請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97904完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林敬軒 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ching-Hsuan Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林宛萱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Wan-Syuan Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-07-22T16:08:49Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-07-23 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-07-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-07-15 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 中文文獻
CRC資訊網（2018年4月18日）。兒童權利公約首次國家報告國際審查會議結論性意見（定稿）。取自https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/(X(1)S(rmdlsbcqlvxfrjtedhzfa0yn))/Document/Detail?documentId=26ED12B1-16AB-4BE0-96E1-7E99CC72282F CRC資訊網（2018年10月17日）。兒童權利公約首次國家報告國際審查結論性意見-跨部會點次審查會議紀錄。取自https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Document/Detail?documentId=0F22549B-74B0-4900-BEDE-7B23492587BF CRC資訊網（2022年11月18日）。兒童權利公約第二次國家報告國際審查結論性意見。取自https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Document/Detail?documentId=2BF473B4-5CAF-48DA-BB15-CC5F42124690 王思淳（2020）。安置機構實踐兒少表意權之初探〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立台北大學社會工作研究所。 王思淳、胡中宜（2022）。兒少表意權在安置機構的實踐與挑戰。臺大社會工作學刊，46，33-82。 白倩如（2012）。維權或充權—少年權益保障的實際途徑。社區發展季刊，139，216-224。 余姍瑾（2011）。安置機構「家」的意義建構：歷經長期機構安置之離院個案的經驗詮釋〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學社會工作學研究所。 吳淑萍（2010）。學生申訴在我國校園的發展與實踐：以成功大學學生申訴制度為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立成功大學科技法律研究所。 李品蓉（2016）。兒少安置機構社工員對「難置兒」之處遇經驗探討〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學社會工作學研究所。 李淑沛、王筱汶、黃韻蓉、陳怡芳、胡中宜（2018）。兒童權利公約之在地實踐：提升安置機構少女表意權。社區發展季刊，162，35-49。 李維倫（2017）。受傷的時間性：受性侵害及家庭關係斷損少女之生活經驗的存在現象學分析。中華心理學刊，59(3)，145-161。 林玉潔（2005）。影響少年安置滿意度之相關因素研究－以機構安置為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立台灣大學社會工作研究所。 林沛君（2017）。兒少「表意權」實質意涵的初探－以被安置兒少發聲的權利為中心。台灣人權學刊，4(1)，73-96。 林沛君（2017）。兒少被傾聽的權利在台灣的實踐與未來展望－兒童權利公約首次國家報告審查的觀察。新世紀智庫論壇，80，63-71。 林沛君（2022）。「有意義」的兒少參與：以我國地方兒少代表制度為例。臺大社會工作學刊，45，1-44。 苗元紅（2021）。兒少表意權的實踐：臺灣中央兒少代表觀點初探〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學社會工作研究所。 胡中宜（2017）。聯合國《兒童權利公約》對我國家外安置照顧之意涵：歐洲國家的經驗。社區發展季刊，157，113-124。 胡中宜（2020）。被隱沒的聲音：離開家外安置照顧青年之自立生活經驗。臺大社會工作學刊，42，95-144。 胡中宜、彭淑華（2013）。離開安置機構青年之自立生活現況與相關經驗初探。臺灣社會工作學刊，11，49-80。 胡中宜、吳宇仟、柳佳妏、李柏學（2021）。兒少被傾聽的權利在團體家庭之實踐與反思。臺灣人權學刊，6(1)，29-55。 翁毓秀（2011）。台灣地區兒童鬧年安置照顧的發展與未來。社區發展季刊，133，293-308。 翁毓秀、陳秀蕙（2019）。台灣地區的兒童參與權—以shier的兒童參與途徑分析。社區發展季刊，168，286-299。 馬若慈（2014）。論兒童陳述意見之權利：以兒童權利公約為核心〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣大學法律研究所。 高淑清（2008）。質性研究的18堂課—首航初探之旅。麗文。 張弘潔、吳柏萱、廖書荷（2022）。兒少「表意參與權」之分析：台灣少代在兒促會提案之觀點。台灣人權學刊，6(4)，67-96。 莊文芳（2012）。權益保障的建構與實踐：安置少年與工作人員之觀點〔未出版之碩士論文〕。東海大學社會工作研究所。 陳心怡、唐宜楨（2017）。從一場在職教育訓練反思《聯合國兒童權利公約》。台灣人權學刊，4(2)，73-99。 陳心怡、唐宜楨（2017）。從兒童權利觀點論家庭關係的新轉變-以兒童參與表意權為例。家庭教育雙月刊，65，31-42。 陳怡芳、胡中宜、邱郁茹、李淑沛（2013）。安置機構少女自力生活能力培育方案之反思與回饋：輔導人員之觀點。朝陽人文社會學刊，11(1)，29-68。 陳旺德（2017年12月15日）。我在育幼院的13年：體驗多年貧窮、恥感和標籤之後。報導者。https://www.twreporter.org/a/opinion-childrens-home-years 陳旺德（2022）。安置機構工作人員實踐兒少最佳利益之初探—以安置照顧為例〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立政治大學社會工作研究所。 陳旺德、陳伯偉、林昱瑄（2020）。培力還是侷限？：兒少安置機構、慣習形塑與階級效應。臺大社會工作學刊，42，1-55。 陳玟樺、劉美慧（2018）。從聯合國《兒童權利公約》反思我國學生參與課綱審查之重要課題。當代教育研究季刊，26(4)，1-45。 陳品秀（2021年9月9-10日）。《兒童權利公約》概念vs兒少安置的日常－兒少安置機構的家庭會議〔工作坊演講〕。社會局110年「《兒童權利公約》浪潮下兒少安置工作者的思與變」，臺南市，臺灣。 陳姿妦（2017）。從兒童權利保護的視角─傾聽安置兒童的心聲〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立暨南國際大學社會政策與社會工作研究所。 陳毓文（2008）。國內接受機構安置少年憂鬱情緒之探究：問題陳顯與解釋因素。中華心理衛生學刊，21(1)，75-101。 彭淑華（2006）。保護為名，權控為實？少年安機構工作人員的觀點分析。東吳社會工作學報，15，1-36。 彭淑華（2014）。新北市兒童少年家外安置服務模式及生活狀況之研究。新北市社會局委託研究報告。 鈕文英（2016）。質性研究方法與論文寫作。雙葉書廊。 黃怡菁（2019年11月12日）。3成4兒少認為「說了大人也不會聽」 兒盟籲重視兒少表意權。親子天下。https://www.parenting.com.tw/article/5080535 黃冠瑄（2021）。國中學生事務人員保障校園中兒少表意權之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立台灣師範大學教育學院公民教育與活動領導學系研究所。 黃慈忻、何素秋（2018）。機構安置少年參與兒童權利公約首次國家報告國際審查之經驗。社區發展季刊，162，50-61。 黃靜盈（2020年12月17日）。我的兒少代表經驗：以學習之名要求青少年表現專業，只是你們成人的傲慢。多多益善。https://rightplus.org/2020/12/17/crc/ 楊佩榮（2018）。高中學校經驗與青少年公民態度的關聯性。公民教育與活動領導學報，25，1-41。 蔡宗成（2018）。台北市私立心棧家園審議制度轉型之研究〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立臺灣師範大學社會工作學研究所。 衛生福利部社會及家庭署（2021）。兒童及少年委託安置實務手冊。https://www.sfaa.gov.tw/SFAA/Pages/List.aspx?nodeid=1362 衛生福利部社會及家庭署（2021）。保障兒少表意權之策略與注意事項。https://crc.sfaa.gov.tw/Uploadfile/Material/40_20210616145131_5879609.pdf 衛生福利部保護服務司（2016）。兒少保護保護安置人數及處所（資料來源：本部統計處）。https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/dops/lp-1303-105-xCat-cat04.html 英文文獻 Alfandari, R. (2017). Systemic barriers to effective utilization of decision-making tools in child protection practice. Child Abuse & Neglect, 67, 207-215.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.02.030 Archard, D., & Skivenes, M. (2009). Hearing the child. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 391-399. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2008.00606.x Bell, M. (2002). Promoting children's rights through the use of relationship. Child & Family Social Work, 7(1), 1-11.https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.2002.00225.x Berrick, J. D., Dickens, J., Pösö, T., & Skivenes, M. (2015). Children's involvement in care order decision-making: A cross-country analysis. Child Abuse & Neglect, 49, 128-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.07.001 Bessell, C. (2015). Inclusive and respectful relationships as the basis for child inclusive policies and practices: The experiences of children in out-of-home care in Australia. In T. Gal, & B. F. Duramy (Eds.), International perspectives and empirical findings on child participation: From social exclusion to child-inclusive policies, pp. 183-206. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199366989.003.0009 Biggeri, M., Arciprete, C., & Karkara, R. (2019). Children and youth participation in decision-making and research processes. The Capability Approach, Empowerment and Participation, 193-221. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-35230-9_8 van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G. (2015). Children's participation within child protection. Child & Family Social Work, 20, 129–138.https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082 Bouma, H., López López, M., Knorth, E. J., & Grietens, H. (2018). Meaningful participation for children in the Dutch child protection system: A critical analysis of relevant provisions in policy documents. Child Abuse & Neglect, 79, 279-292.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.02.016 Bruning, M. R., & Doek, J. E. (2021). Characteristics of an effective child protection system in the European and international contexts. International journal on child maltreatment: research, policy and practice, 4(3), 231-256.https://doi.org/10.1007/s42448-021-00079-5 Bruskas, D. (2008). Children in foster care: A vulnerable population at risk. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 21(2), 70-77.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6171.2008.00134.x Byrne, T., Culhane, D. P., Kim, M., Moreno, M., Stephen, M., Stevens, M., & Toros, H. (2014). Public assistance receipt among older youth exiting foster care. Children and Youth Services Review, 44, 307-316.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.06.023 Cashmore, J. (2011). Children's participation in family law decision-making: Theoretical approaches to understanding children's views. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 515-520.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.05.008 Cavet, J., & Sloper, P. (2004). The participation of children and young people in decisions about UK service development. Child: care, health and development, 30(6), 613-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2214.2004.00470.x Cele, S., & van Der Burgt, D. (2015). Participation, consultation, confusion: professionals' understandings of children's participation in physical planning. Children's Geographies, 13(1), 14-29.https://doi.org/10.1080/14733285.2013.827873 Coldrey, B. (2006). ‘The extreme end of a spectrum of violence’: physical abuse, hegemony and resistance in british residential care. Children & society, 15(2), 95-106.https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.609 Collins, M. E. (2004). Enhancing services to youths leaving foster care: Analysis of recent legislation and its potential impact. Children and Youth Services Review, 26(11), 