Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 文學院
  3. 語言學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94968
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor李佳霖zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorChia-Lin Leeen
dc.contributor.author陳柏亨zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorPo-Heng Chenen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-22T16:09:47Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-23-
dc.date.copyright2024-08-22-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-08-13-
dc.identifier.citationAboitiz, F., & Montiel, J. (2003). One hundred million years of interhemispheric communication: the history of the corpus callosum. Brazilian journal of medical and biological research, 36(4), 409-420. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0100-879x2003000400002
Antonenko, D., Brauer, J., Meinzer, M., Fengler, A., Kerti, L., Friederici, A. D., & Flöel, A. (2013). Functional and structural syntax networks in aging. Neuroimage, 83, 513-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.018
Antonenko, D., Meinzer, M., Lindenberg, R., Witte, A. V., & Flöel, A. (2012). Grammar learning in older adults is linked to white matter microstructure and functional connectivity. Neuroimage, 62(3), 1667-1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.05.074
Anwyl-Irvine, A. L., Massonnié, J., Flitton, A., Kirkham, N., & Evershed, J. K. (2020). Gorilla in our midst: An online behavioral experiment builder. Behavior Research Methods, 52(1), 388-407. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01237-x
Ashburner, J. (2007). A fast diffeomorphic image registration algorithm. Neuroimage, 38(1), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.007
Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008, 11//). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390-412. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
Baddeley, A., Emslie, H., & Smith, I. N. (1992). The Speed and Capacity of Language Processing test. Thames Valley Test Company.
Badre, D., Poldrack, R. A., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Insler, R. Z., & Wagner, A. D. (2005, 2005/09/15/). Dissociable Controlled Retrieval and Generalized Selection Mechanisms in Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex. Neuron, 47(6), 907-918. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2005.07.023
Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2007, 2007/01/01/). Left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and the cognitive control of memory. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 2883-2901. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.06.015
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255-278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
Bartzokis, G., Sultzer, D., Lu, P. H., Nuechterlein, K. H., Mintz, J., & Cummings, J. L. (2004). Heterogeneous age-related breakdown of white matter structural integrity: implications for cortical “disconnection” in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiology of aging, 25(7), 843-851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2003.09.005
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1 - 48. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
Bekinschtein, T. A., Davis, M. H., Rodd, J. M., & Owen, A. M. (2011). Why Clowns Taste Funny: The Relationship between Humor and Semantic Ambiguity. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31(26), 9665. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5058-10.2011
Blaauw, J., & Meiners, L. C. (2020). The splenium of the corpus callosum: embryology, anatomy, function and imaging with pathophysiological hypothesis. Neuroradiology, 62(5), 563-585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-019-02357-z
Bourne, V. J. (2006). The divided visual field paradigm: Methodological considerations. Laterality, 11(4), 373-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500600633982
Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2017, 2017/04/01/). Goals and strategies influence lexical prediction during sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 203-216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.002
Brothers, T., Wlotko, E. W., Warnke, L., & Kuperberg, G. R. (2020). Going the Extra Mile: Effects of Discourse Context on Two Late Positivities During Language Comprehension. Neurobiology of Language, 1(1), 135-160. https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00006
Brouwer, H., Crocker, M. W., Venhuizen, N. J., & Hoeks, J. C. J. (2017). A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing. Cognitive Science, 41(S6), 1318-1352. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12461
Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of cognition, 1(1), 1-20.
Brysbaert, M., Stevens, M., Mandera, P., & Keuleers, E. (2016, 2016-July-29). How Many Words Do We Know? Practical Estimates of Vocabulary Size Dependent on Word Definition, the Degree of Language Input and the Participant’s Age [Original Research]. Frontiers in Psychology, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01116
Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychology and Aging, 17(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.17.1.85
Chang, C.-T., Lee, C.-Y., Lee, C.-L., Tsai, J.-L., & Chou, C.-J. (2013, April). The role of syntactic category in lexical access: An ERP Study of Chinese homograph. Poster session presented at the Twentieth Annual Cognitive Neuroscience Society Meeting, San Francisco, USA
Chen, K.-j., Huang, C.-R., Chang, L.-p., & Hsu, H.-L. (1996). Sinica Corpus: Design Methodology for Balanced Corpora. In B.-S. Park & J. B. Kim (Eds.), Proceeding of the 11 th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation (pp. 167-176). https://aclanthology.org/Y96-1018
Chen, P.-H., & Tsai, J.-L. (2015). The Influence of Syntactic Category and Semantic Constraints on Lexical Ambiguity Resolution: An Eye Movement Study of Processing Chinese Homographs. Language and Linguistics, 16(4), 555-586. https://doi.org/10.1177/1606822x15583239
Chen, P.-H., Yeh, C., Lu, C., Hsieh, S.-K., Chou, T.-L., Su, L. I.-W., & Lee, C.-L. (2018). Multiple scaffolding mechanisms for L2 syntactic processing: An Event-Related Potential study. Journal of Chinese Language Teaching, 15(2), 63-93. http://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?DocID=18118429-201806-201807040021-201807040021-63-93
Chen, Y.-J., Lo, Y.-C., Hsu, Y.-C., Fan, C.-C., Hwang, T.-J., Liu, C.-M., Chien, Y.-L., Hsieh, M. H., Liu, C.-C., Hwu, H.-G., & Tseng, W.-Y. I. (2015). Automatic whole brain tract-based analysis using predefined tracts in a diffusion spectrum imaging template and an accurate registration strategy. Human brain mapping, 36(9), 3441-3458. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22854
Cox, S. R., Bastin, M. E., Ferguson, K. J., Allerhand, M., Royle, N. A., Maniega, S. M., Starr, J. M., MacLullich, A. M. J., Wardlaw, J. M., Deary, I. J., & MacPherson, S. E. (2015). Compensation or inhibitory failure? Testing hypotheses of age-related right frontal lobe involvement in verbal memory ability using structural and diffusion MRI. Cortex, 63, 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.08.001
Craik, F. I. M., & Bialystok, E. (2006). Cognition through the lifespan: mechanisms of change. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(3), 131-138. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.01.007
Craik, F. I. M., & Bosman, E. A. (1992). Age-related changes in memory and learning. In H. Bouma & J. Graafmans (Eds.), Gerontechnology: Proceedings of the First International Conference on Technology and Aging (pp. 79-92). IOS Press.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
Davis, M. H., Coleman, M. R., Absalom, A. R., Rodd, J. M., Johnsrude, I. S., Matta, B. F., Owen, A. M., & Menon, D. K. (2007). Dissociating speech perception and comprehension at reduced levels of awareness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(41), 16032-16037. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.0701309104
Davis, S. W., Dennis, N. A., Buchler, N. G., White, L. E., Madden, D. J., & Cabeza, R. (2009). Assessing the effects of age on long white matter tracts using diffusion tensor tractography. Neuroimage, 46(2), 530-541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.068
Davis, S. W., Kragel, J. E., Madden, D. J., & Cabeza, R. (2012). The Architecture of Cross-Hemispheric Communication in the Aging Brain: Linking Behavior to Functional and Structural Connectivity. Cerebral Cortex, 22(1), 232-242. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr123
Davis, S. W., Zhuang, J., Wright, P., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Age-related sensitivity to task-related modulation of language-processing networks. Neuropsychologia, 63, 107-115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.08.017
DeLong, K. A., Quante, L., & Kutas, M. (2014, 2014/08/01/). Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 61, 150-162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016
Dubossarsky, H., De Deyne, S., & Hills, T. T. (2017). Quantifying the structure of free association networks across the life span. Developmental psychology, 53(8), 1560.
Duffy, S. A., Kambe, G., & Rayner, K. (2001). The effect of prior disambiguating context on the comprehension of ambiguous words: Evidence from eye movements. In D. S. Gorfein (Ed.), On the consequences of meaning selection: Perspectives on resolving lexical ambiguity (pp. 27-43). American Psychological Association.
Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988, Aug). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 429-446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596x(88)90066-6
Federmeier, K. D. (2022). Connecting and considering: Electrophysiology provides insights into comprehension. Psychophysiology, 59(1), e13940. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13940
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2002). Picture the difference: electrophysiological investigations of picture processing in the two cerebral hemispheres. Neuropsychologia, 40(7), 730-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00193-2
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2005). Aging in context: Age-related changes in context use during language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 42(2), 133-141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00274.x
Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2019). What's “left”? Hemispheric sensitivity to predictability and congruity during sentence reading by older adults. Neuropsychologia, 133, 107173.
