請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98832完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃長玲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chang-Ling Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳冠傑 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Guan-Jie Chen | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-08-19T16:22:22Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-08-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-08-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-08-12 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文部分
王兆慶、王舒芸，2024，〈兩種準公共化：衛福部與教育部的托育政策分化成因〉，《台灣社會學》，47：71-110。 王光旭、陳敦源，2010，〈政務領導、國會監督與官僚自主：台灣全民健保政策「否決者」之研究，1986-2004〉，《行政暨政策學報》，50：107-157。 王光旭、葉謹寧、劉宜君、陳敦源、林昭吟，2021，〈全民健康保險委員會決策參與影響因素之探析：社會網絡分析的觀點〉，《行政暨政策學報》，72：67-114。 王寬弘，2021，〈淺論我國外籍移工政策與管理〉，《中央警察大學國土安全與國境管理學報》，35：73-110。 王輝煌，2000，〈官僚制度與民主政治：以美日台的結構性比較分析為例〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，12（2）：347-386。 王輝煌，2017，〈政策創新與官僚角色：臺灣解嚴後治理失能的分析〉，《文官制度季刊》，9（3）：27-64。 王麗雲，2004，〈教育研究中的菁英訪談〉，《教育研究資訊》，12（2）：95-126。 立法院公報，2020，〈立法院第 10 屆第 2 會期社會福利及衛生環境委員會第 5 次全體委員會議紀錄〉，https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/SittingCommitteesInfo/download/communique1/final/pdf/109/71/LCIDC01_1097101_00003.pdf#page=72.00。 立法院社會福利及衛生環境委員會，2024，〈「就業服務法家庭外籍看護聘僱制 度探討」公聽會報告〉，https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/SittingAttachment/download/2024062769/PPGB60500_4500_20688_1130712_0005.pdf#page=5.22。 朱鎮明，2011，〈政策協調機制及其評估制度〉，《研考雙月刊》，35（3）：23-39。 余月娥、陶宏麟，1999，〈我國外籍勞工政策與核配政策之演進〉，《勞工研究》，134：44-67。 余健慈，2010，〈全球化浪潮下國際移民對移入社會之影響－比較德國與台灣當前移工／移民政策與其影響〉，宋興洲、陳建仁（編），《公共政策與地方治理─地方自治論文集》，頁325-343。 李韶芬，2023，〈照顧趕工：當「專業化」遇上「能力」 —以長照機構為例〉，《女學學誌：婦女與性別研究》，52：1-56。 李耀泰，2008，〈發展型國家消逝下的勞動市場邏輯：台灣案例的檢視〉，《政大勞動學報》，23：1-55。 辛炳隆、劉濬誠，2023，〈我國外籍專業人才延攬及留用法令政策評析〉，《全國律師》，27（11）：6-24。 林如昕，2009，《政黨輪替後的外勞政策，2000~2006》，臺北：臺灣大學政治學系碩士論文。 林良榮，2014，〈我國『外勞（客工）』的勞動人權與社會保障：兼論勞保條例之適用與檢討〉，《台灣國際法季刊》，11（2）：51-58。 林良榮，2020，〈論外國人勞工（移工）團結權之行使與保護──ILO規範基礎、工會組織實務與團結政策〉，《交大法學評論》，勞動法特刊：233-270。 林佳和，2014，〈從國際人權的政治哲學觀談台灣的外國移工人權〉，《台灣國際法季刊》，11（2）：7-50。 林佳和，2022，《台灣產業移工管制與保障之比較研究成果報告書》，監察院國家人權委員會委託研究報告。 林津如，2000，〈「外傭政策」與女人之戰：女性主義策略再思考〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，39：93-151。 林倖妃，2017，《花媽心內話：陳菊4000天》，臺北：天下雜誌。 林倖妃、彭昱融，2008，〈內閣資優生 王如玄、王清峰 社運女悍將 官場新交鋒〉，《天下雜誌》，408：88-92。 林國榮、詹火生、馬財專、藍科正，2014，《未來十年我國外勞政策變革方向之研究》（國家發展委員會委託研究報告，NDC – DSD – 102 – 11），台北：國家發展委員會。 邱訪義、李誌偉，2016，〈影響行政部門提案三讀通過之制度性因素－總統、官僚、與政黨〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，13（1）：39-84。 邱琡雯，1998，〈外勞族群媒體研究初探：以臺灣泰語廣播節目為例〉，《臺灣社會研究季刊》，31：169-193。 范瑟珍，2014，〈人口結構與人口依賴關係之探討〉，《台灣經濟論衡》，12（7）：93-108。 夏傳位，2000，〈勞資衝突時弱勢為上〉，《天下雜誌》，229：82-86。 孫友聯，2013，〈移動中的剝削：臺灣外勞人權問題剖析〉，《臺灣人權學刊》，2（2）：113-128。 孫健忠，2008，〈移工社會保障宣言及實施—國際經驗與我國現況的初探〉，《社區發展季刊》，123：160-169。 孫煒，2010，〈我國族群型代表性行政機關的設置及其意涵〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，7（4）：85-136。 馬財專，2007，〈結構網絡的分析及其脈絡〉，《政治科學論叢》，33：1-42。 張志偉，2018，〈專家知識作為行政決定的關鍵因素——以委員會組織之判斷餘地類型為檢視對象〉，《東吳法律學報》，31（1）：1-52。 張其祿、廖達琪，2009，《強化中央行政機關橫向協調機制之研究》，臺北：行政院研考會。 張秋蘭，2022，〈從日本開放移工運用機制探討我國移工技術人力管理之可行性作法〉，《就業安全半年刊》，21（1）：66-77。 張烽益，2012，〈本勞失業低薪下的外勞政策大鬆綁〉，《新社會政策》，24：27-29。 張烽益，2015，〈以外勞吸引台商回流的政策總體檢〉，《新社會政策》，38：36-38。 張烽益，2022，〈移工？移民？國內外國勞動力政策的改革方向〉，《勞動者雜誌》，208：22-23。 張靜年、曾育慧，2024，〈從引進印度移工爭議談社會與制度性歧視〉，《台灣公共衛生雜誌》，43（3）：219-227。 張麗伽，2006，《陳菊．台灣菊—台灣最後的情義》，臺北：印刻。 梁莉芳、蘇育萱，2018，〈外籍居家看護工－家事服務法的立法爭議〉，載於王麗容（主編），《長照需求下的外籍看護勞動權益》（37-52頁）。台北：遠東集團財團法人徐元智先生紀念基金會。 許家雋，2012，〈到底多廉價才夠？談基本工資與廉價外勞〉，《文化研究月報》，128：34-37。 許聖章，2021，〈農業人口老化與農業移工需求〉，《就業安全半年刊》，20（2）：67-79。 許聖章、陳吉仲，2015，《從農業勞動供需情勢研析及勞動力運用評估》，勞動部勞動力發展署委託研究計畫期末報告。 郭振昌，2022，〈我國就業服務法30年的變革、挑戰與前瞻〉，《臺灣勞工季刊》，72：4-13。 陳正芬，2011，〈雙軌分立的長期照顧體系：照顧服務員國籍與品質的抉擇叉路〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，85：381-386。 陳宗韓，1999，《臺灣外籍勞工政策的政治經濟分析》，臺北：國立臺灣大學三民主義研究所博士論文。 陳建文，2020，〈臺灣外籍家事勞動者的勞權規範發展觀察 ──評析家事勞工保護法草案相關版本〉，《交大法學評論》，勞動法特刊：93-124。 陳春富、殷美香，2015，〈「跨國移住者」媒體再現研究：以臺灣主流報紙之新聞報導為觀察〉，《新聞學研究》，125：49-93。 陳海雄、戴純眉，2007，「行政院跨部會政策協調機制之建置」，《研考雙月刊》，31（6）：95-106。 陳碧秋、蔡奇璋、賴鈺欣，2023，《我國防制失聯移工策略之研究》，內政部移民署自行研究報告。 傅柏翔，2020，〈外籍家庭看護工重要勞動權利保障和救濟之多重困境分析 ──一個法與社會研究視角之初步反思〉，《交大法學評論》，勞動法特刊，頁133-175。 勞動部，2024，《農業移工政策改善措施報告》，立法院第 11 屆第 1 會期經濟委員會第 17 次全體委員會議：https://ppg.ly.gov.tw/ppg/SittingAttachment/download/2024061985/24743202611026000003.pdf。 黃秀端、林政楠，2014，〈移民權利、移民管制與整合－入出國及移民法在立法院修法過程的分析〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，11（3）：83-133。 