請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96538完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳逸然 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yet-Ran Chen | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 簡嘉葳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Jia-Wei Jian | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-19T16:25:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Jones, J.D. and J.L. Dangl, The plant immune system. nature, 2006. 444(7117): p. 323-329.
2. Wang, W., et al., Plant immune signaling: Advancing on two frontiers. J Integr Plant Biol, 2020. 62(1): p. 2-24. 3. Serrano, I., C. Audran, and S. Rivas, Chloroplasts at work during plant innate immunity. J Exp Bot, 2016. 67(13): p. 3845-54. 4. Eckardt, N.A., The Plant Cell Reviews Plant Immunity: Receptor-Like Kinases, ROS-RLK Crosstalk, Quantitative Resistance, and the Growth/Defense Trade-Off. Plant Cell, 2017. 29(4): p. 601-602. 5. Ali, S., A. Tyagi, and Z.A. Mir, Plant Immunity: At the Crossroads of Pathogen Perception and Defense Response. Plants (Basel), 2024. 13(11). 6. Han, Z., et al., The function of plant PR1 and other members of the CAP protein superfamily in plant-pathogen interactions. Mol Plant Pathol, 2023. 24(6): p. 651-668. 7. Jamieson, P.A., L. Shan, and P. He, Plant cell surface molecular cypher: Receptor-like proteins and their roles in immunity and development. Plant Sci, 2018. 274: p. 242-251. 8. Wang, G., et al., A genome-wide functional investigation into the roles of receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant physiology, 2008. 147(2): p. 503-517. 9. Yang, X., F. Deng, and K.M. Ramonell, Receptor-like kinases and receptor-like proteins: keys to pathogen recognition and defense signaling in plant innate immunity. Frontiers in Biology, 2012. 7: p. 155-166. 10. Felix, G., et al., Plants have a sensitive perception system for the most conserved domain of bacterial flagellin. The Plant Journal, 1999. 18(3): p. 265-276. 11. Zipfel, C., Early molecular events in PAMP-triggered immunity. Current opinion in plant biology, 2009. 12(4): p. 414-420. 12. Shiu, S.-H. and A.B. Bleecker, Expansion of the receptor-like kinase/Pelle gene family and receptor-like proteins in Arabidopsis. Plant physiology, 2003. 132(2): p. 530-543. 13. Zipfel, C., et al., Perception of the bacterial PAMP EF-Tu by the receptor EFR restricts Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Cell, 2006. 125(4): p. 749-760. 14. Aslam, S.N., et al., Bacterial polysaccharides suppress induced innate immunity by calcium chelation. Current Biology, 2008. 18(14): p. 1078-1083. 15. Bedini, E., et al., Structure-dependent modulation of a pathogen response in plants by synthetic O-antigen polysaccharides. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2005. 127(8): p. 2414-2416. 16. van de Veerdonk, F.L., et al., Host–microbe interactions: innate pattern recognition of fungal pathogens. Current opinion in microbiology, 2008. 11(4): p. 305-312. 17. Meindl, T., T. Boller, and G. Felix, The bacterial elicitor flagellin activates its receptor in tomato cells according to the address-message concept. Plant Cell, 2000. 12(9): p. 1783-94. 18. Segonzac, C. and J. Monaghan, Modulation of plant innate immune signaling by small peptides. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2019. 51: p. 22-28. 19. Gust, A.A., R. Pruitt, and T. Nurnberger, Sensing Danger: Key to Activating Plant Immunity. Trends Plant Sci, 2017. 22(9): p. 779-791. 20. Upson, J.L., et al., The coming of age of EvoMPMI: evolutionary molecular plant–microbe interactions across multiple timescales. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2018. 44: p. 108-116. 21. Jones, J.D., R.E. Vance, and J.L. Dangl, Intracellular innate immune surveillance devices in plants and animals. Science, 2016. 354(6316). 22. Maruta, N., et al., Structural basis of NLR activation and innate immune signalling in plants. Immunogenetics, 2022. 74(1): p. 5-26. 23. Feehan, J.M., et al., Plant NLRs get by with a little help from their friends. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2020. 