Federmeier, K. D., Mai, H., & Kutas, M. (2005). Both sides get the point: Hemispheric sensitivities to sentential constraint. Memory & Cognition, 33(5), 871-886. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193082
Federmeier, K. D., Van Petten, C., Schwartz, T. J., & Kutas, M. (2003). Sounds, Words, Sentences: Age-Related Changes Across Levels of Language Processing. Psychology and Aging, 18, 858-872. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.4.858
Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007, 2007/05/18/). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
Fedorenko, E., Nieto-Castañon, A., & Kanwisher, N. (2012). Lexical and syntactic representations in the brain: An fMRI investigation with multi-voxel pattern analyses. Neuropsychologia, 50(4), 499-513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.014
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of psychiatric research, 12(3), 189-198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
Friedrich, P., Ocklenburg, S., Heins, N., Schlüter, C., Fraenz, C., Beste, C., Güntürkün, O., & Genç, E. (2017). Callosal microstructure affects the timing of electrophysiological left-right differences. Neuroimage, 163, 310-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.048
Goh, J. O. S. (2011). Functional Dedifferentiation and Altered Connectivity in Older Adults: Neural Accounts of Cognitive Aging. Aging and disease, 2(1), 30-48. http://www.aginganddisease.org/CN/abstract/article_147266.shtml
Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure. Psychological Science, 13(5), 431-436. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00476
Gootjes, L., Bouma, A., Van Strien, J., Van Schijndel, R., Barkhof, F., & Scheltens, P. (2006). Corpus callosum size correlates with asymmetric performance on a dichotic listening task in healthy aging but not in Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.002
Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: an R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493-498. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
Griffiths, J. D., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2012). Functional Organization of the Neural Language System: Dorsal and Ventral Pathways Are Critical for Syntax. Cerebral Cortex, 23(1), 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr386
Guo, N. W., Liu, H. C., Wong, P. F., Liao, K. K., Yan, S. H., Lin, K. P., Chang, C. Y., & Hsu, T. C. (1988). Chinese Version and Norms of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Journal Chinese Rehabilitative Medicine(16), 52-59. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Publication/alDetailedMesh?docid=10253009-198812-x-16-52-59-a#Altmetrics
Hagoort, P. (2005, 2005/09/01/). On Broca, brain, and binding: a new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 416-423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004
Hagoort, P. (2013, 2013-July-12). MUC (Memory, Unification, Control) and beyond [Hypothesis and Theory]. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00416
Hakun, J. G., Zhu, Z., Brown, C. A., Johnson, N. F., & Gold, B. T. (2015). Longitudinal alterations to brain function, structure, and cognitive performance in healthy older adults: A fMRI-DTI study. Neuropsychologia, 71, 225-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.008
Heilbron, M., Armeni, K., Schoffelen, J. M., Hagoort, P., & De Lange, F. P. (2022). A hierarchy of linguistic predictions during natural language comprehension. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(32), e2201968119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2201968119
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004, 2004/05/01/). Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92(1), 67-99. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011
Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007, 2007/05/01). The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393-402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113
Hines, M., Chiu, L., McAdams, L. A., Bentler, P. M., & Lipcamon, J. (1992). Cognition and the corpus callosum: verbal fluency, visuospatial ability, and language lateralization related to midsagittal surface areas of callosal subregions. Behavioral neuroscience, 106(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1037//0735-7044.106.1.3
Hoffman, P. (2018). An individual differences approach to semantic cognition: Divergent effects of age on representation, retrieval and selection. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 8145. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-26569-0
Hsu, Y. C., Lo, Y. C., Chen, Y. J., Wedeen, V. J., & Tseng, W.-Y. I. (2015). NTU‐DSI‐122: A diffusion spectrum imaging template with high anatomical matching to the ICBM‐152 space. Human brain mapping, 36(9), 3528-3541. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22860
Hubbard, R. J., & Federmeier, K. D. (2021, 2021/08/01/). Dividing attention influences contextual facilitation and revision during language comprehension. Brain Research, 1764, 147466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147466
Hulme, R. C., & Rodd, J. M. (2021, 2021/08/10). Learning new word meanings from story reading: the benefit of immediate testing. PeerJ, 9, e11693. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.11693
Hynd, G. W., Hall, J., Novey, E. S., Eliopulos, D., Black, K., Gonzalez, J. J., Edmonds, J. E., Riccio, C., & Cohen, M. (1995). Dyslexia and Corpus Callosum Morphology. Archives of Neurology, 52(1), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1995.00540250036010
Josse, G., Seghier, M. L., Kherif, F., & Price, C. J. (2008). Explaining Function with Anatomy: Language Lateralization and Corpus Callosum Size. The Journal of Neuroscience, 28(52), 14132. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4383-08.2008
Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Thirty Years and Counting: Finding Meaning in the N400 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential (ERP). Annual review of psychology, 62(1), 621-647. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123
Leckey, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Age-related shifts in hemispheric dominance for syntactic processing. Psychophysiology, 54(12), 1929-1939. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12970
Leckey, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2020). The P3b and P600(s): Positive contributions to language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 57(7), e13351. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13351
Lee, C. L. (2018). Familial Sinistrality and Language Processing. In K. D. Federmeier & D. G. Watson (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 68, pp. 143-177). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2018.08.005
Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009, Nov). Wave-ering: An ERP study of syntactic and semantic context effects on ambiguity resolution for noun/verb homographs. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(4), 538-555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.08.003
Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2011). Differential age effects on lexical ambiguity resolution mechanisms. Psychophysiology, 48(7), 960-972. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01158.x
Lee, C. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2015). It’s All in the Family: Brain Asymmetry and Syntactic Processing of Word Class. Psychological Science, 26(7), 997-1005. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615575743
Lee, C. L., Huang, H.-W., Federmeier, K. D., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2018). Sensory and semantic activations evoked by action attributes of manipulable objects: Evidence from ERPs. Neuroimage, 167, 331-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.045
Li, P., Bates, E., & Macwhinney, B. (1993). Processing A Language without Inflections: A Reaction Time Study of Sentence Interpretation in Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(2), 169-192. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1010
Long, L. L., & Shaw, R. J. (2000, 2000/10/01). Adult age differences in vocabulary acquisition. Educational Gerontology, 26(7), 651-664. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270050200644
Luck, S. J. (2014). An introduction to the event-related potential technique. MIT press.
MacGregor, L. J., Rodd, J. M., Gilbert, R. A., Hauk, O., Sohoglu, E., & Davis, M. H. (2020). The Neural Time Course of Semantic Ambiguity Resolution in Speech Comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(3), 403-425. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01493
Maciejewski, G., Rodd, J. M., Mon-Williams, M., & Klepousniotou, E. (2019). The cost of learning new meanings for familiar words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(2), 188-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1642500
Mason, R. A., & Just, M. A. (2007, 2007/05/18/). Lexical ambiguity in sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1146, 115-127. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.076
Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305-315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
Meyer, A. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007, 2007/12/05/). The effects of context, meaning frequency, and associative strength on semantic selection: Distinct contributions from each cerebral hemisphere. Brain Research, 1183, 91-108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.09.007
Meyer, A. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Event-related potentials reveal the effects of aging on meaning selection and revision. Psychophysiology, 47(4), 673-686. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.00983.x
Miller, L. J., Myers, A., Prinzi, L., & Mittenberg, W. (2009). Changes in Intellectual Functioning Associated with Normal Aging. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 24(7), 681-688. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp072
Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13. http://www.jalt-publications.org/archive/tlt/2007/07_2007TLT.pdf
Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2000). Adult age differences in memory performance: Tests of an associative deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(5), 1170-1187. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1170
Naveh-Benjamin, M., Hussain, Z., Guez, J., & Bar-On, M. (2003). Adult age differences in episodic memory: further support for an associative-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(5), 826-837.
Neville, H. J., Kutas, M., & Schmidt, A. (1982). Event-related potential studies of cerebral specialization during reading: I. Studies of normal adults. Brain and language, 16(2), 300-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(82)90088-8
Novick, J. M., Kan, I. P., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009, 2009/09/01). A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments following damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26(6), 527-567. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290903519367
Novick, J. M., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2005, 2005/09/01). Cognitive control and parsing: Reexamining the role of Broca’s area in sentence comprehension. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(3), 263-281. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.5.3.263
Ocklenburg, S., Friedrich, P., Güntürkün, O., & Genç, E. (2016). Intrahemispheric white matter asymmetries: the missing link between brain structure and functional lateralization? Reviews in the Neurosciences, 27(5), 465-480. https://doi.org/10.1515/revneuro-2015-0052
Old, S. R., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2008). Differential effects of age on item and associative measures of memory: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 23(1), 104-118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.23.1.104
Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
Pacht, J. M., & Rayner, K. (1993, Mar). The processing of homophonic homographs during reading: Evidence from eye-movement studies. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 22(2), 251-271. <Go to ISI>://WOS:A1993LL39900009
Park, D., Lautenschlarger, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N., Smith, A., & Smith, P. (2003). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the lifespan. Psychology and Aging.
Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., & Smith, A. D. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 299-320.
Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17(2), 299-320. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299
Park, S., Ryu, S.-H., Yoo, Y., Yang, J.-J., Kwon, H., Youn, J.-H., Lee, J.-M., Cho, S.-J., & Lee, J.-Y. (2018). Neural predictors of cognitive improvement by multi-strategic memory training based on metamemory in older adults with subjective memory complaints. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 1095. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19390-2
Parks, R., Ray, J., & Bland, S. (1998). Wordsmyth English Dictionary-Thesaurus [Electronic version] www.wordsmyth.net
Penke, L., Maniega, S. M., Houlihan, L. M., Murray, C., Gow, A. J., Clayden, J. D., Bastin, M. E., Wardlaw, J. M., & Deary, I. J. (2010). White matter integrity in the splenium of the corpus callosum is related to successful cognitive aging and partly mediates the protective effect of an ancestral polymorphism in ADRB2. Behavior genetics, 40(2), 146-156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10519-009-9318-4
Qi, Z., & Legault, J. (2020). Neural hemispheric organization in successful adult language learning: Is left always right? In K. D. Federmeier & H.-W. Huang (Eds.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 72, pp. 119-163). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.plm.2020.02.004
R. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/.
Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaoul, C., Milin, P., & Baayen, H. (2014). The myth of cognitive decline: Non‐linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in cognitive science, 6(1), 5-42.
Raven, J. C., Raven, J. E., & Court, J. H. (1989). Mill Hill vocabulary scale. Psychological Corporation.
Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986, May). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word-frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14(3), 191-201. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03197692
Rayner, K., & Frazier, L. (1989, Sep). Selection mechanisms in reading lexically ambiguous words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 779-790. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.5.779
Rayner, K., Pacht, J. M., & Duffy, S. A. (1994, Aug). Effects of prior encounter and global discourse bias on the processing of lexically ambiguous words: Evidence from eye fixations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(4), 527-544. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1025
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., & Park, D. C. (2014). How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition. Neuropsychology review, 24(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9
Rodd, J. M. (2018). Lexical ambiguity. In Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 120-144).
Rodd, J. M., Berriman, R., Landau, M., Lee, T., Ho, C., Gaskell, M. G., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Learning new meanings for old words: effects of semantic relatedness. Memory & Cognition, 40(7), 1095-1108. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-012-0209-1
Rodd, J. M., Cai, Z. G., Betts, H. N., Hanby, B., Hutchinson, C., & Adler, A. (2016). The impact of recent and long-term experience on access to word meanings: Evidence from large-scale internet-based experiments. Journal of Memory and Language, 87, 16-37. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.006
Rodd, J. M., Davis, M. H., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2005). The Neural Mechanisms of Speech Comprehension: fMRI studies of Semantic Ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, 15(8), 1261-1269. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhi009
Rodd, J. M., Johnsrude, I. S., & Davis, M. H. (2011). Dissociating Frontotemporal Contributions to Semantic Ambiguity Resolution in Spoken Sentences. Cerebral Cortex, 22(8), 1761-1773. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr252
Rodd, J. M., Longe, O. A., Randall, B., & Tyler, L. K. (2010). The functional organisation of the fronto-temporal language system: evidence from syntactic and semantic ambiguity. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1324-1335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.12.035
Rodd, J. M., Vitello, S., Woollams, A. M., & Adank, P. (2015, 2015/02/01/). Localising semantic and syntactic processing in spoken and written language comprehension: An Activation Likelihood Estimation meta-analysis. Brain and Language, 141, 89-102. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.11.012
Rommers, J., Dickson, D. S., Norton, J. J. S., Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Alpha and theta band dynamics related to sentential constraint and word expectancy. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 576-589. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1183799
Salat, D., Tuch, D., Greve, D., Van Der Kouwe, A., Hevelone, N., Zaleta, A., Rosen, B., Fischl, B., Corkin, S., & Rosas, H. D. (2005). Age-related alterations in white matter microstructure measured by diffusion tensor imaging. Neurobiology of aging, 26(8), 1215-1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2004.09.017
Sammler, D., Kotz, S. A., Eckstein, K., Ott, D. V., & Friederici, A. D. (2010). Prosody meets syntax: the role of the corpus callosum. Brain, 133(9), 2643-2655. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq231
Service, E., & Craik, F. I. M. (1993, 1993/10/01/). Differences Between Young and Older Adults in Learning A Foreign Vocabulary. Journal of Memory and Language, 32(5), 608-623. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1993.1031
Shafto, M. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2014). Language in the aging brain: the network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346(6209), 583-587. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1254404
Simpson, G. B. (1981). Meaning dominance and semantic context in the processing of lexical ambiguity [Article]. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20(1), 120-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(81)90356-x
Smyth, A. C., & Naveh-Benjamin, M. (2018, 2018/01/01). Existing knowledge of linguistic structure mitigates associative memory deficits in older adults. Experimental Aging Research, 44(1), 35-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2017.1398517
Snijders, T. M., Vosse, T., Kempen, G., Van Berkum, J. J. A., Petersson, K. M., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Retrieval and Unification of Syntactic Structure in Sentence Comprehension: an fMRI Study Using Word-Category Ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex, 19(7), 1493-1503. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn187
Steinhauer, K., Alter, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2(2), 191-196. https://doi.org/10.1038/5757
Stites, M. C., Federmeier, K. D., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2013, Nov). Cross-Age Comparisons Reveal Multiple Strategies for Lexical Ambiguity Resolution During Natural Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39(6), 1823-1841. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032860
Swinney, D. A. (1979). Lexical access during sentence comprehension: (Re)consideration of context effects. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(6), 645-659. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5371(79)90355-4
Tahmasebi, A. M., Davis, M. H., Wild, C. J., Rodd, J. M., Hakyemez, H., Abolmaesumi, P., & Johnsrude, I. S. (2011). Is the Link between Anatomical Structure and Function Equally Strong at All Cognitive Levels of Processing? Cerebral Cortex, 22(7), 1593-1603. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr205
Tanner, D., & Van Hell, J. G. (2014). ERPs reveal individual differences in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia, 56, 289-301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.02.002
Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(26), 14792-14797. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792
Tsao, C.-H. (2019). Effects of Meaning Dominance on Lexical Ambiguity Resolution in Syntactic Context—An ERP Study of Homograph Processing in Chinese. Taipei: National Taiwan University MA thesis. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/11296/28n96g
Tseng, W.-Y. I., Hsu, Y.-C., Chen, C.-L., Kang, Y.-J., Kao, T.-W., Chen, P.-Y., & Waiter, G. D. (2021). Microstructural differences in white matter tracts across middle to late adulthood: a diffusion MRI study on 7167 UK Biobank participants. Neurobiology of aging, 98, 160-172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2020.10.006
Tyler, L. K., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Randall, B., Wright, P., Devereux, B. J., Zhuang, J., Papoutsi, M., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2011). Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage. Brain, 134(2), 415-431. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq369
Tyler, L. K., Shafto, M. A., Randall, B., Wright, P., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2010). Preserving syntactic processing across the adult life span: the modulation of the frontotemporal language system in the context of age-related atrophy. Cerebral Cortex, 20(2), 352-364. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp105
Tyler, L. K., Wright, P., Randall, B., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2010). Reorganization of syntactic processing following left-hemisphere brain damage: does right-hemisphere activity preserve function? Brain, 133(11), 3396-3408. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awq262
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176-1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
Verhaeghen, P. (2003a). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18(2), 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.332
Verhaeghen, P. (2003b). Aging and vocabulary score: A meta-analysis. Psychology and Aging, 18, 332-339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.332
Vermeiren, H., Vandendaele, A., & Brysbaert, M. (2022, 2022/05/16). Validated tests for language research with university students whose native language is English: Tests of vocabulary, general knowledge, author recognition, and reading comprehension. Behavior Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-01856-x
Vitello, S., & Rodd, J. M. (2015). Resolving Semantic Ambiguities in Sentences: Cognitive Processes and Brain Mechanisms. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(10), 391-405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12160
Vitello, S., Warren, J. E., Devlin, J. T., & Rodd, J. M. (2014, 2014-July-29). Roles of frontal and temporal regions in reinterpreting semantically ambiguous sentences [Original Research]. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00530
Weissman, D. H., & Banich, M. T. (2000). The cerebral hemispheres cooperate to perform complex but not simple tasks. Neuropsychology, 14(1), 41-59. https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.14.1.41
Weng, Y. L., & Lee, C. L. (2020). Reduced right-hemisphere ERP P600 grammaticality effect is associated with greater right-hemisphere inhibition: Evidence from right-handers with familial sinistrality. Brain Research, 1738, Article 146815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146815
Westerhausen, R., Kreuder, F., Woerner, W., Huster, R. J., Smit, C. M., Schweiger, E., & Wittling, W. (2006). Interhemispheric transfer time and structural properties of the corpus callosum. Neuroscience Letters, 409(2), 140-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.028
Whiting, E., Chenery, H. J., & Copland, D. A. (2011, 2011/09/01). Effect of aging on learning new names and descriptions for objects. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 18(5), 594-619. https://doi.org/10.1080/13825585.2011.598912
Wingfield, A., & Grossman, M. (2006). Language and the Aging Brain: Patterns of Neural Compensation Revealed by Functional Brain Imaging. Journal of Neurophysiology, 96(6), 2830-2839. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00628.2006
Wlotko, E. W., Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (2012). To predict or not to predict: Age-related differences in the use of sentential context. Psychology and Aging, 27, 975-988. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029206
Wlotko, E. W., Lee, C.-L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2010). Language of the Aging Brain: Event-Related Potential Studies of Comprehension in Older Adults. Language and Linguistics Compass, 4(8), 623-638. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2010.00224.x
Wright, P., Stamatakis, E. A., & Tyler, L. K. (2012). Differentiating Hemispheric Contributions to Syntax and Semantics in Patients with Left-Hemisphere Lesions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 32(24), 8149. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0485-12.2012
Yeatman, J. D., Tang, K. A., Donnelly, P. M., Yablonski, M., Ramamurthy, M., Karipidis, I. I., Caffarra, S., Takada, M. E., Kanopka, K., Ben-Shachar, M., & Domingue, B. W. (2021). Rapid online assessment of reading ability. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 6396. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85907-x
Yeh, C., Chen, M.-H., Chen, P.-H., & Lee, C.-L. (2020). Lateralization as a Symphony: Joint Influence of Interhemispheric Inhibition and Transmission Delay on Brain Asymmetry and Syntactic Processing. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/n6q2e
Zaccarella, E., & Friederici, A. D. (2017). The neurobiological nature of syntactic hierarchies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 81, 205-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.07.038
Zempleni, M.-Z., Renken, R., Hoeks, J. C. J., Hoogduin, J. M., & Stowe, L. A. (2007, 2007/02/01/). Semantic ambiguity processing in sentence context: Evidence from event-related fMRI. NeuroImage, 34(3), 1270-1279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.048
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94968-
dc.description.abstract人類的語言富有創造力,在各種語言層面(例如語意、句法等)皆涵蓋了許多預期之外的用法。人類處理這些預期之外的用法的能力可能會受到健康老化的影響,這對於成年人的語言理解和有效溝通至關重要。本論文主要使用非侵入性且具時間敏感性的腦電圖(EEG),在三項不同的研究中,探討健康老化如何影響個體處理違反預期的語意和句法訊息的能力。
在研究一中,我們著重在違反預期的語意訊息處理,旨在檢驗兩項研究問題:(一)過去常誘發於違反強烈語境預期的頭殼前區正向波(the anterior positivity,AP)是否一定得仰賴語境中強烈的語意約束?(二)該頭殼前區正向波是否反映了重新排序弱勢語意的過程。我們記錄了 32 位年輕的台灣華語母語者在閱讀單義詞或名動歧義詞(如英文中的watch)時的腦電反應,並刻意讓出現在這些詞前面的單詞語境不具語意預測力,僅提供語法上的限制。結果顯示,相較於單義詞和歧義詞的主要語義,當單詞語境在語法上偏向歧義詞的次要語義時,受試者誘發了較大的 AP 反應。這表明 AP 的誘發並不一定得仰賴語句/篇章語境中強烈的語意約束,而是反映了重新排序弱勢語意的過程。
在研究二中,我們使用與研究一相同的材料和實驗典範,招募了 40 位年長的台灣華語母語者,進一步探討健康老化是否會阻礙重新排序弱勢語意的能力。結果顯示,年長受試者與年輕受試者一樣,相較於單義詞和歧義詞的主要語義,歧義詞的次要語義也誘發了較大的 AP 反應。這表明重新排序弱勢語意的過程並沒有受到健康老化的影響。
在研究三中,我們轉而著重在違反預期的語法訊息處理,旨在探討健康老化過程中右腦半球(RH)在語法處理時額外增強的反應如何受到胼胝體結構完整性的調節。我們在70位台灣華語母語者的左視野或右視野呈現了違反語法規則的短語,同時測量其事件相關電位(ERPs)。此外,我們也加入擴散張量影像技術(DTI)量測其中44位志願受試者的胼胝體結構完整性。腦電圖結果顯示,年輕和年長受試者的左腦半球(LH)對違反語法規則的短語都誘發了 P600 反應,但只有年長受試者額外引發了右腦半球的 P600 反應。擴散張量影像結果顯示,年長受試者的右腦半球 P600 反應與胼胝體壓部(splenium)結構的擴散不等向性(FA)值呈現正相關,但在胼胝體膝部(genu)結構並未觀察到類似的關聯性。這些結果突顯出除了英語之外,以台灣華語為母語的老年人其右腦半球也能誘發本質上類似左腦半球的語法反應(P600)。更重要的是,我們發現胼胝體壓部結構的完整性可以調節老年人在處理語法訊息時兩腦半球之間的協調。
總結來說,本論文透過整合具時間敏感性的腦電圖和擴散張量影像等神經影像技術,提供了新的證據,顯示某些認知功能在健康年長者中仍然得到良好的保存。此外,年長者的大腦結構完整性也會調節其運用額外的神經認知資源之能力。這些發現有助於理解健康老化如何影響我們處理違反預期的語言訊息之認知和神經機制。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractHuman languages are inherently creative and feature a wide range of unexpected usages across different linguistic aspects, such as semantics and syntax. Our ability to handle these unexpected usages can be influenced by healthy aging, which is crucial for successful language comprehension and effective communication across the adulthood. This dissertation aims to investigate how healthy aging affects individuals’ capacity to process semantic and syntactic unexpectedness using non-invasive, time-sensitive Electroencephalography (EEG) through three distinct studies.
In Study 1, we focused on semantic unexpectedness and examined (1) whether an elicitation of anterior positivity (AP), an event-related potential (ERP) component often observed for disconfirmed semantic predictions, hinges on a strong semantic contextual constraint, and (2) whether the AP reflects a process of weaker meaning reprioritization. Thirty-two younger Taiwan Mandarin native speakers’ EEG responses were recorded as they read unambiguous words or biased noun-verb homographs (e.g., watch) following one-word contexts that were semantically non-predictive but syntactically well-defined. Our results showed that the participants elicited larger AP responses when the one-word contexts syntactically favored the less frequent (subordinate) meanings of the homographs as opposed to the more frequent (dominant) meanings of the homographs and the unambiguous words, which suggests that the AP reflects a process of weaker meaning reprioritization that is not limited to sentence/discourse predictive processing.
In Study 2, 40 older Taiwan Mandarin native speakers were recruited to further investigate whether healthy aging hampers the process of weaker meaning reprioritization. With the same stimuli and experimental paradigm of Study 1, the older participants also elicited larger AP responses to the subordinate meanings of the homographs relative to the dominant meanings of the homographs and the unambiguous words, which suggests that the process of weaker meaning reprioritization is preserved in healthy aging.
In Study 3, we focused on syntactic unexpectedness and investigated how increased right-hemisphere (RH) responses in healthy older adults during syntactic processing, a highly left-lateralized function in younger adults, are modulated by callosal integrity. Syntactic phrase violations in Taiwan Mandarin were presented to either the left or right visual field with 70 (35 younger and 35 older) native speakers’ ERPs measured. A subset of 44 (24 younger and 20 older) participants’ microstructural tissue integrity of the corpus callosum was measured with diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). Younger and older adults elicited left-hemisphere (LH) P600 responses to grammatical violations, but only older adults additionally elicited a RH P600 grammaticality effect. Larger RH P600 effects in older adults were associated with larger fractional anisotropy (FA) values of the splenium. This association was not observed for the genu, which evinced significantly lower FA in older relative to younger adults. These results add to English literature highlighting that LH-similar syntactic responses are recruited in older adult RH for Taiwan Mandarin. Critically, splenium integrity modulates how older individuals engage inter-hemispheric coordination for syntactic information processing.
