請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93949
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 童慶斌 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ching-Pin Tung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 王于珊 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Yu-Shan Wang | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-09T16:37:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-08-10 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-09 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-05 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Abdelaal, F., & Guo, B. H. (2022). Stakeholders’ perspectives on BIM and LCA for green buildings. Journal of Building Engineering, 48, 103931.
Achenbach, H., Wenker, J. L., & Rüter, S. (2018). Life cycle assessment of product-and construction stage of prefabricated timber houses: a sector representative approach for Germany according to EN 15804, EN 15978 and EN 16485. European journal of wood and wood products, 76(2), 711-729. Adler, P., Allen, J., Lessar, J., & Francis, R. (2007). Martensite transformations and fatigue behavior of nitinol. Journal of ASTM International, 4(7), 1-16. Ahbe, S. (1990). Methodik fur Oekobilanzen auf der Basis okologischer Optimierung. Schriftenreihe Umwelt, Bundesamt fur Umwelt, Wald und Landschaft (BUWAL), 133. Ahmed Ali, K., Ahmad, M. I., & Yusup, Y. (2020). Issues, impacts, and mitigations of carbon dioxide emissions in the building sector. Sustainability, 12(18), 7427. Akomea-Frimpong, I., Kukah, A. S., Jin, X., Osei-Kyei, R., & Pariafsai, F. (2022). Green finance for green buildings: a systematic review and conceptual foundation. Journal of cleaner production, 356, 131869. Amiri, A., Emami, N., Ottelin, J., Sorvari, J., Marteinsson, B., Heinonen, J., & Junnila, S. (2021). Embodied emissions of buildings-A forgotten factor in green building certificates. Energy and Buildings, 241, 110962. Andersen, S. C., Larsen, H., Raffnsøe, L., & Melvang, C. (2019). Environmental product declarations (EPDs) as a competitive parameter within sustainable buildings and building materials. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, Barbhuiya, S., & Das, B. B. (2023). Life Cycle Assessment of construction materials: Methodologies, applications and future directions for sustainable decision-making. Case Studies in Construction Materials, e02326. Beemsterboer, S., Baumann, H., & Wallbaum, H. (2020). Ways to get work done: a review and systematisation of simplification practices in the LCA literature. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 25, 2154-2168. Berardi, U. (2012). Sustainability assessment in the construction sector: rating systems and rated buildings. Sustainable development, 20(6), 411-424. Bjørn, A., Owsianiak, M., Molin, C., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2018). LCA history. Life cycle assessment: theory and practice, 17-30. Blengini, G. A. (2009). Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy. Building and Environment, 44(2), 319-330. Carrizosa, R., & Ghosh, A. A. (2022). Sustainability-linked loan contracting. Available at SSRN 4103883. Compact, U. G. (2004). Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world. New York. Corbett, C. J., & Kirsch, D. A. (2001). International diffusion of ISO 14000 certification. Production and operations management, 10(3), 327-342. De Wolf, C., Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Measuring embodied carbon dioxide equivalent of buildings: A review and critique of current industry practice. Energy and Buildings, 140, 68-80. Debrah, C., Chan, A. P. C., & Darko, A. (2022). Green finance gap in green buildings: A scoping review and future research needs. Building and Environment, 207, 108443. Demeter, C., Lin, P.-C., Sun, Y.-Y., & Dolnicar, S. (2021). Assessing the carbon footprint of tourism businesses using environmentally extended input-output analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 30(1), 128-144. Ding, G. (2018). Embodied carbon in construction, maintenance and demolition in buildings. Embodied Carbon in Buildings: Measurement, Management, and Mitigation, 217-245. Durão, V., Silvestre, J. D., Mateus, R., & de Brito, J. (2020). Assessment and communication of the environmental performance of construction products in Europe: Comparison between PEF and EN 15804 compliant EPD schemes. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 156, 104703. East, A. J. (2008). What is a carbon footprint? An overview of definitions and methodologies. Vegetable industry carbon footprint scoping study—Discussion papers and workshop, 26 September 2008, Eccles, R. G., & Serafeim, G. (2013). The performance frontier. Harvard business review, 91(5), 50-60. Eggleston, H., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., & Tanabe, K. (2006). 2006 IPCC guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. Feng, Z., & Wu, Z. (2023). ESG disclosure, REIT debt financing and firm value. The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 67(3), 388-422. Finkbeiner, M., Inaba, A., Tan, R., Christiansen, K., & Klüppel, H.-J. (2006). The new international standards for life cycle assessment: ISO 14040 and ISO 14044. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11, 80-85. Finkbeiner, M., Schau, E. M., Lehmann, A., & Traverso, M. (2010). Towards life cycle sustainability assessment. Sustainability, 2(10), 3309-3322. Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M. Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., & Suh, S. (2009). Recent developments in life cycle assessment. Journal of environmental management, 91(1), 1-21. Georgakellos, D. A. (2015). LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS ASA MANAGEMENT TOOL IN ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS. An Integrated Approach to Environmental Management, 441. Guinee, J. B., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Zamagni, A., Masoni, P., Buonamici, R., Ekvall, T., & Rydberg, T. (2011). Life cycle assessment: past, present, and future. In: ACS Publications. Hamilton, I., Rapf, O., Kockat, D. J., Zuhaib, D. S., Abergel, T., Oppermann, M., Otto, M., Loran, S., Fagotto, I., & Steurer, N. (2020). Global status report for buildings and construction. United Nations Environmental Programme: Nairobi, Kenya. Hauschild, M. Z., & Huijbregts, M. A. (2015). Introducing life cycle impact assessment. Springer. Heijungs, R., Guinée, J. B., Huppes, G., Lankreijer, R. M., Udo de Haes, H., Wegener Sleeswijk, A., Ansems, A., Eggels, P., Duin, R. v., & De Goede, H. (1992). Environmental life cycle assessment of products: guide and backgrounds (Part 2). Hellweg, S., & Milà i Canals, L. (2014). Emerging approaches, challenges and opportunities in life cycle assessment. Science, 344(6188), 1109-1113. Hemphill, T. A. (2005). The United Nations Global Compact: the business implementation and accountability challenge. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics, 1(4), 303-316. Heras‐Saizarbitoria, I., Arana Landín, G., & Molina‐Azorín, J. F. (2011). Do drivers matter for the benefits of ISO 14001? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(2), 192-216. Hetherington, A. C., Borrion, A. L., Griffiths, O. G., & McManus, M. C. (2014). Use of LCA as a development tool within early research: challenges and issues across different sectors. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 19, 130-143. Horne, R. E. (2009). Life cycle assessment: origins, principles and context. Life cycle assessment: principles, practice and prospects, 1. Hwang, R.-l., & Hsu, H.-y. (2011). Comparision of the evaluation method for building energy consumption in Taiwan-EEWH with USGBC-LEED Green Building Rating System. 2011 International Conference on Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet), ISO, T. (2011). ISO/TS 21929-1: 2011, sustainability in building construction—Sustainability indicators—Part 1: Framework for the development of indicators for buildings (2011 ed., pp. 1–24). Geneva: ISO. ISO. (2015). ISO 14001: Environmental Management Systems-Requirements with Guidance for Use. ISO. Ivanica, R., Risse, M., Weber-Blaschke, G., & Richter, K. (2022). Development of a life cycle inventory database and life cycle impact assessment of the building demolition stage: A case study in Germany. Journal of cleaner production, 338, 130631. Kempeneer, S., Peeters, M., & Compernolle, T. (2021). Bringing the user Back in the building: an analysis of ESG in real estate and a behavioral framework to guide future research. Sustainability, 13(6), 3239. Kibert, C. J. (2004). Green buildings: an overview of progress. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law, 19(2), 491-502. Kibert, C. J. (2016). Sustainable construction: green building design and delivery. John Wiley & Sons. Klöpffer, W. (2006). The role of SETAC in the development of LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11, 116-122. Korkmaz, S., Erten, D., Syal, M., & Potbhare, V. (2009). A review of green building movement timelines in developed and developing countries to build an international adoption framework. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Construction in the 21st Century: Collaboration and Integration in Engineering, Management and Technology, Istanbul, Turkey, Krigsvoll, G., Fumo, M., & Morbiducci, R. (2007). National and international (ISO and CEN) standardisation relevant for sustainability in construction. First Workshop COST Action C, La Monaca, S., Spector, K., & Kobus, J. (2019). Financing the green transition. Journal of International Affairs, 73(1), 17-32. Li, X., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, Z. (2010). An LCA-based environmental impact assessment model for construction processes. Building and Environment, 45(3), 766-775. Miller, R. E., & Blair, P. D. (2009). Input-output analysis: foundations and extensions. Cambridge university press. Minkov, N., Schneider, L., Lehmann, A., & Finkbeiner, M. (2015). Type III Environmental Declaration Programmes and harmonization of product category rules: status quo and practical challenges. Journal of cleaner production, 94, 235-246. Ngwepe, L., & Aigbavboa, C. (2015). A theoretical review of building life cycle stages and their related environmental impacts. J. Civil Eng. Environ. Technol, 2(13), 7-15. Olsson, A., & Steko, A. (2015). Defining a reference building according to LEED v4, to enable comparison of LCA alternatives. Pajula, T., Vatanen, S., Pihkola, H., Grönman, K., Kasurinen, H., & Soukka, R. (2018). Carbon handprint guide. Pellegrini, L. (2022). SRI, ESG and Value of Sustainability. In Climate Change Adaptation, Governance and New Issues of Value: Measuring the Impact of ESG Scores on CoE and Firm Performance (pp. 61-93). Springer. Polli, G. H. B. (2022). Analysis of GRESB and ISO 21929-1 Indicators and Which Ones Cover more the Sustainable Development of the United Nations Goals. Responsibility and Sustainability, 7(2), 36-58. Pomponi, F., & Moncaster, A. (2017). Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. Journal of cleaner production, 143, 710-718. Powell, J. C., Pearce, D. W., & Craighill, A. L. (1997). Approaches to valuation in LCA impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2, 11-15. Quazi, H. A., Khoo, Y.-K., Tan, C.-M., & Wong, P.-S. (2001). Motivation for ISO 14000 certification: development of a predictive model. Omega, 29(6), 525-542. Ram, A., & Sharma, P. (2017). A study on life cycle assessment. Int. J. Eng. Adv. Technol.(IJEAT), 6, 197-201. Rama, M., Entrena-Barbero, E., Dias, A. C., Moreira, M. T., Feijoo, G., & Gonzalez-Garcia, S. (2021). Evaluating the carbon footprint of a Spanish city through environmentally extended input output analysis and comparison with life cycle assessment. Science of the total environment, 762, 143133. Ranger, N., Gohar, L., Lowe, J., Bowen, A., & Ward, R. (2010). Mitigating climate change through reductions in greenhouse gas emissions: is it possible to limit global warming to no more than 1.5 C. Policy brief. Rezaallah, A., Bolognesi, C., & Khoraskani, R. A. (2012). LEED and BREEAM; Comparison between policies, assessment criteria and calculation methods. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Building Sustainability Assessment (BSA 2012), Porto, Portugal, Rønning, A., & Brekke, A. (2014). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of the building sector: strengths and weaknesses. In Eco-efficient construction and building materials (pp. 63-83). Elsevier. Sartori, T., Drogemuller, R., Omrani, S., & Lamari, F. (2021). A schematic framework for life cycle assessment (LCA) and green building rating system (GBRS). Journal of Building Engineering, 38, 102180. Scheuer, C., Keoleian, G. A., & Reppe, P. (2003). Life cycle energy and environmental performance of a new university building: modeling challenges and design implications. Energy and Buildings, 35(10), 1049-1064. Schmidt, A. (2012). Analysis of five approaches to environmental assessment of building components in a whole building context. Report commissioned by Eurima. FORCE Technology, Applied Environmental Assessment. Secretary-General, U., Initiative, U. F., & Compact, U. G. Principles forResponsible Investment. Sentman, S. D. (2009). Healthy buildings: Green building standards, benefits, and incentives. The Journal of Biolaw and Business, 12(1), 4. Shaked, S., Crettaz, P., Saade-Sbeih, M., Jolliet, O., & Jolliet, A. (2015). Environmental life cycle assessment. CRC Press. Shehab, A. R. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) considerations in real estate investments. Impact of environmental performance disclosure, activities and score on financial performance of SIIQ. Shideler, J. C., Hetzel, J., Shideler, J. C., & Hetzel, J. (2021). Measuring, reporting, and verification. Introduction to Climate Change Management: Transitioning to a Low-Carbon Economy, 107-137. Stumpf, A. L., Stidwell IV, S., Panozzo, B. D., Ehlschlaeger, C. R., & Fuhler, M. R. (2023). Analysis of the Army Transition from LEED 2009 to LEED v4, with Updated LEED 4.1 Credits. Sullivan, R., & Fiestas, H. V. (2008). Responsible Investment: A force for poverty alleviation. Oxfam. Sun, X., Pan, X., Jin, C., Li, Y., Xu, Q., Zhang, D., & Li, H. (2022). Life Cycle Assessment-Based Carbon Footprint Accounting Model and Analysis for Integrated Energy Stations in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(24), 16451. Turner, C., Frankel, M., & Council, U. (2008). Energy performance of LEED for new construction buildings. New Buildings Institute, 4(4), 1-42. Van Der Straaten, J. (1992). The Dutch national environmental policy plan: to choose or to lose. Environmental Politics, 1(1), 45-71. Vierra, S. (2016). Green building standards and certification systems. National Institute of Building Sciences, Washington, DC. Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth (Vol. 9). New society publishers. Wiedmann, T., & Minx, J. (2008). A definition of ‘carbon footprint’. Ecological economics research trends, 1(2008), 1-11. Yatarkalkmaz, M. M., & Özdemir, M. B. (2019). The calculation of greenhouse gas emissions of a family and projections for emission reduction. Journal of Energy Systems, 3(3), 96-110. Yates, J., & Murphy, C. N. (2007). Coordinating international standards: the formation of the ISO. Yudelson, J. (2010). The green building revolution. Island Press. Zairis, G., Liargovas, P., & Apostolopoulos, N. (2024). Sustainable finance and ESG importance: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Sustainability, 16(7), 2878. Zamagni, A., Pesonen, H.-L., & Swarr, T. (2013). From LCA to Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment: concept, practice and future directions. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 1637-1641. Zhang, X., Zhan, C., Wang, X., & Li, G. (2019). Asian green building rating tools: A comparative study on scoring methods of quantitative evaluation systems. Journal of cleaner production, 218, 880-895. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93949 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 建築業是全球碳排放的主要來源之一,因此該行業必須採取全面的策略並遵循可信的標準來管理其碳足跡。因此,本文討論了兩個綠色建築認證系統:全球廣泛認可的標準 LEED(能源與環境設計領導認證)和臺灣本地的認證系統 EEWH RS(生態、節能、減少廢物和健康---- 住宅類)。這些系統為能源效率、節水和廢物管理設置了基準。
本研究另一方面是檢視 LEED 和 EEWH RS 與 GRESB 問卷的兼容性,以找出一致的領域。通過將永續發展目標 (SDGs) 和環境、社會與治理 (ESG) 標準納入評估框架,旨在提高 GRESB 評分的同時也能促進SDGs的社會福祉,提昇建築綜合的永續性。除此之外,本文還強調了生命周期評估 (LCA) 作為全面環境評估工具的重要性,因為這往往是當前系統未能完全解決的問題。通過比較台灣的產品類別規則 (PCR) 和目前具有共識性的歐洲標準 EN15978,強調了差異並尋求一致,以增強可比性,確保不同地區和建築類型的環境績效評估具有一致性和意義。 這種整體方法不僅可以辨識建築營造業碳管理問題,亦促進了建築行業的永續發展。同時,將生命周期思維和永續性標準納入評估框架,能使利益相關者能夠做出符合更廣泛環境目標的明智決策。本文還探討了永續建築發展的市場層面,以同時兼顧利害關係人經濟效益、國家發展,並為實現全球氣候目標做出貢獻。最後,本文還建議擴大研究範圍,以涵蓋商業建築、工業設施和翻新項目,並使用現場調查和租戶訪談等多樣化的數據收集方法,以更深入地了解實際實現永續發展目標的挑戰和機遇。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The construction industry is one of the major sources of global carbon emissions, and therefore, the sector must adopt comprehensive strategies and follow credible standards to manage its carbon footprint. This paper discusses two green building certification systems: the globally recognized standard LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) and Taiwan's local certification system EEWH RS (Ecology, Energy Saving, Waste Reduction, and Health for Residences). These systems set benchmarks for energy efficiency, water conservation, and waste management.
The study examines the compatibility of LEED and EEWH RS with the GRESB questionnaire to identify consistent areas. By incorporating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) standards into the evaluation framework, the aim is to improve GRESB scores while promoting the social welfare goals of the SDGs, thereby enhancing the overall sustainability of buildings. Additionally, the paper highlights the importance of Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) as a comprehensive environmental assessment tool, addressing issues that current systems may not fully resolve. By comparing Taiwan's Product Category Rules (PCR) with the widely accepted European standard EN15978, the study emphasizes the differences and seeks to harmonize them to enhance comparability, ensuring consistent and meaningful environmental performance assessments across different regions and building types. This holistic approach not only identifies carbon management issues in the construction industry but also promotes the sustainable development of the building sector. Integrating life cycle thinking and sustainability standards into the evaluation framework enables stakeholders to make informed decisions aligned with broader environmental goals. The paper also explores the market aspects of sustainable building development, balancing stakeholder economic benefits and national development, and contributing to global climate goals. Finally, it recommends expanding the research scope to cover commercial buildings, industrial facilities, and renovation projects, using diverse data collection methods such as field surveys and tenant interviews to gain deeper insights into the challenges and opportunities of achieving sustainable development goals in practice. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-09T16:37:41Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-09T16:37:41Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | Table of Contents
中文摘要 i Abstract ii Table of Contents iv List of Figures vii List of Tables viii Chapter 1: Introduction 1 1.1 Background and Motivation 1 1.2 Research Purpose and Structure 4 Chapter 2: Literature Review 7 2.1 The Evolution of Life Cycle Assessment 7 2.1.1 Tracing LCA's Crucial Role in Carbon Mitigation 7 2.1.2 Tracking LCA’s Origins 10 2.1.3 Navigating LCA’s Impact on Building Sector 16 2.2 Cohesive Regulatory Landscape 18 2.2.1 Reviewing the History of Environmental Management System 18 2.2.2 Exploring Environmental Standards in Building Sector 21 2.3 Building Standards in Sustainability Practices 32 2.3.1 Overviewing LEED's Development 32 2.3.2 Evaluating the Sustainability through LEED 36 2.3.3 The Features of EEWH RS 38 2.4 Integrated ESG Framework 41 2.4.1 Main Storyline of ESG Indices 41 2.4.2 ESG in the real estate sector ---- GRESB 43 2.4.3 The Relationship Between Sustainability and Finance 45 Chapter 3: Methodology 51 3.1 Research Design 51 3.2 Research Process 52 3.3 Data Collection and Analysis 53 3.3.1 Collection and Analysis of LEED Indicators 53 3.3.2 Collection and Analysis of EEWH RS Indicator 58 3.3.3 Examine GRESB questionnaire 59 3.3.4 Comparative Analysis 62 3.3.5 Life cycle management: Taiwan’s PCR vs EN15978 64 3.4 Sustainable Index 65 3.4.1 The relationship between ESG and SDGs 65 3.4.2 Sustainable Impact 67 Chapter 4: Result and Limitation 69 4.1 The Compatibility of LEED and GRESB 69 4.2 The Comparison between LEED and EEWH RS 77 4.3 The Comparison of PCR and EN 15978 82 4.4 Sustainable Influence 83 4.5 Limitation 89 Chapter 5: Conclusion and Suggestion 91 5.1 Conclusion 91 5.2 Suggestion 92 Reference 93 | - |
dc.language.iso | en | - |
dc.title | 提升建築永續性: LEED、EEWH-RS 與 GRESB 的比較分析 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Empowering Sustainable Building: Comparative Analysis of LEED, EEWH-RS, and GRESB | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 謝宜桓;李明旭 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Yi-Huan Hsieh;Ming-Hsu Li | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 綠建築標章,生命週期,永續發展, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Building and Construction,Green Building Certification,ESG,Lifecycle Assessment (LCA),Sustainability, | en |
dc.relation.page | 102 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402503 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-07 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用(校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務) | 3.76 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。