請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92106完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 黃宗儀 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Tsung-yi Huang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 鄭力豪 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Li-Hao Cheng | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-05T16:18:57Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-03-06 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-03-05 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2024 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-14 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ahmed, S. (2014). The Cultural Politics of Emotion (NED-New edition, 2). Edinburgh University Press.
Allen, L., Fenaughty, J., & Cowie, L. (2022). Thinking with new materialism about ‘safe-un-safe’campus space for LGBTTIQA+ students. Social & Cultural Geography, 23(5), 757-773. Binnie, J., & Skeggs, B. (2004). Cosmopolitan knowledge and the production and consumption of sexualized space: Manchester''s gay village. The Sociological Review, 52(1), 39-61. Boorstin, D. J. (1992). The image: A guide to pseudo-events in America. Vintage. Bruni, A., & Esposito, F. M. (2019). It obliges you to do things you normally wouldn''t: Organizing and consuming private life in the age of Airbnb. Partecipazione e conflitto, 12(3), 665-690. Chasin, A. (2000). Selling out: The gay and lesbian movement goes to market. New York: Palgrave Macmillan. Chen, D. J. (2012). Global concept, local practice: Taiwanese experience of CouchSurfing. Hospitality & Society, 1(3), 279-297. Chen, D. J. (2017). Gendered Couchsurfing: women from Western Europe and East-Asia contesting de-sexualised cosmopolitanism. Gender, Place & Culture, 24(8), 1090-1106. Cheng, M., & Foley, C. (2018). The sharing economy and digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 70, 95-98. Coles, T., Duval, D. T., & Hall, C. M. (2012). Tourism, mobility, and global communities: New approaches to theorising tourism and tourist spaces. In Global tourism (pp. 463-481). Routledge. Edelman, B., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D. (2017). Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. American economic journal: applied economics, 9(2), 1-22. Edwards, D., & Lang, H. (2018). Entanglements that Matter. Circulation, writing, and rhetoric, 118-134. Gallagher, L.（2018）Airbnb 創業生存法則，洪慧芳譯，臺北市：天下雜誌。（原著出版於 2017 年） Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Bantam Doubleday Dell Publishing Group. Gorman-Murray, A. (2008). Reconciling self: Gay men and lesbians using domestic materiality for identity management. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(3), 283-301. Hartal, G. (2020). Touring and obscuring: how sensual, embodied and haptic gay touristic practices construct the geopolitics of pinkwashing. Social & Cultural Geography, 1-19. Hochschild, A.R. (2003). The Managed Heart: Commercialization of Human Feeling. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press. Hsu, C. Y., & Yen, C. F. (2017). Taiwan: Pioneer of the health and well-being of sexual minorities in Asia. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(6), 1577-1579. Hughes, H. (1997). Holidays and homosexual identity. Tourism management, 18(1), 3-7. Kadi, J., Plank, L., & Seidl, R. (2019). Airbnb as a tool for inclusive tourism?. Tourism Geographies, 1-23. Khamis, S., & Lambert, A. (2016). Effeminacy and expertise, excess and equality: Gay best friends as consumers and commodities in contemporary television. In Consumerism on TV (pp. 109-126). Routledge. Knaus, K. (2020). At home with guests–discussing hosting on airbnb through the lens of labour. Applied Mobilities, 5(1), 68-85. Ladegaard, I. (2018). Hosting the comfortably exotic: Cosmopolitan aspirations in the sharing economy. The Sociological Review, 66(2), 381-400. Lee, P. H. (2020). Multiplicity of queer activism in East Asia: A cosmopolitan imagination for justices. Advances in sociology research, 30, 37-64 MacCannell, D. (1973). Staged authenticity: Arrangements of social space in tourist settings. American journal of Sociology, 79(3), 589-603. Molz, J. G. (2008). Global abode: Home and mobility in narratives of round-the-world travel. Space and culture, 11(4), 325-342. Molz, J. G. (2016). Cosmopolitans on the couch: Mobile hospitality and the Internet. Mobilizing hospitality: The ethics of social relations in a mobile world, 65-80. Routledge. O’Regan, M., & Choe, J. (2017). Airbnb and cultural capitalism: Enclosure and control within the sharing economy. Anatolia, 28(2), 163-172. Peters, D. (2016). Density wars in Silicon Beach: the struggle to mix new spaces for toil, stay and play in Santa Monica, California. In Protest and resistance in the tourist city (pp. 104-120). Routledge. Pilkey, B. (2014). Queering heteronormativity at home: older gay Londoners and the negotiation of domestic materiality. Gender, Place & Culture, 21(9), 1142-1157. Puar, J.K. (2002). Circuits of Queer Mobility: Tourism, Travel, and Globalization. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 8(1), 101-137 Puar, J.K. (2006) Mapping US Homonormativities, Gender, Place & Culture, 13(1), 67-88 Ritchie, J. (2015). Pinkwashing, homonationalism, and Israel–Palestine: The conceits of queer theory and the politics of the ordinary. Antipode, 47(3), 616-634. Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. Global modernities, 2(1), 25-44. Robinson, B. A. (2016). Heteronormativity and homonormativity. The Wiley Blackwell encyclopedia of gender and sexuality studies, 1-3. Roelofsen, M. (2018). Performing “home” in the sharing economies of tourism: the Airbnb experience in Sofia, Bulgaria. Fennia-International Journal of Geography, 196(1), 24-42. Roelofsen, M., & Minca, C. (2018). The Superhost. Biopolitics, home and community in the Airbnb dream-world of global hospitality. Geoforum, 91, 170-181. Saturnino, R., & Sousa, H. (2019). Hosting as a lifestyle: The case of Airbnb digital platform and Lisbon hosts. Partecipazione e conflitto, 12(3), 794-818 Sánchez-Soriano, J. J., & García-Jiménez, L. (2020). The media construction of LGBT+ characters in Hollywood blockbuster movies. The use of pinkwashing and queerbaiting. Revista latina de comunicación social, 77, 95-115. Spangler, I. (2020). Hidden value in the platform’s platform: Airbnb, displacement, and the un‐homing spatialities of emotional labour. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 45(3), 575-588. Swain, M.B. (2009) The Cosmopolitan Hope of Tourism: Critical Action and Worldmaking Vistas, Tourism Geographies, 11(4), 505-525 Toeniskoetter, C. (2013). Hospitality Exchange: Overcoming safety, trust, and gender concerns in the Couchsurfing community (Doctoral dissertation). Törnberg, P. (2022). Platform placemaking and the digital urban culture of Airbnbification. Urban Transformations, 4(1), 1-26. Urry, J. (1995). Consuming Places. Routledge. Urry, J., & Larsen, J. (2011). The tourist gaze 3.0. Sage. Usai, R., Cai, W., & Wassler, P. (2022). A queer perspective on heteronormativity for LGBT travelers. Journal of Travel Research, 61(1), 3-15. Wahab, A. (2021). “The darker the fruit”? Homonationalism, racialized homophobia, and neoliberal tourism in the St Lucian–US contact zone. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 23(1), 80-101. Warner, M. (1991). Introduction: Fear of a queer planet. Social text, 3-17. Weenink, D. (2008). Cosmopolitanism as a form of capital: Parents preparing their children for a globalizing world. Sociology, 42(6), 1089-1106. Winer, C., & Bolzendahl, C. (2021). Conceptualizing homonationalism: (Re‐) Formulation, application, and debates of expansion. Sociology Compass, 15(5), e12853. Yang, E. C. L., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Arcodia, C. (2018). Power and empowerment: How Asian solo female travellers perceive and negotiate risks. Tourism Management, 68, 32-45. Young, I. M. (2005). House and home: Feminist variations on a theme. In Motherhood and space (pp. 115-147). Palgrave Macmillan, New York. Yue, A., & Leung, H. H. S. (2017). Notes towards the queer Asian city: Singapore and Hong Kong. Urban Studies, 54(3), 747-764. 朱偉誠（2003）。同志．台灣：性公民、國族建構或公民社會。女學學誌：婦女與性別研究，15，115-151。 江語喬（2011）。既健康又陽光:旅遊作為同志生活的實踐。高雄醫學大學性別研究所碩士論文，高雄市。 佘昌翰（2015）。共享經濟平台下的信任機制之個案分析-以Airbnb為例。國立中央大學產業經濟研究所碩士論文，桃園市。 余承瑋（2021）。同性婚姻，誰來決定？《司法院釋字第七四八號解釋施行法》立法過程及不同場域／行動者的行動邏輯。國立清華大學社會學研究所碩士論文，新竹市。 李欣（2015）。共享經濟的困境與限制─以Airbnb為例。國立政治大學科技管理與智慧財產研究所碩士論文，臺北市。 李宇文（2020）。從具陰柔特質的男同志之生命故事探討台灣男同志圈的陽剛霸權意識。國立政治大學國家發展研究所碩士論文，臺北市。 林子云（2020）。世代差異對臺灣民眾在同性婚姻議題態度之影響。國立臺灣師範大學東亞學系碩士論文，臺北市。 林珮婷（2020）。誰支持婚姻平權？探索臺灣婚姻平權的支持基礎。人文及社會科學集刊，32(2)，207-238。 紀大偉（2002）。同性戀政治經濟學—認同與消費。中外文學，31(4)，69-90。 胡郁盈（2018a）何以為「家」？：酷兒全球化中的同志與家庭。載於陳美華、王秀雲、黃于玲（主編）。欲望性公民：同性親密公民權讀本。巨流圖書公司。 胡郁盈（2018b）。認同不停轉換，類別不能不分：社群網站、跨國文化政治、與 「T婆／不分」女同志認同型塑。臺灣人類學刊，16(1)，1-50。 施馨喜（2020）。共享經濟之影響:以 Airbnb 與台灣旅宿業為例。國立中正大學經濟系國際經濟學研究所碩士論文，嘉義縣。 徐淑美（2005）。台北地區男同志族群出國旅遊動機與需求之研究。中國文化大學觀光休閒事業管理研究所碩士論文，臺北市。 高梅心（2007）。台灣同志族群出國旅遊動機與目的地之研究。世新大學觀光學研究所（含碩專班）碩士論文。臺北市。 高穎超（2020）。陽剛氣質新觀點（上）：「粉紅口罩共識」 與霸權／王道陽剛氣質。性別平等教育季刊，91，30-39。 高穎超（2021）。陽剛氣質新觀點（下）：包容性與雜衝性陽剛氣質。性別平等教育季刊，92，140-151。 張娟芬（2011）。愛的自由式：女同志故事書（十年典藏版）。臺北：時報。 陳金燕（2017）。釋字第748號解釋與校園性別平等教育。婦研縱橫，107，74-81。 陳宜雯（2019）。探索同志粉紅旅遊商機： 同志族群的國外旅遊動機及目的地。國立中正大學企業管理系研究所碩士論文，嘉義縣。 莊璧菁（2019）。「創意觀光之「家」的旅遊體驗——以台灣人入住歐洲Airbnb為例」。國立臺灣師範大學歐洲文化與觀光研究所碩士論文。臺北市。 楊又欣（2011）。性／別觀光—台灣男同志之歐洲想像與身體展演。國立臺灣師範大學歐洲文化與觀光研究所碩士論文。臺北市。 臺北市政府觀光傳播局（2016年3月9日）。FM93.1臺北電臺獨家訪問！旅宿臺北保平安-日租套房稽查員的終極使命。臺北市政府觀光傳播局。取自：https://www.tpedoit.gov.taipei/News_Content.aspx?n=603755835E928BED&sms=72544237BBE4C5F6&s=18C92ED2926B9E16。取用日期：2024年2月5日。 劉人鵬（2011）。打造一個夠落後的烏托邦：海澀愛的污名連線政治與罔兩問景。文化研究，13，266-280。 蔡文宜（2021）。台灣旅宿產業管制政策與法制研究:以民宿產業發展為中心。國立政治大學法律學系博士論文。臺北市。 錢龍（2018）。共享經濟在不同文化背景下的研究：以Airbnb為實例。國立臺灣大學資訊管理學研究所碩士論文。臺北市。 遲恒昌、張均鈺（2021）。臺灣同志遊行與 2019 年國際觀光客參與動機。性別平等教育季刊，92，126-130。 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/92106 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Airbnb作為全球共享住宿最大的供應者，儘管未在台灣未正式合法化，卻在台灣觀光產業中具有一定程度的影響力。值得注意的是，台灣Airbnb平台上正有一批房東，自主地在簡介中標籤「性別友善」。甚至，房東社群內部更發展出性別倡議的團體——Airbnb LGBT Community，在在呼應台灣近年來性別平權運動的發展。為理解台灣Airbnb平台上性別友善房東／團體的特性及所造成的影響，本研究透過深入訪談15名Airbnb性別友善房東，以及親自入住性別友善旅宿，得出以下研究發現：性別友善房東願意克服各種困難、持續經營的動機，主要是受到Airbnb帶來的跨文化交流所吸引，並逐漸發展出規避政府稽查的經營策略。另一方面，房東們雖能肩負起在Airbnb世界主義論述下被分配的在地嚮導角色，卻會在面對房客時展演出不同層次的地方後台，凸顯出地方純正性的矛盾。接待上則有以下三大特性：其一，性少數房東在性傾向的揭露上，仰賴與房客之間的互動。若是房客沒有主動提及性別相關的話題，性少數房東並不一定會主動談論自身的性向，此時便與一般的共享住宿交易無異。其二，性別友善的Airbnb房源，實則是房東透過物件來表達自我身分認同的空間，並在接待中展演出對於家的想像。其三，面對性及性別的人身安全危險與困擾，房東能夠自主發展出生存與經營上的策略，避免與房客之間的不愉快及獲得負評。最後，透過爬梳Airbnb LGBT Community成立的脈絡以及微觀性別友善房源中非人物件的能動性，本研究發現，正是在台灣獨特的性別運動脈絡下，性別友善旅宿的經濟市場才得以成立，並催生出性別倡議的房東團體。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Airbnb, as the world''s largest provider of shared accommodations, holds a certain level of influence in Taiwan''s tourism industry, despite not being legalized. Notably, there is a group of Taiwanese Airbnb hosts who voluntarily label their listings as LGBT-Friendly in their profiles. Moreover, within the host community, a LGBT advocacy group “Airbnb LGBT Community” has emerged, in line with the recent developments in Taiwan''s queer activism. To comprehend the characteristics and the impact of Taiwanese LGBT-Friendly hosts and advocacy group, this study conducted in-depth interviews with 15 Airbnb LGBT-Friendly hosts and personally stayed at LGBT-Friendly Airbnb, unveiling several pivotal insights. Primarily, these hosts are attracted by the cosmopolitanism of Airbnb, motivating them to overcome many obstacles and develop strategies to evade government inspections. While these hosts can assume the role of local guides assigned by the Airbnb cosmopolitan discourse, they may exhibit different levels of authenticity when interacting with guests, accentuating the debates of staged authenticity. Moving on to LGBT-Friendly hospitality, there are three main characteristics: Firstly, sexual minority hosts rely on interactions with guests for the disclosure of their sexual orientation. If guests do not bring up gender-related topics, they don’t necessarily discuss their own sexual orientation. Secondly, LGBT-Friendly Airbnb listings serve as spaces where hosts express their self-identity through objects, showcasing their performing of home during the reception. Lastly, facing potential safety risks and conflicts related to gender and sexuality, hosts can develop their own strategies. These strategies aim to avoid unpleasant experiences with guests and negative reviews. Finally, by examining the context of the establishment of “Airbnb LGBT Community” and the agency of domestic materiality, this study reveals that it is within the unique context of Taiwan’s queer activism that the economic market for LGBT Friendly accommodations has emerged, giving rise to LGBT advocacy group formed by Airbnb hosts. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-03-05T16:18:57Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-03-05T16:18:57Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 ii
摘要 iv Abstract v 第一章、 緒論 1 第一節、問題意識與研究問題 1 第二節、文獻回顧 5 第三節、研究設計與方法 14 第二章、 既全球又在地的房東身分：經營動機、收穫與挑戰 21 第一節、房東的世界主義實踐 24 第二節、房東的地方實踐 35 第三節、政府稽查與Airbnb評價機制交織的經營壓力 48 第四節、小結 65 第三章、 性別友善的接待實作 67 第一節、官方世界主義論述與實際經營中的落差：人身安全的協商 69 第二節、官方世界主義論述與實際經營中的落差：異性戀正典化的協商 72 第三節、「性別友善」卻仍受性別影響的接待實作 82 第四節、非性少數房東的性別反思 95 第五節、小結 100 第四章、 性別友善的社會文化脈絡：Airbnb房東社群內的性別倡議團體與接待中非人物件的能動性 103 第一節、Airbnb世界主義政策與台灣婚姻平權運動的交錯：房東社群內部性別倡議團體的凝聚與現身 104 第二節、Airbnb官方在粉紅經濟上的經營 113 第三節、與物件共構的性別友善空間：標籤的多義性與物件的情動 119 第四節、小結 127 第五章、 結論 130 第一節、研究發現與討論 130 第二節、研究限制與研究建議 133 參考文獻 135 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 性別友善的待客之道：台灣Airbnb房東的經營策略、接待實作與性別倡議 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | LGBT-Friendly Airbnb Hosts in Taiwan: Hosting Strategies, Hospitality Practices, and LGBT Advocacy | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 劉文;遲恒昌 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wen Liu;Heng-Chang Chi | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | Airbnb,性別友善旅宿,性別友善,粉紅經濟,世界主義,性別倡議,接待實作, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | Airbnb,LGBT-Friendly,Airbnb hosts,hospitality,hosting strategies,cosmopolitan,pink economy, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 141 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400656 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-17 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 理學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 地理環境資源學系 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 地理環境資源學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf | 16.07 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。