請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93866完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 簡睿哲 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ruey-Jer Jean | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 許庭瑄 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Hsuan Hsu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-08T16:38:54Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-09 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-08 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-08-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Allport, G. W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation.
Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological monographs, 47(1), i. Amirazodi, F., & Amirazodi, M. (2011). Personality traits and Self-esteem. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 29, 713-716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.296 Baumeister, R. F. (2013). Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self-regard. Springer Science & Business Media. Baumeister, R. F., Campbell, J. D., Krueger, J. I., & Vohs, K. D. (2003). Does high self-esteem cause better performance, interpersonal success, happiness, or healthier lifestyles? Psychological science in the public interest, 4(1), 1-44. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social responsibilities of the businessman. University of Iowa Press. Brick, C., & Lewis, G. J. (2016). Unearthing the “green” personality: Core traits predict environmentally friendly behavior. Environment and behavior, 48(5), 635-658. Brown, J. D., & Smart, S. (1991). The self and social conduct: Linking self-representations to prosocial behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 368. Byrne, B. M. (1996). Measuring self-concept across the life span: Issues and instrumentation. American Psychological Association. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management review, 4(4), 497-505. Carroll, A. B. (2015). Corporate social responsibility: The centerpiece of competing and complementary frameworks. Organizational Dynamics, 44(2), 87-96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2015.02.002 Cattell, R. B. (1946). Description and measurement of personality. Cheng, S.-T., & Hamid, P. N. (1995). An error in the use of translated scales: The Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale for Chinese. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 81(2), 431-434. Costa Jr, P. T., McCrae, R. R., & Dye, D. A. (1991). Facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness: A revision of the NEO Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(9), 887-898. Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Neo PI-R professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, 396. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1985). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Psychological Assessment Resources (PAR). Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 5. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (2008). The revised neo personality inventory (neo-pi-r). The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, 2(2), 179-198. https://books.google.com.tw/books?hl=zh-TW&lr=&id=sdD41qBTJSUC&oi=fnd&pg=PA179&dq=Revised+NEO+Personality+Inventory+(NEO+PI-R)+and+NEO+Five-factor+Inventory+(NEO-FFI)&ots=Xn5o9DaT8I&sig=1UUqTAwCiyRTpfa6PAaC53fqx5E&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q=Revised%20NEO%20Personality%20Inventory%20(NEO%20PI-R)%20and%20NEO%20Five-factor%20Inventory%20(NEO-FFI)&f=false Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California management review, 2(3), 70-76. Davis, K. (1967). Understanding the social responsibility puzzle. Business Horizons, 10(4), 45-50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(67)90007-9 De Groot, J. I., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and behavior, 40(3), 330-354. Elkington, J., & Rowlands, I. H. (1999). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Alternatives Journal, 25(4), 42. Fiske, D. W. (1949). Consistency of the factorial structures of personality ratings from different sources. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 44(3), 329. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312 Frederick, W. C. (1960). The Growing Concern over Business Responsibility. California management review, 2(4), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165405 Goldberg, L. R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. Review of personality and social psychology, 2(1), 141-165. Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological assessment, 4(1), 26. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality psychology in Europe, 7(1), 7-28. Grubb, E. L., & Grathwohl, H. L. (1967). Consumer self-concept, symbolism and market behavior: A theoretical approach. Journal of marketing, 31(4), 22-27. Hair, J. F., Matthews, L. M., Matthews, R. L., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). PLS-SEM or CB-SEM: updated guidelines on which method to use. International Journal of Multivariate Data Analysis, 1(2), 107-123. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDA.2017.087624 Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing theory and Practice, 19(2), 139-152. Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203 Haws, K. L., Winterich, K. P., & Naylor, R. W. (2014). Seeing the world through GREEN-tinted glasses: Green consumption values and responses to environmentally friendly products. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(3), 336-354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2013.11.002 Hirsh, J. B. (2010). Personality and environmental concern. Journal of environmental psychology, 30(2), 245-248. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.004 John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy. Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 3(2), 114-158. Kernis, M. H. (2003). Toward a conceptualization of optimal self-esteem. Psychological inquiry, 14(1), 1-26. Kline, R. B., & Santor, D. A. (1999). Principles & practice of structural equation modelling. Canadian Psychology, 40(4), 381. Kvasova, O. (2015). The Big Five personality traits as antecedents of eco-friendly tourist behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 83, 111-116. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.04.011 Leung, S. O., & Wong, P. M. (2008). Validity and reliability of Chinese Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale. New Horizons in Education, 56, 62-69. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective. Guilford Press. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (2010). NEO inventories for the NEO personality inventory-3 (NEO-PI-3), NEO five-factor inventory-3 (NEO-FFI-3), NEO personality inventory-revised (NEO PI-R): professional manual. (No Title). McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five‐factor model and its applications. Journal of personality, 60(2), 175-215. Milfont, T. L., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). The big five personality traits and environmental engagement: Associations at the individual and societal level. Journal of environmental psychology, 32(2), 187-195. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.12.006 Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. Journal of consumer affairs, 35(1), 45-72. Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. The journal of abnormal and social psychology, 66(6), 574. Orth, U., Robins, R. W., & Widaman, K. F. (2012). Life-span development of self- esteem and its effects on important life outcomes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1271. Peterson, R. A. (1994). A Meta-analysis of Cronbach's Coefficient Alpha. Journal of consumer research, 21(2), 381-391. https://doi.org/10.1086/209405 Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard business review, 84(12), 78-92. Prendergast, G. P., & Tsang, A. S. L. (2019). Explaining socially responsible consumption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(1), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-02-2018-2568 Roberts, J. A. (1993). Sex differences in socially responsible consumers' behavior. Psychological reports, 73(1), 139-148. Robins, R. W., Tracy, J. L., Trzesniewski, K., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. D. (2001). Personality Correlates of Self-Esteem. Journal of Research in personality, 35(4), 463-482. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jrpe.2001.2324 Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. Free press. Rosenberg, M. (1965). Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSE). Acceptance and commitment therapy. Measures package, 61(52), 18. Rosenberg, M. (1979). Conceiving the self. In Conceiving the self (pp. 318-318). Rosenberg, M., & Pearlin, L. I. (1978). Social class and self-esteem among children and adults. American Journal of sociology, 84(1), 53-77. Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg's unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of personality assessment, 63(3), 506-516. Schmitt, D. P., & Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(4), 623. Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: Empathizing with nature: The effects ofPerspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 391-406. Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of environmental psychology, 21(4), 327-339. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 25, pp. 1-65). Elsevier. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? Journal of social issues, 50(4), 19-45. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(3), 550. Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22(2), 159-170. Sirgy, M. J. (1982). Self-concept in consumer behavior: A critical review. Journal of consumer research, 9(3), 287-300. Sparks, P., Jessop, D. C., Chapman, J., & Holmes, K. (2010). Pro‐environmental actions, climate change, and defensiveness: Do self‐affirmations make a difference to people's motives and beliefs about making a difference? British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(3), 553-568. Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 407-424. Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1994). The Value Basis of Environmental Concern. Journal of social issues, 50(3), 65-84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1994.tb02420.x Tang, C. M. F., & Lam, D. (2017). The role of extraversion and agreeableness traits on Gen Y’s attitudes and willingness to pay for green hotels. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29(1), 607-623. Tupes, E. C., & Christal, R. E. (1961). Recurrent personality factors based on trait ratings. Journal of personality, 60(2), 225-251. Webb, D. J., Mohr, L. A., & Harris, K. E. (2008). A re-examination of socially responsible consumption and its measurement. Journal of Business Research, 61(2), 91-98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.007 Webster Jr, F. E. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of consumer research, 2(3), 188-196. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of management review, 16(4), 691-718. 朱思齊. (2016). Goldberg's大五因素特質量表國際人格題庫50題範本之繁體中文版發展 國立東華大學]. 臺灣博碩士論文知識加值系統. 花蓮縣. https://hdl.handle.net/11296/sgrc52 巫博瀚；賴英娟；施慶麟. (2013). 「Rosenberg 自尊量表」之試題衡鑑：評等量尺模型的應用 [Evaluation of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale Using the Rating Scale Model]. 測驗學刊, 60卷2期, 263-290. https://www.lawdata.com.tw/anglekmc/ttswebx?@0:0:1:lawkm!ID%3DP00716002_263@@ 李仁豪, & 陳怡君. (2016). IPIP 五大人格量表簡版的發展及其跨年齡層的測量不變性檢定. 教育研究與發展期刊, 12(4), 87- | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93866 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 隨著全球問題日益嚴重和社會責任意識的提升，消費者的購買行為和決策動機逐漸發生變化。由於針對社會責任消費此一新興消費模式的相關研究仍較缺乏，且過去較少討論消費者心理因素(如：人格特質、自尊等)對社會責任消費的影響，故本研究旨在探討五大人格特質(外向性、友善性、嚴謹性、神經質、開放性)對社會責任消費的影響，並以自尊作為中介變數進行分析，進一步探討自尊在人格特質與社會責任消費之間所發揮的作用。本研究研究目的包含：
(1) 探討五大人格特質與社會責任消費的關係 (2) 分析自尊在人格特質與社會責任消費間的中介作用 (3) 深化對消費者行為心理機制的理解 本研究使用SPSS與SmartPLS-4作為分析工具，並使用線上問卷進行資料蒐集，研究結果顯示，在人格特質與自尊的關係中，外向性、嚴謹性、神經質、開放性皆與整體自尊密切相關；在人格特質與社會責任消費的關係中，外向性、嚴謹性、開放性與社會責任消費呈顯著正相關；而在自尊的中介作用分析中，自尊在神經質與社會責任消費之間具有顯著的完全中介作用。 本研究深化人格特質、自尊與社會責任消費之間關係的理解，為企業相關實務應用提供建議，有助於制定更精準的市場劃分與行銷策略。未來研究可進一步探討其他可能的中介或調節變數、擴大樣本範圍，或結合質性研究分析消費者動機，深入了解消費者購買決策背後複雜的心理因素。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | As global issues receive more attention and social responsibility awareness increases, consumers’ purchasing behaviors and motivations are changing. Since there is still limited research on this emerging trend of socially responsible consumption, and few studies have explored how psychological factors (such as personality traits and self-esteem) affect this behavior, our study aims to examine how the Big Five personality traits (extraversion, agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness) influence socially responsible consumption. We also analyze the role of self-esteem as a mediator to between personality traits and socially responsible consumption.
The main objectives of this study are: (1) To explore the relationship between the Big Five personality traits and socially responsible consumption. (2) To analyze the mediating effect of self-esteem between personality traits and socially responsible consumption. (3) To deepen our understanding of the psychological mechanisms behind consumer behavior. We used SPSS and SmartPLS-4 for data analysis and collected data through online surveys. Our findings show that extraversion, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness are closely related to overall self-esteem. Extraversion, conscientiousness, and openness have significant positive correlations with socially responsible consumption. In the mediation analysis, self-esteem fully mediates the relationship between neuroticism and socially responsible consumption. This study enhances our understanding of the relationship between personality traits, self-esteem, and socially responsible consumption. It provides practical suggestions for businesses, helping them develop more precise market segmentations and marketing strategies. Future research could explore other potential mediating or moderating variables, expand the sample size, and combine qualitative research to analyze consumer motivations, gaining deeper insights into the complex psychological factors behind consumer purchasing decisions. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-08T16:38:54Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-08T16:38:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要 ................................................................................................................................... i
Abstract ............................................................................................................................. ii 目次 ................................................................................................................................. iii 圖次 ................................................................................................................................... v 表次 ................................................................................................................................. vi 第一章 緒論 ..................................................................................................................... 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 ................................................................................... 1 第二節 研究目的 ............................................................................................... 2 第三節 研究流程 ............................................................................................... 2 第二章 文獻探討 ............................................................................................................. 4 第一節 五大人格特質 ....................................................................................... 4 2.2.1 人格特質的發展與定義 ...................................................................... 4 2.2.2 五大人格特質的發展 .......................................................................... 4 2.2.2 五大人格特質量表 .............................................................................. 6 第二節 自尊 ....................................................................................................... 8 2.3.1 自我概念之發展 .................................................................................. 8 2.3.2 自尊之意涵 .......................................................................................... 9 2.3.3 自尊測量量表 .................................................................................... 10 第三節 消費價值觀 ......................................................................................... 10 2.4.1 價值之定義 ..................................................................................... 10 2.4.2 消費價值觀 ..................................................................................... 14 第四節 環保價值觀與綠色消費 ..................................................................... 15 第五節 社會責任消費 ..................................................................................... 15 第三章 研究假設與架構 ............................................................................................... 18 第一節 研究假設 ............................................................................................. 18 3.1.1 人格特質與自尊 ................................................................................ 18 3.1.2 人格特質與社會責任消費 ................................................................ 20 3.1.3 自尊與社會責任消費 ........................................................................ 21 3.1.4 自尊的中介效果 ................................................................................ 22 第二節 研究架構 ............................................................................................. 23 第四章 研究設計與方法 ............................................................................................... 24 第一節 量表發展與問卷設計 ......................................................................... 24 4.1.1 IPIP人格量表 ..................................................................................... 24 4.1.2 Rosenberg自尊量表 ........................................................................... 25 4.1.3 社會責任消費量表 ............................................................................ 26 第二節 資料分析方法 ..................................................................................... 27 第五章 資料分析與假設結果 ....................................................................................... 29 第一節 樣本蒐集方法 ..................................................................................... 29 第二節 信效度分析 ......................................................................................... 29 5.1.1 信度分析 ............................................................................................ 29 5.1.2 效度分析 ............................................................................................ 29 第三節 共線性分析與模型評估 ..................................................................... 34 第四節 敘述性統計分析 ................................................................................. 35 5.2.1 樣本基本資料分析 ............................................................................ 35 5.2.2 人格特質、自尊與社會責任消費之敘述統計分析 ........................ 36 第五節 假說驗證 ............................................................................................. 37 第六章 結論與建議 ....................................................................................................... 40 第一節 研究結果 ............................................................................................. 40 6.1.1 人格特質與自尊之研究結果討論 .................................................... 40 6.1.2 人格特質與社會責任消費之研究結果討論 .................................... 41 6.1.3 自尊與社會責任消費之研究結果討論 ............................................ 43 6.1.4 自尊的中介作用分析 ........................................................................ 43 第二節 企業實務應用 ..................................................................................... 45 第三節 研究限制與建議 ................................................................................. 46 附錄：問卷題目 ............................................................................................................. 48 參考文獻 ......................................................................................................................... 51 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 社會責任消費 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 消費者價值觀 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 企業社會責任 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 五大人格特質 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 自尊 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Big Five personality traits | en |
| dc.subject | self-esteem | en |
| dc.subject | consumer value | en |
| dc.subject | CSR | en |
| dc.subject | socially responsible consumption | en |
| dc.title | 五大人格特質、自我概念與社會責任消費之關聯探究 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Relationship Between the Big Five Personality Traits, Self-Concept, and Socially Responsible Consumption | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何筱文;林谷合 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hsiao-Wen Ho;Ku-Ho Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 五大人格特質,自尊,消費者價值觀,企業社會責任,社會責任消費, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Big Five personality traits,self-esteem,consumer value,CSR,socially responsible consumption, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 55 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402725 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-07 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國際企業學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-07-30 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國際企業學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 1.58 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。