請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94684完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 荷世平 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Shih-Ping Ho | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 郭晉圻 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Jin-Qi Kuo | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-16T17:30:31Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-17 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-16 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-11 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 曾毓婕, & 羅時芳. (2022). 碳定價：企業可以怎麼做？. 經濟前瞻, 201, 17–22.
陳冠齡. (2020). 企業提升碳聲譽的因素與企業價值之關聯性. https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=6lPPGA/record?r1=3&h1=1#XXX 李堅明. (2019). 臺灣碳權交易與碳稅的未來. 會計研究月刊, 408. https://doi.org/10.6650/ARM.201911_(408).0016 李堅明. (2022). COP 26氣候峰會觀察與全球淨零排放因應. 會計研究月刊, 435, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.6650/ARM.202202_(435).0013 楊喻閔, & 李堅明. (2021). 內部碳定價之氣候風險效益評估－以台灣企業為例. https://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/ccd=euafz5/record?r1=1&h1=1 Aichele, R., & Felbermayr, G. (2013). The Effect of the Kyoto Protocol on Carbon Emissions. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(4), 731–757. Aldy, J. E., & Gianfranco, G. (2019). Future-Proof Your Climate Strategy. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2019/05/future-proof-your-climate-strategy Aupperle, K. E., Carroll, A. B., & Hatfield, J. D. (1985). An Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Corporate Social Responsibility and Profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 28(2), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.5465/256210 Ben-Amar, W., Gomes, M., Khursheed, H., & Marsat, S. (2022). Climate change exposure and internal carbon pricing adoption. Business Strategy and the Environment, 31(7), 2854–2870. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3051 Bento, N., & Gianfrate, G. (2020). Determinants of internal carbon pricing. Energy Policy, 143, 111499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111499 Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does Stakeholder Orientation Matter? The Relationship Between Stakeholder Management Models and Firm Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 488–506. https://doi.org/10.5465/256972 Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. University of Iowa Press. Byrd, J. W., Cooperman, E. S., & Hickman, K. (2020). Capital Budgeting and Climate Change: Does Corporate Internal Carbon Pricing Reduce CO2 Emissions (SSRN Scholarly Paper 3575769). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3575769 Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(91)90005-G CDP. (2017). How-To Guide To Corporate Internal Carbon Pricing. CDP. https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/reports/documents/000/002/740/original/cpu-2017-how-to-guide-to-internal-carbon-pricing.pdf?1521554897 CDP. (2021). Putting A Price On Carbon. https://www.cdp.net/en/research/global-reports/putting-a-price-on-carbon CDP. (2022). What Is Internal Carbon Pricing And How Can It Help Achieve Your Net-Zero Goal. https://cdn.cdp.net/cdp-production/cms/reports/documents/000/006/374/original/ICP_White_paper_Final_%281%29.pdf?1653572442 Chang, K. (2015). The impacts of environmental performance and propensity disclosure on financial performance: Empirical evidence from unbalanced panel data of heavy-pollution industries in China. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 8(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.3926/jiem.1240 Chang, V. (2017). Private firm incentives to adopt internal carbon pricing. Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal, 35(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2131 Coase, R. H. (1937). The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4(16), 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x Cochran, P. L., & Wood, R. A. (1984). Corporate Social Responsibility and Financial Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 27(1), 42–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/255956 Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary Nonfinancial Disclosure and the Cost of Equity Capital: The Initiation of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.00000005 EEA. (2022). Total greenhouse gas emission trends and projections in Europe (8th EAP). https://www.eea.europa.eu/ims/total-greenhouse-gas-emission-trends Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/256324 Friedlingstein, P., O’Sullivan, M., Jones, M. W., Andrew, R. M., Gregor, L., Hauck, J., Le Quéré, C., Luijkx, I. T., Olsen, A., Peters, G. P., Peters, W., Pongratz, J., Schwingshackl, C., Sitch, S., Canadell, J. G., Ciais, P., Jackson, R. B., Alin, S. R., Alkama, R., … Zheng, B. (2022). Global Carbon Budget 2022. Earth System Science Data, 14(11), 4811–4900. https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-14-4811-2022 Fujii, H., Iwata, K., Kaneko, S., & Managi, S. (2013). Corporate Environmental and Economic Performance of Japanese Manufacturing Firms: Empirical Study for Sustainable Development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(3), 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1747 Gajjar, C., & Adhia, V. (2018). Reducing Risk, Addressing Climate Change Through Internal Carbon Pricing: A Primer For Indian Business. Gillingham, K., Carattini, S., & Esty, D. (2017). Lessons from first campus carbon-pricing scheme. Nature, 551(7678), Article 7678. https://doi.org/10.1038/551027a Gorbach, O. G., Kost, C., & Pickett, C. (2022). Review of internal carbon pricing and the development of a decision process for the identification of promising Internal Pricing Methods for an Organisation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, 111745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111745 Harpankar, K. (2019). Internal carbon pricing: Rationale, promise and limitations. Carbon Management, 10(2), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583004.2019.1577178 IPCC. (2014a). Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis: Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324 IPCC. (2014b). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 收入 EPIC3Geneva, Switzerland, IPCC, 151 p., pp. 151, ISBN: 978-92-9169-143-2 (頁 151). IPCC. https://epic.awi.de/id/eprint/37530/ IPCC. (2023). AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023. https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/syr/ Kuo, L., & Chang, B.-G. (2021). Ambitious corporate climate action: Impacts of science-based target and internal carbon pricing on carbon management reputation-Evidence from Japan. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1830–1840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.025 Lacis, A. A., Schmidt, G. A., Rind, D., & Ruedy, R. A. (2010). Atmospheric CO2: Principal Control Knob Governing Earth’s Temperature. Science, 330(6002), 356–359. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1190653 Lister, J. (2018). The Policy Role of Corporate Carbon Management: Co-regulating Ecological Effectiveness. Global Policy, 9(4), 538–548. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12618 Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2014). Does voluntary carbon disclosure reflect underlying carbon performance? Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 10(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2014.08.003 Ma, J., & Kuo, J. (2021). Environmental self-regulation for sustainable development: Can internal carbon pricing enhance financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), 3517–3527. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2817 Maamoun, N. (2019). The Kyoto protocol: Empirical evidence of a hidden success. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 95, 227–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2019.04.001 Morice, C. P., Kennedy, J. J., Rayner, N. A., Winn, J. P., Hogan, E., Killick, R. E., Dunn, R. J. H., Osborn, T. J., Jones, P. D., & Simpson, I. R. (2021). An Updated Assessment of Near-Surface Temperature Change From 1850: The HadCRUT5 Data Set. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 126(3), e2019JD032361. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JD032361 NOAA, & US Department of Commerce. (2022). Global Monitoring Laboratory—Carbon Cycle Greenhouse Gases. https://gml.noaa.gov/ccgg/trends/global.html Okafor, A., Adeleye, B. N., & Adusei, M. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Evidence from U.S tech firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, 292, 126078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126078 Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910 Pigou, A. C. (1920). The Economics Of Welfare. Macmillan and Co., London. http://archive.org/details/dli.bengal.10689.4260 Porter, M. (1991). America’ Green Strategy. Scientific American. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0491-168 Riedel, F., Gorbach, G., & Kost, C. (2021). Barriers to internal carbon pricing in German companies. Energy Policy, 159, 112654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112654 Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F., & Fuenfschilling, L. (2020). Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change—And how “sustainability transition policy” can help. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004093117 Sheehy, B. (2015). Defining CSR: Problems and Solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 625–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x Stavins, R. N. (2022). The Relative Merits of Carbon Pricing Instruments: Taxes versus Trading. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 16(1), 62–82. https://doi.org/10.1086/717773 TCFD. (2017, 六月 29). Recommendations of Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures. https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/recommendations/ Trinks, A., Mulder, M., & Scholtens, B. (2022). External carbon costs and internal carbon pricing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 168, 112780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112780 UN. (2004). Who Cares Wins. UN. https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/events/2004/stocks/who_cares_wins_global_compact_2004.pdf UNFCCC. (2022). Climate Plans Remain Insufficient: More Ambitious Action Needed Now. https://unfccc.int/news/climate-plans-remain-insufficient-more-ambitious-action-needed-now UNIDO. (2023). What is CSR? https://www.unido.org/our-focus/advancing-economic-competitiveness/competitive-trade-capacities-and-corporate-responsibility/corporate-social-responsibility-market-integration/what-csr Wagner, M. (2010). The role of corporate sustainability performance for economic performance: A firm-level analysis of moderation effects. Ecological Economics, 69(7), 1553–1560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.02.017 WBCSD. (2015). Emerging Practices in Internal Carbon Pricing | A Practical Guide. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD). https://www.wbcsd.org/8hkg Wooldridge, J. (2019). Correlated random effects models with unbalanced panels. Journal of Econometrics, 211(1), 137–150. Wooldridge, J. M. (2012). Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. World Bank. (2023). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2023. https://doi.org/10.1596/39796 Zhu, B., Xu, C., Wang, P., & Zhang, L. (2022). How does internal carbon pricing affect corporate environmental performance? Journal of Business Research, 145, 65–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.02.071 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94684 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究以台灣上市櫃企業為對象，探討內部碳定價作為碳管理工具的有效性，並研究其對企業碳管理與財務績效的影響。我們從氣候風險和碳定價背景出發，將企業永續ESG發展作為理論基礎，並分析內部碳定價的來源、目的和實施方式。
此外，我們參考了相關文獻，分析了內部碳定價與碳排放強度、碳管理評分、以及財務績效的關聯性研究，同時我們也揭示了現有研究的不足與漏洞；更甚者，我們發現台灣對於企業採用內部碳定價的研究及應用，有著相對缺乏之隱憂，這樣的情況延伸出本研究欲解答和填補之研究缺口。 本研究以碳排放強度、碳管理評分和資產報酬率為應變數，以內部碳定價政策採用及內部碳價格設定為自變數，提出五個假說和相應實證模型。再透過收集2018至2021年間，83家台灣上市櫃企業之縱橫資料進行計量實證迴歸。 研究結果發現，台灣企業採用內部碳定價可降低碳排放強度及提高碳管理評分，此結果與文獻發現相符。而且，內部碳價格越高的企業其碳排放強度越低、碳管理評分越高。然而，採用內部碳定價並未對企業資產報酬率產生顯著正面影響。 總結而言，本研究認為提升台灣企業對內部碳定價的認識與採用將有助於改善其內部碳管理績效，並可以推廣與激勵整體社會以碳定價策略降低碳排放，以應對氣候風險，進一步打造低碳永續環境。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | This study, focusing on publicly listed companies in Taiwan, investigates the efficacy of Internal Carbon Pricing (ICP) as a carbon management tool and examines its impact on corporate carbon management and financial performance. We start from the perspective of climate risk and carbon pricing, taking the sustainable ESG development of enterprises as a theoretical basis, and analyze the source, purpose, and implementation methods of ICP.
Furthermore, relevant literature is referenced to analyze the relationship between ICP and carbon emission intensity, carbon management score, and financial performance. We also highlighted the gaps and deficiencies in existing research. Importantly, we identified a concern about the relative scarcity of research and implementation of ICP in Taiwanese enterprises, which led to the problems this study intends to address and the gaps it aims to fill. Our study uses carbon emission intensity, carbon management score, and Return on Assets (ROA) as dependent variables. With the adoption of ICP policy and the level of internal carbon prices as independent variables. Five hypotheses and corresponding empirical models are proposed. We conducted empirical regression through panel data collected from 83 Taiwanese listed companies from 2018 to 2021. Our results suggest that the adoption of ICP by Taiwanese enterprises can significantly reduce carbon emission intensity and improve the carbon management score, aligning with findings from existing literature. Furthermore, Companies setting higher internal carbon prices exhibit lower carbon emission intensity and higher carbon management scores. However, the adoption of ICP did not significantly affect the companies' ROA. In summary, this study suggests that enhancing the understanding and adoption of ICP in Taiwanese enterprises could improve their internal carbon management performance. This, in turn, could promote and encourage society to employ carbon pricing strategies to reduce carbon emissions, respond to climate risks, and further build a low-carbon and sustainable environment. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-16T17:30:31Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-16T17:30:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
口試委員會審定書 i 誌謝 ii 摘要 iii Abstract iv 目次 vi 圖次 ix 表次 xi 第1章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機與目的 2 1.3 研究限制 4 1.4 論文架構 5 第2章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 氣候相關風險 7 2.2 碳定價 12 2.3 企業永續發展 19 2.4 內部碳定價介紹 26 2.5 內部碳定價文獻 37 第3章 研究方法 44 3.1 計量實證研究法 44 3.2 研究流程 47 第4章 實證研究設計 50 4.1 假說推導 50 4.2 實證模型 55 4.3 變數說明與衡量方式 62 第5章 實證結果與討論 71 5.1 敘述性統計 71 5.2 模型檢定 73 5.3 假說一驗證與討論 78 5.4 假說二驗證與討論 87 5.5 假說三驗證與討論 94 5.6 綜合討論 99 第6章 研究結論與建議 102 6.1 研究結論 102 6.2 研究建議 103 參考文獻 105 附錄 112 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 以內部碳定價作為企業碳管理工具之效益實證：以臺灣為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Empirical Analysis of the Benefits of Internal Carbon Pricing as a Corporate Carbon Management Tool: Evidence from Taiwan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王全三;許耀文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chuan-San Wang;Yao-Wen Hsu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 內部碳定價,永續ESG,節能減碳,計量分析,實證研究, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Internal Carbon Pricing,Sustainability And ESG,Energy Conservation And Carbon Reduction,Quantitative Analysis,Empirical Research, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 138 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202302249 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-12 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 土木工程學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 土木工程學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 3.26 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。