Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 健康政策與管理研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94802
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor鄭雅文zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorYa-Wen Chengen
dc.contributor.author李柏緯zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorPo-Wei Leeen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-19T16:35:56Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-20-
dc.date.copyright2024-08-19-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-07-30-
dc.identifier.citationBertino, V., Nisticò, V., D'Agostino, A., Priori, A., Gambini, O., & Demartini, B. (2021). Telework during COVID-19 outbreak: Impact on mental health among Italian workers. International Journal of Healthcare, 7(2), 29-41.
Bhaskara, A., Marhadi, M., & Fajar, A. (2020). Identifying the Relationship between The Big Five Personality Traits and Attitudes towards Teleworking of Generation Z.
Bhattacharya, S., Bashar, M. A., Srivastava, A., & Singh, A. (2019). Nomophobia: No mobile phone phobia. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 8(4), 1297- 1300.
Buomprisco, G., Ricci, S., Perri, R., & De Sio, S. (2021). Health and Telework: New Challenges after COVID-19 Pandemic. European Journal of Environment and Public Health, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.21601/ejeph/9705
Clark, L. A., Karau, S. J., & Michalisin, M. D. (2012). Telecommuting attitudes and the ‘big five’personality dimensions. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 13(3), 31-46.
Davis, K. G., Kotowski, S. E., Daniel, D., Gerding, T., Naylor, J., & Syck, M. (2020). The Home Office: Ergonomic Lessons From the “New Normal”. Ergonomics in Design, 28(4), 4-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1064804620937907
de Oliveira, T. C. d. S., Muzeka, A. L. P., Batista, E., dos Santos, G. N. F. E., Rocha, L. F. I. d., Legey, Â. L. C., Klein, A. A., & Motter, A. A. (2022). Worker health impacts from working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. Work, 72, 9-17. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210553
De Sio, S., Cedrone, F., Nieto, H., Lapteva, E., Perri, R., Greco, E., Mucci, N., Pacella, E., & Buomprisco, G. (2021). Telework and its effects on mental healt during the COVID-19 lockdown. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 25(10), 3914-3922.
Derogatis, L. R., Lipman, R. S., & Covi, L. (1973). SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale–preliminary report. Psychopharmacol Bull, 9(1), 13-28.
El Kadri Filho, F., & Lucca, S. R. (2022). Telework Conditions, Ergonomic and Psychosocial Risks, and Musculoskeletal Problems in the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Occup Environ Med, 64(12), e811-e817. https://doi.org/10.1097/jom.0000000000002704
European Commission, E. (2024). Employed persons working from home as a percentage of the total employment, by sex, age and professional status (%). http://data.europa.eu/88u/dataset/orjjzgdf3cnximvsokdfxw
Evanoff, B. A., Strickland, J. R., Dale, A. M., Hayibor, L., Page, E., Duncan, J. G., Kannampallil, T., & Gray, D. L. (2020). Work-related and personal factors associated with mental well-being during the COVID-19 response: survey of health care and other workers. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(8), e21366.
Gerding, T., Syck, M., Daniel, D., Naylor, J., Kotowski, S. E., Gillespie, G. L., Freeman, A. M., Huston, T. R., & Davis, K. G. (2021). An assessment of ergonomic issues in the home offices of university employees sent home due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Work, 68, 981-992. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-205294
Hong, Q. N., Li, J., Kersalé, M., Dieterlen, E., Mares, A., Ahmadian Sangkar, Z., Paquet, V., Lederer, V., Laberge, M., & Coutu, M.-F. (2024). Work Disability and Musculoskeletal Disorders Among Teleworkers: A Scoping Review. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 1-13.
ILO. (2020a). Defining and measuring remote work, telework, work at home and home- based work.
ILO. (2020b). Practical Guide on Teleworking during the COVID- 19 pandemic and beyond.
Labor., U. S. B. o. (2024). Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/telework.htm
Larrea-Araujo, C., Ayala-Granja, J., Vinueza-Cabezas, A., & Acosta-Vargas, P. (2021). Ergonomic Risk Factors of Teleworking in Ecuador during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(10), 5063. https://www.mdpi.com/1660- 4601/18/10/5063
MacLean, K. F. E., Neyedli, H. F., Dewis, C., & Frayne, R. J. (2022). The role of at home workstation ergonomics and gender on musculoskeletal pain. Work, 71, 309-318. https://doi.org/10.3233/WOR-210692
Mendonça, I., Coelho, F., Ferrajão, P., & Abreu, A. M. (2022). Telework and Mental Health during COVID-19. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 19(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19052602
Meymandpour, R., & Bagheri, Z. (2017). A study of personality traits, viz., extraversion and introversion on telecommuters burnout. Telecom Bus. Rev, 10(1), 1.
