請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92720
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 劉啟群 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Chi-Chun Liu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 簡溎郳 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Kuei-Ni Chien | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-14T16:05:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-15 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-06-14 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-06-12 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. (2007). Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2-3), 411-437.
Alves, S. (2023). CEO duality, earnings quality and board independence. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 21(2), 217-231. Baliga, B. R., Moyer, R. C., & Rao, R. S. (1996). CEO duality and firm performance: What''s the fuss? Strategic Management Journal, 17(1), 41-53. Barth, M. E., Beaver, W. H., & Landsman, W. R. (2001). The relevance of the value relevance literature for financial accounting standard setting: another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3), 77-104. Barth, M. E., Landsman, W. R., Lang, M., & Williams, C. (2012). Are IFRS-based and US GAAP-based accounting amounts comparable? Journal of accounting and economics, 54(1), 68-93. Beasley, M. S. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. The Accounting Review, 443-465. Bentley, J. W., Christensen, T. E., Gee, K. H., & Whipple, B. C. (2018). Disentangling managers’ and analysts’ non‐GAAP reporting. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(4), 1039-1081. Bhattacharya, N., Black, E. L., Christensen, T. E., & Larson, C. R. (2003). Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 36(1-3), 285-319. Black, D. E., & Christensen, T. E. (2009). US managers'' use of ‘pro forma’adjustments to meet strategic earnings targets. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(3‐4), 297-326. Black, D. E., Christensen, T. E., Ciesielski, J. T., & Whipple, B. C. (2021). Non‐GAAP earnings: A consistency and comparability crisis? Contemporary Accounting Research, 38(3), 1712-1747. Bliss, M. A. (2011). Does CEO duality constrain board independence? Some evidence from audit pricing. Accounting & Finance, 51(2), 361-380. Bouaziz, D., Salhi, B., & Jarboui, A. (2020). CEO characteristics and earnings management: empirical evidence from France. Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 18(1), 77-110. Bradshaw, M. T., Christensen, T. E., Gee, K. H., & Whipple, B. C. (2018). Analysts’ GAAP earnings forecasts and their implications for accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 66(1), 46-66. Bradshaw, M. T., & Sloan, R. G. (2002). GAAP versus the street: An empirical assessment of two alternative definitions of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 40(1), 41-66. Brickley, J. A., Coles, J. L., & Jarrell, G. (1997). Leadership structure: Separating the CEO and chairman of the board. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3(3), 189-220. Chen, A., & Gong, J. J. (2019). Accounting comparability, financial reporting quality, and the pricing of accruals. Advances in Accounting, 45, 100415. Chen, B., Kurt, A. C., & Wang, I. G. (2020). Accounting comparability and the value relevance of earnings and book value. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 31(4), 82-98. Chen, C. W., Collins, D. W., Kravet, T. D., & Mergenthaler, R. D. (2018). Financial statement comparability and the efficiency of acquisition decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research, 35(1), 164-202. Choi, H., & Suh, S. (2019). The effect of financial reporting quality on CEO compensation structure: Evidence from accounting comparability. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 38(5), 106681. Curtis, A. B., McVay, S. E., & Whipple, B. C. (2014). The disclosure of non-GAAP earnings information in the presence of transitory gains. The Accounting Review, 89(3), 933-958. De Franco, G., Kothari, S. P., & Verdi, R. S. (2011). The benefits of financial statement comparability. Journal of Accounting Research, 49(4), 895-931. Dechow, P. M., Richardson, S. A., & Sloan, R. G. (2008). The persistence and pricing of the cash component of earnings. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(3), 537-566. Demb, A., & Neubauer, F.-F. (1992). The corporate board: Confronting the paradoxes. Long Range Planning, 25(3), 9-20. Desai, A., Kroll, M., & Wright, P. (2003). CEO duality, board monitoring, and acquisition performance: A test of competing theories. Journal of Business Strategies, 20(2), 137-156. Diamond, D. W. (1985). Optimal release of information by firms. The Journal of Finance, 40(4), 1071-1094. Doyle, C., Lennox, L., & Bell, D. (2013). A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open, 3(1), e001570. Doyle, J. T., Lundholm, R. J., & Soliman, M. T. (2003). The predictive value of expenses excluded from pro forma earnings. Review of Accounting Studies, 8, 145-174. Duru, A., Iyengar, R. J., & Zampelli, E. M. (2016). The dynamic relationship between CEO duality and firm performance: The moderating role of board independence. Journal of Business Research, 69(10), 4269-4277. Fama, E. F. (1980). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. The Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301-325. Farshadfar, S., Samarbakhsh, L., & Jiang, Y. (2023). Financial statement comparability and the usefulness of earnings: Some Canadian evidence. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 52, 100560. Frankel, R., McVay, S., & Soliman, M. (2011). Non-GAAP earnings and board independence. Review of Accounting Studies, 16, 719-744. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. The Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831-880. Johnson, W. B., & Schwartz Jr, W. C. (2005). Are investors misled by “pro forma” earnings? Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(4), 915-963. Kamarudin, K. A., Ismail, W. A. W., & Samsuddin, M. E. (2012). The influence of CEO duality on the relationship between audit committee independence and earnings quality. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 65, 919-924. Kang, E., & Zardkoohi, A. (2005). Board leadership structure and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(6), 785-799. Kao, L., & Chen, A. (2004). The effects of board characteristics on earnings management. Corporate Ownership & Control, 1(3), 96-107. Kim, M., & Kross, W. (2005). The ability of earnings to predict future operating cash flows has been increasing—not decreasing. Journal of Accounting Research, 43(5), 753-780. Kolev, K., Marquardt, C. A., & McVay, S. E. (2008). SEC scrutiny and the evolution of non‐GAAP reporting. The Accounting Review, 83(1), 157-184. Leung, E., & Veenman, D. (2018). Non‐GAAP earnings disclosure in loss firms. Journal of Accounting Research, 56(4), 1083-1137. Lougee, B. A., & Marquardt, C. A. (2004). Earnings informativeness and strategic disclosure: An empirical examination of “pro forma” earnings. The Accounting Review, 79(3), 769-795. Rechner, P. L., & Dalton, D. R. (1989). The impact of CEO as board chairperson on corporate performance: Evidence vs. rhetoric. Academy of Management Perspectives, 3(2), 141-143. Roberts, P. W., & Dowling, G. R. (2002). Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1077-1093. Saleh, N. M., Iskandar, T. M., & Rahmat, M. M. (2005). Earnings management and board characteristics: Evidence from Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan, 24, 77-103. Sloan, R. G. (1996). Do stock prices fully reflect information in accruals and cash flows about future earnings? The Accounting Review, 289-315. Whipple, B. C. (2015). The great unknown: Why exclude “other” items from non-GAAP earnings calculations in the post-reg G world? Available at SSRN 2480663. Xie, B., Davidson III, W. N., & DaDalt, P. J. (2003). Earnings management and corporate governance: the role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance, 9(3), 295-316. Xie, H. (2001). The mispricing of abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review, 76(3), 357-373. Yang, T., & Zhao, S. (2014). CEO duality and firm performance: Evidence from an exogenous shock to the competitive environment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 49, 534-552. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92720 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在美國,非一般公認會計原則(Non-GAAP)的財務資訊揭露愈趨普遍,管理階層可以選擇較為彈性的計算方式來反映公司盈餘,但缺乏一致性的衡量也引起許多學者的擔憂。然而,影響Non-GAAP盈餘品質的因素眾多,過去文獻證明可比較性與董事會特質皆會影響盈餘品質,但關於Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性的相關文獻較少。由於CEO為公司內部者,直接影響了財務資訊品質,CEO雙重性也會改變投資人對公司財務報表的判斷,故本研究選取CEO雙重性作為董事會特質變數,以探討CEO雙重性是否會強化或弱化Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性對Non-GAAP盈餘與未來績效攸關性的作用。
在2003年美國證券交易委員會(SEC)發布了一系列監管法規,加強對Non-GAAP盈餘衡量方式的監管,故本研究樣本選自2003至2021年間的美國公司資料,包含GAAP盈餘、Non-GAAP盈餘以及CEO雙重性等,並參照De Franco et al. (2011)的可比較性量化方式計算GAAP盈餘可比較性以及Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性。研究結果顯示,Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性對Non-GAAP盈餘攸關性會有正向作用,而CEO雙重性會減弱這種正向作用。投資人會預期CEO雙重性衍生更多的代理成本,並且更可能進行盈餘管理,因此會尋求其他管道來獲取資訊,減少利用 Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性來分析公司績效,公司管理階層也不會利用Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性來保障Non-GAAP盈餘攸關性,故在此情境下,Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性無法增強Non-GAAP盈餘對未來績效的預測能力。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The disclosure of financial information based on Non-GAAP measures (also inferred as Alternative performance measures) is becoming increasingly prevalent in the United States. The Non-GAAP measures allow management to discretionarily exclude some items to reflect company earnings, but the lack of consistent measures has raised concerns. There are numerous factors may affect the quality of Non-GAAP earnings, and previous literature has shown that comparability and board characteristics both influence earnings quality. However, there is relatively little research on the comparability of Non-GAAP earnings. Since the CEO is an insider, they directly influence the quality of financial information. The CEO duality also affects investors' judgment of the company's financial statements. Therefore, this research selects CEO duality, a significant factor influencing board independence, as the variable to investigate whether CEO duality strengthens or weakens the impact of Non-GAAP earnings comparability on the relevance of Non-GAAP earnings to future performance.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued regulatory guidelines to enhance oversight of Non-GAAP earnings measurements in 2003. Therefore, this research selects data from U.S. companies between 2003 and 2021, including GAAP earnings, Non-GAAP earnings, and CEO duality. The study refers to methodology from De Franco et al. (2011) for quantifying the comparability of GAAP earnings and Non-GAAP earnings. The results indicate that the comparability of Non-GAAP earnings positively affects the relevance of Non-GAAP earnings. However, CEO duality weakens this positive effect. Investors anticipate that CEO duality generates higher agency costs and is more likely to result in earnings management. Consequently, they seek other information sources and reduce reliance on Non-GAAP earnings comparability for analyzing company performance. This finding emphasizes that CEO duality will negatively affect the decision-usefulness of Non-GAAP earnings, thereby weakening the degree of influence of Non-GAAP earnings comparability on the positive relationship between Non-GAAP earnings and future earnings performance. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-06-14T16:05:38Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-06-14T16:05:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 I
中文摘要 II 英文摘要 III 目次 V 表次 VI 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究背景與動機 1 第二節 研究貢獻 4 第三節 研究架構 6 第二章 文獻回顧 8 第一節 可比較性與未來績效之攸關性 8 第二節 NON-GAAP盈餘 10 第三節 CEO雙重性與NON-GAAP盈餘 12 第三章 假說發展 14 第四章 研究方法與設計 18 第一節 可比較性之定義與計算 18 第二節 實證模型與變數衡量 20 第三節 樣本選取與資料蒐集 23 第五章 實證結果與分析 25 第一節 敘述統計 25 第二節 實證結果 30 第三節 穩健性測試 38 第六章 研究結果與建議 76 參考文獻 78 附錄 82 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | Non-GAAP盈餘可比較性對攸關性之影響-以CEO雙重性對未來績效影響為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Does Non-GAAP Earnings Comparability Better Enhance Relevance? Implication of The Moderating Role of CEO Duality to Future Performance | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | 尤琳蕙 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.coadvisor | Lin-Hui Yu | en |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 林純央;張窈菱;陳漢鐘;羅勝議 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chun-Yang Lin;Yao-Ling Chang;Han-Chung Chen;Sheng-Yi Lo | en |
dc.subject.keyword | Non-GAAP盈餘,可比較性,攸關性,CEO雙重性,代理問題,未來績效, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Non-GAAP earnings,Comparability,Relevance,CEO Duality,Agency Problem,Future Earnings Performance, | en |
dc.relation.page | 89 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401153 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-06-13 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 會計學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 會計學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。