Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 生物產業傳播暨發展學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97873
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor梁朝雲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChao-Yun Liangen
dc.contributor.author康仁俊zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorJen-Chun Kangen
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-21T16:05:21Z-
dc.date.available2025-07-22-
dc.date.copyright2025-07-21-
dc.date.issued2025-
dc.date.submitted2025-07-14-
dc.identifier.citation中文參考文獻
王柏崴、黃禎貞、唐孝蘭、葉國樑、曾治乾(2009)。台北市國中學生綠色消費知識、態度、行為意圖及其相關因素研究:以某國中為例。科學教育學刊,17(3),255-247。https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.2009.1703.03
王馨敏、李俊仁、張鑑如(2015)。「二至五歲幼兒認知發展家長問卷」之編製。測驗學刊,62(4),279-302。
池文海、黃庭鍾、張智銘(2009)。一般民眾使用膳食補給品之行為意圖研究。台南科大學報,28,133-154。https://doi.org/10.6970/JTUTART.200910.0133
朱文禎、陳哲賢(2007)。探討虛擬社群之知識分享行為:以線上遊戲社群為例。電子商務研究,5(1),55-80。https://doi.org/10.29767/ECS.200703.0004
何吉森(2018)。假新聞之監理與治理探討。傳播研究與實踐,8(1),1-41。https://doi.org/10.6123/JCRP.2018.07_8(2).0001
汪志堅、賴明政(2001)。消費者對電子佈告欄所流傳產品瑕疵謠言之態度。廣告學研究,16,31-54。
李威龍、留淑芳、劉明宗(2005)。網路口耳相傳訊息數量、訊息方向暨性別對訊息說服效果之影響。行銷科學學報,1(2),165-201。
林東清、孫培真、徐景智(2000)。影響資訊系統使用者抗拒行為之原因:以計劃行為理論為基礎之整合研究。資訊管理研究,2(2),1-26。https://doi.org/10.6188/JEB.2000.2(2).01
林南宏、王文正、邱聖媛、鍾怡君(2007)。產品知識及品牌形象對購買意願的影響:產品類別的干擾效果。行銷評論,4(4),481-504。https://doi.org/10.29931/MR.200712.0005
林家五、宋進福(2008)。消費者對價格保證策略的反應:知覺可信度的效果。臺大管理論叢,18(2),197-228。https://doi.org/10.6226/NTURM2008.18.2.197
林群惟、郭倫嘉、馮堃齊、翁子閔(2011)。於廣告推播系統中應用拉格朗日乘數法實現一個具優先權時效特性的同儕網路封包排程技術。電腦與通訊,137,19-26。https://doi.org/10.29917/CCLTJ.201102.0004
徐美苓(2015)。影響新聞可信度與新聞素養效能因素之探討。中華傳播學刊,27,99-136。https://doi.org/10.6195/cjcr.2015.27.04
章明哲(2020)。網路散播鳳梨滯銷假訊息,推銷鳳梨乾發災難財。公視新聞網。檢自:https://news.pts.org.tw/article/471694
陳美如、王渝薇、范錚強(2016)。玩線上遊戲是計劃行為嗎?從非計劃型的因素探討。資訊管理學報,23(2),217-246。
康仁俊、梁朝雲(2024)。初探農產品政治消費的資訊傳播:以萊牛豬進口商品和媒體相關工作者為例。教育資料與圖書館學,61(1),57-84。https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202403_61(1).0017.RS.BM
黃佳琳(2018)。旗美香蕉慘況遭封鎖?高市府:11年前的舊照。自由時報。檢自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/life/breakingnews/2448299
黃俊儒(2014)。科學傳播中「確定」與「不確定」的敘事:以莫拉克風災系列報導為例。科技、醫療與社會,19,73-116。https://doi.org/10.6464/TJSSTM.201410_(19).0002
黃俊儒、簡妙如(2010)。在科學與媒體的接壤中所開展之科學傳播研究:從科技社會公民的角色及需求出發。新聞學研究,105,127-166。https://doi.org/10.30386/MCR.201010_(105).0004
黃捷(2019)。謠傳把農漁民存款搬海外,全國農業金庫今告70網友。自由時報。檢自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/society/breakingnews/2926077
楊淑閔、謝佳珍、吳哲豪(2018)。陳吉仲質疑國民黨散播謠言,籲向農民道歉。中央通訊社。檢自:https://today.line.me/tw/v2/article/Dve6KX
楊媛婷(2023)。Linbay好油造謠進口蛋一次看,律師踢爆不符事實、引起恐慌。自由時報。檢自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/politics/breakingnews/4446880
顏榮宏、梁朝雲、林福容(2019)。消費者獲悉農業假訊息後對其消費意願的影響。臺灣農會學報,20(2),83-101。https://doi.org/10.6730/JAAT.202004_20(2).0002
羅文伶、邱銘心(2015)。網路健康謠言內容分析研究。教育資料與圖書館學,52(1),3-11。https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2015.521/0647.RS.BM
蕭乃沂、盧志山、趙文彬、賴怡君(2002)。民眾使用網路報稅的評估:計劃行為理論的初探。公共行政學報,6,67-86。
蕭禾秦、梁朝雲(2022)。預防食安假訊息的影響因素及其效果:以計劃行為理論為基礎。臺灣農學會報,21(4),213-235。https://doi.org/10.6730/JAAT.202111_21(4).0001
蕭維傑、王維菁(2018)。動態消息演算法、能見度、與新聞經營:以Facebook平台為例。資訊社會研究,34,63-104。https://doi.org/10.29843/JCCIS.201801_(34).0003
 
英文參考文獻
Abela, J. J. (2018). The effect of consumer characteristics and behaviour on pork consumption in Malta: A quantitative study. MCAST Journal of Applied Research & Practice, 2(1), 44-59.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Ajzen, I. (2016). Consumer attitudes and behavior: The theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Italian Review of Agricultural Economics, 70(2), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-18003
Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314-324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195
Alemanno, A. (2018). Editorial: How to counter fake news? A taxonomy of anti-fake news approaches. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 9, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.12.