黃源銘，2010，〈論專家學者參與公共事務之法律地位－以行政法與刑法觀點為中心〉，《臺北大學法學論叢》，75：1-61。 楊雅雯，2021，〈跨越國境的勞動平權？—論勞動權利之平等保護面對「暫時性跨國移工制度」之侷限〉，《中研院法學期刊》，28：211–258。 楊雅雯，2025，〈台灣暫時性移工制度是否違反國家消除強迫勞動之人權義務？：以不自由勞動概念檢視國際及本土實踐〉，《中研院法學期刊》，36：121-213。 楊慧敏，2015，〈我國社福外勞引進及管理制度之探討〉，《國會月刊》，43（4）：65-86。 經建會部門計劃處，2012，〈推動台商回台再展經濟動能加強推動台商回台投資方案〉，《台灣經濟論衡》，10（11）：6-22。 經建會都市及住宅發展處，2011，〈推動產業升級，創造在地就業機會──第二階段「產業有家，家有產業」新竹縣、桃園縣、嘉義市與新竹市座談紀實〉，《台灣經濟論衡》，9（8）：66-74。 廖洲棚，2014，〈論跨機關管制行政之政策協調：賽局理論的觀點〉，《行政暨政策學報》，59：89-126。 監察院，2022，〈監察院調查報告111社調0004〉，https://www.cy.gov.tw/public/Data/111mo/111%AA%C0%BD%D50004.pdf。 監察院，2023a，《一群在台灣沒有身分的人：移工為什麼要失聯？》，臺北：監察院。 監察院，2023b，〈監察院調查報告111財調0044〉，https://cybsbox.cy.gov.tw/CYBSBoxSSL/edoc/download/62501。 劉侑學、呂建德，2024，〈超越爭功諉過的福利改革邏輯：蔡英文政府年金改革的政治分析〉，《台灣社會學》，47：111-147。 劉梅君，2000，〈廉價外勞論述的政治經濟學批判〉，《台灣社會研究季刊》，38：59-90。 劉梅君，2022，〈外籍移工管理法制的回顧及其生活照顧的未竟之地〉，《臺灣勞工季刊》，72：42-53。 劉黃麗娟，2022，《從國際勞工公約檢視我國社福類移工人權保護的現況與發展之研究》，監察院國家人權委員會委託研究報告。 歐錫昌，1995，〈低成本換來高代價〉，《天下雜誌》，175：40-46。 潘淑雯，2003，《我國外籍勞工政策制定過程—政策網絡的分析》，嘉義：中正大學勞工研究所碩士論文。 蔡榮祥，2017，〈半總統制下總統、總理和國會的三角關係：台灣和波蘭的運作經驗分析〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，35（2）：1-71。 鄭津津，2011，〈外籍勞工之政策及人權保障之檢視〉，《監察院第四屆人權保障工作研討會論文集》，215-258。 盧沛樺，2021，〈「移工變移民」明年上路！勞動部：再不改連國人都會失業〉，《天下雜誌》，737：90-91。 蕭全政、劉淑惠，2015，《國家發展組織體制及職能之跨國比較研究》，國家發展委員會委託研究報告。 瞿宛文，2011，〈民主化與經濟發展 台灣發展型國家的不成功轉型〉，《臺灣社會研究季刊》，84：243-288。 瞿宛文，2017，《台灣戰後經濟發展的源起：後進發展的為何與如何》，臺北：聯經出版社。 簡永達，2023，《移工築起的地下社會：跨國勞動在臺灣》，台北：春山出版。 藍佩嘉、簡永達，2022，〈越南牛頭與台灣仲介：跨國招工網絡的彈性重組〉，《台灣社會學》，43：1-50。 羅凱凌，2017，〈誰說了算？台灣全民健康保險會利害關係人政策參與之個案研究〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，14（3）：103-145。 顧玉玲，2006，〈台灣的新奴工制度－高捷泰勞抗暴事件簿〉，《律師雜誌》，321：41-56。 顧玉玲，2009，〈移工運動的主體形塑：以「家事服務法」推動過程為例〉，《臺灣社會研究季刊》，74：343-365。 貳、西文部分 Aberbach, J. D., and B. A. Rockman. 2002. “Conducting and coding elite interviews.” PS: Political Science & Politics 35 (4): 673-676. Adamson, F. B., E. A. Chung, and J. F. Hollifield. 2024. “Rethinking the Migration State: Historicising, Decolonising, and Disaggregating.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (3): 559-577. Afonso, A., and C. Devitt. 2016. “Comparative political economy and international migration.” Socio-Economic Review 14 (3): 591-613. Akbar, M. 2022. “Temporariness and the production of policy categories in Canada.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (16): 3929-3946. Allison, G. T. 1971. Essence of decision: Explaining the Cuban missile crisis. Boston: Little, Brown. Anderson, B., and M. Ruhs. 2010. “Migrant workers: who needs them? A framework for the analysis of staff shortages, immigration, and public policy.” In Who needs migrant workers? Labour shortages, immigration, and public policy, edited by M. Ruhs, and B. Anderson, 15-52. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Anderson, B., F. Poesche, and M. Ruhs. 2021. “Rethinking labour migration: Covid-19, essential work, and systemic resilience.” Comparative Migration Studies 9 (1): 1- 45. Anderson, B., U. Khadka, and M. Ruhs. 2024. “Demand for migrant workers: institutional system effects beyond national borders.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (5): 1202-1225. Arango, J. 2024. “Migration policies and politics.” In Research Handbook on the Sociology of Migration, edited by G. Sciortino, M. Cvajner, and P. J. Kivisto, 96-108. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. Arel-Bundock, V., J. Atkinson, and R. A. Potter. 2015. “The limits of foreign aid diplomacy: How bureaucratic design shapes aid distribution.” International Studies Quarterly 59 (3): 544-556. Asahina, Y., and N. Higuchi. 2020. “Guest editorial the third round of migrant incorporation in East Asia: An introduction to the special issue on friends and foes of multicultural East Asia.” Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 19 (2): 1-19. Bach, T. 2021. “Bureaucracies and Policy Ideas.” In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Available at: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-1421. Bardach, E. 1998. Getting Agencies to Work Together: The Practice and Theory of Managerial Craftsmanship. Washington. D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Barker, F. 2010. “Maximizing the migration policy buck: Uniting temporary labor, development and foreign policy goals in New Zealand.” Policy and Society 29 (4): 321-331. Bautista-Chavez, A., E. Castañeda-Pérez, S. Chan, and A. Mitra. 