Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97084
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor簡睿哲zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorRuey-Jer Jeanen
dc.contributor.author鄭晴文zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChing-Wen Chengen
dc.date.accessioned2025-02-26T16:22:30Z-
dc.date.available2025-02-27-
dc.date.copyright2025-02-26-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-09-06-
dc.identifier.citation(一)英文部分
Awa, H. O., Ojiabo, O. U., & Orokor, L. E. (2017). Integrated technology-organization-environment (TOE) taxonomies for technology adoption. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 30(6), 893-921.
Baker, J. (2012). The technology–organization–environment framework. Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 1, 231-245.
Bansal, P., Smith, W. K., & Vaara, E. (2018). New ways of seeing through qualitative research. Academy of management journal, 61(4), 1189-1195.
Baumgartner, R. J. (2014). Managing corporate sustainability and CSR: A conceptual framework combining values, strategies and instruments contributing to sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(5), 258-271.
Bose, R., & Luo, X. (2011). Integrative framework for assessing firms’ potential to undertake Green IT initiatives via virtualization–A theoretical perspective. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 20(1), 38-54.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future—Call for action. Environmental conservation, 14(4), 291-294.
Chen, A. J., Boudreau, M. C., & Watson, R. T. (2008). Information systems and ecological sustainability. Journal of systems and Information technology, 10(3), 186-201.
Chen, A. J., Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M. C., & Karahanna, E. (2011). An institutional perspective on the adoption of Green IS & IT. Australasian Journal of Information Systems, 17(1).
Corbett, J. (2013). Designing and using carbon management systems to promote ecologically responsible behaviors. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(7), 2.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Technology acceptance model: TAM. Al-Suqri, MN, Al-Aufi, AS: Information Seeking Behavior and Technology Adoption, 205, 219.
DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147-160.
Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business strategy and the environment, 11(2), 130-141.
Gholami, R., Watson, R. T., Hasan, H., Molla, A., & Bjorn-Andersen, N. (2016). Information systems solutions for environmental sustainability: How can we do more?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(8), 2.
Gutierrez, A., Boukrami, E., & Lumsden, R. (2015). Technological, organisational and environmental factors influencing managers’ decision to adopt cloud computing in the UK. Journal of enterprise information management, 28(6), 788-807.
Hanelt, A., Busse, S., & Kolbe, L. M. (2017). Driving business transformation toward sustainability: exploring the impact of supporting IS on the performance contribution of eco‐innovations. Information Systems Journal, 27(4), 463-502.
Hilty, L. M., & Aebischer, B. (2015). ICT for sustainability: An emerging research field. ICT innovations for Sustainability, 3-36.
Junge, A. L., & Straube, F. (2020). Sustainable supply chains–digital transformation technologies’ impact on the social and environmental dimension. Procedia Manufacturing, 43, 736-742.
King, N., Brooks, J., & Horrocks, C. (2018). Interviews in qualitative research.
Kouhizadeh, M., Saberi, S., & Sarkis, J. (2021). Blockchain technology and the sustainable supply chain: Theoretically exploring adoption barriers. International journal of production economics, 231, 107831.
Liang, H., Saraf, N., Hu, Q., & Xue, Y. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: the effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS quarterly, 59-87.
Lin, C. Y., & Ho, Y. H. (2011). Determinants of green practice adoption for logistics companies in China. Journal of business ethics, 98, 67-83.
Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect intention to use an online learning community. Computers & education, 54(2), 600-610.
Loeser, F. (2013). Green IT and Green IS: Definition of constructs and overview of current practices.
Longhurst, R. (2003). Semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Key methods in geography, 3(2), 143-156.
Low, C., Chen, Y., & Wu, M. (2011). Understanding the determinants of cloud computing adoption. Industrial management & data systems, 111(7), 1006-1023.
May, T., & Perry, B. (2022). Social research: Issues, methods and process. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
Melville, N. P. (2010). Information systems innovation for environmental sustainability. MIS quarterly, 1-21.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.
Morioka, S. N., Bolis, I., & De Carvalho, M. M. (2018). From an ideal dream towards reality analysis: Proposing Sustainable Value Exchange Matrix (SVEM) from systematic literature review on sustainable business models and face validation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 178, 76-88.
Muchran, M., & Ahmar, A. S. (2019). Application of TAM model to the use of information technology. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.11358.
Munoz-Leiva, F., Climent-Climent, S., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2017). Determinants of intention to use the mobile banking apps: An extension of the classic TAM model. Spanish journal of marketing-ESIC, 21(1), 25-38.
Oliveira, T., & Martins, M. F. (2011). Literature review of information technology adoption models at firm level. Electronic journal of information systems evaluation, 14(1), pp110-121.
Oliveira, T., Thomas, M., & Espadanal, M. (2014). Assessing the determinants of cloud computing adoption: An analysis of the manufacturing and services sectors. Information & management, 51(5), 497-510.
Rauniar, R., Rawski, G., Yang, J., & Johnson, B. (2014). Technology acceptance model (TAM) and social media usage: an empirical study on Facebook. Journal of enterprise information management, 27(1), 6-30.
Rogers, E. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (Fourth Paperback ed.).
Sacco, P., Gargano, E. R., & Cornella, A. (2021, September). Sustainable digitalization: A systematic literature review to identify how to make digitalization more sustainable. In International TRIZ Future Conference (pp. 14-29). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
Sarkis, J., Kouhizadeh, M., & Zhu, Q. S. (2021). Digitalization and the greening of supply chains. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 121(1), 65-85.
Stead, J. G., & Stead, W. E. (2008). Sustainable strategic management: an evolutionary perspective. International Journal of Sustainable Strategic Management, 1(1), 62-81.
Sun, S., Cegielski, C. G., Jia, L., & Hall, D. J. (2018). Understanding the factors affecting the organizational adoption of big data. Journal of computer information systems, 58(3), 193-203.
Székely, F., & Knirsch, M. (2005). Responsible leadership and corporate social responsibility:: Metrics for sustainable performance. European Management Journal, 23(6), 628-647.
Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350.
Teo, H. H., Wei, K. K., & Benbasat, I. (2003). Predicting intention to adopt interorganizational linkages: An institutional perspective. MIS quarterly, 19-49.
Thong, J. Y. (1999). An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. Journal of management information systems, 15(4), 187-214.
Tornatzky, L. G., Fleischer, M., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1990). The processes of technological innovation. (No Title).
Van Marrewijk, M. (2003). Concepts and definitions of CSR and corporate sustainability: Between agency and communion. Journal of business ethics, 44(2), 95-105.
Watson, R. T., Boudreau, M. C., & Chen, A. J. (2010). Information systems and environmentally sustainable development: energy informatics and new directions for the IS community. MIS quarterly, 23-38.
Yadav, S., & Singh, S. P. (2020). Blockchain critical success factors for sustainable supply chain. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 152, 104505.
Yin, W. (2023). Does digital transformation matter to green innovation: based on TOE framework and configuration perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(44), 100046-100057.
Zhu, K., Dong, S., Xu, S. X., & Kraemer, K. L. (2006). Innovation diffusion in global contexts: determinants of post-adoption digital transformation of European companies. European journal of information systems, 15, 601-616.
(二)中文部分
林金定、嚴嘉楓、陳美花(2005)。質性研究方法:訪談模式與實施步驟分析。身心障礙研究季刊,3(2),122-136。https://doi.org/10.30072/JDR.200506.0005
TrendForce:中、美加強晶片自主,預估2027年台灣晶圓代工產能占比將收斂至41%. (2023, December 14). Trendforce. https://www.trendforce.com.tw/presscenter/news/20231214-11958.html
倪上筑(Ed.). (2020, August 3). 【永續領袖願景】台達永續長周志宏:企業永續要做「實」不做「虛」. CSRone. https://csrone.com/topics/6294
王薪棉. (2023. 台灣電子產業鏈概況. 財團法人台北外匯市場發展基金會. https://www.tpefx.com.tw/uploads/download/tw/V8.pdf#page=14.09
經濟部. (2024). 進出口貿易量. 行政院國情簡介. https://www.ey.gov.tw/state/6A206590076F7EF/8b5032af-1a67-4c02-bd16-8791aa459cd2
Delta. (2023, June 28). 減碳也能數位化?就靠永續管理平台. Delta. https://www.deltaww.com/zh-tw/Podcast/EP19-%E6%B8%9B%E7%A2%B3%E4%B9%9F%E8%83%BD%E6%95%B8%E4%BD%8D%E5%8C%96-%E5%B0%B1%E9%9D%A0%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86%E5%B9%B3%E5%8F%B0
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/97084-
dc.description.abstract國際永續意識持續升溫,今日企業在層層壓力下,必須正視永續議題管理,永續議題囊括自身營運、產品生產到供應商管理,涵蓋的面向廣,企業需要蒐集的資訊量大且複雜,此外,歐盟的碳關稅政策,對於以出口為導向的國內電子產業更是一大衝擊,產業內企業著手進行供應鏈碳管理,大公司紛紛開始自建或導入永續數位管理平台和系統來提升其在永續管理方面的效率和效果,考量永續數位工具仍在成長階段,對企業導入之現象也尚無一理論分析說明,因此,值得深入探討企業選擇採用永續管理平台之關鍵因素。
故本研究旨在探討數位賦能之企業永續管理,透過與企業永續部門人員、數位管理系統提供商進行訪談和次級資料的蒐集,以科技-組織-環境(TOE)模型為分析架構,深入瞭解影響企業在採用永續數位管理工具時的關鍵因素和背景,透過跨個案分析,本研究也得知,在技術層面,考量相容性和資訊複雜度,大型企業選擇自行將碳管理等相關永續議題整合至原先的資訊管理系統;在組織層面,高階管理者的態度和跨部門協作的員工認知是工具導入流程中的關鍵因素;在環境層面,政府政策、供應商壓力、顧客要求和同業壓力為此工具之主要推動來源。總結而言,本研究透過訪談歸納出不同個案的影響因素,為未來企業在著手永續議題管理或政府輔佐企業推動時提供參考。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWith the increasing global awareness of sustainability, today's businesses face mounting pressure to address sustainability management issues. These issues encompass a wide range of aspects, including operations, product production process, and supplier management...etc. The amount and complexity of information that companies need to gather are substantial. Additionally, the European Union's CBAM policy poses a significant challenge to the domestic electronics industry, which relies on export. Companies within the industry start to engage in supply chain carbon management, and large corporations are increasingly building or adopting sustainable digital platforms and systems to enhance their efficiency and effectiveness in sustainability management.
Given that usage of sustainable digital tools are still growing and there is no theoretical analysis explaining the phenomenon of their adoption by companies. It is worthwhile to explore the key factors influencing companies' choices to adopt sustainable management platforms. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the digital empowerment of corporate sustainability management. Through interviews with personnel from corporate sustainability departments and digital management system providers, as well as the collection of secondary data, this study uses the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework as an analytical structure to deeply understand the key factors and contexts influencing companies' adoption of sustainable digital management tools.
Through cross-case analysis, this study finds that, on the technology aspect, considering compatibility and information complexity, large companies choose to integrate carbon management and other related sustainability issues into their existing information management systems. On the organizational aspect, the attitudes of senior managers and the perceptions of employees involved in cross-departmental collaboration are critical factors in the tool adoption process. On the environmental aspect, supplier pressure and peer pressure are the main drivers for the adoption of these tools. In summary, this study synthesizes the influencing factors from different cases, providing a reference for future companies in sustainability issue management or government assistance in promoting corporate sustainability efforts.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-26T16:22:30Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2025-02-26T16:22:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 II
ABSTRACT III
目次 IV
圖次 V
表次 V
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究問題與目的 2
第三節 研究對象與流程 2
第二章、文獻回顧 4
第一節 企業永續發展 4
第二節 數位賦能永續管理 4
第三節 TOE模型 7
第三章 研究架構與方法 11
第一節 研究架構 11
第二節 研究方法 12
第四章 訪談內容分析 14
第一節 電子產業 14
第二節 受訪者背景 18
第三節 訪談內容分析 20
第五章 結論與建議 32
第一節 結論 32
第二節 研究意涵 33
第三節 研究限制與未來展望 34
參考文獻 35
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subjectTOE模型zh_TW
dc.subject供應商管理zh_TW
dc.subject碳管理平台zh_TW
dc.subject永續管理zh_TW
dc.subject企業永續zh_TW
dc.subjectsupply chain managementen
dc.subjectTOE modelen
dc.subjectCorporate Sustainabilityen
dc.subjectESGen
dc.subjectCarbon management systemen
dc.title以TOE架構探討數位賦能之企業永續管理,以台灣電子產業為例zh_TW
dc.titleExploring Digitally-Enabled Corporate Sustainability Management through the TOE Framework: A Case Study of the Electronics Industry in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear113-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee何筱文;林谷合zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeHsiao-Wen Ho;Ku-Ho Linen
dc.subject.keyword企業永續,永續管理,碳管理平台,TOE模型,供應商管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordCorporate Sustainability,ESG,Carbon management system,TOE model,supply chain management,en
dc.relation.page40-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202403547-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-09-06-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2029-09-02-
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-113-1.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.69 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved