請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92292
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 曹承礎 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Seng-Cho T. Chou | en |
dc.contributor.author | 葉聖文 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Sheng-Wen Yeh | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-21T16:28:17Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-22 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-21 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2024-01-10 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Athersys inc. Available at https://www.athersys.com/home/default.aspx
2. Baras A, “Drug development risk and the cost of capital,” Nature Review Drug Discovery, (2012), 11(5):347-8. 3. Beg S, (2020), Pharmaceutical Drug Product Development and Process Optimization, 1st edition. 4. Congressional Budget Office, (2021), Research and Development in the Pharmaceutical Industry, Available at https://www.cbo.gov/publication/57025 5. Dydiowa G, “How large pharma impacts biotechnology startup success,” Nature Biotechnology, (2021),39(3) 266-269. 6. GBD Stroke Collaborators,“2019 Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990~2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016, ”Lancet Neurology, (2016),18(5): 439–458. 7. Global data. Available at https://www.globaldata.com/ 8. Gorelick P, “The global burden of stroke: persistent and disabling,” Lancet Neurology (2019), Vol 18, 417-8. 9. Gurgula O, “Strategic Patenting by Pharmaceutical Companies–Should Competition Law Intervene,” IIC Int Rev Ind Prop Copyr Law, (2020), 51(9): 1062–1085. 10. Hay M, “Clinical development success rates for investigational drugs,” Nature Biotechnology, (2014), 32(1):40-51. 11. IQVIA, “The global use of medicines 2023,” IQVIA Institute for human data science, (2023), Available at https://www.iqvia.com/-/media/iqvia/pdfs/library/presentations/presentation_global_meds_2023_webinar.pdf 12. Lee D, “Comparison of regulatory frameworks of environmental risk assessments for human pharmaceuticals in EU, USA, and Canada,” Science of The Total Environment, (2019), vol 671, 1026-1035. 13. Leslie-Mazwi, “T, To tPA or Not to tPA, That Is the Question,” American Journal of Neuroradiology, (2017), 38 (8) 1464-1466. 14. Mullard A, “Parsing clinical success rates,” Nature reviews drug discovery, (2016),15, 447. 15. Neuendorf .E, “A formula for drug licensing deals,” Nature Biopharmdeal, (2023), B28-29. 16. Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America, (2021), PhRMA Annual Membership Survey. 17. Pu L, “Projected Global Trends in Ischemic Stroke Incidence, Deaths and Disability-Adjusted Life Years From 2020 to 2030,” Stroke, (2023), 54(5): 1330-1339. 18. Pugatch Consilium, “2015, The Biopharmaceutical Investment & Competitiveness,” (2015), (BCI) Survey. 19. PWC, (2020), “Creating a stable drug pricing strategy in an unstable global market,” Available at 19. https://www.pwc.tw/zh/publications/topic-bio/assets/2020-pharma-price.pdf 20. Saini V, “Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions”, Neurology, (2021), 97(20 Suppl 2): S6-S16. 21. SanBio. Available at https://www.sanbio.com/en/advantage/sb623/ 22. Sood N, “The Flow of Money Through the Pharmaceutical Distribution System,” (2017), Schaeffer Center White Paper Series. 23. Stasior J, (2018), Valuing Pharmaceutical Assets: When to Use NPV vs rNPV, Alacrita. 24. Statista, (2023), Market share of leading 10 national pharmaceutical markets worldwide in 2022. Available at https://www.statista.com/statistics/245473/market-share-of-the-leading-10-global-pharmaceutical-markets/ 25. TMS Co. Ltd, Available at https://www.tms-japan.co.jp/en/index.html 26. Tu W, “ Estimated Burden of Stroke in China in 2020,” JAMA Network Open, (2023), 6(3): e231455. 27. World Bank Open Data. available at https://data.worldbank.org/ 28. Wouters O, “Estimated Research and Development Investment Needed to Bring a New Medicine to Market, 2009~2018,” JAMA Network, (2020), 323(9): 844-853. 29. Yancey M, “Oncology Drug Development: What Is Changing,” Oncology Nursing Society, (2008), 12(5), 713-715. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92292 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 在生物技術和製藥行業中,對新藥項目進行價值評估是一項既複雜又對決策至關重要的工作,它涉及多種因素,包括項目的開發階段、產品特性、競爭優勢、預期的資本需求、市場環境以及產業政策的變化等。這一評估過程不僅需要深厚的專業知識,而且往往受到主觀判斷的影響,且通常缺乏透明度。然而,進行準確的項目評估對於確定投資和產出的時機至關重要,是生物技術和製藥公司成功引進和授權新藥項目的關鍵。
在業界,風險調整淨現值法和比較法是常用的評估方法。2023年,Neuendorf團隊創新性地提出了一種專為生物技術和製藥行業設計的授權總里程碑金計算方法,這種方法通過分析首付款來估算後續開發階段的里程碑金比例及總額。本研究以一家台灣生物技術公司的實際授權案例為基礎,比較了談判中使用的風險調整淨現值法和比較法的評估結果與首付款公式法的計算結果。研究發現,每種方法都有其獨特的優勢和局限性,因此,採用一種靈活的、綜合性的評估方法,能夠平衡這些方法的優點,同時克服它們的限制,從而提供更全面、更精確的新藥價值評估。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industry, valuing new drug projects is a complex and crucial task for decision-making, involving a multitude of factors. These include the development stage of the project, product characteristics and competitive advantages, anticipated capital requirements, market environment, and changes in industry policies. This assessment process not only requires extensive professional knowledge but is often influenced by subjective judgments and generally lacks transparency. However, accurate project valuation is essential for determining the timing of investments and outputs, key to the successful introduction and licensing of new drug projects by biotech and pharmaceutical companies.
In the industry, risk-adjusted Net Present Value (rNPV) and comparative methods are commonly used for valuation. In 2023, the Neuendorf team innovatively proposed a method specifically designed for the biotech and pharmaceutical industry to estimate the proportions and total amounts of milestone payments in subsequent development stages, using upfront payments. This study is based on an actual licensing case of a Taiwanese biotechnology company, comparing the valuation results of the rNPV and comparative methods used in negotiations with the outcomes calculated by the upfront payment formula method. The study found that each method has its unique advantages and limitations. Therefore, employing a flexible, comprehensive assessment approach can balance the strengths of these methods while overcoming their limitations, thereby providing a more holistic and accurate valuation of new drug projects. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-21T16:28:17Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-21T16:28:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 目次
謝誌 ii 中文摘要 iii THESIS ABSTRACT iv 目次 v 圖次 vi 表次 vii 第一章 緒論 1 第一節 研究動機 1 第二節 研究流程與架構 3 第二章 文獻回顧 4 第一節 新藥開發產業的動態特性與全球影響力 4 第二節 新藥價值評估的方法 13 第三章 研究方法 20 第一節 研究設計 20 第二節 資料收集方法 20 第三節 評估指標 20 第四節 資料分析方法 21 第五節 倫理考慮 21 第六節 研究限制 21 第四章 研究結果 22 第一節 新藥項目背景介紹 22 第二節 授權價值估算結果 25 第三節 比較法、rNPV法與首付款公式法比較與討論 32 第五章 結論與建議 34 第一節 研究結論 34 第二節 研究建議 35 參考文獻 37 圖次 圖 1. 研究流程圖 3 圖 2. 新藥開發的結構化研究與開發流程 7 圖 3. 主要疾病領域的臨床二期、三期試驗成功率與累積成功率 10 圖 4. 個案項目依首付款公式法計算後的里程碑金分布 31 表次 表 1. 2020年美國藥物研究與開發費用分布 8 表 2. 臨床試驗個階段與累積成功率 9 表 3. 個案項目風險調整後淨現值 27 表 4. 對照項目開發現狀與授權條件整理 30 表 5. 個案項目依首付款公式法計算結果整理 31 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 生技新藥產業授權價值之研究:以某生技公司為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | A Study on the Licensing Value of the Biopharmaceutical New Drug Industry: The Case Study of a Biotechnology Industry Corporation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 陳建錦;陳鴻基 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Chien-Chin Chen ;Houn-Gee Chen | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 生技產業,價值評估,風險調整淨現值, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Biotech,asset evaluation,NPV, | en |
dc.relation.page | 38 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400067 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-01-11 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 管理學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 碩士在職專班資訊管理組 | - |
dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-12-28 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 資訊管理組 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.25 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。