請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93364完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 郭銘峰 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Ming-Feng Kuo | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 肖潤琦 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Run-Qi Xiao | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-30T16:08:50Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-31 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-30 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-24 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 一、中文部分
丁太平、郭銘峰，2017，〈兩岸民眾環保事件參與之比較：治理結構、風險認知、與行動〉，臺北：2017年台灣政治學會年會「民主成長與民主赤字：台灣解嚴三十年的省思」國際學術研討會。 丁太平、郭銘峰、蔣林秀，2017，〈風險認知與鄰避行動：中國環境治理脈絡下的民眾環保維權行為類型與邏輯〉，上海：第十三屆「兩岸四地公共管理學術研討會」。 王曉楠、曾憲揚，2021，〈感知、意向與行動：城市居民垃圾分類行為的影響路徑〉，《南京工業大學學報（社會科學版）》，20(02)，49-64+111-112。 朱寧、秦富，2023，〈農村居民生活垃圾分類意願與行為的悖離研究——基於CLES的2420個農戶調查數據〉，《農村經濟》，05，89-95。 吳嘉苓，2015，〈訪談法〉，《社會及行為科學研究法：質性研究法》，臺北：東華書局。 吳鴻昌，2014，〈經濟學帝國主義抑或行動理論的重建：對社會學理性選擇理論的反思〉，《政治與社會哲學評論》，49，109-157。 宋成校、朱紅根、張利民，2023，〈農村居民生活垃圾分類行為與意願悖離研究——基於制度約束與社會規範的視角〉，《乾旱區資源與環境》，37(06)，73-80。 李世美、沈麗，2018，〈居住證制度與戶籍制度改革：北京、上海、深圳的政策解讀與對比〉，《山東農業大學學報（社會科學版）》，20(01)，66-74+7。 李麗梅、陳映芳、李思名，2015，〈中國城市戶口和居住證制度下的公民身分等級分層〉，《南京社會科學》，2015(02)，52–60。 周亞雄、張蕊，2020，〈公眾參與環境保護的機制與效應——基於中國CGSS的經驗觀察〉，《環境經濟研究》，5(3)，76-97。 林秀雲譯，2019，《社會科學硏究方法》，臺北：新加坡商聖智學習亞洲私人有限公司台灣分公司。 邱浩政，2018，《量化研究方法一：研究設計與資料分析》，臺北：雙葉書廊。 洪大用、範葉超、肖晨陽，2014，〈檢驗環境關心量表的中國版（CNEP）——基於CGSS2010數據的再分析〉，《社會學研究》，29(04)，49-72+243。 孫煜璨、張濤、張冰、陳坦、楊婷，2023，〈全國範圍的居民生活垃圾分類參與意願分析〉，《四川環境》，42(01)，151-162。 秦鵬，2012，〈環境公民身分：形成邏輯、理論意藴與法治價值〉，《法學評論》，30(03)，78–88。 常鑫、殷紅海，2003，〈Daniel Kahneman與行為經濟學〉，《心理科學進展》，03，256-261。 張美惠譯，2014，《推出你的影響力：每個人都可以影響別人、改善決策,做人生的選擇設計師》，臺北：時報文化。 張紹勳，2016，《Stata與高等統計分析》，臺北：五南。 張莉萍、張中華，2016，〈城市生活垃圾源頭分類中居民集體行動的困境及克服〉，《武漢大學學報（哲學社會科學版）》，69(06)，50-56。 張蓓佳，2021，〈懲罰機制下城市居民垃圾投放行為策略研究〉，《經濟與管理》，35(04)，47-55。 張鑫，2022，《信息激勵對居民垃圾分類行為影響機理及政策仿真研究》，徐州：中國礦業大學碩士學位論文。 許明明、余成龍、姜建芳、馮肖嘉文、白凱文、李蒴、趙文吉、侯麗麗，2022，〈建築垃圾填埋場周邊地下水化學組分來源解析〉，《地質通報》，41(12)，2125-2137。 郭施宏、陸健，2020，〈城市環境治理共治機制構建——以垃圾分類為例〉，《中國特色社會主義研究》，2(5/6)，132。 郭德賓，2004，〈不同類型社區居民資源回收行為意圖之研究〉，《環境與管理研究》，5(1)，19-39。 閆國東、康建成、謝小進、王國棟、張建平、朱文武，2010，〈中國公眾環境意識的變化趨勢〉，《中國人口·資源與環境》，20(10)，55-60。 陳宇、孫梟坤，2023，〈居民生活垃圾分類中的行為與意願：影響因素與悖離邏輯〉，《湖北社會科學》，02，48-58。 陳安、陳晶睿、崔晶、範超、韓瑋，2019，〈中國31個直轄市和省會（首府）城市“垃圾圍城”風險與對策研究——基於DIIS方法的實證研究〉，《中國科學院院刊》，34(07)，797-806。 陳佳昆、喬俊飛、湯健、夏恒，2023，〈城市固廢爐排爐焚燒過程二惡英排放濃度數值仿真〉，《化工進展》，42(2)，1061。 陳春敏、陳振宇，2015，〈實驗研究法〉，《社會及行為科學研究法：總論與量化研究法》，臺北：東華書局。 陳紹軍、李如春、馬永斌，2015，〈意願與行為的悖離：城市居民生活垃圾分類機制研究〉，《中國人口·資源與環境》，25(09)，168–176。 陳雅芝、羅丹、黎江平，2022，〈“目標—工具”適配視角下生活垃圾分類政策量化研究——以46個重點城市為例〉，《生態經濟》，38(10)，198-205。 陸健，2019，〈從自願到強制：中國垃圾分類政策的回顧與反思〉，《世界環境》，180(5)，16-17。 馮曉英，2005，〈城市人口規模調控政策的回顧與反思——以北京市為例〉，《人口研究》，2005(05)，40-47。 黃湛冰、劉磊，2020，〈輕推式干預未被中國廣泛運用的原因：行為經濟學分析〉，《公共管理與政策評論》，9(02)，55-68。 萬筠、王佃利，2020，〈中國城市生活垃圾管理政策變遷中的政策表達和演進邏輯——基於1986—2018年169份政策文本的實證分析〉，《行政論壇》，27(2)，75-84。 葉林、杜聯繁、郭怡武，2021，〈城市居民生活垃圾分類政策何以從引導轉向強制？——基於政策工具的視角〉，《天津行政學院學報》，23(01)，33-45。 董全瑞、張健，2017，〈諾思理論框架下中國戶籍制度變遷及前景預測〉，《社會科學動態》，2017(07)，45-49。 潘淑滿，2022，《質性研究：理論與應用（二版）》，新北：心理出版社。 賴怡樺，2021，《行為經濟學觀點的政策分析與工具設計－以我國文憑主義為個案之探究》，臺北：國立政治大學博士學位論文。 賴怡樺、林水波、陳敦源，2018，〈行為主義導向的公共政策研究：以政策工具「推力」為核心的初探〉，《行政暨政策學報》，67，1-37。 謝敏怡譯，2019，《有限理性：行為經濟學入門首選！經濟學和心理學的共舞,理解人類真實行為的最佳工具》，臺北：大牌出版。 龔平邦，1983，《行為科學槪論》，臺北：三民書局。 二、英文部分 Abdelshiheed, M., Moulder, R., Hostetter, J. W., Barnes, T., & Chi, M. (2024). Example, nudge, or practice? Assessing metacognitive knowledge transfer of factual and procedural learners. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. Ajzen, I. (1985). From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In J. Kuhl & J. Beckmann (Eds.), Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior (pp. 11–39). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683. Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a Theory of Planned Behavior Questionnaire (p. 12). Alan, I., & Brian, W. (1996). Misunderstanding Science?: The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge University Press. Amegah, A. K., Jaakkola, J. J., Quansah, R., Norgbe, G. K., & Dzodzomenyo, M. (2012). Cooking fuel choices and garbage burning practices as determinants of birth weight: A cross-sectional study in Accra, Ghana. Environmental Health, 11(1), 78. Aruta, J. J. B. R. (2022). An extension of the theory of planned behaviour in predicting intention to reduce plastic use in the Philippines: Cross-sectional and experimental evidence. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 25(3), 406–420. Babaei, A. A., Alavi, N., Goudarzi, G., Teymouri, P., Ahmadi, K., & Rafiee, M. (2015). Household recycling knowledge, attitudes and practices towards solid waste management. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 102, 94–100. Babbie, E. R. (2004). The practice of social research. (10th ed.). Thomson/Wadsworth. Bamberg, S., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for University routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behavior, 35(2), 264–285. Bartelings, H., & Sterner, T. (1999). Household Waste Management in a Swedish Municipality: Determinants of Waste Disposal, Recycling and Composting. Environmental and Resource Economics, 13(4), 473–491. Bhargava, S., & Loewenstein, G. (2015). Behavioral Economics and Public Policy 102: Beyond Nudging. The American Economic Review, 105(5), 396–401. Blake, J. (1999). Overcoming the “value-action gap” in environmental policy: Tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment, 4(3), 257–278. Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Burroughs, H. (2012). Seeking better health care outcomes: The ethics of using the “nudge.” American Journal of Bioethics, 12(2), 1–10. Boonrod, K., Towprayoon, S., Bonnet, S., & Tripetchkul, S. (2015). Enhancing organic waste separation at the source behavior: A case study of the application of motivation mechanisms in communities in Thailand. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 95, 77–90. Bowman, N., Goodwin, J., Jones, P., & Weaver, N. (1998). Sustaining recycling: Identification and application of limiting factors in kerbside recycling areas. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 5(4), 263–276. Capraro, V., Jagfeld, G., Klein, R., Mul, M., & de Pol, I. van. (2019). Increasing altruistic and cooperative behaviour with simple moral nudges. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 11880. Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: Towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158. Cartwright, Edward. (2011). Behavioral economics. New York: Routledge. Ceschi, A., Sartori, R., Dickert, S., Scalco, A., Tur, E. M., Tommasi, F., & Delfini, K. (2021). Testing a norm-based policy for waste management: An agent-based modeling simulation on nudging recycling behavior. Journal of Environmental Management, 294, 112938. Chen, S., Huang, J., Xiao, T., Gao, J., Bai, J., Luo, W., & Dong, B. (2020). Carbon emissions under different domestic waste treatment modes induced by garbage classification: Case study in pilot communities in Shanghai, China. Science of The Total Environment, 717, 137193. Chen, Z., Yang, J., Chen, L., & Jiao, H. (2022). Garbage classification system based on improved ShuffleNet v2. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 178, 106090. Cheng, Y.-H., & Liu, K.-C. (2012). Evaluating bicycle-transit users’ perceptions of intermodal inconvenience. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(10), 1690–1706. Chiemchaisri, C., Juanga, J. P., & Visvanathan, C. (2007). Municipal solid waste management in Thailand and disposal emission inventory. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 135(1), 13–20. Cialdini, R. B., Kallgren, C. A., & Reno, R. R. (1991). A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct: A Theoretical Refinement and Reevaluation of the Role of Norms in Human Behavior (M. P. Zanna, Ed.; Vol. 24, pp. 201–234). Academic Press. Coelho, F., Pereira, M. C., Cruz, L., Simões, P., & Barata, E. (2017). Affect and the adoption of pro-environmental behaviour: A structural model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 127–138. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings / Thomas D. Cook, Donald T. Campbell. In Quasi-experimentation: Design & analysis issues for field settings. Houghton Mifflin. Cornes, 1946-, Richard. (1986). The theory of externalities, public goods, and club goods. Cambridge University Press. Czajkowski, M., Zagórska, K., & Hanley, N. (2019). Social norm nudging and preferences for household recycling. Resource and Energy Economics, 58, 101110. Demsetz, H. (2000). Toward a Theory of Property Rights. In C. Gopalakrishnan (Ed.), Classic Papers in Natural Resource Economics (pp. 163–177). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Detenber, B. H. (2021). Nudging in Singapore: Current Implementation in Three Key Areas. Journal of Asian Economic Integration, 3(1), 74–92. Dobson, A. (2011). Sustainability citizenship. Green House Weymouth, UK. Dobson, A., & Bell, D. (2006). Environmental Citizenship. The MIT Press. Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., Metcalfe, R., & Vlaev, I. (2012). Influencing behaviour: The mindspace way. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33(1), 264–277. Dorigoni, A., & Bonini, N. (2023). Water bottles or tap water? A descriptive-social-norm based intervention to increase a pro-environmental behavior in a restaurant. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 86, 101971. Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: Conceptual and measurement issues (Vol. 6). Sage Publications, Westport, CT, Greenwood. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring endorsement of the new ecological paradigm: A revised NEP scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. Dunn, O. J. (1964). Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums. Technometrics, 6(3), 241–252. D’agostino, A. B. R. B. & Ralph B. D’agostino Jr. (1990). A Suggestion for Using Powerful and Informative Tests of Normality. The American Statistician, 44(4), 316–321. Ebert, P., & Freibichler, W. (2017). Nudge management: Applying behavioural science to increase knowledge worker productivity. Journal of Organization Design, 6(1), 4. Echegaray, F., & Hansstein, F. V. (2017). Assessing the intention-behavior gap in electronic waste recycling: The case of Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 180–190. Ferrara, I., & Missios, P. (2012). A Cross-Country Study of Household Waste Prevention and Recycling: Assessing the Effectiveness of Policy Instruments. Land Economics, 88(4), 710–744. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behaviour: An introduction to theory and research (Vol. 27). Fisher, B. (2010). Richard H. Thaler and Cass R. Sunstein: Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Environmental & Resource Economics, 47(1), 149–150. Fisher, R. A. (1922). On the Interpretation of χ2 from Contingency Tables, and the Calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 85(1), 87–94. Foster, B., Muhammad, Z., Yusliza, M. Y., Faezah, J. N., Johansyah, M. D., Yong, J. Y., ul-Haque, A., Saputra, J., Ramayah, T., & Fawehinmi, O. (2022). Determinants of Pro-Environmental Behaviour in the Workplace. Sustainability, 14(8). Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (1996). Environmental problems and human behavior. (pp. xiv, 369). Allyn & Bacon. Gifford, R. (2011). The Dragons of Inaction: Psychological Barriers That Limit Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. American Psychologist, 66(4), 290–302. Gifford, R. D., & Chen, A. K. S. (2017). Why aren’t we taking action? Psychological barriers to climate-positive food choices. Climatic Change, 140(2), 165–178. Gneezy, U., & Rustichini, A. (2000). A Fine Is a Price. The Journal of Legal Studies, 29(1), 1–17. Gould, R. K., Ardoin, N. M., Biggar, M., Cravens, A. E., & Wojcik, D. (2016). Environmental Behavior’s Dirty Secret: The Prevalence of Waste Management in Discussions of Environmental Concern and Action. Environmental Management, 58(2), 268–282. Grazhdani, D. (2016). Assessing the variables affecting on the rate of solid waste generation and recycling: An empirical analysis in Prespa Park. Waste Management, 48, 3–13. Guagnano, G. A., Stern, P. C., & Dietz, T. (1995). Influences on Attitude-Behavior Relationships: A Natural Experiment with Curbside Recycling. Environment and Behavior, 27(5), 699–718. Gundupalli, S. P., Hait, S., & Thakur, A. (2017). A review on automated sorting of source-separated municipal solid waste for recycling. Waste Management, 60, 56–74. Guo, Z., & Wilson, N. H. M. (2011). Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: A case study of the London Underground. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(2), 91–104. Gupta, T., Joshi, R., Mukhopadhyay, D., Sachdeva, K., Jain, N., Virmani, D., & Garcia-Hernandez, L. (2022). A deep learning approach based hardware solution to categorise garbage in environment. Complex & Intelligent Systems, 8(2), 1129–1152. Hagle, T. M., & Mitchell, G. E. (1992). Goodness-of-Fit Measures for Probit and Logit. American Journal of Political Science, 36(3), 762–784. Halvorsen, B. (2008). Effects of norms and opportunity cost of time on household recycling. Land Economics, 84(3), 501–516. Harland, P., Staats, H., & Wilke, H. A. M. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), 2505–2528. Hauslbauer, A. L., Schade, J., Drexler, C. E., & Petzoldt, T. (2022). Extending the theory of planned behavior to predict and nudge toward the subscription to a public transport ticket. European Transport Research Review, 14(1), 5. Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge*. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 123–136. Hawthorne, M., & Alabaster, T. (1999). Citizen 2000: Development of a model of environmental citizenship. Global Environmental Change, 9(1), 25–43. Hayes, R.J., & Moulton, L.H. (2009). Cluster Randomised Trials (1st ed.). Chapman and Hall/CRC. Heimlich, J. E., & Ardoin, N. M. (2008). Understanding behavior to understand behavior change: A literature review. Environmental Education Research, 14(3), 215–237. Hicks, C., Dietmar, R., & Eugster, M. (2005). The recycling and disposal of electrical and electronic waste in China—Legislative and market responses. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(5), 459–471. Hollands, G. J., Shemilt, I., Marteau, T. M., Jebb, S. A., Kelly, M. P., Nakamura, R., Suhrcke, M., & Ogilvie, D. (2013). Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: Towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health, 13(1), 1218. Hong, S. (1999). The effects of unit pricing system upon household solid waste management: The Korean experience. Journal of Environmental Management, 57(1), 1–10. Howlett, M. (2019). Designing public policies: Principles and instruments (Second edition.). Routledge. Husaini, I. G., Garg, A., Kim, K. H., Marchant, J., Pollard, S. J. T., & Smith, R. (2007). European household waste management schemes: Their effectiveness and applicability in England. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 51(1), 248–263. Ishikawa, M. (2001). Optimum cost sharing of sorted waste collection between households and local authority considering consumer inconvenience: Rational basis of shared responsibility. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 4(4), 235–251. John, P., Cotterill, S., Moseley, A., Richardson, L., Smith, G., Stoker, G., & Wales, C. (2020). Nudge, nudge, think, think (second edition): Experimenting with ways to change citizen behaviour. Kahneman, D. (2003). Maps of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449–1475. Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Allen Lane. Kaiser, F. G., & Gutscher, H. (2003). The proposition of a general version of the theory of planned behavior: Predicting ecological behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(3), 586–603. Kaiser, F. G., Wölfing, S., & Fuhrer, U. (1999). Environmental attitude and ecological behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(1), 1–19. Kang, J. E., & Recker, W. W. (2009). An activity-based assessment of the potential impacts of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles on energy and emissions using 1-day travel data. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 14(8), 541–556. Kinnaman, T. C., & Fullerton, D. (2000). Garbage and Recycling with Endogenous Local Policy. Journal of Urban Economics, 48(3), 419–442. Kirakozian, A. (2016). One without the other? Behavioural and incentive policies for household waste management. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 526–551. Kirakozian, A. (2016). The determinants of household recycling: Social influence, public policies and environmental preferences. Applied Economics, 48(16), 1481–1503. Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260. Kolstad, C. D. (2000). Environmental economics. Oxford University Press. Kormos, C., & Gifford, R. (2014). The validity of self-report measures of proenvironmental behavior: Ameta-analytic review. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 359–371. Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583–621. Kuehnhanss, C. R. (2019). The challenges of behavioural insights for effective policy design. Policy and Society, 38(1), 14–40. Langenbach, B. P., Berger, S., Baumgartner, T., & Knoch, D. (2020). Cognitive Resources Moderate the Relationship Between Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Green Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 52(9), 979–995. Lee, M., Choi, H., & Koo, Y. (2017). Inconvenience cost of waste disposal behavior in South Korea. Ecological Economics, 140, 58–65. Lee, Y., Kim, S., Kim, M., & Choi, J. (2014). Antecedents and interrelationships of three types of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 67(10), 2097–2105. Li, X., Bi, F., Han, Z., Qin, Y., Wang, H., & Wu, W. (2019). Garbage source classification performance, impact factor, and management strategy in rural areas of China: A case study in Hangzhou. Waste Management, 89, 313–321. Liang, Y., Li, Z., Feng, S., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Can we ‘Nudge’ people to better waste separation behaviours? Policy interventions mediated by habit, sense of separation efficiency and external environmental perceptions. Waste Management and Research: the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA, 734242X231187579. Advance online publication. Liu Changli, Zhang Feng-E, Zhang Yun, Song Shuhong, Zhang Sheng, Hao, Y., Hongbing, H., Lijuan, Y., & Ming, Z. (2005). Experimental and numerical study of pollution process in an aquifer in relation to a garbage dump field. Environmental Geology, 48(8), 1107–1115. Liu, X., Wang, Z., Li, W., Li, G., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Mechanisms of public education influencing waste classification willingness of urban residents. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 149, 381–390. Lizin, S., Van Dael, M., & Van Passel, S. (2017). Battery pack recycling: Behaviour change interventions derived from an integrative theory of planned behaviour study. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 122, 66–82. Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S., & Whitmarsh, L. (2007). Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change, 17(3), 445–459. Lu, H., & Sidortsov, R. (2019). Sorting out a problem: A co-production approach to household waste management in Shanghai, China. Waste Management, 95, 271–277. Ly, K., Mazar, N., Zhao, M., & Soman, D. (2013). A practitioner’s guide to nudging. Rotman School of Management, University of Toronto. Ma, Q., Huang, D., Li, H., Hu, Y., P. Paudel, K., Zhang, S., & Zhang, J. (2021). Effects of Fiscal Decentralization on Garbage Classifications. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 686561. Ma, W., & Zhu, Z. (2021). Internet use and willingness to participate in garbage classification: An investigation of Chinese residents. Applied Economics Letters, 28(9), 788–793. MacBride, Samantha. (2012). Recycling reconsidered: The present failure and future promise of environmental action in the United States / Samantha MacBride. In Recycling reconsidered: The present failure and future promise of environmental action in the United States. MIT Press. Mannetti, L., Pierro, A., & Livi, S. (2004). Recycling: Planned and self-expressive behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(2), 227–236. Martinus, A., & Klitzner, K. (2023). Behavioral Insights in South Africa—A View from the Global South, Learning, Growing, and Evolving. In M. Sanders, S. Bhanot, & S. O’ Flaherty (Eds.), Behavioral Public Policy in a Global Context: Practical Lessons from Outside the Nudge Unit (pp. 191–203). Springer International Publishing. Matsumoto, S. (2014). The Opportunity Cost of Pro-Environmental Activities: Spending Time to Promote the Environment. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 35(1), 119–130. Meng, X., Tan, X., Wang, Y., Wen, Z., Tao, Y., & Qian, Y. (2019). Investigation on decision-making mechanism of residents’ household solid waste classification and recycling behaviors. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 140, 224–234. Messick, D. M., & Brewer, M. B. (2005). Solving social dilemmas: A review. (p. 131). Edward Elgar Publishing. Milfont, T. L. (2009). The effects of social desirability on self-reported environmental attitudes and ecological behaviour. Environmentalist, 29(3), 263–269. Milford, A. B., Øvrum, A., & Helgesen, H. (2015). Nudges to increase recycling and reduce waste. Momsen, K., & Stoerk, T. (2014). From intention to action: Can nudges help consumers to choose renewable energy? Energy Policy, 74, 376–382. Murayama, H., Takagi, Y., Tsuda, H., & Kato, Y. (2023). Applying Nudge to Public Health Policy: Practical Examples and Tips for Designing Nudge Interventions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(5). Murayama, H., Takagi, Y., Tsuda, H., & Kato, Y. (2023). Applying Nudge to Public Health Policy: Practical Examples and Tips for Designing Nudge Interventions. International journal of environmental research and public health, 20(5), 3962. Nduneseokwu, C. K., Qu, Y., & Appolloni, A. (2017). Factors influencing consumers’ intentions to participate in a formal e-waste collection system: A case study of Onitsha, Nigeria. Sustainability (Switzerland), 9(6), 881. Nie, Y., Wu, Y., Zhao, J., Zhao, J., Chen, X., Maraseni, T., & Qian, G. (2018). Is the finer the better for municipal solid waste (MSW) classification in view of recyclable constituents? A comprehensive social, economic and environmental analysis. Waste Management, 79, 472–480. Nomura, H., John, P. C., & Cotterill, S. (2011). The use of feedback to enhance environmental outcomes: A randomised controlled trial of a food waste scheme. Local Environment, 16(7), 637–653. Nordic Council of Ministers. (2016). Nudging and pro-environmental behaviour. Nordic Council of Ministers. Norman, P., & Hoyle, S. (2004). The Theory of Planned Behavior and Breast Self-Examination: Distinguishing Between Perceived Control and Self-Efficacy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), 694–708. Oates, W. E., & Portney, P. R. (2003). Chapter 8—The Political Economy of Environmental Policy. In K.-G. Mäler & J. R. Vincent (Eds.). Environmental Degradation and Institutional Responses , 1, 325–354. Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L., & O’Neill, S. (2009). Reorienting Climate Change Communication for Effective Mitigation: Forcing People to be Green or Fostering Grass-Roots Engagement? Science Communication, 30(3), 305–327. Oliver, A. (2017). The Origins of Behavioural Public Policy. Cambridge University Press. Olson, Mancur. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups / [by] Mancur Olson, Jr. In The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press. Olsson, L. E., Friman, M., Kawabata, Y., & Fujii, S. (2021). Integrating Planned Behavior and Stage-of-Change into a Cycling Campaign. Sustainability, 13(18). Osgood, C. E., Suci, G. J., & Tannenbaum, P. H. (1957). The measurement of meaning. In The measurement of meaning. University of Illinois Press. Ozili, Peterson K (2023). The acceptable R-square in empirical modelling for social science research. Forthcoming in. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/116496/ O’Donoghue, T., & Rabin, M. (1999). Doing It Now or Later. American Economic Review, 89(1), 103–124. Pallett, H. (2017). Environmental citizenship. Park, J., & Ha, S. (2014). Understanding Consumer Recycling Behavior: Combining the Theory of Planned Behavior and the Norm Activation Model. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 42(3), 278–291. Patton, M. Quinn. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods(3rd ed.). Sage Publications. Phulwani, P. R., Kumar, D., & Goyal, P. (2020). A Systematic Literature Review and Bibliometric Analysis of Recycling Behavior. Journal of Global Marketing, 33(5), 354–376. Pickin, J. (2008). Unit pricing of household garbage in Melbourne: Improving welfare, reducing garbage, or neither? Waste Management & Research, 26(6), 508–514. Pizarro-Alonso, A., Cimpan, C., Söderman, M. L., Ravn, H., & Münster, M. (2018). The economic value of imports of combustible waste in systems with high shares of district heating and variable renewable energy. Waste Management, 79, 324–338. Pligt, J. van der. (2001). Decision Making, Psychology of. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 3309–3315). Prime Minister’s Strategy Unit. (2002). Public Attitudes Towards Recycling and Waste Management. Ramayah, T., Lee, J. W. C., & Lim, S. (2012). Sustaining the environment through recycling: An empirical study. Journal of Environmental Management, 102, 141–147. Rani, A., Negi, S., Hussain, A., & Kumar, S. (2020). Treatment of urban municipal landfill leachate utilizing garbage enzyme. Bioresource Technology, 297, 122437. Reddi, K. R., Li, W., Wang, B., & Moon, Y. (2013). System dynamics modelling of hybrid renewable energy systems and combined heating and power generator. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 6(1), 31–47. Rosenthal S., Linder N. (2019). Effects of convenience and procedural prompts to increase the use of recycling bins and reduce the contamination of recyclables: Evidence from a laboratory experiment in Singapore (Unpublished Manuscript). Royston, P. (1991). sg3.5: Comment on sg3.4 and an improved D’Agostino test. Stata Technical Bulletin 3: 23–24. Reprinted in Stata Technical Bulletin Reprints, vol. 1, pp. 110–112. College Station, TX: Stata Press. Saeed, M. O., Hassan, M. N., & Mujeebu, M. A. (2009). Assessment of municipal solid waste generation and recyclable materials potential in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Waste Management, 29(7), 2209–2213. Saikawa, E., Wu, Q., Zhong, M., Avramov, A., Ram, K., Stone, E. A., Stockwell, C. E., Jayarathne, T., Panday, A. K., & Yokelson, R. J. (2020). Garbage Burning in South Asia: How Important Is It to Regional Air Quality? Environmental Science & Technology, 54(16), 9928–9938. Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press. Salisbury, R. H. (1969). An Exchange Theory of Interest Groups. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(1), 1–32. Samuels, R., & Stich, S. (2001). Irrationality: Philosophical Aspects. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 7906–7910). Samuelson, W., & Zeckhauser, R. (1988). Status quo bias in decision making. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1(1), 7–59. Sandler, Todd. (1992). Collective action: Theory and applications. Harvester Wheatsheaf*. Schultz, P. W. (1999). Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21(1), 25–36. Shen, L., Si, H., Yu, L., & Si, H. (2019). Factors Influencing Young People’s Intention toward Municipal Solid Waste Sorting. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(10), 1708. Siegel, S., & Castellan Jr., N. J. (1988). Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. (pp. xxiii, 399). Mcgraw-Hill Book Company. Simon, H. A. (1979). Information Processing Models of Cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 30(1), 363–396. Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. In Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. Stern, P. C. (2011). Contributions of psychology to limiting climate change. American Psychologist, 66, 303–314. Sunstein, C. R. (2017). Default Rules Are Better Than Active Choosing (Often). Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 600–606. Sunstein, C. R. (2020). Behavioral science and public policy. Cambridge University Press. Sunstein, C. R. (Ed.). (2016). Mandates. In The Ethics of Influence: Government in the Age of Behavioral Science (pp. 187–198). Cambridge University Press; Cambridge Core. Sunstein, C. R., Reisch, L. A., & Rauber, J. (2018). A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost. Regulation & Governance, 12(1), 3–22. Tam, K.-P., & Chan, H.-W. (2017). Environmental concern has a weaker association with pro-environmental behavior in some societies than others: A cross-cultural psychology perspective. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 53, 213–223. Tam, K.-P., & Chan, H.-W. (2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48, 182–194. Tanner, C. (1999). Constraints on environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(2), 145–157. Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). WITHDRAWN - Mixed Methods Sampling: A Typology With Examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), NP1–NP1. Teng, Y., Lin, P.-W., Chen, X.-L., & Wang, J.-L. (2022). An analysis of the behavioral decisions of governments, village collectives, and farmers under rural waste sorting. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 95, 106780. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. 93(2), 175–179. Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. (pp. x, 293). Yale University Press. Torgerson, D. J., & Torgerson, C. J. (2008). Cluster Randomised Controlled Trials. In Designing Randomised Trials in Health, Education and the Social Sciences: An Introduction (pp. 99–107). Palgrave Macmillan UK. Tsai, C.-C., Li, X. (Dale), & Wu, W.-N. (2021). Explaining citizens’ pro-environmental behaviours in public and private spheres: The mediating role of willingness to sacrifice for the environment. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 80(3), 510–538. Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124-1131. UN Habitat. (2010). Solid waste management in the world’s cities. UN Innovation Network. (2023). United Nations Behavioural Science Report. Ungar, S. (1994). Apples and oranges: Probing the attitude-behaviour relation. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 31(3), 288–304. Canadian Business & Current Affairs Database; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Political Science Database; Sociological Abstracts. Upton, G. J. G. (1992). Fisher’s Exact Test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (Statistics in Society), 155(3), 395–402. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., Van Knippenberg, A., & Moonen, A. (1998). Habit versus planned behaviour: A field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 111–128. Vogt, W. P., & Johnson, R. B. (2015). The SAGE Dictionary of Statistics and Methodology. SAGE Publications, Incorporated. Wang, C., Chu, Z., & Gu, W. (2021). Participate or not: Impact of information intervention on residents’ willingness of sorting municipal solid waste. Journal of Cleaner Production, 318, 128591. Wang, X., & Tan, J. (2022). The Perception and Attitude of Farmers toward Domestic Waste Classifications: A Case Study on Wusheng County, Sichuan Province, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20), 13499. Wang, Y., Long, X., Li, L., Wang, Q., Ding, X., & Cai, S. (2021). Extending theory of planned behavior in household waste sorting in China: The moderating effect of knowledge, personal involvement, and moral responsibility. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(5), 7230–7250. Wang, Z., Dong, X., & Yin, J. (2018). Antecedents of urban residents’ separate collection intentions for household solid waste and their willingness to pay: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 256–264. Wang, Z., Dong, X., & Yin, J. (2018). Antecedents of urban residents’ separate collection intentions for household solid waste and their willingness to pay: Evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 173, 256–264. Wang, Z., Guo, D., Wang, X., Zhang, B., & Wang, B. (2018). How does information publicity influence residents’ behaviour intentions around e-waste recycling? Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 133, 1–9. Wang, Z., Zhang, B., Yin, J., & Zhang, X. (2011). Willingness and behavior towards e-waste recycling for residents in Beijing city, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(9), 977–984. Wensing, J., Caputo, V., Carraresi, L., & Bröring, S. (2020). The effects of green nudges on consumer valuation of bio-based plastic packaging. Ecological Economics, 178, 106783. Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual Comparisons by Ranking Methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83. Wilson, A. L., Buckley, E., Buckley, J. D., & Bogomolova, S. (2016). Nudging healthier food and beverage choices through salience and priming. Evidence from a systematic review. Food Quality and Preference, 51, 47–64. Wu, S. J., & Paluck, E. L. (2021). Designing nudges for the context: Golden coin decals nudge workplace behavior in China. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 163, 43–50. Xie, X., Gong, X., & Pan, S. (2023). Research on the construction path of the megacity from the perspective of Nudge Theory: Empirical evidence of the “Park City” construction in Chengdu Tianfu New Area. Chinese Journal of Population Resources and Environment, 21(3), 163–171. Xu, L., Ling, M., & Wu, Y. (2018). Economic incentive and social influence to overcome household waste separation dilemma: A field intervention study. Waste Management, 77, 522–531. Xu, L., Ling, M., Lu, Y., & Shen, M. (2017). External influences on forming residents’ waste separation behaviour: Evidence from households in Hangzhou, China. Habitat International, 63, 21–33. Xu, S., Li, G., Ou, H., & Wu, W. (2015). Research and Demonstration of Dynamic Intelligent Logistics System of the Collection and Transportation Process of Giant Municipal Garbage. Proceedings of China Modern Logistics Engineering, 39–50. Yuan, Y., & Yabe, M. (2014). Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Household Kitchen Waste Separation Services in Haidian and Dongcheng Districts, Beijing City. Environments, 1(2), 190–207. Yuan, Y., Li, T., & Zhai, Q. (2020). Life Cycle Impact Assessment of Garbage-Classification Based Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems: A Comparative Case Study in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5310. Zald, M. N., & McCarthy, J. D., (John David). (1987). Social movements in an organizational society: Collected essays / edited by Mayer N. Zald and John D. McCarthy. Transaction Books. Zhang, D., Huang, G., Yin, X., & Gong, Q. (2015). Residents’ Waste Separation Behaviors at the Source: Using SEM with the Theory of Planned Behavior in Guangzhou, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(8), 9475–9491. Zhang, L., Hu, Q., Zhang, S., & Zhang, W. (2020). Understanding Chinese Residents’ Waste Classification from a Perspective of Intention–Behavior Gap. Sustainability, 12(10), 4135. Zhang, L., Liu, G., Li, S., Yang, L., & Chen, S. (2022). Model framework to quantify the effectiveness of garbage classification in reducing dioxin emissions. Science of The Total Environment, 814, 151941. Zhang, Z., & Wang, X. (2020). Nudging to promote household waste source separation: Mechanisms and spillover effects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 162, 105054. Zhao, H., Gao, Q., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., & Zhu, X. (2014). What affects green consumer behavior in China? A case study from Qingdao. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 143–151. Zhao, R., Ren, X., Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Long, R. (2022). Different Educational Interventions on Individual Cognition of Garbage Classification Based on EEG Monitoring. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8567. Ölander, F., & Thøgersen, J. (2014). Informing Versus Nudging in Environmental Policy. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(3), 341–356. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93364 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 永續的廢棄物管理是當前世界範圍內廣泛存在、具有急迫性的公共議題。其中垃圾分類作為實現該目標的基本策略，被大多數國家政府推行。中國大陸的垃圾分類制度實施至今業已二十餘年，本文將之劃分為「試點自願」和「推廣強制」兩個階段，在理論和實務的發展中既有與其他國家之共通性問題也兼有其獨特性問題。一個現實的問題是：具有分類意願的民眾一定會產生實際分類行為嗎？
有鑑於此，本文首先透過文獻回顧釐析中國大陸垃圾分類治理的發展歷程、制度設計，其次以計畫行為理論視角具體討論了民眾的分類行為及意圖-行為差距，隨後結合實務中的問題確定民眾的心裡謬誤，運用行為經濟學的「輕推」策略設計了兩種介入方案，並藉由實地實驗和半結構式深度訪談的研究方法，具體檢驗其對民眾垃圾分類意圖和行為的影響效果，以期探索彌合意圖與行為之間的差距、進一步促進民眾實際參與分類的新途徑。研究結果顯示，計畫行為理論能很好地用於分析垃圾分類行為，且兩種輕推策略與提高分類行為之間不僅存在正相關性更被證明具有因果關係。實施「社會規範輕推」的實驗組後測分類意圖顯著高於前測，表明輕推干預提高了分類意圖，在一個社區中證明了該策略能有效提高民眾分類意圖。實施「程序性資訊輕推」和「社會規範輕推」的四個實驗組後測分類行為均顯著高於前測，且兩個控制組在實驗前後的組內差異均不顯著，可以排除其他因素的干擾，支持了輕推的有效性。 本研究結果初步揭示了輕推策略作為彌合垃圾分類意圖-行為差距有效途徑的可能性，以及作為進一步提升民眾垃圾分類參與的新路徑和有益補充的可能性，為政府決策者在傳統的管制、獎勵等模式之外初步探索了一條新的、來自心理層面的路徑，有助於實現垃圾分類治理的再進步。最後基於以上結果提出了更加重視輕推政策工具並積極將其與傳統政策工具結合使用的政策建議。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Sustainable waste management is a widespread and urgent public issue globally. Garbage sorting, as a fundamental strategy to achieve this goal, has been implemented by governments in most countries. The waste sorting system in mainland China has been in place for over twenty years, and this thesis divides its development into two phases. The development of waste sorting in China presents both commonalities with other countries and unique issues. A practical question arises: Do individuals with the willingness to sort waste necessarily engage in actual sorting behavior?
In light of this, this thesis first reviews the development process and institutional design of waste sorting governance in mainland China through a literature review. Secondly, from the perspective of the Theory of Planned Behavior, it discusses the gap between people's intention to sort and their actual sorting behavior. Subsequently, it identifies the psychological biases of the public in practice and designs two intervention schemes using behavioral economics' "nudge" strategies. These schemes are empirically tested through field experiments and semi-structured in-depth interviews to examine their impact on the public's intention and behavior in waste sorting. The aim is to explore new ways to bridge the gap between intention and behavior and further promote actual public participation in sorting. The research results indicate that the Theory of Planned Behavior is effective in analyzing waste sorting behavior. The two nudge strategies not only show a positive correlation with increased sorting behavior but also demonstrate causality. Post-test sorting intentions in the experimental group that implemented the "Norms and Messenger Nudges" were significantly higher than pre-test intentions, indicating that nudge interventions increased sorting intentions. This strategy was proven effective in enhancing public sorting intentions within a community. Post-test sorting behaviors in the four experimental groups that implemented "Procedural Prompts Nudges" and "Norms and Messenger Nudges" were significantly higher than pre-test behaviors. Additionally, the two control groups showed no significant intra-group differences before and after the experiment, excluding other interfering factors and supporting the effectiveness of the nudges. The findings of this study preliminarily reveal the potential of nudge strategies as effective means to bridge the intention-behavior gap in waste sorting and as beneficial supplements and new pathways to further enhance public participation in waste sorting. For policymakers, the study explores a new psychological approach beyond traditional regulation and incentive models, contributing to the advancement of waste sorting governance. Finally, based on these results, this thesis proposes policy recommendations that emphasize the importance of nudge policy tools and actively combine them with traditional policy tools. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-30T16:08:50Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-30T16:08:50Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘 要 i
Abstract ii 目 次 iv 圖 次 vi 表 次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究目的與問題 5 第三節 概念界定 7 第四節 章節安排 8 第二章 理論回顧與文獻檢閱 10 第一節 中國大陸垃圾分類的制度設計與現狀 10 第二節 垃圾分類的行動邏輯 21 第三節 推動垃圾分類的途徑 36 第三章 研究設計 50 第一節 研究架構與待驗假設 50 第二節 研究流程與研究方法 52 第三節 訪談樣本選取與執行步驟 54 第四節 北京市社區垃圾分類輕推實驗的設計 56 第四章 實證發現與討論 74 第一節 實驗分組與樣本回收情況 74 第二節 信度檢定 81 第三節 有效樣本實驗前垃圾分類意圖和行為的差異分析 82 第四節 不同社區實驗樣本各主要變數的分布現況 90 第五節 垃圾分類行為與各因素之相關性分析 101 第六節 輕推策略介入方案的實驗效果與討論 106 第五章 結論與建議 118 第一節 研究結論 118 第二節 理論貢獻及政策意涵 120 第三節 研究限制 122 參考文獻 124 附錄一：實驗問卷設計表及前、後測問卷 147 附錄二：訪談邀請函及大綱 164 附錄三：六組有效樣本之原始人口統計變數表 166 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.subject | 輕推 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 親環境行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 垃圾廢棄物治理 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 北京市 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 實驗法 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Experimental method | en |
| dc.subject | Beijing | en |
| dc.subject | Waste management | en |
| dc.subject | Nudge | en |
| dc.subject | Pro-environmental behaviour | en |
| dc.title | 「輕推」政策工具影響民眾親環境行動之分析： 以社區家戶垃圾分類為例 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | The Effects of “ Nudge ” Policy Tools on Pro-Environmental Behavior: A Study of Household Waste Sorting in Community | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅清俊;吳舜文 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ching-Jyuhn Luor;Shun-Wen Wu | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 親環境行為,輕推,實驗法,北京市,垃圾廢棄物治理, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Pro-environmental behaviour,Nudge,Experimental method,Beijing,Waste management, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 171 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202402026 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-26 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 公共事務研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 公共事務研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 未授權公開取用 | 4.53 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。