Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 管理學院
  3. 國際企業學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92644
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor何筱文zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorHsiao-Wen Hoen
dc.contributor.author曾小珍zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorXiao-Zhen Zengen
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-27T16:07:19Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-28-
dc.date.copyright2024-05-27-
dc.date.issued2024-
dc.date.submitted2024-05-14-
dc.identifier.citation英文文獻
Abualoush, S., Bataineh, K., & Alrowwad, A. A. (2018). The role of knowledge management process and intellectual capital as intermediary variables between knowledge management infrastructure and organization performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 13, 279-309.
Adel Odeh, A. H., Ammar, A., & Tareq, A. O. (2021). The mediation role of the organizational memory in the relationship between knowledge capturing and learning organization. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1), 1924933.
Ahmad, F., & Karim, M. (2019). Impacts of knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Journal of workplace learning, 31(3), 207-230.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, 107-136.
Alavi, Maryam, and Dorothy E. Leidner. "Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues." MIS quarterly (2001): 107-136.
Almahamid, S. M., Al-Jayyousi, O. R., Alalawi, A. I., & AlQarny, A. S. (2021). Knowledge management processes and service innovation: Key insights from Saudi International Airports. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, 18(04), 2150014.
Argote, Linda, and Paul Ingram. "Knowledge transfer: A basis for competitive advantage in firms." Organizational behavior and human decision processes 82.1 (2000): 150-169.
Azeem, M., Ahmed, M., Haider, S., & Sajjad, M. (2021). Expanding competitive advantage through organizational culture, knowledge sharing and organizational innovation. Technology in Society, 66, 101635.
Bashir, M., & Farooq, R. (2019). The synergetic effect of knowledge management and business model innovation on firm competence: A systematic review. International Journal of Innovation Science, 11(3), 362-387.
Bashir, Makhmoor, and Rayees Farooq. "The synergetic effect of knowledge management and business model innovation on firm competence: A systematic review." International Journal of Innovation Science 11.3 (2019): 362-387.
Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Leidner, D. E. (2008). Knowledge management: An evolutionary view (Vol. 12). ME Sharpe.
Castaneda, D. I., & Cuellar, S. (2020). Knowledge sharing and innovation: A systematic review. Knowledge and Process Management, 27(3), 159-173.
Chen, Chung-Jen, and Jing-Wen Huang. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity." Journal of business research 62.1 (2009): 104-114.
Chen, Chung-Jen, and Jing-Wen Huang. "Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance—The mediating role of knowledge management capacity." Journal of business research 62.1 (2009): 104-114.
Cohen, Wesley M., and Daniel A. Levinthal. "Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation." Administrative science quarterly (1990): 128-152.
Cope, Jason, and Gerald Watts. "Learning by doing–an exploration of experience, critical incidents and reflection in entrepreneurial learning." International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research 6.3 (2000): 104-124.
Dahiya, R., Le, S., Ring, J. K., & Watson, K. (2022). Big data analytics and competitive advantage: the strategic role of firm-specific knowledge. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(2), 175-193.
Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge management in theory and practice. Elsevier/Butterworth Heinemann.
De Wit-de Vries, E., Dolfsma, W. A., van der Windt, H. J., & Gerkema, M. P. (2019). Knowledge transfer in university–industry research partnerships: a review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44, 1236-1255.
del Rosario Pérez-Salazar, M., Aguilar Lasserre, A. A., Cedillo-Campos, M. G., & Hernández González, J. C. (2017). The role of knowledge management in supply chain management: A literature review. Journal of industrial Engineering and Management (JIEM), 10(4), 711-788.
Eucker, T. (2007). Maintaining levels of expertise at Intel. Knowledge Management Review, 10(3), 28.
Eucker, T. R. (2007). UNDERSTANDING THE IMPACT OF TACIT KNOWLEDGE LOSS:" In the next How can organizations combat the knowledge loss they''re facing? What percentage of the experience of these retirees can you expect to" capture"?. Knowledge Management Review, 10(1), 10.
Fai Pun, K., & Nathai‐Balkissoon, M. (2011). Integrating knowledge management into organisational learning: A review of concepts and models. The Learning Organization, 18(3), 203-223.
Fang, Y. C., Ren, Y. H., Chen, J. Y., Chin, T., Yuan, Q., & Lin, C. L. (2021). Inclusive leadership and career sustainability: mediating roles of supervisor developmental feedback and thriving at work. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 671663.
Fernandez, Irma Becerra, Avelino Gonzalez, and Rajiv Sabherwal. "Knowledge Management–Challenges, Solutions and Technologies." Ney Jersey: Pearson Education (2004).
Ganguly, A., Talukdar, A., & Chatterjee, D. (2019). Evaluating the role of social capital, tacit knowledge sharing, knowledge quality and reciprocity in determining innovation capability of an organization. Journal of knowledge management, 23(6), 1105-1135.
Ghobadi, S. (2015). What drives knowledge sharing in software development teams: A literature review and classification framework. Information & Management, 52(1), 82-97.
Goldman, J., Cavazos, J., Heddy, B. C., & Pugh, K. J. (2021). Emotions, values, and engagement: Understanding motivation of first-generation college students. Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology.
Hamel, Gary, and C. K. Prahalad. "Strategic intent." Mckinsey quarterly 1 (1990): 36-61.
Hamilton, A. B., & Finley, E. P. (2019). Qualitative methods in implementation research: An introduction. Psychiatry research, 280, 112516.
Hatami, Afsoun, Robert D. Galliers, and Jimmy Huang. "Exploring the impacts of knowledge (re) use and organizational memory on the effectiveness of strategic decisions: a longitudinal case study." 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the. IEEE, 2003.
Inkpen, Andrew C., and Mary M. Crossan. "Believing is seeing: Joint ventures and organization learning." Journal of management Studies 32.5 (1995): 595-618.
Joshi, Kshiti D., Saonee Sarker, and Suprateek Sarker. "Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes." Decision Support Systems 43.2 (2007): 322-335.
Joshi, Kshiti D., Saonee Sarker, and Suprateek Sarker. "Knowledge transfer within information systems development teams: Examining the role of knowledge source attributes." Decision Support Systems 43.2 (2007): 322-335.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge creating. New York, 304.
Ouakouak, M. L., & Ouedraogo, N. (2019). Fostering knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization: The impact of organizational commitment and trust. [Knowledge sharing and knowledge utilization] Business Process Management Journal, 25(4), 757-779. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-05-2017-0107
Polanyi, Michael. "The logic of tacit inference." Philosophy 41.155 (1966): 1-18.
Ryu, Chungsuk, et al. "Knowledge acquisition via three learning processes in enterprise information portals: Learning-by-investment, learning-by-doing, and learning-from-others." Mis Quarterly (2005): 245-278.
Ryu, Chungsuk, et al. "Knowledge acquisition via three learning processes in enterprise information portals: Learning-by-investment, learning-by-doing, and learning-from-others." Mis Quarterly (2005): 245-278.
Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. The coding manual for qualitative researchers, 1-440.
Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. H. (2023). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. Taylor & Francis.
Shepherd, D. A., & Gruber, M. (2021). The lean startup framework: Closing the academic–practitioner divide. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45(5), 967-998.
Singh, S., Thomas, N., & Numbudiri, R. (2021). Knowledge sharing in times of a pandemic: An intergenerational learning approach. Knowledge and Process Management, 28(2), 153-164.
Smith, Keith. What is the''knowledge economy''? Knowledge-intensive industries and distributed knowledge bases. Sydney, Australia: AEGIS, University of Western Sydney, 2000.
Stachová, K., Stacho, Z., Cagáňová, D., & Stareček, A. (2020). Use of digital technologies for intensifying knowledge sharing. Applied Sciences, 10(12), 4281.
Stewart, Kathy A., et al. "Confronting the assumptions underlying the management of knowledge: an agenda for understanding and investigating knowledge management." ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems 31.4 (2000): 41-53.
Swart, Juani, et al. "Why should I share my knowledge? A multiple foci of commitment perspective." Human Resource Management Journal 24.3 (2014): 269-289.
Tiwana, Amrit, and Balasubramaniam Ramesh. "A design knowledge management system to support collaborative information product evolution." Decision support systems 31.2 (2001): 241-262.
Von Krogh, Georg. "Care in knowledge creation." California management review 40.3 (1998): 133-153.

中文文獻
Banks, Marcus., and 林恩慧. 質性研究的視覺資料運用 / 班克斯(Marcus Banks)作 ; 林恩慧譯. 臺北縣永和市: 韋伯文化國際, 2010. Print.
David, Matthew., 王若馨, and Carole D. Sutton. 研究方法的基礎 / Matthew David, Carole D. Sutton作 ; 王若馨等譯. 初版. 台北縣永和市: 韋伯文化國際, 2007. Print.
Kerlinger, Fred N. (Fred Nichols) et al. 硏究方法 / Fred N. Kerlinger, Howard B. Lee著 ; 黃營杉,汪志堅編譯. 初版. 臺北市: 華泰, 2002. Print.