In sum, by integrating time-sensitive EEG with neuroimaging techniques such as DTI, this dissertation provides novel evidence that certain cognitive functions remain well-preserved in healthy older adults. Additionally, older adults’ ability to utilize extra neural-cognitive resources is influenced by the integrity of their brain’s microstructure. These findings advance our theoretical understanding of how healthy aging affects the cognitive and neural mechanisms involved in processing unexpectedness during language comprehension.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-22T16:09:47Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-08-22T16:09:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝辭 i
摘要 iii
Abstract v
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 General Background 1
1.2 Research Questions 7
1.3 Organization of the Dissertation 8
Chapter 2 Reprioritization of Unexpected Meanings in Young Adults 9
2.1 Introduction 9
2.2 Methods 13
2.2.1 Participants 13
2.2.2 Materials 14
2.2.2.1 Ratings 16
2.2.2.1.1 Rating 1: Meaning frequency 17
2.2.2.1.2 Rating 2: Meaning distance 19
2.2.2.1.3 Rating 3: Familiarity 19
2.2.2.1.4 Rating 4: Concreteness 20
2.2.2.1.5 Rating 5: Grammatical acceptability 20
2.2.2.1.6 Rating 6: Cloze probability 21
2.2.2.1.7 Rating 7: Semantic constraint 21
2.2.3 Procedure 22
2.2.4 EEG recording, data analysis, and component measurement 23
2.3 Results 24
2.3.1 Behavioral results 24
2.3.2 ERP results 24
2.3.2.1 N400 effects (300-500 ms) 24
2.3.2.2 Anterior positivity effects (650-850 ms) 25
2.4 Discussion 26
Chapter 3 Reprioritization of Unexpected Meanings in Older Adults 33
3.1 Introduction 33
3.2 Methods 35
3.2.1 Participants 35
3.2.2 Materials 35
3.2.3 Procedure and Data Analysis 36
3.3 Results 36
3.3.1 Behavioral results 36
3.3.2 ERP results 37
3.3.2.1 N400 effects (300-500 ms) 37
3.3.2.2 Anterior positivity effects (650-850 ms) 37
3.4 Discussion 39
Chapter 4 The Role of Callosal Integrity in Increased Right-Hemisphere Syntactic Violation Processing in Healthy Aging 41
4.1 Introduction 41
4.2 Methods 43
4.2.1 Participants 43
4.2.2 Materials 44
4.2.2.1 Ratings 46
4.2.2.1.1 Rating 1: Familiarity 46
4.2.2.1.2 Rating 2: Concreteness 47
4.2.2.1.3 Rating 3: Grammatical acceptability 47
4.2.3 ERP experimental procedure 47
4.2.4 EEG recording, data analysis, and component measurement 48
4.2.5 MRI Scanning Parameters 50
4.2.6 DTI analysis 50
4.3 Results 51
4.3.1 ERP grammaticality judgment experiment 51
4.3.1.1 Behavioral results 51
4.3.1.2 ERP results 52
4.3.1.2.1 Validation of VF paradigm 52
4.3.1.2.2 ERP grammaticality effects as a function of VF presentation 54
4.3.1.2.2.1 N400 effect 56
4.3.1.2.2.2 P600 effect 57
4.3.2 Age differences in CC integrity in DTI data 57
4.4 Discussion 63
4.5 Conclusion 68
Chapter 5 Conclusion 70
References 73
Appendix A. Study 1 & 2: Instructions and sample items for Rating 1 – Meaning frequency 86
Appendix B. Study 1 & 2: Instructions and sample items for Rating 2 – Meaning distance 87
Appendix C. Study 1 & 2: Instructions and sample items for Rating 3 – Familiarity 88
Appendix D. Study 1 & 2: Instructions and sample items for Rating 4 – Concreteness 89
Appendix E. Study 1 & 2: Instructions and sample items for Rating 5 – Grammatical acceptability 90
Appendix F. Study 3: Instructions and sample items for Rating 1 – Familiarity 91
Appendix G. Study 3: Instructions and sample items for Rating 2 – Concreteness 92
Appendix H. Study 3: Instructions and sample items for Rating 2 – Grammatical acceptability 93
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject擴散張量影像zh_TW
dc.subject事件相關電位zh_TW
dc.subject腦功能側化zh_TW
dc.subject詞性zh_TW
dc.subject語意歧義zh_TW
dc.subject老化zh_TW
dc.subjectDiffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI)en
dc.subjectAgingen
dc.subjectSemantic ambiguityen
dc.subjectWord classen
dc.subjectHemispheric lateralizationen
dc.subjectEvent-related potential (ERP)en
dc.title健康老齡化對違反預期的語言訊息理解之影響zh_TW
dc.titleMaking Sense of Linguistic Unexpectedness in Healthy Agingen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree博士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee李佳頴;龔書萍;吳恩賜;徐峻賢zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChia-Ying Lee;Shu-Ping Gong;Joshua Oon Soo Goh;Chun-Hsien Hsuen
dc.subject.keyword老化,語意歧義,詞性,腦功能側化,事件相關電位,擴散張量影像,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordAging,Semantic ambiguity,Word class,Hemispheric lateralization,Event-related potential (ERP),Diffusion Tensor Imaging (DTI),en
dc.relation.page93-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202404263-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-08-13-
dc.contributor.author-college文學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept語言學研究所-
dc.date.embargo-lift2029-08-12-
顯示於系所單位:語言學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
2.38 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved