請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94592
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 邱祈榮 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chyi-Rong Chiou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 加藤葉月 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | HAZUKI Kato | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-16T16:55:34Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-17 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-16 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-05 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Chinese
Chen, Y. W. (2012). The Political Economy of Forestland Policy in Taiwan 1945-2012. Department of Political Science College of Social Science National Taiwan University Master Thesis Chen, Y.C. (2000). Mei yuan yu taiwan zhi senlin baoyu(1950-1965)—meiguo yu zhonghuaminguo zhengfu guanwan xi zhi gean yanjiu[美援與台灣之森林保育(1950-1965)—美國與中華民國政府關係之個案研究. U.S. Aid and Forest Conservation in Taiwan (1950-1965) - A Case Study of U.S. Relations with the Republic of China Government]. Taiwan, Taipei: Daoxiang Chubanshe [稻鄉出版社]. Chiao, K. M. (1999). Zhong guo lin ye shi[中國林業史. History of Forestry in China]. Taiwan, Taipei: Bohaitang wenhua shiye[渤海堂文化事業]. Chiao, K. M. (2005). Linye zhenge yu linye xingzheng[林業政策與林業行政. Forestry Policy and Forestry Administration] . HUNG YEH PUBLISHING CO., LTD. Chiu, L.W., Huang, C.S., Wu, C.C., Hsieh, H.T. (2015). Di ci quanguo senlin ziyuan tiaochengguo gaiyao[第4次全國森林資源調查成果概要. Summary of Results of the 4th National Forest Resources Survey]. Taiwan Forestry Journal, 41(4), 3-13. Chuang, S. T., & Wu, C. S. (2004). 「Taiwan daxueshan linye gongsi」jiuzhicaichangqu xilie baodao(1)-「Daxueshan linye gongsi」di qiluo [「台灣大雪山林業公司 」舊製材廠區系列報導(一)-「台灣大雪山林業公司」的起落. A series of reports on the old timber factory of Taiwan Daxueshan Forestry Corporation (1) - The rise and fall of Taiwan Daxueshan Forestry Corporation.], Taiwan Forestry Journal, 30(2), 76-80 Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency, Distribution of Protection Forest in Taiwan 1101_2, Geo Resource Cloud Library, Retrieved April 23, 2023, from 1101https://mapportal.forest.gov.tw/portal/home/item.html?id=332e5dd43d204b788ee05655d4975928. Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency. (2023). Table of All Forest Nature Reserve Area, Retrieved September 24, 2022, from https://conservation.forest.gov.tw/total Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency, Ministry of Agriculture. (2016. July. 11) Dì 5 jie zaolin shengchan, linwuju juzhi[ 第五節 造林生産, 林務局局誌. Section 5: Silvicultural Production, Forest Bureau Logo]. Retrieved September 23, 2022, from https://www.forest.gov.tw/0001271/ Huang, C.T. (2022). The Coherence of "Sentiment, Rationality, and Law": The Underlying Thinking of Judiciary Judgments in Qing-Dynasty China and Its Reflection in the Contemporary Era. Chinese Legal History Society, 39, 313-354 Hsiao, H.H.(1983). Zong huanjing shehuixuetan yipan minzhong han lifa weiyuan dui huanjing wenti de renzhi[從環境社會學談一般民眾和立法委員對環境問題的認知. Environmental sociology on the awareness of the general public and legislators on environmental issues], Zhongguoluntan[中國論壇], 15(8), 44-49 Huang, K. J. 2005. A literature-review study on Transformation of Timber Production Institution in Taiwan. School of Forestry & Resource Conservation National Taiwan University, Master Thesis. Huang, S. L. (2009). Application of Protection Forest Revision Technique on the Land Management of Costal Windbreak Forest –A Case Study of Protection Forest 1201. Forestry Division, the