請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92155完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 劉好迪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Adrian Rauchfleisch | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 劉宜庭 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Yi-Ting Liu | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-07T16:20:20Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-08 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-07 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-18 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Adair, B., & Stencel, M. (2020, July). A lesson in automated journalism: Bring back the humans. Retrieved from https://www.niemanlab.org/2020/07/a-lesson-in-automated-journalism-bring-back-the-humans/
Aisha Malik (2023). TikTok is testing 15-minute uploads with select users. TechCrunch, October 24, 2023. Alonso López, N., Sidorenko Bautista, P., & Giacomelli, F. (2021). Beyond challenges and viral dance moves: TikTok as a vehicle for disinformation and fact-checking in Spain, Portugal, Brazil, and the USA. Alonso-López, N.qpslcm@ikd Sidorenko-Bautista, P.qpslcm@ikd Giacomelli, F. (2021). Beyond challenges and viral dance moves: TikTok as a vehicle for disinformation and fact-checking in Spain, Portugal, Brazil, and the USA. Anàlisi Quad. Comun. Cult., 64, 65–84. Ardèvol-Abreu, A., Delponti, P., & Rodríguez-Wanguemert, C. (2020). Intentional or inadvertent fake news sharing? Fact-checking warnings and users´ interaction with social media content. Profesional de la información/Information Professional, 29(5). Ball, P., & Maxmen, A. (2020). The epic battle against coronavirus misinformation and conspiracy theories. Nature, 581(7809), 371–374. Bélair-Gagnon, V., Larsen, R., Graves, L., & Westlund, O. (2023). Knowledge Work in Platform Fact-Checking Partnerships. International Journal of Communication, 17, 21. Bell, E. (2019, December). The fact-check industry. Retrieved from https://www.cjr.org/special_report/fact-check-industry-twitter.php/ Bettadapur, A. N. (2020). TikTok partners with fact-checking experts to combat misinformation. TikTok Newsroom, October, 1, 2020. Bhargava, P., MacDonald, K., Newton, C., Lin, H., & Pennycook, G. (2023). How effective are TikTok misinformation debunking videos?. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. Bösch, M., & Ricks, B. (2021). Broken Promises: TikTok and the German Election. Mountain View, CA: Mozilla Foundation. Boyd, D. (2010). Social network sites as networked publics: Affordances, dynamics, and implications. Networked Self: Identity, Community, and Culture on Social Network Sites (pp. 39-58). Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of computer‐mediated Communication, 13(1), 210-230. Brandtzaeg, P. B., Følstad, A., & Chaparro Domínguez, M. Á. (2018). How journalists and social media users perceive online fact-checking and verification services. Journalism practice, 12(9), 1109-1129. Bruns, A., & Moe, H. (2014). Structural layers of communication on Twitter. Twitter and society, 15-28. New York: Peter Lang. Bucher, T. (2017). The algorithmic imaginary: exploring the ordinary affects of Facebook algorithms. Information, Communication & Society, 20:1, 30-44. Bucher, T., & Helmond, A. (2017). The affordances of social media platforms. The SAGE handbook of social media, 1, 233-253. Buente, W., Rathnayake, C., Neo, R., Dalisay, F., & Kramer, H. K. (2020). Tradition gone mobile: An exploration of #betelnut on Instagram. Substance use & misuse, 55(9), 1483-1492. Campbell, C., & Farrell, J. R. (2020). More than meets the eye: The functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business horizons, 63(4), 469-479. Carah, N., & Shaul, M. (2016). Brands and Instagram: Point, tap, swipe, glance. Mobile Media & Communication, 4(1), 69-84. Cazzamatta, R., & Santos, A. (2023). Checking verifications during the 2022 Brazilian run-off election: How fact-checking organizations exposed falsehoods and contributed to the accuracy of the public debate. Journalism, 14648849231196080. Chen, Q., Min, C., Zhang, W., Ma, X., & Evans, R. (2020). Factors driving citizen engagement with government TikTok accounts during the COVID-19 pandemic: Model development and analysis. Journal of medical internet research, 23(2), e21463. Chugh, R., Patel, S. B., Patel, N., & Ruhi, U. (2019). Likes, comments and shares on social media: Exploring user engagement with a state tourism Facebook page. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 15(2), 104-122. Clayton, K., Blair, S., Busam, J. A., Forstner, S., Glance, J., Green, G., Kawata, A., Kovvuri, A., Martin, J., Morgan, E., Sandhu, M., Sang, R., Scholz‑Bright, R., Welch, A. T., Wolf, A. G., Zhou, A.,& Nyhan, B. (2019). Real solutions for fake news? Measuring the effectiveness of general warnings and fact-check tags in reducing belief in false stories on social media. Political behavior, 42, 1073-1095. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis of the behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press. Cotter, K., DeCook, J. R., & Kanthawala, S. (2022). Fact-checking the crisis: COVID-19, infodemics, and the platformization of truth. Social Media+ Society, 8(1), 20563051211069048. daily dose posts. [@idailyfunfacts]. (2022, November 9). Crazy facts #crazyfacts #factsdaily #facts #factcheck #factorcap #factsdontliepeopledo [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@idailyfunfacts/video/7163752029188394282 Dixon, S. J. (2023, August). Global social networks ranked by number of users 2023. Retrieved from https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/ Ecker, U. K., Lewandowsky, S., & Chadwick, M. (2020). Can corrections spread misinformation to new audiences? Testing for the elusive familiarity backfire effect. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5, 1-25. Ellison, N., & Boyd, D. M. (2013). Sociality through social network sites. In Dutton, W. H. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151-172. Fiallos, A., Fiallos, C., & Figueroa, S. (2021, July). Tiktok and education: Discovering knowledge through learning videos. In 2021 Eighth International Conference on EDemocracy & EGovernment (ICEDEG) (pp. 172-176). IEEE. Flew, T., Spurgeon, C., Daniel, A., & Swift, A. (2012). The promise of computational journalism. Journalism practice, 6(2), 157-171. Freiling, I., Krause, N. M., Scheufele, D. A., & Brossard, D. (2021). Believing and sharing misinformation, fact-checks, and accurate information on social media: The role of anxiety during COVID-19. New Media & Society, 25(1), 141-162. Fridkin, K., Kenney, P. J., & Wintersieck, A. (2015). Liar, liar, pants on fire: How fact-checking influences citizens’ reactions to negative advertising. Political Communication, 32, 127–151. Gallacher, J. D., Barash, V., Howard, P. N., & Kelly, J. (2018). Junk news on military affairs and national security: Social media disinformation campaigns against us military personnel and veterans. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.03572. Gaver, W. W. (1991, March). Technology affordances. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 79-84). Gehl, R. W., & Lawson, S. T. (2022). Social Engineering: How Crowdmasters, Phreaks, Hackers, and Trolls Created a New Form of Manipulative Communication. MIT Press. Gelman, A. (2005). Analysis of variance – why it is more important than ever. Ann. Stat., 33, 1–53. Gibson, J. J. (1977). The concept of affordances. Perceiving, acting, and knowing, 1, 1. Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of “platforms.” New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444809342738 Gillespie, T. (2018). Custodians of the internet: Platforms, content moderation, and the hidden decisions that shape social media. Yale University Press. Gillespie, T. (2020). Platforms throw content moderation at every problem. Fake news: Understanding media and misinformation in the digital age (pp. 329–339). The MIT Press. Glăveanu, V. P. (2020). A sociocultural theory of creativity: Bridging the social, the material, and the psychological. Review of General psychology, 24(4), 335-354. Graves, D. (2018). Understanding the promise and limits of automated fact-checking. Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism. Graves, L. (2018). Boundaries not drawn: Mapping the institutional roots of the global fact-checking movement. Journalism studies, 19(5), 613-631. Graves, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2019). Fact-checking as idea and practice in journalism. Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Graves, L., & Amazeen, M. A. (2019). Fact-checking as idea and practice in journalism. In L. Graves & M. A. Amazeen (Eds.), Oxford research encyclopedia of communication. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.013.808 Graves, L., & Cherubini, F. (2016). The rise of fact-checking sites in Europe. Digital News Project Report. Graves, L., Bélair-Gagnon, V., & Larsen, R. (2023). From Public Reason to Public Health: Professional Implications of the “Debunking Turn” in the Global Fact-Checking Field. Digital Journalism, 1-20. Graves, L., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2016, January). Why do journalists fact-check? The role of demand- and supply-side factors. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/161442732.pdf Grover, S. (2023). The People’s Choice: Pairing User-Centered Design With Crowdsourcing to Combat Misinformation on TikTok (Doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland, College Park). Haque, M. M., Yousuf, M., Alam, A. S., Saha, P., Ahmed, S. I., & Hassan, N. (2020). Combating misinformation in Bangladesh: Roles and responsibilities as perceived by journalists, fact-checkers, and users. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), 1-32. Haque, M. M., Yousuf, M., Alam, A. S., Saha, P., Ahmed, S. I., & Hassan, N. (2020). Combating misinformation in Bangladesh: Roles and responsibilities as perceived by journalists, fact-checkers, and users. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 4(CSCW2), 1-32. Hassan, N., Yousuf, M., Mahfuzul Haque, M., A. Suarez Rivas, J., & Khadimul Islam, M. (2019, May). Examining the roles of automation, crowds and professionals towards sustainable fact-checking. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference (pp. 1001-1006). Hayes, R. A., Carr, C. T., & Wohn, D. Y. (2016). One click, many meanings: Interpreting paralinguistic digital affordances in social media. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 60(1), 171-187. Hodge N., Lister T., Kottasová I., & Regan H. (2022). Russia launches military attack on Ukraine with reports of explosions and troops crossing border. Cable News Network, Februaryr,24, 2022. Holan, A. D. (2018, February). The Principles of the Truth-O-Meter: PolitiFact’s methodology for independent fact-checking. Retrieved from https://www.politifact.com/article/2018/feb/12/principles-truth-o-meter-politifacts-methodology-i/ Hopkins, J. (2015). Assembling blog affordances: Theorising affordances and agency in new media. EASA Media Anthropology Network, 7, 1-1. Hopkins, J. (2016). The concept of affordances in digital media. Handbuch soziale praktiken und digitale alltagswelten, 47-54. Hutchby, I. (2013). Conversation and technology: From the telephone to the Internet. John Wiley & Sons. Jiang, S., & Wilson, C. (2018). Linguistic signals under misinformation and fact-checking: Evidence from user comments on social media. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1-23. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68. Kara. [@karaaah]. (2022, November 17). #politics #democrat #republican #fyp #trump #cnn #factcheck [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@karaaah/video/7166715511743483179 Kaye, D. B. V., Zeng, J., & Wikstrom, P. (2022). TikTok: Creativity and culture in short video. John Wiley & Sons. Kemp, S. (2023, January). Digital 2023: Global Overview Report. Retrieved from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2023-global-overview-report Kiersten. [@lambys_nursery]. (2022, August 3). Replying to @yoboi_bray2 its a doll guys #doll #babydoll #dollcollector #factcheck #siliconebaby #fakebaby #siliconebabydoll #siliconedoll #rebornbaby #realisticdoll #lifelikedoll #bebereborn #boneca #fyp #foryou #viral [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@chemteacherphil/video/7008953610872605957 Kiersten. [@lambys_nursery]. (n.d.). [TikTok profile]. TikTok. Retrieved January 5, 2024, from https://tiktok.com/@lambys_nursery Kovach, B., & Rosenstiel, T. (2021). The elements of journalism, revised and updated 4th edition: What newspeople should know and the public should expect. Crown. Kuss, D. J., & Griffiths, M. D. (2017). Social networking sites and addiction: Ten lessons learned. International journal of environmental research and public health, 14(3), 311. Larson, M. G. (2008). Analysis of variance. Circulation, 117(1), 115-121. Lebuda, I., & Glǎveanu, V. P. (Eds.). (2019). The Palgrave handbook of social creativity research. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan. Lee, A. Y., Mieczkowski, H., Ellison, N. B., & Hancock, J. T. (2022). The algorithmic crystal: Conceptualizing the self through algorithmic personalization on TikTok. Human-computer Interaction, 6(CSCW2), 1-22. Lelo, T. (2022). The Rise of the Brazilian fact-checking movement: between economic Sustainability and editorial Independence. Journalism Studies, 23(9), 1077-1095. Lelo, T. (2023). Assessing the consistency of fact-checking in political debates. Journal of Communication, 73(6), 587-600. Levine, T. R., & Hullett, C. R. (2002). Eta squared, partial eta squared, and misreporting of effect size in communication research. Human Communication Research, 28(4), 612-625. Lewandowsky, S., Ecker, U. K. H., & Cook, J. (2017). Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “posttruth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 6(4), 353–369. Lu, Y., & Shen, C. (2023). Unpacking Multimodal Fact-Checking: Features and Engagement of Fact-Checking Videos on Chinese TikTok (Douyin). Social Media+ Society, 9(1). Ma, O., & Feldman, B. (2022, November). How Google and YouTube are investing in fact-checking. Retrieved from https://blog.google/outreach-initiatives/google-news-initiative/how-google-and-youtube-are-investing-in-fact-checking/ Marietta, M., Barker, D. C., & Bowser, T. (2015). Fact-Checking Polarized Politics: Does The Fact-Check Industry Provide Consistent Guidance on Disputed Realities?. The Forum, 13(4), 577-596. MarlboroMan0076. [@marlboroman0076]. (2022, August 12). Replying to @phantomhuntert500 #facts #factcheck #fact #awesome [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@marlboroman0076/video/7130968159804230955 McNair, B. (2018). Fake news: Falsehood, fabrication and fantasy in journalism. New York, NY: Routledge. Mejia, R., Beckermann, K., & Sullivan, C. (2018). White lies: A racial history of the (post) truth. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies, 15(2), 109-126. Meta. (2021, June). How Meta’s third-party fact-checking program works. Retrieved from https://www.facebook.com/formedia/blog/third-party-fact-checking-how-it-works Naeem, S. B., & Bhatti, R. (2020). The Covid‐19 ‘infodemic’: a new front for information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 37(3), 233-239. Naeem, S. B., & Bhatti, R. (2020). The Covid‐19 ‘infodemic’: a new front for information professionals. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 37(3), 233-239. Nagy, P., & Neff, G. (2015). Imagined affordance: Reconstructing a keyword for communication theory. Social Media+ Society, 1(2). Nam S. (2023). NCT 127 Announces Details For 3rd Tour “THE UNITY” In Seoul. Soompi, October,16, 2023. NCT Official. [@official_nct]. (2023, October 20). Check the facts go check that #MARK #HAECHAN #NCT127 #FactCheck #不可思議 #NCT127_FactCheck #NCT127_FactCheck_불가사의 #FactCheck_불가사의_不可思議 #Checkthefacts #NewMusic [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@official_nct/video/7291947034821643522 Norman, D. A. (1988). The psychology of everyday things. Basic books. Nyhan, B., Porter, E., Reifler, J., & Wood, T. J. (2020). Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Political Behavior, 42(3), 939-960. offen un' ehrlich. [@offenunehrlich]. (2023, March 11). Wir werden in der Gemüseabteilung ABGERIPPT?! Ääääh nein! Entwarnung! Seit Monaten geistert ein TikTok durch die Gegend, in dem behauptet wird: Wenn ihr euer Obst und Gemüse selbst abwiegt, schlägt euch die Supermarkt-Waage eiskalt 100 Gramm drauf! Also müsstet ihr deswegen angeblich mehr bezahlen. Das ist aber so nicht richtig, weil die Waage eine Tara-Funktion hat. Das heißt: Die Waage ist extra so eingestellt, dass sie mit der Plastikauflage null anzeigt – weil die Waage die Plastikauflage (die Tara) automatisch abzieht. Ohne Auflage ist die Waage dann im Minus. Die meisten Supermärkte wiegen die Ware übrigens eh direkt an der Kasse für den endgültigen Preis ab. Diese Plastikauflagen-Fake-News sind auch nicht neu. Die gingen schon mal 2018 bei Facebook viral (...die Älteren erinnern sich, lol). Wir haben auch verschiedene Supermärkte gefragt, wofür die Plastikauflage überhaupt da ist. Die haben uns gesagt: Die dient dem Schutz der Waage und der Hygiene, denn das Plastik ist leichter zu reinigen. #Supermarkt #EinkaufHacks #EinkaufTricks #SupermarktWaage #Waage #TaraWaage #Einzelhandel #Abzocke #Einkaufen #Scam #Fake #FakeNews #FactCheck #FakeHacks #SupermarktLife #SupermarktNews #SupermarktFails #SupermarktKasse #SupermarketTikTok #FaktenCheck [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@offenunehrlich/video/7208951012260957446 O'reilly, T. (2007). What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Communications & strategies, (1), 17. Orsek, O., & Ozsoy, F. F. (2020, December). IFCN’s Code of Principles Transparency Report for 2020. Retrieved from https://ifcncodeofprinciples.poynter.org/storage/docs/IFCN-s-Code-of-Principles-Transparency-Report-for-2020.pdf Ortiz-Ospina, E. (2019, September). The rise of social media. Our world in data. Retrieved from https://ourworldindata.org/rise-of-social-media Oxford Languages. (2016, November). Word of the Year 2016. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://languages.oup.com/word-of-the-year/2016/ Pardeshi, H. (2023, March). When Did TikTok Come Out? An Overview of TikTok's History and Why It's Popular. Retrieved from https://www.remote.tools/tiktok/when-did-tiktok-come-out#tiktok-history-the-background-story PolitiFact. [@politifact]. (2022, April 22). Was President Joe Biden trying to shake hands with the air during a recent speech in North Carolina? We found that's False. [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@politifact/video/7089118347505290539 PolitiFact. [@politifact]. (2022, January 25). No, this video of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez wasn’t filmed “days before” her positive COVID-19 test. #aoc #covid19 #learnontiktok [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@politifact/video/7057163379290459439 PolitiFact. [@politifact]. (2022, May 24). As parents grapple with the country’s shortage of baby formula, some politicians are criticizing #Biden for providing #formula to infants detained at the border. But the government has a legal responsibility to provide food for children in its custody. #learnontiktok #factcheck [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@politifact/video/7101005095214779694 PolitiFact. [@politifact]. (2022, November 18). Fact-checking Trump's presidential run announcement at Mar-A-Lago #Trump #LearnOnTikTok #Factcheck [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@politifact/video/7167181014853422382 PolitiFact. [@politifact]. (2023, February 3). Replying to @bigdockmcginnis Did Biden sign away the United State’s sovereignty? That’s what a viral video falsely claims. #unitedstates #biden #sovereignty #LearnOnTikTok #canada #mexico #northamerica #factcheck [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@politifact/video/7195632891336969515 Pyo K. (2023). NCT 127 captures beauty of Seoul with new album ‘Fact Check’. The Korea Times, October,6, 2023. Rauchfleisch, A., Tseng, T. H., Kao, J. J., & Liu, Y. T. (2022). Taiwan’s public discourse about disinformation: The role of journalism, academia, and politics. Journalism Practice, 17(10), 2197-2217. Rich, T. S., Milden, I., & Wagner, M. T. (2020). Research note: Does the public support fact-checking social media? It depends who and how you ask. The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. Rogers, E. M. (1986). Communication technology. New York: Simon & Schuster. Ruak, F. (2023). The Impact of TikTok on Combating and Filtering Hoax News: A Mixed-Methods Study. Kampret Journal, 3(1), 22-32. Ruby, D. (2023, July). Social Media Users In 2023 (Global Demographics). Retrieved from https://www.demandsage.com/social-media-users/ Schellewald, A. (2023). Understanding the popularity and affordances of TikTok through user experiences. Media, Culture & Society. Schreiber, M. (2017). Audiences, aesthetics and affordances analysing practices of visual communication on social media. Digital Culture & Society, 3(2), 143-164. Schrock, A. R. (2015). Communicative affordances of mobile media: Portability, availability, locatability, and multimediality. International Journal of Communication, 9, 18. Schuetz, S. W., Sykes, T. A., & Venkatesh, V. (2021). Combating COVID-19 fake news on social media through fact checking: antecedents and consequences. European Journal of Information Systems, 30(4), 376-388. Shahi, G. K., & Nandini, D. (2020). FakeCovid--A Multilingual Cross-domain Fact Check News Dataset for COVID-19. Shannon M. Clark. [@tiktokbabydoc]. (2023, January 2). #duet with @drjengunter the video by @TeraFeMedSpa is medical misinformation. Listen to the experts like @Heather Irobunda, MD @KarenTangMD @The WhizDoc | Family Medicine who have also addressed this video! #period #menstrualcycle #gynecologist #gynecology #factcheck [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@tiktokbabydoc/video/7183721003317579050 Shin, J., & Thorson, K. (2017). Partisan selective sharing: The biased diffusion of fact-checking messages on social media. Journal of Communication, 67(2), 233-255. Shutsko, A. (2020). User-generated short video content in social media. A case study of TikTok. In Social Computing and Social Media. Participation, User Experience, Consumer Experience, and Applications of Social Computing: 12th International Conference, SCSM 2020, Held as Part of the 22nd HCI International Conference, HCII 2020, Copenhagen, Denmark, July 19–24, 2020, Proceedings, Part II 22 (pp. 108-125). Springer International Publishing. Sidorenko Bautista, P., Alonso-López, N., & Giacomelli, F. (2021). Fact-checking in TikTok. Communication and narrative forms to combat misinformation. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (79), 87-113. Sidorenko Bautista, P., Alonso-López, N., & Giacomelli, F. (2021). Fact-checking in TikTok. Communication and narrative forms to combat misinformation. Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, (79), 87-113. Singer, J. B. (2010). Journalism ethics amid structural change. Daedalus, 139(2), 89-99. Sjöberg, A. (2023). Most viewed TikToks: Top 10 most viewed videos from Zach King to Billie Eilish and lipsyncing. Dextero, December, 13, 2023. Stencel, M. (2017, February). International fact-checking gains ground, Duke census finds. Retrieved from https://reporterslab.org/international-fact-checking-gains-ground/ Stencel, M., Ryan, E., & Luther, J. (2022, June). Fact-checkers extend their global reach with 391 outlets, but growth has slowed. Retrieved from https://reporterslab.org/fact-checkers-extend-their-global-reach-with-391-outlets-but-growth-has-slowed/ Stencel, M., Ryan, E., & Luther, J. (2023, June). Misinformation spreads, but fact-checking has leveled off. Retrieved from https://reporterslab.org/misinformation-spreads-but-fact-checking-has-leveled-off/ Stewart, E. (2021). Detecting fake news: Two problems for content moderation. Philosophy & Technology, 34, 923–940. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00442-x Suárez, E. (2020, March). How fact-checkers are fighting coronavirus misinformation worldwide. Retrieved from https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/risj-review/how-fact-checkers-are-fightingcoronavirus-misinformation-worldwide Swire-Thompson, B., Miklaucic, N., Wihbey, J. P., Lazer, D., & DeGutis, J. (2022). The backfire effect after correcting misinformation is strongly associated with reliability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(7), 1655. The Washington Post. [@washingtonpost]. (2022, March 4). A guide to watching videos with a critical eye. #factcheck [Video]. TikTok. https://www.tiktok.com/@washingtonpost/video/7070939135447584046 Thorson, E. (2016). Belief echoes: The persistent effects of corrected misinformation. Political Communication, 33, 460–480. TikTok. (2020, January). Product tutorial: Reply to comments with video. Retrieved from https://newsroom.tiktok.com/en-us/product-tutorial-reply-to-comments-with-video TikTok. (2022). Introducing more ways to create and connect with TikTok Now. TikTok Newsroom, September, 15, 2022. TikTok. (2023). More Ways for Creators to Collaborate with Brands: TikTok Creative Challenge. TikTok Newsroom, June, 27, 2023. TikTok. (2023). New labels for disclosing AI-generated content. TikTok Newsroom, September, 19, 2023. TikTok. (n.d.). Duets: TikTok Help Center. Retrieved September 10, 2023, from https://support.tiktok.com/en/using-tiktok/creating-videos/duets TikTok. (n.d.). Research API: TikTok for Developers. Retrieved January 1st, 2024, from https://developers.tiktok.com/products/research-api/ TikTok. (n.d.). Stitch: TikTok Help Center. Retrieved September 10, 2023, from https://support.tiktok.com/en/using-tiktok/creating-videos/stitch Treem, J. W., & Leonardi, P. M. (2012). Social media use in organizations: Exploring the affordances of visibility, editability, persistence, and association. Annals of the International Communication Association, 36(1), 143-189. Van Aelst, P., Strömbäck, J., Aalberg, T., Esser, F., De Vreese, C., Matthes, J., ... & Stanyer, J. (2017). Political communication in a high-choice media environment: a challenge for democracy?. Annals of the International Communication Association, 41(1), 3-27. Van Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and communication, 1(1), 2-14. Vida, I. K. (2012). The" Great Moon Hoax" of 1835. Hungarian Journal of English and American Studies (HJEAS), 431-441. Vlachos, A., & Riedel, S. (2014, June). Fact checking: Task definition and dataset construction. In Proceedings of the ACL 2014 workshop on language technologies and computational social science (pp. 18-22). Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350-375. Walter, N., Cohen, J., Holbert, R. L., & Morag, Y. (2020). Fact-checking: A meta-analysis of what works and for whom. Political Communication, 37(3), 350-375. Ward, S. J. (2019). Journalism ethics. The handbook of journalism studies (pp. 307-323). Routledge. Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Díaz, I., & Miyata, K. (2003). The social affordances of the Internet for networked individualism. Journal of computer-mediated communication, 8(3), JCMC834. Wolf Z. B., & Cohen E. (2022). How elections work. Cable News Network, October,29, 2022. World Economic Forum. (2023, January). Global Risk Report 2023. Geneva: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2023.pdf World Health Organization. (2020). Managing the COVID-19 infodemic: Promoting healthy behaviours and mitigating the harm from misinformation and disinformation. Yang, C., Hsu, Y. C., & Tan, S. (2010). Predicting the determinants of users' intentions for using YouTube to share video: moderating gender effects. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 13(2), 141-152. Zeng, J. (2023). # LearnOnTikTok Serendipitously,# LearnOnTikTok Seriously. JCMS: Journal of Cinema and Media Studies, 62(4), 174-180. Zhang, J., Featherstone, J. D., Calabrese, C., & Wojcieszak, M. (2021). Effects of fact-checking social media vaccine misinformation on attitudes toward vaccines. Preventive Medicine, 145, 106408. | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92155 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | TikTok 是當前全球崛起最快速的社群媒體平台之一。事實查核是當代被廣泛應用於打擊錯假資訊的策略之一。探索與了解事實查核影音在 TikTok 平台傳播的景觀與能供性，料能有助於管控錯假資訊在社群媒體平台上的散播。本研究在 TikTok 平台蒐集來自 60 位不同創作者、共 248 則事實查核影音，透過內容分析、變異數分析 (ANOVA) 等方法，探索事實查核內容的 TikTok 景觀與平台能供性。 ANOVA 結果顯示，在 TikTok 平台上有兩項足以影響事實查核影音傳播的重要因素，分別是影片內容的主題類型，以及平台內建功能｢合拍 (Duet) ｣；合拍又被學者視為｢社交創意特徵 (socially creative features) ｣能供性的一種。內容分析的結果顯示：（一）政治、生活風格、健康分別是前三大 TikTok 事實查核影音的主題類型；（二）原始音訊、多音軌、字幕是 TikTok 事實查核影音的重要平台能供性特徵；（三）事實查核機構、網紅是在 TikTok 平台上發布事實查核影音的兩大要角。本研究認為， TikTok 的社交創意特徵能夠有效增進影音內容的多樣性，以及用戶之間的社交網路連結。 TikTok 平台當前已經跳脫出以視覺傳播為主的社群媒體平台之審美觀限制，展現出由短影音型式所主導的獨特能供性。而短影音型式、｢可知覺之能供性 (perceived affordance) ｣是造就 TikTok 獨特能供性的背後原因。本研究也觀察到， TikTok 平台在主題標籤的使用上，不僅只停留在｢宏觀層面能供性 (macro-layer affordance)｣。同時，本研究建議 TikTok 採取更有彈性、更多樣化的方法，增進事實查核影音在平台上的傳播；舉例來說，推出一款挑戰類型的應用程式內建功能選項。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Fact-checking is the most popular strategy to combat misinformation, and TikTok is the most rising social media platform worldwide. Understanding the landscape of fact-checking videos on TikTok can be an effective path to manage the damage from the spread of misinformation through this social media. This study examined 248 TikTok from 60 unique creators by content analysis and analysis of variance (ANOVA). The ANOVA result identifies two significant factors Duet and content topic in fact-checking TikTok posts. Results of the content analysis showed that (1) political issues, lifestyle, and health issues as the top three content topics; (2) the original audio, multiple soundtracks, and subtitle traits as the momentous affordance; (3) the fact-checking organizations and influencers as the two main characters in launching fact-checking videos. Results suggested TikTok's socially creative features are both designed to increase content diversity and to create social networks. TikTok is beyond the limitation of the aesthetics of visual communication and exhibits its unique affordance led by the short-form format. The concept of perceived affordance and the short-formed video are the possible reasons behind the results. This study also found that hashtag usage on TikTok did not just stay in the macro-layer affordance. Furthermore, this study suggests a varied and flexible fact-checking approach on TikTok, such as a challenge-type in-app function to promote fact-checking videos on TikTok. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-07T16:20:20Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-07T16:20:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 口試委員會審定書 i
中文摘要 ii Abstract iii List of Figures iv List of Tables v I. Introduction 1 II. Literature Review 3 2.1 False information and fact-check 3 2.2 Fact-checking and social media 8 2.3 Social media and affordances 12 2.4 Affordances and fact-checking on TikTok 17 III. Methods 22 3.1 Research Question 22 3.2 Data Collection 23 3.3 Measurement 25 3.3.1 Engagement 25 3.4 Content analysis 26 3.4.1 Audio Use 27 3.4.2 Post-Production 27 3.4.3 Creator profile 28 3.4.4 Content topic 29 3.4.5 Record type 29 3.4.6 Creator gender 30 3.4.7 Creator age 30 3.5 Analysis of variance (ANOVA) 31 3.6 Comparative analysis 32 IV. Results 34 4.1 RQ1: Platform affordances and features 35 4.2 RQ2: Content and creator traits 38 4.3 RQ3: Platform features and social engagement 43 4.4 RQ4: Difference between #factcheck and @politifact contents 45 V. Discussion 59 VI. Conclusion 64 References 68 | - |
| dc.language.iso | en | - |
| dc.title | 由社群媒體能供性探討TikTok事實查核影音之景觀 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | A TikTok-based study to understand #factcheck use and SNSs affordance | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 許詩嫺;謝吉隆 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Shih-Hsien Hsu;Ji-Lung Hsieh | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 事實查核,TikTok,能供性,社群媒體,內容分析,變異數分析, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | fact-checking,TikTok,affordance,social media,content analysis,ANOVA, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 85 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400601 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-18 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 社會科學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 新聞研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 新聞研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf | 2.22 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。