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), 211-236. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.31.2.211
Allern, S., & Pollack, E. (2019). Journalism as a public good: A Scandinavian perspective. Journalism, 20(11), 1423-1439. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884917730945
Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
Anwar, A., Malik, M., Raees, V., & Anwar, A. (2020). Role of mass media and public health communications in the COVID-19 pandemic. Cureus, 12(9), e10453. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.10453
Arian, A., & Shamir, M. (1983). The primarily political functions of the left-right continuum. Comparative Politics, 15(2), 139-158. https://doi.org/10.2307/421673
Atkinson, L. (2015). Locating the politics in political consumption: A conceptual map of four types of political consumer identities. International Journal of Communication, 9, 2047-2066.
Atkinson, L. & Rosenthal, S. (2014). Signaling the green sell: The influence of eco-label source, argument specificity, and product involvement on consumer trust. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 33-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2013.834803.
Baek, Y. M. (2010). To buy or not to buy: Who are political consumers? What do they think and how do they participate? Political Studies, 58(5), 1065-1086. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2010.00832.x
Bakker, P. (2012). Aggregation, content farms and huffinization: The rise of low-pay and no-pay journalism. Journalism Practice, 6(5-6), 627-637. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2012.667266.
Bakshy, E., Messing, S., & Adamic, L. (2015). Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science, 348, 1130-1132. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa1160
Bärebring, L., Palmqvist, M., Winkvist, A., & Augustin, H. (2020). Gender differences in perceived food healthiness and food avoidance in a Swedish population-based survey: A cross sectional study. Nutrition Journal, 19, 140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-020-00659-0
Bauer, P. C., Barberá, P., Ackermann, K. & Venetz, A. (2017). Is the left–right scale a valid measure of ideology? Individual-level variation in associations with “left” and “right” and left-right self-placement. Political Behavior, 39(3), 553-583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9368-2
Baumann, S., Engman, A., & Johnston, J. (2015). Shopping for change? Political consumption, conventional politics, and high cultural capital. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 39(5), 413-421. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12223
Becker, A. B., & Copeland, L. (2016). Networked publics: How connective social media use facilitates political consumerism among LGBT Americans. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(1), 22-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2015.1131655
Bhattacherjee, A. (2022). The effects of news source credibility and fact-checker credibility on users’ beliefs and intentions regarding online misinformation. Journal of Electronic Business & Digital Economics, 1(1/2), 24-33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEBDE-09-2022-0031
Biswas, D., Biswas, A., & Das, N. (2006). The differential effects of celebrity and expert endorsements on consumer risk perceptions: The role of consumer knowledge, perceived congruency, and product technology orientation. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 17-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2006.10639231
Bode, L., & Vrada, E. K. (2015). In related news, that was wrong: The correction of misinformation through related stories functionality in social media. Journal of Communication, 65(4), 619-638. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12166
Bodur, H. O., Brinberg, D., & Coupey, E. (2000). Belief, affect, and attitude: Alternative models of the determinants of attitude. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 9(1), 17-28. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp0901_2
Bornkessel, S., Bröringa, S., Omta, S. W. F. & van Trijp, H. (2014). What determines ingredient awareness of consumers? A study on ten functional food ingredients. Food Quality and Preference, 32, 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2013.09.007
Boukes, M., Jones, N. P., & Vliegenthart, R. (2022). Newsworthiness and story prominence: How the presence of news factors relates to upfront position and length of news stories. Journalism, 23(1), 98-116. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919899313
Boulianne, S. (2022). Socially mediated political consumerism, Information, Communication & Society, 25(5), 609-617. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2021.2020872
Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Bimber, B. (2020). Right-wing populism, social media and echo chambers. New Media & Society, 22(4), 683-699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444819893983
Boutyline, A., & Wille, R. (2016). The social structure of political echo chambers. Political Psychology, 38(3), 551-569. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12337
Buchanan, T. (2021). Trust, personality, and belief as determinants of the organic reach of political disinformation on social media, 1-12. Social Science Journal, https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2021.1975085
Caled, D., & Silva, M. J. (2022). Digital media and misinformation: An outlook on multidisciplinary strategies against manipulation. Journal of Computational Social Science, 5(1), 123-159. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-021-00118-8
Casais, B., & Faria, J. (2022). The intention-behavior gap in ethical consumption: Mediators, moderators and consumer profiles based on ethical priorities. Journal of Macromarketing, 42(1), 100-113. https://doi.org/10.1177/02761467211054836
Casais, B., & Proença, J. F. (2022). The use of positive and negative appeals in social advertising: A content analysis of television ads for preventing HIV/AIDS. International Review on Public and Nonproft Marketing, 19(3), 623-647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00318-y
Chakraborty, U. (2019). Perceived credibility of online hotel reviews and its impact on hotel booking intentions. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 31(9), 3465-3483. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-11-2018-0928
Chakraborty, U., & Bhat, S. (2017). The effects of credible online reviews on brand equity dimensions and its consequence on consumer behavior. Journal of Promotion Management, 24(1), 57-82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10496491. 2017.1346541
Chau, P. Y. K., Au, G., & Tam, K. Y. (2000). Impact of information presentation modes on online shopping: An empirical evaluation of a broadband interactive shopping service. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 10(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327744JOCE100101
Cheruiyot, D. (2024). Comparing risks to journalism: Media criticism in the digital hate. Digital Journalism, 12(3), 294-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2030243
Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012. 06.008
Chih, W. H., Wang, K. Y., Hsu, L. C., & Huang, S. C. (2013). Investigating electronic word-of-mouth effects on online discussion forums: The role of perceived positive electronic word-of-mouth review credibility. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 16(9), 658-668. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0364
Choi, W. (2020). Older adults’ credibility assessment of online health information: An exploratory study using an extended typology of web credibility. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 71(11), 1295-1307. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24341
