請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92691
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 王衍智 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Yan-Zhi Wang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 蔡晴芝 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Ching-Chih Tsai | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-06-05T16:07:46Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-06-06 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-06-05 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-06-03 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Mitton, T. (2002). A cross-firm analysis of the impact of corporate governance on the East Asian financial crisis. Journal of financial economics, 64(2), 215-241
Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics, 51(3), 371.406. Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2000). Tunneling. American economic review, 90(2), 22.27. Joh, S. W. (2003). Corporate governance and firm profitability: evidence from Korea before the economic crisis. Journal of financial Economics, 68(2), 287-322. Daines, R. M., Gow, I. D., & Larcker, D. F. (2010). Rating the ratings: How good are commercial governance ratings?. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(3), 439-461. Price, R., Román, F. J., & Rountree, B. (2011). The impact of governance reform on performance and transparency. Journal of financial economics, 99(1), 76-96. Liu, C., Qing L., & Yu E. L., (2022). Corporate transparency and firm value: does market competition play an external governance role? Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, 2699. Millar, C. C., Eldomiaty, T. I., Choi, C. J., & Hilton, B. (2005). Corporate governance and institutional transparency in emerging markets. Journal of business ethics, 59, 163.174. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial management, 101.112. Vafeas, N. (1999). Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of financial economics, 53(1), 113.142. Singh, M., & Davidson III, W. N. (2003). Agency costs, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of banking & finance, 27(5), 793.816. Vitaliano, D. F. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and labor turnover. Corporate Governance: The international journal of business in society, 10(5), 563.573. Calomiris, C. W., & Carlson, M. (2016). Corporate governance and risk management at unprotected banks: National banks in the 1890s. Journal of financial economics, 119(3), 512.532. Bebchuk, L. A., & Fried, J. M. (2003). Executive compensation as an agency problem. Journal of economic perspectives, 17(3), 71.92. Lööf, H., Sahamkhadam, M., & Stephan, A. (2022). Is Corporate Social Responsibility investing a free lunch? The relationship between ESG, tail risk, and upside potential of stocks before and during the COVID-19 crisis. Finance Research Letters, 46, 102499. Diemont, D., Moore, K., & Soppe, A. (2016). The downside of being responsible: Corporate social responsibility and tail risk. Journal of business ethics, 137(2), 213.229. Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381. Kim, Y., Li, H., & Li, S. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 43, 1.13. Chen, J., Hong, H., & Stein, J. C. (2001). Forecasting crashes: Trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. Journal of financial Economics, 61(3), 345-381. Easley, D., & O''hara, M. (1987). Price, trade size, and information in securities markets. Journal of Financial economics, 19(1), 69-90. Admati, A. R., & Pfleiderer, P. (1988). A theory of intraday patterns: Volume and price variability. The review of financial studies, 1(1), 3.40. Heins, A. J., & Allison, S. L. (1966). Some factors affecting stock price variability. The Journal of Business, 39(1), 19-23. Hashemijoo, M., Mahdavi Ardekani, A., & Younesi, N. (2012). The impact of dividend policy on share price volatility in the Malaysian stock market. Journal of business studies quarterly, 4(1). Shah, S. A., & Noreen, U. (2016). Stock price volatility and role of dividend policy: Empirical evidence from Pakistan. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 461.472. Hussainey, K., Mgbame, C. O., & Chijoke‐Mgbame, A. M. (2011). Dividend policy and share price volatility: UK evidence. The Journal of risk finance, 12(1), 57-68. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92691 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 本研究旨在探討1980年至2021年間台灣上市公司的資訊透明度、董事會、持股、競爭力、薪酬等五大公司治理構面對股價尾端風險的影響。研究結果顯示,資訊透明度、持股、競爭力、薪酬等公司治理面向與股價尾端風險呈現正相關,即公司在這些方面表現越好,其股價尾端風險越低。然而,董事會的治理表現與股價尾端風險呈負相關,意味著董事會治理表現越好,股價尾端風險反而越高。此外,分年度分析顯示資訊透明度、董事會的係數逐年由正轉負,而持股、薪酬的係數逐年轉為正顯著。根據研究結果,台灣企業應更注重持股、薪酬等公司治理表現,以降低股票尾端風險,至於董事會治理表現,企業應審慎考慮其對股價尾端風險的影響,並探索可能的原因以制定合適的策略。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | This study aims to explore the impact of five major corporate governance dimensions—Transparency, Director, Ownership, Competition, and Compensation—on the tail risk of stock prices of listed companies in Taiwan from 1980 to 2021. The results show that Transparency, Ownership, Competition, and Compensation are positively correlated with the tail risk of stock prices, indicating that better performance in these areas is associated with lower tail risks. However, Director is negatively correlated with the tail risk of stock prices, suggesting that better board governance is associated with higher tail risks. Additionally, the annual analysis reveals that the coefficients for Transparency and Director have shifted from positive to negative over the years, while those for Ownership and Compensation have become significantly positive. Based on these findings, Taiwanese enterprises should pay more attention to governance performance in Ownership and Compensation to reduce stock tail risks. As for Director, companies should carefully consider its impact on tail risk and explore potential reasons to develop appropriate strategies. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-06-05T16:07:46Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-06-05T16:07:46Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 論文口試委員審定書 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 目次 iv 表次 v 第一章、緒論 1 1.1 研究動機與目的 1 第二章、文獻回顧與假說 4 2.1 文獻回顧 4 2.2 研究假說 8 第三章、資料與研究方法 10 3.1 樣本選擇 10 3.2 變數定義 10 3.3 研究方法 14 第四章、實證結果 17 4.1 敘述統計量 17 4.2 迴歸分析 18 第五章、結論 22 參考文獻 24 附錄 27 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 公司治理與股價尾端風險管理:以台灣上市公司為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Corporate Governance and Stock Price Tail Risk Management: Insights from Taiwan's Listed Firms | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 何耕宇;劉心才 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Keng-Yu Ho;Hsin-Tsai Liu | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 公司治理,資訊透明度,董事會,持股,競爭力,薪酬,股價尾端風險, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | corporate governance,transparency,director,ownership,competition,compensation,stock tail risk, | en |
dc.relation.page | 42 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202401073 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-06-03 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 財務金融學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 財務金融學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 627.83 kB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。