Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 醫學院
  3. 微生物學科所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94752
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor王錦堂zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorJin-Town Wangen
dc.contributor.author羅彥茹zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorYen-Ju Loen
dc.date.accessioned2024-08-16T17:59:36Z-
dc.date.available2024-08-17-
dc.date.copyright2024-08-16-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-07-15-
dc.identifier.citation1. Iglewski., B.H., Pseudomonas, in Medical Microbiology. , B. S, Editor. 1996, University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston: Galveston (TX).
2. Moore, N.M. and M.L. Flaws, Introduction: Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Clin Lab Sci, 2011. 24(1): p. 41-42.
3. Thi, M.T.T., D. Wibowo, and B.H.A. Rehm, Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms. Int J Mol Sci, 2020. 21(22).
4. Drenkard, E., Antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms. Microbes Infect, 2003. 5(13): p. 1213-1219.
5. Amankwah, S., et al., Assessment of Phage-Mediated Inhibition and Removal of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilm on Medical Implants. Infect Drug Resist, 2022. 15: p. 2797-2811.
6. Hoggarth, A., et al., Mechanistic research holds promise for bacterial vaccines and phage therapies for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Drug Des Devel Ther, 2019. 13: p. 909-924.
7. Sadikot, R.T., et al., Pathogen-host interactions in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2005. 171(11): p. 1209-1223.
8. Reynolds, D. and M. Kollef, The Epidemiology and Pathogenesis and Treatment of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: An Update. Drugs, 2021. 81(18): p. 2117-2131.
9. CDC, Antibiotic Resistance Threats in the United States, CDC, Editor. 2019, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA.
10. CDC, COVID-19: U.S. Impact on Antimicrobial Resistance, Special Report 2022., CDC, Editor. 2022, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Atlanta, GA.
11. 台灣醫院感染管制與抗藥性監測管理系統(THAS 系統)2022 年 第 4 季 監視報告. 2023, 衛生福利部疾病管制署: 台灣.
12. 台灣抗生素抗藥性 監測年報. 2022, 衛生福利部疾病管制署: 台灣.
13. CDC, CRPA Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, CDC, Editor. 2023, U.S. Department of Health and Human services: Atlanta, GA.
14. Mancuso, G., et al., Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance: The Most Critical Pathogens. Pathogens, 2021. 10(10).
15. Holger, D., et al., Clinical Pharmacology of Bacteriophage Therapy: A Focus on Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections. Antibiotics (Basel), 2021. 10(5).
16. Clokie, M.R., et al., Phages in nature. Bacteriophage, 2011. 1(1): p. 31-45.
17. Kasman, L.M. and L.D. Porter, Bacteriophages, in StatPearls. 2023, StatPearls Publishing
Copyright © 2023, StatPearls Publishing LLC.: Treasure Island (FL).
18. Dion, M.B., F. Oechslin, and S. Moineau, Phage diversity, genomics and phylogeny. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2020. 18(3): p. 125-138.
19. Nobrega, F.L., et al., Targeting mechanisms of tailed bacteriophages. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2018. 16(12): p. 760-773.
20. Klumpp, J., M. Dunne, and M.J. Loessner, A perfect fit: Bacteriophage receptor-binding proteins for diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Current Opinion in Microbiology, 2023. 71: p. 102240.
21. Bertozzi Silva, J., Z. Storms, and D. Sauvageau, Host receptors for bacteriophage adsorption. FEMS Microbiol Lett, 2016. 363(4).
22. Daugelavicius, R., et al., Penetration of enveloped double-stranded RNA bacteriophages phi13 and phi6 into Pseudomonas syringae cells. J Virol, 2005. 79(8): p. 5017-5026.
23. Gorzelnik, K.V. and J. Zhang, Cryo-EM reveals infection steps of single-stranded RNA bacteriophages. Prog Biophys Mol Biol, 2021. 160: p. 79-86.
24. Meng, R., et al., Structural basis for the adsorption of a single-stranded RNA bacteriophage. Nat Commun, 2019. 10(1): p. 3130.
25. Du Toit, A., Viral infection: The language of phages. Nat Rev Microbiol, 2017. 15(3): p. 134-135.
26. Liu, S., et al., Phages against Pathogenic Bacterial Biofilms and Biofilm-Based Infections: A Review. Pharmaceutics, 2022. 14(2).
27. Kortright, K.E., et al., Phage Therapy: A Renewed Approach to Combat Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria. Cell Host Microbe, 2019. 25(2): p. 219-232.
28. Hatfull, G.F., R.M. Dedrick, and R.T. Schooley, Phage Therapy for Antibiotic-Resistant Bacterial Infections. Annu Rev Med, 2022. 73: p. 197-211.
29. WHO publishes list of bacteria for which new antibiotics are urgently needed. 2017, World Health Organization: GENEVA.
30. Luong, T., A.C. Salabarria, and D.R. Roach, Phage Therapy in the Resistance Era: Where Do We Stand and Where Are We Going? Clin Ther, 2020. 42(9): p. 1659-1680.
31. Strathdee, S.A., et al., Phage therapy: From biological mechanisms to future directions. Cell, 2023. 186(1): p. 17-31.
32. Żaczek, M., B. Weber-Dąbrowska, and A. Górski, Phages in the global fruit and vegetable industry. J Appl Microbiol, 2015. 118(3): p. 537-556.
33. Abedon, S.T., et al., Editorial: Phage Therapy: Past, Present and Future. Front Microbiol, 2017. 8: p. 981.
34. Brives, C. and J. Pourraz, Phage therapy as a potential solution in the fight against AMR: obstacles and possible futures. Palgrave Communications, 2020. 6(1): p. 100.
35. Uyttebroek, S., et al., Safety and efficacy of phage therapy in difficult-to-treat infections: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis, 2022. 22(8): p. e208-e220.
36. Chang, C., et al., Bacteriophage-Mediated Control of Biofilm: A Promising New Dawn for the Future. Front Microbiol, 2022. 13: p. 825828.
37. Vollmer, W. and U. Bertsche, Murein (peptidoglycan) structure, architecture and biosynthesis in Escherichia coli. Biochim Biophys Acta, 2008. 1778(9): p. 1714-1734.
38. Cheng, X., et al., The structure of bacteriophage T7 lysozyme, a zinc amidase and an inhibitor of T7 RNA polymerase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1994. 91(9): p. 4034-4038.
39. Briers, Y., et al., Muralytic activity and modular structure of the endolysins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa bacteriophages phiKZ and EL. Mol Microbiol, 2007. 65(5): p. 1334-1344.
40. Walmagh, M., et al., Characterization of modular bacteriophage endolysins from Myoviridae phages OBP, 201φ2-1 and PVP-SE1. PLoS One, 2012. 7(5): p. e36991.
41. Guo, M., et al., A Novel Antimicrobial Endolysin, LysPA26, against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Front Microbiol, 2017. 8: p. 293.
42. Topka-Bielecka, G., et al., Bacteriophage-Derived Depolymerases against Bacterial Biofilm. Antibiotics (Basel), 2021. 10(2).
43. Stirm, S., et al., Isolation of spike-formed particles from bacteriophage lysates. Virology, 1971. 45(1): p. 303-308.
44. Lai, M.J., et al., The Tail Associated Protein of Acinetobacter baumannii Phage ΦAB6 Is the Host Specificity Determinant Possessing Exopolysaccharide Depolymerase Activity. PLoS One, 2016. 11(4): p. e0153361.
45. Knirel, Y.A., et al., Mechanisms of Acinetobacter baumannii Capsular Polysaccharide Cleavage by Phage Depolymerases. Biochemistry (Mosc), 2020. 85(5): p. 567-574.
46. Kimura, K. and Y. Itoh, Characterization of poly-gamma-glutamate hydrolase encoded by a bacteriophage genome: possible role in phage infection of Bacillus subtilis encapsulated with poly-gamma-glutamate. Appl Environ Microbiol, 2003. 69(5): p. 2491-2497.
47. Olszak, T., et al., The O-specific polysaccharide lyase from the phage LKA1 tailspike reduces Pseudomonas virulence. Scientific Reports, 2017. 7(1): p. 16302.
48. Davies, G. and B. Henrissat, Structures and mechanisms of glycosyl hydrolases. Structure, 1995. 3(9): p. 853-859.
49. Sutherland, I.W., Polysaccharide lyases. FEMS Microbiology Reviews, 1995. 16(4): p. 323-347.
50. Pires, D.P., et al., Bacteriophage-encoded depolymerases: their diversity and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 2016. 100(5): p. 2141-2151.
51. Guo, Z., M. Liu, and D. Zhang, Potential of phage depolymerase for the treatment of bacterial biofilms. Virulence, 2023. 14(1): p. 2273567.
52. Wu, J.W., et al., Identification of three capsule depolymerases in a bacteriophage infecting Klebsiella pneumoniae capsular types K7, K20, and K27 and therapeutic application. J Biomed Sci, 2023. 30(1): p. 31.
53. Lin, T.L., et al., Development of Klebsiella pneumoniae Capsule Polysaccharide-Conjugated Vaccine Candidates Using Phage Depolymerases. Front Immunol, 2022. 13: p. 843183.
54. Chung, K.M., S.C. Nang, and S.S. Tang, The Safety of Bacteriophages in Treatment of Diseases Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria. Pharmaceuticals (Basel), 2023. 16(10).
55. Penziner, S., R.T. Schooley, and D.T. Pride, Animal Models of Phage Therapy. Front Microbiol, 2021. 12: p. 631794.
56. Wang, S.y., et al., Pharmacokinetics and safety evaluation of intravenously administered Pseudomonas phage PA_LZ7 in a mouse model. Microbiol Spectr, 2024. 12(1): p. e0188223.
57. Yang, Y., et al., Characterization of the first double-stranded RNA bacteriophage infecting Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci Rep, 2016. 6: p. 38795.
58. Bae, H.W., S.Y. Choi, and Y.H. Cho, An outer membrane determinant for RNA phage genome entry in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. iScience, 2024. 27(1): p. 108675.
59. Gentry-Shields, J. and L.-A. Jaykus, Comparison of process control viruses for use in extraction and detection of human norovirus from food matrices. Food Research International, 2015. 77: p. 320-325.
60. Lee, K.M., et al., A Genetic Screen Reveals Novel Targets to Render Pseudomonas aeruginosa Sensitive to Lysozyme and Cell Wall-Targeting Antibiotics. Front Cell Infect Microbiol, 2017. 7: p. 59.
61. Bhatwa, A., et al., Challenges Associated With the Formation of Recombinant Protein Inclusion Bodies in Escherichia coli and Strategies to Address Them for Industrial Applications. Front Bioeng Biotechnol, 2021. 9: p. 630551.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94752-
dc.description.abstract綠膿桿菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa)是一種革蘭氏陰性的需氧桿菌,常見於潮濕的環境,它也是最常見造成醫療相關感染的原因之一。近年來多重抗藥性綠膿桿菌已對公共衛生形成嚴重威脅,而噬菌體療法被視為最有潛力作為抗生素替代性療法的候選人。噬菌體是一種可以感染細菌的病毒,可專一性感染特定宿主菌株,依其生命週期可以分為潛溶型噬菌體以及裂解型噬菌體,而其中,裂解型噬菌體又被視為噬菌體療法中最理想的噬菌體種類。噬菌體療法在早期曾廣泛應用,但抗生素普及後逐漸被忽視。然而近年來由於抗藥性菌株的氾濫問題使噬菌體療法再度受到關注。
本研究首先從環境水源中分離並純化獲得數株噬菌體,經過測試後找到兩株擁有廣泛宿主範圍(Host range)的噬菌體,分別命名為P23以及P49。毒殺試驗(Phage killing assay)的結果顯示P23對臨床分離出的綠膿桿菌具有良好的殺菌效果,且對於部分臨床分離的綠膿桿菌具有清除生物膜的能力。另P23亦有進行進行動物實驗,然而由於感染複數(Multiplicity of infection,MOI)偏低,治療效果並不如預期。除此之外,噬菌體P23屬於RNA噬菌體,而目前在抽取噬菌體RNA仍較困難,因此未成功取得P23之基因組。P49則是在經過定序後,選擇針對其溶菌素(Endolysin)以及兩種尾纖維蛋白(Tail fiber proteins)進行基因重組蛋白的表現(Recombinant protein expression)。命名重組溶菌素為M16,尾纖維蛋白TFP1+2及TFP3+4。其中,兩種尾纖維蛋白皆為水溶性極低的內涵體(Inclusion bodies),而M16則是對26株綠膿桿菌菌株皆無直接溶菌的活性。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractPseudomonas aeruginosa is a Gram-negative bacterium commonly found in moist environments, it is also considered as one of the most important causes of healthcare-associated infections. In recent years, multidrug-resistant P. aeruginosa has become a serious issue in public health. Phages are viruses that can infect bacteria, with the specificity to infect their hosts, they do no harm to normal microbiota in human bodies, which makes them a promising alternative treatment strategy to antibiotics. According to their different life cycles, they can be classified as either lysogenic or lytic phages, with lytic phages being the most ideal candidates for phage therapy. Phage therapy was widely used in the past, but its popularity declined with the advent of antibiotics. However, due to the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria strains, phage therapy has regained its attention.
This study first isolated and purified several phages from sewages from NTUH, two phages with the broad host range were selected and named P23 and P49. The results of the phage killing assay demonstrated that phage P23 could effectively kill clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa., it also proved its abilities of cleaning biofilm from a few clinical isolated P. aeruginosa. Additionally, in vivo animal experiment for phage P23 was also conducted. However, due to the low MOI, the result was not as effective as anticipated.
However, due to the difficulties of extracting phage genomic RNA, the genomic sequence of phage P23 could not be obtained. As for P49, after whole-genome sequencing, efforts were focused on expressing recombinant proteins of its putative endolysin, and two tail fiber proteins. The recombinant endolysin was named M16, and the recombinant tail fiber proteins were named TFP1+2 and TFP3+4. Among the three of them, both TFP1+2 and TFP3+4 showed low solubilities and turned out to be inclusion bodies, and M16 showed no lytic activity against the 26 clinical isolated P. aeruginosa strains.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-16T17:59:36Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-08-16T17:59:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents謝辭 I
中文摘要 II
Abstract III
目 次 V
圖 次 VII
表 次 VIII
第一章、緒論 1
1.1 綠膿桿菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa) 1
1.2 噬菌體 (Bacteriophages) 2
1.3 噬菌體療法(Phage therapy) 3
1.4 噬菌體溶菌素與多醣類分解酵素之臨床應用潛力 4
第二章、實驗方法與材料 6
2.1 實驗材料 6
2.1.1 菌株 6
2.1.2水源 6
2.1.3 培養基與抗生素 6
2.1.4 試劑 6
2.2 實驗方法 9
2.2.1 從環境與水源中分離噬菌體 9
2.2.2 塗點試驗(Spot test) 9
2.2.3 溶菌斑試驗(Plaque assay) 9
2.2.4 噬菌體增殖(Broth amplification) 10
2.2.5 噬菌體毒殺試驗(Phage killing assay) 10
2.2.6 抗生物膜試驗(Anti-biofilm assay) 10
2.2.7 噬菌體DNA萃取 11
2.2.8 限制性核酸內切酶實驗 12
2.2.9 噬菌體RNA萃取 12
2.2.10 動物實驗 13
2.2.11 噬菌體全基因體定序(Whole genome sequencing)及分析 13
2.2.12 聚合酶連鎖反應(Polymerase chain reaction,PCR) 13
2.2.13 噬菌體P49重組蛋白質表現 14
2.2.14 十二烷基硫酸鈉聚丙烯醯胺凝膠電泳(SDS-PAGE) 15
第三章、實驗結果 16
3.1由環境水源進行噬菌體分離與純化 16
3.2噬菌體之宿主範圍(Host range) 16
3.3噬菌體毒殺試驗 16
3.4抗生物膜試驗 17
3.5以瓊脂凝膠電泳分析噬菌體基因體抽取之結果 17
3.6動物實驗 18
3.7 噬菌體P49全基因體定序結果 18
3.8溶菌素與多醣類分解酵素之blastx分析結果及基因選殖 18
3.9溶菌素M16之蛋白質純化及活性驗證 19
3.10重組多醣類分解酵素TFP1+2及TFP3+4之蛋白質純化 19
第四章、討論與未來展望 20
參考資料 22
附圖 30
附表 43
補充 48
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject噬菌體zh_TW
dc.subject綠膿桿菌zh_TW
dc.subject溶菌素zh_TW
dc.subject尾纖維蛋白zh_TW
dc.subject噬菌體療法zh_TW
dc.subjectphage therapyen
dc.subjecttail fiber proteinen
dc.subjectendolysinen
dc.subjectbacteriophageen
dc.subjectP. aeruginosaen
dc.title分離一株綠膿桿菌之噬菌體及鑑定可能的溶菌素zh_TW
dc.titleIsolation of a Phage Against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Characterization of Its Putative Endolysinen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee余佳慧;董馨蓮zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeChia-Hui Yu;Shin-lian Doongen
dc.subject.keyword綠膿桿菌,噬菌體,噬菌體療法,尾纖維蛋白,溶菌素,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordP. aeruginosa,bacteriophage,phage therapy,tail fiber protein,endolysin,en
dc.relation.page49-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202401773-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-07-16-
dc.contributor.author-college醫學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept微生物學研究所-
顯示於系所單位:微生物學科所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務)
3.59 MBAdobe PDF
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved