temporal lobe epilepsy: monitoring knowledge inaccessible to conscious recall. Cortex, 27(1), 81-92. Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measure-ment of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339. Sacher, M., Taconnat, L., & Souchay, C. (2009). Divided attention at encoding: Effect on feeling-of-knowing. Consciousness and Cognition, 18(3), 754-761. Schmittmann, V. D., Dolan, C. V., Raijmakers, M. E. J., & Batchelder, W. H. (2010). Parameter identification in multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Re-search Methods, 42(3), 836-846 Schraw, G. (1995). Measures of feeling-of-knowing accuracy: A new look at an old problem. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 9, 321-332. Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1992). Cue familiarity but not target retrievability enhances feeling-of-knowing judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1074-1083. Schwartz, B. L., & Metcalfe, J. (1994). Methodological problems and pitfalls in the study of human metacognition. In J. Metcalfe & A. P. Shimamura (Eds.), Meta-cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT. Shimamura, A. P., & Squire, L. R. (1986). Memory and metamemory: A study of the feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 12, 452-460. Smith, J. B. & Batchelder, W. H. (2010). Beta-MPT: Multinomial processing tree models for addressing individual differences. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 54, 167–183. Souchay, C., Isingrini, M., & Gil, R. (2003). Alzheimer’s disease and feel-ing-of-knowing in episodic memory. Neuropsychologia, 1442, 1–11. Souchay, C., Bacon, E., & Danion, J. (2006a). Metamemory in schizophrenia: an ex-ploration of the feeling-of-knowing state. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 828–840. Souchay, C., Isingrini, M., & Gil, R. (2006b). Metamemory monitoring and Parkin-son’s disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28(4), 618-630. Thompson, W. B., & Mason, S. (1996). Instability of individual differences in the as-sociation between confidence judgments and memory performance. Memory & Cognition, 24, 226-234. Wright, D. B. (1996). Measuring feeling of knowing: Comment on Schraw (1995). Applied Cognitive Psychology, 10, 261-268. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9891 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 「知感」是一種監控記憶的能力，意指人類對於其無法回憶的事物仍能有一種自己是否知道的感覺，然而這種感覺究竟能夠多麼準確地反映記憶項目是否存在記憶當中，就是「知感精確度」的主要研究議題。針對最常使用的回憶¬－判斷－再認實驗派典，心理學家曾經利用統計檢定、相關係數、條件機率等做為知感精確度的測量指標，但這些指標皆不能純粹地、穩定地反映知感精確度的概念。本文從邏輯、方法學與認知歷程的角度回顧這些指標的缺陷，並提出一個新的機率參數模型，將知感精確度視為模型中的一個潛在變項加以估計。根據以過去文獻資料進行統合分析的結果顯示，參數值可以有效區辨正常人與失憶症病人，並複驗多項知感研究的結果，這是一種較為合適的分析方法。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Feeling of Knowing (FOK) judgments refer to the feelings an individual has regarding his or her knowledge for a specific subject, more specifically whether or not that knowledge exists within memory. And the study of accuracy of FOK is to evaluate how accurate the feeling reflect the actual presence or absence within memory. Corresponding to the recall-judgment-recognition paradigm, psychologists used the statistical testing, the correlation coefficients, and the conditional probabilities as the index of the accuracy of FOK. However, none of these indexes can purely and stably reflect the accuracy of FOK. I review and analysis the deficits of these indexes from logical, methodological, and cognitive processing viewpoints, and propose a new probability model. In this model, the accuracy of FOK is viewed as a parameter of a latent variable. According to the meta-analysis, this parameter can differentiate normal and amnestic patient subject, and also duplicate several past researches. It shows that the modeling technic is a more proper way for analysis the accuracy of FOK. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:47:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-100-R98227117-1.pdf: 1321185 bytes, checksum: 0698f31c0dba1f93fee61dd2e739dee0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2011 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 ………………………………………………………………………………… i
摘要 ………………………………………………………………………………… iii ABSTRACT ………………………………………………………………………… v 目次 …………………………………………………………………………………vii 表圖目次 …………………………………………………………………………… ix 1. 前言 ……………………………………………………………………………1 2. 知感精確度的研究方法與測量指標 ………………………………………… 3 2.1 RJR派典的實驗程序 …………………………………………………… 3 2.2 RJR派典的列聯表資料分析指標 ……………………………………… 5 2.3 小結與討論 …………………………………………………………… 11 3. 研究模型的建立與知感歷程的分析 ………………………………………… 15 3.1 知感與記憶提取 ……………………………………………………… 15 3.2 研究模型與參數 ……………………………………………………… 16 3.3 參數與資料的關係 …………………………………………………… 17 4 過去文獻的資料統合分析 ………………………………………………… 21 4.1 參數估計方法 ………………………………………………………… 21 4.2 模型一：知感精確度只有一個參數 ………………………………… 21 4.3 模型二：猜測機率是一個自由參數 ………………………………… 23 4.4 模型三：知感精確度在有�無記憶提取的參數不同 ……………… 25 4.5 小結與討論 …………………………………………………………… 28 5 綜合討論 …………………………………………………………………… 29 5.1 知感與意識�無意識的對分 ………………………………………… 29 5.2 知感的信心評估 ……………………………………………………… 30 5.3 知感的個別差異 ……………………………………………………… 30 參考文獻 ………………………………………………………………………… 33 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 重新解讀知感 － 一個採用機率模型的統合分析研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Recasting the Feeling of Knowing – A Meta-analysis Study Using Probability Models | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 99-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 袁之琦,吳瑞屯 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 知感,監控記憶,回憶-判斷-再認派典,多項歷程樹狀模型, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | the feeling of knowing,metamemory,the RJR paradigm,multinomial processing tree model, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 36 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2011-08-22 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-100-1.pdf | 1.29 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。