2024. “Hierarchy in the Politics of Migration: Revisiting Race, Ethnicity, and Power in the Migration State.” International Migration Review 58 (4): 2066-2117. Becker, H. S. 1998. Tricks of the Trade: How to Think About Your Research While You’re Doing It. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Bernstein, A. 2020. “Porous Bureaucracy: Legitimating the Administrative State in Taiwan.” Law & Social Inquiry 45 (1): 28-51. Berry, J. M. 2002. “Validity and reliability issues in elite interviewing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 35 (4): 679-682. Blom‐Hansen, J., M. Baekgaard., and S. Serritzlew. 2021. “How bureaucrats shape political decisions: The role of policy information.” Public Administration 99 (4): 658-678. Bonjour, S. 2011. “The Power and Morals of Policy Makers: Reassessing the Control Gap Debate.” International Migration Review 45 (1): 89-122. Boräng, F., S. Kalm., and J. Lindvall. 2020. “Unions and the rights of migrants in the long run.” Journal of European Social Policy 30 (5): 557-570. Boswell, C. 2007. “Theorizing Migration Policy: Is There a Third Way?” International Migration Review 41 (1): 75-100. Boswell, C. 2009. The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge: Immigration Policy and Social Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Boswell, C. 2019. “Research, ‘experts,’ and the politics of migration.” In Bridging the Gaps: Linking Research to Public Debates and Policy-Making on Migration and Integration, edited by M. Ruhs, K. Tamas, and J. Palme, 21- 33. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Brierley, S., K. Lowande., R. A. Potter., and G. Toral. 2023. “Bureaucratic Politics: Blind Spots and Opportunities in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 26 (1): 271-290. Carcelli, S. P. 2024. “Bureaucratic structure and compliance with international agreements.” American Journal of Political Science 68 (1): 177-192. Chaloff, J. 2014. “Evidence-based regulation of labour migration in OECD countries: setting quotas, selection criteria, and shortage lists.” Migration Letters 11 (1): 11-22. Chan, Y. W., and P. C. Lan. 2022. “Rethinking the migration-development nexus in the post-COVID-19 era.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 31 (3): 324-335. Chibber, V. 2002. “Bureaucratic rationality and the developmental state.” American Journal of Sociology 107 (4): 951-989. Chien, Y. C. 2018. “The struggle for recognition: The politics of migrant care worker policies in Taiwan.” Critical Sociology 44 (7-8): 1147-1161. Christensen, J. G., P. B. Mortensen, and H. H. Salomonsen. 2024. “Bureaucratic politics, risk management, and agency strategy: a study of agency management in a gale.” Journal of European Public Policy 31 (11): 3867-3890. Chu, Y. W. 2016. “The Asian developmental state: Ideas and debates.” In The AsianDevelopmental State Reexaminations and New Departures, edited by Y. W. Chu, 1-25. New York: Palgrave Macmillan US. Chung, E. A. 2020. Immigrant incorporation in East Asian democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chung, E. A. 2021. “The Developmental Migration State in East Asia.” In Understanding Global Migration, edited by J. F. Hollifield, and N. Foley, 127-151. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Chung, E. A., D. Darcie, and Y. Tian. 2024. “The Developmental Migration State.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (3): 637-656. Cockel, I. 2024. “Everywhere and Anywhere: Employing Migrant Labor for Dirty, Dangerous, and Difficult Jobs” In Migrant Workers in Taiwan and Japan: Patterns, Issues and Pattens, edited by H. H. M. Hsiao, and Y. Sato, 18- 33. Taipei: Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation. Cockel, I., B. Zani, and J. S. Parhusip. 2023. “‘There will be no law, or people to protect us’: Irregular Southeast Asian seasonal workers in Taiwan before and during the pandemic.” Journal of Agrarian Change 23(3): 634-644. Consterdine, E. 2015. “Managed migration under labour: organised public, party ideology and policy change.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (9): 1433-1452. Consterdine, E. 2020. “Parties matter but institutions live on: Labour’s legacy on Conservative immigration policy and the neoliberal consensus.” The British journal of politics and international relations 22 (2): 182-201. Cook-Martín, D. 2024. “Sojourners, not settlers: Temporary labor migration since the nineteenth century.” Annual Review of Sociology 50: 627-645. Cornelius, W. A., and M. R. Rosenblum. 2005. “Immigration and politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 8: 99-119. Cornelius, W. A., P. L. Martin, and J. F. Hollifield. 1994 ‘‘Introduction: The Ambivalent Quest for Immigration Control.’’ In Controlling Immigration: A Global Perspective, edited by W. A. Cornelius, P. L. Martin, and J. F. Hollifield, 3-41. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Dancygier, R., and Y. Margalit. 2020. “The evolution of the immigration debate: Evidence from a new dataset of party positions over the last half-century.” Comparative Political Studies 53 (5): 734-774. Dargent B. E., and G. Lotta. 2025. “Expert Knowledge in Democracies: Promises, Limits, and Conflict.” Annual Review of Political Science 28: 115-132. De Haas, H. 2012. “The Migration and Development Pendulum: A Critical View on Research and Policy.” International Migration 50 (3): 8-25. De Haas, H., K. Natter, and S. Vezzoli. 2018. “Growing restrictiveness or changing selection? The nature and evolution of migration policies.” International Migration Review 52 (2): 324-367. Ellison, B. A. 2006. “Bureaucratic politics as agency competition: A comparative perspective.” International Journal of Public Administration 29 (13): 1259-1283. Fernández-Rodríguez, N., and D. Célleri. 2024. “The Power of Bureaucracies: Shaping Migration Policy Paradigms in Colombia and Ecuador.” Migration Studies 12 (4): 1-23. Freeman, G. P. 1995. “Modes of immigration politics in liberal democratic states.” International Migration Review 29 (4): 881-902. Freeman, G. P. 2002. “Winners and Losers: Politics and the Costs and Benefits of Migration.” In Western European Immigration and Immigration Policy, edited by A. M. Messina, 77-96. Westport Connecticut: Praeger. Freeman, G. P. 2006. “National models, policy types, and the politics of immigration in liberal democracies.” West European Politics 29 (2): 227-247. Freeman, G. P., and A. K. Kessler. 2008. “Political economy and migration policy.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 34 (4): 655-678. Gailmard, S., and J. W. Patty. 2012. “Formal Models of Bureaucracy.” Annual Review of Political Science 15 (1): 353-377. George, A. L., and A. Bennett. 2005. Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press. Gilad, S., S. Alon‐Barkat, and C. M. Weiss. 2019. “Bureaucratic politics and the translation of movement agendas.” Governance 32 (2): 369-385. Glas, A. 2021. “Positionality, power, and positions of power: Reflexivity in elite interviewing.” PS: Political Science & Politics 54 (3): 438-442. Guiraudon, V. 2002 “The Marshallian Triptych Reordered: The Role of Courts and Bureaucracies in Furthering Migrants’ Social Rights.” In Immigration and Welfare: Challenging the Borders of the Welfare State, edited by M. Bommesm, and A. Geddes, 72-89. London and New York: Routledge. Hafner-Burton, E. 2021. “Elite Decision-Making and International Law: Promises and Perils of the Behavioral Revolution.” American Journal of International Law Unbound 115: 242–247. Hall, P. A., and R. C. Taylor. 1996. “Political science and the three new institutionalisms.” Political studies 44 (5): 936-957. Hampshire, J. 2013. The Politics of Immigration: Contradictions of the Liberal State. Cambridge: Polity Press. Hollifield, J. F. 2004. “The Emerging Migration State.” International Migration Review 38 (3): 885-912. Hollifield, J. F., and N. Foley. 2022. “Migration interdependence and the state.” In Understanding global migration, edited by J. F. Hollifield, and N. Foley, 3-28. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Hollifield, J. F., P. Martin, and P. Orrenius. 2014. “The dilemmas of immigration control.” In Controlling immigration: A global perspective, edited by J. F. Hollifield, P. L. Martin, and P. M. Orrenius, 3-34. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 3–34. Hwang, J. T., C. H. Wang, and C. P. Chung. 2011. “Is it Possible to Decouple Foreign Workers’ Wages from the Minimum Wage in Taiwan?” The Economic and Labour Relations Review 22 (2): 107-130. Johnson, C. 1982. MITI and the Japanese miracle: The growth of industrial policy, 1925-1975. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Jones, K., N. Piper, and M. Withers. 2024. “Analysing transnational labour mobility regimes.” Work in the Global Economy 4 (1): 1-9. Joppke, C. 2001. “The Legal-domestic Sources of Immigrant Rights. The United States, Germany, and the European Union.” Comparative Political Studies 34 (4):339-366. Joppke, C. 2007. “Transformation of citizenship: status, rights, identity.” Citizenship Studies 11 (1): 37-48. Joppke, C. 1998. “Why liberal states accept unwanted immigration.” World Politics 50 (2): 266-293. Kalicki, K. 2019. “Security fears and bureaucratic rivalry: Admitting foreign labor in Japan and Taiwan.” Comparative Politics 51(4): 603-624. Kalicki, K. 2022. “Fearful states: the migration-security nexus in Northeast Asia.” The Pacific Review 35(1): 59-89. Kim, D. 2011. “Catalysers in the promotion of migrants’ rights: Church-based NGOs in South Korea.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 37 (10): 1649-1667. Kim, M. M. 2020. “Governing at a distance or at arm's length: The divergence of labor migration policy in Taiwan and South Korea.” The Taiwanese Political Science Review 24 (2): 199-248. Kim, M. M. 2025. “When do Labour Unions Fight for Migrant Workers? The Nexus of Collective Identity and Institutional Legacies in Taiwan and South Korea.” Asian Studies Review: 1-20. Kim, N. K. 2012. “The migrant workers' movement in the democratic consolidation of Korea.” Journal of Contemporary Asia 42 (4): 676-696. Knocke, W. 2000. “Sweden: Insiders Outside the Trade Union Mainstream” In Trade Unions, Immigration, and Immigrants in Europe, 1960-1993, edited by R. Penninx, and J. Roosblad, 157-183. New York: Berghahn Books. Kremers, D. 2014. “Transnational migrant advocacy from Japan: tipping the scales in the policy-making process.” Pacific Affairs 87 (4): 715-741. Lacatus, C. 2025. “Political Instrumentalism and Epistemic Communities in Global Governance a Network Analysis of the International Organization for Migration.” Governance 38 (2): 1-13. Lacroix, T. 2022. “The transnational state and migration: Reach, flows and Policies.” Political Geography 94: 102571. Lancaster, K. 2017. “Confidentiality, anonymity and power relations in elite interviewing: conducting qualitative policy research in a politicised domain.” International Journal of Social Research Methodology 20 (1): 93-103. Lee, B. H. 2019. “Immigrants’ Integration Policies and Two Patterns of Governance in Korea and Japan.” Korean Journal of International Migration 7 (1): 57-81. Lee, D. S., and S. Park. 2020. “Ministerial Leadership and Endorsement of Bureaucrats: Experimental Evidence from Presidential Governments.” Public Administration Review 80 (3): 426-441. Lee, H. K. 2015. “An overview of international migration to South Korea.” In Social Transformation and Migration: National and Local Experiences in South Korea, Turkey, Mexico and Australia, edited by S. Castles, 81-95. Basingstoke: Palgrave. Lee, J. J. G., and J. D. Skrentny. 2015. “Korean multiculturalism in comparative perspective.” In Multiethnic Korea? Multiculturalism, Migration, and Peoplehood Diversity in Contemporary South Korea, edited by J. Lie, 301-329. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, Berkeley. Lee, J. S., and S. W. Wang. 1996. “Recruiting and managing of foreign workers in Taiwan.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 5 (2-3): 281-301. Lee, S. H. 2022. “Why the initiative of free childcare failed to be an effective policy implementation of universal childcare in South Korea.” Journal of Asian Public Policy 15 (3): 558-574. Lee, Y. H., and J. K. Kim. 2025. “The Peculiar Consensus and Racial Unconscious in Migration Scholarship on Korea.” Critical Sociology 51 (2): 353-372. Lee, Y. J. 2011. “Overview of trends and policies on international migration to East Asia: Comparing Japan, Taiwan and South Korea.” Asian and Pacific Migration Journal 20 (2): 117-131. Lenard, P. T., and C. Straehle. 2010. “Temporary labour migration: Exploitation, tool of development, or both?” Policy and Society 29 (4): 283-294. Lim, T. C. 2012. “South Korea as an ‘ordinary’ country: A comparative inquiry into the prospects for ‘permanent’ immigration to Korea.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 38 (3): 507-528. Lim, T. C., and D. H. Seol. 2018. “Explaining South Korea’s diaspora engagement policies.” Development and Society 47 (4): 633-662. Lim, T. C., D. H. Seol, and A. Sato. 2019. “Neither ‘Fish nor Fowl’: An Examination of South Korea’s Diaspora Engagement Policies.” In Diasporic Returns to the Ethnic Homeland: The Korean Diaspora in Comparative Perspective, edited by T. Tsuda, and C. Song, 35-54. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Liu, X. 2018. “Interviewing elites: Methodological issues confronting a novice.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17 (1): 1-9. Malakhov, V. S., and M. E. Simon. 2018. “Labour migration policy in Russia: Considerations on governmentality.” International Migration 56 (3): 61-72. March, J. G., and J. P. Olsen. 1984. “The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life.” American Political Science Review 78 (3): 734-749. Martin, P. 2010. “A Need for Migrant Labour? UK–US Comparisons.” In Who Needs Migrant Workers? Labour shortages, immigration, and public policy, edited by M. Ruhs, and B. Anderson, 295-323. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Mayer, M. M. 2017. “Bureaucratic Migration Politics: German Support for Common EU Policies on Labour Migration.” German Politics 26 (2): 255-272. McDonnell, E. M. 2017. “Patchwork leviathan: How pockets of bureaucratic governance flourish within institutionally diverse developing states.” American Sociological Review 82 (3): 476-510. Menz, G. 2010. The Political Economy of Managed Migration. New York: Oxford University Press. Meyers, E. 2000. “Theories of international immigration policy—A comparative analysis.” International Migration Review 34 (4): 1245-1282. Mikecz, R. 2012. “Interviewing elites: Addressing methodological issues.” Qualitative inquiry 18 (6): 482-493. Moon, C. I., and R. Prasad. 1994. “Beyond the developmental state: networks, politics, and institutions.” Governance 7 (4): 360-386. Morgan, K. J., and A. S. Orloff. 2017. “Introduction: The many hands of the state.” In The many hands of the state: Theorizing political authority and social control, edited by K. J. Morgan and A. S. Orloff, 1- 32. New York: Cambridge University Press. Natter, K. 2018. “Rethinking Immigration Policy Theory beyond ‘Western Liberal Democracies.’” Comparative Migration Studies 6 (4): 1-21. Noble, G. W. 1987. “Contending forces in Taiwan's economic policymaking: The case of Hua Tung Heavy Trucks.” Asian Survey 27 (6): 683-704. Paquet, M. 2015. “Bureaucrats as immigration policy-makers: The case of subnational immigration activism in Canada, 1990-2010.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 41 (11): 1815-1835. Paquet, M. 2020. “Immigration, bureaucracies and policy formulation: the case of Quebec.” International Migration 58 (1): 166-181. Pécoud, A. 2021. “Philosophies of Migration Governance in a Globalising World” Globalizations 18: 103-119. Pierce, R. 2008. Research Methods in Politics: A Practical Guide Sage. London: Sage. Preston, T., and P. ’t Hart. 1999. “Understanding and Evaluating Bureaucratic Politics: The Nexus Between Political Leaders and Advisory.” Political Psychology 20: 49-98. Richards, D. 1996. “Elite Interviewing: Approaches and Pitfalls” Politics 19 (3): 199-204. Rodríguez-Teruel, J., and J. P. Daloz. 2017. “Surveying and observing political elites.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Political Elites, edited by H. Best, and J. Higley, 93- 113. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. Rosenhek, Z. 2000. “Migration regimes, intra-state conflicts, and the politics of exclusion and inclusion: migrant workers in the Israeli welfare state.” Social Problems 47 (1): 49-67. Ruhs, M. 2013. The Price of Rights: Regulating International Labor Migration. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Ruhs, M. 2018. “Labor immigration policies in high-income countries: Variations across political regimes and varieties of capitalism.” The Journal of Legal Studies 47 (S1): 89-127. Ruhs, M., and B. Anderson. 2010. “Introduction.” In Who Needs Migrant Workers? Labour shortages, immigration, and public policy, edited by M. Ruhs, and B. Anderson, 1-14. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ruhs, M., and P. Martin. 2008. “Numbers vs. Rights: Trade-Offs and Guest Worker Programs.” International Migration Review 42 (1): 249-265. Schmid, D., and G. Bird. 2025. “Theorising the ‘migration fix’: workerisation and exclusion in the European border regime.” New Political Economy 30 (3): 418-430. Schultz, C., P. Lutz, and S. Simon. 2021. “Explaining the immigration policy mix: Countries' relative openness to asylum and labour migration.” European Journal of Political Research 60 (4): 763-784. Seol, D. H., and J. D. Skrentny. 2009. “Why Is There So Little Migrant Settlement in East Asia?” International Migration Review 43 (3): 578-620. Takaya, S. 2025. “Policy change and national identification: the discursive institutionalism of Japan’s migrant admission policy.” Social Science Japan Journal 28 (1): jyaf002. Tansey, O. 2007. “Process tracing and elite interviewing: a case for non-probability sampling.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (4): 765-772. Taylor, J. E. 2010. “Agricultural labor and migration policy.” Annual Review of Resource Economics 2 (1): 369-393. Tierney, R. 2007. “The guest labor system in Taiwan: Labor market considerations, wage injustices, and the politics of foreign labor brokerage.” Critical Asian Studies 39 (2): 205-228. Triadafilopoulos, T., and Z. Taylor. 2024. “The domestic politics of selective permeability: disaggregating the Canadian migration state.” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 50 (3): 702-725. Triandafyllidou, A. 2022. “Temporary migration: category of analysis or category of practice?” Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 48 (16): 3847-3859. Tseng, Y. F., and H. Z. Wang, 2013. “Governing migrant workers at a distance: Managing the temporary status of guestworkers in Taiwan.” International Migration 51 (4): 1-19. Urinboyev, R., and S. Eraliev. 2022. The Political Economy of Non-Western Migration Regimes: Central Asian Migrant Workers in Russia and Turkey. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. Vaagland, K. 2024. “How ‘going online’ mediates the challenges of policy elite interviews.” Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 11(1): 1-8. Von Soest, C. 2023. “Why do we speak to experts? Reviving the strength of the expert interview method.” Perspectives on Politics 21 (1): 277-287. Wakisaka, D. 2022. “Beyond street‐level bureaucracy: the organisational culture of migration policy‐making and administrative elites.” International Migration 60 (4): 150-163. Wakisaka, D. 2024. “Unraveling Migration Policy-Making in the Land of ‘No Immigrants’: Japanese Bureaucracy and the Discursive Gap.” International Migration Review 58 (3): 1507-1531. Whang, T., E. V. McLean, and C. Yu. 2025. “How bureaucratic competition shapes foreign aid allocation: The case of South Korea’s aid agencies.” Journal of International Development 37 (1): 129-149. Wilson, J. Q. 1986. American Government: Institutions and Policies, 3rd edition Lexington: D. C. Heath and Company. Wright, C. F. 2012. “Immigration policy and market institutions in liberal market economies.” Industrial Relations Journal 43 (2): 110-136. Yamanaka, K. 2010. “Civil society and social movements for immigrant rights in Japan and South Korea: Convergence and divergence in unskilled immigration policy.” Korea Observer 41 (4): 615-647. Yanow, D. 2000. Conducting interpretive policy analysis. London: SAGE. Yoon, I. J. 2014. “From a migrant integration of distinction to a multiculturalism of inclusion.” In Global and Asian Perspectives on International Migration, edited by G. Battistella, 101-117. Cham: Springer International Publishing. 參、韓文部分 석하림、고민희，2022，〈이민정책의 파편화와 선별적 사회통합: 한국의 외국인 근로자 정책을 중심으로.〉，《담론201》，25(2)：103- 138。 이병하，2013，〈한국과 일본의 외국인 노동자 정책과 외국인 노동자 운동 이중적 시민사회와 정치적 기회구조〉，《기억과 전망》，29：264- 304。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/98832 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討臺灣移工政策制定過程中的部會分歧，並挑戰了過往認為勞動部在政策過程中相對處於弱勢的觀點。為了解答「為何勞動部在移工政策上並不如預期弱勢？」此一核心問題，本研究採用新制度主義與官僚政治的分析視角「拆解」臺灣的發展型移民國家，不再將國家視為鐵板一塊，而是希望能夠打開政策制定過程的「黑盒子」，釐清涉及其中的各部會所偏好的政策以及部會間的權力動態。
