請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93537完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 王宏文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Hong-Wung Wang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭庭瑜 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yu Zheng | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-08-05T16:25:38Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-08-06 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-08-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-31 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文文獻
丁仁方，1999，〈統合化、半侍從結構、與台灣地方派系的轉型〉，《政治科學論叢》，10：59-82。 王金壽，2004a，〈瓦解中的地方派系: 以屏東縣為例〉，《台灣社會學》，(7)，177-207。 王金壽，2004b，〈重返風芒縣：國民黨選舉機器的成功與失敗〉，《台灣政治學刊》，8(1)：99-146。 王金壽，2006，〈台灣的司法獨立改革與國民黨侍從主義的崩潰〉，《台灣政治學刊》，10(1)，103-162。 王靖興，2009，〈立法委員的立法問政與選區服務之分析: 2000年政黨輪替前後的持續與變遷〉，《台灣政治學刊》，13(2)，113-169。 王業立、蔡春木，2004，〈從對立到共治：台中縣地方派系之轉變〉，《政治科學論叢》，21：189-216。 古哲瑋，2021，〈影響議員總質詢內容之因素–以第十八屆苗栗縣議員為例〉，台北：國立台灣大學公共事務研究所碩士論文。 古哲瑋、徐俊明、王宏文，2022，〈縣議員總質詢內容之分析：以第十八屆苗栗縣議員為例〉，《東吳政治學報》，40(2)：127-175。 江育誠，2022，〈官員於地方議會答詢時之避責策略分析：以苗栗縣為例〉，台北：國立台灣大學政治系碩士論文。 李敏瑋，2002，〈從苗栗縣五十年政治看地方派系的消長：以縣長、省議員為例〉，《中國地方自治》，55(10)：21-36。 何來美，1997，《劉黃演義—苗栗近代政治史話》，台北：台灣書店。 邱正一，2023，〈普遍性利益或選區相關利益？影響苗栗縣第 18 屆縣議員口頭質詢之因素〉，台北：國立台灣大學公共事務研究所碩士論文。 吳宜侃，2005，〈SNTV 選制下“立法委員連任勝選幅度模型”建立之嘗試-以第四屆區域立委為例〉，《臺灣民主季刊》，2（2）：71-99。 洪志彥，2023，〈苗栗縣地方派系與基層選舉之研究：以頭份市農會選舉為例〉，《發展與前瞻學報》，（42）：31-56。 姚惠忠，1998，〈政黨提名策略與派系輪政之競局理論分析〉，《人文及社會科學集刊》，10(3)：451-475。 苗栗縣政府，2016，《苗栗縣統計年報. 第66期》，苗栗：苗栗縣政府。 苗栗縣政府，2020，《苗栗縣統計年報. 第70期》，苗栗：苗栗縣政府。 徐俊明、古哲瑋、王宏文，2024，〈不同黨派議員口頭質詢強度的研究：以苗栗縣第十八屆議員為例，《行政暨政策學報》，78：1-32。 國家發展委員會國土區域離島發展處，2016，《都市及區域發展統計彙編. 中華民國105年》，台北：國家發展委員會。 國家發展委員會國土區域離島發展處，2020，《都市及區域發展統計彙編. 中華民國109年》，台北：國家發展委員會。 盛杏湲，1999，〈立法問政與選區服務：第三屆立法委員代表行為的探討〉，《選舉研究》，6(2)：89-120。 盛杏湲，2000，〈政黨或選區？立法委員的代表取向與行為〉，《選舉研究》，7(2)：37-73。 盛杏湲，2005，〈選區代表與集體代表：立法委員的代表角色〉，《東吳政治學報》，21：1-4。 陳明通，1995，《派系政治與台灣政治變遷》，台北：月旦。 許禎元，2003，〈內容分析法的研究步驟與在政治學領域的應用〉，《師大政治論叢》，1：1-29。 黃秀端，1992，〈立法委員對選區的認知和對選區的服務〉，《東吳政治學報》，1：401-411。 黃國敏，2014，〈苗栗縣政治版圖之研究〉，《中華行政學報》，(15)：139-166。 趙永茂，1998，〈地方政府生態與地方行政的關係〉，《政治科學論叢》，9：305-328。 羅清俊、謝瑩蒔，2008，〈選區規模與立法委員分配政策提案的關聯性研究：第三、四屆立法院的分析〉，《行政暨政策學報》，48：1-48。 羅清俊、廖健良，2009，〈選制改變前選區規模對立委分配政策提案行爲的影響〉，《台灣政治學刊》，13(1)：3-53。 貳、英文文獻 Akirav, O. (2011). The use of parliamentary questions in the Israeli parliament, 1992–96. Israel Affairs, 17(2), 259-277. Albrecht, F., Karlsson, C., & Persson, T. (2021). Patterns of Parliamentary Opposition: Empirical Evidence from the Deliberations in the German Bundestag’s Committee on European Union Affairs. Parliamentary Affairs, 74(1), 230-251. Aleman, E., Micozzi, J. P., & Ramírez, M. M. (2018). The hidden electoral connection: analysing parliamentary questions in the Chilean Congress. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 24(2), 227-244. Ames, B. (1995). Electoral rules, constituency pressures, and pork barrel: bases of voting in the Brazilian Congress. The Journal of politics, 57(2), 324-343. André, A., & Depauw, S. (2013). District magnitude and home styles of representation in European democracies. West European Politics, 36(5), 986-1006. André, A., & Depauw, S. (2018). Looking beyond the district: The representation of geographical sub-constituencies across Europe. International Political Science Review, 39(2), 256-272. Bailer, S. (2011). People's Voice or Information Pool? The Role of, and Reasons for, Parliamentary Questions in the Swiss Parliament. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 302-314. Bird, K. (2005). Gendering parliamentary questions. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(3), 353-370. Blidook, K., & Kerby, M. (2014) Constituency influence on ‘constituency members: The adaptability of roles to electoral realities in the Canadian case. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 327-339. Borghetto, E., Santana‐Pereira, J., & Freire, A. (2020). Parliamentary questions as an Instrument for geographic representation: the hard case of Portugal. Swiss Political Science Review, 26(1), 10-30. Bowler, S. (2010). Private members' bills in the UK parliament: Is there an ‘electoral connection’?. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 16(4), 476-494. Brack, N., Costa, O., & Kerrouche, E. (2016). MPs between territories, assembly and party–Investigating parliamentary behaviour at the local level in France, Belgium and Germany. French Politics, 14, 395-405. Brack, N., & Costa, O. (2019). Parliamentary questions and representation of territorial interests in the EP. The European Parliament in times of EU crisis: Dynamics and transformations, 225-254. Cain, B., Ferejohn, John, Fiorina, Morris(1986).The Constituency Service Basis of the Personal Vote for U. S. Representatives and British Members of Parliament. The American Political Science Review,78. Carey, J. M., & Shugart, M. S. (1995). Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas. Electoral studies, 14(4), 417-439. Carozzi, F., & Repetto, L. (2016). Sending the pork home: Birth town bias in transfers to Italian municipalities. Journal of Public Economics, 134, 42-52. Chiru, M. (2018). The electoral value of constituency-oriented parliamentary questions in Hungary and Romania. Parliamentary Affairs, 71(4), 950-969. Däubler, T. (2020). National policy for local reasons: how MPs represent party and geographical constituency through initiatives on social security. Acta Political, 55(3), 472-491. Dockendorff, A. (2020). When Do Legislators Respond to Their Constituencies in Party Controlled Assemblies? Evidence from Chile. Parliamentary Affairs, 73(2), 408-428. Droop, H. R. (1881). On methods of electing representatives. Journal of the Statistical Society of London, 44(2), 141-202. Dropp, K., & Peskowitz, Z. (2012). Electoral security and the provision of constituency service. The Journal of Politics, 74(1), 220-234. Fenno, R. F. (1977). U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration. The American Political Science Review 71(3), 883-917. Fernandes, J. M., Leston-Bandeira, C., & Schwemmer, C. (2018). Election proximity and representation focus in party-constrained environments. Party Politics, 24(6), 674-685. Fernandes, J. M., Geese, L., & Schwemmer, C. (2019). The impact of candidate selection rules and electoral vulnerability on legislative behavior in comparative perspective. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 270-291. Fiorina, M. P. (1973). Electoral margins, constituency influence, and policy moderation: A critical assessment. American Politics Quarterly, 1(4), 479-498. Grimmer, J., Westwood, S. J., & Messing, S. (2014). The impression of influence: legislator communication, representation, and democratic accountability. Princeton University Press. Heitshusen, V., Young, G., & Wood, D. M. (2005). Electoral context and MP constituency focus in Australia, Canada, Ireland, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. American Journal of Political Science, 49(1), 32-45. Karlsson, C. & T. Persson. (2022). Comparing Oppositional Behavior in European Union Affairs: Empirical Evidence from Six Member States. West European Politics, 45(2), 286-310. Kellermann, M. (2016). Electoral vulnerability, constituency focus, and parliamentary questions in the House of Commons. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 18(1), 90-106. Maricut‐Akbik, A. (2021). Q&A in legislative oversight: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 60(3), 539-559. Martin, S. (2011a). Parliamentary Questions, the Behavior of Legislators, and the. Function of Legislatures: An Introduction. The Journal of Legislative Studies 17 (3), 259-270. Martin, S. (2011b). Using parliamentary questions to measure constituency focus: An application to the Irish case. Political studies, 59(2), 472-488. Martin, S. (2016). Parliamentary Questions and Open Government. In Irène Bouhadana, William Gilles, and Iris Nguyên-Duy eds., Parliaments in the Open Government Era. Paris: IMODEV, 43-67. Martin, S., & Whitaker, R. (2019). Beyond committees: parliamentary oversight of coalition government in Britain. West European Politics, 42(7), 1464-1486. McGowan, A. (2008). Accountability or inability: to what extent does House of Representatives question time deliver executive accountability comparative to other parliamentary chambers? Is there need for reform?. Australasian Parliamentary Review, 23(2), 66-85. Mimica, N., Navia, P., & Cárcamo, I. (2024). Party Affiliation, District-Level Incentives and the Use of Parliamentary Questions in Chile's Presidential Democracy. Government and Opposition, 59(2), 526-542. Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1963). Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review, 57(1), 45-56. Norris, P. (1997). The puzzle of constituency service. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 3(2), 29-49. Otjes, S. & T. Louwerse. (2018). Parliamentary Questions as Strategic Party Tools. West European Politics, 41(2), 496-516. Otjes, S., Nagtzaam, M., & Van Well, R. (2023). Scrutiny and policymaking in local coun cils: how parties use council tools. Local Government Studies, 49(5), 1110-1134. Papp, Z. (2021). Does Issue Alignment Matter? The Electoral Cost and Reward of Agricultural Representation in Urban and Rural Areas. Political Studies Review, 19(3), 376-392. Persson, M. (2015). Education and political participation. British Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 689-703. Proksch, S. O., & Slapin, J. B. (2011). Parliamentary questions and oversight in the European Union. European Journal of Political Research, 50(1), 53-79. Raunio, T. (1996). Parliamentary questions in the European parliament: Representation, information and control. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 2(4), 356-382. Rozenberg, O. & Martin, S. (2011). Questioning Parliamentary Questions. Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 394–404. Russo, F. (2011). The constituency as a focus of representation: Studying the Italian case through the analysis of parliamentary questions. The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 290-301. Russo, F. (2021). Going local: Parliamentary questions as a means of territorial representation in the Italian parliament. Political Studies Review, 19(3), 410-427. Sánchez de Dios, M. & M.Wiberg. (2011). Questioning in European Parliaments.The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17(3), 354-367. Serban, Ruxandra. (2023). The practice of accountability in questioning prime ministers: Comparative evidence from Australia, Canada, Ireland, and the United Kingdom.The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 25(1), 42-63. Soroka, S., Penner, E., & Blidook, K. (2009). Constituency Influence in Parliament. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 563-591. Sozzi, F. (2016). Asking territories: the constituency orientation of Italian and French members of the European Parliament. Italian Political Science Review, 46(2), 199-217. Thomsen, D. M., & Sanders, B. K. (2020). Gender differences in legislator responsiveness. Perspectives on Politics, 18(4), 1017-1030. Tzelgov, E. (2017). Coalition oversight and blame avoidance in Greece. European Political Science Review, 9(1), 95-114. Treul, S., Thomsen, D. M., Volden, C., & Wiseman, A. E. (2022). The primary path for turning legislative effectiveness into electoral success. The Journal of Politics,84(3), 1714-1726. Wegmann, S., & Evequoz, A. (2019). Legislative functions in newly democratised countries: the use of parliamentary questions in Kenya and Zambia. The Journal of legislative studies, 25(4), 443-465. Willumsen, D. M., Stecker, C., & Goetz, K. H. (2018). The electoral connection in staggered parliaments: Evidence from Australia, France, Germany and Japan. European journal of political research, 57(3), 759-780. Willumsen, D. M., & Goetz, K. H. (2019). How does staggered membership renewal affect parliamentary behaviour? Evidence from the French Senate. European Political Science Review, 11(2), 267-284. Willumsen, D. M., Stecker, C., & Goetz, K. H. (2019). Do electoral district size and diversity affect legislative behavior?. Australian Journal of Political Science, 54(1), 37-64. Willumsen, D. M. (2019). So far away from me? The effect of geographical distance on representation. West European Politics, 42(3), 645-669. Zittel, T., Nyhuis, D., & Baumann, M. (2019). Geographic representation in party‐dominated legislatures: A quantitative text analysis of parliamentary questions in the German Bundestag. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 44(4), 681-711. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93537 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 議員的選區關注一直是學者探討議員代表行為的重要領域，其中議員的質詢問題被視作回應選民需求的方式之一（Martin, 2011b；Russo, 2011；Russo, 2021）。因此，本文以兩屆苗栗縣議會（2014~2022）的議員在口頭總質詢提出的選區問題進行個案分析，探討黨派身分、議員個人勝選幅度及選區特性，對議員於質詢中提出選區問題數量及質詢問題類型的影響。
在研究方法上，首先將議員的口頭總質詢內容按語幹區分成不同的質詢問題，再依據Martin（2011b）的編碼規則進行選區問題編碼，後再以Maricut-Akbik（2021）及徐俊明等人（2024）的質詢框架將選區問題分為四類質詢類型，依序為要求資訊、要求解釋、要求改變以及譴責威脅。 研究結果顯示，兩屆議會的議員在提出選區問題的數量和質詢類型方面存在差異。在第十八屆議會中，反對黨議員提出的選區問題數量顯著少於執政黨議員。然而，在第十九屆議會中，並未發現政黨身分對議員提出選區問題的行為有顯著影響，反而是派系在多數模型中對議員的選區關注產生影響。 在勝選幅度方面，統計結果顯示當勝選幅度超過某個閾值時，第十八屆議員提出的要求解釋選區問題以及第十九屆議員提出的要求改變選區問題會隨之增加。另外，納入連任議員的統計分析結果顯示，當議員的勝選幅度較前一屆提高時，議員會提出更多有關選區的問題，展現其對選區的關注。 最後，在選區特性方面，兩屆議會的研究結果均顯示，來自鄉村選區的議員或議員的選區農業人口占比越高時，議員提出的選區問題數量和要求解釋及要求改變的選區質詢問題也會增加。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Councilors’ constituency focus has been an important area of scholarly exploration regarding their representative behavior. Among these behaviors, councilors’ parliamentary questions are seen as a way to respond to constituents' needs (Martin, 2011b; Russo, 2011; Russo, 2021). Therefore, this study conducts a case analysis of constituency questions raised during oral questions by Miaoli County councilors over two terms (2014-2022). It examines how political parties and factions, reelection magnitude, and constituency characteristics influence the number and types of constituency questions.
In terms of research methodology, the content of oral questions was first divided into different questions based on their stems. Then, following Martin (2011b) coding rules, the questions were coded as constituency questions. Next, using the question framework of Maricut-Akbik (2021) and Chun-Ming Tsui et al. (2024), the constituency questions were categorized into four types: requesting information, requesting explanations, requesting changes, and condemning threats. The results show differences in the number and types of constituency questions raised by councilors over the two council terms. In the 18th council, opposition party councilors asked significantly fewer constituency questions than ruling party councilors. However, in the 19th council, parties did not significantly influence the behavior of councilors in raising constituency questions. Instead, factions influenced constituency focus in most models. Regarding reelection magnitude, the statistical results show that when the reelection magnitude exceeds a certain threshold, the number of constituency questions requesting explanations by the 18th councilors and questions requesting changes by the 19th councilors increases. Additionally, the statistical analysis that includes reelected councilors shows that when a councilor's reelection magnitude improves compared to the previous term, they tend to raise more constituency questions, demonstrating their increased focus on constituency concerns. Finally, regarding constituency characteristics, the results for both councils indicated that councilors from rural constituencies or constituencies with a higher proportion of agricultural populations asked more constituency questions and made more requests for explanations and changes. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-08-05T16:25:38Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-08-05T16:25:38Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
誌謝 ii 中文摘要 iii 英文摘要 iv 目 次 vi 圖 次 viii 表 次 ix 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 3 第二章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 選區重要性：從選區研究了解議員代表行為 5 第二節 選區研究之回顧 7 第三節 議員質詢的重要性、分類與特性 9 第四節 黨派、勝選幅度和選區特性與議員質詢問題的關係 10 第五節 黨派、勝選幅度和選區特性與議員質詢選區問題的關係 11 第三章 苗栗縣選區特色及政治脈絡概況 18 第一節 苗栗縣人文地理風貌概述 18 第二節 苗栗縣政治脈絡 19 第三節 第十八屆及第十九屆苗栗縣議會概況 20 第四節 苗栗縣各選區席次概況及選區特色 22 第四章 研究流程及研究方法 28 第一節 研究設計 28 第二節 分析單位 31 第三節 變數介紹及編碼規則 32 第四節 資料蒐集與彙整 43 第五章 研究結果 44 第一節 敘述性統計結果 44 第二節 迴歸分析 61 第三節 綜合討論 72 第六章 結論 76 參考文獻 79 附錄一 第十八屆苗栗縣議員個人資料 86 附錄二 第十九屆苗栗縣議員個人資料 88 附錄三 第十九屆議會第七和第八會期缺席議員的選區問題概況 90 附錄四 兩屆期相關度比對 92 附錄五 納入選區性質之迴歸分析結果 93 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 議員口頭質詢 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 選區關注 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 黨派關係 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 勝選幅度 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 選區特性 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Reelection magnitude | en |
| dc.subject | Councilors’ oral questions | en |
| dc.subject | Constituency focus | en |
| dc.subject | Political parties and factions | en |
| dc.subject | Constituency characteristics | en |
| dc.title | 黨派、勝選幅度和選區特性對議員關注選區問題的影響：以苗栗縣議會為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Impact of Political Parties and Factions, Reelection Magnitude, and Constituency Characteristics on Counci-lors’ Focus to Constituency Issues: A Case Study of the Miaoli County Council | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅清俊;陳光輝 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ching-Jyuhn Luor;Kuang-Hui Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 議員口頭質詢,選區關注,黨派關係,勝選幅度,選區特性, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Councilors’ oral questions,Constituency focus,Political parties and factions,Reelection magnitude,Constituency characteristics, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 94 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402793 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-08-02 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共事務研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 2.46 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。