請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92976完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 江俊毅 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | James J. Jiang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 何宣霈 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsuan-Pei Ho | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-10T16:08:04Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-07-11 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-07-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-07-02 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | APM. (2012). APM Body of Knowledge. Association for Project Management.
AXELOS (2020). Managing Successful Programmes (5th ed.). Peoplecert International Ltd. Andersen, E. S. (2014). Value creation using the mission breakdown structure. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 885-892. Bassellier, G., & Benbasat, I. (2004). Business competence of information technology professionals: Conceptual development and influence on IT-business partnerships. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 673-694. Bassellier, G., Reich, B. H., & Benbasat, I. (2001). Information technology competence of business managers: A definition and research model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(4), 159-182. Bharadwaj, A., El Sawy, O. A., Pavlou, P. A., & Venkatraman, N. V. (2013). Digital business strategy: Toward a next generation of insights. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 471-482. Boh, W. F., & Yellin, D. (2006). Using enterprise architecture standards in managing information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 23(3), 163-207. Chi, M., Zhao, J., George, J. F., Li, Y., & Zhai, S. (2017). The influence of inter-firm IT governance strategies on relational performance: The moderation effect of information technology ambidexterity. International Journal of Information Management, 37(2), 43-53. Chong, J. L., & Duong, L. N. (2017). Understanding IT governance effectiveness in Asia: An event study. Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(1), 29-54. Coombs, C. R. (2015). When planned IS/IT project benefits are not realized: A study of inhibitors and facilitators to benefits realization. International Journal of Project Management, 33(2), 363-379. Crawford, L., Cooke‐Davies, T., Hobbs, B., Labuschagne, L., Remington, K., & Chen, P. (2008). Governance and support in the sponsoring of projects and programs. Project Management Journal, 39(S1), S43-S55. Dubé, L., & Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: Current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597-636. Garland, R. (2009). Project Governance: A Practical Guide to Effective Project Decision Making. Kogan Page Publishers. Gregory, R. W., Keil, M., Muntermann, J., & Mähring, M. (2015). Paradoxes and the nature of ambidexterity in IT transformation programs. Information Systems Research, 26(1), 57-80. Gu, B., Xue, L., & Ray, G. (2008). IT governance and IT investment performance: An empirical analysis. In the Twenty Ninth International Conference on Information Systems, Paris, France. Hjelmbrekke, H., Klakegg, O. J., & Lohne, J. (2017). Governing value creation in construction project: A new model. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 10(1), 60-83. Hjelmbrekke, H., Lædre, O., & Lohne, J. (2014). The need for a project governance body. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 7(4), 661-677. Jedynak, M., Czakon, W., Kuźniarska, A., & Mania, K. (2021). Digital transformation of organizations: What do we know and where to go next?. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 34(3), 629-652. Jensen M, Meckling W (1992) Specific and general knowledge and organizational structure. Werin L, Wijkander H, eds. Contract Economics (Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 251–274. Jiang, J. J. (2023). From information technology projects to digital transformation programs: Research pathways. Project Management Journal, 54(4), 327-333. Jiang, J. J., Chang, J. Y., Chen, H. G., Wang, E. T., & Klein, G. (2014). Achieving IT program goals with integrative conflict management. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(1), 79-106. Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., & Fernandez, W. D. (2018). From project management to program management: an invitation to investigate programs where IT plays a significant role. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 19(1), 40-57. Kelleher, D. (1995). Business programmes and information systems methodologies. Information Systems Journal, 5(2), 137-157. Lechler, T. G., & Thomas, J. L. (2015). Examining new product development project termination decision quality at the portfolio level: Consequences of dysfunctional executive advocacy. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1452-1463. Marnewick, C. (2016). Benefits of information system projects: The tale of two countries. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 748-760. Marnewick, C., & Labuschagne, L. (2011). An investigation into the governance of information technology projects in South Africa. International Journal of Project Management, 29(6), 661-670. Mikalef, P., Pateli, A., & van de Wetering, R. (2021). IT architecture flexibility and IT governance decentralisation as drivers of IT-enabled dynamic capabilities and competitive performance: The moderating effect of the external environment. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(5), 512-540. Müller, R. (2009). Project Governance. Gower Publishing, Ltd. Nadkarni, S., & Prügl, R. (2021). Digital transformation: A review, synthesis and opportunities for future research. Management Review Quarterly, 71, 233-341. Paré, G. (2004). Investigating information systems with positivist case research. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 13(1), 233-264. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2010). The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Information Systems Research, 21(3), 443-471. PMI. (2006). The Standard for Program Management. Project Management Institute. Reich, B. H. (2007). Managing knowledge and learning in IT projects: A conceptual framework and guidelines for practice. Project Management Journal, 38(2), 5-17. Reich, B. H., Gemino, A., & Sauer, C. (2008). Modeling the knowledge perspective of IT projects. Project Management Journal, 39(1_suppl), S4-S14. Sirisomboonsuk, P., Gu, V. C., Cao, R. Q., & Burns, J. R. (2018). Relationships between project governance and information technology governance and their impact on project performance. International Journal of Project Management, 36(2), 287-300. Terlizzi, M. A., Meirelles, F.d. S., & de Moraes, H. R. O. C. (2016). Barriers to the use of an IT Project Management Methodology in a large financial institution. International Journal of Project Management, 34(3), 467-479. Tiwana, A. (2009). Governance-knowledge fit in systems development projects. Information Systems Research, 20(2), 180-197. Tiwana, A., & Keil, M. (2009). Control in internal and outsourced software projects. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(3), 9-44. Tiwana, A., & Kim, S. K. (2015). Discriminating IT governance. Information Systems Research, 26(4), 656-674. Tiwana, A., & Konsynski, B. (2010). Complementarities between organizational IT architecture and governance structure. Information Systems Research, 21(2), 288-304. Too, E. G., & Weaver, P. (2014). The management of project management: A conceptual framework for project governance. International Journal of Project Management, 32(8), 1382-1394. Turner, J. R. (2006). Towards a theory of project management: The nature of the project governance and project management. International Journal of Project Management, 2(24), 93-95. ul Musawir, A., Serra, C. E. M., Zwikael, O., & Ali, I. (2017). Project governance, benefit management, and project success: Towards a framework for supporting organizational strategy implementation. International Journal of Project Management, 35(8), 1658-1672. ul Musawir, A., Abd-Karim, S. B., & Mohd-Danuri, M. S. (2020). Project governance and its role in enabling organizational strategy implementation: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Project Management, 38(1), 1-16. Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118-144. Weill, P., & Ross, J. W. (2004). IT Governance: How Top Performers Manage IT Decision Rights for Superior Results. Harvard Business Press. Winkler, T. J., & Brown, C. V. (2013). Horizontal allocation of decision rights for on-premise applications and software-as-a-service. Journal of Management Information Systems, 30(3), 13-48. Wu, X., Klein, G., & Jiang, J. J. (2023). On the road to digital transformation: A literature review of IT program management. Project Management Journal, 54(4), 409-427. Yin, R. K. (2003). Designing case studies. Qualitative Research Methods, 5(14), 359-386 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92976 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | IT賦能專案集群旨在幫助公司高效地將IT資產融入業務策略，從而創造競爭優勢和策略差異化，其贊助委員會的有效治理對IT賦能專案集群的成功至關重要。IT賦能專案集群贊助委員會對專案集群的治理包含兩個治理的維度，分別為專案集群治理和IT治理，明確的治理決策內涵將使專案集群贊助委員會所採取的決策行動更加有效。除此之外，有效治理的關鍵面向為獲取必要的知識。因此，本研究以質性訪談首先識別兩項治理維度所需執行的決策內涵，並進一步探索專案集群治理與IT治理各別相對應的知識。基於質性訪談研究結果，本研究識別出IT賦能專案集群治理的決策內涵，以及三種類型的必要知識，包含（1）用於專案集群決策的業務應用知識，（2）用於IT決策的IT知識，以及（3）同時用於這兩類決策的整合性IT-業務知識。通過識別IT賦能專案集群委員會的決策內涵與相對應的知識，將有助於提升決策有效性，進而提升專案集群的績效。本研究通過聚焦於IT賦能專案集群贊助委員所需的決策和知識，協助其提升決策效率，在學術及實務上皆針對IT賦能專案集群委員會的治理提出新的見解。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | IT-enabled programs aim to help companies efficiently integrate IT assets into business strategies, creating competitive advantages and strategic differentiation. Effective governance by the IT-enabled program sponsoring group is crucial to the success of these programs. The governance of IT-enabled programs by the sponsoring group involves two components: program governance and IT governance. Clear governance decision-making content will make the decisions and actions taken by the program sponsoring group more effective. Moreover, acquiring the necessary knowledge is a key aspect of effective governance.
