請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96858完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 簡睿哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ruey-Jer Jean | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 吳昊騰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hao-Teng Wu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-24T16:17:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-25 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-24 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-11-06 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 臺北市動物保護處動物收容組.(2024, May 16).常見問答:我在動物之家認養的狗狗(貓咪)，帶回家後發現不適合或家人沒辦法接受牠，請問我可以把牠送回去嗎?.臺北市動物保護處.https://www.tcapo.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=10457D24D71EC09E&sms=87415A8B9CE81B16&s=A76D6EDE3FE61795
楊正海, & 邱書昱. (2023, October 13). 北市動物之家 去年退養率創新高. 聯合新聞網.https://udn.com/news/story/7470/7501674 Allport, F. H., & Allport, G. W. (1921). Personality Traits: Their Classification and Measurement. The Journal of Abnormal Psychology and Social Psychology, 16(1), 6-40.https://doi.org/10.1037/h0069790 Cattell, R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. World Book Company. Eysenck, S. B. G., & Eysenck, H. J. (1963). The validity of questionnaire and rating assessments of extraversion and neuroticism, and their factorial stability. British Journal of Psychology, 54(1), 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1963.tb00861.x Mowen, J. C., Park, S., & Zablah, A. (2007). Toward a theory of motivation and personality with application to word-of-mouth communications. Journal of Business Research, 60(6),590-596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.06.007 Ranaweera, C., Bansal, H., & McDougall, G. (2008). Web site satisfaction and purchase intentions: Impact of personality characteristics during initial web site visit.Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 18(4), 329-347. Li, D., & Yu, D. (2022). The impact of consumer positive personality on the purchase behavior of smart products. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. Flynn, L. R., Goldsmith, R. E., & Pollitte, W. (2016). Materialism, Status Consumption, and Market Involved Consumers. Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B., Jr. (2003). A very brief measure of the Big-Five personality domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504-528.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(03)00046-1 Van Ryzin, G. G. (2013). An experimental test of the expectancy-disconfirmation theory of citizen satisfaction. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(3), 597-614. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/pam.21702 Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351-370. Management Information Systems Research Center, University of Minnesota. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3250921 Elkhani, N., & Bakri, A. B. (2012). Review on “Expectancy Disconfirmation Theory” (EDT) model in B2C e-commerce. Journal of Research and Innovation in Information Systems. Retrieved from http://seminar.utmspace.edu.my/myaisprint/ Tse, D. K., & Wilton, P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172652 Serrano, C. I., Shah, V., & Abràmoff, M. D. (2018). Use of expectation disconfirmation theory to test patient satisfaction with asynchronous telemedicine for diabetic retinopathy detection. International Journal of Telemedicine and Applications. Wiley Online Library. Herwijnen, I. R., van der Borg, J. A. M., Naguib, M., & Beerda, B. (2018). Dog ownership satisfaction determinants in the owner-dog relationship and the dog's behaviour.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0200541 Weng, H.-Y., & Kass, P. H. (2006). Risk factors for unsuccessful dog ownership: An epidemiologic study in Taiwan. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 77(1-2), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.06.004 Amirhosseini, M. H., Yadav, V., Serpell, J. A., Pettigrew, P., & Kain, P. (2024). An artificial intelligence approach to predicting personality types in dogs. Scientific Reports. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-024-52920-9 Gartner, M. C. (2015). Pet personality: A review. Personality and Individual Differences, 75, 102-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.10.042 Serpell, J. A. (1996). Evidence for an association between pet behavior and owner attachment levels. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47(1-2), 49-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)01010-6 Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 480-486. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.62.4.480 Wilsson, E., & Sundgren, P.-E. (1997). The use of a behaviour test for the selection of dogs for service and breeding, I: Method of testing and evaluating test results in the adult dog, demands on different kinds of service dogs, sex and breed differences. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 53(4), 279–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(96)01174-4 Engel, J. F., Kollat, D. T., & Blackwell, R. D. (1969). Personality measures and market segmentation: Evidence favors interaction view. Business Horizons, 12(3), 61-70.https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(69)90009-3 Cardozo, R. N. (1965). An experimental study of customer effort, expectation, and satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 2(3), 244-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224376500200303 Helson, H. (1948). Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. Psychological Review, 55(6), 297–313. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056721 Howard, J. A., & Sheth, J. N. (1969). The theory of buyer behavior. John Wiley & Sons. Westbrook, R. A., & Reilly, M. D. (1983). Value-percept disparity: An alternative to the disconfirmation of expectations theory of consumer satisfaction. Advances in Consumer Research, 10, 256-261. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1977). Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 888–918. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.84.5.888 Tse, D. K., & Wilton, P. C. (1988). Models of consumer satisfaction formation: An extension. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 204–212. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172652 Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. John Wiley. LaTour, S. A., & Peat, N. C. (1979). Conceptual and methodological issues in consumer satisfaction research. Advances in Consumer Research, 6, 431-437. Churchill, G. A., & Surprenant, C. (1982). An investigation into the determinants of customer satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 19(4), 491–504. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151722 Locke, E. A., Sirota, D., & Wolfson, A. D. (1976). An experimental case study of the successes and failures of job enrichment in a government agency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(6), 701–711. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.61.6.701 Hunt, H.K. (1977) Conceptualization and Measurement of Consumer Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction. Marketing Science Institute. Weng, H. Y., Kass, P. H., Hart, L. A., & Chomel, B. B. (2006). Risk factors for unsuccessful dog ownership: An epidemiologic study in Taiwan. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 77(1-2), 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2006.06.004 Serpell, J. A. (1996). Evidence for an association between pet behavior and owner attachment levels. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 47(1-2), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(95)01010-6 Staats, S., Sears, K., & Pierfelice, L. (2006). Teachers' Pets and Why They Tave Them: An Investigation of the Human Animal Bond. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(8), 1881-1891. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00086.x Page, T. J., Jr., & Spreng, R. A. (2002). Difference scores versus direct effects in service quality measurement. Journal of Service Research, 4(3), 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670502004003002 Gosling, S. D., & Bonnenburg, A. V. (1998). An integrative approach to personality research in anthro-zoology: Ratings of six species of pets and their owners. Anthrozoös, 11(3), 148-156. https://doi.org/10.2752/089279398787000661 Jones, A. C., & Gosling, S. D. (2005). Temperament and personality in dogs (Canis familiaris): A review and evaluation of past research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 95(1-2), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.04.008 Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.5 Curb, L. A., Abramson, C. I., Grice, J. W., & Kennison, S. M. (2013). The relationship between personality match and pet satisfaction among dog owners. Anthrozoös, 26(3), 395-404. https://doi.org/10.2752/175303713X13697429463673 Aronson E , Mills J . The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group [J]. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1959, 59(2):177-181. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96858 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著養寵物的家庭逐年增加，特別是養狗的比例最高，狗在人類生活中的地位日益重要。然而，即使養寵物風行，臺灣仍有許多寵物狗無法被行銷給潛在飼主，導致動物收容所超收問題嚴重。根據資料顯示，全臺三分之一的縣市有收容所超收的情況，並且臺北市與臺南市的犬隻在養佔可留容比例更是達到165%與171%。
研究顯示，54.3%的填答者認為寵物狗的性格特質是取決飼養的最重要因素，且84.6%的填答者將其列為前三名的決策因素。這表明潛在飼主在獲取寵物前對其性格特質有明確期望，而這些期望的達成與否將影響其飼養滿意度。根據期望失驗理論(Expectancy disconfirmation theory)，飼主對寵物的期望與實際感知之間的落差會影響滿意度。 故本研究旨在探討寵物狗的性格特質期望與失驗對飼主主觀飼養滿意度，以及MDORS(Monash Dog Owner Relationship Scale)三個維度的影響，並研究飼主的人格特質在其中的調節作用，其中失驗討論了主觀正向失驗及減法法失驗。基於此，本研究包含以下研究目的： 一、提供飼主獲得寵物狗的參考依據：理解人的特質與狗的特質在特定配對中的影響，提供更具個性化的領養或購買建議，提升飼養滿意度。 二、提供寵物行銷給飼主的訊息方向：通過分析不同人格特質的飼主對寵物的期望性格特質，制定更有針對性的行銷策略，提升飼主的飼養滿意度。 三、降低飼主飼養牴觸因素：通過研究何種寵物性格特質會有較低正向失驗，並予以改進以提升飼養滿意度。 本研究為量化研究，以問卷收集了279位臺灣飼主的填表結果，並以皮爾森相關係數分析和線性迴歸分析據以檢驗研究假設。實證結果如下： 一、反應/主動性高的寵物狗較會降低飼養滿意度，但焦慮/害怕性格特質的寵物狗對飼養滿意度有顯著正向影響。外向性高的飼主更適合選擇高興奮/高度依賴性格特質的寵物狗，親和性高的飼主與焦慮/害怕性格特質的寵物狗匹配能提升情感親密度。 二、針對外向性高的飼主，可以強調寵物狗的興奮/高度依賴特質，但不宜使其有害怕/焦慮性格特質的期望，以吸引這些飼主並提升未來飼養滿意度。針對沉穩性高的飼主，可以強調狗的冷漠/侵略性特質，增加未來飼養時的人寵互動頻率。 三、正向失驗對飼養滿意度有顯著影響，特別是主觀正向失驗。當飼主認為寵物狗的性格特質符合或超出其期望時，滿意度顯著提高，反之則會降低。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As the number of pet-owning households increases annually, especially with the highest proportion being dog owners, the status of dogs in human life is becoming increasingly important. However, despite the popularity of pet ownership, many dogs in Taiwan are still not marketed to potential owners, leading to severe overcrowding in animal shelters. Data shows that one-third of the counties and cities in Taiwan have overcrowded shelters, with the capacity for dogs in Taipei City and Tainan City reaching 165% and 171%, respectively.