Chow, C. W. C., Chow, C. S. F., Lai, J. Y. M., & Zhang, L. L. (2022). Online group-buying: The effect of deal popularity on consumer purchase intention. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(2), 387-399. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2013
Cinelli, M., De Francisci Morales, G., Galeazzi, A., Quattrociocchi, W., & Starnini, M. (2021). The echo chambers on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Clark, C., Tan, A. C., & Ho, K. (2018). Confronting the costs of its past success: Revisiting Taiwan’s post-authoritarian political and economic development. Asian Politics & Policy, 10(3), 460-484. https://doi.org/10.1111/aspp.12400
Copeland, L. (2014). Value change and political action: Postmaterialism, political consumerism, and political participation. American Politics Research, 42(2), 257-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X13494
Copeland, L., & Becker, A. B. (2019). Voting at the ballot box and in the marketplace during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 31(4), 767-778. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/edy028
Copeland, L., & Boulianne, S. (2022). Political consumerism: A meta-analysis. International Political Science Review, 43(1), 3-18. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512120905048
Cota, W., Ferreira, S. C., Pastor-Satorras, R., & Starnini, M. (2019). Quantifying echo chamberss in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science, 8, 35. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0213-9
Dalton, R. J. (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56(1), 76-98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00718.x
Dennis, A. R., Fuller, R. M., & Valacich, J. S. (2008). Media, tasks, and communication processes: A theory of media synchronicity. MIS Quarterly, 32(3), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148857
Dholakia, U. M. (1997). An investigation of the relationship between perceived risk and product involvement. Advances in Consumer Research, 24, 159-167.
DiFonzo, N., Bordia, P., & Rosnow, R. L. (1994). Reining in rumors. Organizational Dynamics, 23(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616 (94) 90087-6.
Drążkowski, D., & Trepanowski, R. (2021). Reactance and perceived disease severity as determinants of COVID-19 vaccination intention: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 27(10), 2171-2178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.2014060
Dubois, E., & Blank, G. (2018). The echo chamber is overstated: The moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, Communication & Society, 21(5), 729-745. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1428656
Earl, J., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. (2017). Routing around organizations: Self-directed political consumption. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 22(2), 131-153.
Eberly, K. (2019). Establishing and enforcing a right to truthful information about pig farming in a fake news era. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 34(2), 291-312.
Echegaray, F. (2015). Voting at the marketplace: Political consumerism in Latin America. Latin American Research Review, 50(2), 176-199. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.2015.0032 
Ecker, U. K. H., Lewandowsky, S., & Chadwick, M. (2020). Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00241-6
Endres, K., & Panagopoulos, C. (2017). Boycotts, buycotts, and political consumerism in America. Research and Politics, 4(4), 205316801773863. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017738632
Ettinger, D., & Jehiel, P. (2021). An experiment on deception, reputation and trust. Experimental Economics, 24(3), 821-853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-020-09681-9
Everard, A., & Galletta, D. F. (2005). How presentation flaws affect perceived site quality, trust, and intention to purchase from an online store. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 56-95. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222220303
Fischer, H., & Fleming, S. (2024). Why metacognition matters in politically contested domains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 28(9), 783-785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2024.06.005
Flaxman, S., Goel, S., & Rao, J. M. (2016). Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public Opinion Quarterly, 80(S1), 298-320. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfw006
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Gaarder, E. (2011). Where the boys aren’t: The predominance of women in animal rights activism. Feminist Formations, 23(2), 54-76. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41301656
Garrison, B. (2000). Journalists’ perceptions of online information-gathering problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 77(3), 500-514. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769900007700303
Gershaneck, K. K. (2021). Media warfare: How Taiwan can win the battle for the cognitive domain. Prospect & Exploration, 19(1), 66-101.
Ghahtarani, A., Sheikhmohammady, M., & Rostami, M. (2020). The impact of social capital and social interaction on customers’ purchase intention, considering knowledge sharing in social commerce context. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 5(3), 191-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2019.08.004
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Copeland, L., & Bimber, B. (2014). Political consumerism: Civic engagement and the social media connection. New Media & Society, 16(3), 488-506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444813487960
Godler, Y., & Reich, Z. (2013). How journalists think about facts. Journalism Studies, 14(1), 94-112. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2012.689489
Gotlieb, M. R., & Cheema, S. E. (2017). From consumer to producer: Motivations, internet use, and political consumerism. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 570-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1202301
Gries, P., & Su, J. (2013). Taiwanese views of China and the world: Party identification, ethnicity, and cross–strait relations. Japanese Journal of Political Science, 14(1), 73-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1468109912000357
Grünbaum, N. N., & Stenger, M. (2015). Is the phenomenon political consumption overrated? Uncovering political intentions and values of organic food consumption. European Scientific Journal, 11(3), 285-299.
Grünhage, T., & Reuter, M. (2021). What makes diets political? Moral foundations and the left-wing-vegan connection. Social Justice Research, 34, 18-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-020-00361-w
Guidetti, M., Carraro, L., & Cavazza, N. (2022). Dining with liberals and conservatives: The social underpinnings of food neophobia. PLoS One, 17(1), e0262676. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0262676.
Gundelach, B. (2020). Political consumerism: A comparative analysis of established and developing democracies. International Political Science Review, 41(2), 159-173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512118819211.
Ha, E. Y., & Lee, H. (2018). Projecting service quality: The effects of social media reviews on service perception. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 69, 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2017.09.006
Hagar, N., Wachs, J., & Horvát, E. Á. (2021). Writer movements between news outlets reflect political polarization in media. New Media & Society, 25(8), 2034-2056.. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211027173
Hanzaee, K. H., & Taghipourian, M. J. (2012). The effects of brand credibility and prestige on consumers purchase intention in low and high product involvement. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(2), 1281-1291.
