心理學期刊開放科學政策與研究通透度：應用人物誌於圖書館服務

Abstract

研究誠信乃是學者體現良好科學態度之重要要素，隨著學術界逐漸產生再現性危機之討論聲浪，使得研究通透度與研究再現性為維護研究誠信提供的正面價值備受重視。國際間對於開放科學議題之討論及實踐已有長足發展，其中又以心理學領域展現其豐碩的研究成果。然而，現今國內學術環境對於研究資料開放及再現研究之議題的探討較稀缺。本研究以此為缺口，以臺灣心理學領域作為研究探索的基礎，挖掘期刊編輯與作者於研究通透度與再現性之意見，並探究本土心理學期刊於實踐資料政策之意向。 本研究以期刊編輯與作者為研究對象，使用半結構式深度訪談探索編輯觀點，並輔以問卷調查法蒐集期刊作者意見。本研究透過預先設計之訪談綱要和問卷題項，探索學者對於研究不實行為與研究通透度之間的認知，並討論本土心理學期刊於推動資料政策之意願。本研究額外運用人物誌方法，將研究結果聚斂成三種人物誌，提供具有實境感之學者立場，提供未來圖書館服務規劃之參酌。 研究結果體現出本土心理學者於開放科學的發展抱持肯定價值，而受訪者也為本土期刊是否應推動資料政策進行評估並提出考量。本研究最終彙整學者意見並繪製成三種人物誌，分別刻畫「本土保守派」、「積極響應派」及「理性推動派」三方學者立場。人物誌特質除了展現出重視本土研究價值，且擔憂資料政策影響本土期刊發展之守舊面向；也體現支持學術邁向資料通透、鼓勵期刊推動資料政策，並為政策內容提供細節規劃之積極面向。藉由人物誌揭露之學者觀點與需求，本研究亦以圖書館策劃學術服務之角度，論述相關服務策略之內容。 本研究在於揭示心理學領域學者對於研究通透度與再現性之認知與政策實務推動之考量，以展現本土心理學領域於維護科學誠信之目的。本研究亦描繪出多種面向的人物誌立場，為圖書館提供其策劃學術服務與資源時的參考雛型。

Research integrity is a crucial element in demonstrating a good scientific attitude among scholars. With the increasing discourse on the reproducibility crisis in academia, the positive value of research transparency and reproducibility in maintaining research integrity has garnered significant attention. The international discussions and practices regarding open science have advanced considerably, particularly in the field of psychology, which has achieved notable research results. However, within Taiwanese academic environment, discussions about open research data and reproducibility studies remain scarce. This study addresses this gap by investigating journal editors' and authors’ perceptions of research transparency and reproducibility in the field of psychology in Taiwan, and examining the willingness of Taiwanese psychology journals to implement data-sharing policies. The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining semi-structured in-depth interviews with journal editors to gather qualitative insights and questionnaire surveys to collect quantitative data from authors. Using a pre-designed interview outline and tailored questionnaire, this research explores scholars' perceptions of the relationship between questionable research practices and research transparency, and their attitudes toward adopting data-sharing policies. Additionally, the study incorporates personas to synthesize the findings into three representative figures, providing nuanced and contextually rich perspectives to inform academic library service planning in the future. The results reflect strong support among Taiwanese psychologists for the value of open science. Respondents provided critical considerations and risk assessments regarding the adoption of data policies by Taiwanese journals. The study consolidated these perspectives into three personas: the “Local Preservationist,” the “Proactive Advocate,” and the “Pragmatic Facilitator.” These personas illustrate a range of attitudes, from emphasizing the protection of Taiwanese research values and expressing concerns about the potential impact of data-sharing policies on journal development, to supporting greater data transparency and encouraging journals to implement data-sharing policies with detailed planning. The persona characteristics not only reflect a strong emphasis on safeguarding the value of local research and concerns about the influence of data policies on journal growth but also embody proactive attitudes toward advancing academic transparency, promoting data policies, and providing detailed policy planning. Through the perspectives and requirements of these personas, the study constructs strategies for academic library services to support open science initiatives. This study aims to reveal the perceptions of Taiwanese psychologists regarding research transparency and reproducibility, as well as their considerations in promoting practical data-sharing policies, with the purpose of protecting scientific integrity within the field of Taiwanese psychology. The study also depicts diverse viewpoints of the personas, providing a reference prototype for libraries in planning academic services and resources.