請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96508完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 連韻文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yunn-Wen Lien | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 蔡嘉勳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Hsun Tsai | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-19T16:17:14Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2025-02-20 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2025-02-19 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2025-02-04 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 翁宛婷（2020）：〈探討短期動態身心覺察課程對國小教師內感覺覺察，心理韌性與壓力知覺的介入成效〉（未初版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣師範大學。
高泉豐（1994）：〈認知需求的概念與測量〉。《中華心理學刊》，1，1-20。 張仁和、林以正、黃金蘭（2011）：〈中文版止觀覺察注意量表之信效度分析〉。《測驗學刊專刊：正向心理特質的測量》，235-260。 許惟智（2020）：〈探討兩週身心中軸覺察練習對大學生情緒調節的成效及覺察傾向、工作記憶的中介角色〉（未初版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學。 連韻文（計畫主持人）（2019-2022）：《覺察是改變的開始？從正念的角度探討身體覺察對意識覺察、認知彈性與理性傾向的影響》。（計畫編號：MOST 108-2410-H-002-108-MY2）。國家科學及技術委員會補助研究計畫。國家科學與技術委員會。 連韻文、鄧善娟、任純慧、祁業榮（2019）：〈禮樂傳統最優意識經驗的進路： 雅樂舞身心功效初探〉。《應用心理學刊》，70，123-184。 Ackerman, R., & Thompson, V. A. (2017). Meta-reasoning: Monitoring and control of thinking and reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 607-617. Ask, K., & Granhag, P. A. (2005). Motivational sources of confirmation bias in criminal investigations: The need for cognitive closure. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 2(1), 43-63. Babo-Rebelo, M., Wolpert, N., Adam, C., Hasboun, D., & Tallon-Baudry, C. (2016). Is the cardiac monitoring function related to the self in both the default network and right anterior insula? Philosophical Transaction of the Royalty Society. Series B, Biological Science, 371. Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory. Science, 255(5044), 556-559. Ball, L. J., Thompson, V. A., & Stupple, E. J. (2017). Conflict and dual process theory: The case of belief bias. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (pp. 100-120). Routledge. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2003). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8(3), 338. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Damasio, A. R., & Lee, G. P. (1999). Different contributions of the human amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex to decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, 19(13), 5473-5481. Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997a). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275(5304), 1293-1295. Bechara, A., Tranel, D., Damasio, H., & Damasio, A. R. (1996). Failure to respond autonomically to anticipated future outcomes following damage to prefrontal cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 6(2), 215-225. Botvinick, M. M., Cohen, J. D., & Carter, C. S. (2004). Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: An update. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(12), 539-546. Brener, J., & Kluvitse, C. (1988). Heartbeat detection: Judgments of the simultaneity of external stimuli and heartbeats. Psychophysiology, 25, 554–561. Brener, J., Liu, X., & Ring, C. (1993). A method of constant stimuli for examining heartbeat detection: Comparison with the Brener-Kluvitse and Whitehead methods. Psychophysiology, 30, 657–665. Brewer, R., Cook, R., & Bird, G. (2016). Alexithymia: A general deficit of interoception. Royal Society Open Science, 3(10), 150664. Bronstein, M. V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D. G., & Cannon, T. D. (2019). Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 8(1), 108-117. Brown, K. W., & Ryan, R. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822. Burgess, D. J., Beach, M. C., & Saha, S. (2017). Mindfulness practice: A promising approach to reducing the effects of clinician implicit bias on patients. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(2), 372-376. Burgess, G. C., Gray, J. R., Conway, A. R., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 674. Burgess, G. C., Gray, J. R., Conway, A. R., & Braver, T. S. (2011). Neural mechanisms of interference control underlie the relationship between fluid intelligence and working memory span. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 674. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116. Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307. Cameron, O. G. (2002). Visceral sensory neuroscience: Interoception. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. Cattell, R. B. (1963). Theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence: A critical experiment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 54(1), 1–22. Conway, A. R., Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(12), 547-552. Copeland, D., & Radvansky, G. (2004). Working memory and syllogistic reasoning. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(8), 1437-1457. Craig, A. D. (2002). How do you feel? Interoception: The sense of the physiologicalcondition of the body, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3 (8), 655-666. Craig, A. D. (2004). Human feelings: Why are some more aware than others? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(6), 239–241. Craig, A. D. (2005). Forebrain emotional asymmetry: A neuroanatomical basis? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 566 –571. Craig, A. D. (2009). How do you feel - now? The anterior insula and human awareness, Nature Review Neuroscience, 10(1), 59–70. Craig, A. D. (2015). How do you feel? : An interoceptive moment with your neurobiological self. Princeton University Press. Critchley, H. D., & Harrison, N. A. (2013). Visceral influences on brain and behavior. Neuron, 77, 624 – 638. Critchley, H., Wiens, S., Rotshtein, P., Ohman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Natural Neuroscience, 7, 189–195. Damasio, A. R. (1996). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 351(1346), 1413-1420. Dasgupta, I., Lampinen, A. K., Chan, S. C., Creswell, A., Kumaran, D., McClelland, J. L., & Hill, F. (2022). Language models show human-like content effects on reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07051. de Chantal, P. L., Newman, I. R., Thompson, V., & Markovits, H. (2020). Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus. Memory & Cognition, 48, 655-671. de Chantal, P. L., Newman, I. R., Thompson, V., & Markovits, H. (2020). Who resists belief-biased inferences? The role of individual differences in reasoning strategies, working memory, and attentional focus. Memory & Cognition, 48, 655-671. De Neys, W. (2012). Bias and conflict: A case for logical intuitions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1), 28-38. De Neys, W., Moyens, E., & Vansteenwegen, D. (2010). Feeling we’re biased: Autonomic arousal and reasoning conflict. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 10(2), 208-216. De Neys, W., Schaeken, W., & d'Ydewalle, G. (2005). Working memory and everyday conditional reasoning: Retrieval and inhibition of stored counterexamples. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 349-381. Desmedt, O., Corneille, O., Luminet, O., Murphy, J., Bird, G., & Maurage, P. (2020). Contribution of time estimation and knowledge to heartbeat counting task performance under original and adapted instructions. Biological Psychology, 154, 107904. Desmedt, O., Heeren, A., Corneille, O., & Luminet, O. (2022). What do measures of self-report interoception measure? Insights from a systematic review, latent factor analysis, and network approach. Biological Psychology, 169, 108289. Desmedt, O., Luminet, O., & Corneille, O. (2018). The heartbeat counting task largely involves non-interoceptive processes: Evidence from both the original and an adapted counting task. Biological Psychology, 138, 185-188. Dickhäuser, O., Reinhard, M. A., Diener, C., & Bertrams, A. (2009). How need for cognition affects the processing of achievement-related information. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 283-287. Ding, D., Chen, Y., Lai, J., Chen, X., Han, M., & Zhang, X. (2020). Belief bias effect in older adults: Roles of working memory and need for cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2940. Ding, D., Chen, Y., Lai, J., Chen, X., Han, M., & Zhang, X. (2020). Belief bias effect in older adults: Roles of working memory and need for cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2940. Dunn, B. D., Galton, H. C., Morgan, R., Evans, D., Oliver, C., & Meyer, M. (2010). Listening to your heart. How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychological Science. 21 (12), 1835–1844. Dunn, B. D., Stefanovitch, I., Evans, D., Oliver, C., Hawkins, A., & Dalgleish, T. (2010). Can you feel the beat? Interoceptive awareness is an interactive function of anxiety-and depression-specific symptom dimensions. Behaviour research and Therapy, 48(11), 1133-1138. Eggart, M., & Valdes-Stauber, J. (2021). Can changes in multidimensional self-reported interoception be considered as outcome predictors in severely depressed patients? A moderation and mediation analysis. Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 141, 110331. Evans, J. S. B. (1984). Heuristic and analytic processes in reasoning. British Journal of Psychology, 75(4), 451-468. Evans, J. S. B. (1989). Bias in human reasoning: Causes and consequences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Evans, J. S. B. (2007). On the resolution of conflict in dual process theories of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 13(4), 321-339. Evans, J. S. B. (2008). Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 255-278. Evans, J. S. B. (2011). Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications. Developmental Review, 31(2-3), 86-102. Evans, J. S. B. (2017). Thinking and reasoning: A very short introduction (Vol. 533). Oxford University Press. Evans, J. S. B., & Curtis-Holmes, J. (2005). Rapid responding increases belief bias: Evidence for the dual-process theory of reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 382-389. Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223-241. Evans, J. S. B., Barston, J. L., & Pollard, P. (1983). On the conflict between logic and belief in syllogistic reasoning. Memory & Cognition, 11(3), 295-306. Fjell, A. M., Westlye, L. T., Amlien, I., Tamnes, C. K., Grydeland, H., Engvig, A., ... & Walhovd, K. B. (2015). High-expanding cortical regions in human development and evolution are related to higher intellectual abilities. Cerebral Cortex, 25(1), 26-34. Frey, M. C., & Detterman, D. K. (2004). Scholastic assessment or g? The relationship between the scholastic assessment test and general cognitive ability. Psychological Science, 15(6), 373-378. Furnham, A., & Thorne, J. D. (2013). Need for cognition: Its dimensionality and personality and intelligence correlates. Journal of Individual Differences, 34(4), 230–240. Füstös, J., Gramann, K., Herbert, B. M., & Pollatos, O. (2013). On the embodiment ofemotion regulation: Interoceptive awareness facilitates reappraisal. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(8), 911–917. Gabbard, C., Lee, J., & Caçola, P. (2013). Role of working memory in transformation of visual and motor representations for use in mental simulation. Cognitive Neuroscience, 4(3-4), 210-216. Garfinkel, S. N., & Critchley, H. D. (2013). Interoception, emotion and brain: new insights link internal physiology to social behaviour. Commentary on: “Anterior insular cortex mediates bodily sensibility and social anxiety” by Terasawa et al. (2012). Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(3), 231-234. Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Striking a blow for sanity in theories of rationality. In M. Augier & J. G. March (Eds.), Models of a man: Essays in memory of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 389–409). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Giovannoli, J. (2000). The biology of belief: how our biology biases our beliefs and perceptions. Rosetta Press, Inc. Hafenbrack, A. C., Kinias, Z., & Barsade, S. G. (2014). Debiasing the mind through meditation: Mindfulness and the sunk-cost bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 369-376. Hafenbrack, A. C., Kinias, Z., & Barsade, S. G. (2014). Debiasing the mind through meditation: Mindfulness and the sunk-cost bias. Psychological Science, 25(2), 369-376. Haselton, M. G., Bryant, G. A., Wilke, A., Frederick, D. A., Galperin, A., Frankenhuis, W. E., & Moore, T. (2009). Adaptive rationality: An evolutionary perspective on cognitive bias. Social Cognition, 27(5), 733-763. Henderson, D. A., Denison, D. R. (1989). Stepwise Regression in social andpsychological research. Psychological Reports, 64(1). 251-257. Jaeggi, S. M., Buschkuehl, M., Jonides, J., & Perrig, W. J. (2008). Improving fluid intelligence with training on working memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(19), 6829-6833. Jen, C. H., & Lien, Y. W. (2010). What is the source of cultural differences?—Examining the influence of thinking style on the attribution process. Acta Psychologica, 133(2), 154-162. Johnson‐Laird, P. N., Legrenzi, P., & Legrenzi, M. S. (1972). Reasoning and a sense of reality. British Journal of Psychology, 63(3), 395-400. Joshi, S. A., Aupperle, R. L., & Khalsa, S. S. (2023). Interoception in fear learning and posttraumatic stress disorder. Focus, 21(3), 266-277. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Kang, Y., Gruber, J., & Gray, J. R. (2013). Mindfulness and deautomatization. Emotion Review, 5(2), 192-201. Khalsa, S. S., Adolphs, R., Cameron, O. G., Critchley, H. D., Davenport, P. W.,Feinstein, J. S., & Meuret, A. E. (2018). Interoception and mental health: A roadmap. Biological Psychiatry: Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuroimaging, 3, 501–513. Klauer, K. C., Musch, J., & Naumer, B. (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review, 107(4), 852. Löken, L. S., Wessberg, J., Morrison, I., McGlone, F., & Olausson, H. (2009). Coding of pleasant touch by unmyelinated afferents in humans. Nature Neuroscience, 12, 547–548. Markovits, H., & Nantel, G. (1989). The belief-bias effect in the production and evaluation of logical conclusions. Memory & Cognition, 17(1), 11-17. Meessen, J., Mainz, V., Gauggel, S., Volz-Sidiropoulou, E., Sütterlin, S., & Forkmann, T. (2016). The relationship between interoception and metacognition: A pilot study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 30(2), 76. Mehling, W. E., Acree, M., Stewart, A., Silas, J., & Jones, A. (2018). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2 (MAIA-2). PloS One, 13(12). Mehling, W. E., Gopisetty, V., Daubenmier, J., Price, C. J., Hecht, F. M., & Stewart, A. (2009). Body awareness: construct and self-report measures. PloS One, 4(5), e5614. Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PloS One, 7(11), e48230. Mehling, W. E., Price, C., Daubenmier, J. J., Acree, M., Bartmess, E., & Stewart, A. (2012). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness (MAIA). PloS One, 7(11). Menon, V., Uddin, L.Q. (2010). Saliency, switching, attention and control: a network model of insula function. Brain Structure and Function, 214, 655–667. Mitchell, J. P., Heatherton, T. F., Kelley, W. M., Wyland, C. L., Wegner, D. M., & Macrae, C. N. (2007). Separating sustained from transient aspects of cognitive control during thought suppression. Psychological Science, 18(4), 292-297. Murphy, J., Geary, H., Millgate, E., Catmur, C., & Bird, G. (2018). Direct and indirect effects of age on interoceptive accuracy and awareness across the adult lifespan. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25, 1193-1202. Newman, I. R., Gibb, M., & Thompson, V. A. (2017). Rule-based reasoning is fast and belief-based reasoning can be slow: Challenging current explanations of belief-bias and base-rate neglect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(7), 1154. Niven, J. E., & Laughlin, S. B. (2008). Energy limitation as a selective pressure on the evolution of sensory systems. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211(11), 1792-1804. Norenzayan, A., Smith, E. E., Kim, B. J., & Nisbett, R. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26(5), 653-684. Oakhill, J. V., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1985). The effects of belief on the spontaneous production of syllogistic conclusions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 37(4), 553-569. Ortner, C. N., Kilner, S. J., & Zelazo, P. D. (2007). Mindfulness meditation and reduced emotional interference on a cognitive task. Motivation and Emotion, 31, 271-283. Paulus, M. P., & Stein, M. B. (2010). Interoception in anxiety and depression. Brain Structure and Function, 214, 451-463. Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195-203. Pinna, T., & Edwards, D. J. (2020). A Systematic Review of Associations BetweenInteroception, Vagal Tone, and Emotional Regulation: Potential Applications for Mental Health, Wellbeing, Psychological Flexibility, and Chronic Conditions. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1792. Porges, S. (1993). Body perception questionnaire. Laboratory of Developmental Assessment: University of Maryland. Qiu, T. T., Nielsen, E., Guimaraes, E., & Minda, J. P. (2022). Trait, but not state mindfulness improves resistance to cognitive biases. PsyArXiv. Quach, D., Mano, K. E. J., & Alexander, K. (2016). A randomized controlled trial examining the effect of mindfulness meditation on working memory capacity in adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 58(5), 489-496. Quigley, K. S., Kanoski, S., Grill, W. M., Barrett, L. F., & Tsakiris, M. (2021). Functions of interoception: From energy regulation to experience of the self. Trends in Neurosciences, 44(1), 29-38. R Core Team. (2013). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Raoelison, M., Boissin, E., Borst, G., & De Neys, W. (2021). From slow to fast logic: The development of logical intuitions. Thinking & Reasoning, 27(4), 599-622. Raoelison, M., Thompson, V. A., & De Neys, W. (2020). The smart intuitor: Cognitive capacity predicts intuitive rather than deliberate thinking. Cognition, 204, 104381. Revlin, R., Leirer, V., Yopp, H., & Yopp, R. (1980). The belief-bias effect in formal reasoning: The influence of knowledge on logic. Memory & Cognition, 8, 584-592. Richter, F., & Ibanez, A. (2021). Time is body: Multimodal evidence of crosstalk between interoception and time estimation. Biological Psychology. 159. Robinson, E., Foote, G., Smith, J., Higgs, S., & Jones, A. (2021). Interoception and obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between interoception and BMI. International Journal of Obesity, 45(12), 2515-2526. Robison, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2017). Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1471-1484. Robison, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2017). Individual differences in working memory capacity and resistance to belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(8), 1471-1484. Sá, W. C., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 497. Sá, W. C., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (1999). The domain specificity and generality of belief bias: Searching for a generalizable critical thinking skill. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 497. Schandry, R. (1981). Heart beat perception and emotional experience. Psychophysiology, 18(4), 483–488. Schubert, A., Ferreira, M. B., Mata, A., & Riemenschneider, B. (2021). A diffusion model analysis of belief bias: Different cognitive mechanisms explain how cognitive abilities and thinking styles contribute to conflict resolution in reasoning. Cognition, 211, 104629. Sherrington, C. S. (2023). The integrative action of the nervous system. In R. Boddice (Ed.), Scientific and medical knowledge production, 1796-1918 (pp. 217-253). Routledge. Shields, S. A., Mallory, M. E., & Simon, A. (1989). The body awareness questionnaire: reliability and validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 53(4), 802-815. Singer, T., Critchley, H. D., & Preuschoff, K. (2009). A common role of insula in feelings, empathy and uncertainty. Trends in Cognition Science. 13 (8), 334–340. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(2), 108-131. Sridharan, D., Levitin, D. J., & Menon, V. (2008). A critical role for the right fronto-insular cortex in switching between central-executive and default-mode networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(34), 12569-12574. Stanovich, K. E. (2004). The robot’s rebellion: Finding meaning the age of Darwin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Stanovich, K. E. (2006). Fluid intelligence as cognitive decoupling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 139-140. Stanovich, K. E. (2009a). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In J. St. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Dual-process theory and the great rationality debate. Rationality and the Reflective Mind, 3-28. Stanovich, K. E. (2011). Rationality and the reflective mind. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Stanovich, K. E. (2018). Miserliness in human cognition: The interaction of detection, override and mindware. Thinking & Reasoning, 24(4), 423-444. Stanovich, K. E., & Stanovich, P. J. (2010). A framework for critical thinking, rational thinking, and intelligence. In Sternberg, R. J., & Preiss, D. D. (Eds.), Innovations in educational psychology: Perspectives on learning, teaching, and human development. (pp. 195-237). Springer Pub Co. Stanovich, K. E., & Toplak, M. E. (2012). Defining features versus incidental correlates of type 1 and type 2 processing. Mind & Society, 11, 3–13. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1997). Reasoning independently of prior belief and individual differences in actively open-minded thinking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(2), 342. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 672. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 672. Stupple, E. J., Ball, L. J., Evans, J. S. B., & Kamal-Smith, E. (2011). When logic and belief collide: Individual differences in reasoning times support a selective processing model. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 931-941. Stupple, E. J., Ball, L. J., Evans, J. S. B., & Kamal-Smith, E. (2011). When logic and belief collide: Individual differences in reasoning times support a selective processing model. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 931-941. Teng, B., Wang, D., Su, C., Zhou, H., Wang, T., Mehling, W. E., & Hu, Y. (2022). The multidimensional assessment of interoceptive awareness, version 2: Translation and psychometric properties of the Chinese version. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 13. Teng, S. C., & Lien, Y. W. (2016). What Confucius practiced is good for your mind: Examining the effect of a contemplative practice in Confucian tradition on executive functions. Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 204-215. Thompson, V. A., & Johnson, S. C. (2014). Conflict, metacognition, and analytic thinking. Thinking & Reasoning, 20(2), 215-244. Thompson, V. A., Evans, J. S. B. T., & Frankish, K. (2009). Dual process theories: A metacognitive perspective. Ariel, 137, 51-43. Thompson, V. A., Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., & Evans, J. S. B. (2018). Do smart people have better intuitions?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(7), 945. Thompson, V. A., Pennycook, G., Trippas, D., & Evans, J. S. B. (2018). Do smart people have better intuitions?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 147(7), 945. Thompson, V. A., Turner, J. A. P., & Pennycook, G. (2011). Intuition, reason, and metacognition. Cognitive Psychology, 63(3), 107-140. Torrens, D. (1999). Individual differences and the belief bias effect: Mental models, logical necessity, and abstract reasoning. Thinking & Reasoning, 5(1), 1-28. Trippas, D., Handley, S. J., & Verde, M. F. (2013). The SDT model of belief bias: complexity, time, and cognitive ability mediate the effects of believability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(5), 1393. Trippas, D., Pennycook, G., Verde, M. F., & Handley, S. J. (2015). Better but still biased: Analytic cognitive style and belief bias. Thinking & Reasoning, 21(4), 431-445. Trippas, D., Verde, M. F., & Handley, S. J. (2014). Using forced choice to test belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Cognition, 133(3), 586-600. Tveit, N. (2023). Exploring the relationship between feeling of rightness and recall: A study challenging dual process theory [Master's thesis, UiT Norges arktiske universitet]. UiT Munin. Umeda, S., Tochizawa, S., Shibata, M., & Terasawa, Y. (2016). Prospective memory mediated by interoceptive accuracy: a psychophysiological approach. Philosophical Transaction of the Royalty Society in London. Series B, Biological Science, 371 (1708). Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104. Unsworth, N., Fukuda, K., Awh, E., & Vogel, E. K. (2014). Working memory and fluid intelligence: Capacity, attention control, and secondary memory retrieval. Cognitive Psychology, 71, 1-26. Unsworth, S. J., & Medin, D. L. (2005). Cultural differences in belief bias associated with deductive reasoning?. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 525-529. Van der Does, A. W., Antony, M. M., Ehlers, A., & Barsky, A. J. (2000). Heartbeat perception in panic disorder: a reanalysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 38(1), 47-62. Wang, S., & Thompson, V. (2019). Fluency and feeling of rightness: The effect of anchoring and models. Psihologijske Teme, 28(1), 37-72. Wang, X., Wu, Q., Egan, L., Gu, X., Liu, P., Gu, H., Yang, Y., Luo, J., Wu, Y., Gao, Z., & Fan, J. (2019). Anterior insular cortex plays a critical role in interoceptive attention. eLife, 8, e42265. Wason, P. C., & Evans, J. S. B. (1974). Dual processes in reasoning?. Cognition, 3(2), 141-154. Wason, P. C., & Shapiro, D. (1971). Natural and contrived experience in a reasoning problem. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23(1), 63-71. Werner, N.S., Peres, I., Duschek, S., & Schandry, R. (2010). Implicit memory foremotional words is modulated by cardiac perception. Biological Psychology. 85 (3), 370–376. West, R. F., Toplak, M. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (2008). Heuristics and biases as measures of critical thinking: Associations with cognitive ability and thinking dispositions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 930. Wilson, L. B., Andrew, D., & Craig, A. D. (2002). Activation of spinobulbar lamina I neurons by static muscle contraction. Journal of Neurophysiology, 87, 1641–1645. Zaki, J., Davis, J. I., & Ochsner, K. N. (2012). Overlapping activity in anterior insula during interoception and emotional experience. NeuroImage, 62(1), 493–499. Zollars, I., Poirier, T. I., & Pailden, J. (2019). Effects of mindfulness meditation on mindfulness, mental well-being, and perceived stress. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(10), 1022-1028. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96508 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 當人們依循自身信念，而非根據邏輯規則來判斷一個論證是否有效時，就可能產生信念偏誤效應（the belief bias effect）。過去關於信念偏誤的個體差異取向研究偏重於檢驗個人認知能力與理性思考傾向等面向的影響，然而各變項的影響尚未有定論。本論文則在認知相關因子（邏輯能力、工作記憶廣度、認知需求傾向與專注當下傾向）外，更首度納入與訊息衝突偵測有關的內感覺覺察能力或傾向（以心跳偵測作業與自陳式多向度內感覺覺察量表測量之），更全面性地檢驗影響個體信念偏誤程度的個別差異因素。信念偏誤程度則以個體在三段論證作業中衝突題（邏輯效度與結論可信度不一致）與一致題正確率的差異來代表。結果首度發現內感覺覺察度較高，或自評對自身身體感知較為信任或感到安適者，在論證無效的題目上有較低的信念偏誤程度。反之，自評愈能覺察到身體正、負向與中性感受者，信念偏誤程度愈高。此外，邏輯能力愈強，愈能抵抗信念對邏輯判斷的影響；而工作記憶廣度僅在無效題上，對高邏輯能力者有所幫助。不同面向的內感覺對信念偏誤不同的影響與可能的機制，以及上述發現在理論與實務上的意涵將在論文內討論。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The belief bias effect occurs when people's judgments about the validity of an argument are influenced more by their prior beliefs than by logical rules. Previous studies on individual differences in belief bias have primarily focused on one’s cognitive ability or rational thinking disposition. This study expands on these research by taking interoception into consideration, in addition to cognitive factors like logical reasoning ability, working memory capacity, the tendency of need for cognition and mindfulness tendency. We found that individuals with higher interoceptive awareness, or those with more trust in their bodies, were less susceptible to belief bias, especially when evaluating invalid arguments. However, those who are aware of their body sensations are more likely to be interfered with by their beliefs when belief and logic collide. Furthermore, logical reasoning ability plays a significant role in resisting belief bias, while working memory capacity does not have any effect. The implications of these findings for understanding and addressing belief bias are discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2025-02-19T16:17:14Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2025-02-19T16:17:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 致謝 i
中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 表次 vii 圖次 viii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 信念偏誤效應與其影響因素 2 第二節 為何會出現信念偏誤效應？理論回顧 4 第三節 內感覺在推理上的可能角色 13 第四節 研究概述 19 第二章 方法 23 第一節 參與者 23 第二節 實驗設計與程序 23 第三節 測驗與實驗材料 24 第三章 結果 32 第一節 資料分析 32 第二節 描述統計與相關 33 第三節 影響個體信念偏誤程度的預測變項：迴歸分析 38 第四章 討論 46 第一節 信念偏誤程度與認知能力以及第二類歷程的關係 46 第二節 不同向度內感覺覺察對信念偏誤程度的可能影響 49 第三節 研究貢獻與限制 52 參考文獻 55 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 信念偏誤 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 理性思考傾向 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 內感覺 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 邏輯判斷 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | belief bias | en |
| dc.subject | logical reasoning | en |
| dc.subject | body awareness | en |
| dc.subject | rational thinking disposition | en |
| dc.subject | interoception | en |
| dc.title | 內感覺、認知能力與理性思考傾向對推理作業中信念偏誤程度的影響：一個個別差異取向研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effects of Interoception, Cognitive Ability and Rational Thinking Disposition on Belief Bias Effect in a Reasoning Task: An Individual Differences Approach | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 楊立行;顏妙璇 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Lee-Xieng Yang;Miao-Hsuan Yen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 信念偏誤,內感覺,邏輯判斷,理性思考傾向, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | belief bias,interoception,logical reasoning,rational thinking disposition,body awareness, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 71 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202500378 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2025-02-05 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2025-02-20 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 2.48 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。