請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9713完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 雷庚玲(Ken-Lin Lay) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Le_Chi Hsiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 項樂琦 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:37:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:37:04Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2008-07-30 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2008 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2008-07-29 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王素華、蔡文吟、雷庚玲（1996）。老師負向言語內容及引發事由分佈之初探。中國心理學會年會：南港，台北。
吉力根（Gilligan, C., 1982/2002）。「不同的語音 : 心理學理論與女性的發展」（In a different voice : psychological theory and women's development，王雅各譯）。台北市 : 心理。 希拉芯（Clinton, H. R., 2003）。「活出歷史 : 希拉蕊回憶錄」（Living History，鍾玉玨等譯）。台北市 : 時報文化。 李美枝（1981）。性別特質問卷的編製及男女大學生四種性別特質類型在成就動機，婚姻、事業及性態度上的比較。「中華心理學刊」，23，23-37。 李美枝、鍾秋玉（1996）。性別與性別角色析論。「本土心理學研究」，6，260-299。 周育瑩、陳皎眉（2005）。刻板印象威脅對於女性領導表現之影響。臺灣心理學會第四十四屆年會。 周育瑩（2004）。刻板印象威脅對於女性領導表現之影響。（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立政治大學心理學研究所。 林淑美（1993）。比較高中男女合班,男女分班合校和男女分校對學生心理成長上的影響。「輔導月刊」，29，34-42。 邱蜀娟（2004）。性別刻板印象與自我設限。（未發表之碩士論文）。台北：國立政治大學心理學研究所。 教育部統計處統計資料（2008）。教育部統計處網（http://140.111.34.54/statistics/index.aspx）。 陳皎眉、周育瑩（2005）。「刻板印象威脅」及其在教育與輔導上之應用。「輔導季刊」，41，39-49。 陳皎眉、孫旻暐（2006）。從性別刻板印象威脅談學業表現上的性別差異。「教育研究月刊」，147，19-30。 陳誠中（1975）。高中應否男女合校。「師友」，99，17。 張歆祐、郭麗安（2000）。高中生對男女合班之認知與態度研究。「測驗與輔導」，163，3421-3424。 黃藿（2005）。男女分校與合校的爭議。「教育研究」，129，141-142。 楊國樞（1981）。中國人的性格與行為：形成及蛻變。「中華心理學刊」，23，39-55。 謝臥龍、駱慧文（1997）。國中科學教育教學方法與課堂互動中之性別差異。「性別與科學教育」學術研討會：台北。 謝臥龍、駱慧文、吳雅玲（1999）。從性別平等的教育觀點來探討高雄地區國小課堂中師生互動的關係。「教育研究資訊」，7，57-80。 薩克斯 (Sax, L., 2006)。「養男育女調不同」（Why Gender Matters: What Parents and Teachers Need to Know about the Emerging Science of Sex Differences，洪蘭譯）。台北市：遠流。 Ambady, N., Shih, M., Kim, A., & Pittinsky, T. L. (2001). Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 12, 385-390. Antill, J. T. (1983). Sex role complementary versus similarity in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 145-155. Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 113-125. Aronson, J., Lustina, M. J., Good, C., Keough, K., Steele, C. M., & Brown, J. (1999). When White men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 29-46. Basow, S. A. (2006). Gender role and gender identity development. In J. Worell & C. D. good-heart (Eds.), New York: Oxford University Press. Bassoff, E. S., & Glass, G. V. (1982). The relationship between sex roles and mental health: A meta-analysis of twenty-six studies. Counseling Psychologist, 10, 105-112. Bem, S. L. (1974). The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 155-162. Bem, S. L. (1977). On the utility of alternative procedures for assessing psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 45, 196-205. Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354-364. Bem, S. L. (1984). Androgyny and gender schema theory: A conceptual and empirical integration. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 179-226. Bem, S. L., & Lewis, S. A. (1975). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634-643. Bem, S. L., Martyna, W., & Watson, C. (1976). Sex typing and androgyny: Further explorations of the expressive domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 1016-1023. Betz, N. E., & Hackett, G. (1981). The relationship of career-related self-efficacy expectations to perceived career options in college women and men. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 28, 399-410. Boswell, S. J. (1985). The influence of sex-role stereotyping on women's attitudes and achievement in mathematics. In S. F. Chipman, L. R. Brush, & D. M. Wilson (Eds.), Women and mathematics: Balancing the equation. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Brown, R. P., & Pinel, E. C. (2003). Stigma on my mind: Individual differences in the experience of stereotype threat. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 626-633. Cahill, L. (2005). His Brain. Scientific American, 5, 22-29. Cheryan, S., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2000). When positive stereotypes threaten intellectual performance: The psychological hazards of 'model minority' status. Psychological Science, 11, 399-402. Comstock, G., & Scharrer, E. (2006). Media and popular culture. In W. Damon & R. Lerner (Eds.), NY: Wiley. DeZolt, D. M., & Hull, S. H. (2001). Classroom and school climate. In J. Worell (Ed.), San Diego: Academic Press. Eccles, J. S. (1984). Sex differences in achievement patterns. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 32, 97-132. Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585-609. Edwards, S. R. (2002). Gender-based and mixed-sex classrooms: The relationship of mathematics anxiety, achievement, and classroom performance in female high school math students. Edwards, Sandra Richards: Georgia State U , US. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York: W. W. Norton and Company. Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity: Youth and crisis. New York: W. W. Norton and Company. Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York: W. W. Norton. Foundation, N. S. (2000). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2000 (NSF Publication No.00-327). Arlington, VA: Author. Frost, J., & McKelvie, S. (2004). Self-esteem and body satisfaction in male and female elementary school, high school, and university students. Sex Roles, 51, 45-54. Gallagher, A., Bridgeman, B., & Cahalan, C. (2000). The effect of computer-based tess on racial/ethnic, gender, and language groups, NJ: Educational Testing Service. Gillis, M. B. (2008). Gender-based education: The pilot year of single-gender classes at a public elementary school. Gillis, Myra Bryant: Mississippi State U., US. Goh, S. C., & Mealiea, L. W. (1984). Fear of success and its relationship to the job performance, tenure, and desired job outcomes of women. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science�Revue canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 16, 65-75. Good, C., Aronson, J., & Inzlicht, M. (2003). Improving adolescents' standardized test performance: An intervention to reduce the effects of stereotype threat. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 645-662. Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbache, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1-51. Hill, J. P., & Lynch, M. E. (1983). The intensification of gender-related role expectations during early adolescence. In J. Brooks-Gunn & A. C. Petersen (Eds.), Girls at puberty: Biological and psychological perspectives, New York: Plenum. Horner, M. S. (1972). Toward an understanding of achievement-related conflicts in women. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 157-175. Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., Ryan, M., Frost, L. A., & Hopp, C. (1990). Gender comparisons of mathematics attitudes and affect: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 299-324. Jacobs, J. E., Lanza, S., Osgood, D., Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Changes in children’s self-competence and values: Gender and domain differences across grades on though twelve. Child Development, 73, 509-527. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing Is Half the Battle: Teaching Stereotype Threat as a Means of Improving Women's Math Performance. Psychological Science, 16, 175-179. Kaminski, D., & Sheridan, E. (1984). Children's perceptions of sex stereotyping: A five-year study. International Journal of Women's Studies, 7, 24-36. Keller, J. (2002). Blatant stereotype threat and women's math performance: Self-handicapping as a strategic means to cope with obtrusive negative performance expectations. Sex Roles, 47, 193-198. Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disruptiing threat effect on women's math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 371-381. Krupnick, C. G. (1985). Women and men in the classroom: Inequality and its remedies. On Teaching and Learning, 10, 18-25. Kurdek, L. A., & Schmitt, J. (1986). Interaction of sex role self-concept with relationship quality and relationship beliefs in married, heterosexual cohabiting, gay, and lesbian couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 365-370. Leaper, C., & Friedman, C. K. (2007). The socialization of gender. In J. E. Grusec & P.D. Hastings (Eds.), NY: Guilford Press. Lee, P.-C., Wu, C.-S., & Lay, K.-L. (2005, April). Praising ability is not worse but even better than praising effort: Two replications of Mueller & Dweck (1998) on Chinese children. In Keng-Ling Lay (Chair), Reconsidering the Effects of Entity and Incremental Feedbacks in Academic Situations: Findings From a Chinese Population. Symposium conducted at the Biennial Convention of the Society for Research in Child Development, Atlanta, GA, USA. Levy, B. (1996). Improving memory in old age through implicit self-stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1092-1107. Lynch, M. E. (1991). Gender intensification. In R. M. Lerner, A. C. Petersen, & J. Brooks-Gunn (Eds.), Encyclopedia of adolescence (Vol. 1). New York: Garland. Maccoby, E. E. (2007). Historical overview of socialization research and theory. In J. E. Grusec & P.D.Hastings (Eds.), NY: Guilford Press. Marx, D. M., & Roman, J. S. (2002). Female role models: Protecting women's math test performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1183-1193. Matlin, M. W. (1993). The psychology of women (2nd ed.), San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. O'Heron, C. A., & Orlofsky, J. L. (1990). Stereotypic and Nonstereotypic Sex Role Trait and Behavior Orientations, Gender Identity, and Psychological Adjustment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 134-143. Oswald, D. L., & Harvey, R. D. (2003). A Q-methodological study of women's subjective perspectives on mathematics. Sex Roles, 49, 133-142. Peng, T. K. (2006). Construct Validation of the Bem Sex Role Inventory in Taiwan. Sex Roles, 55, 843-851. Pinel, E. C. (1999). Stigma consciousness: The psychological legacy of social stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 114-128. Powlishta, K. K. (1995). Intergroup processes in childhood: Social categorization and sex role development. Developmental Psychology, 31, 781-788. Rienks, S. L. (2008). Does gender composition of the classroom matter? A comparison of students' academic and social outcomes in single-gender and coed high school classrooms. Rienks, Shauna L : U. Denver, US. Robins, R. W., Trzesniewski, K. H., Tracey, J. L., Potter, J., & Goslng, S. D. (2002). Age differences in self-esteem from age 9-90. Psychology and aging, 17, 423-434. Rosner, B. A., & Rierdan, J. (1994). Adolescent girls' self-esteem: Variations in developmental trajectories. Paper presented at the meeting of the Society for Research on Adolescence, San Diego. Schmader, T. (2002). Gender identification moderates stereotype threat effects on women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 194-201. Schmader, T., & Johns, M. (2003). Converging Evidence That Stereotype Threat Reduces Working Memory Capacity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 440-452. Shih, M., Pittinsky, T. L., & Ambady, N. (1999). Stereotype susceptibility: Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance. Psychological Science, 10, 80-83. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women's math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 4-28. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-629. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811. Suen, M.-W., & Crisp, R.J. (2005). Stereotype Threat Effects: Target of Comparison on Actual Math Performance. Poster presented at 52nd SPSP Annual Meeting, in Palm Springs, U.S.A. (26-28 January, 2006) Taylor, M. C., & Hall, J. A. (1982). Psychological androgyny: Theories, methods, and conclusions. Psychological Bulletin, 92, 347-366. Wang, S.-h. & Lay, K.-L. (1999, April). The effect of the normative information accompanied with teacher's comments. In Keng-Ling Lay (Chair), Reconsideration of the Effects of Teachers' and Parents' Verbal Comments and Disciplines: Findings from a Chinese Population. Symposium conducted at the Biennial Convention of the Society for Research in Child Development, Albuquerque, NM, USA. Wigfield, A., wagner, A. L. (2005). Competence, Motivation, and Identity Development during Adolescence. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: The Guilford press. Williams, J. E., & Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study (rev. ed.), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc. Winchel, R., Fenner, D., & Shaver, P. (1974). Impact of coeducation on 'fear of success' imagery expressed by male and female high school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 726-730. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9713 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 國內目前的中學教育制度基於性別平等和人格健全發展的理由，已大多由過去的男女分班制改變成男女合班。Spencer、Steele和Quinn（1999）發現，有男生在場和給予「女生數學比男生差」之性別刻板印象威脅訊息，會使女生的數學測驗表現比男生差，給予「男女生數學一樣好」之去威脅訊息則使男女表現一樣好。本研究欲了解臺灣青少女之邏輯分析（數理方面之共同基本能力）表現及信心是否同樣會受到性別刻板印象威脅訊息的影響，並檢驗女生的男性化特質高低是否對威脅訊息有不同程度的反應。本研究並探討「男女生的數理能力其實旗鼓相當、各有優勢」之去威脅訊息是否對女生的邏輯分析測驗表現與信心具鼓勵作用。同時也試圖了解大學和高中之不同發展階段、以及鎮日浸淫於不同情境的男女合校及女校的高中女生，所受的影響是否有差異。
共有241位大學女生（有男生在場116位、沒有男生在場125位）與270位高中女生（男女合班144位、女校126位）以閱讀測驗進行訊息操弄，隨機分成三組，分別為：「女生數理能力較男生差」（性別威脅訊息組）、不涉及性別刻板印象（無訊息組）、以及「男女生數理能力各有不同的優勢」（去威脅訊息組）。並以李美枝（1981）編製的中文版性別特質量表進行男性化特質高低分組。以有�無男生在場情境（2）× 訊息操弄（3）× 男性化特質高低（2）進行三因子共變數分析，發現「沒有男生在場」對大學女生會造成負面影響，「有男生在場」情境則會對高中女生產生負面影響。「性別威脅訊息」會使沒有男生在場的大學女生和低男性化特質的高中女生認為測驗難度較高。「去威脅訊息」並未出現預期的輔助效果，甚至對低男性化特質的高中、大學女生和有男生在場的高中女生都造成負向影響。本研究顯示有�無男生在場和性別刻板印象威脅訊息的確會對女生之表現造成影響，但對高中女生及大學女生的影響不盡相同，而高男性化特質的高中、大學女生的確較不易因情境和威脅的干擾而影響其對測驗的信心。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The secondary school educational environment in Taiwan has changed from single-sex to co-educational nowadays according to the reason of sex equality and the welfare of personality development. Spencer, Steele & Quinn (1999) found that giving female subjects the message of “Women perform more poorly than men on the math test” with male presence would worsen their math performance, while the “Women and men perform equally well on the math test” message makes them perform as well as men do. The present study intends to understand if local adolescent girls’ performance and confidence on analytical performance (the general mental ability of math and scientific knowledge) will also be affected by the gender stereotype threat (GST), if they react differently due to their masculine traits level, and if the message of “Women and men have distinctive superior math abilities” can increase adolescent girls’ performance and confidence. This study, meanwhile, also tries to know if different developmental stages such as university and high school students and the coeducation and single-sex educational environment would cause women react differently to GST.
241 female college students (116 with male presence, and 125 without male presence) and 270 female senior high school students (114 from coeducational school, and 126 from single-sex school) were randomly allocated to one of three reading tests conditions (increasing GST [Women perform more poorly than men on the math test] vs. without GST [the absence of message about sex] vs. reducing GST [Women and men perform equally well on the math test]) and separated into high/low masculine traits groups by the Chinese version of BSRI (Lee, 1981). The three factors ANCOVA on the with/without male presence condition(2) × messages (3) × high/low masculine traits groups (2) finds that “without male” presence will do harm to female college students while “with male presence” will worsen senior high females’ performance. The “Increasing GST”message makes female college students with male presence and female high school students with low masculine traits consider the test to be harder. The “reducing GST”message surprisingly does not benefit them but causes negative effects to college and high school students with low masculine traits and high school students with male presence. On the whole, this study supports the hypothesis that with/without male presence and GST messages do affect adolescent girls, college and senior high school students are affected in different ways, and female college and high school students with high masculine traits are least affected by GST. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:37:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-97-R93227121-1.pdf: 742073 bytes, checksum: 163809768e83fdb1b9e6d20e553d4c3a (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書………………………………………………………………………i
誌謝………………………………………………………………………………………iii 中文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………v 英文摘要…………………………………………………………………………………vii 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 有無異性學習情境對學習活動之影響…………………………………2 第二節 「男性數理能力比女性好」之性別刻板印象威脅對女生的影響……4 第三節 性別特質與性別刻板印象威脅…………………………………………10 第四節 性別刻板印象威脅效果的發展性差異…………………………………12 第五節 研究目的與假設…………………………………………………………13 第二章 實驗一：大學施測……………………………………………………………17 第一節 方法………………………………………………………………………17 第二節 結果………………………………………………………………………21 第三節 討論………………………………………………………………………27 第三章 實驗二：高中施測……………………………………………………………29 第一節 方法………………………………………………………………………30 第二節 結果………………………………………………………………………32 第三節 討論………………………………………………………………………37 第四章 綜合討論………………………………………………………………………41 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………53 附錄………………………………………………………………………………………61 附錄一 能力本質與努力本質之影響……………………………………………61 附錄二 大學受試者間設計與受試者內設計結果比較…………………………66 附錄三 邀請受試者參與再測研究信函…………………………………………72 附錄四 測驗表現之性別比較……………………………………………………74 附錄五 大學初試指導語…………………………………………………………77 附錄六 大學複試指導語…………………………………………………………78 附錄七 初試邏輯分析測驗………………………………………………………80 附錄八 初試測驗評估……………………………………………………………83 附錄九 複試閱讀測驗……………………………………………………………84 附錄十 複試邏輯分析測驗………………………………………………………92 附錄十一 複試個人特質量表……………………………………………………97 附錄十二 複試測驗評估…………………………………………………………99 附錄十三 高中致實驗學校說明…………………………………………………100 附錄十四 高中施測指導語………………………………………………………102 附錄十五 高中甲校（男女合班）測驗評估……………………………………103 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 刻板印象威脅下的青少女：男性化特質對邏輯分析表現與信心的效果 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Adolescent girls under stereotype threat: The effect of masculine traits on analytical performance and confidence | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 96-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李美枝(Mei-Zhi Lee),陳皎眉(Jiao-Mei Chen) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 刻板印象威脅,性別刻板印象,數學,工具性特質,男性化特質,男女分班, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | stereotype threat,gender stereotype,math,instrumental traits,masculine traits,single-sex education, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 103 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2008-07-29 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-97-1.pdf | 724.68 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。