This study uses qualitative interviews to first identify the decision-making content required for the two governance components and further explores the corresponding knowledge for program governance and IT governance. Based on the results of the qualitative interviews, this study identifies the decision items for the governance of IT-enabled programs and three types of essential knowledge: (1) business knowledge for program decisions, (2) IT knowledge for IT decisions, and (3) integrated IT-business knowledge for both types of decisions. By identifying the governance decision items and corresponding knowledge of the IT-enabled program sponsoring group, this will help enhance decision-making effectiveness, thereby improving program performance. This study, by focusing on the governance decisions and knowledge required by the IT-enabled program sponsoring group, aims to enhance decision-making efficiency and provide new insights into the governance of IT-enabled program sponsoring groups from both academic and practical perspectives. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-07-10T16:08:04Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-07-10T16:08:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 i
摘要 ii Abstract iii 1 Introduction 1 2 Literature Review 7 2.1 IT-enabled Program Governance 7 2.1.1 IT Governance 9 2.1.2 Program Governance and Project Governance 11 2.2 The Importance of Knowledge to IT-enabled Program Governance 12 3 Methodology 15 3.1 Research Method 15 3.2 Data Collection and Analysis 18 3.3 Case Background 21 4 Analysis and Discussion 25 4.1 Analysis 25 4.1.1 IT-enabled Program Sponsoring Group Decisions 25 4.1.2 IT-enabled Program Sponsoring Group Knowledge 38 4.1.3 Program Sponsoring Group Decision Effectiveness on Program Performance 52 4.1.4 Proposed Research Model 52 4.2 Discussion 55 4.2.1 IT-enabled Program Sponsoring group Decision Rights 55 4.2.2 IT-enabled Program Sponsoring group Knowledge 59 5 Implications and Limitations 63 5.1 Theoretical Implication 63 5.2 Managerial Implication 66 5.3 Limitation and Future Work 67 6 Conclusion 69 References 71 Appendix A – Characteristic of IT-enabled Program 74 Appendix B – Program Sponsoring Group Responsibility 76 Appendix C – IT Governance Decisions 77 Appendix D – Business Knowledge Domain for IT Managers 78 Appendix E – IT-related Knowledge for Business Manager 79 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.title | IT賦能專案集群贊助委員會有效治理的必要知識 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Essential Knowledge for Effective IT-Enabled Program Sponsoring Group Governance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 王存國;蔡家安 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Tswen-Gwo Wang;Chia-An Tsai | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | IT賦能專案集群,專案集群治理,IT治理,IT賦能專案集群治理委員會,知識識別, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | IT-Enabled Program,Program Governance,IT Governance,Program Sponsoring Group,Knowledge Identification, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 79 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401483 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-07-03 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 商學研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 商學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 998.32 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。