透過文獻分析以及對17位政策參與者的半結構式訪談，本研究發現各部會在移工政策上的確存在著諸多分歧，尤其以勞動部與經建部會之間最為顯著，雙方在開放引進移工的業別和規模以及薪資等勞動保障上都有不少扞格。研究結果進一步指出，勞動部之所以能有效抵禦來自經建部會的壓力，主要歸因於兩大關鍵：首先，專業分工下積累的知識權力，使勞動部在跨部會的協調機制中能有力地主導議程與論述，並在薪資脫鉤等爭議中，成為上位決策者眼中更具說服力的一方。其次，勞動部作為移工政策的主管機關，本身即享有層級上的決策優勢，並在與其他部會有分歧甚至是衝突時，多次爭取到行政院長乃至於總統等上位者的支持。 綜合上述，本研究認為，臺灣移工政策的部會分歧不僅彰顯了臺灣移民政策邏輯的複雜性，也呼應並深化了「發展型移民國家」的核心論點。尤其不如預期般弱勢的勞動部會在政策過程中扮演了積極干預的角色，主動建構多元的論述來捍衛其偏好的政策，這種策略性、目標導向的模式，與發展型移民國家主動管理移民以達成發展目標的特徵吻合。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This article investigates a key paradox in Taiwan’s labor migration policy: how the Ministry of Labor (MOL), often perceived as a ‘weak’ ministry, has successfully resisted pressure from powerful economic-sector ministries.
To address this puzzle, we unpack the “black box” of the labor migration policymaking process. By disaggregating the developmental migration state and drawing on archival research and elite interviews with key policymakers, the qualitative analysis shows that the MOL’s influence is rooted in two core factors: specialization and hierarchy. The analysis reveals how the MOL has cultivated knowledge power via specialization to frame policy debates persuasively, while its hierarchical position—both as the competent authority and through its ability to secure support from higher-level decision-makers—grants it institutional veto power over proposals that conflict with its core mission of protecting the domestic labor market. These findings challenge the monolithic view of the developmental migration state, highlighting that the logic of migration governance is complex and pluralistic. The study concludes that policy outcomes are the product of competition between the distinct governance logics championed by different ministries. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-08-19T16:22:22Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-08-19T16:22:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
謝辭 ii 中文摘要 vi 英文摘要 vii 目 次 viii 圖 次 x 表 次 x 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧與研究問題 7 第一節、移民政策的制定邏輯 7 壹、由下而上的政策制定力量 7 貳、由上而下的政策制定力量 10 參、「拆解」國家 12 第二節、臺灣的移工政策 14 壹、移工政策的演進 15 貳、移工政策的變化與政黨差異 18 參、臺灣移工政策曾存在的部會分歧 20 第三章 理論框架與研究設計 23 第一節、分析架構 23 第二節、研究方法與資料來源 27 第三節、研究範圍 32 第四章 移工政策制定過程中的部會分歧 33 第一節、移工政策的制定過程 33 第二節、各部會在移工政策的立場 37 壹、勞動部（勞委會） 38 貳、經建部會 41 參、其他部會 56 第三節、移工政策的部會分歧 66 壹、開放業別、配額 67 貳、移工薪資與基本工資脫鉤 72 第四節、小結 76 第五章 部會分歧如何塑造政策 81 第一節、專業分工 81 壹、勞動部的專業知識 82 貳、專家學者的專業知識 85 參、專業分工下的「說服力」 87 第二節、層級 90 壹、主管機關在層級中的重要性 91 貳、行政層級的協調機制 93 參、總統在層級中的重要性 95 肆、「實力」決定層級 97 第三節、使命的轉變 99 第六章 結論 104 第一節、研究發現與討論 104 第二節、研究限制與建議 108 參考文獻 111 壹、中文部分 111 貳、西文部分 117 參、韓文部分 131 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 移工政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 發展型移民國家 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 移民政治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 官僚政治 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 部會分歧 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Developmental Migration State | en |
| dc.subject | Labor Migration Policies | en |
| dc.subject | Migration Politics | en |
| dc.subject | Bureaucratic Politics | en |
| dc.subject | Inter-Ministerial Disagreement | en |
| dc.title | 拆解發展型移民國家：部會分歧如何塑造臺灣的移工政策 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Disaggregating Developmental Migration State: How Inter-Ministerial Disagreements Shaped Taiwan’s Labor Migration Policies | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | 錢宜群 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.coadvisor | Yi-Chun Chien | en |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 藍佩嘉;曾嬿芬 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Pei-Chia Lan;Yen-Fen Tseng | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 發展型移民國家,移工政策,部會分歧,官僚政治,移民政治, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Developmental Migration State,Labor Migration Policies,Inter-Ministerial Disagreement,Bureaucratic Politics,Migration Politics, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 132 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202504060 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-08-14 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 政治學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2027-08-19 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 政治學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2027-08-19 | 2.28 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。