請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96299完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林正芳 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Cheng-Fang Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 陳樸 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | PU CHEN | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-24T16:14:05Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-12-25 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-12-24 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-12-09 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Albuquerque, R., Koskinen, Y., Yang, S., & Zhang, C. (2020). Resiliency of environmental and social stocks: An analysis of the exogenous COVID-19 market crash. The Review of Corporate Finance Studies, 9(3), 593-621.
Amel-Zadeh, A., & Serafeim, G. (2018). Why and how investors use ESG information: Evidence from a global survey. Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), 87-103. Atz, U., Liu, Z., Bruno, C., & Van Holt, T. (2021). Does sustainability generate better financial performance? Review, meta-analysis, and propositions. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 1-35. Balafoutis, A., Beck, B., Fountas, S., Vangeyte, J., Wal, T. V. D., Soto, I., ... & Eory, V. (2017). Precision agriculture technologies positively contributing to GHG emissions mitigation, farm productivity and economics. Sustainability, 9(8), 1339. Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315-1344. Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Brotherton, M. C. (2019). Assessing and improving the quality of sustainability reports: The auditors' perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(3), 703-721. Bringezu, S., O'Brien, M., & Schütz, H. (2014). Beyond biofuels: Assessing global land use for domestic consumption of biomass: A conceptual and empirical contribution to sustainable management of global resources. Land Use Policy, 29(1), 224-232. Buallay, A. (2019). Is sustainability reporting (ESG) associated with performance? Evidence from the European banking sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 30(1), 98-115. Busco, C., Consolandi, C., Eccles, R. G., & Sofra, E. (2020). A preliminary analysis of SASB reporting: Disclosure topics, financial relevance, and the financial intensity of ESG materiality. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 32(2), 117-125. Campos, L. M., de Melo Heizen, D. A., Verdinelli, M. A., & Miguel, P. A. C. (2015). Environmental performance indicators: A study on ISO 14001 certified companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 99, 286-296. Clune, S., Crossin, E., & Verghese, K. (2017). Systematic review of greenhouse gas emissions for different fresh food categories. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 766-783. Consolandi, C., Phadke, H., Hawley, J., & Eccles, R. G. (2020). Material ESG outcomes and SDG externalities: Evaluating the health care sector's contribution to the SDGs. Organization & Environment, 33(4), 511-533. Crippa, M., Solazzo, E., Guizzardi, D., Monforti-Ferrario, F., Tubiello, F. N., & Leip, A. (2021). Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions. Nature Food, 2(3), 198-209. Demers, E., Hendrikse, J., Joos, P., & Lev, B. (2021). ESG didn't immunize stocks during the COVID-19 crisis, but investments in intangible assets did. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 48(3-4), 433-462. D'Odorico, P., Davis, K. F., Rosa, L., Carr, J. A., Chiarelli, D., Dell'Angelo, J., & Rulli, M. C. (2018). The global food-energy-water nexus. Reviews of Geophysics, 56(3), 456-531. Drempetic, S., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2020). The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(2), 333-360. Eccles, R. G., & Klimenko, S. (2019). The investor revolution. Harvard Business Review, 97(3), 106-116. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857. Edmans, A. (2011). Does the stock market fully value intangibles? Employee satisfaction and equity prices. Journal of Financial Economics, 101(3), 621-640. Esty, D. C., & Winston, A. S. (2009). Green to gold: How smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. Yale University Press. Ewing, B. R., Hawkins, T. R., Wiedmann, T. O., Galli, A., Ercin, A. E., Weinzettel, J., & Steen-Olsen, K. (2012). Integrating ecological and water footprint accounting in a multi-regional input–output framework. Ecological Indicators, 23, 1-8. FAO. (2011). Global food losses and food waste – Extent, causes and prevention. Rome: FAO. Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45-64. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284. Flammer, C., & Bansal, P. (2017). Does a long‐term orientation create value? Evidence from a regression discontinuity. Strategic Management Journal, 38(9), 1827-1847. Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233. Gabel, V. M., Meier, M. S., Köpke, U., & Stolze, M. (2016). The challenges of including impacts on biodiversity in agricultural life cycle assessments. Journal of Environmental Management, 181, 249-260. Gan, Y., Liang, C., Hamel, C., Cutforth, H., & Wang, H. (2017). Strategies for reducing the carbon footprint of field crops for semiarid areas. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 31(4), 643-656. García-Sánchez, I. M., & Noguera-Gámez, L. (2017). Integrated information and the cost of capital. International Business Review, 26(5), 959-975. Giese, G., Lee, L. E., Melas, D., Nagy, Z., & Nishikawa, L. (2019). Foundations of ESG investing: How ESG affects equity valuation, risk, and performance. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 45(5), 69-83. Hart, S. L., & Ahuja, G. (1996). Does it pay to be green? An empirical examination of the relationship between emission reduction and firm performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 5(1), 30-37. Hartmann, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the food sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(3), 297-324. Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. The Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789-2837. Hellweg, S., & Milà i Canals, L. (2014). Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science, 344(6188), 1109-1113. Hoekstra, A. Y., & Wiedmann, T. O. (2014). Humanity's unsustainable environmental footprint. Science, 344(6188), 1114-1117. Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications, 38(11), 14336-14345. Jackson, G., Bartosch, J., Avetisyan, E., Kinderman, D., & Knudsen, J. S. (2020). Mandatory non-financial disclosure and its influence on CSR: An international comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 162(2), 323-342. Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., ... & Law, K. L. (2015). Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768-771. Jiang, W., Martek, I., Hosseini, M. R., Tamošaitienė, J., & Chen, C. (2018). Foreign infrastructure investment in developing countries: A dynamic panel data model of political risk impacts. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 25(2), 134-167. Jurgilevich, A., Birge, T., Kentala-Lehtonen, J., Korhonen-Kurki, K., Pietikäinen, J., Saikku, L., & Schösler, H. (2016). Transition towards circular economy in the food system. Sustainability, 8(1), 69. Kehoe, L., Romero-Muñoz, A., Polaina, E., Estes, L., Kreft, H., & Kuemmerle, T. (2017). Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(8), 1129-1135. Kell, G. (2018). The remarkable rise of ESG. Forbes. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/georgkell/2018/07/11/the-remarkable-rise-of-esg/ Khalil, N., Husin, H. N., Mahat, N., & Nasir, N. (2016). Sustainable environment: issues and solutions from the perspective of facility managers. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 234, 19-28. Khan, M., Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724. KPMG. (2020). The KPMG Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2020. KPMG International. Manning, L. (2018). Triangulation: Effective verification of food safety and quality management systems and associated organisational culture. Worldwide Hospitality and Tourism Themes, 10(3), 297-312. Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Cavallaro, F., & Khalifah, Z. (2016). Sustainable and renewable energy: An overview of the application of multiple criteria decision making techniques and approaches. Sustainability, 7(10), Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(5), 1577-1600. Mekonnen, M. M., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2012). A global assessment of the water footprint of farm animal products. Ecosystems, 15(3), 401-415. MSCI. (2021). MSCI ESG Industry Materiality Map. MSCI Inc. Nordström, E. M., Eriksson, L. O., & Öhman, K. (2012). Integrating multiple criteria decision analysis in participatory forest planning: Experience from a case study in northern Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 12(8), 562-574. Notarnicola, B., Sala, S., Anton, A., McLaren, S. J., Saouter, E., & Sonesson, U. (2017). The role of life cycle assessment in supporting sustainable agri-food systems: A review of the challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 399-409. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62-77. Roy, P., Nei, D., Orikasa, T., Xu, Q., Okadome, H., Nakamura, N., & Shiina, T. (2009). A review of life cycle assessment (LCA) on some food products. Journal of Food Engineering, 90(1), 1-10. Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1), 83-98. Sassen, R., Hinze, A. K., & Hardeck, I. (2016). Impact of ESG factors on firm risk in Europe. Journal of Business Economics, 86(8), 867-904. Schaltegger, S., Lüdeke-Freund, F., & Hansen, E. G. (2012). Business cases for sustainability: The role of business model innovation for corporate sustainability. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 6(2), 95-119. Shen, L., Ochoa, J. J., Shah, M. N., & Zhang, X. (2013). The application of urban sustainability indicators–A comparison between various practices. Habitat International, 35(1), 17-29. Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O'Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2018). Social life cycle assessment indices and indicators to monitor the social implications of wood-based products. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4074-4084. Song, M., Cen, L., Zheng, Z., Fisher, R., Liang, X., Wang, Y., & Huisingh, D. (2017). How would big data support societal development and environmental sustainability? Insights and practices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 489-500. Springmann, M., Clark, M., Mason-D'Croz, D., Wiebe, K., Bodirsky, B. L., Lassaletta, L., ... & Willett, W. (2018). Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature, 562(7728), 519-525. Tasca, A. L., Nessi, S., & Rigamonti, L. (2017). Environmental sustainability of agri-food supply chains: An LCA comparison between two alternative forms of production and distribution of endive in northern Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 140, 725-741. Teles, C. D., Ribeiro, J. L. D., Tinoco, M. A. C., & Ten Caten, C. S. (2018). Characterization of the adoption of environmental management practices in large Brazilian companies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 186, 645-653. Tendall, D. M., Joerin, J., Kopainsky, B., Edwards, P., Shreck, A., Le, Q. B., & Six, J. (2015). Food system resilience: Defining the concept. Global Food Security, 6, 17-23. UN PRI. (2006). Principles for Responsible Investment. Retrieved from https://www.unpri.org/pri/about-the-pri Willett, W., Rockström, J., Loken, B., Springmann, M., Lang, T., Vermeulen, S., ... & Murray, C. J. (2019). Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. The Lancet, 393(10170), 447-492. World Economic Forum. (2020). The Global Risks Report 2020. World Economic Forum. Wu, S. R., Shao, C., & Chen, J. (2021). Approaches on the screening and evaluation system of green food enterprises in Taiwan. Sustainability, 13(3), 1382. Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. Yoon, B., Lee, J. H., & Byun, R. (2018). Does ESG performance enhance firm value? Evidence from Korea. Sustainability, 10(10), 3635. Zhou, H., Yang, Y., Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2018). Data envelopment analysis application in sustainability: The origins, development and future directions. European Journal of Operational Research, 264(1), 1-16. 水利署（2021）。110年台灣水資源開發與利用年報。經濟部水利署。 台灣證券交易所（2015）。公司治理評鑑系統。台灣證券交易所。 朱民芮、蔡維哲、楊曉文、鄞齊（2021）。以基本面分析強化社會責任投資績效。證券市場發展季刊，33(3)，1-42。 李珍穎、劉冠麟（2024）。ESG評等對財務穩定的影響：金融保險產業實證。管理資訊計算，13(1)，57-70。 林金賢、黃瓊瑤、張瑞元（2012）。環境揭露與財務績效關聯性－盈餘管理之調節效果。輔仁管理評論，19(3)，27-54。 金管會（2014）。上市公司編製與申報企業社會責任報告書作業辦法。臺北：金融監督管理委員會。 金融監督管理委員會（2022）。上市公司永續發展路徑圖。金融監督管理委員會。 柯玉珠（2023）。探討ESG對企業績效與持續發展之影響─以堃達公司ESG報告書為例（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學，臺北市。 郜凱聞（2023）。企業ESG之投入對臺灣食品與飲料產業永續發展目標之探討——資料包絡分析法之應用（未出版之碩士論文）。國立臺灣大學，臺北市。 國家發展委員會（2021）。台灣永續發展目標。行政院國家發展委員會。 陳建宏、高雩瑄（2023）。ESG成分股與非ESG成分股財務績效之研究。財金論文叢刊，38，53-73。 喬友慶、張鈺臻、周靖偉（2022）。B2B情境中，供應商企業社會責任與顧客滿意度關聯性之探討：垂直組織間承諾的調節效果與競爭者辨識的調節式中介效果。臺大管理論叢，32(3)，79-115。 游萬淵、林佩欣（2023）。國際評價準則融入ESG範疇計畫分享及展望。會計研究月刊，446，74-79。 黃正忠、林泉興、狄佳瑩（2020）。ESG報告與責任投資發展下會計師的角色。會計研究月刊，417，107-113。 環保署（2021）。110年台灣資源循環績效年報。行政院環境保護署。 環保署（2022）。111年廚餘減量及資源化推動計畫成果報告。行政院環境保護署。 白佩華（2023）。擁抱ESG兼顧EPS：企業推動永續轉型，要從風險管理的5大步驟開始。碳中和科技聯盟協會。 Kadyn。【公司治理】透明度和責任性｜建立企業聲譽與可持續發展的基石。 富達國際（2018）。聯合國盡責投資原則。 黃啟峰、潘子欽、林杏秋（2024）。食品飲料及菸草業能源大用戶能源消費特性分析。《燃燒季刊》 124期 (2024/02) Pp. 4-15。 許和鈞（2002）。我國環境績效評估指標之建立暨資料庫系統之整合（I）。行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫完整成果報告 黃正忠、劉義城、Markus Lehni。生態效益指標全球發展現況。台灣產業服務基金會。 陳昀翔（2023）。企業永續水資源績效指標與模糊評量制度研究。國立台灣大學。 張育琳、劉俊儒（2017）。低水電有助於公司績效嗎。管理學報35 卷，1 期（2018）Pp. 103-136。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/96299 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在發展可以應用於台灣上市食品企業的環境水資源永續績效評估體系，並將上市食品公司的水資源績效表現與其財務績效作關聯性探討。通過文獻回顧和專家諮詢，以水資源永續為主要議題，構建包含3個次要議題和12個指標的評估框架，採用層級分析法(AHP)，並邀請84位專家進行問卷評估，確定各指標的權重，由此評量方式計算出企業的各個水資源績效指標分數。
3個次要議題重要性相當，這顯示專家對於台灣食品企業的水資源使用量、水資源來源和廢水排放皆非常重要。在全部12個指標中，廢水排放量現況（權重 17.38%）和廢水排放量變化（權重 17.38%）為權重最高的2個指標，顯示廢水排放在台灣食品產業環境永續發展中的核心地位。 最後透過球型統計模式將各指標分數，乘上權重後得到各企業的水資源永續績效總分。研究結果顯示各企業在水資源績效的排名以及應注重改善的指標。 本研究進一步探討水資源永續績效與企業財務績效表現之間的關係，僅初步地將企業每股盈餘、資產報酬率、淨值比與用水量和用水密集度作線性迴歸分析，分析結果顯示用水密集度與財務績效略有負相關關聯，但判斷係數不高，未來建議以更多財務績效和財務計畫做系統化的分析，或許能發現更多關聯性。 本研究為台灣上市食品企業提供了一個系統性的水資源管理績效評估框架，研究結果可為企業制定水環境管理策略、政府制定相關政策，以及投資者評估企業環境風險提供重要參考。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study aims to develop a sustainability performance assessment system for environmental water resources, specifically tailored for publicly listed food companies in Taiwan. Additionally, the study explores the relationship between water resource performance and financial performance of these companies. Through a comprehensive literature review and expert consultations, the framework was constructed focusing on water resource sustainability, comprising three subtopics and twelve indicators. Utilizing the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP), 84 experts were invited to participate in a survey to determine the weight of each indicator. These weights were then used to calculate the performance scores for each water resource indicator for the companies.
The three subtopics—water usage, water resource sources, and wastewater discharge—were deemed equally important by the experts, indicating that all aspects of water resource management are crucial for Taiwanese food companies. Among the twelve indicators, the current status of wastewater discharge and the changes in wastewater discharge, each with a weight of 17.38%, were identified as the most critical indicators. This highlights the central role of wastewater management in the sustainable development of the food industry in Taiwan. The spherical statistical model was employed to calculate the total sustainability performance score for water resources by multiplying the scores of each indicator by their respective weights. The results provided a ranking of the companies based on their water resource performance and highlighted areas for improvement. The study also examined the relationship between water resource sustainability performance and financial performance, conducting a preliminary linear regression analysis of earnings per share (EPS), return on assets (ROA), and price-to-book ratio (P/B) against water usage and water usage intensity. The results indicated a slight negative correlation between water usage intensity and financial performance, though the coefficient of determination was low. Future research is recommended to include a more systematic analysis of additional financial metrics and plans to uncover more significant relationships. This research provides a systematic framework for evaluating the water resource management performance of Taiwanese publicly listed food companies. The findings offer valuable insights for companies in formulating water environment management strategies, for the government in policy making, and for investors in assessing environmental risks associated with these companies. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-12-24T16:14:05Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-12-24T16:14:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
口試委員審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii ABSTRACT iv 目次 vi 圖次 vii 表次 viii 第1章 前言 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目標與項目 3 第2章 文獻回顧 5 2.1 ESG和企業永續發展 5 2.2 食品產業對環境的影響 12 2.3 環境績效評估方法 14 第3章 研究方法 20 3.1 研究架構 20 3.2 研究產業標的 20 3.3 研究工具 21 3.4 專家問卷 30 3.5研究限制 31 第4章 結果與討論 34 4.1研究產業標的 34 4.2水資源指標 34 4.3 球型統計模型評分 44 4.4 指標權重 56 4.5 水資源績效總評量 60 4.6 財務績效 61 第5章 結論與建議 68 5.1 結論 68 5.2 建議 69 參考文獻 70 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 台灣上市食品公司水資源永續績效評量方法之研究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Evaluation on Water Resource Sustainability Performance of Listed Food Companies in Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 113-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 吳忠信;吳萬益;郭孟芸 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chung-Hsin Wu;Wan-Ii Wu ;Meng-Yun Kuo | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 上市食品企業,層級分析法,環境績效評估,水資源永續績效,財務績效, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG),Publicly Listed Food Companies,Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP),environmental performance assessment,water resource management, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 79 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202404685 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-12-10 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 環境工程學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-113-1.pdf | 2.31 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。