Microsoft. (2021). The Next Great Disruption Is Hybrid Work – Are We Ready?. Retrieved 8.29 from https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/worklab/work-trend- index/hybrid-work
Mokhtarian, P. L., & Varma, K. V. (1998). The trade-off between trips and distance traveled in analyzing the emissions impacts of center-based telecommuting. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 3(6), 419-428. 53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(98)00018-2
Nakrošienė, A., Bučiūnienė, I., & Goštautaitė, B. (2019). Working from home: characteristics and outcomes of telework. International Journal of Manpower, 40(1), 87-101.
Nemțeanu, M. S., & Dabija, D. C. (2023). Negative Impact of Telework, Job Insecurity, and Work-Life Conflict on Employee Behaviour. Int J Environ Res Public Health, 20(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20054182
Nilles, J. M. (1975). Telecommunications and Organizational Decentralization. e IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23(10), 1142-1147.
Nilles, J. M. (1994). Making telecommuting happen: A guide for telemanagers and telecommuters. Van Nostrand Reinhold.
OPM. (2010). Status of Telework in the Federal Government Report to Congress. Soares, S., Bonnet, F., Berg, J., & Labouriau, R. (2021). From potential to practice: Preliminary findings on the numbers of workers working from home during the COVID-19 pandemic. ILO policy brief WCMS, 765806.
Union., E. (2020). Telework in the EU before and after the COVID-19: where we were, where we head to. Retrieved from https://joint-research- centre.ec.europa.eu/document/download/1ccf7717-ab52-4215-b14a- 08d74e9d44fc_en
Vargas-Llave, O., Mandl, I., Weber, T., & Wilkens, M. (2020). Telework and ICT-based mobile work: Flexible working in the digital age. New Forms of Employment Series, 57.
Vitola, A., & Christopoulos, G. (2023). Telework Trends in Europe: Who are Up-and- Coming, Leaders, Losing Ground or Laggards? Baltic Journal of Real Estate Economics and Construction Management, 11, 305-314. https://doi.org/10.2478/bjreecm-2023-0019
Xanthopoulou, P., Patitsa, C., Tsaknis, P., Sotiropoulou, K., Giannakouli, V., Sahinidis, A., & Gkika, E. C. (2023). Exploring Gender Differences: The Relationship Between Personality and Teleworking Preferences. The International Conference on Strategic Innovative Marketing and Tourism.
Xiao, Y., Becerik-Gerber, B., Lucas, G., & Roll, S. C. (2021). Impacts of Working From Home During COVID-19 Pandemic on Physical and Mental Well-Being of Office Workstation Users. J Occup Environ Med, 63(3), 181-190. https://doi.org/10.1097 jom.0000000000002097
行政院主計處. (2020). 平均每戶家庭收支按區域別分. Retrieved from https://ws.dgbas.gov.tw/win/fies/a11.asp?year=109
李貞嫺、彭佳玲. (2022). 勞動環境安全衛生認知調查-2022 年.
許沛瀅. (2023). 探討遠距工作者的工作品質與健康影響: 質性訪談. 許雲翔、成之約等人. (2022). 遠距工作趨勢與勞動權益保障之國際經驗研析. 勞動部委託研究報告 Retrieved from https://www.mol.gov.tw/1607/28752/28764/28766/36075/
勞動部. 職業名稱代碼一覽表. Retrieved from https://statdb.mol.gov.tw/html/svy06/0635occ_num.pdf
勞動部. (2021). 居家工作職業安全衛生參考指引. Retrieved from https://www.osha.gov.tw/48110/48713/48735/148082/post
勞動部. (2024). 勞動基準法權益簡介. https://www.mol.gov.tw/1607/28162/28166/28168/28170/28989/
數位發展部. (2020). 109 年鄉鎮市區數位發展分類報告. https://www- api.moda.gov.tw/File/Get/moda/zh-tw/a8GFGMlOV35oeoY
數位發展部. (2023). 111 年數位發展調查. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6141/TW- SRDA-AE010019-1
蔡益堅. (2002). 自覺健康狀況—以簡表-36 (SF-36) 評估. 民國九十年國民健康訪 問調查初步研究成果. 台北: 國民健康局.
蕭怡欣. (2021). 遠距工作文獻回顧 [A Review of Telework Research]. 科技與人力 教育季刊, 7(3), 82-96. https://doi.org/10.6587/JTHRE.202103_7(3).0004
賴偉文. (2020). 新冠肺炎下新工作模式的轉變. 經濟前瞻(189), 25-30. https://www.AiritiLibrary.com/Publication/Index/10190376-202005- 202005210007-202005210007-25-30
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94802-
dc.description.abstract研究目的:遠距工作者可能因工作環境、主管遠端監控、長期使用資通訊技術進行工作等因素而產生身心健康上的問題,但臺灣現有的文獻較少關注遠距工作者 的工作與身心健康狀況。本研究首先針對臺灣的遠距工作者進行網路問卷調查, 探討遠距工作者之工作狀況與身心健康狀況之關聯性,進而以 2022 年勞動部的 調查資料做為對照,比較遠距工作者與一般工作者在工作與身心健康上的差異。
研究方法:本研究於 2024 年 3 月 6 日至 2024 年 3 月 27 日進行網路問卷的收案,研究對象為有固定雇主的受僱者,且一週有三天或以上不需進辦公室工作、 遠距工作年資滿一年或以上,且調查時仍持續遠距工作之 20-65 歲的遠距工作 者。問卷內容包含基本人口學資料、工作狀況與身心健康。本研究共回收有效樣本383 份,並與勞動部在 2022 年進行的「勞動環境安全衛生認知調查」進行描 述性比較分析。接著以複羅吉斯回歸模型,分析遠距工作者的工作狀況與身心健康之相關。另將本調查 383 位受訪者依其性別、年齡,自勞動部 2022 年「勞動環境安全衛生認知調查」選取配對樣本,針對眼睛痠痛、肌肉骨骼疼痛、自評健康狀況與心理健康狀況進行複羅吉斯回歸分析。
研究結果:遠距工作者多集中於 25-34 歲(59.27%),並以大學學歷(69.19%) 為多數;行業以專業、科學及技術服務業(29.77%)為最多;職業則以專業人員 (56.92%)與白領技術人員(27.15%)為多數;公司規模多為中大型公司,員工與主管多居住於北部地區;多數遠距工作者對遠距工作的滿意度高,並傾向日後繼續採遠距或部分遠距的工作型態。複羅吉斯回歸中發現每日平均工時≥ 10 小時的遠距工作者,心理健康不佳的風險顯著高於每日平均工時< 10 小時的遠距工作者。平均總年收入 40-65 萬與 65 萬以上的遠距工作者在眼睛痠痛、肌肉骨骼疼痛 與心理健康不佳的風險皆顯著高於平均總年收入未滿 40 萬的遠距工作者。員工能參與決定是否遠距工作的遠距工作者在眼睛痠痛與肌肉骨骼疼痛的風險顯著低於由主管決定的遠距工作者。相較一般工作者而言,遠距工作者產生眼睛不適問題較高、肌肉骨骼問題較高與心理健康不佳。複羅吉斯回歸則顯示進行遠距工作的工作者,其眼睛痠痛、肌肉骨骼疼痛與心理健康不佳的風險均顯著高於一般工作者。
結論:本研究發現每日平均工時、平均總年收入與遠距工作自願性皆會影響遠距工作者的身心健康,且多數遠距工作者都希望能夠繼續全遠距工作或大部分時間遠距工作,但研究也發現遠距工作者在身體健康與心理健康狀況相較一般工作者皆明顯較不佳,期能藉由此研究提升國內對於遠距工作者健康的關注,尤其考量遠距工作型態日益盛行。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractObjective: Teleworkers may experience physical health and mental health issues due to factors such as their work environment, remote supervision by supervisors, and long-term use of information and communication technology (ICT) for work. However, existing literature in Taiwan has rarely examined their work conditions and health status. This study first conducted an online survey of teleworkers in Taiwan to explore the relationship between teleworkers' work conditions and their physical and mental health and then compared these findings with data from the 2022 Ministry of Labor survey to examine the differences in work conditions and health status between teleworkers and general workers.
Methods: This study conducted an online survey from March 6, 2024, to March 27, 2024, targeting employed individuals aged 20-65 years who have fixed employers, work remotely for three or more days per week, have at least one year of telework experience, and continue to telework at the time of the survey. The questionnaire included basic demographics, work conditions, physical and mental health. A total of 383 valid samples were collected and descriptively compared with findings of a nationwide survey of general workers conducted by the Ministry of Labor in 2022. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between teleworkers' work conditions and their physical and mental health. Furthermore, an age- and sex- matched sample was drawn from the nationwide survey to facilitate comparison analyses between teleworkers and general workers on eye strain, musculoskeletal pain, self-assessed health status, and mental health status.
Results: Our findings indicated that teleworkers were mainly young people in the 25-34 age range (59.27%), and mostly held a university degree (69.19%). The majority of them were professionals (56.92%) and white-collar skilled workers (27.15%) in the professional, scientific, and technical service industries (29.77%), and their firm sizes were mostly medium to large, and teleworkers and supervisors were mostly located in the northern region of Taiwan. Most teleworkers were highly satisfied with telework and inclined to continue teleworking or partially teleworking in the future. Multiple logistic regression analysis found that teleworkers with average daily working hours of ≥10 hours had a significantly higher risk of poor mental health compared to those with <10 hours. Teleworkers with an average annual income of 400,000-650,000 TWD and above 650,000 TWD had a significantly higher risk of eye strain, musculoskeletal pain, and poor mental health compared to those with less than 400,000 TWD. Teleworkers who could decide whether to telework had a significantly lower risk of eye strain and musculoskeletal pain compared to those whose telework was decided by their employers. Compared to general workers, teleworkers had higher rates of eye discomfort, musculoskeletal problems, and poor mental health. Multiple logistic regression also showed that teleworkers had significantly higher risks of eye strain, musculoskeletal pain, and poor mental health compared to general workers.
Conclusion: This study found that working hours, annual income, and voluntariness of telework were factors that influenced the physical and mental health of teleworkers. Most teleworkers wish to continue fully teleworking or partially teleworking in the future. However, the study also found that teleworkers have significantly poorer physical and mental health compared to general workers. This research highlights the importance of paying more attention to teleworkers' health status as such a work pattern is gaining popularity.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-19T16:35:55Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-08-19T16:35:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員審定書 i
致謝 ii
摘要 iii
Abstract v
圖次 ix
表次 ix
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究動機與目的 4
第二章 文獻探討 5
第一節 遠距工作定義 5
第二節 國內外遠距工作現況 7
一、 國際遠距工作現況 7
二、 國內遠距工作現況 7
第三節 遠距工作與健康之研究 10
一、 遠距工作者工作環境與健康影響 10
二、 遠距工作可能造成的社會心理健康影響 11
三、 社會人口特質 13
第三章 研究方法 15
第一節 研究架構 15
第二節 研究設計與研究對象 16
一、 量性問卷調查 16
二、 次級資料分析-2022 年勞動環境安全衛生認知調查 16
第三節 研究工具 18
一、 工作狀況 18
二、 健康狀況 19
三、 基本人口學資料 20
第四節 問卷資料處理與分析 21
第五節 研究倫理 21
第四章 研究結果 22
第一節 遠距工作與國內工作者的人口特質比較 22
第二節 遠距工作者的其他人口特質與工作狀況 27
第三節 遠距工作者的工作狀況與身心健康之關聯性 33
第四節 遠距工作者與國內工作者的身心健康之比較 38
第五章 討論 41
第一節 遠距工作者之人口特質與工作狀況 41
第二節 遠距工作者之工作狀況、工作型態與身體健康 43
第三節 遠距工作者之工作狀況、工作型態與心理健康 45
第六章 結論與建議 47
第一節 研究優點與限制 47
第一節 建議 49
一、 政策建議 49
二、 未來研究建議 51
三、 結論 51
參考文獻 52
附錄一 研究問卷 58
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject遠距工作者zh_TW
dc.subject工作狀況zh_TW
dc.subject身心健康zh_TW
dc.subject調查zh_TW
dc.subjectsurveyen
dc.subjectteleworkersen
dc.subjectworking conditionsen
dc.subjectphysical and mental healthen
dc.title遠距工作者的工作狀況與身心健康調查研究zh_TW
dc.titleA Survey on Working Conditions and Health Status of Teleworkersen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee鄭婉汝;林若婷zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeWan-Ju Cheng;Ro-Ting Linen
dc.subject.keyword遠距工作者,工作狀況,身心健康,調查,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordteleworkers,working conditions,physical and mental health,survey,en
dc.relation.page59-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202402408-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-07-30-
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept健康政策與管理研究所-
顯示於系所單位:健康政策與管理研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
1.37 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved