請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92990完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉仲恩 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | John Chung-En Liu | en |
| dc.contributor.author | Nanami Yano | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Nanami Yano | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-12T16:09:45Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-13 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-12 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Abrams, D., Ando, K., & Hinkle, S. (1998). Psychological Attachment to the Group: Cross-Cultural Differences in Organizational Identification and Subjective Norms as Predictors of Workers’ Turnover Intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(10), 1027–1039. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982410001
Ajzen, I. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs. https://cir.nii.ac.jp/crid/1572543024551612928 Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1975). A Bayesian analysis of attribution processes. Psychological Bulletin, 82(2), 261–277. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076477 Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism (Revised Edition). Verso. Ando, K., Ohnuma, susumu, Blöbaum, A., Matthies, E., & Sugiura, J. (2010). Determinants of Individual and Collective Pro-Environmental Behaviors: Comparing Germany and Japan. J Ournal of Environmental Information Science, 38(5), 21–32. Ando, K., Ohnuma, S., & Chang, E. C. (2007). Comparing normative influences as determinants of environmentally conscious behaviours between the USA and Japan. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 10(3), 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2007.00223.x Assis, N., Reysen, S., & Katzarska-Miller, I. (2017). Being Global Is Being Green: Associations Between Global Citizenship Identification and Measures of Environmental Motivations and Attitudes. International Journal of Energy Policy and Management, 2(3), 13–19. Aydin, E., Bagci, S. C., & Kelesoglu, İ. (2022). Love for the globe but also the country matter for the environment: Links between nationalistic, patriotic, global identification and pro-environmentalism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 80, 101755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101755 Balundė, A., Perlaviciute, G., & Steg, L. (2019). The Relationship Between People’s Environmental Considerations and Pro-environmental Behavior in Lithuania. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2319. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02319 Bauer, J. M., Van Der Laan, L. N., Bruijn, G.-J. D., & Reisch, L. A. (2022). Battle of the primes – The effect and interplay of health and hedonic primes on food choice. Appetite, 172, 105956. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.105956 Binnie, J., Holloway, J., Millington, S., & Young, C. (2009). Cosmopolitanism. International Encyclopedia of Human Geography, 307–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-008044910-4.00928-7 Bonaiuto, M., Breakwell, G. M., & Cano, I. (1996). Identity Processes and Environmental Threat: The Effects of Nationalism and Local Identity upon Perception of Beach Pollution. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6(3), 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1298(199608)6:3<157::AID-CASP367>3.0.CO;2-W Brutus, S., Aguinis, H., & Wassmer, U. (2013). Self-Reported Limitations and Future Directions in Scholarly Reports: Analysis and Recommendations. Journal of Management, 39(1), 48–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312455245 Buchan, N. R., Brewer, M. B., Grimalda, G., Wilson, R. K., Fatas, E., & Foddy, M. (2011). Global Social Identity and Global Cooperation. Psychological Science, 22(6), 821–828. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611409590 Carrus, G., Scopelliti, M., Fornara, F., Bonnes, M., & Bonaiuto, M. (2014). Place attachment, community identification and pro-environmental engagement. In Place attachment. Advances in Theory, Methods and Applications (pp. 154–164). Cichocka, A., & Cislak, A. (2020). Nationalism as collective narcissism. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.12.013 Cislak, A., Wojcik, A. D., & Cichocka, A. (2018). Cutting the forest down to save your face: Narcissistic national identification predicts support for anti-conservation policies. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 59, 65–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.08.009 Clayton, S., Devine-Wright, P., Swim, J., Bonnes, M., Steg, L., Whitmarsh, L., & Carrico, A. (2016). Expanding the role for psychology in addressing environmental challenges. American Psychologist, 71(3), 199–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039482 Clayton, S., & Kilinç, A. (2013). Proenvironmental concern and behavior in Turkey: The role of national and environmental identity. Psychology, 4(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1174/217119713807749850 Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203771587 Danner, H., & Thøgersen, J. (2022). Does online chatter matter for consumer behaviour? A priming experiment on organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 46(3), 850–869. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12732 Der-Karabetian, A., Alfaro, M., & Cao, Y. (2018). Relationship of Sustainable Behavior, World-Mindedness, National and Global Identities, Perceived Environmental Risk and Globalization Impact Among College Students in the United States. Psychology and Cognitive Sciences - Open Journal, 4(1), 8–13. https://doi.org/10.17140/PCSOJ-4-138 Der-Karabetian, A., Cao, Y., & Alfaro, M. (2014). Sustainable Behavior, Perceived Globalization Impact, World-Mindedness, Identity, and Perceived Risk in College Samples from the United States, China, and Taiwan. Ecopsychology, 6(4), 218–233. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2014.0035 Devine-Wright, P., Price, J., & Leviston, Z. (2015). My country or my planet? Exploring the influence of multiple place attachments and ideological beliefs upon climate change attitudes and opinions. Global Environmental Change, 30, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.012 Diaconis, P., & Efron, B. (1983). Computer-Intensive Methods in Statistics. Scientific American, 248(5), 116–131. Dunlap, R. E., Van Liere, K. D., Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. J. (1994). An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall/CRC. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429246593 Fattori, F., Pozzi, M., Marzana, D., & Mannarini, T. (2015). A proposal for an integrated model of prosocial behavior and collective action as the expression of global citizenship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(7), 907–917. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2154 Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley. Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018). A Social Identity Model of Pro-Environmental Action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125(2), 245–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000090 Furlong, C., & Vignoles, V. L. (2021). Social Identification in Collective Climate Activism: Predicting Participation in the Environmental Movement, Extinction Rebellion. Identity, 21(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15283488.2020.1856664 Gaertner, S. L., Dovidio, J. F., Anastasio, P. A., Bachman, B. A., & Rust, M. C. (1993). The Common Ingroup Identity Model: Recategorization and the Reduction of Intergroup Bias. European Review of Social Psychology, 4(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779343000004 Grazzini, L., Rodrigo, P., Aiello, G., & Viglia, G. (2018). Loss or gain? The role of message framing in hotel guests’ recycling behaviour. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 26(11), 1944–1966. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2018.1526294 Greenland, S., Senn, S. J., Rothman, K. J., Carlin, J. B., Poole, C., Goodman, S. N., & Altman, D. G. (2016). Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: A guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology, 31(4), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-016-0149-3 Hamada, T., Shimizu, M., & Ebihara, T. (2021). Good patriotism, social consideration, environmental problem cognition, and pro-environmental attitudes and behaviors: A cross-sectional study of Chinese attitudes. SN Applied Sciences, 3(3), 361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-021-04358-1 Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., Bain, P. G., & Fielding, K. S. (2016). Meta-analyses of the determinants and outcomes of belief in climate change. Nature Climate Change, 6(6), 622–626. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943 Hovden, E., & Lindseth, G. (2004). Discourses in Norwegian Climate Policy: National Action or Thinking Globally? Political Studies, 52(1), 63–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2004.00464.x Howard, J. A. (2000). Social Psychology of Identities. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 367–393. Hsieh, J. F. (2005). Ethnicity, National Identity, and Domestic Politics in Taiwan. Journal of Asian and African Studies, 40(1–2), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909605052936 Janmaimool, P., & Khajohnmanee, S. (2020). Enhancing university students’ global citizenship, public mindedness, and moral quotient for promoting sense of environmental responsibility and pro-environmental behaviours. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 22(2), 957–970. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0228-6 Komatsu, H., Fu, S.-P., Lin, M.-H., Hsieh, Y.-H., Rappleye, J., & Silova, I. (2022). Measuring the Transformation of University Students’ Self-Construal for Greater Environmental Sustainability. SAGE Open, 12(1), 215824402210798. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221079836 Komatsu, H., & Rappleye, J. (2017). A new global policy regime founded on invalid statistics? Hanushek, Woessmann, PISA, and economic growth. Comparative Education, 53(2), 166–191. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2017.1300008 Lange, F., & Dewitte, S. (2019). Measuring pro-environmental behavior: Review and recommendations. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 92–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.04.009 Lee, K., Ashton, M. C., Choi, J., & Zachariassen, K. (2015). Connectedness to Nature and to Humanity: Their association and personality correlates. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01003 Liu, D.-C. (2022). Residential and industrial electricity consumption in Taiwan: Weather or macroeconomic condition (or both). Energy Strategy Reviews, 39, 100795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2021.100795 Liu, J. H., & Sibley, C. G. (2012). Hope for the Future? Understanding Self‐Sacrifice Among Young Citizens of the World in the Face of Global Warming. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 12(1), 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2011.01275.x Loy, L. S., & Reese, G. (2019). Hype and hope? Mind-body practice predicts pro-environmental engagement through global identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 66, 101340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101340 Lu, H., Zhang, W., Diao, B., Liu, Y., Chen, H., Long, R., & Cai, S. (2023). The progress and trend of pro-environmental behavior research: A bibliometrics-based visualization analysis. Current Psychology, 42(8), 6912–6932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01809-1 McShane, B. B., Gal, D., Gelman, A., Robert, C., & Tackett, J. L. (2019). Abandon Statistical Significance. The American Statistician, 73(sup1), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2018.1527253 Milfont, T. L., Osborne, D., Yogeeswaran, K., & Sibley, C. G. (2020). The role of national identity in collective pro-environmental action. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101522 Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology Japan [MEXT]. (2009, January 27). グローバル化と教育に関して議論していただきたい論点例 [Discussion points on globalization and education]. 文部科学省ホームページ. https://www.mext.go.jp/b_menu/shingi/chousa/kokusai/004/gijiroku/attach/1247196.htm Ministry of Education Taiwan [MOE]). (2020a). 中小學國際教育白皮書 2.0 [International Education White Paper 2.0 for Primary and Secondary Schools]. Ministry of Education Taiwan [MOE]). (2020b, September 22). 教育部全球資訊網 [Ministry of Education Global Information Network]. 教育部全球資訊網. https://www.edu.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=9E7AC85F1954DDA8&s=C56B0FF1E7E21B45&Create=1 Neumayer, E. (2002). Do Democracies Exhibit Stronger International Environmental Commitment? A Cross-country Analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343302039002001 Ng, S., & Basu, S. (2019). Global Identity and Preference for Environmentally Friendly Products: The Role of Personal Responsibility. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 50(8), 919–936. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119873432 OECD. (2018). Preparing Our Youth for an Inclusive and Sustainable World: The Oecd Pisa Global Competence Framework. Perdices, M. (2018). Null Hypothesis Significance Testing, p-values, Effects Sizes and Confidence Intervals. Brain Impairment, 19(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2017.28 Perez-Cueto, F. J. A. (2021). Nudging plant-based meals through the menu. International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science, 24, 100346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgfs.2021.100346 Pong, V., & Tam, K.-P. (2023). Relationship between global identity and pro-environmental behavior and environmental concern: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1033564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1033564 Poškus, M. S., & Žukauskienė, R. (2017). Predicting adolescents’ recycling behavior among different big five personality types. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 54, 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2017.10.003 Rabinovich, A., Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., & Verplanken, B. (2012). Collective self and individual choice: The effects of inter‐group comparative context on environmental values and behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(4), 551–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02022.x Renger, D., & Reese, G. (2017). From Equality‐Based Respect to Environmental Activism: Antecedents and Consequences of Global Identity. Political Psychology, 38(5), 867–879. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12382 Salomon, E., Preston, J. L., & Tannenbaum, M. B. (2017). Climate Change Helplessness and the (De)moralization of Individual Energy Behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000105 Scafuto, F. (2021). Individual and social‐psychological factors to explain climate change efficacy: The role of mindfulness, sense of global community, and egalitarianism. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(6), 2003–2022. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22576 Schulte, M., Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Rollin, P. (2020). Social identity as a key concept for connecting transformative societal change with individual environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101525 Stanley, S. K., Wilson, M. S., & Milfont, T. L. (2017). Exploring short-term longitudinal effects of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation on environmentalism. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 174–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.11.059 Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.004 Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. Sun, S., Pan, W., & Wang, L. L. (2010). A comprehensive review of effect size reporting and interpreting practices in academic journals in education and psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019507 Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories | Social psychology. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/tw/academic/subjects/psychology/social-psychology/human-groups-and-social-categories-studies-social-psychology, https://www.cambridge.org/tw/academic/subjects/psychology/social-psychology Tam, K.-P., & Chan, H.-W. (2018). Generalized trust narrows the gap between environmental concern and pro-environmental behavior: Multilevel evidence. Global Environmental Change, 48, 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.12.001 Tseng, Y. C. (2019). 臺灣國中青少年之自然連結量表編製與信效度分析 [The Development of Connection With Nature Scale for Junior-High-School Adolescents]. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 27(4), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.6173/CJSE.201912_27(4).0006 Tseng, Y. C., Sakurai, R., & To, K. (2021). Comparing Undergraduates’ Connection with Nature and New Ecological Paradigm in Relation to Intention of Environmental Behaviors in Taiwan and Japan. Japanese Journal of Environmental Education, 31(2), 38–50. Türken, S., & Rudmin, F. (2013). On Psychological Effects of Globalization: Development of a Scale of Global Identity. Psychology & Society, 5, 63–89. Udall, A. M., De Groot, J. I. M., De Jong, S. B., & Shankar, A. (2020). How do I see myself? A systematic review of identities in pro‐environmental behaviour research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(2), 108–141. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1798 UNESCO. (2014). Global Citizenship Education: Preparing Learners for the Challenges of the 21st Century. Van Der Werff, E., & Steg, L. (2016). The psychology of participation and interest in smart energy systems: Comparing the value-belief-norm theory and the value-identity-personal norm model. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 107–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.08.022 Verkuyten, M., & Yildiz, A. A. (2007). National (Dis)identification and Ethnic and Religious Identity: A Study Among Turkish-Dutch Muslims. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1448–1462. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207304276 Wang, P., Dong, Z., Cai, S., & Xiao, M. (2023). Proud of You, so Act for You? The Role of National Pride in Promoting Individual Pro-Environmental Tendencies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1103635. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1103635 Winkel, G., Saegert, S., & Evans, G. W. (2009). An ecological perspective on theory, methods, and analysis in environmental psychology: Advances and challenges. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.02.005 Zhang, L., Ruiz-Menjivar, J., Luo, B., Liang, Z., & Swisher, M. E. (2020). Predicting climate change mitigation and adaptation behaviors in agricultural production: A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the Value-Belief-Norm Theory. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 68, 101408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101408 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92990 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 解決全球環境問題需要深入了解影響環保行為的因素。個人努力固然重要，但實現全球性的集體行動也勢在必行。培養大規模的集體認同感一直備受關注，因為這是培養後代將集體利益置於個人利益之上的策略。然而，由於過去的研究對全球認同和國家認同在影響親環境主義方面的作用結果不一，這種關聯仍不明確；此外，過去的大多數研究忽視了國家認同中民族主義和愛國主義的雙重面貌。此外，該領域的大多數實證研究都是在西方背景下進行的，對亞洲國家的研究不足。本研究探討了全球認同、愛國主義和民族主義在預測台灣和日本大學生親環境信念和行為的相對重要性。相關分析表明，在台灣和日本，全球認同都是親環境主義的最佳預測因素，但台灣的全球認同與親環境主義之間的相關性要比日本強得多。另一方面，愛國主義和民族主義並沒有表現出明顯的對立效應。在台灣，愛國主義有效地預測了親環境主義，而在日本，國家認同變數與親環境主義變數之間沒有一致的相關性。這些結果不僅強調了全球認同的潛在重要性，也揭示了台灣和日本在想像社群影響上的潛在差異。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Tackling global environmental issues requires a deep understanding of the factors influencing pro-environmental behaviors. Individual efforts are crucial, but achieving worldwide collective action is imperative. The cultivation of large-scale collective identity has been drawing attention as a strategy to nurture future generations who prioritize collective benefit over individual interests. However, the association remains unclear, as previous research has shown mixed results on the role of global and national identity in influencing pro-environmentalism; moreover, most previous research overlooks the dual faces of nationalism and patriotism in national identity. Furthermore, the majority of empirical studies in the field have been conducted in Western contexts, leaving Asian nations under-researched. This study investigates the relative importance of global identification, patriotism, and nationalism in predicting pro-environmental beliefs and behaviors among Taiwanese and Japanese university students. The correlational analysis shows that global identification was the best predictor of pro-environmentalism in both Taiwan and Japan, but the correlation between global identification and pro-environmentalism was much stronger in Taiwan than in Japan. On the other hand, patriotism and nationalism showed no clear opposing effects. While patriotism effectively predicts pro-environmentalism in Taiwan, there was no consistent correlation between the national identity variable and pro-environmentalism variables in Japan. These results not only highlight the potential importance of global identification but also reveal the potential differences in the influence of imagined communities in the context of Taiwan and Japan. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-12T16:09:45Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-12T16:09:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 中文摘要 ii
Abstract iii Table of Contents iv 1. Introduction 1 1.1 Background 1 1.2 Research Aim and Questions 3 2. Literature Review 5 2.1 Understanding Pro-environmental Behaviors 5 2.2 Global Identification and Pro-Environmentalism 7 2.3 National Identification and Pro-Environmentalism 10 3. Materials and Methods 14 3.2 Data Collection 14 3.3 Measures 16 3.4 Data Analysis Methods 19 4. Results 23 4.1 Sample Demographics 23 4.2 Descriptive Statistics Results 25 4.3 Correlational Analysis Results 26 5. Discussion & Conclusion 36 5.1 Global Identification as an Important Predictor of Pro-Environmentalism 36 5.2 Inconsistent Results for Patriotism and Nationalism 37 5.3 Interpretation of Cross-National Variation 38 5.4 Implications for Educational Policies and Interventions in Taiwan and Japan 41 6. Limitations and Future Research 43 7. References 46 8. Appendices 57 Appendix A: Online Survey Questionnaire in Traditional Chinese 57 Appendix B: Online Survey Questionnaire in Japanese 65 Appendix C: Correlation Matrix of All Items in Taiwan 72 Appendix D: Correlation Matrix of All Items in Japan 74 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.subject | 想象社群 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 愛國主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 民族主義 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 全球認同 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 環保行為 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 環保意識 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | 國家認同 | zh_TW |
| dc.subject | Patriotism | en |
| dc.subject | Pro-environmental beliefs | en |
| dc.subject | Pro-environmental behaviors | en |
| dc.subject | Global identification | en |
| dc.subject | National identification | en |
| dc.subject | Nationalism | en |
| dc.subject | Imagined communities | en |
| dc.title | 重新思考連結：全球和國家認同對台灣和日本環保意識的影響 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Rethinking the Connection: Influence of Global and National Identity on Pro-Environmentalism in Taiwan and Japan | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 小松光;洪立三 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Hikaru Komatsu;Li-San Hung | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 環保意識,環保行為,全球認同,國家認同,愛國主義,民族主義,想象社群, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Pro-environmental beliefs,Pro-environmental behaviors,Global identification,National identification,Patriotism,Nationalism,Imagined communities, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 75 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401535 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-08 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2029-07-05 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 此日期後於網路公開 2029-07-05 | 9.42 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。