Research indicates that 54.3% of respondents believe that the personality traits of pet dogs are the most important factor in deciding to own a pet, and 84.6% list it as one of the top three decision factors. This shows that potential owners have clear expectations for the personality traits of their pets before acquiring them, and whether these expectations are met will affect their satisfaction with pet ownership. According to the Expectancy Disconfirmation Theory, the gap between the owner's expectations and the actual perception of the pet influences satisfaction. Therefore, this study aims to explore the impact of expected and perceived pet personality traits of pet dogs on owner subjective ownership satisfaction, and the influence of the three dimensions of the Monash Dog Owner Relationship Scale (MDORS), as well as the moderating role of the owner's personality traits. The study discusses subjective positive disconfirmation and disconfirmation by the subtraction method. Based on this, the study includes the following research purposes: 1. Provide a reference for owners to acquire pet dogs: Understand the impact of human and dog traits in specific pairings to offer more personalized adoption or purchase advice and enhance ownership satisfaction. 2. Provide marketing messages to owners: Develop more targeted marketing strategies by analyzing the expected personality traits of pets from owners with different personality traits, thereby improving ownership satisfaction. 3. Reduce ownership resistance factors: Study specific pet personality traits that have lower positive disconfirmation and improve them to enhance ownership satisfaction. This quantitative study collected questionnaire responses from 279 Taiwanese owners and used Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis to test the research hypotheses. The empirical results are as follows: 1. Dogs with high Reactive/Assertive traits tend to lower ownership satisfaction, but dogs with Anxious/Fearful traits have a significant positive impact on ownership satisfaction. Owners with high extraversion are more suited to choose dogs with Excitable/Hyper-attached traits, while owners with high agreeableness matched with dogs with Anxious/Fearful traits can enhance emotional closeness. 2. For highly extraverted owners, emphasizing the Excitable/Hyper-attached traits of dogs is advisable, but it is not advisable to expect Anxious/Fearful traits to attract these owners and enhance future ownership satisfaction. For highly stable owners, emphasizing the Aloof/Predatory traits of dogs can increase the frequency of owner-dog interactions in the future. 3. Positive disconfirmation significantly impacts ownership satisfaction, especially subjective positive disconfirmation. When owners believe that the pet personality traits of their pet dogs meet or exceed their expectations, satisfaction significantly increases, and vice versa. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-24T16:17:16Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-24T16:17:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝…………………………………………………………………………………………………I
中文摘要………………………………………………………………………………………II 英文摘要………………………………………………………………………………………IV 目次…………………………………………………………………………………………………VI 圖次………………………………………………………………………………………………VII 表次……………………………………………………………………………………………………X 第一章 緒論……………………………………………………………………………………1 第一節 研究背景與動機……………………………………………………………1 第二節 研究問題與目的……………………………………………………………2 第三節 研究流程……………………………………………………………………………3 第二章 文獻探討……………………………………………………………………………4 第一節 人格特質……………………………………………………………………………4 第二節 寵物性格特質…………………………………………………………………5 第三節 期望失驗理論……………………………………………………………………6 第四節 期望定義………………………………………………………………………………7 第五節 失驗定義………………………………………………………………………………8 第六節 飼養滿意度定義………………………………………………………………8 第三章 研究架構與假設………………………………………………………………10 第一節 研究架構……………………………………………………………………………10 第二節 假設推論……………………………………………………………………………11 第四章 研究方式……………………………………………………………………………23 第一節 研究樣本來源…………………………………………………………………23 第二節 問卷設計……………………………………………………………………………23 第三節 衡量工具與統計分析……………………………………………………24 第四節 研究變數與操作性定義 ……………………………………………25 第五章 資料分析與結果………………………………………………………………36 第一節 敘述性統計…………………………………………………………………………36 第二節 皮爾森相關係數分析………………………………………………………45 第三節 推論假設分析結果……………………………………………………………52 第四節 多元線性迴歸模型分析…………………………………………………74 第六章 結論及建議…………………………………………………………………………86 第一節 研究結果與討論…………………………………………………………………86 第二節 研究限制與建議…………………………………………………………………94 參考文獻…………………………………………………………………………………………………95 附錄……………………………………………………………………………………………………………99 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 人格特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | MDORS | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 飼養滿意度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 失驗理論 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 失驗 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 寵物性格特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Disconfirmation Theory | en |
| dc.subject | Disconfirmation | en |
| dc.subject | Personality Traits | en |
| dc.subject | Pet Personality Traits | en |
| dc.subject | MDORS | en |
| dc.subject | Ownership Satisfaction | en |
| dc.title | 論寵物性格特質期望與失驗對人寵飼養滿意度之影響，以寵物狗為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Pet Personality Trait Expectations and Disconfirmation on Human-Pet Ownership Satisfaction: A Case Study of Dogs | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何筱文;林谷合 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hsiao-Wen Ho;Ku-Ho Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 寵物性格特質,人格特質,失驗,失驗理論,飼養滿意度,MDORS, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Pet Personality Traits,Personality Traits,Disconfirmation,Disconfirmation Theory,Ownership Satisfaction,MDORS, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 103 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404534 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-11-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | N/A | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.78 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。