1051-1065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2004.08.005 Collins, T. M. (2016). A child’s right to participate: Implications for international child protection. The International Journal of Human Rights, 21(1), 14-46.https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1248122 Commissioner for Children and Young People Tasmania. (2015). Involving children in decision making. Crowe, K. M. (2007). Using youth expertise at all levels: The essential resource for effective child welfare practice. New Directions for Youth Development, 2007(113), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.206 Diaz, C., Pert, H., & Thomas, N. (2018). Just another person in the room：Young people's views on their participation in Child in Care Reviews. Adoption & Fostering, 42(4), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308575918801663 Dillon, J., Greenop, D., & Hills, M. (2016). Participation in child protection: A small-scale qualitative study. Qualitative Social Work, 15(1), 70-85. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325015578946 Falch‐Eriksen, A., Toros, K., Sindi, I., & Lehtme, R. (2021). Children expressing their views in child protection casework: Current research and their rights going forward. Child & Family Social Work, 26(3), 485-497.https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12831 Forenza, B. (2016). Psychological empowerment and the pursuit of social change: Outcomes of foster youth engagement. Journal of Public Child Welfare, 10(3), 274-290.https://doi.org/10.1080/15548732.2016.1140698 Forenza, B., & Happonen, R. G. (2016). A critical analysis of foster youth advisory boards in the United States. Child & Youth Care Forum ,45, 107-121. Freundlich, M., Avery, R. J., & Padgett, D. (2007). Preparation of youth in congregate care for independent living. Child & family social work, 12(1), 64-72.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00444.x Gallagher, M., Smith, M., Hardy, M., & Wilkinson, H. (2012). Children and families' involvement in social work decision making. Children & Society, 26(1), 74-85.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00409.x Geenen, S., & Powers, L. E. (2007). “Tomorrow is another problem”: The experiences of youth in foster care during their transition into adulthood. Children and Youth Services Review, 29(8), 1085-1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2007.04.008 Gordon, H. R., & Taft, J. K. (2011). Rethinking youth political socialization: Teenage activists talk back. Youth & society, 43(4), 1499-1527.https://doi.org/10.1177/0044118X10386087 Hart, R. (2013). Children’s participation: The theory and practice of involving young citizens in community development and environmental care. Routledge. Hart, R. A. (2008). Stepping back from “The ladder”: Reflections on a model of participatory work with children. In A. Reid, B. B. Jensen, J. Nikel, & V. Simovska (Eds.), Participation and learning: Perspectives on education and the environment, health and sustainability (pp. 19–31). Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6416-6_2 Havlicek, J., Curry, A., & Villalpando, F. (2018). Youth participation in foster youth advisory boards: Perspectives of facilitators. Children and Youth Services Review, 84, 255-270.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2017.12.016 Havlicek, J., Lin, C. H., & Villalpando, F. (2016). Web survey of foster youth advisory boards in the United States. Children and Youth Services Review, 60, 109-118.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.11.023 Healy, K., & Darlington, Y. (2009). Service user participation in diverse child protection contexts: Principles for practice. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 420-430. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00613.x Herbots, K., & Put, J. (2015). The participation disc. International Journal of Children's Rights, 23(1), 154-188. DOI:10.1163/15718182-02301007 Holland, S. (2001). Representing children in child protection assessments. Childhood, 8(3), 322-339. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568201008003002 Horwath, J., Kalyva, E., & Spyru, S. (2012). “I want my experiences to make a difference” promoting participation in policy-making and service development by young people who have experienced violence. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(1), 155-162.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.09.012 Hyde, J., & Kammerer, N. (2009). Adolescents' perspectives on placement moves and congregate settings: Complex and cumulative instabilities in out-of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 31(2), 265-273.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2008.07.019 Jennings, L. B., Parra-Medina, D. M., Hilfinger-Messias, D. K., & McLoughlin, K. (2006). Toward a critical social theory of youth empowerment. Journal of Community Practice, 14(1-2), 31-55.https://doi.org/10.1300/J125v14n01_03 Judy, C. (2002). Promoting the participation of children and young people in care. Child Abuse & Neglect, 26(8), 837-847.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(02)00353-8 Krappmann, L. (2010). The weight of the child's view: Article 12 of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. International Journal of Children's Rights, 18(4), 501-513.https://doi.org/10.1163/157181810X528021 Lansdown G (2005). The evolving capacities of the child. United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). Lansdown, G. (2001). Promoting Children's Participation in Democratic Decision-Making.UNICEF International Child Development Centre. Lansdown, G. (2011). Every child’s right to be heard. A resource guide on the UN committee on the rights of the child general comment No.12. Save the Children UK. Lansdown, G. (2014). 25 years of UNCRC: Lessons learned in children's participation. Canadian Journal of Children's Rights/Revue canadienne des droits des enfants, 1(1).https://doi.org/10.22215/cjcr.v1i1.12 Larson, R., Walker, K., & Pearce, N. (2005). A comparison of youth‐driven and adult‐driven youth programs: balancing inputs from youth and adults. Journal of community psychology, 33(1), 57-74.https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20035 Leeson, C. (2007). My life in care: Experiences of non-participation in decision-making processes. Child & Family Social Work, 12(3), 268-277. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00499.x Leslie, L. K., Landsverk, J. A., Ezzet-Lofstrom, R., Tschann, J. M., Slymen, D. J., & Garland, A. F. (2000). Children in foster care: Factors influencing outpatient mental health service use. Child Abuse and Neglect, 24(4), 465-476.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0145-2134(00)00116-2 Lewis, A. (2010). Silence in the context of ‘child voice’. Children & society, 24(1), 14-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2008.00200.x Lundy, L. (2007). Voice is not enough: Conceptualizing Article 12 of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child.” British Educational Research Journal, 33(6), 927-942. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920701657033 Lundy, L. (2018). In defence of tokenism? Implementing children's right to participate in collective decision-making. Childhood, 25(3), 340-354.https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568218777292 Mannion, G. (2007). Going spatial, going relational: Why "listening to children" and children's participation needs reframing. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 28(3), 405-420.https://doi.org/10.1080/01596300701458970 McCarthy, E. (2016). Young people in residential care, their participation and the influencing factors. Child Care in Practice, 22(4), 368-385.https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2016.1188763 McLeod, A. (2006). Respect or empowerment? Alternative understandings of 'listening' in childcare social work. Adoption & Fostering, 30(4), 43-52.https://doi.org/10.1177/030857590603000407 McLeod, A. (2007). Whose agenda? Issues of power and relationship when listening to looked-after young people. Child & Family Social Work, 12(3), 278-286.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2007.00493.x Mitra, D. L. (2008). Balancing power in communities of practice: An examination of increasing student voice through school-based youth–adult partnerships. Journal of Educational Change, 9, 221-242.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-007-9061-7 Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2016). Understanding service engagement: Young people's experience of service use. Journal of Social Work, 16(3), 283–302.https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017315569676 Nadan, Y. (2017). Rethinking 'cultural competence' in international social work. International Social Work, 60(1), 74-83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814539986 Percy-Smith, B. (2010). Councils, consultations and community: Rethinking the spaces for children and young people's participation. Children's Geographies, 8(2), 107-122.https://doi.org/10.1080/14733281003691368 Pert, H., Diaz, C., & Thomas, N. (2017). Children's participation in LAC reviews: a study in one E nglish local authority. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 1-10.https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12194 Pösö, T. (2015). How to assess the best interests of the child in out-of-home placements? Reflections based on Finnish child protection cases. In A. Skehill & J. Shemmings (Eds.), The child protection practice handbook. Open University Press. Powers, J. L., & Tiffany, J. S. (2006). Engaging youth in participatory research and evaluation. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 12 (Suppl.), S79-S87.DOI: 10.1097/00124784-200611001-00015 Rauktis, M. E., Fusco, R. A., Cahalane, H., Bennett, I. K., & Reinhart, S. M. (2011). “Try to make it seem like we're regular kids”: Youth perceptions of restrictiveness in out of-home care. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(7), 1224-1233.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2011.02.012 Richards‐Schuster, K. (2012). Empowering the voice of youth: The role of youth advisory councils in grant making focused on youth. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(136), 87-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20036 Roesch-Marsh, A. (2014). 'Out of control': Making sense of the behaviour of young people referred to secure accommodation. British Journal of Social Work, 44(2), 197-213.https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcs102 Runeson, I., Hallström, I., Elander, G., & Hermerén, G. (2002). Children’s participation in the decision-making process during hospitalization: an observational study. Nursing ethics, 9(6), 583-598. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733002ne553oa Sæbjørnsen, S. E. N., & Willumsen, E. (2017). Service user participation in interprofessional teams in child welfare in Norway: vulnerable adolescents' perceptions. Child & Family Social Work, 22, 43-53.https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12242 Sinclair, R. (2004). Participation in practice: Making it meaningful, effective and sustainable. Children & society, 18(2), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/chi.817 Skivenes, M., & Strandbu, A. (2006). A child perspective and children's participation. Children, youth and environments, 16(2), 10-27.http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.16.2.0010 Stoecklin, D. (2013). Theories of action in the field of child participation: In search of explicit frameworks. Childhood, 20(4), 443-457.https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568212466901 Taft, J. K., & Gordon, H. R. (2013). Youth activists, youth councils, and constrained democracy. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 8(1), 87-100.https://doi.org/10.1177/1746197913475765 Taylor, M., & Percy-Smith, B. (2008). Children's participation: learning from and forcommunity development. International Journal of Children's Rights, 16(3), 379-394.https://doi.org/10.1163/157181808x311213 Taylor, N. (2006). What do we know about involving children and young people in family law decision making? A research update. Australian Journal of Family Law, 20(2), 154-178. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806292430 Ten Brummelaar, M. D. C., Harder, A. T., Kalverboer, M. E., Post, W. J., & Knorth, E. J. (2018). Participation of youth in decision-making procedures during residential care: A narrative review. Child and Family Social Work, 23(1), 33-44.https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12381 Theis, J. (2009). Children as active citizens: An agenda for children’s civil rights and civic engagement. In B. Percy-Smith & N. Thomas (Eds.), A handbook of children and young people’s participation (pp. 365–377). Routledge. Thomas, N., & O'Kane, C. (1999). Children's participation in reviews and planning meetings when they are 'looked after' in middle childhood. Child and Family Social Work, 4(3), 221-230. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2206.1999.00112.x Thomas, N. (2007). Towards a theory of children's participation. International Journal of Children's Rights, 15(2), 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1163/092755607X206489 Thomas, N., & Percy‐Smith, B. (2012). ‘It's about changing services and building relationships’: evaluating the development of Children in Care Councils. Child & Family Social Work, 17(4), 487-496.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2011.00806.x Toros, K., & LaSala, M. (2019). Child protection workers' understanding of the meaning and value of self-reflection in Estonia. Reflective Practice, 20(2), 266–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1588718 United Nations Children’s Fund. (2020). Engaged and heard! Guidelines on adolescent participation and civic engagement. van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. (2015). Children's and young people's participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20(2), 129-138.https://doi.org/10.1111/cfs.12082 Vis, S. A., Holtan, A., & Thomas, N. (2012). Obstacles for child participation in care and protection cases—why Norwegian social workers find it difficult. Child abuse review, 21(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.1155 Whittaker, A., Havard, T., & Williams, C. (2016). Safeguarding in residential care: Understanding good practice. Social Care Institute for Excellence. London, UK. Wildeman, C., & Emanuel, N. (2014). Cumulative risks of foster care placement by age 18 for U.S. children, 2000–2011. Plos One Journal, 9(3), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0092785 Winter, K. (2009). Relationships matter: the problems and prospects for social workers’ relationships with young children in care. Child & Family Social Work, 14(4), 450-460. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2206.2009.00628.x Wyness, M. (2009). Children representing children: Participation and the problem of diversity in UK youth councils. Childhood, 16(4), 535-552.https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568209344274 Zeldin, S., Christens, B. D., & Powers, J. L. (2013). The psychology and practice of youth-adult partnership: Bridging generations for youth development and community change. American journal of community psychology, 51(3-4), 385-397.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9558-y | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97904 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 根據《兒童權利公約》，兒童應被視為有能力表達意見的主體，在與自身相關事務中享有參與決策的權利。現有文獻肯定集體參與制度的潛力，但對安置脈絡下實務經驗討論有限，亦缺乏相關實證研究。本研究旨在探討「園生代表制」於安置機構中的實際運作方式及其如何形塑兒少表意權之實踐樣態。採用質性之個案研究法，選取曾實施「園生代表制」的安置機構為場域，訪談5名園生及6名工作者，並輔以園代會議紀錄與申訴資料，進行主題與內容分析。研究結果顯示，園生代表制確實促進兒少參與家園事務，提升其表意能力、自主性與能動性，有助於家規調整，平衡兒少需求與機構管理，同時提升兒少福祉。不過，安置機構雖試圖由權控轉向尊重與合作模式，仍受限於結構與環境因素，兒少表意空間有限，難以真正共享決策。此外，園生代表制可能加劇權力落差，需謹慎界定職權並預警潛在風險，特別是在園代制與申訴機制銜接時，應明確區分集體議題與個別申訴，避免混淆與負面影響。再者，推動表意機制前，應優先培養兒少權利意識與權利能力，並強化工作者的培訓與支持。所有制度參與者需在認知、期待與共識上達成一致，以減少落差造成之阻力。最後，園生代表制並非適用於所有安置體系，應審慎評估其適配性。本研究提出之建議如下：政府應統整安置機構推動兒少參與的實務經驗，制定明確指引，投入足夠人力、經費與培訓，協助機構落實參與機制；學界應深化相關研究，透過多元個案與脈絡分析，探索穩定可行的兒少參與模式；機構推動園生代表制時，需確保兒少與工作人員充分知情準備，循序導入機制，並結合多元表意管道與申訴制度，保障兒少表達與決策權利。