請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94222完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 林子倫 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Tze-Luen Lin | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 呂祐萱 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hsuan Lu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-15T16:18:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-16 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-15 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-07 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、 中文部分
MyWay都市基礎工程組(2018)，〈都市人本交通道路規劃設計手冊(第二版)〉，內政部國土管理署網頁：https://myway.cpami.gov.tw/wiki/wikiSession/240。 交通部統計處(2021)，〈機車使用情況調查報告〉，中華民國行政院交通部網頁：https://www.motc.gov.tw/uploaddowndoc?file=survey/201911011142510.pdf&filedisplay=201911011142510.pdf&flag=doc。 行政院(2023)，〈出席「TPASS行政院通勤月票啟動記者會」 陳揆：中央主導、地方參與 共推省錢方便有感政策〉，網址：https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/4b31602c-75ed-4d58-b677-6e26cae86e97。 宋威穎、吳濟華、曹瀚文、洪嘉聰(2017)。高雄市交通型態轉型發展生態交通的困難與挑戰，中國地方自治，70(7)：3-17。 宋威穎、曹瀚文、侯彥廷(2019)。高雄辦理生態交通全球盛典對哈瑪星社區衝擊與影響—政策利害關係人角度分析，中國地方自治，72(1)：3-27。 李翠萍(2016)。環境程序正義 在褐地重建中的實踐條件：我國汙染土地再利用實力的觀察分析，政治科學論叢，68：37-76。 周桂田(2014)。風險社會典範轉移 打造為公眾負責的治理模式。遠流出版事業股份有限公司：臺北。 周桂田、曾玟學(2017)。氣候變遷與耗水產業雙人舞：水資源治理之路徑依賴分析，思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，55(1)：1-63。 林子倫(2021)。淨零排放的氣候政策意涵、趨勢及論述爭辯，國際開發援助現場季刊，6：6-20。 林子倫、李宜卿(2017)。歐盟能源政策之社會溝通與公眾參與：參與式治理的觀點。臺灣能源期刊，4(1)：1-16。 林子倫、李宜卿、周素卿(2021)。淨零轉型的知識與行動架構：臺灣知識社群研究圖像的檢視，臺灣能源期刊，8：297-316。 邱秉瑜、廖卿惠、歐習墨(2018)。綠色行動-體驗生態交通活動(中譯本)。Jovis Verlag GmbH: Berlin. 凃春杏(2017)。誰在乎生態交通？影響哈瑪星居民生態交通行為意向之因素〔未出版之碩士論文〕。國立中山大學公共事務管理研究所。 洪明龍(2022年11月22日)。日本能源政策評析報告。工業技術研究院。 高雄市政府交通局(2017)。2017高雄生態交通全球盛典──哈瑪星生態交通示範計畫，城市發展半年刊，20：26-46。 高雄市政府交通局(2018a)。2017 生態交通全球盛典在高雄，網址：https://www.tbkc.gov.tw/upload/WebList/295/456d79c5-eaac-472d-abc7-2adf415ded73/AllFiles/%E7%94%9F%E6%85%8B%E4%BA%A4%E9%80%9A%E5%85%A8%E7%90%83%E7%9B%9B%E5%85%B8.pdf。 高雄市政府交通局(2018b)。用綠發動哈瑪星。普生數位科技有限公司：高雄。 高雄市政府交通局(2018c)。高雄行綠交通。高雄市交通局成果專書。 高雄市政府交通局(2023)，〈高雄市區通勤月票399元方案 4月27日上線、4月18日先開放申請會員及綁卡〉，網址：https://www.tbkc.gov.tw/Message/Bulletin/News?ID=ce0aa2d7-5151-48f3-a866-1ea9b7684a7b。 國家發展委員會(2022)，〈臺灣2050淨零排放路徑〉，中華民國國家發展委員會網頁：https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=FD76ECBAE77D9811&upn=5CE3D7B70507FB38。 國家發展委員會(2023)，〈臺灣2050淨零轉型「公正轉型」關鍵戰略行動計畫(核定本)〉，中華民國行政院全球資訊網：https://www.ey.gov.tw/File/6420FF2E920DBAE4?A=C。 張國暉(2019)。從政府治理到轉型研究及風險治理，思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，57(3)：233-285。 張國暉(2023)。轉型管理的興起、定位及新治理構思：自成一家的演變及挑戰，公共行政學報，64：79-116。 曹美慧、余志達、范芷瑄、陳昱亨、劉怡君、林聖錞、王俊傑、陳慧真、林尚廷、曾佩如、朱珮芸、李佳玲、楊智凱、陳冠旭(2021)。運輸部門溫室氣體減量 第二階段策略精進研究(初版)。交通部運輸研究所。 許致銓(2020)。哈瑪星地景空間變遷之歷史社會分析，網址：https://pid.depositar.io/ark:37281/k5r805385。 新北市政府環保局(2021)。零碳翻轉 新北先行 侯友宜提2050淨零碳。小菉月刊。https://www.epd.ntpc.gov.tw/Journal/Content?c=11005&t=policy 經濟部能源局(2022)，〈110年度 我國燃料燃燒二氧化碳排統計與分析〉，中華民國行政院經濟部網頁：https://www.moeaboe.gov.tw/ecw/populace/content/ContentDesc.aspx?menu_id=21909。 鄭婷宇、林子倫(2018)。鍵盤參與：從「零時政府」檢視黑客社群協作式的公民參與，傳播與社會學刊，46：15-51。 貳、 西文部分 Argyriou, I., & Barry, J. (2021). The political economy of socio-technical transitions: A relational view of the state and bus system decarbonization in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 79, 102174. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102174 Armitage, D., De Loë, R., & Plummer, R. (2012). Environmental governance and its implications for conservation practice. Conservation Letters, 5(4), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263x.2012.00238.x Atteridge, A., & Weitz, N. (2017). A political economy perspective on technology innovation in the Kenyan clean cookstove sector. Energy Policy, 110, 303-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.08.029 Bergek, A., Hekkert, M., Jacobsson, S., Markard, J., Sandén, B., & Truffer, B. (2015). Technological innovation systems in contexts: Conceptualizing contextual structures and interaction dynamics. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 16, 51-64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2015.07.003 Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2004). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In B. Elzen, Geels, F.W., Green, K. (Ed.), System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability: Theory, Evidence and Policy. (pp. 48–75). Edward Elgar,Cheltenham. Cahill, B., & Allen, M. M. (2020). Just transition concepts and relevance for climate action: a preliminary framework. C. f. S. a. I. Studies. Carlsson, B., & Stankiewicz, R. (1991). On the nature, function and composition of technological systems. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1(2), 93-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01224915 Carroli, L. (2018). Planning roles in infrastructure system transitions: A review of research bridging socio-technical transitions and planning. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 81-89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.06.001 Conti, D. D., Guevara, A. J. D., Heinrichs, H., da Silva, L. F., Quaresma, C. C., & Bete, T. D. (2019). Collaborative governance towards cities sustainability transition. Urbe-Revista Brasileira De Gestao Urbana, 11, Article UNSP e20190046. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.011.e20190046 Edmondson, D. L., Kern, F., & Rogge, K. S. (2019). The co-evolution of policy mixes and socio-technical systems: Towards a conceptual framework of policy mix feedback in sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 48(10), 103555. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.03.010 Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8), 1257-1274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Geels, F. W. (2011). The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 24-40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002 Geels, F. W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471-482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021 Geels, F. W., Elzen, B., & Green, K. (2004). General Introduction: System Innovation and Transitions to Sustainability. System Innovation and the Transition to Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423421.00010 Genus, A., & Coles, A.-M. (2008). Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy, 37(9), 1436-1445. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006 Grin, J. (2010). Transitions to Sustainable Development (1st Edition ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203856598 Healy, N., & Barry, J. (2017). Politicizing energy justice and energy system transitions: Fossil fuel divestment and a “just transition”. Energy Policy, 108, 451-459. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.06.014 Heffron, R., & McCauley, D. (2018). What is the 'Just Transition'? Geoforum, 88, 74-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2017.11.016 Hickman, R., Ashiru, O., & Banister, D. (2011). Transitions to low carbon transport futures: strategic conversations from London and Delhi. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(6), 1553-1562. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.03.013 Hofstad, H., Vedeld, T., Agger, A., Hanssen, G. S., Tønnesen, A., & Valencia, S. (2022). Cities as public agents: A typology of co-creational leadership for urban climate transformation. Earth System Governance, 13, 100146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2022.100146 Hoppe, T., Graf, A., Warbroek, B., Lammers, I., & Lepping, I. (2015). Local Governments Supporting Local Energy Initiatives: Lessons from the Best Practices of Saerbeck (Germany) and Lochem (The Netherlands). Sustainability, 7(2), 1900-1931. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021900 IEA. (2021). Empowering Cities for a Net Zero Future. IEA. https://www.iea.org/reports/empowering-cities-for-a-net-zero-future Jain, M., Hoppe, T., & Bressers, H. (2017). A Governance Perspective on Net Zero Energy Building Niche Development in India: The Case of New Delhi. Energies, 10(8), 1144. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/8/1144 Javaid, A., Creutzig, F., & Bamberg, S. (2020). Determinants of low-carbon transport mode adoption: systematic review of reviews. Environmental Research Letters, 15(10), 103002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aba032 Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., . . . Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004 Kemp, R. (2010). The Dutch energy transition approach. International Economics and Economic Policy, 7(2-3), 291-316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-010-0163-y Kemp, R., & Rotmans, J. (2005). The Management of the Co-Evolution of Technical, Environmental and Social Systems. In M. Weber & J. Hemmelskamp (Eds.), Towards Environmental Innovation Systems (pp. 33-55). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27298-4_3 Kenis, A., Bono, F., & Mathijs, E. (2016). Unravelling the (post-)political in Transition Management: Interrogating Pathways towards Sustainable Change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 568-584. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1141672 Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2010). Risk Governance: Contemporary and Future Challenges. In J. Eriksson, M. Gilek, & C. Rudén (Eds.), Regulating Chemical Risks: European and Global Challenges (pp. 9-27). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9428-5_2 Kotilainen, K., Aalto, P., Valta, J., Rautiainen, A., Kojo, M., & Sovacool, B. K. (2019). From path dependence to policy mixes for Nordic electric mobility: Lessons for accelerating future transport transitions. Policy Sciences, 52(4), 573-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-019-09361-3 Levi, M. (1997). A model, a method, and a map: Rational choice in comparative and historical analysis. In I. M. I. Lichbach & A. S. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure. Cambridge University Press. Linton, S., Clarke, A., & Tozer, L. (2021). Strategies and Governance for Implementing Deep Decarbonization Plans at the Local Level. Sustainability, 13(1), 154. https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/1/154 Lo, K., Li, H., & Chen, K. (2020). Climate experimentation and the limits of top-down control: local variation of climate pilots in China. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 63(1), 109-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2019.1619539 Loorbach, D., & Rotmans, J. (2006). Managing Transitions for Sustainable Development. In X. Olsthoorn & A. J. Wieczorek (Eds.), Understanding Industrial Transformation: Views from Different Disciplines (pp. 187-206). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4418-6_10 Loorbach, D., Wittmayer, J. M., Shiroyama, H., Fujino, J., & Mizuguchi, S. (2016). Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions. Springer Tokyo. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4 Malekpour, S., Walker, W. E., de Haan, F. J., Frantzeskaki, N., & Marchau, V. A. W. J. (2020). Bridging Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty (DMDU) and Transition Management (TM) to improve strategic planning for sustainable development. Environmental Science & Policy, 107, 158-167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.03.002 Malerba, F. (2002). Sectoral systems of innovation and production. Research Policy, 31(2), 247-264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00139-1 Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955-967. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Marsden, G., Jillian, A., Chatterton, T., Docherty, I., Faulconbridge, J., Murray, L., Roby, H., & Shires, J. (2020). Studying disruptive events: Innovations in behaviour, opportunities for lower carbon transport policy? Transport Policy, 94, 89-101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2020.04.008 Marsden, G., Mullen, C., Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2014). Carbon reduction and travel behaviour: Discourses, disputes and contradictions in governance. Transport Policy, 35, 71-78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.05.012 Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.008 McCauley, D., & Heffron, R. (2018). Just transition: Integrating climate, energy and environmental justice. Energy Policy, 119, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.04.014 McLaren Loring, J. (2007). Wind energy planning in England, Wales and Denmark: Factors influencing project success. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2648-2660. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.10.008 Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z Meadowcroft, J., & Rosenbloom, D. (2023). Governing the net-zero transition: Strategy, policy, and politics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 120(47), e2207727120. https://doi.org/doi:10.1073/pnas.2207727120 Nakamura, K., & Hayashi, Y. (2013). Strategies and instruments for low-carbon urban transport: An international review on trends and effects. Transport Policy, 29, 264-274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.07.003 Negro, S. O., & Hekkert, M. P. (2008). Explaining the success of emerging technologies by innovation system functioning: the case of biomass digestion in Germany. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(4), 465-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802141437 Ortt, J. R., & Kamp, L. M. (2022). A technological innovation system framework to formulate niche introduction strategies for companies prior to large-scale diffusion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 180, 121671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121671 Patterson, J. J. (2021). Remaking political institutions in sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 64-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2021.10.011 Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2021). A perspective on the human dimensions of a transition to net-zero energy systems. Energy and Climate Change, 2, 100042. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100042 Pickering, J., Hickmann, T., Bäckstrand, K., Kalfagianni, A., Bloomfield, M., Mert, A., Ransan-Cooper, H., & Lo, A. Y. (2022). Democratising sustainability transformations: Assessing the transformative potential of democratic practices in environmental governance. Earth System Governance, 11, 100131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2021.100131 Poelzer, G., & Yu, S. (2021). All trust is local: Sustainable development, trust in government and legitimacy in northern mining projects. Resources Policy, 70, 101888. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2020.101888 Prandecki, K. (2014). Theoretical Aspects of Sustainable Energy. Energy and Environmental Engineering, 2(4), 83-90. https://doi.org/10.13189/eee.2014.020401 Rauschmayer, F., Bauler, T., & Schäpke, N. (2013). Towards a governance of sustainability transitions: Giving place to individuals. In. Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS): Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (UFZ), Division of Social Sciences (ÖKUS). Ribeiro, T., Lima, A., & Vasconcelos, C. (2021). The need for transparent communication in mining: a case study in lithium exploitation. International Journal of Science Education, Part B, 11(4), 324-343. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2021.1999530 Rienstra, S. A., & Nijhamp, P. (1999). FROM THE EXPECTED TO THE DESIRED FUTURE OF PASSENGER TRANSPORT: A Stakeholder Approach. In D. R.-. Desjardins, C. Spash, & J. V. Straaten (Eds.), Environmental Policy and Societal Aims (Vol. 2, pp. 279-305). Kluwer Academic Publishers. Rietveld, P., & Stough, R. (2006). Institutions, regulations and sustainable transport, a review. European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research, 6(1), 99-112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18757/ejtir.2006.6.1.4325 Rifkin, J. (2020). The green New Deal: why the fossil fuel civilization will collapse by 2028, and the bold economic plan to save life on Earth. New York: St. Martin's Griffin. Roorda, C., Wittmayer, J., Henneman, P., Steenbergen, F. v., Frantzeskaki, N., & Loorbach, D. (2014). Transition Management In The Urban Context: Guidance Manual. DRIFT, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam. Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110803003 Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2009). Complexity and Transition Management. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 13(2), 184-196. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00116.x Schlosberg, D. (2004). Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics, 13(3), 517-540. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000229025 Seeliger, L., & Turok, I. (2013). Towards Sustainable Cities: Extending Resilience with Insights from Vulnerability and Transition Theory. Sustainability, 5(5), 2108-2128. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5052108 Seto, K. C., Churkina, G., Hsu, A., Keller, M., Newman, P. W. G., Qin, B., & Ramaswami, A. (2021). From Low- to Net-Zero Carbon Cities: The Next Global Agenda. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 46(1), 377-415. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-050120-113117 Seto, K. C., Davis, S. J., Mitchell, R. B., Stokes, E. C., Unruh, G., & Ürge-Vorsatz, D. (2016). Carbon Lock-In: Types, Causes, and Policy Implications. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 425-452. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085934 Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2007). Caution! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 39(4), 763-770. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39310 Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39(4), 471-476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019 Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491-1510. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435-448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023 Steimer, H., Kothari, V., & Cassius, S. (2022). Zero-Emission Delivery Zones: Decarbonizing Urban Freight and Goods Delivery in U.S. Cities. W. R. Institution. Sugar, K., & Webb, J. (2022). Value for Money: Local Authority Action on Clean Energy for Net Zero. Energies, 15(12), 4359. https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/12/4359 Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (2006). Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781847200266 Walker, G. (2011). Environmental Justice: Concepts, evidence and politics (1st Edition ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203610671 Wamsler, C., Mundaca, L., & Osberg, G. (2022). Rethinking political agency: The role of individuals’ engagement, perceptions and trust in transitioning to a low-carbon transport system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 360, 132197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132197 Wang, S., Wang, J., & Yang, F. (2020). From willingness to action: Do push-pull-mooring factors matter for shifting to green transportation? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102242. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102242 Whitmarsh, L. (2012). How useful is the Multi-Level Perspective for transport and sustainability research? Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 483-487. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.022 Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Insights and Lessons for the Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions. In D. Loorbach, J. M. Wittmayer, H. Shiroyama, J. Fujino, & S. Mizuguchi (Eds.), Governance of Urban Sustainability Transitions: European and Asian Experiences (pp. 153-169). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-55426-4 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/94222 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 氣候變遷已經為世界各地帶來莫大的負面衝擊，聯合國通過《巴黎氣候協定》致力於將地球升溫幅度控制在工業化前平均水準的攝氏1.5度內，為了達到控制升溫幅度之目標，各國政府紛紛提出國家自主貢獻(Nationally Determined Contributions, NDCs)以及淨零排放的轉型計畫。我國政府亦響應國際趨勢於2022年3月30日提出「臺灣2050淨零排放路徑」，其中運輸部門轉型以運具電動化、人本綠運輸以及私人汽機車管理為主要策略，並以加強都市規劃、綠色運輸生活型態為輔助策略。若要達成運輸部門轉型，除了發展低碳技術外，必須從根本降低大眾對於私人運具的需求。換言之，這種改變還涉及到社會面向與生活型態的轉變。
2017年國際組織ICLEI與高雄市共同舉辦的「生態交通全球盛典」是我國極少數針對交通與外出習慣所進行的活動個案。儘管最後活動並沒有成功讓當地居民轉變成使用符合生態交通的移動模式，但仍相當具有研究價值，故本研究採用社會技術轉型的觀點，綜合過去理論的重要論點，重新梳理出一項能夠促進運輸部門淨零轉型的分析框架，從基礎建設與環境、社會溝通以及政府治理三個面向，探討在我國面對運輸部門轉型時，現階段面臨哪些困境、政府單位如何處理相關的阻礙，同時也透過此個案進一步去探討我國發展運輸淨零先行區的潛力與挑戰。 研究發現若要刺激民眾改採用低碳的交通模式，首要必須先改善現階段不連貫的交通基礎建設與移動環境，因為它會帶來制度的行為鎖定效果，加重對於私人運具的依賴程度以及降低對大眾運輸、主動運輸的接受度，鞏固既有的交通政體。第二，淨零與永續知識的建立需要依據不同的族群特性，運用不同的社會溝通途徑才能夠提高達成社會共識的可能。此外，轉型政策的推動也必須符合公正轉型的核心精神，若無及早提供民眾參與決策的管道，將降低民眾對政府的信任感，而使得民眾捍衛原有的制度、抵抗並延遲改變的發生。當政府在面對轉型課題時，須關注不同利害關係人的網絡互動方式，平衡不同立場的聲量，並找到當地社區的關鍵資源分配者進行協商與合作，更能推進轉型的發生。 本研究主要貢獻為建立運輸部門淨零轉型的分析框架，並用於探討我國運輸部門低碳轉型之個案，同時也補足過往理論所遺漏的公民參與和政府治理的角度，強調公民的影響力以及在轉型中政府應特別著重的面向，從中找出作為我國運輸部門淨零轉型的政策意涵。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Climate change has brought significant negative impacts worldwide. In response, the United Nations adopted the Paris Agreement, aiming to limit global warming to within 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels. To achieve this target, governments have proposed Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) and Net zero emission transition plans. In alignment with international trends, Taiwan government introduced the "Taiwan 2050 Net Zero Emissions Roadmap" on March 30, 2022. The transition of the transportation sector focuses on electric vehicles, promoting human-orientational green transportation, and managing private vehicles, complemented by enhanced urban planning and green transport lifestyles. Achieving this transition requires not only the development of low-carbon technologies but also reducing public dependence on private vehicles. This kind of transition entails a shift in social aspects and lifestyles.
The "Eco-Mobility World Festival," co-organized by ICLEI and Kaohsiung City in 2017, is one of the few cases in Taiwan focused on transportation and commuting habits. Although the event didn’t ultimately succeed in transforming local residents' mobility patterns to align with eco-friendly transportation, it remains highly valuable for research. Therefore, this study adopts the perspective of socio-technical transitions, integrating key theoretical insights from previous literature to develop an analytical framework that can promote net-zero transition in the transportation sector. The framework examines three dimensions: infrastructure and environment, social communication, and government governance. It explores the current challenges faced by Taiwan in its transportation sector transition, how government agencies address related obstacles, and investigate the potential and challenges of developing net-zero transportation pilot zones in Taiwan through this case study. First of all, the research finds that a successful transition to a low-carbon transportation model requires improving the currently fragmented transportation infrastructure and mobility environment. This is crucial as it can lead to behavioral lock-in effects, increasing dependence on private vehicles and decreasing acceptance of public and active transportation, thereby reinforcing the existing transportation regime. Second, building net-zero and sustainability knowledge requires different social communication approaches tailored to the characteristics of different groups to increase the likelihood of achieving social consensus. Additionally, promoting transition policies must align with the core spirit of the just transition. Failure to provide early public participation method in decision-making section will diminish public trust, leading to resistance and postpone in change as people will defend the existing system.When addressing transition issues, the government must be aware of the interaction between different stakeholder networks, balance the voices of different standpoints, and engage with key resource allocators in local communities for negotiation and cooperation, which can further facilitate the transition. The main contribution of this research is developing an analytical framework for the net-zero transition in the transportation sector. The framework is applied to a case study of the low-carbon transition in Taiwan's transportation sector. Additionally, it addresses the previously overlooked perspectives of citizen participation and government governance, emphasizing the influence of citizens on transition policies and highlighting the aspects that the government should particularly focus on. From this, the study identifies policy implications for the net-zero transition of Taiwan's transportation sector. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-15T16:18:10Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-15T16:18:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 ii
摘要 iii Abstract v 目次 vii 圖次 viii 表次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 5 第三節 研究方法與設計 7 第二章 社會技術轉型理論的評述 13 第一節 技術創新系統(Technological innovation systems) 15 第二節 多層次觀點(Multiple Levels Prospective) 17 第三節 轉型管理(Transition Management) 20 第四節 小結 24 第三章 架構的提出：促進運輸部門社會技術轉型的條件 28 第一節 社會基礎設施與環境 28 第二節 社會溝通與公民參與 31 第三節 政府治理 36 第四節 小結 41 第四章 生態交通全球盛典(Eco-Mobility World Festival)發展沿革 43 第一節 生態交通全球盛典的緣起 43 第二節 生態交通全球盛典在哈瑪星社區 46 第五章 生態交通全球盛典策略與成果之分析 60 第一節 基礎建設與環境的現況與改善 60 第二節 社會溝通提高民眾接受度 70 第三節 處理制度與政治的政府治理 80 第四節 生態交通全球盛典舉辦成效與後續影響 90 第六章 結論 95 第一節 研究發現 95 第二節 交通淨零先行區之未來發展政策建議 103 第三節 研究限制 106 參考文獻 107 壹、 中文部分 107 貳、 西文部分 110 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 從「生態交通全球盛典」探討我國運輸部門淨零轉型之潛力與挑戰：一個社會技術轉型的觀點 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Exploring the Potential and Challenges of Taiwan's Transportation Sector to Net Zero Transition from the “Eco-Mobility World Festival”: A Socio-Technical Transition Perspective | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 彭渰雯;鄭祖睿;陳惠萍 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yen-wen Peng;Tsu-Jui Cheng;Hui-Ping Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 社會技術轉型,淨零轉型,生態交通,淨零先行區,機車政體, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Socio-technical transition,net zero transition,eco-mobility,net zero pilot area,motorcycle regime, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 117 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202403073 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-10 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共事務研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 4.01 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。