56: p. 99-108. 24. Horsefield, S., et al., NAD(+) cleavage activity by animal and plant TIR domains in cell death pathways. Science, 2019. 365(6455): p. 793-799. 25. Hu, M. and J.M. Zhou, Research on ADR1s helps understanding the plant immune network. Stress Biol, 2022. 2(1): p. 12. 26. Altenbach, D. and S. Robatzek, Pattern recognition receptors: from the cell surface to intracellular dynamics. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions, 2007. 20(9): p. 1031-1039. 27. DeYoung, B.J. and R.W. Innes, Plant NBS-LRR proteins in pathogen sensing and host defense. Nat Immunol, 2006. 7(12): p. 1243-9. 28. Hetherington, A.M. and F.I. Woodward, The role of stomata in sensing and driving environmental change. Nature, 2003. 424(6951): p. 901-8. 29. Melotto, M., W. Underwood, and S.Y. He, Role of stomata in plant innate immunity and foliar bacterial diseases. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2008. 46: p. 101-22. 30. Bharath, P., S. Gahir, and A.S. Raghavendra, Abscisic Acid-Induced Stomatal Closure: An Important Component of Plant Defense Against Abiotic and Biotic Stress. Front Plant Sci, 2021. 12: p. 615114. 31. Lim, C.W., et al., Function of ABA in Stomatal Defense against Biotic and Drought Stresses. Int J Mol Sci, 2015. 16(7): p. 15251-70. 32. Melotto, M., et al., Plant stomata function in innate immunity against bacterial invasion. Cell, 2006. 126(5): p. 969-80. 33. Torii, K.U., Plant signaling: Peptide-receptor pair re-opens stomata after pathogen infection. Curr Biol, 2022. 32(14): p. R783-R786. 34. Klessig, D.F., H.W. Choi, and D.A. Dempsey, Systemic Acquired Resistance and Salicylic Acid: Past, Present, and Future. Mol Plant Microbe Interact, 2018. 31(9): p. 871-888. 35. Zhang, L., et al., Jasmonate signaling and manipulation by pathogens and insects. J Exp Bot, 2017. 68(6): p. 1371-1385. 36. Bauer, H., et al., The stomatal response to reduced relative humidity requires guard cell-autonomous ABA synthesis. Curr Biol, 2013. 23(1): p. 53-7. 37. Ikegami, K., et al., Activation of abscisic acid biosynthesis in the leaves of Arabidopsis thaliana in response to water deficit. J Plant Res, 2009. 122(2): p. 235-43. 38. Zeng, W. and S.Y. He, A prominent role of the flagellin receptor FLAGELLIN-SENSING2 in mediating stomatal response to Pseudomonas syringae pv tomato DC3000 in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2010. 153(3): p. 1188-98. 39. Du, X., et al., H 2 S is involved in ABA-mediated stomatal movement through MPK4 to alleviate drought stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant and Soil, 2019. 435: p. 295-307. 40. Klingler, J.P., G. Batelli, and J.K. Zhu, ABA receptors: the START of a new paradigm in phytohormone signalling. J Exp Bot, 2010. 61(12): p. 3199-210. 41. Cutler, S.R., et al., Abscisic acid: emergence of a core signaling network. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2010. 61: p. 651-79. 42. Hou, S., et al., Small holes, big impact: Stomata in plant-pathogen-climate epic trifecta. Mol Plant, 2024. 17(1): p. 26-49. 43. Hsu, P.K., et al., Signaling mechanisms in abscisic acid-mediated stomatal closure. Plant J, 2021. 105(2): p. 307-321. 44. Sirichandra, C., et al., Phosphorylation of the Arabidopsis AtrbohF NADPH oxidase by OST1 protein kinase. FEBS Lett, 2009. 583(18): p. 2982-6. 45. Berkowitz, G., et al., Co-expression of calcium-dependent protein kinase with the inward rectified guard cell K+ channel KAT1 alters current parameters in Xenopus laevis oocytes. Plant Cell Physiol, 2000. 41(6): p. 785-90. 46. Geiger, D., et al., Stomatal closure by fast abscisic acid signaling is mediated by the guard cell anion channel SLAH3 and the receptor RCAR1. Sci Signal, 2011. 4(173): p. ra32. 47. Pei, Z.M., et al., Calcium channels activated by hydrogen peroxide mediate abscisic acid signalling in guard cells. Nature, 2000. 406(6797): p. 731-4. 48. Su, J., et al., Regulation of Stomatal Immunity by Interdependent Functions of a Pathogen-Responsive MPK3/MPK6 Cascade and Abscisic Acid. Plant Cell, 2017. 29(3): p. 526-542. 