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | According to the Convention on the Rights of the Child, children are recognized as capable of expressing and participating in decisions affecting them. However, Collective participation mechanisms show potential, but practical experience and empirical research in this context remain scarce. This study aims to explore how the Foster Youth Representative Council operates within residential care institutions and how it shapes the practice of children’s right to be heard. Using a qualitative case study approach, the research draws on interviews with five youths and six staff members, as well as analysis of council records and grievance documents through thematic and content analysis. Findings reveal that the council enhances youth participation, autonomy, agency, and well-being by facilitating adjustments to house rules that balance the needs of youth with institutional management. However, structural and environmental constraints limit genuine shared decision-making, while the council risks reinforcing internal power imbalances. Critical measures include clearly defining representative roles, differentiating collective issues from individual complaints, and cultivating children's rights awareness alongside comprehensive staff training. Consensus among stakeholders is essential to reduce implementation barriers. As the model's efficacy is context-dependent, prudent assessment of institutional suitability is required. The study recommends that governments consolidate institutional practices with clear guidelines and adequate resources; researchers deepen empirical investigations into participatory models through comparative case analysis; and institutions implement mechanisms gradually with preparation, integrating diverse expression channels to safeguard children's rights. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-22T16:08:49Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-07-22T16:08:49Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 I
誌謝 II 摘要 III ABSTRACT IV 目次 V 表次 VII 第一章、緒論 1 第一節、研究背景 1 第二節、研究動機 6 第三節、研究問題與目的 9 第二章、文獻探討 10 第一節、安置機構的概況 11 第二節、兒童表意權 15 第三節、表意權在「安置體系」中的落實 33 第三章、研究方法 54 第一節、研究設計 54 第二節、研究對象 55 第三節、研究工具與資料蒐集 58 第四節、資料分析 62 第五節、研究嚴謹性 64 第六節、研究倫理 66 第四章、研究結果 68 第一節、安置機構兒少與工作者心中的表意權 68 第二節、園生代表制的誕生 76 第三節、園生代表制的操作 81 第四節、園生代表制中表意權的實踐過程與影響 98 第五節、園生代表制的困境 110 第六節、園生代表制的建議 123 第五章、研究發現與討論 133 第一節、兒少表意權，從理論到實務、從分歧到共識 133 第二節、安置機構中的園生代表制 136 第三節、安置脈絡下被限縮的表意權 145 第六章、研究結論與建議 151 第一節、研究結論 151 第二節、研究建議 153 第三節、研究限制 155 第四節、研究後記與個人反思 156 參考文獻 158 中文文獻 158 英文文獻 162 附錄一、研究參與者訪談大綱 174 附錄二、研究參與者知情同意書 178 研究參與者知情同意書（兒少版）178 研究參與者知情同意書（工作人員版）182 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 安置機構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策共享 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 兒童參與 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 園生代表制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 表意權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 安置機構 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 決策共享 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 兒童參與 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 園生代表制 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 表意權 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | residential care | en |
| dc.subject | shared decision-making | en |
| dc.subject | residential care | en |
| dc.subject | right to be heard | en |
| dc.subject | foster youth representative council | en |
| dc.subject | child participation | en |
| dc.subject | shared decision-making | en |
| dc.subject | child participation | en |
| dc.subject | foster youth representative council | en |
| dc.subject | right to be heard | en |
| dc.title | 探討安置機構實踐表意權的作法－以園生代表制為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring Practices of the Right to be Heard in Residential Care: A Case Study of Foster Youth Representative Council | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳毓文;林沛君 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yu-Wen Chen;Pei-Chun Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 安置機構,表意權,園生代表制,兒童參與,決策共享, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | residential care,right to be heard,foster youth representative council,child participation,shared decision-making, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 185 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202501783 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-07-16 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 社會工作學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-07-23 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 社會工作學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 3.21 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。