請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92611完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張國暉 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Kuo-Hui Cheng | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 徐凡祐 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Fan-Yu Hsu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-05-10T16:05:48Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-05-11 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-05-10 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-04-29 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 壹、中文
方俊德 (2023)。臺灣淨零碳排路徑初探。臺灣經濟研究月刊，46(1)，13–20。 王宣智、林品安 (2016)。2025臺灣製造業-藉由形塑未來工作與生產模式來探尋潛力技術。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。 今周刊、中華民國全國中小企業總會、中華開發金控 (2022年1月12日)。300家中小企業深度調查。https://esg.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/180689/post/202301120008 王偉鴻 (2019)。德國製造業數位轉型政策治理與發展策略。臺灣經濟研究月刊，42(10)，29–37。 王偉鴻 (2023)。英國政府引領企業投資節能減碳的政策做法。臺灣經濟研究月刊，46(7)，30–37。https://doi.org/10.29656/TERM.202307_46(7).0005 王健全、林嘉慧、林柏君、彭素玲、賴偉文、陳穎萱 (2022)。2022年中小企業白皮書。經濟部中小企業處，41-43、47、110-148。 王健全、林嘉慧、彭素玲、黃勢璋、洪志銘、賴偉文、蔡鳳凰、簡淑綺、陳穎萱（2023）。2023年中小企業白皮書。經濟部中小企業處，236。 立法院（2020年10月1日）。經濟部所屬工業局、國際貿易局、標準檢驗局及智慧財產局110年度單位預算評估報告。https://www.ly.gov.tw/Pages/Detail.aspx?nodeid=44164&pid=202879 行政院 (2019年9月11日)。加速推動行動支付普及。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/5A8A0CB5B41DA11E/84ca877a-f946-4684-a19d-732a351dc448 行政院 (2023年2月9日)。陳揆：因應疫後振興 全力協助國內產業及中小企業升級轉型。https://www.ey.gov.tw/Page/9277F759E41CCD91/bc6b17b3-b02d-4d56-af03-1f8e4a4d7195 行政院國家永續發展委員會（2009年9月）。永續發展政策綱領。3。https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/_ofu/download/about/%E6%B0%B8%E7%BA%8C%E8%83%BD%E6%BA%90%E6%94%BF%E7%AD%96%E7%B6%B1%E9%A0%98.pdf 行政院國家永續發展委員會（2022）。110年國家永續發展年報。1。https://ncsd.ndc.gov.tw/Fore/nsdn/implement2/annualReport 李世珍（2020）。後疫時代中小企業數位轉型之契機。國土與公共治理季刊，8(4)，57-59。 李俊達、黃朝盟 (2013)。臺灣地方政府永續發展政策調查結果分析。競爭力評論，16，47–81。 社團法人中華民國全國中小企業總會（2022）。經濟部中小企業處111年度雲世代小微企業數位轉型創新服務計畫期末報告（A31112601），192、200。 李濬 (2009)。再生能源產業發展政策研究-以市場失靈觀點［未出版之碩士論文］。國立中央大學。 林泉興、王竣弘 (2023年4月24日)。 友善環境 創造卓越／碳權交易市場。經濟日報。 https://money.udn.com/money/story/122331/7120439 周桂田 (2017)。氣候變遷社會學: 高碳社會及其轉型挑戰。國立臺灣大學出版中心。 拓墣產業研究院（2022）。經濟部中小企業處111年度雲世代小微企業數位轉型創新服務計畫產業別數位轉型路徑報告（A31112601），37。 財政部統計處（2022年2月23日）。110 年我國出進口貿易概況，3。 https://service.mof.gov.tw/public/Data/statistic/bulletin/111/110%E5%B9%B4%E6%88%91%E5%9C%8B%E5%87%BA%E9%80%B2%E5%8F%A3%E8%B2%BF%E6%98%93%E6%A6%82%E6%B3%81.pdf 徐健銘、張國暉、翁渝婷、梁曉昀 (2023)。臺中向上市場塑膠袋減量的轉型方案：從策略利基管理途徑檢視。思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，61(1)，181-185。 徐瑋成 (2022)。臺灣淨零轉型與能源發展之課題與挑戰。臺灣經濟研究月刊，45(4)，35–42。 梁賓先、楊基載(2022年10月28日)。淺談電線電纜業的物聯網智慧製造。台灣雲端物聯網產業協會【雲協技術專家專欄】。http://www.twcloud.org.tw/xmdoc/cont?xsmsid=0I249594489957008833&sid=0M301697660503722920 張國暉 (2019)。從政府治理到轉型研究及風險治理：來自系統、科技與頑強問題的新刺激。思與言：人文與社會科學期刊，57(3)，233–285。 張國暉（2023）。轉型管理的興起、定位及新治理構思：自成一家的演變及挑戰。公共行政學報，64，79-116。 張聖傑（2014年1月）。跨太平洋戰略經濟夥伴協定(TPP)對台灣電線電纜產業影響。金屬工業研究發展中心。https://www.mirdc.org.tw/FileDownLoad/IndustryNews/2015122995832308.pdf 黃煒軒、黃浩珉 (2023年1月12日)。300家中小企業深度調查 面對大廠來勢洶洶的淨零壓力，臺灣卻仍未準備好！問題出在哪？。今周刊。https://esg.businesstoday.com.tw/article/category/180689/post/202301120008 陳怡如(2023)。一德金屬 全力投資減碳未來。工業技術與資訊(Industrial Technology)，372，24-25。 陳慧蓉（2023年2月15日）。擁抱數位轉型 營運事半功倍。工商時報。https://view.ctee.com.tw/processing/48474.html 曾于哲(2022年12月26日)。臺灣「2050 淨零碳排路徑圖」要如何實現。安永臺灣。https://www.ey.com/zh_tw/climate-change-sustainability-services/how-taiwan-head-to-2050-net-zero 游良堯 (2022)。世界主要國家淨零排放政策推動做法與借鏡。臺灣經濟研究月刊，45(4)，19–27。https://doi.org/10.29656/TERM.202204_45(4).0004 經濟部 (2023年3月29日)。立法院第 10 屆第 7 會期經濟委員會第 8 次全體委員會議經濟部業務報告。https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/content/ContentMenu.aspx?menu_id=32795 經濟部統計處（2023）。109~112年臺灣零售業網路銷售額及占比。經濟統計數據分析系統。https://dmz26.moea.gov.tw/GA/visualize/VisDashboard.aspx?d=25 葉俊榮 (2005)。轉型與發展: 臺灣 21 世紀議程-國家永續發展願景與策略綱領。研考雙月刊，29(5)，6–18。 賈集成 (2021)。電子資訊業數位轉型關鍵成功因素之探討［未出版之碩士論文］。國立中央大學。 楊惠嵐 (2021)。疫情時代，中小企業智慧創新策略。臺灣經濟研究月刊，44(8)，19–26。https://doi.org/10.29656/TERM.202108_44(8).0004 鄭又豪 (2021)。數字轉型與人才培育策略之研究 －以X公司為探討物件［未出版之碩士論文］。收入 臺灣大學臺大_復旦EMBA境外專班學位論文 (期 2021年)。https://doi.org/10.6342/NTU202104504 鄭乃瑜、洪志銘 (2022)。數位行銷趨勢下中小企業之因應。經濟前瞻，199，126–132。 蔣佳璘 (2023年 9月27日)。伸泰國際電線電纜智能化升級 奠定產業未來。經濟日報。https://money.udn.com/money/story/5723/7469274 劉明德、徐玉珍 (2012)。臺灣亟需有遠見的再生能源政策與做法—德國經驗的啟示。公共行政學報，43，127–150。 劉哲良 (2023年7月26日)。碳權的內涵與交易所的定位及功能。工商時報。 https://view.ctee.com.tw/esg/51239.html 潘淑滿 (2022)。質性研究：理論與應用(12、21)。心理。 歐宜佩 (2020)。從新加坡 Service 4.0 看數位轉型發展趨勢。經濟前瞻，189，84–90。 戴彗紋 (2023)。接軌世界啟動淨零戰略的關鍵重點議題。臺灣經濟研究月刊， 46(7)，14–20。https://doi.org/10.29656/TERM.202307_46(7).0003 總統府（2023年3月25日）。中央政府疫後強化經濟與社會韌性及全民共享經濟成果特別預算案審查報告（修正本）。9-11。https://www.president.gov.tw/Page/294/48734 羅良慧、林海珍、黃永慧、張詩雅、黃郁棻 (2022)。零碳永續願景下之政策倡議與議題觀測。財團法人國家實驗研究院科技政策研究與資訊中心。7-18。 貳、英文 Adamides, E. D., & Mouzakitis, Y. (2009). Industrial ecosystems as technological niches. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(2), 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.003 Afolabi, H., Ram, R., Hussainey, K., Nandy, M. and Lodh, S. (2023). Exploration of small and medium entities'' actions on sustainability practices and their implications for a greener economy. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(4), 655-681. https://doi.org/10.1108/JAAR-09-2022-0252 Andersen, A. D., Frenken, K., Galaz, V., Kern, F., Klerkx, L., Mouthaan, M., L. Piscicelli, J.B. Schor & Vaskelainen, T. (2021). On digitalization and sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 41, 96-98. Ash, C. G., & Burn, J. M. (2003). Assessing the benefits from e-business transformation through effective enterprise management. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(4), 297–308. Avelino, F., & Grin, J. (2017). Beyond deconstruction. A reconstructive perspective on sustainability transition governance. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 22, 15–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.07.003 Bai, C., Quayson, M., & Sarkis, J. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic digitization lessons for sustainable development of micro-and small- enterprises. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 1989–2001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.04.035 Barrios, J. M., Hochberg, Y. V., & Yi, H. (2023). The cost of convenience: Ridehailing and traffic fatalities. Journal of Operations Management, 69(5), 823–855. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1221 BBC. (2021, November 13). COP26：氣候變化、淨零排放目標和達到目標的七條路. https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/world-59252590 Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., & Rickne, A. (2008). Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: A scheme of analysis. Research Policy, 37(3), 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.12.003 Berman, S. J. (2012). Digital transformation: Opportunities to create new business models. Strategy & leadership, 40(2), 16–24. Besson, P., & Rowe, F. (2012). Strategizing information systems-enabled organizational transformation: A transdisciplinary review and new directions. The journal of strategic information systems, 21(2), 103–124. Bianchini, S., Damioli, G., & Ghisetti, C. (2023). The environmental effects of the “twin” green and digital transition in European regions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 84(4), 877–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00741-7 Bienhaus, F., & Haddud, A. (2018). Procurement 4.0: Factors influencing the digitisation of procurement and supply chains. Business Process Management Journal, 24(4), 965–984. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-06-2017-0139 Bouckaert, S., Pales, A. F., McGlade, C., Remme, U., Wanner, B., Varro, L., D’Ambrosio, D., & Spencer, T. (2021). Net zero by 2050: A roadmap for the global energy sector. International Energy Agency. Brundtland, G. H. & Khalid, M. (1987). World Commission on Environment and Development: Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, New York. Cahapay, M. (2021). Kirkpatrick model: Its limitations as used in higher education evaluation. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 8(1), 135-144. Caniëls, M. C. J., & Romijn, H. A. (2008). Actor networks in Strategic Niche Management: Insights from social network theory. Futures, 40(7), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2007.12.005 Cennamo, C., & Santalo, J. (2013). Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets. Strategic management journal, 34(11), 1331. Cha, K. J., Hwang, T., & Gregor, S. (2015). An integrative model of IT-enabled organizational transformation: A multiple case study. Management Decision, 53(8), 1755–1770. Chatterjee, D., Grewal, R., & Sambamurthy, V. (2002). Shaping up for e-commerce: Institutional enablers of the organizational assimilation of web technologies. MIS quarterly, 26(2), 65–89. Chaudhry, N. I., & Amir, M. (2020). From institutional pressure to the sustainable development of firm: Role of environmental management accounting implementation and environmental proactivity. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3542–3554. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2595 Chen, L., Shaheer, N., Yi, J., & Li, S. (2019). The international penetration of ibusiness firms: Network effects, liabilities of outsidership and country clout. Journal of International Business Studies, 50, 175. Christensen, C., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. (2007). Disruptive Innovation for Social Change. Harvard business review, 84, 94–101, 163. Clapp, J. (2021). The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system. Nature Food, 2(6), 404-408. Coles, A. M., Piterou, A., & Sentić, A. (2018). Is small really beautiful? A review of the concept of niches in innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(8), 895–908. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2017.1408907 Commission of the European Communities (2002, May 6). Communication from the Commission on Impact Assessment. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2002:0276:FIN:EN:PDF Costa, J., & Matias, J. C. (2020). Open innovation 4.0 as an enhancer of sustainable innovation ecosystems. Sustainability, 12(19), 8112. Cui, M., & Pan, S. L. (2015). Developing focal capabilities for e-commerce adoption: A resource orchestration perspective. Information & Management, 52(2), 200–209. Culot, G., Nassimbeni, G., Orzes, G., & Sartor, M. (2020). Behind the definition of Industry 4.0: Analysis and open questions. International Journal of Production Economics, 226, 107617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107617 Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge. Depaoli, P., & Za, S. (2013). Towards the Redesign of e-Business Maturity Models for SMEs. In R. Baskerville, M. De Marco, & P. Spagnoletti (Eds.), Designing Organizational Systems: An Interdisciplinary Discourse. 285–300. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33371-2_15 Dirven, J. G. P., Rotmans, J., & Verkaik, A. P. (2002). Samenleving in transitie: Een vernieuwend gezichtspunt. Ministerie LNV, Den Haag, ICIS, Maastricht, Innovatie Netwerk Groene Ruimte en Agrocluster, Den Haag. Ditlev-Simonsen, C. D. (2022). A Guide to Sustainable Corporate Responsibility: From Theory to Action. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88203-7 Dóci, G., Vasileiadou, E., & Petersen, A. C. (2015). Exploring the transition potential of renewable energy communities. Futures, 66, 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2015.01.002 Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the Sustainable Corporation: Win-Win-Win Business Strategies for Sustainable Development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165746 European Commission (2021, March 19). EU countries commit to leading the green digital transformation. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/news/eu-countries-commit-leading-green-digital-transformation European Commission (2023, April 20). Destination Earth (DestinE). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/destination-earth European Commission (n.d.). The digital Europe Programme. https://commission.europa.eu/funding-tenders/find-funding/eu-funding-programmes/digital-europe-programme_en Faik, I., Barrett, M. I., & Oborn, E. (2020). How Information Technology Matters in Societal Change: An Affordance-Based Institutional Perspective. MIS Q., 44(3), 1359-1390. DOI:10.25300/MISQ/2020/14193 Fischer, L.-B., & Newig, J. (2016). Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: A systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability, 8(5), 476. Fitzpatrick, M., Gill, I., Libarikian, A., Smaje, K., & Zemmel, R. (2020, April 20). The digital-led recovery from COVID-19: Five questions for CEOs. McKinsey Digital. https://www. mckinsey. com/business-functions/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-digital-led-recovery-from-covid-19-five-questions-for-ceos Fletcher, G., & Griffiths, M. (2020). Digital transformation during a lockdown. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102185.1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102185 Fouquet, R. (2017). Make low-carbon energy an integral part of the knowledge economy. Nature, 551(7682). ISSN 0028-0836. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-017-07509-w Fouquet, R., & Hippe, R. (2022). Twin transitions of decarbonisation and digitalisation: A historical perspective on energy and information in European economies. Energy Research & Social Science, 91, 102736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102736 Fraga-Lamas, P., Lopes, S. I., & Fernández-Caramés, T. M. (2021). Green IoT and edge AI as key technological enablers for a sustainable digital transition towards a smart circular economy: An industry 5.0 use case. Sensors, 21(17), 5745. https://doi.org/10.3390/s21175745 Geels, F.W. (2004). From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-Technical Systems: Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015 Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8 Geels, F. W., Pinkse, J., & Zenghelis, D. (2021). Productivity opportunities and risks in a transformative, low-carbon and digital age. Working Paper No. 009, The Productivity Institute. Geels, F. W., Sovacool, B. K., Schwanen, T., & Sorrell, S. (2017). The Socio-Technical Dynamics of Low-Carbon Transitions. Joule, 1(3), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.018 Gerring, J. (2007). Case Study Research: Principles and Practices, Cambridge University Press. Gliedt, T., Berkhout, T., Parker, P., & Doucet, J. (2010). Voluntary environmental decision making in firms: Green electricity purchases and the role of champions. International Journal of Business Environment, 3(3), 308–328. Gong, C., & Ribiere, V. (2021). Developing a unified definition of digital transformation. Technovation, 102, 102217, 12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.102217 Grau, T. (2014). Responsive feed-in tariff adjustment to dynamic technology development. Energy Economics, 44, 36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2014.03.015 Green, K. (1992). Creating demand for biotechnology: Shaping technologies and markets. In Rod Coombs, Paoöo Saviotti, & Vivien Walsh (Eds.), Technological Change and Company Strategies: Economic and Sociological Perspectives (pp. 164–184). Academic Press. Grin, J. (2016). Transition Studies: Basic Ideas and Analytical Approaches. In Hexagon Series on Human and Environmental Security and Peace, 105–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43884-9_4 Grin, J., & Van de Graaf, H. (1996). Implementation as communicative action: An interpretive understanding of interactions between policy actors and target groups. Policy Sciences, 29(4), 291-319. Gupta, A. K., & Gupta, N. (2020). Effect of corporate environmental sustainability on dimensions of firm performance – Towards sustainable development: Evidence from India. Journal of Cleaner Production, 253, 119948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119948 Hanelt, A., Bohnsack, R., Marz, D., & Antunes Marante, C. (2021). A Systematic Review of the Literature on Digital Transformation: Insights and Implications for Strategy and Organizational Change. Journal of Management Studies, 58(5), 1159–1197. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12639 Hoogma, R., R. Kemp, J. Schot, & B. Truffer. (2002). Experimenting for sustainable transport: The approach of strategic niche management (pp. 180-203). Spon. Imbabi, M. S., Carrigan, C., & McKenna, S. (2012). Trends and developments in green cement and concrete technology. International Journal of Sustainable Built Environment, 1(2), 194-216. International Energy Agency (2023, August 2), Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Energy Data Explorer, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/greenhouse-gas-emissions-from-energy-data-explorer International Energy Agency (2023, December 21), Energy Statistics Data Browser, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/data-tools/energy-statistics-data-browser?country=TWN&fuel=Energy%20supply&indicator=TESbySource Jean, R.-J. “Bryan”, Kim, D., & Cavusgil, E. (2020). Antecedents and outcomes of digital platform risk for international new ventures’ internationalization. Journal of World Business, 55(1), 101021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2019.101021 Jones, N. (2018). How to stop data centres from gobbling up the world’s electricity. Nature, 561(7722), 163-166. Kauffman, R. J., & Walden, E. A. (2001). Economics and electronic commerce: Survey and directions for research. International journal of electronic commerce, 5(4), 5–116. Kemp, R., Schot, J., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: The approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–195. ABI/INFORM Collection; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS). Kim, H. J., Pan, G., & Pan, S. L. (2007). Managing IT-enabled transformation in the public sector: A case study on e-government in South Korea. Government Information Quarterly, 24(2), 338–352. Klerkx, L., & Aarts, N. (2013). The interaction of multiple champions in orchestrating innovation networks: Conflicts and complementarities. Technovation, 33(6), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.03.002 Köhler, J., Geels, F.W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M.S., Nykvist, B., Pel, B., Raven, B., Rohracher, H., Sandén, B., Schot, J., Sovacool, B., Turnheim, B., Welch, D., Wells, P., (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: state of the art and future directions. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 31, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.0 Kolk, A., & Ciulli, F. (2020). The potential of sustainability-oriented digital platform multinationals: A comment on the transitions research agenda. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 355-358. Latif, B., Mahmood, Z., Tze San, O., Mohd Said, R., & Bakhsh, A. (2020). Coercive, Normative and Mimetic Pressures as Drivers of Environmental Management Accounting Adoption. Sustainability, 12(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114506 Li, L., Su, F., Zhang, W., & Mao, J.-Y. (2018). Digital transformation by SME entrepreneurs: A capability perspective. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1129–1157. Liu, Y., Zhu, Q., & Seuring, S. (2020). New technologies in operations and supply chains: Implications for sustainability. International journal of production economics, 229, 107889. Loftus, P. J., Cohen, A. M., Long, J. C. S., & Jenkins, J. D. (2015). A critical review of global decarbonization scenarios: What do they tell us about feasibility? WIREs Climate Change, 6(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.324 Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., & Avelino, F. (2017). Sustainability Transitions Research: Transforming Science and Practice for Societal Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42(1), 599–626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340 Lucas Jr, H., Agarwal, R., Clemons, E. K., El Sawy, O. A., & Weber, B. (2013). Impactful research on transformational information technology: An opportunity to inform new audiences. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 371–382. Mäkitie, T., Steen, M., Thune, T. M., Lund, H. B., Kenzhegaliyeva, A., Ullern, E. F., Kamsvåg, P. F., Andersen, A. D. & Hydle, K. M. (2020). Greener and smarter? Transformations in five Norwegian industrial sectors. SINTEF AS (ISBN starter med 978-82-14-06433-9), 6, 16-19, 26. Mandviwalla, M., & Flanagan, R. (2021). Small business digital transformation in the context of the pandemic. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(4), 359–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2021.1891004 Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013 Martiskainen, M., & Kivimaa, P. (2018). Creating innovative zero carbon homes in the United Kingdom—Intermediaries and champions in building projects. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.08.002 Melo, D. I. C., Queiroz, G. A., Junior, P. N. A., Sousa, T. B. de, Yushimito, W. F., & Pereira, J. (2023). Sustainable digital transformation in small and medium enterprises (SMEs): A review on performance. Heliyon, 9(3), e13908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13908 Molloy, S., & Schwenk, C. R. (1995). The effects of information technology on strategic decision making. Journal of Management Studies, 32(3), 283–311. Oliveira, M. R. D., Sousa, T. B. D., Silva, C. V. D., Silva, F. A. D., & Costa, P. H. K. (2022). Supply Chain Management 4.0: Perspectives and insights from a bibliometric analysis and literature review. World Review of Intermodal Transportation Research, 11(1), 70–107. https://doi.org/10.1504/WRITR.2022.123099 Ordoñez De Pablos, P. (2023). Editorial: Accelerating the digital transformation and green transition towards a more inclusive society: Shaping dialogue on the twin challenges. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 14(4), 629–633. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSTPM-07-2023-194 Pappas, C., Karakosta, C., Marinakis, V., & Psarras, J. (2012). A comparison of electricity production technologies in terms of sustainable development. Energy conversion and management, 64, 626-632. Perez, C. (2019). 19. Transitioning to smart green growth: Lessons from history. In Roger Fouquet (Ed.), Handbook on green growth (pp. 447-463). Edward Elgar. Perlaviciute, G., Steg, L., & Sovacool, B. K. (2021). A perspective on the human dimensions of a transition to net-zero energy systems. Energy and Climate Change, 2, 100042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egycc.2021.100042 Putvinskiene, A. (2023). Sustainable Business in SMEs: Case Kiosked. [Master''s thesis, Laurea University of Applied Sciences]. Open Repository of the Universities of Applied Sciences. https://www.theseus.fi/handle/10024/802319 Quader, M. A., Ahmed, S., Ghazilla, R. A. R., Ahmed, S., & Dahari, M. (2015). A comprehensive review on energy efficient CO2 breakthrough technologies for sustainable green iron and steel manufacturing. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 594-614. Raven, R. P. J. M. (2005). Strategic niche management for biomass: a comparative study on the experimental introduction of bioenergy technologies in the Netherlands and Denmark. [Phd Thesis 1 (Research TU/e / Graduation TU/e), Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences]. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR590593 Raven, R. P. J. M. (2006). Towards alternative trajectories? Reconfigurations in the Dutch electricity regime. Research Policy, 35(4), 581–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.001 Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., Cohen, Y., & Rodrigues, M. (2020). Digitalization: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. In Z. Anisic, B. Lalic, & D. Gracanin (Eds.), Proceedings on 25th International Joint Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management – IJCIEOM, (pp. 443–456). Springer International Publishing. Reis, J., Amorim, M., Melão, N., & Matos, P. (2018). Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research. In Á. Rocha, H. Adeli, L. P. Reis, & S. Costanzo (Eds.), Trends and Advances in Information Systems and Technologies (pp. 411–421). Springer International Publishing. Rijswijk, K., Klerkx, L., Bacco, M., Bartolini, F., Bulten, E., Debruyne, L., ... & Brunori, G. (2021). Digital transformation of agriculture and rural areas: A socio-cyber-physical system framework to support responsibilisation. Journal of Rural Studies, 85, 79-90. Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. Human choice and climate change, 2(2), 327–399. Rogge, K. S. & Reichardt, K. (2016). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: An extended concept and framework for analysis. Research Policy, 45(8), 1620- 1635. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.04.004 Rosário, A. T., & Dias, J. C. (2022). Sustainability and the Digital Transition: A Literature Review. Sustainability, 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074072 Rosenbloom, D., Markard, J., Geels, F. W., & Fuenfschilling, L. (2020). Why carbon pricing is not sufficient to mitigate climate change—And how “sustainability transition policy” can help. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(16), 8664–8668. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2004093117 Sasse, T., Allan, S., & Rutter, J. (2021). Public engagement and net zero. INSTITUTE FOR GOVERNMENT. Satalkina, L., & Steiner, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship and its role in innovation systems: A systematic literature review as a basis for future research avenues for sustainable transitions. Sustainability, 12(7), 2764. Schot, J., & Geels, F.W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20, 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651 Schot, J. W., Slob, A., & Hoogma, R. (1996). De invoering van duurzame technologie: Strategisch Niche Management als beleidsinstrument. Programma DTO TU Delft, Delft. Shi, L., Han, L., Yang, F., & Gao, L. (2019). The Evolution of Sustainable Development Theory: Types, Goals, and Research Prospects. Sustainability, 11(24). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247158 Smith, A., Voß, J.-P., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023 Stewart, D. W., & Kamins, M. A. (1993). Secondary research: Information sources and methods (4th ed.). Newbury Park : Sage Publications. Tang, L., Shao, G., & Dai, L. (2009). Roles of digital technology in China’s sustainable forestry development. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 16(2), 94–101. Timothy F. S., & Tanya J. H. (2011). The Triple Bottom Line: What Is It and How Does It Work? Indiana Business Review, 86(1), 4-8. Turner, K., Katris, A., & Race, J. (2020). The need for a Net Zero Principles Framework to support public policy at local, regional and national levels. Local Economy, 35(7), 627–634. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269094220984742 Ulas, D. (2019). Digital Transformation Process and SMEs. Procedia Computer Science, 158, 662–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.101 Van den Bergh, J. C., Truffer, B., & Kallis, G. (2011). Environmental innovation and societal transitions: Introduction and overview. Environmental innovation and societal transitions, 1(1), 1-23. Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022 Vial, G. (2019). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 28(2), 118–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2019.01.003 WEC (2021). World Energy Issues Monitor 2021: Humanising Energy. World Energy Council. https://www.worldenergy.org/assets/downloads/Issues_Monitor_2021-final.pdf?v=1615977568 WEC (2022). World Energy Issues Monitor 2022: Energy in Uproar: Achieving Commitments through Community Action. World Energy Council. https://www.worldenergy.org/assets/downloads/World_Energy_Issues_Monitor_2022_-_Global_Report_1.pdf?v=1653922419 Westerman, G., C. Calméjane, D. Bonnet, P. Ferraris, and A. McAfee, (2011), Digital Transformation: A Road-Map for Billion-Dollar Organizations, MIT Center for digital business and capgemini consulting, 5. Witkamp, M. J., Raven, R. P. J. M., & Royakkers, L. M. M. (2011). Strategic niche management of social innovations: The case of social entrepreneurship. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(6), 667–681. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2011.585035 Wittmayer, J. M., Avelino, F., Steenbergen, F. van, & Loorbach, D. (2017). Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 24, 45–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003 Yin, R. K. (2003). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (3rd ed., pp. 85-96). SAGE Publications. Zeng, Q., Chen, W., & Huang, L. (2008). E-business transformation: An analysis framework based on critical organizational dimensions. Tsinghua Science and Technology, 13(3), 408–413. Zhang, A., Alvi, M. F., Gong, Y., & Wang, J. X. (2022). Overcoming barriers to supply chain decarbonization: Case studies of first movers. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 186, 106536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2022.106536 Zolfagharian, M., Walrave, B., Raven, R., & Romme, A. G. L. (2019). Studying transitions: Past, present, and future. Research Policy, 48(9), 103788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.04.012 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92611 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 在疫後新常態經濟中，數位經濟的潮流促使中小企業不得不認真面對數位轉型的壓力。當近年來的國際氣候倡議與管制已逐漸落實為具體的法規與政策壓力時，臺灣處在急需經濟復甦的後疫情時代，該如何「負擔」永續綠色的轉型？
本研究運用轉型理論中的策略利基管理途徑來檢視臺灣中小企業的數位綠色減碳實驗方案。探索其雙軸轉型樣貌、觀察與分析其如何啟動與成效為何？又其履行雙軸轉型的後續發展動態為何? 再透過深度訪談與次級資料交叉分析，觀察各主要行動者如何在保護空間內，招募成員組成實驗網絡與尋求方案的共識期望，並經中介者與支援者的橋接及網絡的連結與協力，以創造創新利基來影響既有的社會技術體制。 研究發現兩組實驗方案皆未失敗，雖尚無法佔領取代既有技術體制，然其創新利基正成為我國中小企業雙軸轉型各行動方案的學習元素。個案群成員無論服務業或製造業，對各自實驗方案期望的最大公約數皆是「商機與存活」。成員皆「肯認」淨零排放、綠色永續的趨勢，願意「依照自身的資源及需求」朝雙軸轉型邁出，初期係以數位轉型為重點，雖綠色轉型對中小企業是個較遙遠的領域，但數位商機會支撐其邁向綠色永續的嘗試。因此「數位應用帶來商機，商機支撐業者投入綠色減碳，而永續成長促使數位轉型」，為本研究在兩組實驗方案中觀察得出的結論。 此外本研究對中小企業雙軸轉型的政策建議是加強政府治理的角色。做為一個積極且有能力的角色，為促進既有社會技術體制邁向綠色永續，政府應循序抽離對其資源挹注與擺脫慣性路徑的依賴，並增加數位綠色減碳相關預算支出（或增加相關創新利基的投資抵免），創造更多保護空間以促進利基實驗的培育。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | In the new normal economy, the trend of digital economy compels small and medium enterprises (SMEs) to seriously confront the pressure of digital transformation. In recent years, international climate advocacy and regulation have gradually materialized into tangible legal and policy pressures. How can Taiwan "shoulder" the sustainability transition in the post-pandemic era of urgent economic recovery?
This study employs the strategic niche management approach from the transition theory to examine digital de-carbon experiments in Taiwan’s SMEs, including the observation and analysis of twin transition pattern, initiation, and its effectiveness. Furthermore, what are the subsequent developments in fulfilling the twin transition? Through in-depth interviews and cross-analysis of secondary data, observe how key actors recruit members, form experimental networks, and seek expectations and visions for solutions within the protected space. And through the bridging, linking, and collaboration facilitated by intermediaries and champions within social networks, to create innovative niches that influence existing socio-technical regimes. This study has found that both experiments did not fail. Although they have not yet been able to occupy or replace the existing socio-technical regimes, the innovative niches are becoming learning elements for various action plans of SMEs towards twin transition. The consensus among members, whether in the service or manufacturing industry, is “business opportunities and survival” as their common expectation for their respective experiments. All members recognize the trend of net-zero and sustainability and are willing to embark on a twin transition according to their own resources and needs. Initially, the focus is on digital transformation, although green transition is a distant field for SMEs. However, business opportunities of digitalization will support their attempt to move towards green sustainability. Therefore, “digital applications bring business opportunities, which support SMEs to invest in decarbonation, and sustainable growth prompts digital transformation” as concluded in this study's observation of two experiments. In addition, this study suggests government enhancing the governance in the policy of SMEs twin transition. As a proactive role, to facilitate the transition of existing socio-technical regimes towards green sustainability, the government should gradually disengage from resource injections and break away from dependency on inertia paths. Moreover, it should increase budget allocations for digital decarbonation (or increase investment incentives for related innovative niches), creating more protected space to foster niche experimentation. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-05-10T16:05:48Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-05-10T16:05:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
中文摘要 ii 英文摘要 iii 第一章 緒 論 1 第一節 研究緣起與問題意識 1 壹、研究緣起 2 貳、問題意識 6 第二節 研究目的與研究問題 9 壹、研究目的 9 貳、研究問題 12 第三節 論文結構與章節安排說明 15 第二章 相關理論回顧與文獻探討 19 第一節 相關概念檢討 19 壹、數位轉型 19 貳、雙軸轉型 22 參、臺灣中小企業 24 肆、結語 26 第二節 相關理論檢討 28 壹、轉型研究 28 貳、多層次視角 31 參、策略利基管理 33 肆、結語 41 第三節 國內外相關研究研析 44 壹、中小企業與數位轉型 44 貳、中小企業與永續發展 52 參、雙軸轉型 66 肆、企業與雙軸轉型研究檢視 74 伍、結語 82 第三章 研究設計 87 第一節 研究途徑與方法 87 壹、研究途徑 87 貳、研究方法 89 第二節 研究架構與流程 90 壹、研究架構 90 貳、研究流程 93 參、訪談設計 93 第三節 研究對象與資料來源 100 壹、研究對象 100 貳、資料來源 101 第四章 以策略利基管理途徑（SNM）檢視臺南驛站生活圈及綠色供應鏈之創新實驗方案 105 第一節 前瞻基礎建設到2050淨零排放路徑的數位綠色政策 105 壹、前瞻基礎建設計畫下的數位建設 106 貳、淨零排放路徑 112-115 綱要計畫 107 參、經濟部及所屬單位數位淨零轉型相關計畫 108 第二節 臺南驛站生活圈創新實驗方案 110 壹、實驗方案團隊組成 110 貳、創新實驗方案 113 參、利基孕育期之探索 117 肆、擴大利基期之探索 128 第三節 綠色供應鏈創新實驗方案 132 壹、實驗方案團隊組成 132 貳、創新實驗方案 136 參、利基孕育期之探索 140 肆、擴大利基期之探索 151 第四節 個案群研究綜整與比較分析 158 壹、團隊成員組成 158 貳、實驗方案、創新利基與期望 160 參、網絡平台樣態 160 肆、知識學習與技術交流模式 162 伍、與現存社會技術體制之互動 164 第五章 雙軸轉型實驗方案的啟動與持續履行分析 169 第一節 雙軸轉型實驗方案觀察分析 169 第二節 實驗方案創新利基與既有體制之互動與變遷 171 壹、臺南驛站生活圈實驗方案之創新利基與既有體制 171 貳、綠色供應鏈實驗方案之創新利基與既有體制 174 第三節 雙軸轉型關鍵因素關聯分析 177 壹、實驗方案啟動雙軸轉型關鍵因素 179 貳、實驗方案持續履行雙軸轉型關鍵因素 181 第六章 結論與建議 183 第一節 研究發現 183 第二節 研究限制 186 第三節 後續研究建議 187 壹、研究理論面 187 貳、研究個案面 188 參、政策資源面 189 肆、企業作為面 189 伍、創新技術面 190 第四節 政策建議 190 參考文獻 195 壹、中文 195 貳、英文 198 附 錄 207 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 從數位商機到永續轉型：以策略利基管理途徑檢視臺灣中小企業的雙軸轉型 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | From Business Opportunities of Digitalization to Sustainability Transition: A Strategic Niche Management Approach to Examine the Twin Transitions in Taiwan’s Small and Medium Enterprises | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張文龍;陳俊良 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wen-Long Chang;Chun-Liang Chen | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 策略利基管理,雙軸轉型,中小企業,數位轉型,綠色永續, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | strategic niche management (SNM),twin transition,small and medium enterprise (SME),digital transformation,sustainability, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 212 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400909 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-04-29 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 國家發展研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 國家發展研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-2.pdf | 6.96 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。