Koulopoulos, Thomas M., 陳琇玲, and Carl. Frappaolo。 知識管理,陳琇玲譯. 初版. 臺北市: 遠流, 2001. Print.
陳菊紅, 王能民, & 楊彤. (2002). 供應鏈中的知識管理. 科研管理, 23(1), 98-102.
陳一鳴. (2010). 供應鏈中成員企業間知識共享研究. 雲南社會科學, (2), 113-116.
黃正偉, & 楊豔妮. (2013). 基於知識圖譜的國內供應鏈管理研究分析. 中國流通經濟, 27(9), 42-47.
林東清。知識管理 = Knowledge management,2009。
劉開同. “知識管理視角下的供應鏈管理研究.” 物流科技/#/物流科技 [[wu Liu Ke Ji]], vol. 42, no. 1, 2019.
彭正銀, 黃曉芬, & 隋傑. (2019). 跨組織聯結網路, 資訊治理能力與創新績效. 南開管理評論, 22(4), 187-198.
張波. (2012). 供應鏈知識管理研究. 出國與就業(就業版).
張京敏, & 徐臨莉. (2015). 基於知識共用的關聯供應鏈企業間的合作博弈分析. 物流技術, 34(1), 209-211.
張紹勳. 研究方法 : 精華本 =. Research method / 張紹勳著. 二版. 臺中市: 滄海, 2007. Print.
沈厚才, 陶青, & 陳煜波. (2012). 供應鏈管理理論與方法. 中國管理科學, (1), 1-9.
葉勇. (2018). 基於知識圖譜分析的庫存管理研究. 資訊資源管理學報, 8(1), 104-封.

網絡資料
Knowledge Sharing 維基百科 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Knowledge_sharing#cite_note-5
英特爾 維基百科 https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E8%8B%B1%E7%89%B9%E5%B0%94
知識管理 https://zh.wikipedia.org/zh-tw/%E7%9F%A5%E8%AF%86%E7%AE%A1%E7%90%86
英特爾大危機 超微x86 CPU市占攀至31% https://ctee.com.tw/news/global/805521.html
Intel供應鏈企業社會責任報告Supply Chain Summary 2021-2022 Corporate Responsibility Report,2021 https://csrreportbuilder.intel.com/pdfbuilder/pdfs/CSR-2021-22-Full-Report.pdf
Intel 宣佈2023年度EPIC供應商計劃獲獎者 https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/newsroom/article/intel-announces-2023-supplier-award-recipients.html#gs.4py7wl
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92644-
dc.description.abstract在當今的知識經濟時代,組織管理知識的能力變得越來越重要。供應鏈中涉及原材料供應商、製造商、銷售商、運輸商、消費者等個節點,通過獲取、共享和運用存在企業內部和外部的顯性和隱性知識,使其產生協同價值,進而提高企業知識創新、提升核心競爭力與加強供應鏈管理的效能。

本論文以知識管理的循環和冰山理論搭建研究的主要框架,以研究企業的供應鏈中知識管理過程。研究框架包含:(1)接收與獲取知識(2) 轉化與學習知識(3)應用與管理知識,和(4)Eucker(2007)對英特爾知識管理的最佳實踐與應用的冰山理論為輔助參考,將冰山理論中的兩種知識:顯性知識和隱性知識,融入知識管理的三個過程中。本論文使用單一個案質性深度訪談法,訪談對象為英特爾台灣分公司全球供應鏈管理部門中的中階管理者,主要探討英特爾台灣全球供應鏈管理部門如何透過連結內外部供應商與客戶,進行跨單位與跨組織的溝通與協調,進而獲取、轉化與應用知識的過程。

本研究發現英特爾全球供應鏈管理部門使用全球型組織、精準複製、Top-Down的決策方法來獲取企業的內部顯性與隱性知識,同時作為橋樑的溝通角色和維護開發與剔除供應商等方法來接收與獲取外部顯性與隱性知識。此外,英特爾利用供應鏈國際研討會、供應商日、供應商會議等方法來轉化外部隱性知識至內部,同時使用公司內部分享會、跨企業分享會和管理者培訓系統來轉化與移轉內部隱性知識。最後英特爾使用供應商評分標準、NSI審核程序、Q&R供應商品質控管部門、數位化知識管理平台&Enterprise Wiki、部門知識梯度管理與權限管理來應用與管理知識。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractIn today's knowledge-based economy, the ability of an organization to manage knowledge is becoming increasingly important. The supply chain involves raw material suppliers, manufacturers, sellers, transporters, consumers and other nodes. By acquiring, sharing and utilizing the explicit and implicit knowledge that exists both inside and outside the enterprise, it generates synergistic value, which in turn improves the enterprise's knowledge innovation, enhances its core competitiveness, and strengthens the effectiveness of supply chain management.

In this thesis, the cycle of KM and the iceberg theory are used to build the main framework of the study in order to investigate the KM process in the supply chain of an organization. The research framework consists of (1) receiving and acquiring knowledge, (2) knowledge sharing and learning, (3) applying and managing knowledge, and (4) Eucker's (2007) Iceberg Theory of best practices and application of KM at Intel as a supporting reference to incorporate the two types of knowledge in the Iceberg Theory, explicit knowledge and tacit knowledge, into the three processes of KM. This paper uses a single qualitative in-depth interview with a middle-level manager in the Global Supply Chain Management (GSCM) department of Intel Taiwan to explore how the GSCM department acquires, transforms, and applies knowledge by linking internal and external suppliers and customers, and by conducting cross-unit and cross-organizational communication and coordination.

This study found that Intel's Global Supply Chain Management department uses global organization, Copy Exactly, and Top-Down decision-making to capture the company's internal explicit and tacit knowledge, as well as bridging communication roles and maintenance development and supplier elimination to receive and capture external explicit and tacit knowledge. In addition, Intel uses supply chain international seminars, supplier days, and supplier meetings to transfer external tacit knowledge internally, as well as in-house sharing sessions, cross-company sharing sessions, and manager training systems to convert and transfer internal tacit knowledge. Finally, Intel uses supplier scoring standards, NSI audit programs, Q&R supplier quality control department, digital knowledge management platform, such as Enterprise Wiki, departmental knowledge gradient management and authority management to apply and manage knowledge.
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-05-27T16:07:19Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-05-27T16:07:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents致謝 i
摘 要 ii
Abstract iii
圖 次 vii
表 次 viii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景 1
第二節 研究目的與問題 2
第二章 文獻探討 4
第一節 知識管理(Knowledge Management) 4
第二節 知識獲取(Knowledge Capture) 5
第三節 知識共享(Knowledge Sharing) 6
第四節 知識應用(Knowledge Application) 8
第五節 隱性知識與顯性知識 9
(Tacit Knowledge & Explicit Knowledge) 9
第六節 知識冰山理論(The Knowledge Iceberg) 11
第七節 研究架構 13
第三章 研究方法 14
第一節 研究工具 14
第二節 研究設計 16
第四章 研究發現 23
第一節 接收與獲取知識 24
第二節 轉化與學習知識 32
第三節 應用與管理知識 39
第五章 結論與建議 47
第一節 研究結論 47
第二節 研究貢獻 47
第三節 研究限制與未來研究建議 50
參考文獻 51
附錄一:訪談逐字稿 59
-
dc.language.isozh_TW-
dc.subject接收與獲取知識zh_TW
dc.subject應用與管理知識zh_TW
dc.subject知識冰山理論zh_TW
dc.subject隱性知識zh_TW
dc.subject顯性知識zh_TW
dc.subject知識管理zh_TW
dc.subject供應鏈知識管理zh_TW
dc.subject轉化與學習知識zh_TW
dc.subjectApplying and Managing Knowledgeen
dc.subjectSupply Chain Knowledge Managementen
dc.subjectKnowledge Managementen
dc.subjectExplicit Knowledgeen
dc.subjectTacit Knowledgeen
dc.subjectReceiving and Acquiring Knowledgeen
dc.subjectKnowledge Sharing and Learningen
dc.subjectKnowledge Iceberg Theoryen
dc.title研究供應鏈與知識管理的交集:以英特爾公司為例zh_TW
dc.titleA study of the intersection between supply chain and knowledge management: The case of Intel Corporationen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-2-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee簡睿哲;江藍龍zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeRui-Zhe Jian;Lan-Long Jiangen
dc.subject.keyword接收與獲取知識,轉化與學習知識,應用與管理知識,知識冰山理論,隱性知識,顯性知識,知識管理,供應鏈知識管理,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordReceiving and Acquiring Knowledge,Knowledge Sharing and Learning,Applying and Managing Knowledge,Knowledge Iceberg Theory,Tacit Knowledge,Explicit Knowledge,Knowledge Management,Supply Chain Knowledge Management,en
dc.relation.page82-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202300846-
dc.rights.note同意授權(限校園內公開)-
dc.date.accepted2024-05-14-
dc.contributor.author-college管理學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept國際企業學系-
dc.date.embargo-lift2029-04-09-
顯示於系所單位:國際企業學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-2.pdf
  未授權公開取用
1.91 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved