請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96607完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 湯明哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Je Tang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 邱雅慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ya-Hui Chiu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-20T16:10:41Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-21 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-20 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-11-20 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部份
1. 中華人民共和國住房和城鄉建設部，(2012)，《無障礙設計規範：GB 50763-2012》，中國建築工業出版社。 2. 內政部建築研究所，《淨零碳建築評估手冊》，(2023年1月1日)。https://www.abri.gov.tw/ 3. 內政部建築研究所，《智慧建築標章申請審核認可及使用作業要點》，(2023年1月1日)。https://www.abri.gov.tw/ 4. 內政部建築研究所，(2021)，《綠建築評估手冊》，內政部建築研究所。 5. 內政部營建署，《建築物無障礙設施設計規範》，(2020年1月1日)。https://www.cpami.gov.tw/最新消息/法規公告/營建法規/建築管理/27706-建築物無障礙設施設計規範.html 6. 仲量聯行研究部及顧問諮詢部，(2024)，《臺灣臺灣銀髮住宅展望》，仲量聯行)。 7. 李僖雅，(2022)，《以價值鏈矩陣分析營造業之行銷策略-─以丙級營造業B公司為例》，[未出版之碩士論文]，國立中興大學。 8. 周文賢，(1999)，《企業行銷管理》，智勝文化事業有限公司。 9. 林玉子，(1999)，《40歲開始打造舒適的家園》，遠流出版社。. 10. 林憲德，(2021)，《智慧建築的發展與未來趨勢》，建築學報，35(2): 1-15. 11. 馬瑞辰，(2022)，《談臺灣臺灣房地產現況》。 12. 陳政雄，(2006)，《老人住宅整體規劃理念》，《臺灣臺灣老年醫學雜誌》， 1(3),122-139. 13. 黃宣慈，(2014)，《有關終生住宅的理念與實證調查》，[未出版之碩士論文]， 國立雲林科技大學。 14. 黃耀榮，(2006)，《實現「在地老化」之終生住宅發展形式探討》，《臺灣臺灣老年醫學雜誌》, 1(3), 138-150. 15. 賴玉莉，(2018)，《建設公司差異化行銷策略之研究》，[未出版之碩士論文]，國立雲林科技大學。 16. 蘇政華，(2023)，《社會住宅具備終生住宅功能之可行性初探》，[未出版之碩士論文]，淡江大學。 二、英文部份 1. Anane, W., Iordanova, I. & Ouellet-Plamondon, C.,“Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Robotic Manufacturing Technological Interoperability in Construction─A Cyclic Systematic Literature Review”, Digital Manufacturing Technology, 3(1), 1-29, (2023). 2. Archdaily, “UNStudio designs reconfigurable apartments for Munich residents”, https://www.archdaily.com/976205/unstudio-designs-reconfigurable-apartments-for-munich-residents 3. Archdaily, “UNStudio introduces new flexible urban living concept in Munich”, https://www.archdaily.com/956877/unstudio-introduces-new-flexible-urban-living-concept-in-the-van-b-residences-in-munich 4. Armstrong, G., Kotler, P. & Opresnik, M. O., “Marketing: An introduction (13th ed.)”, Pearson Education Limited, (2017). 5. Badi, S., Wang, L. & Pryke, S., “Relationship marketing in Guanxi networks: A social network analysis study of Chinese construction small and medium-sized enterprises”, Industrial Marketing Management, 60, 204-218, (2017). 6. Bre Global, “What is BREEAM?”, https://www.breeam.com/ 7. Building and Construction Authority, “Innovative design in public housing”, BCA Publications, Singapore, (2023). 8. Chan, H. K., He, H., & Wang, W. Y. C., “Green industrial marketing and its impact on supply chain management in industrial markets”, Industrial Marketing Management, 41(4), 557-562, (2012). 9. Chan, K. L., Zhang, W., “Vertical forest design in urban architecture”, Architectural Review, 45(3), 234-248, (2023). 10. Crespin-Mazet, F., Havenvid, M. I. & Linne, A., “Antecedents of project partnering in the construction industry─The impact of relationship history”, Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 4-15, (2015). 11. Cruz, P. L., Ávila, L. V., Dinis, & M. A. P., et al., “Environmental, social and governance (ESG) and innovation in the construction sector: Systematic Literature Review”, Revista de Administração da UFSM, 16(4), e1. (2023). 12. Daissaoui, A., Boulmakoul, A. & Karim, L., et al., “IoT and Big Data Analytics for Smart Buildings: A Survey”, Procedia Computer Science, 170, 161-168, (2020). 13. Danivska, V., Heywood, C., Christersson, M., et al., “Environmental and social sustainability in the workplace: A longitudinal analysis of WELL-certified buildings”, Building and Environment, 209, 108605, (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108605 14. Das, S., Ickowicz, L., & Sharma, M,. “Industry 4.0 technologies for business model innovation: A systematic literature review and future research agenda”, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 188, 122248, (2023). 15. Ejidike, C. C. & Mewomo, M. C., “Benefits of adopting smart building technologies in building construction of developing countries: review of literature”, SN Applied Sciences, 5(1), 52, (2023). 16. European Commission, “Nearly zero-energy buildings”, https://ec.europa.eu/energy/topics/energy-efficiency/energy-efficient-buildings/nearly-zero-energy-buildings_en 17. Forcael, E., Ferrari, I. & Opazo-Vega, A., et al., “Construction 4.0: A literature review”, Sustainability, 12(22), 9755, (2020). 18. Goldsmith, S., “Universal design: A manual of practical guidance for architects”, Routledge, London, (2000). 19. Gratton, L., Scott, A. J., “The 100-Year Life: Living and Working in an Age of Longevity”, Bloomsbury Publishing, London, (2016). 20. Haddadi, A., Hosseini, A. & Johansen, A., et al., “Pursuing value creation in construction by research─A study of applied research methodologies”, Procedia Computer Science, 121, 1080-1087, (2017). 21. Han, P., Wang, L. & Song, Y., et al., “Designing for the post-pandemic era: Trends, focuses, and strategies learned from architectural competitions based on a text analysis”, Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1084562, (2022). 22. Hernández-Moral, G., Sánchez-Úbeda, E. F., & Muñoz-Hernández, J. I., “ Big data value analysis in the construction industry: A general framework and applications”, Sustainability, 13(4), 2312, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-12739-7 https://doi.org/10.5902/1983465975315 23. International Organization for Standardization, “ISO/IEC 30141:2018 Internet of Things (IoT) — Reference Architecture”, https://www.iso.org/standard/65695.html 24. International Well Building Institute, “WELL Building Standard”, https://www.wellcertified.com/ 25. Johnson, G., Whittington, R. & Scholes, K., et al., “ Exploring strategy: Text and cases (11th ed.) ”, Pearson, (2017). 26. Kaza, S., Yao, L., Bhada-Tata, P., & et al., “What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050, World Bank, (2018) https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/30317 27. Kibert, C. J., “Sustainable construction: Green building design and delivery”, John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, (2016). 28. Kim, D., Yoon, Y. & Lee, J., et al., “Design and Implementation of Smart Buildings: A Review of Current Research Trend”, Energies, 15(12), 4278, (2022). 29. Kotler, P., “Marketing management: Analysis, planning, implementation and control (9th ed.)”, Prentice-Hall, (1998). 30. Kretz, D., Teich, T. & Franke, D., et al., “Interconnection of Smart Homes and Smart Buildings as a Building Block of Smart Cities”, In M. Hemmje & G. Krampen (Eds.), Wissens- und Innovationsmanagement in der Wolke (pp.595-609) Springer Vieweg, (2020). 31. Lee, S. K., Chen, Y., Wong, T. C., “Age-friendly community development in Singapore”, Urban Studies, 38(2), 156-171, (2023). 32. Li, W., & Wang, X., “Innovations on management of sustainable construction in a large earthwork project: An Australian case research”, Procedia Engineering, 145, 677-684, (2016). 33. Li, Y., Rong, Y. & Ahmad, U. M., et al., “A comprehensive review on green buildings research: Bibliometric analysis during 1998~2018”, Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(45), 63187-63211, (2021). 34. Lim, J. Y., Chen, W., “Demographic changes and urban planning in Singapore”, Planning Practice & Research, 38(1), 89-104, (2023). 35. Liu, J., Lau, S. & Liu, S. S., et al., “ How Firm's Commitment to ESG Drives Green and Low-Carbon Transition: A Longitudinal Case Study from Hang Lung Properties”, Sustainability, 16(2), 711, (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020711 36. Luciano, A., Pascale, F. & Polverino, F., et al., “Measuring age-friendly housing: A framework”, Sustainability, 12(3), 848, (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12030848 37. McCarthy, E. J., “Basic marketing: A managerial approach”, Richard D, Irwin, (1960). 38. McWilliam, S. E., “Global Value Chain Governance Dynamics: A Co-Evolutionary Perspective on the Transition from Relational to Modular Governance in Construction”, AIB Insights, (2023). https://doi.org/10.46697/001c.88528 39. Metalocus, “Facilitate meetings, build community. Van B residences by UNStudio”, https://www.metalocus.es/en/news/facilitate-meetings-build-community-van-b-residences-unstudio 40. Mihajlović, L. S., & Mihajlović, M., “Digital Marketing in Practice”, SCIENCE International Journal, 2(4), 25-31, (2023). https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0204025m 41. Munaro, M. R., Tavares, S. F., & Bragança, L., “Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, 121134, (2020). 42. Naji, K. K., Gunduz, M. & Alhenzab, F. H., et al.,. “A systematic review of the digital transformation of the building construction industry”, IEEE Access, 12, 31461-31487, (2024) 43. Nguyen, T. H., Toroghi, S. H., & Jacobs, F., “Automated data integration in the construction value chain: A literature review and future research agenda”, Automation in Construction, 130, 103838, (2021). 44. Porter, M. E., “Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance”, Free Press, (1985). 45. Preiser, W. F. E., Smith, K. H., “Universal design handbook”, McGraw Hill Professional, New York, (2010). 46. Sajjad, M., Colicchia, C. &Castorini, E., et al., “A novel framework for understanding Industry 4.0 digital transformation processes: An empirical investigation in the construction industry”, International Journal of Production Economics, 256, 108708, (2023). 47. Sawhney, A., Riley, M., & Irizarry, J., “Construction 4.0: An innovation platform for the built environment”, Routledge, (2020). 48. Setiawan, H., Erdogan, B., & Ogunlana, S. O., “Proactiveness of contractors: A study of Indonesia”, Procedia Engineering, 125, 60-67, (2015). 49. Singapore Green Building Council, “Green building assessment report”, SGBC, Singapore, (2023). 50. Soares, G. G., & Pereira, F. H., “Study of ESG criteria and metrics for the construction industry”, Annals of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 6, 62-63, (2022). 51. Song, J., “Key points in planning and design of residential communities based on all-age communities”, BCP Business & Management WTED, 33, 109-115, (2022). 52. Song, J., Louceiro, J. & Dias, L., et al.“ Design for all: An overview of needs and gaps in formal education in four European countries”, BCP Business & Management WTED 2022, 33, 109-115, (2022). 53. Stylepark, “Flexible living in Munich”, https://www.stylepark.com/en/news/van-b-ben-van-berkel-un-studio-munich-stylepark-magazin 54. Synnott, J., Chen, L., Nugent, C. D., et al., “Assessment and visualization of smart building standards in relation to healthcare applications”, IEEE Access, 9, 12251-12266, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051714 55. Tan, P. Y., Wong, N. H., Lee, M. K., “Environmental benefits of urban greenery”, Sustainable Cities and Society, 89, 104523, (2023). 56. U.S. Green Building Council, “LEED rating system”, https://www.usgbc.org/leed 57. U.S. Green Building Council, “LEED Zero”, https://www.usgbc.org/leed/rating-systems/leed-zero 58. United Nations, “Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division”,. World population ageing, (2017). 59. United Nations, The Global Compact, “Who Cares Wins: Connecting the Financial Markets to a Changing World?”, https://www.unglobalcompact.org/docs/issues_doc/Financial_markets/who_cares_who_wins.pdf 60. United States Access Board, “ADA Standards for Accessible Design”, https://www.access-board.gov/ada/ 61. Unstudio, “Van B”, https://www.unstudio.com/en/page/12411/van-b 62. Van der Heijden, J., “Construction 4.0 in a narrow and broad sense: A systematic and comprehensive literature review”, Building and Environment, 244, 110788, (2023). 63. Van der Heijden, J., “Construction 4.0 in a narrow and broad sense: a systematic and comprehensive literature review”, Building and Environment, 244, 110788, (2023). 64. Van Hoof, J., Boerenfijn, P. & Beneken Genaamd Kolmer, D. M., et al, “Environmental design for an ageing population”, In A. Phelan & D. O'Shea (Eds.), Changing Horizons in the 21st Century: Perspectives on Ageing (pp.268-290), Cambridge Scholars Publishing, (2020). 65. Van Hoof, J., Boerenfijn, P., Beneken Genaamd Kolmer, D. M., et al., “Environmental design for an ageing population”, In Phelan, A., O'Shea, D., Changing Horizons in the 21st Century: Perspectives on Ageing, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, 268-290, (2020). 66. Van Uffelen, C., “Flexible housing”, Braun Publishing, Salenstein, (2023). 67. Villa, V., Cavallaro, P. A. R., & Ciribini, A. L. C., “A scientometric analysis of ESG criteria implementation in the construction industry”, European Journal of Public Procurement Markets, 5(1), 46-71, (2023). 68. Wang, J., & Xue, F., “Emerging Trends of ESG in the Construction Sector: A Promising Pathway to Sustainable and Responsible Development”, In Proceedings of the 28th International Symposium on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate (CRIOCM2023). Springer, (2023). 69. Wong, P. K., Liu, S. J., “Intergenerational integration in modern communities”, Journal of Urban Planning, 28(4), 312-327, (2023). 70. Wong, T. C., Heng, Y. K., “Innovative community development in Singapore”, Urban Studies Quarterly, 35(2), 178-195, (2022). 71. Xue, F., & Fan, K. (2024). Technological innovation as a catalyst for ESG development in construction: A systematic review”, Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 136789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136789 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96607 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究探討了「永生好宅」這一創新居住模式如何將環境、社會與治理(ESG)標準融入建築業的商業運營和設計策略中。在面對環境變化、人口老齡化以及百歲人生時代來臨，加上智慧科技應用的背景下，本研究歸納出未來建築業須滿足的五大核心指標：全齡、健康、永續、智慧和安全。
通過分析三個現有案例(陶朱隱園、Van B與Kampung Admiralty)，深入探討了ESG整合、永續創新、價值鏈重構、市場定位等關鍵議題。藉由探討一個未來可能實現的永生好宅案例，研究結果表明，"永生好宅"模式展示了一種系統性的ESG整合方法，實現了環境、社會和經濟效益之間的動態平衡，並通過價值鏈重構提升了運營效率和市場表現。 此外，研究發現「永生好宅」採用了多層次的市場定位策略和共創式的服務創新模式，青銀住宅共居（Co-living）共用的概念，促進了組織學習與能力建設，並開發了創新方法來量化和管理其社會影響力。 基於研究結果，本文提出了一系列管理建議，包括全面整合ESG標準、加大創新技術投資、採用生命週期管理方法、強化利益相關者參與、培養跨學科人才等。本研究為建築業的永續發展提供了新的理論視角和實踐指導，為未來研究開闢了廣闊的方向。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study examines the manner in which the innovative "Infinity Residential" model incorporates Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards into architectural business operations and design strategies. In the context of environmental changes, an aging population, the advent of the 100-year life era, and the application of smart technologies, this study identifies five core indicators for the future construction industry: age-friendly, health, sustainability, intelligence, and safety.
Through the analysis of three existing cases (Tao Zhu Yin Yuan, Van B, and Kampung Admiralty), the findings indicate that the "Infinity Residential" model demonstrates a systematic approach to ESG integration, achieving a dynamic balance between environmental, social, and economic benefits while enhancing operational efficiency through value chain reconstruction. Furthermore, the research reveals that the model adopts a multi-layered market positioning strategy and promotes youth-elderly co-living (Co-living) concepts. Based on the findings, this paper proposes a series of management recommendations, including comprehensive ESG integration, increased investment in innovative technologies, adoption of life-cycle management approaches, strengthened stakeholder engagement, and cultivation of interdisciplinary talent. This study provides new theoretical perspectives and practical guidance for the sustainable development of the construction industry, while opening up broad directions for future research. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-20T16:10:41Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-20T16:10:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
致謝 ii 中文摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目次 v 圖次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節、研究背景與動機 1 第二節、研究問題與目的 3 第三節、研究方法與架構 4 第四節、研究範圍與限制 7 第二章 理論基礎與文獻綜論 9 第一節、PEST分析 9 第二節、價值鏈分析 11 第三節、STP與行銷4P分析 13 第四節、ESG在建築業中的影響與趨勢 16 第三章 台灣建築業綜析：環境、價值鏈與未來趨勢 21 第一節、建築業PEST分析 21 第二節、建築業價值鏈分析 23 第三節、現有建築業的標準 30 第四節、建築業未來發展趨勢分析 32 第四章 建築創新設計策略：永生好宅與ESG實踐 35 第一節、永生好宅的概念與核心理念 35 第二節、滿足的未來建築需求的五大評估指標 37 第三節、永生好宅的ESG整合實踐與創新發展 46 第五章 滿足永生好宅概念的相關案例研究 49 第一節、陶朱隱園案例介紹與分析 49 第二節、Van B案例介紹與分析 56 第三節、Kampung Admiralty案例介紹與分析 60 第六章 創新住宅模式的規劃 67 第一節、背景說明 67 第二節、永生好宅設計概念 68 第三節、市場策略分析 71 第四節、實施策略、挑戰與風險 72 第五節、永生好宅創新模式的ESG整合實踐 74 第六節、本章小結 75 第七章 研究結論與展望 77 第一節、研究結論 77 第二節、管理意涵 79 第三節、研究展望 81 參考文獻 83 圖次 圖1-1 論文框架圖 6 圖2-1 ESG組成說明 17 圖5-1 陶朱隱園垂直森林概念圖 53 圖5-2 陶朱隱園環形擋土牆示意圖 54 圖5-3 Van B 57 圖5-4 個人空間有更多功能彈性：可同時用作辦公室、健身房、客廳、睡眠的角落58 圖5-5 新加坡第一座老年公寓Kampung Admiralty 63 圖5-6 Kampung Admiralty垂直花園系統 64 圖6-1 智慧能源管理建築 70 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 基於ESG的永生好宅設計策略和商業運營研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Strategic Design and Commercial Operations of Infinity Residential: An ESG-Based Approach | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭明;謝明慧;金立印 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ming Zheng;Ming-Huei Hsieh;Liyin Jin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 永生好宅,環境社會治理,智慧建築,全齡化設計,綠色建築, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Infinity Residential,ESG,Smart Building,Universal Design,Green Building, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 89 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404579 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-11-21 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-21 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 臺大-復旦EMBA境外專班 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 3.47 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。