Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
    • 指導教授
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 公共衛生學院
  3. 健康行為與社區科學研究所
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91883
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor張書森zh_TW
dc.contributor.advisorShu-Sen Changen
dc.contributor.author沈治祖zh_TW
dc.contributor.authorChet-Joe Simen
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-26T16:16:37Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-27-
dc.date.copyright2024-02-26-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.date.submitted2023-12-25-
dc.identifier.citationAjzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2020). Changing Behavior Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. In L. D. Cameron, M. S. Hagger, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The Handbook of Behavior Change (pp. 17-31). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.002
Aseltine, R. H., Jr., & DeMartino, R. (2004). An outcome evaluation of the SOS Suicide Prevention Program. Am J Public Health, 94(3), 446-451. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.94.3.446
Aseltine, R. H., Jr., James, A., Schilling, E. A., & Glanovsky, J. (2007). Evaluating the SOS suicide prevention program: a replication and extension. BMC Public Health, 7, 161. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-7-161
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol, 52(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1
Bandura, A. (2004). Health promotion by social cognitive means. Health Educ Behav, 31(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198104263660
Bandura, A. (2006). Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales. In Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents (Vol. 5, pp. 307-337).
Brewer, L. (2001). Gender socialization and the cultural construction of elder caregivers. Journal of Aging Studies, 15(3), 217-235. https://doi.org/Doi 10.1016/S0890-4065(01)00020-2
Burnette, C., Ramchand, R., & Ayer, L. (2015). Gatekeeper Training for Suicide Prevention: A Theoretical Model and Review of the Empirical Literature. RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR1002.html
Burton, L. J., & Mazerolle, S. M. (2011). Survey instrument validity part I: Principles of survey instrument development and validation in athletic training education research. Athletic Training Education Journal, 6(1), 27-35.
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. Multivariate Behav Res, 1(2), 245-276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
Cerny, B. A., & Kaiser, H. F. (1977). A Study Of A Measure Of Sampling Adequacy For Factor-Analytic Correlation Matrices. Multivariate Behav Res, 12(1), 43-47. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1201_3
Chang, S. S., Sterne, J. A., Wheeler, B. W., Lu, T. H., Lin, J. J., & Gunnell, D. (2011). Geography of suicide in Taiwan: spatial patterning and socioeconomic correlates. Health Place, 17(2), 641-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2011.01.003
Chen, S.-S., & Lai, T.-Y. (2023). A relational study of psychological contract fulfillment, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior on lifeline telephone crisis supporter (TCS) volunteers in Taiwan. AIP Conference Proceedings,
Child, D. (2006). The Essentials of Factor Analysis. 3nd edn ed. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Clark, T. R., Matthieu, M. M., Ross, A., & Knox, K. L. (2010). Training Outcomes from the Samaritans of New York Suicide Awareness and Prevention Programme Among Community- and School-based Staff. Br J Soc Work, 40(7), 2223-2238. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcq016
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (2013). A First Course in Factor Analysis.
Cross, W., Matthieu, M. M., Cerel, J., & Knox, K. L. (2007). Proximate outcomes of gatekeeper training for suicide prevention in the workplace. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 37(6), 659-670. https://doi.org/10.1521/suli.2007.37.6.659
Deane, F. P., Capp, K., Jones, C., de Ramirez, D., Lambert, G., Marlow, B., Rees, A., & Sullivan, E. (2006). Two-year follow-up of a community gatekeeper suicide prevention program in an Aboriginal community. The Australian Journal of Rehabilitation Counselling, 12(1), 33-36.
Department of Household Registration, M.O.I. Republic of China(Taiwan),. 02. Population Aged 15 and Over by Age and Educational Attainment (for Counties and Cities). Taiwan Retrieved from https://www.ris.gov.tw/app/portal/346
Dept. of Household Registration, Ministry of the Interior, Republic of China(Taiwan). (2023). 2021 percent distribution of population by sex and five age group. In 01. percent distribution of population by sex and five age group (Ed.). Taiwan: Ministry of the Interior.
Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (4th ed.). London: SAGE.
Gagnon, J., & Hasking, P. A. (2020). Australian psychologists' attitudes towards suicide and self‐harm. Australian Journal of Psychology, 64(2), 75-82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-9536.2011.00030.x
Griffiths, K. M., Christensen, H., & Jorm, A. F. (2009). Mental health literacy as a function of remoteness of residence: an Australian national study. BMC Public Health, 9(1), 92. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-9-92
Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol, 46(12), 1417-1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-n
Hair Jr, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. (2011). Multivariate Data Analysis. New Jersey: PrenticeHall. In: Inc.
Hawgood, J., Woodward, A., Quinnett, P., & De Leo, D. (2022). Gatekeeper Training and Minimum Standards of Competency. Crisis, 43(6), 516-522. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000794
Horn, J. L. (1965). A Rationale and Test for the Number of Factors in Factor Analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
Huang, K. C., Jeang, S.-R., Hsieh, H.-L., Chen, J.-W., Yi, C.-H., Chiang, Y.-C., & Wu, H.-P. (2023). Survey of knowledge, self-efficacy, and attitudes toward suicide prevention among nursing staff. BMC medical education, 23(1), 1-10.
Hwang, I. T., Gao, Y. M., Chang, S. S., Chi, Y. C., Wu, K. C., & Chen, Y. Y. (2023). Intentions to Help People at Risk of Suicide and Associated Factors: A National Telephone Survey in Taiwan. Arch Suicide Res, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13811118.2023.2280231
Hwang, I. T., Shaw, F. F., Hsu, W. Y., Kuan, C. I., Liu, G. Y., & Chang, S. S. (2023). New COVID-19 challenges and response strategies adopted by a national suicide prevention hotline: A qualitative study. Death Stud, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2023.2186535
Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and psychological measurement, 20(1), 141-151.
Kaur, N., Ricciardelli, R., & Clow, K. (2022). Men in Nursing: A Qualitative Examination of Students’ Stereotypes of Male Nurses through the Framework of Social Role Theory and Stereotype Content Model. The Journal of Men’s Studies, 31(1), 157-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/10608265221108209
Kelder, S. H., Hoelscher, D., & Perry, C. L. (2015). How individuals, environments, and health behaviors interact: Social Cognitive Theory. In Health behavior: Theory, research, and practice, 5th ed. (pp. 159-181). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
Kerr, S., Martin, C., & Fleming, M. (2018). Preventing suicide; nurse education and the occluded issue of gender. Nurse Educ Pract, 32, 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.07.004
King, K. A., & Smith, J. (2000). Project SOAR: a training program to increase school counselors' knowledge and confidence regarding suicide prevention and intervention. J Sch Health, 70(10), 402-407. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2000.tb07227.x
Loo, P. W., & Furnham, A. (2012). Public knowledge and beliefs about depression among urban and rural Chinese in Malaysia. Asian J Psychiatr, 5(3), 236-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajp.2012.02.003
Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2020). Changing Behavior Using Social Cognitive Theory. In L. D. Cameron, M. S. Hagger, K. Hamilton, N. Hankonen, & T. Lintunen (Eds.), The Handbook of Behavior Change (pp. 32-45). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108677318.003
Lygnugaryte-Griksiene, A., Leskauskas, D., Jasinskas, N., & Masiukiene, A. (2017). Factors influencing the suicide intervention skills of emergency medical services providers. Med Educ Online, 22(1), 1291869. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2017.1291869
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2023a). 2022 Cause of Death Statistics. https://www.mohw.gov.tw/cp-16-74869-1.html
Ministry of Health and Welfare. (2023b). Annual suicide statistics in Taiwan (Until 2022). https://dep.mohw.gov.tw/domhaoh/cp-4904-8883-107.html
Montiel, C., & Mishara, B. L. (2023a). Evaluation of the outcomes of the Quebec provincial suicide prevention gatekeeper training on knowledge, recognition of attitudes, perceived self-efficacy, intention to help, and helping behaviors. Suicide Life Threat Behav, n/a(n/a). https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.13022
Montiel, C., & Mishara, B. L. (2023b). A qualitative study of factors involved in the helping behaviors of suicide prevention gatekeepers. Death Stud, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2023.2246018
Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. sage publications.