Hasell, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2016). Partisan provocation: The role of partisan news use and emotional responses in political information sharing in social media. Human Communication Research, 42(4), 641-661. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12092
Havitz, M. E., & Mannell, R. C. (2005). Enduring involvement, situational involvement, and flow in leisure and non-leisure activities. Journal of Leisure Research, 37(2), 152-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2005.11950048
Heath, R. (2000). Low involvement processing: A new model of brands and advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 19(3), 287-298.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hilbig, B. E. (2009). Sad, thus true: Negativity bias in judgments of truth. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 983-986. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.04.012
Himma-Kadakas, M. (2017). Alternative facts and fake news entering journalistic content production cycle. Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 25-41. https://doi.org/10.5130/ccs.v9i2.5469
Hodges, L. W. (1986). The journalist and professionalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 1(2), 32-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/08900528609358264
Hong, L., & Lee, Y.-A. (2010). A study on the effects of advertising placement format and TV program involvement on consumers’ memory and attitude toward advertising. Korean Journal of Consumer and Advertising Psychology, 11(3), 553-577. https://doi.org/10.21074/kjlcap.2010.11.3.553
Huang, L., Bai, L., & Gong, S. (2020). The effects of carrier, benefit, and perceived trust in information channel on functional food purchase intention among Chinese consumers. Food Quality and Preference, 81, 103854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103854
Hung, T.-C., & Hung, T.-W. (2022). How China’s cognitive warfare works: A frontline perspective of Taiwan’s anti-disinformation wars. Journal of Global Security Studies, 7(4), ogac016. https://doi.org/10.1093/jogss/ogac016
Hunt, K. P., & Wald, D. M. (2020). The role of scientific source credibility and goodwill in public skepticism toward GM foods. Environmental Communication, 14(7), 971-986. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2020.1725086
Imhoff, R., et al. (2022). Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 6, 392-403. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01258-7
Iyengar, S., & Sean J. W. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 690-707. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12152
Izogo E, E., Jayawardhena, C., & Karjaluoto, H. (2022). Negative eWOM and perceived credibility: A potent mix in consumer relationships. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 51(2), 149-169. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-01-2022-0039
James, B. B., & Ronald, M. L. (2015). Intershop: Enhancing the vendor/customer dialectic in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11(4), 9-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1995.11518058
Joshi, Y., & Rahman, Z. (2019). Consumers’ sustainable purchase behaviour: Modeling the impact of psychological factors. Ecological Economics, 159, 235-243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.025
Kaiser, F. G., Oerke, B., & Bogner, F. X. (2007). Behavior-based environmental attitude: Development of an instrument for adolescents. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(3), 242-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.004
Kam, C. D., & Deichert, M. (2020). Boycotting, buycotting, and the psychology of political consumerism. The Journal of Politics, 82(1), 72-88. https://doi.org/10.1086/705922.
Kang, J.-C., & Liang, C. (2023). Determinants of the backfire effect: Discrepancies between two groups with different political orientations. Informacios Tarsadalom, 23(4), 38-57. https://dx.doi.org/10.22503/inftars.XXIII.2023.4.3
Karpińska-Krakowiak, M. (2014). Conceptualizing and measuring consumer engagement in social media: Implications for personal involvement. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 13(1), 49-65.
Katsirea, I. (2018). “Fake news”: Reconsidering the value of untruthful expression in the face of regulatory uncertainty. Journal of Media Law, 10(2), 159-188. https://doi.org/10.1080/17577632.2019.1573569
Kelm, O., & Dohle, M. (2018). Information, communication and political consumerism: How (online) information and (online) communication influence boycotts and buycotts. New Media & Society, 20(4), 1523-1542. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817699842
Kim, M. (2018). How do formats and information presentation modalities influence viewer’s recall, recognition and brand awareness? The Online Journal of Communication and Media, 4(4), 16-22.
Kim, A., & Dennis, A. R. (2019). Says who? The effects of presentation format and source rating on fake news in social media. MIS Quarterly, 43(3), 1025-1039. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2019/15188
Kim, B. J., & Chung, J.-B. (2021). When beef consumption becomes politicized: Longitudinal change of US beef purchase intention and political values in Korea. Food Policy, 105, 102171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102171
Kim, S., & Hasher, L. (2005). The attraction effect in decision making: Superior performance by older adults. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 58(1), 120-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000160
Kitchens, B., Johnson, S. L., & Gray, P. (2020). Understanding echo chambers and filter bubbles: The impact of social media on diversification and partisan shifts in news consumption. MIS Quarterly, 44(4), 1619-1649. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2020/16371
Knight, M., & Cook, C. (2013). Social media for journalists: Principles and practice. London: Sage.
Koch, T., Peter, C., & Obermaier, M. (2013). Optimisten glaubt man nicht. Wie sich valenzbasiertes Framing auf die Glaubwürdigkeit von Aussagen und deren Kommunikator auswirkt [Optimists do not believe you. How valence based framing affects the credibility of statements and their communicator]. Medien & Kommunikationswissenschaft, 61(4), 551-567. https://doi.org/10.5771/1615-634x-2013-4-551
Koohikamali, M., & Sidorova, A. (2017). Information re-sharing on social network sites in the Age of fake news. Information Science: The International Journal of Emerging Transdiscipline. 20, 215-235. https://doi.org/10.28945/3871
Koos, S. (2012). What drives political consumption in Europe? A multi-level analysis on individual characteristics, opportunity structures and globalization. Acta Sociologica, 55(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001699311431594
Kusumasondjaja, S., Shanka, T., & Marchegiani, C. (2012). Credibility of online reviews and initial trust: The roles of reviewer’s identity and review valence. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 18(3), 185-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356766712449365 
Lampe, C., Vitak, J., Gray, R. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2012). Perceptions of facebook’s value as an information source. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3195-3204). https://doi.org/10.1145/2207676.2208739
Lazer, D. M. J. et al. (2018). The science of fake news: Addressing fake news requires a multidisciplinary effort. Science, 359(6380), 1094-1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
Lee, W.-I., Cheng, S.-Y., & Shih, Y.-T. (2017). Effects among product attributes, involvement, word-of-mouth, and purchase intention in online shopping. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(4), 223-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.007
LeBlanc, D. C. (2004). Statistics: Concepts and applications for science (p.162). Sudbury, MA: Jones & Bartlett.
Leung, A. N. M., Wong, N., & Farver, J. M. (2018). You are what you read: The belief systems of cyber-bystanders on social networking sites. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 365. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00365
Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., Seifert, C. M., Schwarz, N., & Cook, J. (2012). Misinformation and its correction: Continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 13(3), 106-131. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
Li, L. Q., Gao, J., Shi, Z., & Song, W. (2022). The influence of self-construal on frequency of user activities and advertisement involvement in MsgSN. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(5), 934-945. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1846788
Liang, C. (2020). Exploring journalists’ intentions to become social entrepreneurs. Journalism Studies, 21(14), 1933-1951. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2020.1799239
Liang, C., Ip, C. Y., Wu, S.-C., Law, K. M. Y., Wang, J.-H., Peng, L.-P., & Liu, H.-C. (2019). Personality traits, social capital, and entrepreneurial creativity: Comparing green socioentrepreneurial intentions across Taiwan and Hong Kong. Studies in Higher Education, 44(6), 1086-1105. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1418310
Liang, S., Zhang, M., Chu, Y., & He, L. (2022). Should “green” be precise? The effect of information presentation on purchasing intention of green products. Sustainability, 14(16), 10291. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su141610291
Liao, K.-H., Chang, C.-C., Lin, J.-S., & Liang, C. (2014). Discovering the imaginative capability of technology writers: Indicators, roots, and cultivation. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 14, 76-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2014.09.002
Liebertz, S., & Bunch, J. (2021). Backfiring frames: Abortion politics, religion, and attitude resistance. Politics and Religion, 14(3), 403-430. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755048320000310
Liu, H.-C., Chang, C.-C., Liang, C.-T., Ip, C. Y., & Liang, C. (2019). Kindling social entrepreneurial journalism. Journalism Practice, 13(7), 873-885. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2018.1564884
Liu, W., & Ji, R. (2018). Examining the role of online reviews in Chinese online group buying context: The moderating effect of promotional marketing. Social Sciences, 7(8), 141-157. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsc i7080141
Luzsa, R., & Mayr, S. (2021). False consensus in the echo chamber: Exposure to favorably biased social media news feeds leads to increased perception of public support for own opinions. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 15(1), article 3. https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-1-3
Madani, F., Seenivasan, S., & Ma, J. (2021). Determinants of store patronage: The roles of political ideology, consumer and market characteristics. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 63, 102691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2021.102691
Maity, M., Dass, M., & Kumar, P. (2018). The impact of media richness on consumer information search and choice. Journal of Business Research, 87, 36-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.02.003
Malka, A., Soto, C. J., Inzlicht, M., & Lelkes, Y. (2014). Do needs for security and certainty predict cultural and economic conservatism? A cross-national analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 106(6), 1031-1051. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036170
Malloy, L. C., & Pearson-Merkowitz, S. (2016). Going positive: The effects of negative and positive advertising on candidate success and voter turnout. Research and Politics, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015625078
Meitz, T. G. K., Ort, A., Kalch, A., Zipfel, S., & Zurstiege, G. (2016). Source does matter: Contextual effects on online media-embedded health campaigns against childhood obesity. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 565-574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.067
Michaelidou, N., & Dibb, S. (2008). Consumer involvement: A new perspective. The Marketing Review, 8(1), 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934708X290403 
Mishra, A. S., Roy, S., & Bailey, A.A. (2015). Exploring brand personality-celebrity endorser personality congruence in celebrity endorse ments in the Indian context: Brand-celebrity personality. Psychology & Marketing, 32(12), 1158-1174. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20846
Møller, L. A. (2022). Between personal and public interest: How algorithmic news recommendation reconciles with journalism as an ideology. Digital Journalism, 10(10), 1794-1812. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2032782
Mou, J., Zhu, W. L., & Benyoucef, M. (2019). Impact of product description and involvement on purchase intention in cross-border e-commerce. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(3), 567-586. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-05-2019-0280
Muhammed, T. S., & Mathew, S. K. (2022). The disaster of misinformation: A review of research in social media. International Journal of Data Science and Analytics, 13, 271-285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41060-022-00311-6
Neilson, L. A. (2010). Boycott or buycott? Understanding political consumerism. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(3), 214-227. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.313
Neilson, L. A., & Paxton, P. (2010). Social capital and political consumerism: A multilevel analysis. Social Problems, 57(1), 5-24. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2010.57.1.5
Nerone, J. (2013). The historical roots of the normative model of journalism. Journalism, 14(4), 446-458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884912464177
Niklewicz, K. (2017). Weeding out fake news: An approach to social media regulation. European View, 16(2), 335. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-017-0468-0 
Nyhan, B. (2021). Why the backfire effect does not explain the durability of political misperceptions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), 118(15), e1912440117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912440117
Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2010). When corrections fail: The persistence of political misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2), 303-330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-010-9112-2
O’Cass, A. (2000). An assessment of consumers’ product, purchase decision, advertising and consumption involvement in fashion clothing. Journal of Economic Psychology, 21(5), 545-576. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-4870(00)00018-0
Ozaki, T., & Nakayachi, K. (2020). When descriptive norms backfire: Attitudes induce undesirable consequences during disaster preparation. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 20(1), 90-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12195
Painter-Morland, M., & Deslandes, G. (2017). Reconceptualizing CSR in the media industry as relational accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 143, 665–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3083-0
Park, D. H., & Lee, J. M. (2008). eWOM overload and its effect on consumer behavioral intention depending on consumer involvement. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap. 2007.11.004
Parks, C. M., & Toth, J. P. (2006). Fluency, familiarity, aging, and the illusion of truth. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 13(2), 225-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/138255890968691
Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature, 592(7855), 590-595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2
Peter, C., & Koch, T. (2016). When debunking scientific myths fails (and when it does not): The backfire effect in the context of journalistic coverage and immediate judgments as prevention strategy. Science Communication, 38(1), 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547015613523
Pooja, K., & Upadhyaya, P. (2024). What makes an online review credible? A systematic review of the literature and future research directions. Management Review Quarterly, 74, 627-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-022-00312-6
Pornpitakpan, C. (2004). The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(2), 243-281. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
Ramírez, A. S., Freres, D., Martinez, L. S., Lewis, N., Bourgoin, A., Kelly, B. J., Lee, C. J., Nagler, R., Schwartz, J. S., & Hornik, R. C. (2013). Information seeking from media and family/friends increases the likelihood of engaging in healthy lifestyle behaviors. Journal of Health Communication, 18(5), 527-542. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2012.743632
Revers, M. (2014). Journalistic professionalism as performance and boundary work: Source relations at the state house. Journalism, 15(1), 37-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884913480459
Rivis, A., & Sheeran, P. (2003). Descriptive norms as an additional predictor in the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Current Psychology, 22(3), 218-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-003-1018-2
Roe, D., & Bruwer, J. (2017). Self-concept, product involvement and consumption occasions: Exploring fine wine consumer behaviour. British Food Journal, 119(6), 1362–1377. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-10-2016-0476 
Roth-Cohen, O., Levy, S., & Zigdon, A. (2021). The mediated role of credibility on information sources and patient awareness toward patient rights. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(16), 8628. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18168628
Sample, C., Jensen, M. J., Scott, K., McAlaney, J., Fitchpatrick, S., Brockinton, A., Ormrod, D., & Ormrod, A. (2020). Interdisciplinary lessons learned while researching fake news. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 537612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.537612
Sasahara, K. (2019). You are what you eat: A social media study of food identity. Journal of Computational Social Science, 2(2), 103-117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42001-019-00039-7
Savolainen, R. (2008). Source preferences in the context of seeking problem-specific information. Information Processing and Management, 44(1), 274-293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2007.02.008
Schindler, J., & Müller, P. (2018). Design follows politics? The visualization of political orientation in newspaper page layout. Visual Communication, 17(2), 147035721774681. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217746812
Schwalb, M., García-Arrizabalaga, I., & Gibaja-Martíns, J.-J. (2023). Profile of the political consumer: An international comparative study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 35(3), 296-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2022.2103866
Skurnik, I., Yoon, C., Park, D. C., & Schwarz, N. (2005). How warnings about false claims become recommendations. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 713-724. https://doi.org/10.1086/426605 
Soliha, E., & Widyasari, S. (2018). Message framing and source credibility in product advertisements with high consumer involvement. European Research Studies Journal, 11(3), 413-422. https://doi.org/10.35808/ersj/1392
Spielmann, N., & Richard, M.-O. (2013). How captive is your audience? Defining overall advertising involvement. Journal of Business Research, 66(4), 499-505.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2011.12.002
Spears, N., & Singh, S. N. (2004). Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10641734.2004.10505164
Stolle, D., Hooghe, M., & Micheletti, M. (2005). Politics in the supermarket: Political consumerism as a form of political participation. International Political Science, 26(3), 245-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512105053784
Sun, Y., & Liang, C. (2020). Factors determining consumers’ purchase intentions towards dried fruits. International Journal of Fruit Science, 20(S2), S1072-S1096. https://doi.org/10.1080/15538362.2020.1774477
Sun, Y., & Liang, C. (2021). Effects of determinants of dried fruit purchase intention and the related consumer segmentation on e-commerce in China. British Food Journal, 123(3), 1133-1154. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-07-2020-0617
Sun, Y., & Liang, C. (2022). How headline strategies and news sources affect number of user clicks on WeChat. Journalism Practice, 17(8), 1696-1721.. https://doi.org/10.1080/17512786.2021.2008807
Swire-Thompson, B., DeGutis, J., & Lazer, D. (2020). Searching for the backfire effect: Measurement and design considerations. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 9(3), 286-299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2020.06.006
Te’eni-Hararis, T., & Lehman-Wilzig, S. N. (2009). The importance of product involvement for predicting advertising effectiveness among young people. International Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 203-229. https://doi.org/10.2501/S0265048709200540
Terren, L., & Borge-Bravo, R. (2021). Echo chambers on social media: A systematic review of the literature. Review of Communication Research, 9, 99-118. https://doi.org/10.12840/ISSN.2255-4165.028
Traberg, C. S., & van der Linden, S. (2022). Birds of a feather are persuaded together: Perceived source credibility mediates the effect of political bias on misinformation susceptibility. Personality and Individual Differences, 185(14), 111269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111269
Uhm, J.-P., Kim, S., Do, C., & Lee, H.-W. (2022). How augmented reality (AR) experience affects purchase intention in sport E-commerce: Roles of perceived diagnosticity, psychological distance, and perceived risks. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 67, 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103027
Vedejová, D., & Čavojová, V. (2022). Confirmation bias in information search, interpretation, and memory recall: Evidence from reasoning about four controversial topics. Thinking & Reasoning, 28(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2021.1891967
Vraga, E. K., Tully, M., Maksl, A., Craft, S., & Ashley, S. (2021). Theorizing news literacy behaviors. Communication Theory, 31(1), 1-21, https://doi.org/10.1093/ct/qtaa005
Wang, D., Zhou, Y., Qian, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022). The echo chambers of rumor rebuttal behavior of users in the early stage of COVID-19 epidemic in China. Computers in Human Behavior, 128, 107088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107088
Wang, L.-H., Yeh, S.-S., Chen, K.-Y., & Huan, T.-C. (2022). Tourists’ travel intention: Revisiting the TPB model with age and perceived risk as moderator and attitude as mediator. Tourism Review, 77(3), 877-896. https://doi.org/10.1108/TR-07-2021-0334
Wansink, B. (2006). Position of the American Dietetic Association: Food and nutrition misinformation. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 106(4), 601-607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2006.02.019
Watkins, L., Aitken, R., & Mather, D. (2016). Conscientious consumers: A relationship between moral foundations, political orientation and sustainable consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 134, 137-146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.009
Weitz-Shapiro, R., & Winters, M. S. (2017). Can citizens discern? Information credibility, political sophistication, and the punishment of corruption in Brazil. Journal of Politics, 79(1), 60-74. https://doi.org/10.1086/687287
Welbers, K., van Atteveldt, W., Kleinnijenhuis, J., Ruigrok, N., & Schaper, J. (2016). News selection criteria in the digital age: Professional norms versus online audience metrics. Journalism, 17(8), 1037-1053. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884915595474
Wertgen, A. G., Richter, T., & Rouet, J.-F. (2021). The role of source credibility in the validation of information depends on the degree of (im-)plausibility. Discourse Processes, 58(5-6), 513-528. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2021.1881342
Westerman, D. K., Spence, P. R., & Van Der Heide, B. (2014). Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(2), 171-183. https://doi.org/10.1111/JCC4.12041
Wihbey, J., Joseph, K., & Lazer, D. (2019) The social silos of journalism? Twitter, news media and partisan segregation. New Media & Society, 21(4), 815-835. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818807133
Wong, R. S. C. (2022). Revisiting cancel culture. Contexts, 21(4), 69-73. https://doi.org/10.1177/15365042221131087
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence. Political Behavior, 41, 135-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-018-9443-y
Wood, A. K., & Ravel, A. M. (2018). Fool me once: Regulating ‘fake news’ and other online advertising. Southern California Law Review, 91(6), 1223-1278.
Wu, I.-H., Liang, C., & Ip, C. Y. (2022). Involvement theory with market segmentation: Effect of false functional food advertising on purchase intention. Foods, 11(3), 978. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11070
Wu, P. C., & Wang, Y. C. (2011). The influences of electronic word-of-mouth message appeal and message source credibility on brand attitude. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 448-472. http://doi.org/10.1108/13555851111165020
Xiao, H.-C., Liang, C., Yen, J.-H., & Sun, Y. (2021). Exploring fact-checking behavior: A case study on food safety message. Journal of Educational Media & Library Sciences, 58(1), 87-122. https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.202103_58(1).0055.RS.BM
Yang, Q., Qureshi, K., & Zaman, T. (2020). Mitigating the backfire effect using pacing and leading. In: Complex Networks & Their Applications X. 1016, 156-165. New York, NY: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93413-2_14
Yates, L. S. (2011). Critical consumption: Boycotting and buycotting in Europe. European Societies, 13(2), 191-217. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2010.514352
Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Revision and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59-70.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97873-
dc.description.abstract中華民國(臺灣)於2021年開放含萊克多巴胺(Ractopamine)的美國豬肉進口,在野黨為求抗爭,透過社群媒體播送經剪輯重製國外研究單位拍攝的影音資訊,試圖發動民眾抵制。雖經影片原拍攝者澄清遭剪輯的影片內容為不實資訊,但已引發部分國人恐慌,不僅產生迴聲室現象及逆火效應,更讓豬肉消費在臺灣形成政治消費行為。加以臺灣因地緣政治的關係,近年持續遭受不實資訊的認知作戰,因此觸發了研究者深入探討此議題的動機。
本系列研究歷時三年,以資訊傳播觀點出發,分別以量化和質性研究方法,深度探究國內消費者在實體世界裡的政治消費行為與相關研究,共完成四項研究。研究一透過兩支萊豬影片,檢定消費者之政治傾向、計劃行為、資訊呈現方式、資訊來源可信度,以及消費意願間的因果關係,同時探究對其豬肉消費意願之影響。研究二依循紮根理論進行半結構式深度晤談法,探討農產品政治消費的資訊傳播行為。研究三分析不同政治傾向和性別之民眾的逆火效應,來檢定計劃行為、資訊呈現方式、迴聲室等變項對逆火效應的影響。研究四則是對施測對象進行職業區別,以釐清臺灣媒體從業人員與一般大眾對農業不實資訊防治方式的異同。
本系列研究實證了政治消費的日常化,同時發現迴聲室會大幅催生逆火效應,重視動物福利的態度則會抑制逆火效應,建立起以迴聲室為中介變項,來預測逆火效應的結構模型。另更進一步指出,透過結構與認知干預並行的兩種防治方式,可減輕不實資訊的傳播和危害,建構出以態度及資訊呈現方式為中介之不實資訊防治方式的預測模型,並依據研究結果,針對一般民眾、媒體從業人員,以及政府機構,提出研究者的實務建議。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn 2021, the Republic of China (Taiwan) permitted imports of American pork containing ractopamine. In protest, the opposition party disseminated a manipulated video—originally produced by a foreign research institution—on social media in an attempt to mobilize public resistance. Although the original producer clarified that the altered video constituted disinformation, it nevertheless provoked public anxiety in Taiwan. This incident not only reinforced echo chamber dynamics and triggered the backfire effect but also transformed pork consumption into an act of political expression. Additionally, Taiwan’s geographical context has rendered it particularly vulnerable to disinformation-based cognitive warfare in recent years, prompting researchers to investigate this phenomenon in depth.
This 3-year research project adopted an information dissemination perspective and employed both quantitative and qualitative methodologies to investigate political consumption behaviors among Taiwanese consumers. The project comprised four studies. Study 1 used two videos related to ractopamine-containing pork to examine the causal relationships between consumers’ political orientations, behavioral planning, information presentation, source credibility, and pork consumption intentions. Study 2 employed grounded theory and conducted semistructured in-depth interviews to explore the dissemination of political information related to agricultural products. Study 3 analyzed the backfire effect across political affiliations and genders to examine the impact of behavioral planning, information presentation methods, and echo chamber exposure on the backfire effect. Study 4 classified participants by occupation to compare how Taiwanese media professionals and the general public approach the prevention and management of agricultural disinformation.
Collectively, these studies empirically demonstrate the normalization of political consumption in daily life and reveal that echo chambers significantly intensify the backfire effect, whereas attitudes centered on animal welfare can mitigate it. A structural model was developed with the echo chamber as the mediating variable to predict the backfire effect. Furthermore, the study identified two effective strategies—structural and cognitive interventions—for curbing the spread and impact of disinformation. A predictive model incorporating attitudes and information presentation as mediating variables was constructed to guide disinformation prevention. Based on these findings, the researchers proposed practical recommendations for the general public, media professionals, and government agencies.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-07-21T16:05:21Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-07-21T16:05:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents目次
口試委員審定書---ⅰ
誌謝--- ⅱ
中文摘要--- ⅲ
英文摘要--- ⅳ
目次--- ⅴi
第一章 緒論--- 1
第一節 研究背景---- 1
第二節 研究動機---- 5
第三節 研究系列概述--- 9
第四節 研究目的--- 11
第五節 研究流程--- 13
第六節 名詞釋義--- 16
第七節 潛在貢獻--- 19
第二章 文獻探討---- 20
第一節 政治消費與消費意願--- 20
第二節 認知作戰、不實資訊與因應對策--- 23
第三節 網路回應、逆火效應與迴聲室效應--- 29
第四節 新聞工作者特質與不實資訊防治--- 32
第五節 資訊來源可信度與消費意願--- 35
第六節 涉入度、資訊來源可信度與消費意願--- 39
第七節 政治立場、資訊來源可信度、消費意願與不實訊息防治--- 44
第八節 計劃行為與不實訊息防治--- 50
第九節 計劃行為、迴聲室與逆火效應--- 53
第十節 資訊呈現方式、資訊來源可信度、消費意願、不實資訊防治、迴聲室與逆火效應-55
第三章 研究方法--- 62
第一節 系列研究說明--- 62
第二節 研究一和研究二成果簡介--- 67
第三節 研究三研究方法--- 72
第四節 研究四研究方法--- 83
第四章 研究三成果與討論--- 94
第一節 研究發現--- 94
第二節 研究結果討論--- 106
第三節 研究限制與未來研究--- 108
第五章 研究四成果與討論--- 109
第一節 研究發現--- 109
第二節 研究結果討論--- 122
第三節 研究限制與未來研究--- 125
第六章 研究結論與實務建議--- 127
第一節 研究三結論與研究貢獻--- 127
第二節 研究四結論與研究貢獻--- 128
第三節 系列研究的實務建議--- 130
中文參考文獻書目--- 136
英文參考文獻書目--- 139

附錄一:研究一全文--- 165
附錄二:研究二全文--- 190
附錄三:研究三量表--- 205
附錄四:研究四量表--- 208
學術履歷:論文發表--- 211
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject逆火效應zh_TW
dc.subject資訊呈現方式zh_TW
dc.subject進口美豬zh_TW
dc.subject計劃行為zh_TW
dc.subject政治傾向zh_TW
dc.subject政治消費zh_TW
dc.subject迴聲室zh_TW
dc.subject逆火效應zh_TW
dc.subject不實資訊防治zh_TW
dc.subject資訊呈現方式zh_TW
dc.subject進口美豬zh_TW
dc.subject計劃行為zh_TW
dc.subject政治傾向zh_TW
dc.subject政治消費zh_TW
dc.subject迴聲室zh_TW
dc.subject不實資訊防治zh_TW
dc.subjectinformation presentationen
dc.subjectprevention of disinformationen
dc.subjectbackfire effecten
dc.subjectecho chamberen
dc.subjectpolitical consumptionen
dc.subjectpolitical orientationen
dc.subjectplanned behavioren
dc.subjectimported U.S. porken
dc.subjectinformation presentationen
dc.subjectprevention of disinformationen
dc.subjectbackfire effecten
dc.subjectecho chamberen
dc.subjectpolitical consumptionen
dc.subjectpolitical orientationen
dc.subjectplanned behavioren
dc.subjectimported U.S. porken
dc.title從臺灣進口美豬探究不實資訊的政治消費、 逆火效應與防治策略zh_TW
dc.titleEnquiring the political consumption, backfire effect and prevention strategies of disinformation regarding Taiwan’s import of US Porken
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-2-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee胡博硯;陳明通;曾建元;黃之暘;賴政豪zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteePo-Yen Hu;Ming-Tong Chen;Chien-Yuan Tseng;Chih-Yang Huang;Cheng-Hao Laien
dc.subject.keyword不實資訊防治,逆火效應,迴聲室,政治消費,政治傾向,計劃行為,進口美豬,資訊呈現方式,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordprevention of disinformation,backfire effect,echo chamber,political consumption,political orientation,planned behavior,imported U.S. pork,information presentation,en
dc.relation.page211-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202501594-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2025-07-16-
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept生物產業傳播暨發展學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2025-07-22-
顯示於系所單位:生物產業傳播暨發展學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-2.pdf9.76 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved