Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 森林環境暨資源學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9389
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor鄭欽龍(Chin-long Zheng)
dc.contributor.authorWei-Cha Leeen
dc.contributor.author李偉嘉zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T20:20:21Z-
dc.date.available2011-03-31
dc.date.available2021-05-20T20:20:21Z-
dc.date.copyright2009-03-31
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-03-23
dc.identifier.citation王子定 (1982) 銀合歡之培育與生產。行政院農業發展委員會。
王子定 (1988) 現代育林學。國立編譯館。
王子定、高毓斌 (1980) 孟宗竹地上部生物量、淨生長量及碳積聚。國立台灣大學森林所碩士論文。
王子定、郭寶章、高毓斌 (1985) 台灣孟宗竹之乾物生產與生物性養分循環。國家科學委員會補助計劃總結報告。
古森本 (2008) 生質能源作物之開發與潛力。農業生技產業專刊 13:46-53。
台灣綜合研究院 (2007) 我國石油供需預測。石油市場雙周報。2007.05.03。
左峻德 (2007) 我國發展生質能源產業之可行性。植物種苗生技 9:56-61。
左峻德、蘇美惠 (2007) 國內外生質酒精發展策略與推廣現況 7-16。
李守仁 (1993) 台灣地區竹產業與竹市場之研究。國立台灣大學森林所碩士論文。
李克聰 (2006) 工程經濟學。台北:華泰文化。
林國銓、杜清澤、黃菊美 (2007) 苗栗地區相思樹和木油桐人工林碳和氮累積量及生產量之估算。中華林學季刊 40(2):201-218。
林裕仁、劉瓊霦、林俊成 (2002) 台灣地區主要用材比重與碳含量測定。台灣林業科學17(3):291-299。
張四立 (2007) 我國汽油之最適價差及補貼經費規模之初探。石油市場雙周報。2007.07.25。
程煒兒、沈慈安 (1987) 恆春地區三至五年生銀合歡林分地上部養分聚積與循環。林業試驗所研究報告季刊 2(4):253-272。
黃瀕儀、黃宗煌 (2006) 推廣能源作物生產的問題與政策調和。能源季刊:1-13。
黃韻勳、吳榮華 (2008) 我國發展生質燃料的利基與問題。碳經濟 8:2-12。
劉宣成、高毓斌 (1988) 孟宗竹與銀合歡人工林生物量之綜合關係式。林業試驗所研究報告季刊 3(1):393-406。
劉宣成、高毓斌 (1988) 孟宗竹與銀合歡人工林生物量之綜合關係式。林業試驗所報告研究季刊 3(1):393-406。
劉慎孝、林子玉 (1968) 台灣中南部相思樹林分收穫表及材積表。中興大學農學院森林學系。
鄭欽龍 (1994) 森林資源利用與永續性-森林最適輪伐期之探討。中華林學季刊 27(4):63-74。
Agra, C. and F. O. Licht (2006) How Canada Ranks: A Comparative Study of National Biofuels Policies World-wide. Report for the Canadian Renewable Fuels Association.
Alzate, C. A. C. and O. J. S. Toro (2006) Energy consumption analysis of integrated flowsheets for production of fuel ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass Energy 31: 2447-2459.
BRI Energy and Bioengineering Resource Inc. (2005) Gasification-Fermentation pilot facility. BRI Energy and Bioengineering Resource Inc.
Coltrain, D. (2004) Risk factors in ethanol production. Department of Agricultural Economics.
Demirbas, A. (2001) Biomass resource facilities and biomass conversion processing for fuels and chemicals. Energy Conversion and Management 42: 1357-1378.
Demirbas, A. (2007) Progress and recent trends in biofuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science 33: 1–18.
Doering, O. C. (2004) U.S. Ethanol Policy: Is It the Best Energy Alternative? Current Agriculture, Food & Resource Issues 5: 204-211.
Donald, I. D. (2006) Silviculture and biology of short-rotation woody crops in temperate regions: Then and now. Biomass and Bioenergy 30: 696-705.
Donald, J. M. (2005) Opportunities for improving plantation productivity. How much? How quickly? How realistic? Biomass and Bioenergy 28: 249-266.
Elauria, J. C., M. L. Y. Castro and D. A. Racelis (2003) Sustainable biomass production for energy in the Philippines. Biomass and Bioenergy 25: 531-540.
Faúndez, P. (2004) Potential costs of four short-rotation silvicultural regimes used for the production of energy. Biomass and Bioenergy 24: 373-380.
Food and Agriculture (2008) High-level conference on world food security. The challenges of climate change and bioenergy.
Gan, J. and C. T. Smith (2007) Co-benefits of utilizing logging residues for bioenergy production: The case for East Texas, USA. Biomass and Bioenergy 31: 623-630.
Gardner, B. (2003) Fuel Ethanol Subsidies and Farm Price Support: Boon or Boondoggle? Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
Gardner, B. (2007) Fuel Ethanol Subsidies and Farm Price Support. Journal of Agricultural & Food Industrial Organization 5(4): 1-20.
Gorter, H. D. and D. R. Just (2007) The economics of a biofuel consumption mandate and excise-tax exemption: An empirical example of U.S. ethanol policy. Munich Personal RePEc Archive No. 5503.
Graham, R. L., L. L. Wright and A. F. Turhollow (1992) The potential for short-rotation woody crops to reduce U. S. co2 emission. Climate Change 22(3): 223-238.
Hahn, R. and C. Cecot (2008) The Benefits and Costs of Ethanol: An evaluation of the government's analysis. AEI Center for Regulatory and Market Studies. Telos Ingenia Consultants & Engineers.
Hitofumi A., A. Katayama, P. S. Bhuwneshwar, T. Tsuyoshi, S. Sat, P. Phon, A. A. Mark and F. G. Pauline (2007) Potential for rural electrification based on biomass gasification in Cambodia. Biomass and Bioenergy 31: 656-664.
Horngren, C. T., F. George and M. D. Srikant (1994) Cost accounting : a managerial emphasis. Prentice Hall.
Innovative Natural Resource Solutions (2006) Wood-Based Bio-Fuels and Bio-Products: A Maine Status Report. Maine Department of Economic & Community Development Office of Innovation.
International Energy Agency (2004) Biofuels For Transport An International Perspective: 171-179.
International Energy Agency (2007) Biofuel Production. IEA Energy Technology Essentials.
Kasteren, J. M. N. V. (2005) Bio-ethanol from bio-syngas. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven.
Kim, S.and B. E. Dale (2004) Global potential bioethanol production from wasted crops and crop residues. Biomass and Bioenergy 26: 361-375.
Kimmins, J. P. (1997) Sustainability of forest bioenergy production in the face of changing paradigms. Biomass and Bioenergy 13: 201-212.
Koh, M. P. and W. K. Hoi (2003) Sustainable biomass production for energy in Malaysia. Biomass and Bioenergy 25: 517-529.
Kszos, L. A., M. E. Downing, L. L. Wright, J. H. Cushman, S. B. McLaughlin, V. R. Tolbert, G. A. Tuskan and M. E. Walsh (2000) Bioenergy feedstock development program status report. Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 5049.
Malça, J. and F. Freire (2006) Renewability and life-cycle energy efficiency of bioethanol and bio-ethyl tertiary butyl ether (bioETBE): Assessing the implications of allocation. Energy 31: 3362-3380.
Manley, A. and J. Richardson (1995) Silviculture and economic benefits of producing wood energy from conventional forestry systems and measures to mitigate impacts. Biomass and Bioenergy 9: 89-105.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2007) Next Generation Fuels-What’s Old Is New Again. A national laboratory of the U. S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2007) Research Advances Cellulosic Ethanol. A national laboratory of the U. S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (2007) Thermochemical Ethanol via Indirect Gasification and Mixed Alcohol Synthesis of Lignocellulosic Biomass. A national laboratory of the U. S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy.
Richard, Z. and D. D. Dwight (1994) Benefit-cost analysis in theory and practice. HarperCollins College Publishers.
Sochacki, S. J., R. J. Harper and K. R. J. Smettemb (2007) Estimation of woody biomass production from a short-rotation bio-energy system in semi-arid Australia. Biomass and Bioenergy 31: 608-616.
Tharakan, P. J., A. V. Timothy, C. A. Lindsey, L. P. Abrahamsona and E. H. White (2005) Evaluating the impact of three incentive programs on the economics of cofiring willow biomass with coal in New York State. Energy Policy 33: 337-347.
Tuskan G. A. (1998) Short-rotation woody crop supply systems in the united states: What do we know and what do we need to know? Biomass and Bioenergy 14( 4): 307-315.
Tyner, W. E. and F. Taheripour (2007) Renewable Energy Policy Alternatives for the Future. American Agricultural Economics Association 89(5) : 1303-1310.
Tyner, W. E. and M. Caffe (2007) US and French Biofuels Policy - Possibilities for the Future. Purdue University.
United State Department of Agriculture (2006) The economic feasibility of ethanol production from sugar in the united states. United State Department of Agriculture.
Updegraff, K., M. J. Baughman and S. J. Taff (2004) Environmental benefits of cropland conversion to hybrid poplar:economic and policy considerations. Biomass and Bioenergy 27: 411-428.
Weimer, D. L. and A. R. Vining (2005) Policy analysis : concepts and practice. Pearson Prentice Hall.
Wright, L. L. and A. R. Ehrenshaft (1990) Short rotation woody crops program: annual progress report for 1989. Environmental Sciences Division Publication No. 3484.
Ensyn Group Inc. (2008)
http://www.ensyn.com/
Gary Schnitkey (2007)
http://www.farmdoc.uiuc.edu/manage/newsletters/fefo07_11/fefo07_11.html
Official Nebraska Government Website (2008)
http://www.neo.ne.gov/statshtml/66.html
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9389-
dc.description.abstract生質酒精為可再生性資源,能作為汽油的替代燃料,成為有效舒緩能源、環境問題之對策。本文旨在擬定並評估以短輪伐期木質作物製造生質酒精的經營計畫。首先,分別根據銀合歡、孟宗竹與相思樹三樹種之特性,擬定林農木竹材生產供作廠商製造生質酒精之經營方案。並以成本效益分析將經營方案之投入成本與產出效益貨幣化,藉以評估三經營方案之淨效益現值、益本比、內部報酬率,再就重要變數行敏感度分析,最後參照評估結果擬定政府能源政策措施。
本研究顯示三經營方案於人力與資本等投入集約程度依序為銀合歡、孟宗竹與相思樹;單位面積土地酒精之產出效率依序為孟宗竹6.12公秉/公頃/年、銀合歡4.77公秉/公頃/年與相思樹4.10公秉/公頃/年;三種木竹製造酒精之投資成本效益淨現值依序為銀合歡130.3百萬元、孟宗竹7.5百萬元與相思樹-514.2百萬元。本研究顯示,擬在台灣利用短輪伐期木質作物發展氣化合成生質酒精,以有限土地生產最多國內生質酒精為目標時,孟宗竹經營方案較為適合;而在以投資效益最大為目標時,銀合歡經營方案則較為合適。就敏感度分析可知,木竹材產量與酒精價格對經營利潤影響顯著,其中又以銀合歡經營方案較孟宗竹經營方案能承受更高的風險。在比較能源政策措施上,政策目標為酒精添加3% 時,以補貼政府需負擔25.28億元的國庫支出,以強制添加汽油消費者需增加負擔21.12億元。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBioethanol is a renewable resource as petroleum substitution, relieving the energy and environmental problems effectively. The purpose of the thesis is devising and assessing the management plan which is using short rotation woody crops on gasification and catalyst of bioethanol in Taiwan. At first, according to the characteristics of White Popinac (Leucaena leucocephala), Mosochiku (Phyllostachys pubescens) and Taiwan Acacia (Acacia confuse), and to draw up the business plan for forestry farms produce timber and bamboo for bioethanol manufacturers to produce bioethanol. Second, Using cost benefit analysis turns input cost and output benefit into price, then assess net present value, benefit-cost ratio, internal rent to these three business plans; furthermore, choose the important parameters to perform sensitivity analysis. In the end, consult assessment result to draft government energy policy.
This research shows the gradation of these three business plans in intensive farming is White Popinac, Mosochiku and Taiwan Acacia; the gradation of Ethanol production in unit area is Mosochiku 6.12 kl/ha/y, White Popinac 4.77 kl/ha/y, Taiwan Acacia 4.10 kl/ha/y. The gradation of cost benefit analysis in net present value is White Popinac 130.3 million dollars, Mosochiku 7.5 million dollars, Taiwan Acacia -514.2 million dollars. By sensitive analysis, timber, bamboo production and bioethanol price both are important parameters. In addition, White Popinac business plan with better risk endurance than Mosochiku. According to energy policy, when the goal of policy is adding 3% ethanol to gasoline, government need to spend 25.28 billion dollars on subsidies and gasoline and consumers of gasoline have to increase 21.12 billion dollars.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:20:21Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R95625021-1.pdf: 651356 bytes, checksum: 6d8b4143fde52328c7576c7b4f9d84fb (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontents第一章 緒論 1
第一節、研究背景及問題 1
第二節、研究目的 3
第三節、研究架構 4
第二章 文獻回顧 5
第一節、短輪伐期木質作物經營之研究 5
第二節、生質酒精製造經營之研究 8
第三節、酒精產業政策分析 14
第三章 研究理論與方法 20
第一節、成本效益分析理論 20
第二節、研究方法 21
第四章 生質酒精經營計畫案例分析 30
第一節、銀合歡經營方案 30
第二節、孟宗竹經營方案 39
第三節、相思樹經營方案 47
第四節、方案比較 54
第五節、政策措施分析 57
第五章 結論 69
參考文獻 71
附錄 76
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title台灣利用短輪伐期木質作物生產生質酒精之成本效益分析zh_TW
dc.titleA Cost-Benefit Analysis on the Use of Short Rotation Woody Crops for Producing Bio-Ethanol in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-1
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee高成炎(Cheng-Yan Kao),賴玉菁(Yu-Ching Lai),楊增華(Tzeng-hua Yang),林子倫(Zih-Lun Lin)
dc.subject.keyword短輪伐期木質作物、生質酒精,生物能源,成本效益分析,補貼,強制添加,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordshort rotation woody crops,bioethanol,bioenergy,cost benefit analysis,price subsidy,consumption mandate,en
dc.relation.page80
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2009-03-23
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept森林環境暨資源學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:森林環境暨資源學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf636.09 kBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved