請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9261完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 胡志偉(Chih-Wei Hue) | |
| dc.contributor.author | Yu-Hsiang Tseng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 曾昱翔 | zh_TW |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-20T20:15:00Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2010-07-20 | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-05-20T20:15:00Z | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2009-07-20 | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.date.submitted | 2009-07-15 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | 王力（1954）。「中國現代語法」。香港：中華書局。
吳憲忠（2000）。「中文閱讀歷程的研究」（未發表之碩士論文）。中壢：中原大學心理學研究所。 胡志偉（1989）。中文詞的辨識歷程。「中華心理學刊」，31，33-39。 柯華葳、陳明蕾、廖家寧（2005）。詞頻、詞彙類型與眼球運動型態：來自篇章閱讀的證據。「中華心理學刊」，47，381-398。 高千惠、胡志偉、曾昱翔、羅明（2009）。從校稿失誤探討中文閱讀的單位。「中華心理學刊」，51，21-36。 翁永傑（2003）。「中文短文閱讀中的詞劣效果之探討」（未發表之碩士論文）。台南：成功大學心理學研究所。 陳烜之（1984）。閱讀中文時對部件偵測的歷程。「中華心理學刊」，26，29-34。 陳烜之（1987）。閱讀中文時的單字偵測歷程。「中華心理學刊」，29，45-50。 許嫚斯（2005）。「從詞劣現象探討中文的閱讀單位」（未發表之碩士論文）。台南：成功大學心理學研究所。 彭瑞元、陳振宇（2004）。「偶語易安、奇字難適」：探討中文讀者斷詞不一致之原因。「中華心理學刊」，46，49-55。 劉英茂、葉重新、王聯慧、張迎桂（1974）。詞單位對閱讀效率的影響。「中華心理學刊」，16，25-32。 鄭昭明（1981）。漢字認知的歷程。「中華心理學刊」，23，137-153。 蘇友瑞、劉英茂（1996）。中文的「詞優」與「字優」效果。「中華心理學刊」，38，11-30。 Adams, B. C., Clifton, C., & Mitchell, D. C. (1998). Lexical guidance in sentence processing? Pychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 265-270. Ashby, J., Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Rayner, K. (2006). Vowel processing during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 32, 416-424. Bai, X., Yan, G., Liversedge, S. P., Zang, C., & Rayner, K. (2008). Reading spaced and unspaced chinese text: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1277-1287. Binder, K. S., & Morris, R. K. (1995). Eye movements and lexical ambiguity resolution: Effects of prior encounter and discourse topic. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1-11. Binder, K. S., Pollatsek, A., & Rayner, K. (1999). Extraction of information to the left of the fixated word in reading. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1162-1172. Bock, K. (1990). Structure in language: Creating form in talk. American Pychologist, 45, 1221-1236. Calvo, M. G., & Castillo, M. D. (2009). Semantic word priming in the absence of eye fixations: Relative contributions of overt and covert attention. Pychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 51-56. Carpenter, P. A., & Just, M. A. (1983). What your eyes do while your mind is reading. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 275-307). New York: Academic Press. Cattell, J. M. (1886). The time it takes to see and name objects. Mind, 11, 63-65. Chen, J. Y. (1998). Word recognition during reading of Chinese sentences: Evidence from studying the word superiority effect. In A. Inhoff, J. Wang & H. C. Chen (Eds.), Reading Chinese script: A cognition analysis (pp. 239-256). N.J.: Erlbaum. Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic structures. The Hague: Mouton. Corcoran, D. W. J. (1966). An acoustic factor in letter cancellation. Nature, 210, 658. Drewnowski, A., & Healy, A. F. (1977). Detection errors on the and and: Evidence for reading units larger than word. Memory & Cognition, 5, 636-647. Drieghe, D., Brysbaert, M., Desmet, T., & De Baecke, C. (2004). Word skipping in reading: On the interplay of linguistic and visual factors. European Journal of Cognitive Pychology, 16, 79-103. Engbert, R., Nuthmann, A., Richter, E. M., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Swift: A dynamical model of saccade generation during reading. Pychological Review, 112, 777-813. Estes, Z., & Jones, L. L. (2009). Integrative priming occurs rapidly and uncontrollably during lexical processing. Journal of Experimental Pychology: General, 138, 112-130. Ferreira, F., Bailey, K. G. D., & Ferraro, V. (2002). Good-enough representations in language comprehension. Current Directions in Pychological Science, 11, 11-15. Greenberg, J. (1957). The nature and uses of linguistic typologies. International Journal of American Linguistics, 23, 68-77. Greenberg, S. N., Healy, A. F., Koriat, A., & Kreiner, H. (2004). The go model: A reconsideration of the role of structural units in guiding and organizing text on line. Pychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 428-433. Greenberg, S. N., & Koriat, A. (1991). The missing-letter effect for common function words depends on their linguistic function in the phrase. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1051-1061. Hadley, J. A., & Healy, A. F. (1991). When are reading units larger than the letter - refinement of the unitization reading model. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 17, 1062-1073. Healy, A. F. (1976). Detection errors on word the - evidence for reading units larger than letters. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2, 235-242. Healy, A. F. (1980). Proofreading errors on the word the - new evidence on reading units. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 45-57. Healy, A. F. (1981). Cognitive-processes in reading text. Cognition, 10, 119-126. Healy, A. F. (1994). Letter detection - a window to unitization and other cognitive-processes in reading text. Pychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 333-344. Healy, A. F., & Cunningham, T. F. (2004). Reading units that include interword spaces: Filling spaces around a letter can facilitate letter detection. Memory & Cognition, 32, 560-569. Healy, A. F., & Drewnowski, A. (1983). Investigating the boundaries of reading units - letter detection in misspelled words. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 9, 413-426. Healy, A. F., Oliver, W. L., & McNamara, T. P. (1987). Detecting letters in continuous text - effects of display size. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 13, 279-290. Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual-attention in saccadic eye-movements. Perception & Pychophysics, 57, 787-795. Hoosain, R. (1992). Pychological reality of the word in Chinese. In H. C. Chen & O. J. L. Tzeng (Eds.), Language processing in Chinese (pp. 111-130). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. Huang, J. T. (1979). Time-dependent separability hypothesis of Chinese words association. Acta Pychologica Taiwanica, 22, 41-48. Huey, E. B. (1968). The pychology and pedagogy of reading. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Original work published 1908) Inhoff, A. W. (1982). Parafoveal word perception - a further case against semantic preprocessing. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 8, 137-145. Inhoff, A. W., & Liu, W. M. (1998). The perceptual span and oculomotor activity during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 20-34. Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1980). Parafoveal word perception - a case against semantic preprocessing. Perception & Pychophysics, 27, 457-464. Juhasz, B. J., Liversedge, S. P., White, S. J., & Rayner, K. (2008). Eye movements and the use of parafoveal word length information in reading. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 1560-1579. Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading - from eye fixations to comprehension. Pychological Review, 87, 329-354. Kambe, G. (2004). Parafoveal during processing of prefixed words eye fixations in reading: Evidence against morphological influences on parafoveal preprocessing. Perception & Pychophysics, 66, 279-292. Koriat, A., & Greenberg, S. N. (1991). Syntactic control of letter detection: Evidence from English and Hebrew nonwords. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 1035-1050. Koriat, A., & Greenberg, S. N. (1994). The extraction of phrase structure during reading - evidence from letter detection errors. Pychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 345-356. Lee, H. W., Legge, G. E., & Ortiz, A. (2003). Is word recognition different in central and peripheral vision? Vision Research, 43, 2837-2846. Liu, W. M., Inhoff, A. W., Ye, Y., & Wu, C. L. (2002). Use of parafoveally visible characters during the reading of Chinese sentences. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28, 1213-1227. McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 1. An account of basic findings. Pychological Review, 88, 375-407. Moravcsik, J. E., & Healy, A. F. (1994). Does syntactic role affect letter detection? Paper presented at the the annual meeting of the sixty-fourth Rocky Mountain Pychological Association, Las Vegas, N. V. Moravcsik, J. E., & Healy, A. F. (1995). Effect of meaning on letter detection. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 21, 82-95. Prinzmetal, W. (1992). The word-superiority effect does not require a t-scope. Perception & Pychophysics, 51, 473-484. Rayner, K., Balota, D. A., & Pollatsek, A. (1986). Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. Canadian Journal of Pychology: Revue Canadienne De Pychologie, 40, 473-483. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1986). Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading - effects of word-frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity. Memory & Cognition, 14, 191-201. Rayner, K., & Duffy, S. A. (1988). On-line comprehension processes and eye movements during reading. In M. Daneman, G. E. MacKinnon & T. G. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 6, pp. 13-66). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Rayner, K., Inhoff, A. W., Morrison, R. E., Slowiaczek, M. L., & Bertera, J. H. (1981). Masking of foveal and parafoveal vision during eye fixations in reading. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 167-179. Rayner, K., Juhasz, B. J., & Pollatsek, A. (2005). Eye movements during reading. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell. Rayner, K., Li, X. S., Juhasz, B. J., & Yan, G. L. (2005). The effect of word predictability on the eye movements of chinese readers. Pychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 1089-1093. Rayner, K., Liversedge, S. P., White, S. J., & Vergilino-Perez, D. (2003). Reading disappearing text: Cognitive control of eye movements. Pychological Science, 14, 385-388. Rayner, K., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2003). Eye movements in reading: Models and data. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 507-526. Rayner, K., Well, A. D., & Pollatsek, A. (1980). Asymmetry of the effective visual-field in reading. Perception & Pychophysics, 27, 537-544. Reicher, G. (1969). Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Pychology: General, 81, 275-280. Reichle, E. D. (2006). Computational models of eye-movement control during reading: Theories of the 'Eye-mind' Link. Cognitive Systems Research, 7, 2-3. Saint-Aubin, J., & Klein, R. M. (2001). Influence of parafoveal processing on the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 318-334. Saint-Aubin, J., Klein, R. M., & Roy-Charland, A. (2003). Direct assessments of the processing time hypothesis for the missing-letter effect. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 1191-1210. Sun, F., Morita, M., & Stark, L. W. (1985). Comparative patterns of reading eye-movement in Chinese and English. Perception & Pychophysics, 37, 502-506. Tsai, J.-L., & McConkie, G. W. (2003). Where do Chinese readers send their eyes? In J. Hyona, R. Radach & H. Deubel (Eds.), The mind's eyes: Cognitive and applied aspects of eye movements (pp. 159-176). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers. Wang, S.-P., Tong, X.-H., Yang, J.-M., & Leng, Y. (2009). Semantic codes are obtained before word fixation in Chinese sentence reading: Evidence from eye-movements. Acta Pychologica Sinica, 41, 220-232. White, S. J., Bertram, R., & Hyona, J. (2008). Semantic processing of previews within compound words. Journal of Experimental Pychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34, 988-993. Yan, G., Tian, H., Bai, X., & Rayner, K. (2006). The effect of word and character frequency on the eye movements of Chinese readers. British Journal of Pychology, 97, 259-268. | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9261 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 本研究將探討中文反置詞的詞劣效果之心理歷程。過去研究認為，英文詞劣效果發生的機制牽涉早期的視覺辨識歷程，但是中文反置詞的詞劣效果應該來自於晚期的語義整合歷程。本研究使用二個實驗來驗證並進一步探討這個想法。實驗一操弄目標詞在文句中的預測性，如果反置詞的詞劣效果是發生在語義整合歷程，當目標詞的預測性低時，參與者就比較容易偵測到反置詞；相反的，當參與者偵測目標詞中的部件時，不管目標詞是高或低預測性，參與者偵測目標部件的偵測率應該不會受到影響。實驗結果與實驗預測相同，此實驗支持中文反置詞的詞劣效果和晚期的語義整合歷程有關。實驗二進一步探討反置詞的偵測機制與不同視野之間的關係。實驗二中，研究者藉由眼動儀來進行「移動視窗」的實驗，參與者必須在三種不同的呈現情境（全視野、視中央、視周圍）下閱讀，並且在閱讀時偵測三種目標（中文字部件、反置詞、形異音同的錯字）。本實驗的結果發現，視周圍的預先處理可以幫助參與者偵測到反置詞，意即讀者的視中央和視周圍都會提供訊息給語義整合歷程。本研究支持中文反置詞的詞劣效果是來自於語義整合歷程。本研究進一步討論語意整合歷程的本質，以及該歷程與偵測反置詞之間的關係。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The purpose of present study is to investigate the underlying mechanism of word
inferiority effect (WIE) when detecting position-transposed-characters (PTCs). Previous studies suggested English WIE was involved with visual recognition process, while Chinese WIE was involved with semantic integration process. This study used two experiments to further investigate this issue. Experiment 1 manipulated context predictability of targets (high, low), and target types (Chinese radicals, PTCs). If Chinese WIE was involved with semantic integration process, the detection rate should be higher when target predictability was low. On the contrary, detection rate of Chinese radical should not be affected by target predictability. Experiment results were consistent with the prediction. The results therefore suggested Chinese WIE was involved with semantic integration. Experiment 2 investigated the relationship between detection mechanism of PTCs and visual fields. Researcher performed Moving Window Paradigm with an eye tracker. In the experiment, participants would read sentences in 3 different display conditions (full, fovea only, parafovea only). While reading, participants needed to detect 3 different types of targets (Chinese radical, PTCs, substitution of phonological-similar character). Results showed the pre-process of PTCs in parafovea increased the detection rates. The results suggested that both fovea and parafovea provided information to semantic integration process. Present study supports that Chinese WIE is involved with semantic integration process. The nature of semantic integration process and how this process is relating to PTC detection are also discussed. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:15:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 ntu-98-R95227102-1.pdf: 585250 bytes, checksum: 5d70eb1ff6b586e253ed4c36186b0893 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 導論............................................ 1
第一節 與詞劣效果相關的閱讀理論...................... 2 第二節 閱讀的眼動研究............................... 14 第三節 中文的閱讀研究............................... 18 第二章 實驗一......................................... 26 第一節 實驗方法..................................... 26 第二節 結果......................................... 29 第三節 討論......................................... 32 第三章 實驗二......................................... 36 第一節 實驗方法..................................... 39 第二節 結果......................................... 43 第三節 討論......................................... 46 第四章 綜合討論....................................... 49 第五章 參考資料....................................... 56 第六章 附錄........................................... 64 第一節 實驗一刺激材料............................... 64 第二節 實驗二刺激材料............................... 70 | |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | |
| dc.title | 中文詞劣效果研究：偵測反置詞的認知歷程 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Chinese Word Inferiority Effect: The Cognitive Mechanism
Underlying Position-Transposed-Characters Detection | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 97-2 | |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 鄭谷苑,顏乃欣 | |
| dc.subject.keyword | 詞劣效果,反置詞,語義整合,眼動,移動視窗,視中央,視周圍, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | word inferiority effect,position-transposed-characters,semantic integration,eye movements,moving window paradigm,fovea,parafovea, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 84 | |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | |
| dc.date.accepted | 2009-07-15 | |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 心理學研究所 | zh_TW |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 心理學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-98-1.pdf | 571.53 kB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。