請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97949完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 熊欣華 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hsin-Hua Hsiung | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 張珮珊 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Pei-Shan Chang | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-23T16:12:51Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-24 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-23 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-08 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 林文政（2015年9月17日）：〈讓員工一星期有一天做自己想做的事，你敢嗎？〉。《經理人》。https://www.managertoday.com.tw/columns/view/51270?utm_source=copyshare
周君倚、陸洛（2016）：〈工作狂研究之回顧與前瞻〉。《應用心理研究》，（65），61–127。 https://doi.org/10.3966/156092512016120065003 許以萱（2021）：《雙向度威權領導的剖面模型：不同類型的效果比較》（碩士論文，國立臺灣大學），臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統。https://hdl.handle.net/11296/n8d677 盧詩磊、林裕祥（2015年9月15日）：〈洞悉市場需求，培育創新人才〉。《工業技術與資訊月刊》，（287），4–7。https://www.itri.org.tw/ListStyle.aspx?DisplayStyle=18_content&SiteID=1&MmmID=1036452026061075714&MGID=655147410571653353 Akkermans, J., & Tims, M. (2017). Crafting your career: How career competencies relate to career success via job crafting. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 66(1), 168–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12082 Alge, B. J., Ballinger, G. A., Tangirala, S., & Oakley, J. L. (2006). Information privacy in organizations: Empowering creative and extrarole performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.221 Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Three-step approaches using Mplus. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 21(3), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.915181 Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2021). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary secondary model (Mplus Web Notes No. 21, Version 11). Mplus. https://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnotes/webnote21.pdf Bakk, Z., Oberski, D. L., & Vermunt, J. K. (2014). Relating latent class assignments to external variables: Standard errors for correct inference. Political Analysis, 22(4), 520–540. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpu003 Bakk, Z., Tekle, F. B., & Vermunt, J. K. (2013). Estimating the association between latent class membership and external variables using bias-adjusted three-step approaches. Sociological Methodology, 43(1), 272–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081175012470644 Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands‐resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115 Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056 Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. I. (2014). Burnout and work engagement: The JD–R approach. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(2014), 389–411. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235 Bakker, A. B., Tims, M., & Derks, D. (2012). Proactive personality and job performance: The role of job crafting and work engagement. Human Relations, 65(10), 1359–1378. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872671245347 Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: A study in experimental and social psychology. Cambridge University Press. Bentley, F. S., & Kehoe, R. R. (2020). Give them some slack—they’re trying to change! The benefits of excess cash, excess employees, and increased human capital in the strategic change context. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2018.0272 Berson, Y., & Halevy, N. (2014). Hierarchy, leadership, and construal fit. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(3), 232–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000017 Bipp, T., & Demerouti, E. (2015). Which employees craft their jobs and how? Basic dimensions of personality and employees' job crafting behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 88(4), 631–655. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12089 Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004). Estimating Latent Structure Models with Categorical Variables: One-Step Versus Three-Step Estimators. Political Analysis, 12(1), 3–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mph001 Borman, W. C., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1997). Task performance and contextual performance: The meaning for personnel selection research. Human Performance, 10(2), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_3 Breaugh, J. A. (1985). The measurement of work autonomy. Human Relations, 38(6), 551–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872678503800604 Brenninkmeijer, V., & Hekkert-Koning, M. (2015). To craft or not to craft: The relationships between regulatory focus, job crafting and work outcomes. Career Development International, 20(2), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-12-2014-0162 Brislin, R. W. (1980). Cross-cultural research methods. In I. Altman, A. Rapoport, & J. F. Wohlwill (Eds.), Environment and culture (Vol. 4, pp. 47–82). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-0451-5_3 Brown, J. (1958). Some tests of the decay theory of immediate memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10(1), 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470215808416249 Bruning, P. F., & Campion, M. A. (2018). A role–resource approach–avoidance model of job crafting: A multimethod integration and extension of job crafting theory. Academy of Management Journal, 61(2), 499–522. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.0604 Buchtel, E. E., Ng, L. C., Norenzayan, A., Heine, S. J., Biesanz, J. C., Chen, S. X., Bond, M. H., Peng, Q., & Su, Y. (2018). A sense of obligation: Cultural differences in the experience of obligation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44(11), 1545–1566. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167218769610 Burgoon, E. M., Henderson, M. D., & Markman, A. B. (2013). There are many ways to see the forest for the trees: A tour guide for abstraction. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(5), 501–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691613497964 Charbonnier‐Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: A new scale to measure individual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l'Administration, 29(3), 280–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cjas.232 Chen, L., & Du, Y. (2023). The impact of role overload on job crafting from the perspective of construal level theory. Personnel Review, 52(8), 1957–1974. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2021-0179 Conz, E., Magnani, G., Zucchella, A., & De Massis, A. (2023). Responding to unexpected crises: The roles of slack resources and entrepreneurial attitude to build resilience. Small Business Economics, 61(3), 957–981. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-022-00718-2 Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 habits of highly effective people: Powerful lessons in personal change. Free Press. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Prentice-Hall. Demerouti, E. (2014). Design your own job through job crafting. European Psychologist, 19(4), 237–247. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000188 Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499 Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees: Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1057-7408(07)70014-1 Diallo, T. M., Morin, A. J., & Lu, H. (2017). The impact of total and partial inclusion or exclusion of active and inactive time invariant covariates in growth mixture models. Psychological Methods, 22(1), 166–190. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000084 Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13 Elliot, A. J. (2006). The hierarchical model of approach-avoidance motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 30, 111–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-006-9028-7 Elsbach, K. D., & Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Enhancing creativity through “mindless” work: A framework of workday design. Organization Science, 17(4), 470–483. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0193 Eyal, T., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). Judging near and distant virtue and vice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1204–1209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.03.012 Fisher, G. G., Bulger, C. A., & Smith, C. S. (2009). Beyond work and family: a measure of work/nonwork interference and enhancement. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016737 Fong, C. Y. M., Tims, M., & Khapova, S. N. (2022). Coworker responses to job crafting: Implications for willingness to cooperate and conflict. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 138, 103781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2022.103781 Fong, C. Y. M., Tims, M., Khapova, S. N., & Beijer, S. (2021). Supervisor reactions to avoidance job crafting: The role of political skill and approach job crafting. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70(3), 1209–1241. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12273 Förster, J., Friedman, R. S., & Liberman, N. (2004). Temporal construal effects on abstract and concrete thinking: Consequences for insight and creative cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 177–189. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.177 Fujita, K., Trope, Y., Liberman, N., & Levin-Sagi, M. (2006). Construal levels and self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.3.351 Fuller Jr, B., & Marler, L. E. (2009). Change driven by nature: A meta-analytic review of the proactive personality literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 75(3), 329–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2009.05.008 Golden, L. (2009). A brief history of long work time and the contemporary sources of overwork. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 217–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9698-z Grant, A. M., & Parker, S. K. (2009). 7 redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. The Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 317–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903047327 Hackman, J. R., & Lawler, E. E. (1971). Employee reactions to job characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 55(3), 259–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031152 Hansen, J., Alves, H., & Trope, Y. (2016). Psychological distance reduces literal imitation: Evidence from an imitation-learning paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000150 Harju, L. K., Kaltiainen, J., & Hakanen, J. J. (2021). The double‐edged sword of job crafting: The effects of job crafting on changes in job demands and employee well‐being. Human Resource Management, 60(6), 953–968. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.22054 Herzberg, F. I. (1966). Work and the nature of man. World Publishing. Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513 Hofmans, J., Wille, B., & Schreurs, B. (2020). Person-centered methods in vocational research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103398 Howard, M. C., & Hoffman, M. E. (2018). Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: Where theory meets the method. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 846–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117744021 Johnson, J. W. (2001). The relative importance of task and contextual performance dimensions to supervisor judgments of overall performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(5), 984–996. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.984 Joshi, P. D., & Wakslak, C. J. (2014). Communicating with the crowd: Speakers use abstract messages when addressing larger audiences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(1), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032413 Kalkstein, D. A., Kleiman, T., Wakslak, C. J., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2016). Social learning across psychological distance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000042 Kang, J. H., Matusik, J. G., & Barclay, L. A. (2017). Affective and normative motives to work overtime in Asian organizations: Four cultural orientations from Confucian ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 140, 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2683-4 Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2018). Can empowering leaders affect subordinates’ well-being and careers because they encourage subordinates’ job crafting behaviors? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 25(2), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051817727702 Lammers, J. (2012). Abstraction increases hypocrisy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(2), 475–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.07.006 Laurence, G. A. (2010). Workaholism and expansion and contraction oriented job crafting: The moderating effects of individual and contextual factors (Publication No. 3429621) [Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. https://www.proquest.com/docview/763183102 Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Chaiken, S. (2010). Flexibility now, consistency later: Psychological distance and construal shape evaluative responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(1), 32–51. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019843 Ledgerwood, A., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2015). Construal level theory and regulatory scope. In R. A. Scott, S. M. Kosslyn, & M. C. Buchmann (Eds.), Emerging trends in the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 1–10). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0052 Lee, J. Y., & Lee, Y. (2018). Job crafting and performance: Literature review and implications for human resource development. Human Resource Development Review, 17(3), 277–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484318788269 Levinthal, D., & Gavetti, G. (2000). Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666981 Lewis, M. (2021). The premonition: A pandemic story. Penguin UK. Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2008). The psychology of transcending the here and now. Science, 322(5905), 1201–1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161958 Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (1998). The role of feasibility and desirability considerations in near and distant future decisions: A test of temporal construal theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.5 Lichtenthaler, P. W., & Fischbach, A. (2016). Job crafting and motivation to continue working beyond retirement age. Career Development International, 21(5), 477–497. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-01-2016-0009 Lichtenthaler, P. W., & Fischbach, A. (2019). A meta-analysis on promotion-and prevention-focused job crafting. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(1), 30–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2018.1527767 Lin, S. H. J., & Johnson, R. E. (2015). A suggestion to improve a day keeps your depletion away: Examining promotive and prohibitive voice behaviors within a regulatory focus and ego depletion framework. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(5), 1381–1397. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000018 Lopper, E., Horstmann, K. T., & Hoppe, A. (2024). The approach‐avoidance job crafting scale: Development and validation of a measurement of the hierarchical structure of job crafting. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 73(1), 93–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12466 MacGregor, K. E., Carnevale, J. J., Dusthimer, N. E., & Fujita, K. (2017). Knowledge of the self-control benefits of high-level versus low-level construal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(4), 607–620. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000130 Mäkikangas, A. (2018). Job crafting profiles and work engagement: A person-centered approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 106, 101–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.01.001 Mäkikangas, A., & Schaufeli, W. (2021). A person-centered investigation of two dominant job crafting theoretical frameworks and their work-related implications. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 131, 103658. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2021.103658 Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Morin, A. J. (2009). Classical latent profile analysis of academic self-concept dimensions: Synergy of person-and variable-centered approaches to theoretical models of self-concept. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(2), 191–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510902751010 Medin, D. L., & Smith, E. E. (1984). Concepts and concept formation. Annual Review of Psychology, 35(1), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.000553 Merz, E. L., & Roesch, S. C. (2011). A latent profile analysis of the five factor model of personality: Modeling trait interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(8), 915–919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.07.022 Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E. (2006). The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321 Morin, A. J. S., Bujacz, A., & Gagné, M. (2018). Person-Centered Methodologies in the Organizational Sciences: Introduction to the Feature Topic. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428118773856 Morin, A. J., & Litalien, D. (2019). Mixture modeling for lifespan developmental research. In O. Braddick (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of psychology. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.364 Morin, A. J., McLarnon, M. J., & Litalien, D. (2020). Mixture modeling for organizational behavior research. In Y. Griep, S. D. Hansen, T. Vantilborgh, & J. Hofmans (Eds.), Handbook on the temporal dynamics of organizational behavior (pp. 351–379). Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788974387.00031 Morin, A. J., Meyer, J. P., Creusier, J., & Biétry, F. (2016). Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods, 19(2), 231–254. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442811562114 Murphy, P. R., & Jackson, S. E. (1999). Managing work-role performance: Challenges for twenty-first-century organizations and their employees. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 325–365). Jossey Bass. Neal, A. F., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Technology and performance. In D. R. Ilgen & E. D. Pulakos (Eds.), The changing nature of performance: Implications for staffing, motivation, and development (pp. 21–55). Jossey-Bass. Nichols, D. S. (2006). The trials of separating bath water from baby: A review and critique of the mmpi–2 restructured clinical scales. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87(2), 121–138. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa8702_02 Nielsen, K., & Abildgaard, J. S. (2012). The development and validation of a job crafting measure for use with blue-collar workers. Work & Stress, 26(4), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.733543 Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A monte carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701575396 Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657 Oldham, G. R., & Fried, Y. (2016). Job design research and theory: Past, present and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136, 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.002 Packer, D. J., Fujita, K., & Herman, S. (2013). Rebels with a cause: A goal conflict approach to understanding when conscientious people dissent. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49(5), 927–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.05.001 Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., Peeters, M. C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Hetland, J. (2012). Crafting a job on a daily basis: Contextual correlates and the link to work engagement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(8), 1120–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1783 Petrou, P., Demerouti, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2015). Job crafting in changing organizations: Antecedents and implications for exhaustion and performance. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20(4), 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039003 Petrou, P., & Xanthopoulou, D. (2021). Interactive effects of approach and avoidance job crafting in explaining weekly variations in work performance and employability. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 70(3), 1345–1359. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12277 Pierce, J. L., & Dunham, R. B. (1978). The measurement of perceived job characteristics: The job diagnostic survey versus the job characteristics inventory. Academy of Management Journal, 21(1), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.2307/255668 Polman, E., & Emich, K. J. (2011). Decisions for others are more creative than decisions for the self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 492–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211398362 Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612–624. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.612 Rastogi, M., & Chaudhary, R. (2018). Job crafting and work-family enrichment: The role of positive intrinsic work engagement. Personnel Review, 47(3), 651–674. https://doi.org/10.1108/Pr-03-2017-0065 Reyt, J. N., & Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2015). Seeing the forest for the trees: Exploratory learning, mobile technology, and knowledge workers’ role integration behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 739–762. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0991 Reyt, J.-N., Wiesenfeld, B. M., & Trope, Y. (2016). Big picture is better: The social implications of construal level for advice taking. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 135, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.05.004 Rim, S., Hansen, J., & Trope, Y. (2013). What happens why? Psychological distance and focusing on causes versus consequences of events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(3), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031024 Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192 Rosch, E., Simpson, C., & Miller, R. S. (1976). Structural bases of typicality effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(4), 491–502. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.4.491 Rudolph, C. W., Katz, I. M., Lavigne, K. N., & Zacher, H. (2017). Job crafting: A meta-analysis of relationships with individual differences, job characteristics, and work outcomes. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 102, 112–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.05.008 Sagristano, M. D., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2002). Time-dependent gambling: Odds now, money later. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131(3), 364–376. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-3445.131.3.364 Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316440528247 Semin, G. R., & Fiedler, K. (1991). The linguistic category model, its bases, applications and range. European Review of Social Psychology, 2(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779143000006 Slemp, G. R., & Vella-Brodrick, D. A., (2013).The job crafting questionnaire: A new scale to measure the extent to which employees engage in job crafting. International Journal of Wellbeing, 3(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v3i2.1 Spurk, D., Hirschi, A., Wang, M., Valero, D., & Kauffeld, S. (2020). Latent profile analysis: A review and “how to” guide of its application within vocational behavior research. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 120, 103445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103445 Steinbach, A. L., Gamache, D. L., & Johnson, R. E. (2019). Don’t get it misconstrued: Executive construal-level shifts and flexibility in the upper echelons. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 871–895. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2017.0273 Stephan, E., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2010). Politeness and psychological distance: A construal level perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(2), 268–280. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016960 Taylor, F. W. (1911). The principles of scientific management. NuVision Publications, LLC. Tenbrunsel, A. E., Diekmann, K. A., Wade-Benzoni, K. A., & Bazerman, M. H. (2010). The ethical mirage: A temporal explanation as to why we are not as ethical as we think we are. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 153–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.004 Tims, M., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Job crafting: Towards a new model of individual job redesign. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 36(2), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v36i2.841 Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2012). Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.05.009 Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2013). The impact of job crafting on job demands, job resources, and well-being. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 18(2), 230–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032141 Tims, M., Bakker, A. B, & Derks, D. (2014). Daily job crafting and the self-efficacy–performance relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(5), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-05-2012-0148 Tims, M., Bakker, A. B., & Derks, D. (2015). Job crafting and job performance: A longitudinal study. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(6), 914–928. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2014.969245 Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295x.110.3.403 Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018963 Tsai, M.-C., Nitta, M., Kim, S.-W., & Wang, W. (2016). Working overtime in east asia: Convergence or divergence? Journal of Contemporary Asia, 46(4), 700–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2016.1144778 Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1987). What do people think they're doing? Action identification and human behavior. Psychological Review, 94(1), 3–15. Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (1989). Levels of personal agency: Individual variation in action identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(4), 660–671. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.4.660 Van Scotter, J., Motowidlo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526–535. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.526 Venus, M., Johnson, R. E., Zhang, S., Wang, X.-H., & Lanaj, K. (2019). Seeing the Big Picture: A Within-Person Examination of Leader Construal Level and Vision Communication. Journal of Management, 45(7), 2666–2684. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318761576 Vermunt, J. K. (2010). Latent class modeling with covariates: Two improved three-step approaches. Political Analysis, 18(4), 450–469. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpq025 Wang, M., & Hanges, P. J. (2011). Latent class procedures: Applications to organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 14(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110383988 Wiesenfeld, B. M., Reyt, J.-N., Brockner, J., & Trope, Y. (2017). Construal level theory in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4(1), 367–400. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113115 Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305 Wilson, J., Crisp, C. B., & Mortensen, M. (2013). Extending construal-level theory to distributed groups: Understanding the effects of virtuality. Organization Science, 24(2), 629–644. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0750 Wong, K., Chan, A. H., & Ngan, S. (2019). The effect of long working hours and overtime on occupational health: A meta-analysis of evidence from 1998 to 2018. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), 2102. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16122102 Woo, S. E., Hofmans, J., Wille, B., & Tay, L. (2024). Person-centered modeling: Techniques for studying associations between people rather than variables. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 11(1), 453–480. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646 Woo, S. E., Jebb, A. T., Tay, L., & Parrigon, S. (2018). Putting the “person” in the center: Review and synthesis of person-centered approaches and methods in organizational science. Organizational Research Methods, 21(4), 814–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428117752467 Wrzesniewski, A., & Dutton, J. E. (2001). Crafting a job: Revisioning employees as active crafters of their work. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 179–201. https://doi.org/10.2307/259118 Wrzesniewski, A., LoBuglio, N., Dutton, J. E., & Berg, J. M. (2013). Job crafting and cultivating positive meaning and identity in work. In A. B. Bakker (Ed.), Advances in positive organizational psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 281–302). Emerald Group Publishing. Zhang, F., & Parker, S. K. (2019). Reorienting job crafting research: A hierarchical structure of job crafting concepts and integrative review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(2), 126–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2332 Zhang, F., & Parker, S. K. (2022). Reducing demands or optimizing demands? Effects of cognitive appraisal and autonomy on job crafting to change one’s work demands. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(5), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2022.2032665 Zhang, F., Tims, M., & Parker, S. K. (2025). Combinations of approach and avoidance crafting matter: Linking job crafting profiles with proactive personality, autonomy, work engagement, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 46(3), 385–400. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2836 Zito, M., Colombo, L., Borgogni, L., Callea, A., Cenciotti, R., Ingusci, E., & Cortese, C. G. (2019). The nature of job crafting: Positive and negative relations with job satisfaction and work-family conflict. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(7), 1176. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16071176 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97949 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 工作雕琢為員工主動客製化自身工作的概念，其顛覆傳統工作設計理論，因而受到學術界大量關注。近年來，工作雕琢進一步被區分為趨近型雕琢與迴避型雕琢。過去研究多採用變數中心取向方法單獨探討兩類行為，並各自產生正向與負向之評價，文獻普遍不鼓勵員工採取迴避型雕琢。惟從理論而言，迴避型雕琢作為員工改善工作的主動行為之一，應有助於減緩過量要求並更有效地分配資源，現有研究對迴避型雕琢是否具有正向作用的看法，仍存在理論與實證上的落差。個人中心取向方法提供解決前述矛盾的獨特優勢，從類型學的視角重新詮釋工作雕琢行為。過往研究採納潛在剖面分析（LPA）指出員工會同時運用趨近型雕琢與迴避型雕琢，且會帶來正面效果。然而，目前組型研究鮮少探討影響不同類型的前因，以及更具實務意涵的績效後果。此外，尚不清楚員工若併用高度的趨近型雕琢與迴避型雕琢是否同樣會產生正面影響。本研究基於解釋水平理論，從認知角度切入，主張員工同時採取高度的趨近型與迴避型雕琢會形成「最佳化工作雕琢組型」，且此種全面性的雕琢組合與員工的宏觀思維與績效表現相關。本研究透過潛在剖面分析方法，分別以505筆與568筆資料確認工作雕琢組型數量與樣態，並釐清其前因與後果。本研究發現組織中存在四類穩定的工作雕琢組型，分別為消極反應型（低趨近—中迴避）、均衡調整型（中趨近—中迴避）、拼搏實幹型（高趨近—低迴避）與周全靈巧型（高趨近—高迴避）。再者，高解釋水平會提升員工屬於「拼搏實幹型」與「周全靈巧型」的機率，且「周全靈巧型」具有最佳的綜合績效表現。在理論貢獻上，本研究區辨出「拼搏實幹型」與「周全靈巧型」在創造力與適應性上之關鍵差異，透過解釋水平與工作績效的討論填補了過往組型研究缺口，並拓展其應用性。在實務上，本研究建議組織可提供更高的自主性與豐富的認知訓練課程，以強化員工對任務的抽象化思考，並使其能靈活調整自身工作。最後，本研究提出工作雕琢組型的研究限制與未來研究方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Job crafting refers to employees’ proactive efforts to customize and reshape their job roles, which challenges the traditional top-down approach to job design and has thus garnered significant scholarly interest. In recent years, job crafting has been further differentiated into two distinct forms: approach crafting and avoidance crafting. Most prior studies adopted a variable-centered approach, examining these behaviors separately. Approach crafting was typically viewed positively, while avoidance crafting was often seen in a less favorable light. However, from a theoretical standpoint, avoidance crafting—also a proactive behavior aimed at improving one’s work—could help alleviate excessive demands and optimize resource allocation. There remains a gap between theoretical rationale and empirical findings regarding the potential benefits of avoidance crafting. A person-centered approach offers unique advantages in resolving these inconsistencies by capturing holistic patterns of crafting behaviors. Existing Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) studies suggest that employees engage in both approach and avoidance crafting simultaneously, which can lead to favorable outcomes. Nevertheless, limited research has explored the antecedents and performance-related consequences of different job crafting profiles, particularly whether high engagement in both forms of crafting yields optimal results. Drawing on Construal-Level Theory, this study adopts a cognitive perspective and proposes that employees who simultaneously engage in high levels of both approach and avoidance crafting form an “optimal job crafting profile.” This comprehensive pattern is hypothesized to be associated with abstract thinking (high construal level) and enhanced job performance. We conducted LPA on two samples (N = 505 and N = 568) to identify four distinct and stable job crafting profiles: (1) Passive Crafters (low approach—moderate avoidance), (2) Balanced Crafters (moderate approach—moderate avoidance), (3) Striving Crafters (high approach—low avoidance), and (4) Comprehensive Crafters (high approach—high avoidance). Results indicate that employees with higher construal levels are more likely to be classified as “Striving Crafters” or “Comprehensive Crafters”, with the latter demonstrating superior performance outcomes. Theoretically, this study distinguishes between these two high-approach crafting profiles in terms of their creative and adaptive performance. It addresses gaps in the literature and expands the application of Construal-Level Theory to job crafting research. Practically, this study suggests that organizations enhance employee autonomy and offer cognitive training programs to foster abstract thinking, which in turn enables more flexible job crafting. Finally, the study discusses the limitations and future research directions on job crafting profiles. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-23T16:12:51Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-23T16:12:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目次 v 圖次 vi 表次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 工作雕琢 5 第二節 解釋水平理論 11 第三章 研究一：解釋水平與工作雕琢組型 17 第一節 理論架構與假設推論 17 第二節 研究方法 20 第三節 研究結果 26 第四章 研究二：工作雕琢組型的效果比較 43 第一節 理論架構與假設推論 43 第二節 研究方法 49 第三節 研究結果 54 第五章 綜合討論 67 第一節 理論意涵 67 第二節 實務意涵 71 第三節 研究限制與未來方向 72 第四節 總結 75 參考文獻 76 附錄 91 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 趨近型雕琢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 工作績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 潛在剖面分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 迴避型雕琢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 趨近型雕琢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 解釋水平理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 工作績效 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 潛在剖面分析 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 迴避型雕琢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 解釋水平理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | job performance | en |
| dc.subject | construal-level theory | en |
| dc.subject | approach crafting | en |
| dc.subject | avoidance crafting | en |
| dc.subject | latent profile analysis | en |
| dc.subject | job performance | en |
| dc.subject | construal-level theory | en |
| dc.subject | approach crafting | en |
| dc.subject | avoidance crafting | en |
| dc.subject | latent profile analysis | en |
| dc.title | 以解釋水平觀點探討最佳化工作雕琢組型 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Unveiling the Optimal Job Crafting Profile from a Construal-Level Perspective | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張曼玲;簡忠仁 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Man-Ling Chang;Chung-Jen Chien | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 解釋水平理論,趨近型雕琢,迴避型雕琢,潛在剖面分析,工作績效, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | construal-level theory,approach crafting,avoidance crafting,latent profile analysis,job performance, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 102 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501610 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-10 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2030-07-07 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.89 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。