虛實之間— 《女人屐痕》書寫暨地標實作

Abstract

空間是權力與記憶競逐的場域，刻畫人們生活足跡和社會變遷的事實。地景作為一種表意系統，訴說著人與人之間的互動與連結。過去的公共空間多以男性 視角為設計主軸，少有以女性為主體的詮釋內涵，此乃呈現出空間作為社會關係的 地理銘印。本文以女性地標決策小組的行動、為研究範圍，採訪談法、觀察法與文本分析，並使用女性主義空間政治、批判性襲產、（反）紀念碑、倡議式徒步導覽等理論為基礎，分析決策小組的空間行動策略，提出三個層次的研究發現，以回應本研究提問，即如何透過空間實作解構主流地景，並重構以女性為歷史敘事主體的空間觀。

首先從出版《女人屐痕Ⅰ》、《女人屐痕Ⅱ》、《女人屐痕Ⅲ：百年女史在台灣》 和《女人屐痕Ⅳ》共計四冊女性歷史場址導覽書，將過去多以時間為軸的歷史敘事， 擴增空間向度的書寫內容，導覽書增添以往不易發現的空間立面，並指出它對女性 歷史的影響，透過空間書寫找回女人在歷史中作為主體的發聲位置。再來分析決策 小組設置的十五個女性地標，對主流陽剛地景隱含的意識形態產生何種擾動程度， 並指出以此類微型地標欲擾動整體地景文化的侷限。最後彙整決策小組透過連點成線的地景導覽走讀，將女性視角納入歷史訴說者的位置，鬆動主流文本的性別秩序，重塑具有女人主體觀點的敘事。由此三個接續性的發現聚焦回應本研究核心—如何透過空間，紀念化台灣女性歷史。

Space is a field where power and memories compete, depicting the footprints of people’s lives and the facts of social changes. Landscape, as an ideology system, tells the interactions and connections between people. In the past, public spaces were mostly designed with a male perspective, and few interpretations focused on women. This shows that space is a geographical imprint of social relations. This article takes the women’s landmark decision-making group as the research target, using interview methods, observation methods and text analysis, and uses theories such as feminist spatial politics, critical patrimony, (anti)monuments, and critical walking tours. Analyze the spatial action strategies of the decision-making group and propose three levels of research findings in response to this research question, that is, how to deconstruct the mainstream landscape through spatial implementation and reconstruct the space view with women as the subject of historical narrative.

First of all, four volumes of guiding books on women''s historical sites were published, which brought together many historical sites in the past. The historical narrative with time as the axis expands the writing content of the spatial dimension. The guiding book adds a spatial dimension that was not easy to find in the past, and points out its impact on women''s history. Through spatial writing, the role of women as the subject in history is retrieved. Vocal position. Next, let’s analyze the extent to which the fifteen female landmarks set up by the decision-making group have disturbed the implicit ideology of mainstream masculine landscapes, and point out the limitations of using such micro-landmarks to disturb the overall landscape culture. Finally, the decision-making group assembled a dot-and-line landscape tour to incorporate the female perspective into the position of historical teller, loosen the gender order of mainstream texts, and reshape the narrative with a woman''s subjective perspective. From this, three consecutive findings focus on responding to the core of this research—how to commemorate Taiwanese women’s history through space.