49. Devireddy, A.R., J. Arbogast, and R. Mittler, Coordinated and rapid whole-plant systemic stomatal responses. New Phytol, 2020. 225(1): p. 21-25. 50. Devireddy, A.R., et al., Coordinating the overall stomatal response of plants: Rapid leaf-to-leaf communication during light stress. Sci Signal, 2018. 11(518). 51. David, L., et al., Multi-Omics Revealed Molecular Mechanisms Underlying Guard Cell Systemic Acquired Resistance. Int J Mol Sci, 2020. 22(1). 52. Guan, Q., et al., Role of NPR1 in Systemic Acquired Stomatal Immunity. Plants (Basel), 2023. 12(11). 53. Wang, C., et al., A nonspecific lipid transfer protein, StLTP10, mediates resistance to Phytophthora infestans in potato. Mol Plant Pathol, 2021. 22(1): p. 48-63. 54. Czekus, Z., et al., Role of ethylene and light in chitosan-induced local and systemic defence responses of tomato plants. J Plant Physiol, 2021. 263: p. 153461. 55. Sakata, N., et al., Acibenzolar-S-Methyl Activates Stomatal-Based Defense Systemically in Japanese Radish. Front Plant Sci, 2020. 11: p. 565745. 56. Melotto, M., et al., Fighting for Survival at the Stomatal Gate. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2024. 75(1): p. 551-577. 57. Durrant, W.E. and X. Dong, Systemic acquired resistance. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol., 2004. 42: p. 185-209. 58. Bektas, Y. and T. Eulgem, Synthetic plant defense elicitors. Frontiers in plant science, 2015. 5: p. 804. 59. Ross, A.F., Systemic acquired resistance induced by localized virus infections in plants. Virology, 1961. 14: p. 340-58. 60. Seyfferth, C. and K. Tsuda, Salicylic acid signal transduction: the initiation of biosynthesis, perception and transcriptional reprogramming. Front Plant Sci, 2014. 5: p. 697. 61. Metraux, J.P., et al., Increase in salicylic Acid at the onset of systemic acquired resistance in cucumber. Science, 1990. 250(4983): p. 1004-6. 62. van Loon, L.C., The Intelligent Behavior of Plants. Trends Plant Sci, 2016. 21(4): p. 286-294. 63. Gamir, J., et al., The sterol-binding activity of PATHOGENESIS-RELATED PROTEIN 1 reveals the mode of action of an antimicrobial protein. Plant J, 2017. 89(3): p. 502-509. 64. Ryals, J.A., et al., Systemic acquired resistance. The plant cell, 1996. 8(10): p. 1809. 65. Yalpani, N., et al., Salicylic acid is a systemic signal and an inducer of pathogenesis-related proteins in virus-infected tobacco. Plant Cell, 1991. 3(8): p. 809-18. 66. Rasmussen, J.B., R. Hammerschmidt, and M.N. Zook, Systemic Induction of Salicylic Acid Accumulation in Cucumber after Inoculation with Pseudomonas syringae pv syringae. Plant Physiol, 1991. 97(4): p. 1342-7. 67. Delaney, T.P., et al., A central role of salicylic Acid in plant disease resistance. Science, 1994. 266(5188): p. 1247-50. 68. Beffa, R., et al., Cholera toxin elevates pathogen resistance and induces defense reactions in transgenic tobacco plants. EMBO J, 1995. 14: p. 5753-5761. 69. Champigny, M.J., et al., Long distance movement of DIR1 and investigation of the role of DIR1-like during systemic acquired resistance in Arabidopsis. Front Plant Sci, 2013. 4: p. 230. 70. Chanda, B., et al., Glycerol-3-phosphate is a critical mobile inducer of systemic immunity in plants. Nat Genet, 2011. 43(5): p. 421-7. 71. Chaturvedi, R., et al., An abietane diterpenoid is a potent activator of systemic acquired resistance. Plant J, 2012. 71(1): p. 161-72. 72. Chen, Y.C., et al., N-hydroxy-pipecolic acid is a mobile metabolite that induces systemic disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2018. 115(21): p. E4920-E4929. 73. El-Shetehy, M., et al., Nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species are required for systemic acquired resistance in plants. Plant Signal Behav, 2015. 10(9): p. e998544. 74. Mandal, M.K., et al., Glycerol-3-phosphate and systemic immunity. Plant Signal Behav, 2011. 6(11): p. 1871-4. 75. Navarova, H., et al., Pipecolic acid, an endogenous mediator of defense amplification and priming, is a critical regulator of inducible plant immunity. Plant Cell, 2012. 24(12): p. 5123-41. 76. Park, S.W., et al., Methyl salicylate is a critical mobile signal for plant systemic acquired resistance. Science, 2007. 318(5847): p. 113-6. 77. Wang, C., et al., Extracellular pyridine nucleotides trigger plant systemic immunity through a lectin receptor kinase/BAK1 complex. Nat Commun, 2019. 10(1): p. 4810. 78. Chen, Z., et al., Biosynthesis of salicylic acid in plants. Plant Signal Behav, 2009. 4(6): p. 493-6. 79. Coquoz, J.L., A. Buchala, and J.P. Metraux, The biosynthesis of salicylic acid in potato plants. Plant Physiol, 1998. 117(3): p. 1095-101. 80. Mauch-Mani, B. and A.J. Slusarenko, Production of Salicylic Acid Precursors Is a Major Function of Phenylalanine Ammonia-Lyase in the Resistance of Arabidopsis to Peronospora parasitica. Plant Cell, 1996. 8(2): p. 203-212. 81. Meuwly, P., et al., Local and Systemic Biosynthesis of Salicylic Acid in Infected Cucumber Plants. Plant Physiol, 1995. 109(3): p. 1107-1114. 82. Pallas, J.A., et al., Tobacco plants epigenetically suppressed in phenylalanine ammonia‐lyase expression do not develop systemic acquired resistance in response to infection by tobacco mosaic virus. The Plant Journal, 1996. 10(2): p. 281-293. 83. Strawn, M.A., et al., Arabidopsis isochorismate synthase functional in pathogen-induced salicylate biosynthesis exhibits properties consistent with a role in diverse stress responses. J Biol Chem, 2007. 282(8): p. 5919-33. 84. Gao, H., et al., Signals in systemic acquired resistance of plants against microbial pathogens. Mol Biol Rep, 2021. 48(4): p. 3747-3759. 85. Garcion, C., et al., Characterization and biological function of the ISOCHORISMATE SYNTHASE2 gene of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2008. 147(3): p. 1279-87. 86. Wildermuth, M.C., et al., Isochorismate synthase is required to synthesize salicylic acid for plant defence. Nature, 2001. 414(6863): p. 562-5. 87. Molders, W., A. Buchala, and J.P. Metraux, Transport of Salicylic Acid in Tobacco Necrosis Virus-Infected Cucumber Plants. Plant Physiol, 1996. 112(2): p. 787-792. 88. Lim, G.H., et al., Plasmodesmata Localizing Proteins Regulate Transport and Signaling during Systemic Acquired Immunity in Plants. Cell Host Microbe, 2016. 19(4): p. 541-9. 89. Vernooij, B., et al., Salicylic Acid Is Not the Translocated Signal Responsible for Inducing Systemic Acquired Resistance but Is Required in Signal Transduction. Plant Cell, 1994. 6(7): p. 959-965. 90. Kachroo, A. and P. Kachroo, Fatty Acid-derived signals in plant defense. Annu Rev Phytopathol, 2009. 47: p. 153-76. 91. Mandal, M.K., et al., Glycerol-3-phosphate and systemic immunity. Plant signaling & behavior, 2011. 6(11): p. 1871-1874. 92. Ohlrogge, J. and J. Browse, Lipid biosynthesis. Plant Cell, 1995. 7(7): p. 957-70. 93. Nandi, A., R. Welti, and J. Shah, The Arabidopsis thaliana dihydroxyacetone phosphate reductase gene SUPPRESSSOR OF FATTY ACID DESATURASE DEFICIENCY1 is required for glycerolipid metabolism and for the activation of systemic acquired resistance. Plant Cell, 2004. 16(2): p. 465-77. 94. Shine, M.B., et al., Signaling mechanisms underlying systemic acquired resistance to microbial pathogens. Plant Sci, 2019. 279: p. 81-86. 95. Chanda, B., et al., Glycerol-3-phosphate levels are associated with basal resistance to the hemibiotrophic fungus Colletotrichum higginsianum in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol, 2008. 147(4): p. 2017-29. 96. Maldonado, A.M., et al., A putative lipid transfer protein involved in systemic resistance signalling in Arabidopsis. Nature, 2002. 419(6905): p. 399-403. 97. Jung, H.W., et al., Priming in systemic plant immunity. Science, 2009. 324(5923): p. 89-91. 98. Fu, Z.Q. and X. Dong, Systemic acquired resistance: turning local infection into global defense. Annu Rev Plant Biol, 2013. 64: p. 839-63. 99. Shah, J., et al., Signaling by small metabolites in systemic acquired resistance. Plant J, 2014. 79(4): p. 645-58. 100. Cecchini, N.M., et al., Arabidopsis AZI1 family proteins mediate signal mobilization for systemic defence priming. Nat Commun, 2015. 6: p. 7658. 101. Dempsey, D.A. and D.F. Klessig, SOS - too many signals for systemic acquired resistance? Trends Plant Sci, 2012. 17(9): p. 538-45. 102. Hartmann, M., et al., Biochemical Principles and Functional Aspects of Pipecolic Acid Biosynthesis in Plant Immunity. Plant Physiol, 2017. 174(1): p. 124-153. 103. Aliferis, K.A., D. Faubert, and S. Jabaji, A metabolic profiling strategy for the dissection of plant defense against fungal pathogens. PLoS One, 2014. 9(11): p. e111930. 104. Pálfi, G. and L. Dézsi, Pipecolic acid as an indicator of abnormal protein metabolism in diseased plants. Plant and Soil, 1968. 29: p. 285-291. 105. Vogel-Adghough, D., et al., Pipecolic acid enhances resistance to bacterial infection and primes salicylic acid and nicotine accumulation in tobacco. Plant Signal Behav, 2013. 8(11): p. e26366. 106. Pazarlar, S., Exogenous application of pipecolic acid induces stomatal closure in Arabidopsis thaliana L. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 2024. 61(2): p. 143-150. 107. Ding, P., et al., Characterization of a Pipecolic Acid Biosynthesis Pathway Required for Systemic Acquired Resistance. Plant Cell, 2016. 28(10): p. 2603-2615. 108. Liu, P.P., C.C. von Dahl, and D.F. Klessig, The extent to which methyl salicylate is required for signaling systemic acquired resistance is dependent on exposure to light after infection. Plant Physiol, 2011. 157(4): p. 2216-26. 109. Hartmann, M., et al., Flavin Monooxygenase-Generated N-Hydroxypipecolic Acid Is a Critical Element of Plant Systemic Immunity. Cell, 2018. 173(2): p. 456-469 e16. 110. Hartmann, M. and J. Zeier, N-hydroxypipecolic acid and salicylic acid: a metabolic duo for systemic acquired resistance. Curr Opin Plant Biol, 2019. 50: p. 44-57. 111. Zhang, X. and Z. Mou, Extracellular pyridine nucleotides induce PR gene expression and disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Plant J, 2009. 57(2): p. 302-12. 112. Wang, C., et al., A lectin receptor kinase as a potential sensor for extracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide in Arabidopsis thaliana. Elife, 2017. 6. 113. Shiu, S.H. and A.B. Bleecker, Receptor-like kinases from Arabidopsis form a monophyletic gene family related to animal receptor kinases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2001. 98(19): p. 10763-8. 114. Luo, L., Plant cytokine or phytocytokine. Plant Signal Behav, 2012. 7(12): p. 1513-4. 115. Couto, D. and C. Zipfel, Regulation of pattern recognition receptor signalling in plants. Nat Rev Immunol, 2016. 16(9): p. 537-52. 116. Escocard de Azevedo Manhaes, A.M., et al., Plant plasma membrane-resident receptors: Surveillance for infections and coordination for growth and development. J Integr Plant Biol, 2021. 63(1): p. 79-101. 117. Hou, S., D. Liu, and P. He, Phytocytokines function as immunological modulators of plant immunity. Stress Biol, 2021. 1(1): p. 8. 118. Gully, K., et al., The SCOOP12 peptide regulates defense response and root elongation in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot, 2019. 70(4): p. 1349-1365. 119. Hou, S., et al., The Arabidopsis MIK2 receptor elicits immunity by sensing a conserved signature from phytocytokines and microbes. Nat Commun, 2021. 12(1): p. 5494. 120. Rhodes, J., et al., Perception of a divergent family of phytocytokines by the Arabidopsis receptor kinase MIK2. Nat Commun, 2021. 12(1): p. 705. 121. Pastor-Fernandez, J., et al., Small Signals Lead to Big Changes: The Potential of Peptide-Induced Resistance in Plants. J Fungi (Basel), 2023. 9(2). 122. Gibbs, G.M., K. Roelants, and M.K. O'Bryan, The CAP superfamily: cysteine-rich secretory proteins, antigen 5, and pathogenesis-related 1 proteins--roles in reproduction, cancer, and immune defense. Endocr Rev, 2008. 29(7): p. 865-97. 123. Chen, Y.L., et al., Quantitative peptidomics study reveals that a wound-induced peptide from PR-1 regulates immune signaling in tomato. Plant Cell, 2014. 26(10): p. 4135-48. 124. Chen, Y.L., et al., XCP1 cleaves Pathogenesis-related protein 1 into CAPE9 for systemic immunity in Arabidopsis. Nat Commun, 2023. 14(1): p. 4697. 125. Berger, S., A.K. Sinha, and T. Roitsch, Plant physiology meets phytopathology: plant primary metabolism and plant-pathogen interactions. J Exp Bot, 2007. 58(15-16): p. 4019-26. 126. Heuberger, A.L., et al., Evaluating plant immunity using mass spectrometry-based metabolomics workflows. Front Plant Sci, 2014. 5: p. 291. 127. Delledonne, M., et al., Nitric oxide functions as a signal in plant disease resistance. Nature, 1998. 394(6693): p. 585-8. 128. Gundlach, H., et al., Jasmonic acid is a signal transducer in elicitor-induced plant cell cultures. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1992. 89(6): p. 2389-93. 129. Ecker, J.R. and R.W. Davis, Plant defense genes are regulated by ethylene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1987. 84(15): p. 5202-6. 130. Torres, M.A., J.D. Jones, and J.L. Dangl, Reactive oxygen species signaling in response to pathogens. Plant Physiol, 2006. 141(2): p. 373-8. 131. Yang, Z., et al., Homoserine and asparagine are host signals that trigger in planta expression of a pathogenesis gene in Nectria haematococca. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2005. 102(11): p. 4197-202. 132. Rivas-San Vicente, M., G. Larios-Zarate, and J. Plasencia, Disruption of sphingolipid biosynthesis in Nicotiana benthamiana activates salicylic acid-dependent responses and compromises resistance to Alternaria alternata f. sp. lycopersici. Planta, 2013. 237(1): p. 121-36. 133. Ng, C.K., et al., Drought-induced guard cell signal transduction involves sphingosine-1-phosphate. Nature, 2001. 410(6828): p. 596-9. 134. Lorenzo, O., et al., ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR1 integrates signals from ethylene and jasmonate pathways in plant defense. Plant Cell, 2003. 15(1): p. 165-78. 135. Rojas, C.M., et al., Regulation of primary plant metabolism during plant-pathogen interactions and its contribution to plant defense. Front Plant Sci, 2014. 5: p. 17. 136. Dittrich, P. and K. Raschke, Malate metabolism in isolated epidermis of Commelina communis L. in relation to stomatal functioning. Planta, 1977. 134(1): p. 77-81. 137. Dixon, R.A., Natural products and plant disease resistance. Nature, 2001. 411(6839): p. 843-7. 138. Tetyuk, O., U.F. Benning, and S. Hoffmann-Benning, Collection and analysis of Arabidopsis phloem exudates using the EDTA-facilitated Method. J Vis Exp, 2013(80): p. e51111. 139. King, R.W. and J.A. Zeevaart, Enhancement of Phloem exudation from cut petioles by chelating agents. Plant Physiol, 1974. 53(1): p. 96-103. 140. Xu, Q., Y. Ren, and J. Liesche, Studying Phloem Loading with EDTA-Facilitated Phloem Exudate Collection and Analysis. Methods Mol Biol, 2019. 2014: p. 125-133. 141. Guelette, B.S., U.F. Benning, and S. Hoffmann-Benning, Identification of lipids and lipid-binding proteins in phloem exudates from Arabidopsis thaliana. J Exp Bot, 2012. 63(10): p. 3603-16. 142. Tsugawa, H., et al., A lipidome atlas in MS-DIAL 4. Nat Biotechnol, 2020. 38(10): p. 1159-1163. 143. Pang, Z., et al., MetaboAnalyst 6.0: towards a unified platform for metabolomics data processing, analysis and interpretation. Nucleic Acids Res, 2024. 52(W1): p. W398-W406. 144. Theodoridis, G.A., et al., Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry based global metabolite profiling: a review. Anal Chim Acta, 2012. 711: p. 7-16. 145. Spagou, K., et al., Hydrophilic interaction chromatography coupled to MS for metabonomic/metabolomic studies. J Sep Sci, 2010. 33(6-7): p. 716-27. 146. Djoumbou Feunang, Y., et al., ClassyFire: automated chemical classification with a comprehensive, computable taxonomy. J Cheminform, 2016. 8: p. 61. 147. Kanwal, H., et al., Effect of riboflavin on redox balance, osmolyte accumulation, methylglyoxal generation and nutrient acquisition in indian squash (Praecitrullus fistulosus L.) under chromium toxicity. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int, 2024. 31(14): p. 20881-20897. 148. Jiadkong, K., et al., Exogenous riboflavin (vitamin B2) application enhances salinity tolerance through the activation of its biosynthesis in rice seedlings under salinity stress. Plant Sci, 2024. 339: p. 111929. 149. Liu, W. and S.W. Park, 12-oxo-Phytodienoic Acid: A Fuse and/or Switch of Plant Growth and Defense Responses? Front Plant Sci, 2021. 12: p. 724079. 150. Kano, A., et al., D-Psicose induces upregulation of defense-related genes and resistance in rice against bacterial blight. J Plant Physiol, 2011. 168(15): p. 1852-7. 151. Wang, X., Y. Du, and D. Yu, Trehalose phosphate synthase 5-dependent trehalose metabolism modulates basal defense responses in Arabidopsis thaliana. J Integr Plant Biol, 2019. 61(4): p. 509-527. 152. Hassan, M.U., et al., Trehalose: a key player in plant growth regulation and tolerance to abiotic stresses. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2023. 42(8): p. 4935-4957. 153. Emerson, R. and B. Crandall, Use of flavonoid aldehydes as pesticides. 2002, Google Patents. 154. King, R. and J. Zeevaart, Enhancement of phloem exudation from cut petioles by chelating agents. Plant Physiology, 1974. 53(1): p. 96-103. 155. Chan, C., et al., STRESS INDUCED FACTOR 2 Regulates Arabidopsis Stomatal Immunity through Phosphorylation of the Anion Channel SLAC1. Plant Cell, 2020. 32(7): p. 2216-2236. 156. Li, Q., et al., N-hydroxypipecolic acid triggers systemic acquired resistance through extracellular NAD(P). Nat Commun, 2023. 14(1): p. 6848. 157. Dong, H. and S. Beer, Riboflavin induces disease resistance in plants by activating a novel signal transduction pathway. Phytopathology, 2000. 90(8): p. 801-811. 158. Namba, J., et al., AtDREB2G is involved in the regulation of riboflavin biosynthesis in response to low-temperature stress and abscisic acid treatment in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Sci, 2024. 347: p. 112196. 159. Boubakri, H., The role of ascorbic acid in plant–pathogen interactions. Ascorbic acid in plant growth, development and stress tolerance, 2017: p. 255-271. 160. De Britto, S., S.M. Joshi, and S. Jogaiah, Trehalose: A mycogenic cell wall elicitor elicit resistance against leaf spot disease of broccoli and acts as a plant growth regulator. Biotechnol Rep (Amst), 2021. 32: p. e00690. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96538 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 系統性後天抗性 (Systemic acquired resistance, SAR) 是植物在局部病原體感染後啟動的全株防禦反應，主要由水楊酸 (Salicylic acid, SA) 和致病蛋白一號 (Pathogenesis-related protein 1, PR1) 調控。然而，SAR中系統性信號的傳遞機制仍不明確。在之前的研究中，我們發現PR1會被酵素切割產生植物內生性胜肽AtCAPE9，AtCAPE9在由細菌鞭毛蛋白衍生胜肽flg22誘導的局部和系統免疫反應中發揮了關鍵調節作用。儘管AtCAPE9已被證明是SA信號途徑中的重要分子，但其在調控SAR中的下游機制仍不清楚。為了瞭解這一機制，我們透過液相層析串聯式質譜儀 (LC-MS/MS) 對經AtCAPE9處理的阿拉伯芥葉片和韌皮部滲出液進行了代謝體學分析。結果顯示，初級和次級代謝物均發生顯著變化，其中N-羥基哌啶酸 (N-hydroxypipecolic acid, NHP) 和核黃素 (Riboflavin) 在葉片和韌皮部滲出液中均顯著增加，表明其可能在局部和系統免疫中具有重要作用。進一步的功能研究證實，NHP在AtCAPE9誘導的免疫中是不可或缺的，因為缺乏將哌啶酸 (Pip) 轉化為NHP的黃素依賴單加氧酶1 (Flavin-dependent monooxygenase 1, FMO1) 的阿拉伯芥突變體無法表現AtCAPE9誘導的局部和系統免疫。此外，作為NHP信號下游的菸鹼醯胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(磷酸) [NAD(P)]對AtCAPE9誘導的氣孔免疫反應至關重要。核黃素同樣在促進局部和系統氣孔免疫反應中發揮了關鍵作用。綜合而言，我們的研究表明，NHP和riboflavin作為AtCAPE9的關鍵下游調節因子，調控了支撐SAR和氣孔免疫的代謝及免疫信號傳導。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Systemic acquired resistance (SAR) is a plant-wide defense response initiated by local pathogen infection, primarily mediated by salicylic acid (SA) and pathogenesis-related protein 1 (PR1). Our recent study identified AtCAPE9, a cytokine peptide derived from PR1, as a critical regulator of both local and systemic immune responses triggered by the bacterial flagellin-derived peptide flg22. While AtCAPE9 was shown to function as a key mediator in SA signaling, the metabolic pathways involved in its regulation of SAR remained unclear. To elucidate these pathways, we conducted a metabolomic analysis of Arabidopsis leaves and phloem exudates from the plants treated with AtCAPE9 using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). This analysis revealed significant alterations in primary and secondary metabolites, with N-hydroxypipecolic acid (NHP) and riboflavin emerging as key metabolites elevated in both leaves and phloem exudates. Functional studies confirmed the essential role of NHP in AtCAPE9-induced immunity, as Arabidopsis mutants deficient in flavin-dependent monooxygenase 1 (FMO1), deficient in NHP biosynthesis, failed to exhibit AtCAPE9-triggered local and systemic immune responses. Furthermore, we found that nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) [NAD(P)], a known downstream component of NHP signaling, is required for AtCAPE9-induced stomatal immunity. Riboflavin also played a pivotal role in promoting both local and systemic stomatal immune responses. These findings demonstrate that NHP and riboflavin acts as an downstream of AtCAPE9, orchestrating metabolic and immune signaling pathways that underpin SAR and stomatal immunity in Arabidopsis. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-19T16:25:17Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-19T16:25:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii Table of Contents v List of Figures viii List of Tables x 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Importance of Immune Systems in Plants 1 1.2 Overviews of Plant Immune Responses 1 1.3 Stomatal Immunity for Plant Defense 5 1.4 Systemic Acquired Resistance (SAR) 8 1.5 Small Molecular Signaling in SAR 10 1.5.1 Salicylic acid (SA) and Methyl salicylate (MeSA) 10 1.5.2 Glycerol-3-phosphate (G3P) 12 1.5.3 DEFECTIVE IN INDUCED RESISTANCE 1 (DIR1) protein 12 1.5.4 Azelaic acid (AzA) 13 1.5.5 Dehydroabietinal (DA) 14 1.5.6 Pipecolic acid (Pip) 14 1.5.7 N-Hydroxypipecolic acid (NHP) 15 1.5.8 Extracellular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (phosphate) [eNAD(P)] 15 1.6 Cytokines AtCAPE9 Involved in Plant Immune Responses 16 1.7 Role of Metabolome in Plant Defense Mechanisms 18 1.8 Propose of This Study 21 2. Material and Method 24 2.1 Chemicals and Reagents 24 2.2 Plant Material and Growth Conditions 24 2.3 Generation and Genotyping of T-DNA Insertion Lines 25 2.4 Metabolomics Analysis of Leaves and Phloem Exudates 26 2.4.1 Sample Preparation of Arabidopsis Leaves 26 2.4.2 Sample Preparation of Arabidopsis Phloem Exudates 27 2.4.3 LC-MS/MS Analysis 28 2.4.4 MS Data Process and Statistical Analysis 29 2.5 Local and Systemic Stomatal Aperture Assay 31 3. Result 33 3.1 Comprehensive Profiling of Metabolome Changes Induced by AtCAPE9 in Arabidopsis Leaves 33 3.2 Identification of Metabolites and Key Metabolic Pathways Regulated by AtCAPE9 36 3.3 Role of AtCAPE9-Induced Metabolites in Plant Immune Responses 37 3.4 Identification of Mobile Signals Induced by AtCAPE9 in Arabidopsis 39 3.4.1 Optimization of Phloem Exudate Collection Using EDTA in Arabidopsis 39 3.4.2 Metabolomic Profiling of AtCAPE9-Induced Metabolites in Phloem Exudates 41 3.5 Verification of NHP and Riboflavin as AtCAPE9-Induced Metabolites in Leaves and Phloem Exudates 42 3.6 Validation of NHP and Riboflavin as AtCAPE9-Induced Metabolites Involved in Local and Systemic Stomatal Immunity 45 3.6.1 NHP and Its Downstream Signals Essential for AtCAPE9-Mediated Local and Systemic Stomatal Immunity 45 3.6.2 Riboflavin-Induced Local and Systemic Stomatal Immunity Operates Independently of or Downstream to PR1 49 4. Discussion 51 5. Conclusion 54 6. References 96 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.title | 利用代謝體學探討由植物細胞激素AtCAPE9調控的免疫反應 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Metabolomics Perspective on the Plant Immunity Regulated by the Cytokine AtCAPE9 | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳仁治;徐駿森;陳禮弘 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jen-Chih Chen;Chun-Hua Hsu;Li-Hung Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 系統性後天抗性,致病蛋白一號,AtCAPE9,液相層析串聯式質譜儀,代謝體學,葉片,韌皮部滲出液,N-羥基哌啶酸,核黃素,菸鹼醯胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(磷酸),氣孔免疫反應, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | SAR,PR1,AtCAPE9,Arabidopsis,LC-MS/MS,Metabolomics,Leaves,Phloem exudates,NHP,Riboflavin,NAD(P),Stomatal immunity, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 105 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500346 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 生物科技研究所 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 生物科技研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 2.86 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。