Graduate Institute of Agriculture, College of Agriculture, National Chiayi University Master Thesis. Huang, Y. X. (1997). Taiwan linye jingying yu ziran baoyu[台灣林業經營與自然保育. Forest Management and Nature Conservation in Taiwan]. Taiwan Forestry Journal, 23(2), 6-14. Jen, I.A. (1983). An Analysis of Timber Price Fluctuations in Taiwan, TAIWAN FORESTRY RESEARCH LNSTITUTEBULLETIN, 395 Ke, Y.Y. (2003). Protection Forest Management of Outside the Working Circle of National Forest; All Illustration of 2204 Protection Forest for Water Conservation. Graduated from Department of Forestry, National Pintung University of Science and Technology Ministry of Agriculture, (2008). Taiwan nongdi gaiji zhengcedi huigu yu zhanwang[台灣農地改革政策的回顧與展望. Review and Prospect of Taiwan's Agricultural Land Reform Policy], Retrieved September 27, 2022, from https://www.coa.gov.tw/wsphp?id=17819 Ministry of Environment, 水源水質保護區, Retrieved November28, 2023, https://dwsiot.moenv.gov.tw/waterprotection_article_list Ministry of Environment, 全國飲用水水源水質保護區地理資訊網, Retrieved November29, 2023, https://wsserver.moenv.gov.tw/Index.aspx The Historical Research Commission of Taiwan Province. 1970. Taiwan Province General Records(4). Economy Forestry, 1 Tien, H. M., & Shiau, C. J. (1992). Taiwan's Democratization: A Summary, World Affairs, 155(2), Democracy in Taiwan: Part One (Fall 1992), 58-61 Tsai, F.C.(1999). A Study on Relationships between Deforestation and Forest Policies, from 1952 to 1992, School of Forestry & Resource Conservation National Taiwan University. Tseng, H.B. (1998). 1970niandai Taiwan ziyuan baoyu zhuyi zhi fazhan : yi zhengfu jiaose wei zhu zhi yanjiu[1970年代臺灣資源保育主義之發展: 以政府角色為主之研究. The Development of Resource Conservationism in Taiwan in the 1970s: A Study on the Role of the Government]. Thought and Words: Journal of the Humanities and Social Science, 36(3), 61-104 Wang, D.C., & Yang, Z. H.(1996) Qiantan benxing siyouyoulin shuifu[淺談本省私有林税賦. Taxation of private forests in the province]. Taiwan Forestry Journal, 33(6), 27-31 Yao, H.N. (2011). Taiwan Forestry History Series(Ⅱ), Taiwan Forestry Journal, 29(4), 58-73 Yao, H.N. (2011). Taiwan Forestry History Series(Ⅸ)-The Trajectory of Taiwan's Forestry Industry in the Past Century. Taiwan Forestry Journal, 30(1), 81-89 Yu, S.H. (1983). Forest Resources Management. Taiwan, Taipei: Jinming tushu youxian gongsi[金銘圖書有限公司] Zhang, J.D., & Wu, X.M. 2016. Taiwan baoanlin yange yu guanli jianjie [臺灣保安林沿革與管理簡介. History and Management of Protection Forests in Taiwan]. Taiwan Forestry Journal, 42(3), 14-23 Zheng, C.L. (1999). An analysis of deforestation in Taiwan since 1950s., National Taiwan University, School of Forestry Japanese Akaishi, K. (2019). Heisei30nendo Country Report: China, Korea, Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines, Thailand, India, Africa, Chapter 3: Taiwan Trends in Agricultural Trade. Policy Research Institute, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Agricultural Strategy of Major Countries Project Research Materials,11 Arai, N. (2021). Nihon no kankouseisaku no hensen to tenbou-korona syuusokugo no jizokukanou na kanko ni mukete-[日本の観光政策の変遷と展望―コロナ収束後の持続可能な観光に向けて―. Changes and Prospects of Japan's Tourism Policy: Toward Sustainable Tourism after the Corona Convergence]. Nara Prefectural University kenkyu kiho[ 奈良県立大学研究季報], 32(1), 1-40. Chen, L.C. (2001). Population, Industriazation and Urbanization of Taiwan after the World War Ⅱ〔Ⅰ〕,. Toa keizaikenkyu[東亞経濟研究], 60 (3), 181-200. Chiu, H. M.(2013). Taiwan kankyo undo no hatten : kankyou seigi no kanten[臺灣環境運動の発展:環境正義の観点. The Development of Taiwan's Environmental Movement : An Environmental Justice Perspective], Annals of Public Policy Studies, 7, 72-84. Forestry Agency, Conservation Division. (2004). Hoanrin oyobi Hoanshisetsu chikuseido no gaiyo[Overview of Protection Forest and Protection Facilities District System, 保安林及び保安施設地区制度の概要], p.88 Forestry Agency, Conservation Division. (2023). Hoanrin no shiteikaijo jimunado manyuaru(furyoku hen)[Manual for the Protection Forests Revocation(Wind Power), 保安林の指定解除事務などマニュアル(風力編)], Retrieved October20, 2023, from https://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/j/tisan/tisan/attach/pdf/h_portal-7.pdf Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute. (2003).「Shinrinkyuusyuuryouhoukoku・kensyoutaisei kinkyuuseibijigyou」nitsuite [Emergency Improvement Project for Forest Absorption Reporting and Verification System, 「森林吸収量報告・検証体制緊急整備事業」について], Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute bulletin[森林総合研究所 所報], No. 30. Forestry Agency,(2002), Hoanrinseibikeikaku(Henko)no gaiyo[Summary of Protection Forest Consolidation Plan(revised), 保安林整備計画(変更)の概要]. Retrieved November19, 2023, from https://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/puresu/h14-3gatu/hoanhenkou/s-02.htm Fujikake, I., & Ochi, S. (2022). Active Harvesting in the Non-national Headwater Conservation Forests: A Case Study of Miyazaki Prefecture. Forest Economy, 75(6), 1-16. Fujiwara, M. (1991). Resort Area Development in the Forests. Bulletin of the Utsunomiya University Forests, 27, 1-26. Fukao, S.(1991). Sengorinsei no tenkai to shinrinho[戦後林政の展開と森林法. Development of post-war forestry policy and the Forest Act]. Forest Economic Research Institute, 1991(120), 2-9. Furuido, H. (2018). Rinsei ni okeru hoanrinseido no igi[林政における保安林制度の意義. Significance of the Protection Forest System in Forestry Policy]. Forestry Economics, 70(12), 10-17. Furuido, H.(2018). Protective Forests and Its Legal Restriction on Land Conversion ── In Japanʼs Forest Act in 1907 ──, Keizaigaku ronsan The Journal of economics, 58(2), 147-168. Furuido, H., & Komaki, T. (2004).Hoanrin no gainen ni tsuite[保安林の概念について, On the Concept of Security Forest]. Database of Presentations at the 115th Annual Meeting of the Forestry Society of Japan. Goto, Y.(1992). Rizo-to ho to rizo-to kaihatsu ni tsuite[Regarding the Resort Law and Resort Development: Regarding the Development of Residents' Movements, リゾート法とリゾート開発について:住民運動の展開をめぐって], The Japanese Association of Sociology of Law, 1992(44), 218-222. Hagio, T. (1965). Cyosen・Mansyu・Taiwan ringyo hattatsushiron[朝鮮・満州・台湾林業発達史論. Theory of the development history of the forestry industry in Korea, Manchuria and Taiwan]. Japan, Tokyo: Ozorasha Shuppan[大空社出版] Hayashi, K. (2023). Reconsidering U. S. Aid to Taiwan : from a Historical Perspective, Seijo University economic papers, 239, 181-204. Hareyama,K.(1993). Rizo-to kaihatsu to shinrin no kiseikanwaーRizo-tokaihatsu wo meguru kiseikanwa no syomondai(3)ー[リゾート開発と森林の規制緩和一リゾート開発をめぐる規制緩和の諸問題(その3). Resort Development and Deregulation of ForestryーDeregulation of Resort Development and Forestry(3)ー]. Fukushima daigaku chiiki kenkyu[福島大学地域研究], 5(2), 19-28. Huang, Y. Q. (1995). Dai2jisekaitaisengo no Taiwan no Kinyu shisutemu to keizaihatten[ I第二次世界大戦後の台湾の金融システムと経済発展. Taiwan's Financial System and Economic Development after World War I]. The Ritsumeikan economic review : the quarterly journal of Ritsumeikan University, 44(1), 60-86. Ide,M.