Nicholas, A., Pirkis, J., Jorm, A., Spittal, M. J., & Reavley, N. (2019). Helping actions given and received in response to suicide risk: Findings from an Australian nationally representative telephone survey. SSM Popul Health, 9, 100483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssmph.2019.100483
Nicholas, A., Pirkis, J., & Reavley, N. (2022). What responses do people at risk of suicide find most helpful and unhelpful from professionals and non-professionals? J Ment Health, 31(4), 496-505. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638237.2020.1818701
Nicholas, A., Pirkis, J., Rossetto, A., Jorm, A., Spittal, M., & Reavley, N. (2020). Confidence and Intentions to Help a Person at Risk of Suicide. Suicide Life Threat Behav, 50(1), 138-150. https://doi.org/10.1111/sltb.12575
O'Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and velicer's MAP test. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput, 32(3), 396-402. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03200807
Overholser, J. C., Hemstreet, A. H., Spirito, A., & Vyse, S. (1989). Suicide awareness programs in the schools: effects of gender and personal experience. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 28(6), 925-930. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198911000-00018
Owens, C., Derges, J., & Abraham, C. (2019). Intervening to prevent a suicide in a public place: a qualitative study of effective interventions by lay people. BMJ Open, 9(11), e032319. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032319
Reise, S. P., Waller, N. G., & Comrey, A. L. (2000). Factor analysis and scale revision. Psychol Assess, 12(3), 287-297. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.12.3.287
Rossetto, A., Jorm, A. F., & Reavley, N. J. (2016). Predictors of adults' helping intentions and behaviours towards a person with a mental illness: A six-month follow-up study. Psychiatry Res, 240, 170-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.037
Sandford, D. M., Kirtley, O. J., Thwaites, R., Dagnan, D., & O'Connor, R. C. (2023). The Adaptation of a Measure of Confidence in Assessing, Formulating, and Managing Suicide Risk. Crisis, 44(1), 70-77. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000830
Shim, R. S., & Compton, M. T. (2010). Pilot testing and preliminary evaluation of a suicide prevention education program for emergency department personnel. Community Ment Health J, 46(6), 585-590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-009-9241-4
Spirito, A., Overholser, J., Ashworth, S., Morgan, J., & Benedict-Drew, C. (1988). Evaluation of a suicide awareness curriculum for high school students. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry, 27(6), 705-711. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004583-198811000-00007
SPSS, I. (2013). IBM SPSS statistics for windows. Armonk, New York, USA: IBM SPSS, 2, 119.
Sylvara, A. L., & Mandracchia, J. T. (2019). An Investigation of Gatekeeper Training and Self-Efficacy for Suicide Intervention Among College/University Faculty. Crisis, 40(6), 383-389. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000577
Takahashi, A., Tachikawa, H., Morita, N., Aiba, M., Shiratori, Y., Nemoto, K., & Arai, T. (2021). Suicide Prevention Gatekeeper Self-Efficacy Scale (GKSES). Crisis, 42(2), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000698
Tompkins, T. L., & Witt, J. (2009). The short-term effectiveness of a suicide prevention gatekeeper training program in a college setting with residence life advisers. J Prim Prev, 30(2), 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10935-009-0171-2
Wang, Y. T., Chang, S. S., Chi, Y. C., Wu, K. C. C., & Chen, Y. Y. (2022). Suicide Misconceptions and Attitudes Toward Suicide Prevention Measures in Taiwan A National Survey Study. Crisis-the Journal of Crisis Intervention and Suicide Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a000893
Wild, D., Grove, A., Martin, M., Eremenco, S., McElroy, S., Verjee-Lorenz, A., Erikson, P., Translation, I. T. F. f., & Cultural, A. (2005). Principles of Good Practice for the Translation and Cultural Adaptation Process for Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) Measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health, 8(2), 94-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4733.2005.04054.x
World Health Organization. (2014). Preventing suicide: A global imperative. World Health Organization.
World Health Organization. (2023). Suicide. Retrieved 20 September 2023 from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/suicide
Wu, H.-T., Wu, C.-Y., Lee, M.-B., Lu, F.-M., Ho, T.-K., & Wang, S.-W. (2023). Effectiveness of mental health and suicide prevention course in northern Taiwan. Taiwan Journal of Public Health, 42(2), 233-250. https://doi.org/10.6288/tjph.202304_42(2).111116
Wyman, P. A., Brown, C. H., Inman, J., Cross, W., Schmeelk-Cone, K., Guo, J., & Pena, J. B. (2008). Randomized trial of a gatekeeper program for suicide prevention: 1-year impact on secondary school staff. J Consult Clin Psychol, 76(1), 104-115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.76.1.104
-
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91883-
dc.description.abstract研究背景:過往針對一般民眾的自殺防治守門人自我效能(SE)之研究有限。
研究目的:本研究旨在探索臺灣一般成年民眾中文版的守門人自我效能量表(GKSES)之因素結構, 此量表共有9則子題;同時,本研究亦對守門人自我效能與助人信心及意圖之間的關係。
研究方法:本研究使用之資料來自2022年一項臺灣全國代表性電話調查,有效問卷共997份。研究首先以探索性因素分析(exploratory factor analysis)測量中文版GKSES的潛在因素,然後運用羅吉斯迴歸(logistic regression)分析自我效能與助人信心及意圖之間的關係。
研究發現:根據初步的因素分析萃取得出的二因子架構,據此將中文版GKSES分成SE-skill以及SE-knowledge兩個次量表。SE-skill(技巧)由五項與自殺風險偵測及因應技巧有關的題目所構成,SE-knowledge(知識)由四項與憂鬱、自殺及高自殺風險者可使用之資源的知識題目所構成。控制共變項及SE子量表後,SE-skill與助人信心及所有助人意圖(包括三項被建議的助人行動以及兩項不被建議的助人行動)呈正相關;SE-knowledge與助人信心及意圖採取一項被建議的助人行動(會幫助對方找專業人員,例如心理師、身心科醫師)呈正相關。
研究結論:自殺防治守門人培訓及訓練課程需著重加強一般民眾運用直接問句詢問自殺風險,以及清楚傳達「不建議這樣做」的訊息,例如:不應試圖說服對方自殺是不對的、或告訴對方自殺會令家人和朋友傷心。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractBackground: There were limited previous investigations of the gatekeeper self-efficacy (SE) in the general population.
Aims: This study aimed to explore the factor structure of the Mandarin version of the nine-item Gatekeeper Self-Efficacy Scale (GKSES), and their associations with helping confidence and intentions in the Taiwanese adult population.
Methods: Data was extracted from a nationally representative computer-assisted telephone survey conducted in 2022 (n=997). Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to examine the factor structure of the Mandarin version of the GKSES. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the associations between gatekeeper SE and helping confidence and intentions.
Results: The EFA yielded a two-factor structure, and accordingly, the GKSES was divided into two components, SE-skill and SE- knowledge. SE-skill comprised five items related to the skills in detecting and managing suicide risk. SE-knowledge included four items associated with knowledge about depression, suicide and resources available for at-risk individuals. After adjusting for covariates and SE components, SE-skill was associated with helping confidence and the intentions to adopt all five helping actions (including three recommended actions and two unrecommended actions), while SE-knowledge was associated with helping confidence and intention to take only one recommended helping action (i.e., to help make an appointment with a professional).
Conclusions: Suicide prevention gatekeeper training and educational activities should focus on encouraging people to ask direct questions about suicide risk and providing them with clear messages about “what not to do” (e.g., persuading the person that suicide is wrong or that suicide would hurt their friends and family).
en
dc.description.provenanceSubmitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-02-26T16:16:37Z
No. of bitstreams: 0
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2024-02-26T16:16:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書 i
致謝 ii
Acknowledgement iii
摘要 iv
Abstract v
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Global status and Taiwan context of suicide 1
1.2 Gatekeeper as a suicide prevention strategy 1
1.3 Gatekeeper training model 3
1.4 Gatekeeper self-efficacy 4
1.5 Helping confidence and intentions towards suicidal individuals 5
1.6 Knowledge gaps 6
1.7 Study aims 7
Chapter 2 Method 8
2.1 Data 8
2.2 Measures 9
2.2.1 Helping confidence 9
2.2.2 Specific helping intentions 10
2.2.3 Gatekeeper Self-Efficacy Scale (GKSES) 10
2.3 Statistical Analysis 11
Chapter 3 Results 14
3.1 Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) 14
3.2 Internal consistency 15
3.3 Demographic characteristics 15
3.4 Logistic regression analyses 16
Chapter 4 Discussion 18
4.1 Main findings 18
4.2 Comparison with previous findings 18
4.3 Strengths and limitations 23
Chapter 5 Implications 25
Chapter 6 Conclusion 26
References 27
Tables and Figure 33
Table 1. Measurement of the general helping confidence and intention to take five specific helping actions. 33
Table 2. Distribution of the responses for the nine-item Gatekeeper Self-efficacy Scale (GKSES) in 5-point rating scales. 35
Table 3. Nine-item Gatekeeper Self-efficacy Scale (GKSES) item mean scores, and factor loadings. 37
Table 4. Suicide gatekeeper self-efficacy (SE) components (SE-skill and SE-knowledge) by characteristic amongst 997 respondents. 38
Table 5. Logistic regression analysis of the association of gatekeeper self-efficacy (SE)-skill with helping confidence and intentions to take five specific actions. 40
Table 6. Logistic regression analysis of the association of gatekeeper self-efficacy (SE)-knowledge with helping confidence and intentions to take five specific actions. 41
Figure 1. Scree plot. 42
Appendix Table 1. Comparison of the distributions of age group, sex, and region between the study sample and Taiwan’s population in 2021. 43
-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.subject守門人自我效能zh_TW
dc.subject探索性因素分析zh_TW
dc.subject助人意圖zh_TW
dc.subject助人信心zh_TW
dc.subject自殺防治zh_TW
dc.subjectsuicide preventionen
dc.subjecthelping intentionen
dc.subjecthelping confidenceen
dc.subjectgatekeeper self-efficacyen
dc.subjectexploratory factor analysisen
dc.title一般民眾自殺預防守門人自我效能、助人信心與助人意圖:臺灣全國電話調查研究zh_TW
dc.titleSuicide prevention gatekeeper self-efficacy and helping confidence and intentions in the general population: a national telephone survey in Taiwanen
dc.typeThesis-
dc.date.schoolyear112-1-
dc.description.degree碩士-
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee張齡尹;陳映燁zh_TW
dc.contributor.oralexamcommitteeLing-Yin Chang;Ying-Yeh Chenen
dc.subject.keyword自殺防治,守門人自我效能,助人信心,助人意圖,探索性因素分析,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordsuicide prevention,gatekeeper self-efficacy,helping confidence,helping intention,exploratory factor analysis,en
dc.relation.page43-
dc.identifier.doi10.6342/NTU202304565-
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)-
dc.date.accepted2023-12-25-
dc.contributor.author-college公共衛生學院-
dc.contributor.author-dept健康行為與社區科學研究所-
顯示於系所單位:健康行為與社區科學研究所

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-112-1.pdf1.07 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved