請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件：
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91360完整後設資料紀錄
| DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.advisor | 張郁蔚 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.advisor | Yu-Wei Chang | en |
| dc.contributor.author | 林湘柔 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.author | Hsiang-Jou Lin | en |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-12T16:11:27Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2024-01-13 | - |
| dc.date.copyright | 2024-01-12 | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
| dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-10 | - |
| dc.identifier.citation | 吳紹群、吳明德（2007）。開放資訊取用期刊對學術傳播系統之影響。圖書資訊學研究，2(1)，21-54。
吳紹群、陳雪華（2011）。人文學專書出版問題對學術傳播之影響。大學圖書館，15(2)，39-61。https://doi.org/10.6146/univj.2011.15-2.03 吳瑩月（2007）。電子預印本開放取用對學術傳播之影響：以物理學門為例 [未出版之碩士論文]。國立政治大學圖書資訊與檔案學研究所。 林雯瑤（2003）。電子預行本與學術傳播。圖書資訊學刊，1(2)，59-80。 黃慕萱、嚴竹蓮（2016）。同儕審查的起源、研究現況與展望。圖書資訊學刊，14(1)，41-85。https://doi.org/10.6182/jlis.2016.14(1).041 蔡明月（2003）。資訊計量學與文獻特性。華泰文化。 American Chemical Society. (2016, August 10). American Chemical Society announces intention to establish “ChemRxiv” preprint server to promote early research sharing. https://www.acs.org/content/acs/en/pressroom/newsreleases/2016/august/acs-announces-intention-to-establish-chemrxiv-preprint-server-to-promote-early-research-sharing.html Añazco, D., Nicolalde, B., Espinosa, I., Camacho, J., Mushtaq, M., Gimenez, J., & Teran, E. (2021). Publication rate and citation counts for preprints released during the COVID-19 pandemic: The good, the bad and the ugly. PeerJ, 9. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.10927 Anderson, K. (2021, August 16). Preprints and journalists take over. The Geyser. https://thegeyser.substack.com/p/journals-are-losing-the-position Andrés, A. (2010). Measuring academic research: How to undertake a bibliometric study. Chandos Publishing. Arab World English Journal for Translation & Literary Studies. (2022). What is the scope/research area of the journal? https://awej.org/faq/ ArXiv. (2019). Our moderation process. https://blog.arxiv.org/2019/08/29/our-moderation-process/ ArXiv. (2022, February 10). About arXiv. https://arxiv.org/about/ Barry, S. (2018). Chemists, it is time to embrace preprints. Chemistry of Materials, 30(9), 2859. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01360 Baumann, A., & Wohlrabe, K. (2020). Where have all the working papers gone? Evidence from four major economics working paper series. Scientometrics, 124, 2433-2441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03570-x Besançon, L., Peiffer-Smadja, N., Segalas, C., Jiang, H., Masuzzo, P., Smout, C., Billy, E., Deforet, M., & Leyrat, C. (2021). Open science saves lives: Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Res Methodolh, 21(117). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-021-01304-y Bhalla, N. (2016). Has the time come for preprints in biology? Molecular Biology of the Cell, 27(8), 1185-1187. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E16-02-0123 Bourne, P. E., Polka, J. K., Vale, R. D., & Kiley, R. (2017). Ten simple rules to consider regarding preprint submission. PLOS Computational Biology, 13(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005473 Brown, A. J. G., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2017). Three decades of publishing research in population economics. Journal of Population Economics, 30(1), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00148-016-0620-1 Brown, C. (2001). The E-volution of preprints in the scholarly communication of physicists and astronomers. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 52(3), 187-200. https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4571(2000)9999:9999<::AID-ASI1586>3.0.CO;2-D Brown, C. (2003). The Role of electronic preprints in chemical communication: Analysis of citation, usage, and acceptance in the journal literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(5), 362-371. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10223 Carà, P. D., Ciriminna, R., & Pagliaro, M. (2017). Has the time come for preprints in chemistry? ACS Omega, 2(11), 7923-7928. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.7b01190 Center for Open Science. (n.d.). Manage and share your research with OSF – An easy, integrated platform. https://www.cos.io/products/osf ChemWeb. (n.d.). https://chemweb.com/ Chiarelli, A., Johnson, R., Richens, E., & Pinfield, S. (2019). Accelerating scholarly communication: The transformative role of preprints. Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3357727 Cobb, M. (2017). The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s. PLOS Biology, 15(11). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003995 Correia, A.M.R., & de Castro Neto, M. (2002). The role of eprint archives in the access to, and dissemination of, scientific grey literature: LIZA–a case study by the National Library of Portugal. Journal of Information Science, 28(3), 231-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150202800305 Coudert, F. (2020). The rise of preprints in chemistry. Nature Chemistry, 12, 499-502. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-020-0477-5 Cressey, D. (2016). Chemists to get their own preprint server. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2016.20409 Cruickshank, J. (2002). The role of scientific literature in electronic scholarly communication. Science & Technology Libraries, 22(3-4), 71-100. https://doi.org/10.1300/J122v22n03_08 Cruz, J. M. B., & Krichel, T. (2000). Cataloging economics preprints: An introduction to the RePEc project. Journal of Internet Cataloging, 3(2-3), 227-241. https://doi.org/10.1300/J141v03n02_08 Curry, S. (2015, September 7). Peer review, preprints and the speed of science. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/science/occams-corner/2015/sep/07/peer-review-preprints-speed-science-journals Engels, T.C.E., Ossenblok, T.L.B., & Spruyt, E.H.J. (2012). Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000-2009. Scientometrics, 93(2), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0680-2 Fox, F. (2018, July 17). The preprint dilemma: good for science, bad for the public? A discussion paper for the scientific community. Science Media Centre. http://www.sciencemediacentre.org/the-preprint-dilemma-good-for-science-bad-for-the-public-a-discussion-paper-for-the-scientific-community/?cli_action=1628240196.459 Geltner, G. (2018, December 22). Long live the curator! Preprints and a future for humanities publishing. http://www.guygeltner.net/blog/22122018long-live-the-curator-preprints-and-a-future-for-humanities-publishing Geltner, G., & Smail, D. (2022, April 5). The Evolving Uses of Preprints in Humanities Scholarship. http://www.guygeltner.net/blog/humanitiespreprints Geltner, G., & WIllinsky, J. (2018, May 6). Preprint to monograph: A path to travel by. http://www.guygeltner.net/blog/652018preprint-to-monograph-a-path-to-travel-by Ginsparg, P. (1999). Some comments on e-biosci. http://www.cs.cornell.edu/~ginsparg/physics/blurb/beagle99.html Ginsparg, P. (2011). ArXiv at 20. Nature, 476, 145-147. https://doi.org/10.1038/476145a Ginsparg, P. (2016). Preprint déjà vu. The EMBO Journal, 35(24), 2620-2625. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201695531 Ginsparg, P. (2021). Lessons from arXiv’ s 30 years of information sharing. Nature Reviews Physics, 3(9), 602-603. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-021-00360-z Hammarfelt, B., de Rijcke, S. (2015). Accountability in context: effects of research evaluation systems on publication practices, disciplinary norms, and individual working routines in the faculty of Arts at Uppsala University, Research Evaluation, 24(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.1093/reseval/rvu029 Herbert, R., Gasson, K., & Ponsford, A. (2019). The need for speed: How quickly do preprints become published articles? ICSR Perspectives. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1148&context=scholcom Hoy, M. B. (2020). Rise of the Rxivs: How preprint servers are changing the publishing process. Medical Reference Services Quarterly, 39(1), 84-89. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763869.2020.1704597 Jia, J. L., Hua, V. J., Mills, D. E., & Sarin, K. Y. (2021). Journal attitudes and outcomes of preprints in dermatology. British Journal of Dermatology, 185(1), 230-232. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.20065 Johansson, M. A., Reich, N. G., Meyers, L. A., & Lipsitch, M. (2018). Preprints: An underutilized mechanism to accelerate outbreak science. PLOS Medicine, 15(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002549 Knöchelmann, M. (2019). Open science in the humanities, or: Open humanities? Publications, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications7040065 Krichel, T. (1997). About NetEc, with special Reference to WoPEc. http://openlib.org/home/krichel/hisn.html Laporte, S. (2017). Preprint for the humanities–Fiction or a real possibility? Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 16, 367-378. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.17.014.7715 Leung, A. (2019, August 30). Advance and preprints: A year one retrospective. SAGE perspectives. https://perspectivesblog.sagepub.com/blog/preprints-sage-advance-anniversary?rq=preprint Leung, A. (2020, September 25). Social science preprints in the age of COVID-19. SAGE perspectives. https://perspectivesblog.sagepub.com/blog/peer-review-week/social-science-preprints-in-the-age-of-covid19 Li, X., Thelwall, M., & Kousha, K. (2015). The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(6), 614-635. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-03-2015-0049 Lin, J., Yu, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhou, Z., & Shi, X. (2020). How many preprints have actually been printed and why: A case study of computer science preprints on arXiv. Scientometrics, 124, 555-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03430-8 Majumuder, M. S., & Mandl, K. D. (2020). Early in the epidemic: Impact of preprints on global discourse about COVID-19 transmissibility. The Lancet Global Health, 8(5), e627-e630. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30113-3 Maslove, D. M. (2018). Medical preprints–A debate worth having. JAMA, 319(5), 443-444. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.17566 Milne, P. (1999). Scholarly communication: Crisis, response and future. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 30(2), 70-88. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048623.1999.10755081 Osburn, C. B. (1989). The structuring of the scholarly communication system. College & Research Libraries, 50(3), 277-286. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_50_03_277 Pagliaro, M. (2021). Preprints in chemistry: An exploratory analysis of differences with journal articles. Publications, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9010005 Palayew, A., Norgaard, O., Safreed-Harmon, K., Andersen, T. H., Rasmussen, L. N., & Lazarus, J. V. (2020). Pandemic publishing poses a new COVID-19 challenge. Nature Human Behaviour, 4, 666-669. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-0911-0 Perera, S. D., Muleta, A. D., Vlasschaert, C., & Hegele, R. A. (2021). Preprint servers in lipidology: Current status and future role. Current Opinion Lipidology, 32, http://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000797 Pierce, S. J. (1999). Boundary crossing in research literatures as a means of interdisciplinary information transfer. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(3), 271-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(1999)50:3<271::AID-ASI10>3.0.CO;2-M Pritchard, A. (1969). Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics. Journal of Documentation, 25(4), 348-349. PubMed Central. (2021). NIH Preprint Pilot. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/nihpreprints/ Pulverer, B. (2016). Preparing for preprints. The EMBO Journal, 35(24), 2617-2619. https://doi.org/10.15252/embj.201670030 RePEc. (n.d.). RePEc history. https://ideas.repec.org/history.html Rieger, O. Y. (2020, May 27). Preprints in the spotlight: Establishing best practices, building trust. Ithaka S+R. https://doi.org/10.18665/sr.313288 Sarabipour, S., Debat, H. J., Emmott, E., Burgess, S. J., Schwessinger, B., & Hensel, Z. (2019). On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective. PLOS Biology, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151 Shehata, A. M. K., Ellis, D., & Foster, A. (2015). Scholarly communication trends in the digital age: Informal scholarly publishing and dissemination, a grounded theory approach. Electronic Library, 33(6), 1150-1162. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-09-2014-0160 Sheldon, T. (2018). Preprints could promote confusion and distortion. Nature, 559, 445. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-05789-4 Smith, A. P. (2000). The journal as an overlay on preprint databases. Learned Publishing, 13(1), 43-48. https://doi.org/10.1087/09531510050145542 Smyth, A. R., Rawlinson, C., & Jenkins, G. (2020). Preprint servers: A ‘rush to publish’ or ‘just in time delivery’ for science? Thorax, 75(7), 532-533. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-214937 SSRN. (n.d.). Philosophy Research Network. https://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en/prn/ Teixeira, A. A. C. (2013). What makes a working paper in economics publishable? A tale from the scientific periphery. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 44(2), 142-164. http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/jsp.44.2.003 Till, J. E. (2001). Predecessors of preprint servers. Learned Publishing, 14(1), 7-13. https://doi. org/10.1087/09531510125100214 Tsunoda, H., Sun, Y., Nishizawa, M., Liu, X., & Amano, K. (2019). An analysis of published journals for papers posted on bioRXiv. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 56(1), 783-784. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.175 United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2015). International Standard Classification of Education. https://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/international-standard-classification-of-education-fields-of-education-and-training-2013-detailed-field-descriptions-2015-en.pdf Van de Sompel, H., Payette, S., Ericson, J., Lagoze, C., & Warner, S. (2004). Rethinking scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 10(9). http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/09vandesompel.html Vuong, Q. H. (2020). The rise of preprints and their value in social sciences and humanities. Science Editing, 7(1), 70-72. https://doi.org/10.6087/kcse.193 Wang, Z., Glänzel, W., & Chen, Y. (2020). The impact of preprints in library and information science: An analysis of citations, usage and social attention indicators. Scientometrics, 125, 1403-1423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03612-4 Wang, Z., Glänzel, W., & Chen, Y. (2018, September 12-14). How self-archiving influences the citation impact of a paper: A bibliometric analysis of arXiv papers and non-arXiv papers in the field of information science and library science [paper presentation]. STI 2018 Conference, Leiden, The Netherlands. https://scholarlypublications.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2729127/view Wohlrabe, K., & Bürgi, C. (2021). Do working papers increase journal citations? Evidence from the top 5 journals in economics. Applied Economics Letters, 28(17), 1531-1535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2020.1855303 Wykle, S. (2014, October 31-November 5). Enclaves of anarchy: Preprint sharing, 1940-1990 [paper presentation]. 77th ASIS&T Annual Meeting, WA, United States. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.2014.14505101036 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91360 | - |
| dc.description.abstract | 今日的預行本以電子形式為主，研究成果撰寫完成後，作者可將之上傳至預行本伺服器或其他平台，世界各地的研究者可透過網路，即時閱讀、下載、引用該學科最新研究成果。而各學科預行本文化發展有別，物理學、經濟學預行本文化發展成熟，化學、生命科學仍在發展，而人文科學預行本文化發展相較其他學科緩慢，相關研究亦缺乏。
為了解人文科學研究者預行本使用情形，本研究採用書目計量法，以有收錄人文科學預行本的SSRN為資料來源，選擇英美文學為目標學科，探究1997年至2020年，SSRN中收錄的1,734篇英美文學預行本發表情形、1,376位不同作者特性，以及預行本正式出版情形。研究結果顯示SSRN收錄之英美文學預行本數量隨時間逐年成長、作者所屬國家以美國為大宗。因SSRN定義之英美文學包含法律與文學等跨學科研究成果，故英美文學預行本作者所屬職業及學科多元，除教授、碩博士生之外，亦有作家、譯者、律師、公司職員等發表預行本；作者所屬學科除語言文學，尚有來自社會科學及自然科學不同學科的作者。期刊文章是英美文學預行本後續主要出版類型，並有超過半數的預行本是在研究成果正式出版後，作者才將預行本於SSRN中公開。純英美文學預行本以「先正式出版才於SSRN中公開」者為多，跨學科預行本則以「先於SSRN中公開才正式出版」者為多；語言文學作者發表的預行本也以「先正式出版才於SSRN上公開」者為多，反之，非語言文學作者的預行本以「先於SSRN上公開才正式出版」者為多。統整英美文學預行本「在SSRN上公開」、「最後修改」及「正式出版」日期先後順序，得英美文學預行本共計三種發表模式：（一）先在SSRN上公開、完成最後修改才正式出版；（二）先在SSRN上公開、正式出版才完成最後修改；（三）先完成最後修改、正式出版才在SSRN上公開。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | The culture of preprints varies across different disciplines. While physics and economics have developed mature preprint cultures, chemistry and life sciences are still evolving, and the development of preprint culture in humanities lags behind, with a relative dearth of related research.
To understand the utilization of preprints among authors in the humanities, this study uses bibliometric methods, takes SSRN as data sources, and selects English and American literature as the target subject. The study analyzes the publication patterns of 1,734 preprints in English and American literature from 1997 to 2020, encompassing the characteristics of 1,376 distinct authors, and the subsequent publication of preprints. The results reveal a steady annual growth in the number of preprints in English and American literature on SSRN, with a majority of authors hailing from the United States. Given that SSRN's definition of English and American literature includes interdisciplinary research such as law and literature, preprint authors exhibit diverse affiliations and disciplines. Journal articles are the main publication type for preprints in English and American literature. Furthermore, over half of the preprints are uploaded on SSRN only after they published on books, proceedings or journals. There are three different publication modes of preprints in English and American literature: (1) preprints are uploaded on SSRN, and then undergo last revision before publication; (2) preprints are uploaded on SSRN, and then undergo publication before last revision; (3) preprints undergo last revision, and then published before uploaded on SSRN. | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2024-01-12T16:11:27Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2024-01-12T16:11:27Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
| dc.description.tableofcontents | 摘要ii
ABSTRACT iii 表次vi 圖次viii 第一章 緒論1 第一節 研究背景與動機1 第二節 研究目的與問題6 第三節 研究範圍與限制7 第四節 名詞解釋8 第二章 文獻探討11 第一節 預印本定義與發展11 第二節 預印本功能、問題與挑戰21 第三節 自然科學預印本之發表、引用與出版28 第四節 社會科學及人文科學預印本之發表、引用與出版33 第三章 研究設計與實施39 第一節 研究方法39 第二節 研究對象與資料來源40 第三節 資料蒐集43 第四節 資料處理與分析44 第五節 研究流程52 第四章 研究結果與討論55 第一節 英美文學預行本發表情形55 第二節 英美文學預行本作者特性59 第三節 英美文學預行本正式出版情形70 第四節 綜合討論95 第五章 結論與建議100 第一節 結論100 第二節 研究貢獻105 第三節 建議106 參考文獻109 | - |
| dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
| dc.title | 英美文學預行本作者及其預行本出版之探討 | zh_TW |
| dc.title | Preprint Authors in the Field of English and American Literature and Their Preprints Published | en |
| dc.type | Thesis | - |
| dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
| dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 羅思嘉;林雯瑤 | zh_TW |
| dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Szu-Chia Lo;Wen-Yau Cathy Lin | en |
| dc.subject.keyword | 英美文學,預行本,SSRN, | zh_TW |
| dc.subject.keyword | English and American literature,preprint,SSRN, | en |
| dc.relation.page | 118 | - |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304046 | - |
| dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
| dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-12 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-college | 文學院 | - |
| dc.contributor.author-dept | 圖書資訊學系 | - |
| dc.date.embargo-lift | 2028-08-10 | - |
| 顯示於系所單位： | 圖書資訊學系 | |
文件中的檔案：
| 檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 2.08 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件，除了特別指名其著作權條款之外，均受到著作權保護，並且保留所有的權利。