請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92333
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 童慶斌 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Ching-Pin Tung | en |
dc.contributor.author | 吳和陵 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | He-Ling Wu | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-21T16:40:01Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-22 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-21 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-17 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Bartkus, B., Glassman, M., & McAfee, B. R. (2006). Mission statement quality and financial performance. European Management Journal, 24(1), 86-94.
Carbon Disclosure Project. (2020). Five global organisations, whose frameworks, standards and platforms guide the majority of sustainability and integrated reporting, announce a shared vision of what is needed for progress towards comprehensive corporate reporting – and the intent to work together to achieve it. Retrieved from https://www.cdp.net/en/articles/media/comprehensive-corporate-reporting Climate Disclosure Standards Board. (2020). Global sustainability and integrated reporting organisations launch prototype climate-related financial disclosure standard. Retrieved from https://www.cdsb.net/news/corporate-reporting/1139/global-sustainability-and-integrated-reporting-organisations-launch. Dharma, S. W. (2018). A Balanced Scorecard Execution: A Key to Success for A Sustainable Credit Union. Jurnal Terapan Manajemen dan Bisnis, 4(2), 151-162. Epstein, M. J., & Wisner, P. S. (2001). Using a balanced scorecard to implement sustainability. Environmental quality management, 11(2), 1-10. Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard–linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284. Financial Stability Board. (2015). FSB to establish Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures. Retrieved from https://www.fsb.org/2015/12/fsb-to-establish-task-force-on-climate-related-financial-disclosures/ Hansen, E. G., & Schaltegger, S. (2016). The sustainability balanced scorecard: A systematic review of architectures. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 193-221. IFRS Foundation.. (2023). IFRS Foundation welcomes culmination of TCFD work and transfer of TCFD monitoring responsibilities to ISSB from 2024. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/news-and-events/news/2023/07/foundation-welcomes-tcfd-responsibilities-from-2024/ IFRS Foundation.. (2023). IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. IFRS Foundation.. (2023). ISSB Consultation on Agenda Priorities. Retrieved from https://www.ifrs.org/projects/work-plan/issb-consultation-on-agenda-priorities/ Integrated Reporting. (2022). IFRS Foundation completes consolidation with Value Reporting Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.integratedreporting.org/news/ifrs-foundation-completes-consolidation-with-value-reporting-foundation/ IRIS CARBON. (2023).Sustainability Reporting Challenges: Where Companies Often Miss the Mark. Retrieved from https://iriscarbon.com/sustainability-reporting-challenges-where-companies-often-miss-the-mark/#Common_Objectives_and_Frameworks_in_Sustainability_Reporting Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (1996). The Balanced Scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (1996). Using the Balanced Scorecard as a Strategic Management System. Harvard Business Review. 75-85. Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston: Harvard Business School Press Kleindorfer, P. R., Singhal, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Sustainable operations management. Production and operations management, 14(4), 482-492. KPMG.(2022). Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/se/pdf/komm/2022/Global-Survey-of-Sustainability-Reporting-2022.pdf Michael Porter. (1996). “What Is Strategy?” Harvard Business Review 61–78. Public-Private Partnership Legal Resource Center. (2022). Public Private Partnerships in Ports/Port Reform. Retrieved from https://ppp.worldbank.org/public-privatepartnership/sector/transportation/ports Schaltegger, S., & Lüdeke-Freund, F. (2011). The sustainability balanced scorecard: Concept and the case of Hamburg airport. Centre for Sustainability Management (CSM), Leuphana Universität Lüneburg. The EDHEC Infrastructure & Private Assets Research Institute. (2023). Ensuring Fair Treatment for UK Pensioners. Retrieved from https://edhec.infrastructure.institute/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Submission-to-the-Department-of-Work-and-Pensions.pdf United Nations Global Compact. (2004). Who cares wins: Connecting financial markets to a changing world. Retrieved from https://www.unepfi.org/fileadmin/events/2004/stocks/who_cares_wins_global_compact_2004.pdf Tzeng, G. H., Chiang, C. H., and Li, C. W. (2007). Evaluating intertwined effects in elearning programs: a novel hybrid MCDM model based on factor analysis and DEMATEL. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 32, No. 4, 1028-1044. World Economic Forum. (2023). The Global Risks Report 2023. Wu, H. Y. (2012). Constructing a strategy map for banking institutions with key performance indicators of the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and program planning, 35(3), 303-320.IFRS. (2020).Consultation Paper on Sustainability Reporting. 上海港(2023)。公司簡介。官方網站。檢自:https://www.sipgbayport.com/about-sipg/ 公司治理中心(2022)。歐盟採行的公司永續報導指令,其影響會擴及到歐洲以外。檢自:https://cgc.twse.com.tw/latestNews/promoteNewsArticleCh/4229 王鵬程、孫玫、黃世忠、葉豐瀅 (2023)。兩項國際財務報告可持續披露準則分析與展望。財會月刊 (2023-14)。 企業永續發展協會(2023)。2023年臺灣永續金融大調查。檢自:https://www.city.yokohama.lg.jp/lang/overseas/port/network/portal.html 吳智鴻(2023)。行動裝置軟體應用研究。檢自:http://120.108.221.55/profchwu/mobile/ 呂玲 (2012)。大專校院數位學習課程認證指標關聯性與重要性之研究,國立交通大學數位圖書資訊學程碩士論文。 张泽颖(2011)。房地产开发企业绩效战略管理工具的选择探讨,重庆科技学院学报: 社会科学版, (23), 80-82。 張冠羣(2020)。人工智慧創新應用之研究。臺灣師範大學工業教育學系碩士論文。 林光、陳福照、陳彥宏、陳淑玲(2000)。航港體制變革中港務機關定位與組織之研究。交通部委託研究報告。國立海洋大學航運管理研究所。 金管會證券期貨局 (2023)。推動我國接軌IFRS永續揭露準則藍圖。 金融監督管理委員會 (2023)。上市櫃公司永續發展行動方案。 金融監督管理委員會 (2023)。接軌IFRS永續揭露準則專區。 氣候相關財務揭露工作小組(2019)。氣候相關財務揭露建議繁體中文版。檢自: https://www.fsb-tcfd.org/publications/ 曹國俊 (2022)。國際可持續發展準則理事會的設立、進展及未來。金融會計,(339)。 許哲維 (2020)。航港改制八年, 臺灣港務公司法律關係變動之探討。 台北海洋科技大學學報, 11(2), 163-182。 倪以理、曲向军 (2022)。可持續發展:全球金融業實踐與探索。麥肯錫中國金融業CEO季刊(2022-40)。 游舒帆(2021)。數據化營運管理的核心指標:領先指標 vs 落後指標。商業思維學院。檢自:https://bizthinking.com.tw/2021/08/25/vs/ 經理人月刊編輯部(2010)。5分鐘!瞭解「平衡計分卡」,經理人。檢自:https://www.managertoday.com.tw/articles/view/2489 經理人編輯部(2023)。SWOT分析表怎麼做?4個面向與定義,為企業和個人指出成功模式,經理人。檢自:https://www.managertoday.com.tw/glossary/view/15? 葉承宇(2019)。淺談品質指標及決策實驗室分析方法介紹。檢自:https://www.slideshare.net/yadean/ss-157771973 蔡采佳 (2022)。企業ESG永續治理整合框架與支援決策工具發展,國立臺灣大學生物環境系統工程學系碩士論文。 臺灣港務有限公司(2022)。2022年 ESG永續報告書。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92333 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著全球對環境、社會與治理(Environmental, Social, and Governance, ESG)議題的日益關注,企業的永續治理和資訊揭露標準化成為國際趨勢,更是全球迫切的需求,而如何具系統性的導入新興規範成為重要課題。在此背景下,國際永續準則委員會(International Sustainability Standards Board, ISSB)所制定出了國際財務報導準則(International Financial Reporting Standards, IFRS)第S1號以及第S2號標準,其中IFRS S2作為氣候相關財務揭露的重要指南,對企業策略和運營將帶來重大影響。本研究聚焦於探討永續平衡計分卡(Sustainable Balanced Scorecard, SBSC)及結合企業ESG永續治理整合框架,旨在分析策略工具如何協助企業有效應對這類新興外部合規要求,其中以遵循IFRS S2標準為主。
研究方法分為三個主要部分:首先,建立永續平衡計分卡與策略地圖,以分析企業永續發展的現狀及其與使命願景、策略方向的對應關係,並針對各個策略目標透過決策實驗室分析法(Decision Making and Trial Evaluation Laboratory, DEMATEL)分析得出其相互影響程度。再者進行深入的文本分析,對IFRS S2的關鍵要求進行全面整理與評估。最後,將IFRS S2的氣候關鍵要求以及策略目標融入企業的ESG永續治理框架中,評估IFRS S2對企業策略的具體影響。 研究結果顯示,透過結合永續平衡計分卡與ESG永續治理整合框架,企業能夠更全面地評估氣候變遷及其他ESG因素對其策略的影響。針對案例企業臺灣港務公司,IFRS S2對其策略地圖的分析顯示,企業後續若想全面導入此新興標準,其氣候策略、溫室氣體排放管理和經濟績效等議題將成為重點。此外,研究發現IFRS S2標準的要求主要與永續平衡計分卡的三大構面:永續、利害關係人、內部流程密切相關。其中,透過各策略目標間的影響程度關聯,得出企業內部流程的改善對於提高整體永續績效具有重大影響。此發現將能強化整合IFRS S2標準於企業永續治理中的效率,尤其是在促進企業內部流程改善以提升整體永續表現層面。 本研究為企業在面對氣候變遷及其他ESG挑戰時提供了一種策略性管理工具的新視角,並對於如何整合國際永續發展標準提出了具體的方法和建議。未來的研究可進一步探討不同行業對於這些標準的具體應用,並考慮更廣泛的外部永續揭露標準,以豐富本研究的框架和結論。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | With the growing global focus on Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) issues, the standardization of sustainable development and information disclosure has become an international trend and a global imperative. Against this backdrop, the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) S2, serving as a vital guideline for climate-related financial disclosures, significantly impacts corporate strategies and operations. This study explores the integration of the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) and the ESG Sustainability Governance Framework, analyzing how these strategic tools assist enterprises in effectively addressing such emerging external compliance demands, particularly in adhering to the IFRS S2 standard.
The research methodology is divided into three main parts: Firstly, establishing the SBSC and strategy maps to analyze the current state of corporate sustainable development and its alignment with mission, vision, and strategic direction, and identifying causal relationships between various strategic goals through DEMATEL analysis. Secondly, a thorough textual analysis of the key requirements of IFRS S2 is conducted for comprehensive organization and assessment. Finally, integrating the climate-critical requirements of S2 and strategic objectives into the enterprise’s ESG Sustainability Governance Framework to evaluate the specific impact of S2 on corporate strategy. The results show that by combining the SBSC with the ESG Sustainability Governance Framework, enterprises can more comprehensively assess the impact of climate change and other ESG factors on their strategies. For the case study of Taiwan Port Corporation, the analysis of IFRS S2 on its strategy map indicates that climate strategy, greenhouse gas emission management, and economic performance are key focus areas for comprehensive adoption of this emerging standard. Moreover, the study finds that the requirements of the IFRS S2 standard are closely related to three main aspects of the SBSC—sustainability, stakeholder, and internal processes. Importantly, through the causal linkage between strategic objectives, it is concluded that improvements in internal processes significantly enhance overall sustainable performance. This finding will strengthen the integration of the IFRS S2 standard into corporate sustainability governance, particularly in promoting internal process improvements to enhance overall sustainable performance. This study provides a new perspective on strategic management tools for enterprises facing climate change and other ESG challenges and offers concrete methods and suggestions for integrating international sustainability standards. Future research can further explore the specific application of these standards in different industries and consider a broader range of external sustainability disclosure standards to enrich the framework and conclusions of this study. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-21T16:40:01Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-21T16:40:01Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目錄
口試委員審定書 i 謝誌 ii 中文摘要 iii Abstract v 目錄 vii 圖目錄 x 表目錄 xii 第一章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景與動機 1 1.2 研究目的 3 1.3 研究流程與架構 4 第二章 文獻回顧 7 2.1 策略管理工具 7 2.2 永續平衡計分卡 9 2.2.1 傳統平衡計分卡起源與架構 9 2.2.2 策略地圖 13 2.2.3 永續平衡計分卡類別、建構與案例 16 2.3 國際財務報導永續揭露準則 21 2.3.1 永續揭露起源與發展現況 21 2.3.2 國際財務報導永續揭露準則現況 24 2.3.3 永續揭露準則第2號:氣候相關揭露 26 2.3.4 國際財務報導永續揭露準則於臺灣規範 28 2.4 企業ESG永續治理整合框架 29 2.5 港口發展現況與永續議題分析 30 2.5.1 全球港口發展及永續趨勢 30 2.5.2 臺灣港務發展及永續趨勢 31 第三章 研究方法 33 3.1 企業永續平衡計分卡建置 33 3.1.1 願景使命和策略拆分與重大主題對應 34 3.1.2 永續平衡計分卡及策略地圖建立 35 3.1.3 策略目標關聯問卷設計 36 3.2 國際財務報導永續揭露準則氣候關鍵揭露要求分析 39 3.3 永續治理整合框架連結氣候關鍵揭露要求及策略目標 40 第四章 案例分析與永續平衡計分卡建置 45 4.1 港務公司永續議題分析 45 4.1.1 願景使命與永續策略介紹 45 4.1.2 標竿企業永續策略 48 4.1.3 案例企業重大主題分析 51 4.1.4 案例企業願景使命、發展策略與重大主題對應 54 4.2 港務公司永續平衡計分卡 57 4.2.1 策略目標篩選與建立 57 4.2.2 對應策略地圖構面 68 4.2.3 各策略目標影響程度 73 第五章 IFRS S2對案例企業影響分析 81 5.1 氣候關鍵揭露要求分析結果 81 5.2 企業ESG永續治理框架連結 85 5.3 IFRS S2觸及之大主題 87 5.4 策略地圖之策略目標觸及之大主題 88 5.5 主題缺口分析 90 第六章 結論與建議 101 6.1 結論 101 6.2 建議 103 參考文獻 106 附件 111 附件一:港務公司策略地圖問卷 111 附件二:直接關係矩陣 117 附件三:正規化矩陣X 118 附件四:總影響關係矩陣T 119 IFRS S2關鍵要求對應永續治理框架環境主題 120 IFRS S2關鍵要求對應永續治理框架經濟主題 123 IFRS S2關鍵要求對應永續治理框架公司治理主題 124 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 永續平衡計分卡於強化企業治理的應用:以臺灣港務公司面對IFRS S2合規挑戰為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Applying the Sustainable Balanced Scorecard in Corporate Governance: A Case Study of Taiwan Ports Corporation on IFRS S2 Compliance | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 李明旭;馬鴻文;謝宜桓 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Ming-Hsu Li;Hwong-Wen Ma;Yi-Huan Hsieh | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 永續平衡計分卡,氣候變遷,氣候相關揭露,永續治理, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Sustainable Balanced Scorecard,Climate-related disclosure,Sustainability Governance,Climate Change, | en |
dc.relation.page | 126 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400631 | - |
dc.rights.note | 未授權 | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-17 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 氣候變遷與永續發展國際學位學程(含碩士班、博士班) |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 9.53 MB | Adobe PDF |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。