(2011). Looking back upon forest conservation(Chisan)measures of the last 100 years in Japan, Japan Society of Erosion Control Engineering, 64(1), 40-48. Igarashi, T. (2019). The "Retaking the Mainland" and Change of Military Strategy in the 1960s : The Situation in Mainland China and Strategic Judgment from the ROC's Perspective. International Politics[国際政治], 2019(197), 42-57. Igarashi, T. (2020), Syo keikoku no Gyouseiin tyoki ni okeru kokubou kensetu(1972-1978); 「kousyuittai」senryaku ni motoduku 「tairikuhankou」to「taiwanbouei」no taisei[蒋経国の行政院長期における国防建設(1972-1978); 「攻守一体」戦略にもとづく「大陸反攻」と「台湾防衛」の体制. Chiang Ching-kuo's National Defense Construction during the Executive Yuan (1972-1978); The "Mainland Counteroffensive" and "Taiwan Defense" System Based on the Strategy of "Offensive and Defense in One]. Asian Studies, 66(4), 1-19. Inoue, Y. (1994). A Study on the Utilization of Regional Forest Resources:Development of Forest Utilization by Farmers in the National Forest Region, RESEARCH BULLETIN OF THE HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY FORESTS, 51(2), 167-242. Ishida, H. (1997) Contributions of Private Small-Scale Enterprises to Taiwan Economy in the postwar period: "Developmental Dictatorship" and "Taiwan Experience", The economic review of Kansai University, 47(3-4), 361-397 Izumi, E. (2003). Konpan no 「Rinseikaikaku」to shinrinkumiai[今般の「林政改革」と森林組合. The recent 'forestry reform' and forestry cooperatives], Forest Economic Research Institute, 49(1), 23-34. Kakizawa, H. (2010). The need for a long-term strategy for Forestry Reform, Forest economy, 63(4), 34-35. Kanno, A. (2005). Sengotaiwan ni okeru bunkaseisaku no tenkanten wo megutte -syoukeikoku ni yoru「bunkakensetu」wo tyushin ni[戦後台湾における文化政策の転換点をめぐって-蒋経国による「文化建設」を中心に-. On the Turning Point of Cultural Policy in Postwar Taiwan: Focusing on Chiang Ching-kuo's "Cultural Construction], Asian studies, 51(3), 41-59. Kato, H., & Tachibana, S. (2022). Relation between Protection Forest System and Forestry Management: Focusing on the Private Headwater Conservation Forests in Hitachiota City, Ibaraki Prefecture. Journal of the Japanese Forest Society, 104(7), 363-373. Kawaguchi, T. (1989). Shinrin no suidohojikinou(Ⅱ)ーChuchihozen(kohaiboshi)kinouー[森林の水土保持機能(Ⅱ)-土保全(荒廃防止)機能-. Water and soil retention function of forests(Ⅱ)-Soil conservation(prevention of deradation)function-]. Water Science, 32(6), 24-31 Lee, C. C. (2014). Taiwan ni okeru minsyuka to kokkaikaikaku[台湾における民主化と国会改革. Democratization and Parliamentary Reform in Taiwan]. Doctoral dissertation, International Japanese Studies, University of Tsukuba Maeda, N. (1995). The US-Taiwan Friction during the First Taiwan Straits Crisis, 1954-1955. The Hiroshima Law Journal, 18(4), 149-180. Matsumoto, H. (1998). Taiwan kaikyo kiki(1954-1955) to beika sougo bouei joyaku no teiketsu[台湾海峡危機[一九五四-五五]と米華相互防衛条約の締結. The Taiwan Strait Crisis [1954-1955] and the U.S.-China Mutual Defense Treaty]. International Politics[国際政治], 118, 84-102. Mitsui, S. (1996). Hoanrinseido no kinou to kadai : shinrinsyoyuusya tyousakekka karakangaerukoto[保安林制度の機能と課題:森林所有者調査結果から考えること. Functions and Challenges of the Protection Forest System: Considerations from the Results of a Survey of Forest Owners]. Forest economy, 96(3), 7-11. Nakashima, K. (2021). Development and Conservation of Forest in the Japanese Empire: a Case of Taiwan. Journal of Forest Economics, 67 (1), 3-15. Osawa, M., & Koizumi, K. (2022). A Study on The Maintainance, Management, Conservation and Ownership of Forests, The bulletin of Yokohama City University Social Science, 73 (2・3), 1-22. Sato,Y.(2001). Keizai no hatten・suitai・saisei ni kansuru kenkyukai」hokokusyo dai10syo Taiwan[「経済の発展・衰退・再生に関する研究会」報告書 第10章 台湾. Report of "Study Group on Economic Development, Decline, and Revitalization." Chapter 10 Taiwan], 238-267, Retrieved September 27, 2022, from https://www.mof.go.jp/pri/research/conference/zk051/zk051k.pdf Takeyama, E., Wang, C. J., Kuki, H., Nakajima, M. (2019). Backgrounds and Present Situation of Agricultural Land Sprawl by Construction of Farmhouse in Taiwan― Comparative study of Taiwan and Japan ―. Transactions of the Japanese Society of Irrigation, Drainage and Rural Engineering, Irrigation, drainage and rural engineering journal, 67(1), II_47-II_57. Terao,O. (2015). Taiwan ni okeru taikihozenseisaku no keiseikatei -1975nen kuukiosenbouseiho wo wo tyushin ni-[ 台湾における大気保全政策の形成過程-1975 年空気汚染防制法を中心に-. The Formation Process of Air Pollution Control Policy in Taiwan: Focusing on the Air Pollution Control Act of 1975]. Institute of Developing Economies, Japan External Trade Organization, 60-74. Tsuchiya, M. (2003), Li toki seiken to taiwan no minsyuka katei[李登輝政権と台湾の民主化過程, The Lee Teng-hui Administration and Taiwan's Democratization Process]. Meiji Journal of Governance Studies Seisaku ronso[明治大学政治経済研究所 政經論叢], 71(5-6), 1-40 Tsutsui, M. (1974). Shinrinho no kiseki[森林法の軌跡. Trajectory of the Forest Act], Japan, Tokyo: No-rin syuppan[農林出版] Tsutsui, M. (2008). Hoanrinseido no kadai[保安林制度の課題. The problem of the protected forest system]. Water Science, 52(3), 57-71 Wakabayashi, M. (1999). Taiwanese Politics in the Post-democratization Period: Eight Years of Chen Shui-bian Administration, Japan, Tokyo: Kenkyu Sosho[研究双書] Zhang, X. H., Noguchi., T., Koike, M. (2009). Actual Condition and Problems of Protected Forest Management as Source of Water Suply in National Forest:a Case Study on Private Contract Enterprises in Nagano Prefecture. Journal of Forest Economics, 55(1), 99-108. English Romberg, A. D. (2004). Richard C. Bush, at Cross Purposes: U.S.-Taiwan Relations since 1942. Armonk. New York, M.E. Sharpe, 304. Weng, P. Y., Chaing, Y. C., Sato, N., Chang C. Y. (2013). An Investigation of the Transformed Forestry Sector in Japan and Taiwan. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Kyushu University, 58(2), 475-483. Zorn, T. (1999). A forest political study on protection forests of Germany, Austria and Japan. Journal of the Faculty of Agriculture, Hokkaido University, 69(2), 47-128. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94592 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 保安林是政府指定用來提供特定公共功能的森林,例如水源保護或防止土壤侵蝕。保安林制度於1897年隨著日本《森林法》的頒布而建立,並於1907年引入台灣。兩國在戰前的保安林制度有許多相似之處,然而,這些制度產生了相當大的變化。而現在,在伐木和其他活動的監管細節上有許多不同之處。
本研究旨在識別影響兩國保安林制度從二戰後至今演變的因素,並檢視其當前運作的差異。因此,這項研究主要關注保安林制度政策的變化、國有林中的保安林面積變化及其與社會經濟狀況的因果關係。文獻回顧主要使用政府文件和統計數據。基於現況運作的差異,本研究僅限於國有林,以釐清其由林業管理機構的管理,並進行了與林業管理機構的訪談和文獻回顧。 研究發現,作為林業及林業政策的一部分,保安林制度受社會經濟狀況的影響,在規範和面積上發生了變化。造成兩國當前差異的因素可能包括森林所有權類型、與侵蝕防護工程的關係以及國際關係。 此外,關於當前保安林的管理,台灣對林業作業的規範更嚴格,而對保安林解除的規範則比日本寬鬆。然而,這一制度可能是為了在比日本更強的土地使用壓力下,確保當地居民與保安林之間的和諧運作。因此,定期進行保安林調查,並需要第三方委員會的決定來審查保安林的解除。 本研究能對於亞洲地區的保安林,保護公共利益功能制度的國際比較研究領域,提供有用的資訊。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | Protection forests are forests that are designated by a government to provide a specific public function, such as conservation of water sources or prevention of soil erosion. The protection forest system, which was established in 1897 with the enactment of the Forest Act in Japan, was introduced in Taiwan in 1907. There were many similarities among the pre-war protection forest systems of both countries. However, these systems have undergone considerable changes, and currently, have several differences in the regulatory details of logging and other activities.
This study aimed to identify factors that influenced the evolution of protection forest systems in both countries from the post-World War II period to the present, and to examine differences in their current operations. Accordingly, this study focused mainly on changes in the policies of the protection forest system and the protection forest area in national forests, and the causal relationship with social and economic conditions. A literature review was conducted primarily using government documents and statistical data. Regarding the current operational differences, the research was limited to the national forests to clarify their management by forestry administration agencies. Accordingly, interviews with the forestry administration agencies and literature reviews were conducted. The study found that as part of forestry and forestry policies, protection forest systems have been influenced by socioeconomic conditions and have changed in regulation and area. Factors that may have caused the current differences between the two countries include the original forest ownership types, relationship with erosion control works, and international relations. In addition, regarding the current management of protection forests, Taiwan has more stringent regulations on forestry operations and laxer regulations for revocation of protection forests than Japan. However, this system is possibly operated to ensure the harmony between the local people and the protection forest under stronger land use pressure than that in Japan. Accordingly, periodic surveys of protection forests are conducted and a decision by a third-party committee is required to review the revocation of protection forests. This study will provide useful information in the field of international comparative research on systems for conservation of public interest functions of protection forests in the Asian region. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-16T16:55:34Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-16T16:55:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目 次
口試委員會審定書…………………………………………………. i 誌謝…………………………………………………………………. ii 中文摘要……………………………………………………………. iii 英文摘要…………………………………………………………… ⅳ 目次.................................................. vi 圖次............................................ viii 表次......................................... x Introduction............... 1 Chapter 1 The evolution of Protection Forest in Taiwan 11 Section 1 Overview of History of Protection Forests 11 Section 2 (1)Timber production period in post-war Recovery and Economic growth:1945-1970 19 Section 3(2)Change in direction of Forestry Policy 1(emphasis public benefit):1971-1986 30 Section 4(3)Change in direction of Forestry Policy 2(forest conservation):1986-2022 41 Chapter 2 The Evolution of Protection Forest in Japan 49 Section 1 Post-WW2 Amendment of Forest Act: 1945–1962 49 Section 2 Second to Fifth Protection Forest Consolidation Plan(1964-1993) 57 Section 3. Revision of the Fifth Protection Forest Consolidation Plan-Current 65 Chapter 3 The current of Protection Forest in Taiwan 74 Section 1 The current state of ownership, category and distribution 74 Section 2 The Protection Forest Revision 87 Section 3 The Protection Forest Revocation and its background 95 Section 4 Protection Forest Designation 108 Chapter 4 The Operation of Protection Forest in Japan 111 Section 1 The current state of ownership, category 111 Section 2 Management of Protection Forest 112 Section 3 Designation and Revocation of Protection Forest 118 Chapter 5 Comparison of Protection Forests by Categories & Summary 122 Section 1 Comparison of Protection Forests by Category 122 Section 2 Results Summary 134 Conclusion and Discussion 132 Section 1 Discussion 132 Section 2 Conclusion & Contribution 135 Section 3 Implication & Recommendation 136 Reference 138 圖 次 Fig. 1. Study diagram 6 Fig. 2. Protection Forest Rate of National Forest in Taiwan 9 Fig. 3. Protection Forest Rate of Public and Private Forest in Taiwan 9 Fig. 4. Protection Forest Rate of National Forest in Japan 10 Fig. 5. Protection Forest Rate of Public and Private Forest in Japan 10 Fig. 6. Change of Protection Forest Area(ha) in Taiwan (1923-2020) 17 Fig. 7. Change of Saw Timber an Fire wood Production(m³) in Taiwan 17 Fig. 8. Change of Import and Export of wood products(m3)in Taiwan(1946-2021) 18 Fig. 9. Structure of Domestic Production(1951-2021) 25 Fig. 10. The Change of Protection Forest Area(ha) and Wood Logging Area(ha) in Japan(1946-2021) 49 Fig. 11. Distribution Protection Forest in Taiwan 78 Fig. 12. Draftsand – Windbreak Tide Protection Forest Area by County and City(2022) 78 Fig. 13. Protection Forest Management Plan and other Forest Management Plan 85 Fig.14. Flow of Protection Forest Revision 90 Fig. 15. Photo of No. 1311 Protection Forest (inside red line) 93 Fig. 16. 2012-2021 Designation Protection Forest Area by Category of Protection Forest 109 Fig.17. Land Use Coordination Guidance Principle in the Overlapping Areas of the Five Area Division 113 Fig. 18. Structure of the Forest Planning System 115 Fig. 19. Procedure of Protection Forest Designation and Revocation 121 Fig. 20. Rate of Change in Area of Protection Forest for Headwater Conservation 125 Fig. 21. Rate of Change in Area of Protection Forest for Erosion Control 126 表 次 Table 1. Interview schedule and the Targets of the interviews 5 Table 2. Land Area, Popluation and Population density in Taiwan and Japan 8 Table 3. All Forest and Protection Forest Area and Ratio by Ownership Type 8 Table 4. Compare Protection Forest Regulation in 1945 between Taiwan and Japan110 Table 5. Chronology of Protection Forest in Taiwan 16 Table 6. Chronology of International and Taiwan Situation, Forestry Policy, and Protection Forest in Taiwan(1945-1970) 19 Table 7. Plan and Actual of Protection Forest Revision Survey 30 Table 8. The chronology of International and Taiwan Situation, Forestry Policy, and Protection Forest in Taiwan(1971-1986) 30 Table 9. The chronology of International and Taiwan Situation, Forestry Policy, and Protection Forest in Taiwan(1987-2022) 41 Table 10. The chronology of Social situation, Forestry Policy, National Forest and Protection Forest in Japan 49 Table 11. Protection Forest Consolidation Plan and Result 51 Table 12. Revision of Designation Plan Area in Protection Forest Consolidation Plan 67 Table 13. Revision of Designation Criteria in Protection Forest Consolidation Plan 68 Table 14. Revision of Designation Regulation of Cutting in Protection Forest Consolidation Plan 68 Table 15. Division of National Forest Working Circle in Taiwan Region Forest Area 75 Table 16. Ownership of All Forest and Protection Forest 75 Table 17. Protection Forest Area by Ownership and Inside/Outside National Forest W.C. (2022) 76 Table 18. Planting Method by Protection Forest Categories 81 Table 19. : Type of District with Logging Restrictions imposed and the Laws and the Legal Basis for such Restrictions.(Areas are for terrestrial areas only. Overlapping areas are not subtracted.) 84 Table 20. Types and Means of Management of Protection Forest 86 Table 21. Process of Protection Forest Revision in Forest District 90 Table 22. The Table Contents of “Result Report of the Protection Forest Revision 91 Table 23. History of previous designation and revocation of Protection Forest1 1311 93 Table 24. Key Points and Assessment Principles of Revocation Protection Forest Inspection Consolidation Plan 98 Table 25. Two types of revocation of Protection Forest 102 Table26. The area of revoked protection forests from 2012 or 2022 is listed by the reason for revocation(by item in Article 2 of the ”Revocation Standard for Protection Forest”)Consolidation Plan 102 Table.27. Statistical Tables on the Illegal Occupation and Land Use of O/W Protection Forest Area 106 Table 28. Categorized Area of Illegal Cultivated Land in O/W Protection Forest 106 Table 29. Changes in Criteria for Revocation Protection Forest 107 Table 30. Designation Protection Forest Area by year(2012-2021) 109 Table 31. Protection Forest Area by Category and Ownership 111 Table 32. Explanation of sign in Fig.17 113 Table 33. Five Types of National Forests Designation 115 Table 34. Cutting Regulation of “Requirements for Designation” 117 Table 35. The Area of Protection Forests by Final Cutting Method as Specified in the Actual Requirements for Designation 118 Table 36. Conditions for Revocation of Protection Forest for Conversion 121 Table 37. Correspondence Table of Protection Forest Categories in Taiwan and Japan 122 Table 38. Area and ratio of protection forests for all categories, headwater conservation, and erosion control 124 Table 39. Area of Protection Forests and Rate of Change from 1950-2020 125 Table 40. Designation and Revocation Area from 2018 to 2019 130 Table 41. Revocation Procedure of Protection Forests in Taiwan and Japan 130 Table 42. Requirements for Revocation of Protection Forests in Taiwan and Japan 131 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 臺灣與日本保安林制度比較研究:法律沿革與現行制度運作 | zh_TW |
dc.title | The Comparative Study of Protection Forest System in Taiwan and Japan: Legal Evolution and Current Operation of the System | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 立花敏 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Satoshi Tachibana | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 黃裕星;陳財輝 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yue-Hsing Huang;Tsai-Huei Chen | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 林業政策,國際比較,戰後,林地轉用,訪談調查, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Forestry policy,international comparison,post-war,conversion of forest,interview survey, | en |
dc.relation.page | 150 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401356 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-08 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 森林環境暨資源學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 森林環境暨資源學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf | 3.78 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。