Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 財務金融學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93216
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor邱顯比zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShean-Bii Chiuen
dc.contributor.author廖萱昀zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorHsuan-Yun Liaoen
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-23T16:20:22Z-
dc.date.available2024-07-24-
dc.date.copyright2024-07-23-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2024-07-15-
dc.identifier.citation中央銀行,2021,國內ETF大幅成長對金融市場之影響,金融穩定報告第15期,58-60。
王湘羚,2020,台灣得獎基金之未來績效持續性,國立臺灣大學財務金融學研究所碩士論文,台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/2w4h7t
李宗賢,2019,指數股票型基金與主動式基金的差異性對其績效影響之研究,佛光大學應用經濟學系碩士論文,宜蘭縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/hn77bw
林美苓,2017,投資得獎基金的短中長期績效之研究,大葉大學管理學院碩士在職專班碩士論文,彰化縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/x88cf7
陳姵君,2016,得獎基金績效評估與持續性分析,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/9d65z6
陳暐霖,2018,得獎基金的持續性研究-以股票型基金為例,淡江大學財務金融學系碩士班碩士論文,新北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/25vp6v
曾博鈺,2012,台灣得獎基金績效與持續性之評估,國立中正大學財務金融研究所碩士論文,嘉義縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/xzjx9a
曾婷郁,2009,得獎基金績效持續性分析,國立臺灣大學國際企業學研究所碩士論文,台北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/36t2bj
黃國智,2015,主動式基金與被動式基金在市場多空頭時績效的差異性研究,淡江大學國際企業學系碩士在職專班碩士論文,新北市。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/zd9w68
黃裙惠,2015,得獎基金的績效持續性與申購分析,大葉大學管理學院碩士在職專班碩士論文,彰化縣。取自https://hdl.handle.net/11296/b76z3g
Blake, Christopher R, and Matthew R Morey, 2000, Morningstar ratings and mutual fund performance, Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis 35, 451-483.
Del Guercio, Diane, and Paula A Tkac, 2008, Star power: The effect of monrningstar ratings on mutual fund flow, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 43, 907-936.
Elton, Edwin J, Martin J Gruber, and Andre de Souza, 2018, Fund of funds selection of mutual funds, Critical Finance Review 7, 241-272.
Elton, Edwin J, Martin J Gruber, and Andre de Souza, 2019, Are passive funds really superior investments? An investor perspective, Financial Analysts Journal 75, 7-19.
Fahling, Ernst J, Elmar Steurer, and Sven Sauer, 2019, Active vs. Passive funds—an empirical analysis of the german equity market, Journal of Financial Risk Management 8, 73.
Gerrans, Paul, 2006, Morningstar ratings and future performance, Accounting & Finance 46, 605-628.
Khorana, Ajay, and Edward Nelling, 1998, The determinants and predictive ability of mutual fund ratings, The Journal of Investing 7, 61-66.
Kremnitzer, Klemens, 2012, Comparing active and passive fund management in emerging markets, University of California, Berkeley, Economics Department. Senior Honors Thesis.
Loviscek, Anthony L, and W John Jordan, 2000, Stock selection based on morningstar’s ten-year, five-star general equity mutual funds, Financial Services Review 9, 145-157.
Malkiel, Burton G, 2003, The efficient market hypothesis and its critics, Journal of economic perspectives 17, 59-82.
Morey, Matthew R, 2003, Kiss of death: A 5-star morningstar mutual fund rating?, Available at SSRN 455240.
Otero-González, Luis, Paulo Leite, Pablo Durán-Santomil, and Renato Domingues, 2022, Morningstar star ratings and the performance, risk and flows of european bond mutual funds, International Review of Economics & Finance 82, 479-496.
Sawicki, Julia, and Kevin Thomson, 1998, An investigation into the performance of recommended funds: Do the managed funds' approved'by research companies outperform the non gratae?, Available at SSRN 79088.
Sorensen, Eric H, Keith L Miller, and Vele Samak, 1998, Allocating between active and passive management, Financial Analysts Journal 54, 18-31.
Wang, Ya-Hui, and Cing-Fen Tsai, 2014, The relationship between brand image and purchase intention: Evidence from award winning mutual funds, The international journal of business and finance research 8, 27-40.
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/93216-
dc.description.abstract本研究旨在從投資人的角度出發,透過較符合真實世界投資情形的假設與研究方法,觀察2017年10月至2022年9月及2020年10月至2022年9月兩個樣本期間,不同資料期間或類型的台股主動型基金與配對ETF投資組合的未來績效比較,並觀察得獎基金的未來績效是否能更顯著優於配對ETF投資組合。實證結果發現:(1) 與2017年9月之前成立的ETF配對比較未來績效,多數台股主動型基金的未來績效皆顯著優於ETF投資組合;(2) 與2020年9月前成立的ETF配對比較未來績效,在股市大漲期間主動型基金的未來績效顯著優於ETF投資組合,在股市大跌期間主動型基金績效微幅劣於ETF投資組合,其中又以開放式一般型和開放式科技類的主動型基金未來績效更加顯著優於ETF投資組合;(3) Smart智富台灣基金獎和傑出基金金鑽獎的得獎基金名單,皆無法提高挑出未來績效更顯著優於配對ETF投資組合的主動型基金的機率。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this study is to compare the future performance of Taiwan active funds and their matching ETF portfolios during different data periods or types, from the perspective of investors, using assumptions and research methods that are more in line with real-world investment situations. The two sample periods are from October 2017 to September 2022 and from October 2020 to September 2022. Finally, the study examines whether the future performance of award-winning funds is more significantly superior to their matching ETF portfolios. The empirical results show that: (1) Compared with ETFs established before September 2017, the future performance of most Taiwan active funds is significantly superior to their matching ETF portfolios; (2) Compared with ETFs established before September 2020, the future performance of Taiwan active funds is significantly superior to their matching ETF portfolios during periods of stock market surging, but slightly inferior to their matching ETF portfolios during periods of stock market plummeting. Specifically, open-end general and technology type active funds have even more significant future performance over ETF portfolios; (3) The lists of award-winning funds for Morningstar Taiwan Fund Awards and TFF-Bloomberg Best Fund Awards do not raise the probability of selecting Taiwan active funds with future performance that is significantly superior to their matching ETF portfolios.en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-23T16:20:22Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-07-23T16:20:22Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents摘要 i
Abstract ii
目次 iii
圖次 iv
表次 v
第一章 緒論 1
第一節、研究動機 1
第二節、研究目的 2
第二章 文獻回顧 4
第一節、主動投資與被動投資績效比較 4
第二節、主動型基金挑選標準 5
第三章 資料與研究方法 8
第一節、資料來源 8
第二節、變數定義 12
第三節、研究方法 14
第四章 實證結果與分析 18
第一節、集群分析 18
第二節、風險配對ETF投資組合 24
第三節、得獎基金績效比較 35
第五章 結論與建議 39
第一節、研究結論 39
第二節、研究建議 40
參考文獻 42
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject主動型基金zh_TW
dc.subjectETFzh_TW
dc.subject集群分析zh_TW
dc.subject風險配對zh_TW
dc.subject得獎基金zh_TW
dc.subject績效持續性zh_TW
dc.subjectActive Funden
dc.subjectPerformance Persistenceen
dc.subjectAward-Winning Funden
dc.subjectCluster Analysisen
dc.subjectRisk Matchingen
dc.subjectETFen
dc.title台灣主動型基金與被動型ETF績效比較之實證研究zh_TW
dc.titleAn Empirical Study on the Performance Comparison between Taiwan Active Funds and Passive ETFsen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee林姿婷;林修葳zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeTzu-Ting Lin;Hsiou-Wei Linen
dc.subject.keyword主動型基金,ETF,集群分析,風險配對,得獎基金,績效持續性,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordActive Fund,ETF,Risk Matching,Cluster Analysis,Award-Winning Fund,Performance Persistence,en
dc.relation.page43-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202401759-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-07-15-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept財務金融學系-
顯示於系所單位:財務金融學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf819.11 kBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved