請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91812完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 官晨怡 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Chen-I Kuan | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 李佳芸 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Chia-Yun Lee | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-02-22T16:50:17Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-02-23 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-02-22 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2024-02-05 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | Alvesson, M., & Karreman, D. (2000). Varieties of discourse: On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human relations, 53(9), 1125-1149.
Alvesson, M., & Kärreman, D. (2000). Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: Challenges, responses, consequences. The journal of applied behavioral science, 36(2), 136-158. Argyle, C. E., Harper, J. C., & Davies, M. C. (2016). Oocyte cryopreservation: where are we now? Hum Reprod Update, 22(4), 440-449. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmw007 Baldwin, K. (2017). ‘ I Suppose I Think to Myself, That’ s the Best Way to Be a Mother’: How Ideologies of Parenthood Shape Women’ s Use for Social Egg Freezing Technology. Sociological Research Online, 22(2), 1-2. Baldwin, K. (2018). Conceptualising women's motivations for social egg freezing and experience of reproductive delay. Sociology of Health & Illness, 40(5), 859-873. Baldwin, K. (2019a). The biomedicalisation of reproductive ageing: reproductive citizenship and the gendering of fertility risk. Health, Risk & Society, 21(5-6), 268-283. Baldwin, K. (2019b). Egg freezing, fertility and reproductive choice: Negotiating responsibility, hope and modern motherhood. Emerald Publishing Limited. Baldwin, K., Culley, L., Hudson, N., & Mitchell, H. (2019). Running out of time: exploring women’s motivations for social egg freezing. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 40(2), 166-173. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). sage. Becker, M. H., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1984). Compliance with medical advice. Health care and human behavior, 175-208. Bellstrom, K. (2015). Intel quadruples fertility benefits. https://fortune.com/2015/10/20/intel-quadruples-fertility-benefits/ Bennett, S. E. (1995). Comparing Americans'' political information in 1988 and 1992. The Journal of Politics, 57(2), 521-532. Benzies, K., Tough, S., Tofflemire, K., Frick, C., Faber, A., & Newburn‐Cook, C. (2006). Factors influencing women’s decisions about timing of motherhood. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 35(5), 625-633. Bhatia, R., & Campo-Engelstein, L. (2018). The biomedicalization of social egg freezing: A comparative analysis of European and American professional ethics opinions and US news and popular media. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 43(5), 864-887. Bozzaro, C. (2018). Is egg freezing a good response to socioeconomic and cultural factors that lead women to postpone motherhood? Reprod Biomed Online, 36(5), 594-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.01.018 Brosius, H.-B. (2007). Urs Dahinden: Framing. Eine integrative Theorie der Massenkommunikation. Publizistik, 1(52), 95-96. Brown, E., & Patrick, M. (2018). Time, anticipation, and the life course: egg freezing as temporarily disentangling romance and reproduction. American Sociological Review, 83(5), 959-982. Browne, J. (2018). Technology, fertility and public policy: a structural perspective on human egg freezing and gender equality. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 25(2), 149-168. Cattapan, A., Hammond, K., Haw, J., & Tarasoff, L. A. (2014). Breaking the ice: young feminist scholars of reproductive politics reflect on egg freezing. IJFAB: International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics, 7(2), 236-247. Code, L. (2002). Encyclopedia of feminist theories. Routledge. Douglas, D. G. (2012). The Social Construction of Technological Systems, anniversary edition: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT press. Dunson, D. B., Baird, D. D., & Colombo, B. (2004). Increased infertility with age in men and women. Obstet Gynecol, 103(1), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.Aog.0000100153.24061.45 Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of communication, 43(4), 51-58. Ethics, E. T. F. o., Law, i., Dondorp, W., de Wert, G., Pennings, G., Shenfield, F., Devroey, P., Tarlatzis, B., Barri, P., & Diedrich, K. (2012). Oocyte cryopreservation for age-related fertility loss. Human reproduction, 27(5), 1231-1237. Faddy, M. J., Gosden, R. G., Gougeon, A., Richardson, S. J., & Nelson, J. F. (1992). Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod, 7(10), 1342-1346. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137570 Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human relations, 7(2), 117-140. Foucault, M. (2019). Power: the essential works of Michel Foucault 1954-1984. Penguin UK. Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The “mainstreaming” of America: Violence profile number 11. Journal of communication, 30(3), 10-29. Giddens, A. (2007). The consequences of modernity. 1990. Goold, I., & Savulescu, J. (2009). In favour of freezing eggs for non‐medical reasons. Bioethics, 23(1), 47-58. Hays, S. (1996). The cultural contradictions of motherhood. Yale University Press. Heath, L., Gordon, M. T., & LeBailly, R. (1981). What newspapers tell us (and don''t tell us) about rape. Newspaper Research Journal, 2(4), 48-55. Ho, D. Y.-F., & Chiu, C.-Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture. Hodes-Wertz, B., Druckenmiller, S., Smith, M., & Noyes, N. (2013). What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertility and sterility, 100(5), 1343-1349. e1342. Hodes-Wertz, B., Druckenmiller, S., Smith, M., & Noyes, N. (2013). What do reproductive-age women who undergo oocyte cryopreservation think about the process as a means to preserve fertility? Fertil Steril, 100(5), 1343-1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.201 Hook, E. B. (1981). Rates of chromosome abnormalities at different maternal ages. Obstet Gynecol, 58(3), 282-285. Hwang, K.-K. (1998). Guanxi and mientze: Conflict resolution in Chinese society. Intercultural Communication Studies, 7(1), 17-38. Ikhena-Abel, D. E., Confino, R., Shah, N. J., Lawson, A. K., Klock, S. C., Robins, J. C., & Pavone, M. E. (2017). Is employer coverage of elective egg freezing coercive?: a survey of medical students’ knowledge, intentions, and attitudes towards elective egg freezing and employer coverage. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 34, 1035-1041. Inhorn, M. C., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Birger, J., Westphal, L. M., Doyle, J., Gleicher, N., Meirow, D., Dirnfeld, M., Seidman, D., & Kahane, A. (2018). Elective egg freezing and its underlying socio-demography: a binational analysis with global implications. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology, 16(1), 1-11. Inhorn, M. C., Birenbaum-Carmeli, D., Westphal, L. M., Doyle, J., Gleicher, N., Meirow, D., Dirnfeld, M., Seidman, D., Kahane, A., & Patrizio, P. (2018). Ten pathways to elective egg freezing: a binational analysis. Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 35, 2003-2011. Jie, B. (2019). 儒家如何看待脱離婚姻的生育行為——由單身女性 [凍卵] 問題引發的法律與倫理討論: How Does Confucianism View the Procreative Behavior of Marriage? A Legal and Ethical Discussion Triggered by the Problem of Single Women's Frozen Eggs. International Journal of Chinese & Comparative Philosophy of Medicine, 17(1), 29-47. Johnson, A. G. (2005). The gender knot: Unraveling our patriarchal legacy. Temple University Press. Jones, G. W. (2007). Delayed marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia. Population and development review, 33(3), 453-478. Kimle, P. A., & Damhorst, M. L. (1997). A grounded theory model of the ideal business image for women. Symbolic Interaction, 20(1), 45-68. Kramerae, C., & Spender, D. (2000). Routledge international encyclopedia of women. Lo, K.-T. (2012). The crowding-out effect of homeownership on fertility. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 33, 108-117. Lockwood, G. M. (2011). Social egg freezing: the prospect of reproductive ''immortality'' or a dangerous delusion? Reprod Biomed Online, 23(3), 334-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.05.010 Lu, Y. (2023). The criteria of Chinese and South Koreans’ mate selection: A comparative study of long-term and short-term mate selection preferences in the cross-cultural perspective. Heliyon, 9(2), e13329. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13329 Luskin, R. C. (1990). Explaining political sophistication. Political behavior, 12, 331-361. Manne, K. (2017). Down girl: The logic of misogyny. Oxford University Press. Marcinkowski, F. (2002). Agenda Setting als politikwissenschaftlich relevantes Paradigma. Freiheit und Gemeinwohl–Politikfelder und Politikvermittlung zu Beginn des, 21. Martin, L. J. (2010). Anticipating infertility: Egg freezing, genetic preservation, and risk. Gender & Society, 24(4), 526-545. Matthes, J. (2014). Framing. Konzepte: Ansätze der Medien-und Kommunikationswissenschaft. Die empirische Erfassung von Medien-Frames. Medien-und Kommunikationswissenschaft, 56-75. Mertes, H., & Pennings, G. (2012). Elective oocyte cryopreservation: who should pay? Hum Reprod, 27(1), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/der364 Mishra, V., & Smyth, R. (2010). Female labor force participation and total fertility rates in the OECD: New evidence from panel cointegration and Granger causality testing. Journal of Economics and Business, 62(1), 48-64. Myers, K. (2017). “If I’m going to do it, I’m going to do it right”: intensive mothering ideologies among childless women who elect egg freezing. Gender & Society, 31(6), 777-803. Myers, K. C., & Martin, L. J. (2021). Freezing time? The sociology of egg freezing. Sociology Compass, 15(4), e12850. Nybo Andersen, A. M., Wohlfahrt, J., Christens, P., Olsen, J., & Melbye, M. (2000). Maternal age and fetal loss: population based register linkage study. Bmj, 320(7251), 1708-1712. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7251.1708 OECD Family Database. (2018). https://www.oecd.org/els/family/database.htm OOCYTE, M. (2013). Mature oocyte cryopres | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91812 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 凍卵為近年來新興社會議題。生育一事牽涉眾多考量，現代女性一方面想要保有生育的機會，一方面追求教育與職涯，晚婚晚育便應運而生。女性因年齡增長帶來生育能力喪失的潛在威脅，更是凍卵需求的重要原因。
研究者採納科技與社會(Science, technology and society, 學門的觀點，關心凍卵技術發展的社會意涵，並且著眼於凍卵的倫理爭議以及該技術對社會帶來的衝擊。本文透過論述分析檢視凍卵在媒體場域的討論，點出不同的辯論立場中各種基於性別角色期待的論點，用性別觀點深入剖析凍卵科技之使用如何牽涉各式權力關係與協商。 研究者以田野觀察的方式進行文本資料收集。資料收集始於2023 年1 月1日，結束於2023 年12 月31 日。納入的分析的文本有送子鳥生殖中心以及茂盛醫院的診所網站、Dcard 、Threads 和Facebook 的貼文和留言、YouTube 影片以及網路新聞，另外還進行了三場田野觀察。研究者將文本內容概念化，以論述分析的方式進行研究，目的是想要探究凍卵議題所處的社會脈絡，以及凍卵議題的相關論述可能如何影響使用者的選擇。 本研究發現台灣社會中凍卵被賦予「保險和賦權」的意義，其意義建構發生於不利於婚育的政治經濟環境，以及持續影響女性發展機會的性別規範。在此情境中，生殖醫學機構積極提高女性對於不孕風險的意識，並以「賦權」的說法鼓勵女性利用凍卵來管控不孕的風險，當整體社會結構未被檢視與改變，凍卵只是一種將社會問題個人化的回應方案，並不能改變台灣晚婚晚育的趨勢以及解決少子化的危機。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Egg freezing has become a emerging social issue in recent years. The decision to have children involves various considerations, and modern women, on one hand, want to preserve their reproductive opportunities, while on the other hand, pursue education and careers, leading to delayed marriage and childbirth. The potential threat of decreased fertility due to age has become an important reason for the demand for egg freezing.
Researcher adopts the perspective of Science, Technology, and Society (STS) to examine the social implications of egg freezing technology and focus on the ethical controversies and impacts on society caused by this technology. This article examines the discussions on egg freezing in the media field through discourse analysis, highlighting various arguments based on gender role expectations from different debate positions. It deeply analyzes how the use of egg freezing technology is involved in various power relations and negotiations from a gender perspective. Researcher conducted textual data collection through field observation. The data collection started on January 1, 2023, and ended on December 31, 2023. The texts included websites of fertility centers and clinics such as "Stork Fertility Center" and "Lee Women's Hospital," posts and comments on platforms like Dcard, Threads, and Facebook, YouTube videos, and online news. Additionally, three field observations were conducted. Researcher conceptualized the content of the texts and conducted the study through discourse analysis, aiming to explore the social context of the egg freezing issue and how related discourses might influence people's choices. The study reveals that in Taiwanese society, egg freezing is imbued with the meanings of "insurance and empowerment." This meaning construction arises from a political and economic environment unfavorable to marriage and childbearing, as well as gender norms that continue to impact women's development opportunities. In this context, reproductive medical institutions actively raise awareness of the infertility risk among women and encourage the use of egg freezing as an "empowering" solution to control that risk. However, without a thorough examination and transformation of the overall social structure, egg freezing remains a personalized response to societal issues, unable to change the trend of delayed marriages and parenthood in Taiwan or address the crisis of declining birth rates. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-02-22T16:50:17Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-02-22T16:50:17Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 謝辭 ii
摘要 iii 第一章 研究背景與動機 1 第二章 研究目的 4 第三章 文獻回顧 5 第一節 凍卵之技術發展與歷史 5 第二節 凍卵論述與媒體效應 6 (一)、現代資訊搜尋行為 6 (二)、媒體的議題設定 7 (三)、知溝假說 8 (四)、以健康信念模式解釋凍卵論述如何影響個人的凍卵意圖 8 (五)、媒體與社會比較理論 9 第三節 性別政治 10 (一)、厭女 10 (二)、父權的家庭：中華文化中的群體以及女性角色 11 (三)、醫療專業中的父權 12 第四節 凍卵：社會變遷中的科技使用與性別 12 第四章 研究方法 14 第一節 資料收集 14 (一)、田野觀察 14 (二)、文本收集 14 (三)、Dcard貼文搜尋策略 17 第二節 論述分析 17 第五章 研究結果 19 第一節 凍卵議題的眾生圖像 19 第二節 投資、保險、後悔藥 21 (一)、凸顯風險的宣傳實作 23 (二)、讓女性相信自己有能力管控風險(賦權的說法) 27 第三節 凍卵論述中的社會規範與性別角色期待 42 (一)、年齡、痛苦和勇敢 44 (二)、凍卵正當性的道德劃界 45 (三)、凍卵的多種表述 49 第四節 婚姻擠壓：凍卵的重要脈絡 50 (一)、婚育一體、先婚後育的正當性 51 (二)、晚婚的原因 51 (三)、晚婚、不婚的社會因素 53 (四)、單身與凍卵 54 第五節 育兒的期待與恐懼 55 第六章 討論 57 第七章 結論 58 第一節 主要發現 58 (一)、凍卵議題設定 58 (三)、個體詮釋與回應 59 第二節 研究限制 59 第三節 未來研究建議 59 第八章 參考資料 60 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 從性別觀點看臺灣的凍卵論述 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Analyzing Taiwan's Egg Freezing Discourse from a Gender Perspective | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 張竹芩;黃柏堯 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Jhu-Cin Jhang;Po-Yao Huang | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 凍卵,媒體論述,論述分析,性別,科技與社會, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | social egg freezing,media discourse,discourse analysis,gender,science and technology in society, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 66 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202400586 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2024-02-06 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 公共衛生學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 健康行為與社區科學研究所 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 健康行為與社區科學研究所 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-112-1.pdf 授權僅限NTU校內IP使用（校園外請利用VPN校外連線服務） | 2.34 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。