請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9301完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 陳右人(Iou-Zen Chen) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Tzu-Hui Lee | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李慈慧 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:16:37Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2009-10-02 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:16:37Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-14 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-06 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 1. Anonymous. 1995. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distincness, uniformity and stability. Strawberry (Fragaria L.). Geneva, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants.
2. Anonymous. 2008. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. Strawberry (Fragaria L.). Geneva, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants. 3. Battey, N. H., P. Le Mière, A. Tehranifar, C. Cekic, S. Taylor, K. J. Shrives, P. Hadley, A. J. Greenland, J. Darby, and M. J. Wilkinson. 1998. Genetic and environmental control of flowering in strawberry, p. 111-131. In: K. E. Cockshull, D. Gray, G. B. Seymour, and B. Thomas (eds.). Genetic and environmental manipulation of horticultural crops. CABI publishing, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. 4. Baur R. 1976. New patterns of heterosis in Fragaria hybrids. Eucarpia 7:63-68. 5. Bors, R. H. and J. A. Sullivan. 1997. Some interesting traits of European and Asian Fragaria species. HortScience 32:439. 6. Bors, R. H. and J. A. Sullivan. 2005a. Interspecific hybridization of Fragaria vesca subspecies with F. nilgerrensis, F. nubicola, F. pentaphylla, and F. viridis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 130:418-423. 7. Bors, R. H. and J. A. Sullivan. 2005b. Interspecific hybridization of Fragaria moschata with two diploid species, F. nubicola and F. viridis. Euphytica 143:201-207. 8. Bringhurst, R. S. and Y. D. A. Senanayake. 1966. The evolutionary significance of natural Fragaria chiloensis × F. vesca hybrids resulting from unreduced gametes. American Journal of Botany 53:1000-1006. 9. Carew, J. G., M. Morretini, and N. H. Battey. 2003. Misshapen fruits in strawberry. Small Fruits Review 2:37-50. 10. Catling, P. M. and U. Porebski. 1998. A morphometric evaluation of the subspecies of Fragaria chiloensis. Canadian Journal of Botany 76:290-297. 11. Chen, Y. F. 1995. Vegetation of Taiwan: Alpine zone and alpine plants. 2nd ed. Morning Star, Taichung, Taiwan. p. 492-494. (陳玉峰. 1995. 台灣植被誌第二卷:高山植被帶與高山植物(下). 晨星出版. 台中. p. 492-494.) 12. Dale, A. 1996. A key and vegetative descriptions of thirty-two common strawberry varieties grown in North America. Advances in Strawberry Research 15:1-12. 13. Dale, A. and T. M. Sjulin. 1990. Few cytoplasms contribute to North American strawberry cultivars. HortScience 25:1341-1342. 14. Darnell, R. L., D. J. Cantliffe, D. S. Kirschbaum, and G. K. Chandler. 2003. The physiology of flowering in strawberry. Horticultural Reviews 28:325-349. 15. Darrow, G. M. 1966. The strawberry. History, breeding and physiology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. New York, US. 16. Deng, M. and J. Lei. 2005. China Fruit-plant Monograph: Strawberry Volume. China Forestry, Beijing, China. (in Chinese) 17. Evans, W. D. 1974. Evidence of a crossibility barrier in diploid × hexaploid and diploid x octoploid crosses in the genus Fragaria. Euphytica 23:95-100. 18. Evans, W. D. 1977. The use of synthetic octoploids in strawberry breeding. Euphytica 26:497-503. 19. Evans, W. D. 1982a. Guelph SO1 sythetic octoploid strawberry breeding clone. HortScience 17:833-834. 20. Evans, W. D. 1982b. Guelph SO2 sythetic octoploid strawberry breeding clone. HortScience 17:834. 21. Folta, K. M. and T. M. Davis. 2006. Strawberry genes and genomics. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences 25:399-415. 22. García, M. G., M. Ontivero, J. C. Diaz Ricci, and A. Castagnaro. 2002. Morphological traits and high resolution RAPD markers for the identification of the main strawberry varieties cultivated in Argentina. Plant Breeding 126:76-80. 23. Gooding, H. J., R. J. McNicol, and D. MacIntyre. 1981. Methods of screening strawberries for resistance to Sphaerothca macularis (Wall ex Frier) and Phytophthora cactorum (Leb. and Cohn). Journal of Horticultural Science 56:239-245. 24. Guttridge, C. G. 1985. Fragaria ×ananassa, p.16-33. In: A. H. Halevy (ed.). CRC handbook of flowering. Vol. 3. CRC press, Boca Raton, Fla., US. 25. Hancock, J. F. 1999. Strawberries. CABI publishing. Wallingford, UK. 26. Hancock, J. F. and J. J. Luby. 1993. Genetic resources at our doorstep: the wild strawberries. BioScience 43:141-147. 27. Hancock, J. F., A. Dale, and J. Luby. 1993. Should we reconstitute the strawberry? Acta Horticulturae 348:86-92. 28. Hancock, J. F., C. A. Finn, S. C. Hokanson, J. J. Luby, B. L. Goulart, S. Serçe, A. M. C. Schilder, and K. E. Hummer. 2001b. A multistate comparison of native octoploid strawberries from North and South America. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 126:579-586. 29. Hancock, J. F., P. W. Callow, A. Dale, J. J. Luby, C. E. Finn, S. C. Hokanson, and K. E. Hummer. 2001a. From the Andes to the Rockies: Native strawberry collection and utilization. HortScience 36:221-225. 30. Hancock, J. F., P. W. Callow, S. Serçe, and P. Q. Son. 2003. Variations in the horticultural characteristics of native Fragaria virginiana and F. chiloensis from North and South America. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 128:201-208. 31. Hancock, J. F., T. M. Sjulin, and G. A. Lobos. 2008. Strawberries. In: Hancock, J. F. (ed.). Temperate fruit crop breeding. p. 393-437. Springer 32. Harbut, H. M. and J. A. Sullivan. 2004. Breeding potential of lower ploidy Fragaria species. Journal of the American Pomological Society 58:37-41. 33. Harrison, R. E., J. J. Luby, G. R. Furnier, and J. F. Hancock. 1997. Morphological and molecular variation among populations of octoploid Fragaria virginiana and F. chiloensis (Rosaceae) from North America. American Journal of Botany 84:612-620. 34. Hayata, B. 1908. Flora Montana Formosae. Journal of the College of Science, Imperial University of Tokyo 25:82-83. 35. Hayata, B. 1911. Materials for a flora of Formosa. The Journal of the College of Science Imperial University of Tokyo 30:97. 36. Haymes, K. M., B. Henken, T. M. Davis, and W. E. Van de Weg. 1997. Identification of RAPD markers linked to a Phytophthora fragariae resistance gene (Rpf1) in the cultivated strawberry. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 94:1097-1101. 37. Heide, O. M. and A. Sønsteby. 2007. Interactions of temperature and photoperiod in the control of flowering of latitudinal and altitudinal populations of wild strawberry (Fragaria vesca). Physiologia Plantarum 130:280-289. 38. Hu, K. K. 2001. Application of molecular markers in variety examination, p. 1-18. In: Yang, S. S. (ed.). Application of biotechnology in agriculture. Agriculture Exhibition Hall NTU, Taipei, Taiwan. (胡凱康. 2001. 分子標誌在品種鑑定上之應用. p.1-18. 刊於: 楊盛行編. 生物科技在農業上之應用. 台大農業陳列館. 台北.) 39. Hytönen, T., P. Palonen, K. Mouhu, and O. Junttila. 2004. Crown branching and cropping potential in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) can be enhanced by daylength treatments. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 79:466-471. 40. Kawakami, T. 1910. A list of plants of Formosa. Bureau of Productive Industry, Government of Formosa, Taipei, Taiwan. p.33. 41. Konsin, M., I. Voipio, and P. Palonen. 2001. Influence of photoperiod and duration of short-day treatment on vegetative and flowering of strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.). Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 76:77-82. 42. Kuras, A., M. Korbin, and E. Zurawicz. 2004. Comparison of suitability of RAPD and ISSR techniques for determination of strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) relationship. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture 79:189-193. 43. Lai, K. S. 2004. Plants of Mt. Hohuan. Endemic Species Research Institute, Nantou, Taiwan. p. 149. (賴國祥. 2004. 合歡山的彩色精靈. 農委會特有生物中心. 南投. p.149.) 44. Lei, J., H. Dai, C. Tan, M. Deng, M. Zhao, and Y. Qian. 2006. Studies on the taxonomy of the strawberry (Fragaria) species distributed in China. Acta Horticulturae Sinica 33:1-5. (in Chinese) 45. Li, C., I. Hiroshi, and O. Hideaki. 2003. Fragaria, p. 339-340. In: Wu, Z. Y., P. H. Raven, and D. Y. Hong (eds.). Flora of China. vol. 9. Science Press, Beijing, China. 46. Li, Y., X. Hou, L. Lin, S. Jing, and M. Deng. 2000. Abnormal pollen germination and embryo abortion in the interspecific corss, Fragaria ×ananassa × F. vesca, as related to cross incompatibility. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 69:84-89. (in Japanese with English abstract) 47. Lin, S. F. 2001. Application of molecular technology in agriculture, p. 21-30. In: Yang, S. S. (ed.). Application of biotechnology in agriculture. Agriculture Exhibition Hall NTU, Taipei, Taiwan. (林順福. 2001. 分子科技在農業上之應用. p. 21-30. 刊於: 楊盛行編. 生物科技在農業上之應用. 台大農業陳列館. 台北.) 48. Lin, S. Y. 2004. Identification of wild citrus from Tongluo using morphological characteristics and RAPD markers. National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Master Thesis. (in Chinese) 49. Luby, J. J., J. F. Hancock, A. Dale, and S. Serçe. 2008. Reconstructing Fragaria ×ananassa utilizing wild F. virginiana and F. chiloensis: inheritance of winter injury, photoperiod sensitivity, fruit size, female fertility and disease resistance in hybrid progenies. Euphytica 163:57-65. 50. Luby, J. J., J. F. Hancock, and J. R. Ballington. 1992. Collection of native strawberry germplasm in the Pacific Northwest and Northern Rocky Mountains of the United States. HortScience 27:12-17. 51. Makino, T. 1912. Observations on the flora of Japan. Botanical Magazine 26:285-289. 52. Marta, A. E., E. L. Camadro, J. C. Díaz-Ricci, and A. P. Castagnaro. 2004. Breeding barriers between the cultivated strawberry, Fragaria ×ananassa, and related wild gerplasm. Euphytica 136:130-150. 53. Milella, L., D. Saluzzi, M. Lapelosa, G. Bertino, P. Spada, I. Greco, and G. Martelli. 2006. Relationship between an Italian strawberry ecotype and its ancestor using RAPD markers. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution 53:1715-1720. 54. Miller A. R., J. C. Scheerens, P. S. Erb, and C. K. Chandler. 1992. Enhanced strawberry seed germination through in vitro culture of cut achenes. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 117:313-316. 55. Naruhashi, N., Y. Iwatsubo, and C. I. Peng. 1999. Cytology, flower morphology, and distribution of Fragaria hayatae Makino (Rosaceae). Journal of Phytogeography and Taxonomy 47:139-143. 56. Nielsen, J. A. and P. H. Lovell. 2000. Value of morphological characteristics for cultivar identification in strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa). New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 28:89-96. 57. Nitsch, J. P. 1950. Growth and morphogenesis of the strawberry as related to auxin. American Journal of Botany 37:211-215. 58. Noguchi Y., T. Mochizuki, and K. Sone. 2002. Breeding of a new aromatic strawberry by interspecific hybridization Fragaria ×ananassa × F. nilgerrensis. Journal of the Japanese Society for Horticultural Science 71:208-213. 59. Ohashi, H. 1993. Fragaria, p.79-80. In: Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan (eds.). Flora of Taiwan. 2nd ed. Vol. 3. National Science Council, Taipei, Taiwan. 60. Ontivero, M., M. Arias, J. D. Ricci, J. Babot, P. Albornoz, and A. Castagnaro. 2000. Analysis of genetic similarities among species of Fragaria, Potentilla, Duchesnea found in northwest Argentina by using morphological, anatomical, and molecular characteristics. Canadian Journal of Botany 78:547-556. 61. Porebski, S. and P. M. Catling. 1998. RAPD analysis of the relationship of North and South American subspecies of Fragaria chiloensis. Canadian Journal of Botany 76:1812-1817. 62. Sangiacomo, M. A. and J. A. Sullivan. 1994. Introgression of wild species into the cultivated strawberry using synthetic octoploids. Theoretical and applied genetics 88:349-354. 63. Sargent, D. J., M. Geibel, J. A. Hawkins, M. J. Wilkinson, N. H. Battey, and D. W. Simpson. 2004. Quantitative and qualitative differences in morphological traits revealed between diploid Fragaria species. Annals of Botany 94:787-796. 64. Sjulin, T. M. and A. Dale. 1987. Genetic diversity of North American strawberry cultivars. Journal of the American Society of Horticultural Science 112:375-385. 65. Sønsteby, A. and A. Nes. 1998. Short days and temperature effects on growth and flowering in strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.). Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 73:730-736. 66. Spooner, D., R. van Treuren, and M. C. de Vicente. 2005. Molecular markers for genebank management. IPGRI Technical Bulletin No. 10. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. 67. Staudt, G. 1989. The species of Fragaria, their taxonomy and geographical distribution. Acta Horticulturae 265: 23-33. 68. Staudt, G. 1999. Notes on Asiatic Fragaria species: Fragaria nilgerrensis Schltdl. ex J. Gay. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 121: 297-310. 69. Staudt, G. 2003. Notes on Asiatic Fragaria species: III. Fragaria orientalis Losinsk. and Fragaria mandshurica spec. nov. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 124:397-419. 70. Staudt, G. and W. B. Dickoré. 2001. Notes on Asiatic Fragaria species: Fragaria pentaphylla Losinsk. and Fragaria tibetica spec. nov. Botanische Jahrbücher für Systematik, Pflanzengeschichte und Pflanzengeographie 123:341-354. 71. Staudt, G., F. Drawert, and F. Tressl. 1975. Gas-chromatographic mass spectrometric differentiation of aroma substances from strawberry species. 2. Fragaria nilgerrensis. Journal of Plant Breeding 75:36-42. (In Germen with English summary). 72. Sugimoto, T., K. Tamaki, J. Matsumoto, Y. Yamamoto, K. Shiwaku, and K. Watanabe. 2005. Detection of RAPD markers linked to the everbearing gene in Japanese cultivated strawberry. Plant Breeding 124:498-501. 73. Taylor, D. R. 2002. The physiology of flowering in strawberry. Acta Horticulturae 567:245-251. 74. Torres, A. M., N. F. Weeden, and A. Marten. 1993. Linkage among isozyme, RFLP, and RAPD markers in Vicia faba. Theoretical Applied Genetics 85:937-945. 75. Trajkovski K. 1997. Further work on species hybridization in Fragaria at Balsgård. Acta Horticulturae 439:67-73. 76. Verheul, M. J., A. Sønsteby, and S. O. Grimstad. 2006. Interactions of photoperiod, temperature, duration of short-day treatment, and plant age on flowering of Fragaria ×ananassa Duch. cv. Korona. Scientia Horticulturae 107: 164-170. 77. Wen, S. L. 1984. Effect of temperature on growth and development of Harunoka strawberries (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.). National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Master Thesis. (in Chinese) 78. Williams, J. G. K., A. R. Kubelik, K. J. Livak, J. A. Rafalski, and S. V. Tingey. 1990. DNA polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic Acids Research 18:6531-6535. 79. Xue, S., R. H. Bors, and S. E. Strelkov. 2005. Resistance sources to Xanthomonas fragaria in non-octoploid strawberry species. HortScience 40:1653-1656. 80. Zhang X., D. G. Himelrick, F. M. Woods, and R. C. Ebel. 2000. Effect of temperature, photopefiod and pretreatment growing condition on floral induction in springbearing strawberry. Small Fruits Review 1:113-123. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9301 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 台灣草苺(Fragaria hayatae Makino)是台灣之特有種,部份文獻認為是黃毛草苺(F. nilgerrensis Schlecht.)的一個亞種。但台灣草苺果實紅色且富含花青素,形態上明顯異於黃毛草苺。本研究室曾於小雪山採集得一群形態異於典型台灣草苺,但與黃毛草苺較相近之白果草苺,此群草苺在台灣尚無文獻紀錄。本試驗調查台灣草苺、白果草苺、黃毛草苺及其他草苺屬植物形態特徵及RAPD分子標誌之差異,以釐清其間之親緣關係與分類地位。性狀調查結果顯示白果草苺之葉柄及走莖為綠色,花瓣及果實均為白色;台灣草苺之葉柄及走莖為紅色,花瓣為白色基部帶有紅紫色條斑,果實為紅色;黃毛草苺之葉柄為綠色,走莖為紅色,花瓣及果實為白色。白果草苺與台灣草苺之葉片與花之大小以及果實高無顯著差異,而黃毛草苺之葉片、葉柄、花之大小及果高則顯著大於台灣草苺及白果草苺。RAPD分子標誌分析之結果顯示,白果草苺與台灣草苺的親緣關係非常接近(相似距離 = 0.94),這兩者與黃毛草苺則有相當程度之差異(相似距離 = 0.43)。綜合形態特徵調查及RAPD分子標誌分析結果,台灣草苺應非黃毛草苺之一個亞種,且白果草苺應為台灣草苺之變種而非來自中國的黃毛草苺。
為配合種間雜交之需求,本試驗亦研究溫度與光週對台灣草苺生育之影響。結果顯示低溫會抑制台灣草苺之營養生長,低溫處理結束植株移至溫暖環境數週後,低溫處理者之營養生長反而較旺盛。以15/10℃或10/5℃配合10小時日長處理6至10週後,25%-50%之植株可開花。以15/10℃配合14小時日長或10小時日長以及15/5℃配合10小時日長處理6週後,8.3%之台灣草苺可開花。由於開花植株百分比低於50%,台灣草苺之最合適開花誘導條件仍待進一步研究。 台灣草苺(2x)與栽培種草苺(F. ×ananassa)‘桃園三號’(8x)進行互交,以台灣草苺為母本時,雜交結果率為73%,而以栽培種草苺‘桃園三號’為母本,雜交結果率為41%。以栽培種草苺‘桃園三號’作為母本得到的雜交種子之發芽率為34%,另一組合之種子無法發芽。成功存活的21個雜交後代中,7株可開花結果,但果實多為畸形。畸形果可能是授粉不完全之結果,或可能是成功雜交得到5倍體之證據。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Fragaria hayatae Makino is endemic to Taiwan. It was considered as a subspecies of F. nilgerrensis Schlecht. in some literature, but F. hayatae is characterized with red fruit and anthocyanin in all parts of the plant, and it is significantaly distinct from F. nilgerrensis in morphological characteristics. A white-fruited strawberry population that is morphologically distinct from typical F. hayatae but similar to F. nilgerrensis was found in Shiaoshueshan by our lab, this white-fruited form was never reported in Taiwan. Morphological characteristics and RAPD markers were studied to clarify the relationship among F. hayatae, the white-fruited strawberry, F. nilgerrensis, and some other Fragaria species. The white-fruited strawberry had green petiole, green runner, white petal, and cream-white colored fruit which were distinct from the red petiole, red runner, white petal with purplish-red blush at base, and red fruit of F. hayatae. Fragaria nilgerrensis and the white-fruited strawberry both lack of anthocyanin coloration in petiole, petal, and fruit, but F. nilgerrensis had red runners whereas the white-fruited strawberry had green runners. Despite the color of the plants, the white-fruited strawberry and F. hayatae was similar in size of leaf, petiole, flower, and fruit height. Fragaria nilgerrensis was significantly larger than F. hayatae and the white-fruited strawberry in size of leaf, petiole diameter, and size of flower. RAPD marker analysis indicated closer relationship between the white-fruited strawberry with F. hayatae (similarity index = 0.94) rather than F. nilgerrensis (similarity index = 0.43). We suggested that the white-fruited strawberry should be a mutant of F. hayatae and not F. nilgerrensis from China.
For the need of interspecific hybridization, the effects of temperature and photoperiod on growth and flowering in F. hayatae were studied. Cool temperature slowed down the vegetative growth rate during treatment, but accelerated the growth after transferring the plants into warm temperature condition for several weeks. Flowers were initiated in plants treated under 15/10℃ or 10/5℃ under 10 hour day length for 6-10 weeks, and plants treated under 15/10℃ 14 hour day length, 15/10℃ 10 hour day length, and 15/5℃ 10 hour day length for 6 weeks. The rate of plants flowering was 8.3% to 50% under the above condition, and the optimal inductive condition for flower initiation in F. hayatae awaits further investigation. Reciprocal cross was made between F. hayatae (diploid) and the cultivated strawberry ‘Taoyuan No. 3’ (octoploid) to study the interspecific hybridization compatibility. 34% of seeds from F. ×ananassa ‘Taoyuan No. 3’ × F. hayatae germinated while no seed germinated in the other combination. Seven out of the 21 survived hybrid seedlings bloomed and bore fruits. The fruits were usually misshaped, which should result from partial pollination, or might be the evidence of obtaining pentaploids from successful hybridization. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:16:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R95628136-1.pdf: 17922803 bytes, checksum: 35a220ae3133ea3c327ccc77bece855b (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iv Content - 1 - List of Figures - 3 - List of Tables - 5 - Introduction 1 Literature Review 3 1. Taxonomy and Distribution of the Strawberry Species 3 2. Brief History of Strawberry Domestication 7 3. Strawberry Species in Taiwan 8 4. Breeding Potential of the Wild Strawberries 9 5. Application of Morphological Traits in Fragaria Species 16 6. Application of RAPD Markers in Fragaria Species 18 7. Growth and Development of Strawberry 20 Materials and Methods 24 1. Morphological Variations among Fragaria hayatae, White-fruited Strawberry and other Fragaria Species 24 2. Molecular Variations among Fragaria hayatae, White-fruited Strawberry, and Other Fragaria Species 25 3. Effects of Temperature and Photoperiod on Growth and Flowering of Fragaria hayatae 29 4. Interspecific Hybridization between Fragaria hayatae and F. ×ananassa 31 Results and Discussion 33 1. Native Habitat of Fragaria hayatae and Discovery of the White-fruited Strawberry 33 2. Morphological Characteristics of Fragaria hayatae, White-fruited Strawberry and Other Fragaria Species 34 3. RAPD Characteristics of Fragaria hayatae, White-fruited Strawberry and Other Fragaria Species 43 4. Relationship between terminal leaflet and actual leaf area 45 5. Effects of Temperature and Photoperiod on Fragaria hayatae 46 6. Interspecific Hybridization between Fragaria × ananassa and F. hayatae 51 Conclusion 54 Reference 55 | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.title | 台灣草苺(Fragaria hayatae Makino)之植物性狀及其與‘桃園三號’草苺(Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.)之種間雜交 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Fragaria hayatae Makino: Characteristics and Artificial Hybridization with ‘Taoyuan No.3’ Strawberry (Fragaria ×ananassa Duch.) | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李金龍(Chin-Lung Lee),鄭正勇(Cheng-Yung Cheng),阮素芬(Su-Fen Roan),彭鏡毅(Ching-I Peng) | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 形態,光週,逢機增殖多型性去氧核糖核酸,溫度, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | morphology,photoperiod,RAPD,temperature, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 99 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-06 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 生物資源暨農學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 園藝學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位: | 園藝暨景觀學系 | |
文件中的檔案:
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf | 17.5 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。
