請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91334
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 黃麗玲 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Li-Ling Huang | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳亭羽 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Ting-Yu Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-12-20T16:32:26Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-12-21 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-12-20 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-11-23 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Castells, M. (2001). 網絡社會之崛起(夏鑄九、王志弘等審譯)。唐山。(原著出版於1996年)
Castells, M. (2007). Communication, Power and Counter-Power in the Network Society. Journal of Communications - JCM. 1. Castells, M. (2009). Communication Power. Oxford University Press. Castells, M. (2020). 憤怒與希望:網際網絡時代的社會運動(廖珮杏,、劉維人譯)。南方家園。(原著出版於2012年) Chang, I.-C. C., Jou, S.-C., & Chung, M.-K. (2021). Provincialising smart urbanism in Taipei: The smart city as a strategy for urban regime transition. Urban Studies, 58(3), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020947908 Chen, ling-jyh , Ho, Y., Lee, hu-cheng, Wu, hsuan-cho , Liu, hao-min , Hsieh, hsin-hung , Huang, yu-te , & Lung, shih-chun candice . (2017). An Open Framework for Participatory PM2.5 Monitoring in Smart Cities. IEEE Access, 5, 14441 – 14454. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2723919 Hallmanns, M. (2023). Perspectives from Taiwan on digital, participatory tools for sustainable cities. 2023/06/07. Retrieved from : https://www.freiheit.org/taiwan/perspectives-taiwan-digital-participatory-tools-sustainable-cities?fbclid=IwAR2ANkas1k9Y8N1r8OX-kArMMqslLjN9CgLQll7BVhlRTdSQ8bHAJSgRzW0 Hansson, K., Belkacem, K., & Ekenberg, L. (2015). Open Government and Democracy:A Research Review. Social Science Computer Review, 33(5), 540-555. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560847 janus(2015)。與其等待不如自己來!哈爸與他的「LASS環境感測器網路系統」伙伴們要自己保護台灣環境。《T客邦》。2015/12/12,取自:https://www.techbang.com/posts/40268-dad-and-his-lass-environmental-sensor-network-system-open-source-partners-determined-to-not-let-taiwan-sky-in-beijing-as-bad Kassen, Maxat. (2013). A promising phenomenon of open data: A case study of the Chicago open data project. Government Information Quarterly. 30. 10.1016/j.giq.2013.05.012. Kooiman, J. (2002). Governance. A Social-Political Perspective. In: Grote, J.R., Gbikpi, B. (eds) Participatory Governance. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-11003-3_4 Mahajan, S., Luo, C., Wu , D., & Chen, L. (2021). From Do-It-Yourself (DIY) to Do-It-Together (DIT): Reflections on Designing a Citizen-Driven Air Quality Monitoring Framework in Taiwan. Sustainable Cities and Society, 66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102628 Milakovich, Michael. (2021). Digital Governance: Applying Advanced Technologies to Improve Public Service. 10.4324/9781003215875. Moore, M. (1995). Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Ojo, A., Janowski, T., & Estevez, E. (2011). Building theoretical foundations for electronic government benchmarking. Electronic Government, 6846, 13–25. Papacharissi, Zizi A. (2010). A Private Sphere: Democracy in a Digital Age. Cambridge: Polity. Ruijer, Erna & Grimmelikhuijsen, Stephan & Meijer, Albert. (2017). Open data for democracy: Developing a theoretical framework for open data use. Government Information Quarterly. 34. 10.1016/j.giq.2017.01.001. Schradie, Jen. (2011). The Digital Production Gap: The Digital Divide and Web 2.0 Collide. Poetics, 39, 145-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2011.02.003. Sieber, R.E. (2003). Public participation geographic information systems across borders. Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe canadien, 47: 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-0064.02e12 Tai, K. (2021). Open Government Research over a Decade: A Systematic Review. Government Information Quarterly, 38(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101566. Tan, J. & Eguavoen, I. (2017). Digital environmental governance in China: Information disclosure, pollution control, and environmental activism in the Yellow River Delta. Water Alternatives. 10. 910-929. Ubaldi, B. (2013). Open government data: Towards empirical analysis of open government data initiatives. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 22. Yang, T.-M., Lo, J., & Shiang, J. (2015). To open or not to open? Determinants of open government data. Journal of Information Science, 41(5), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551515586715 中華民國總統府(2018)。出席總統盃黑客松 總統:集結政府與民間智慧 秉持黑客精神攜手前進。2018/06/02,取自:https://www.president.gov.tw/News/23397 王御風(2011)。地方學的發展與挑戰。思與言:人文與社會科學期刊,49(4),31-55。https://doi.org/10.6431/TWJHSS.201112.0036 丘美珍、鄭仲嵐(2020)。唐鳳:我所看待的自由與未來。親子天下。 古國廷(2020)。自己的環境自己救!以空氣盒子監測你家附近的空汙。2020/06/30,取自:https://research.sinica.edu.tw/pm25-air-box-new/ 吳宗霖(2010)。從官僚行政到公共治理:一個社會學的考察〔碩士論文,國立政治大學〕。 呂國禎(2021)。十多個單位管一條河、人人自掃門前水?黑客攜手官員搶救水質。《天下雜誌》。2021/06/14,取自:https://www.cw.com.tw/article/5115243 李柏昱(2013)。防災2.0專題(五):資訊志工 官民合作力。2013/07/04,取自:https://pansci.asia/archives/44612 李洛維、朱斌妤(2021)。推動服務型智慧政府的核心引擎:資料治理的挑戰與對策。文官制度,13(2),115-151。 李恩彤(2020)。公私協力合作夥伴關係之研究- 以經濟部水利署第九河川局為例〔碩士論文,國立東華大學〕。 李維斌(2018)。李維斌專欄|智商157的柯P智囊,資訊局如何讓臺北市變身智慧城市?。2018/08/27,取自:https://futurecity.cw.com.tw/article/281 杜文苓、李翰林(2011)。環境資訊公開的民主實踐課題-以霄裡溪光電廢水汙染爭議爲例。臺灣民主季刊,8(2),59-98。https://doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.201106.0059 林冠廷(2021)。公私協力不是夢!從空氣盒子到水盒子,開創臺灣開源環境社群與政府協作最佳示範。2021/3/3,取自:https://lab.ocf.tw/2021/03/03/airboxwaterbox/ 林揚傑(2008)。全球治理思潮對傳統韋伯官僚行政理論的挑戰:從人力資源制度轉型談起。立德學報,5(2),38-61。https://doi.org/10.7080/JLU.200806.0038 張聿婷(2014)。非營利組織資訊化能力之探討-莫拉克風災中台灣數位文化協會之個案分析〔碩士論文,國立臺南大學〕。 張富林(2021)。臺灣開放政府國家行動方案之推動與展望。T&D 飛訊,(280),1-20。 陳璟民、施曉光、曾韋禎、張舒婷(2012)。經濟動能廣告 網友檢舉為詐騙、垃圾。2012/10/18,取自:https://news.ltn.com.tw/news/focus/paper/623634 曾冠球(2011)。協力治理觀點下公共管理者的挑戰與能力建立。文官制度,3(1),27-52。 曾冠球(2011)。為什麼淪為不情願夥伴?─公私夥伴關係失靈個案的制度解釋。臺灣民主季刊,8(4),83-133。https://doi.org/10.6448/TDQ.201112.0089 曾憲立、廖洲棚、李天申(2022)。政府資料公私協作模式與應用案例:協作機制的研析。公共行政學報,62,43-77。Doi: 10.30409/JPA.202203_(62).0002 游進裕、李鴻源、黃恔娉、許文堯(2014)。從淡水河流域整體治理談國土空間跨域治理之實踐。公共治理季刊,2(4),79-90。 黃怡瑄(2019)。邁向智慧城市的都市治理_以臺北與桃園為例〔碩士論文,國立臺北大學〕。 黃雅信(2016)。Maker自造者運動在台灣。2016/8/21,取自:https://yahsinhuangtw.medium.com/maker%E8%87%AA%E9%80%A0%E8%80%85%E9%81%8B%E5%8B%95%E5%9C%A8%E5%8F%B0%E7%81%A3-4d886f9872b8 楊弘任(2011)。何謂在地性?:從地方知識與在地範疇出發。思與言:人文與社會科學期刊,49(4),5-29。https://doi.org/10.6431/TWJHSS.201112.0010 楊永年(2009)。八八水災救災體系之研究。公共行政學報,(32),143-169。https://doi.org/10.30409/JPA.200909_(32).0005 董其樂(2021)。資料驅動的智慧城市治理模式分析:以臺北大數據中心為例〔碩士論文,國立臺灣大學〕。 詹文男(2020)。疫後城市治理的轉變與發展。2020/09/16,取自: http://smartcity.org.tw/auto_detail.php?id=131 數位治理中心(2021)。數位治理手冊2021版,取自:https://www.teg.org.tw/event/history.php?id=2218&gid=2219 鄭婷宇(2017)。鍵盤參與:從「零時政府」檢視黑客社群開源協作式的公民參與〔碩士論文,國立政治大學〕。 鍾明光、蔡博文、盧道杰(2012)。利用行動者網絡理論檢視公眾參與地理資訊系統對社區發展轉向之影響 以美濃黃蝶翠谷為案例。地理學報,(64),21-44。https://doi.org/10.6161/jgs.2012.64.02 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91334 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 資訊時代來臨,許多產業、領域都迎上數位化浪潮,開始關注開放資料、數據視覺化等議題。而在台灣,公共治理領域也開始謀求數位科技參與,希望藉由新興科技解決一些過往沉痾,並藉由資料與公民交流。然而在過程中卻不如想像中順遂,在公共治理的數位轉型中,公部門沒有足夠的能力完善數位化所需要的技術和經費,而公民端也因為技術問題無法妥善對接。於是在此背景下,數位公民社群進入公共治理領域,開始協助雙方之資訊化。自此,數位公民社群成為台灣公共治理中維繫資訊化前進與公私互動的特殊媒介。
本研究從實際的田野案例出發,配合深度訪談、文獻梳理與參與式觀察,試圖描述公共治理領域數位轉型時遇到的困境與各利益關係人所採取的行動。本研究利用開放資料民主行動模型(DAMODU),分析水利署與數位公民社群「LASS」(LASS -開源公益環境感測網路)在水利署內部與頭前溪的行動,描繪數位轉型網絡的建構。 本研究從田野中發現,在台灣,數位公民社群是流域治理數位轉型的重要推手。它既是與公部門協力的重要一員,亦是推動公部門與地域社群協力的重要角色,然而該角色鮮少被納入原始開放資料民主行動模型的討論中。數位公民社群透過其數位專長與居中協調能力,在公部門與地域社群間扮演文化轉譯與技術支援的角色,這使各方利益關係人在流域數位轉型中能有效溝通,從而促進公私互動。而在互動過程中,公部門不僅配合數位公民社群推動各流域之資料開放,更調整其行政架構,將公私協力會議、開源等概念納入流域數位轉型之持續推動目標,並接受公民、數位社群的共同監督。換言之,數位公民社群為台灣數位轉型中的接著劑與催化劑,若無此角色,台灣的流域治理數位轉型不會呈現當前景象。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | As the information age dawns, many industries and sectors have embraced the wave of digitization, focusing on issues such as open data and data visualization. In Taiwan, the field of public governance has also sought to involve digital technology, hoping to address long-standing problems through emerging technologies and engage in data-driven communication with the public. However, the process has not been as smooth as anticipated. In the digital transformation of public governance, the public sector lacks the necessary technical capabilities and funding to fully implement the required digitalization, while the citizen side also faces challenges in effectively connecting due to technical issues. Against this backdrop, digital citizen communities have entered the field of public governance, beginning to assist both sides in digitalization efforts. Since then, digital citizen communities have become a special intermediary in Taiwan's public governance, maintaining the progress of digitization and facilitating interactions between the public and private sectors.
This study starts from practical field cases and utilizes in-depth interviews, literature review, and participatory observation to attempt to describe the challenges encountered in the digital transformation of public governance and the actions taken by various stakeholders. The study uses the DAMODU to analyze the actions of the Water Resources Agency and the digital citizen community "LASS" within the Water Resources Agency and the Toucian River, outlining the construction of the digital transformation network. From field research, this study finds that digital citizen communities in Taiwan play a crucial role as catalysts in the digital transformation of watershed governance. They play a significant role as both crucial members in public-private collaboration with the public sector and key players in promoting collaboration between the public sector and local communities. However, this role is rarely discussed within the context of the original DAMODU. Digital citizen communities, through their digital expertise and mediating capabilities, act as cultural translators and provide technical support, facilitating effective communication among stakeholders in the digital transformation of watersheds and promoting public-private interactions. In the process, the public sector not only cooperates with digital citizen communities to promote open data in various watersheds but also adjusts its administrative structure, incorporating concepts such as collaborative meetings and open-source initiatives into the ongoing goals of watershed digital transformation while accepting the shared oversight of the public and digital communities. In other words, digital citizen communities serve as facilitators and catalysts in Taiwan's digital transformation. Without their involvement, the current landscape of digital transformation in watershed governance in Taiwan would not have emerged. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-12-20T16:32:26Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-12-20T16:32:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究動機:數位化的開始 1 第二節 研究現象 3 第三節 研究發問 6 第四節 文獻回顧 6 第五節 研究方法 15 第二章 臺灣之數位治理變革與數位公民社群發展 21 第一節 數位治理萌芽:電腦化與網路化 21 第二節 數位治理初試:資料與資訊的碰撞、數位公民社群誕生 22 第三節 數位治理成型:資料驅動之公私協力與專案模式 35 第四節 小結 43 第三章 頭前溪案例:數位公民社群進入流域治理 45 第一節 數位社群進入流域治理 46 第二節 地方經營與數位工具 60 第三節 流域治理數位轉型與各方合作 63 第四章 資料驅動之公私協力引動流域治理轉變 67 第一節 流域治理之公私互動與規則轉變 67 第二節 水利署-LASS模式之延伸:在既有制度中掀起漣漪 84 第五章 結論 89 第一節 數位公民社群的活躍與公共治理中的數位公民 89 第二節 理論回應 91 第三節 研究限制與後續建議 94 參考文獻 96 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 數位轉型與公私協力網絡 :以台灣LASS與水利署合作之流域治理為例 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Digital Transformation and Public-Private Collaboration : A Case Study of Watershed Governance between LASS and the Water Resources Agency in Taiwan. | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 杜文苓;周素卿 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wen-Ling Du;Su-Qing Zhou | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 數位治理,公私協力,資料治理,流域治理,開放資料, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | digital governance,public-private collaboration,data governance,watershed governance,open data, | en |
dc.relation.page | 101 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304439 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(全球公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-11-24 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 建築與城鄉研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 建築與城鄉研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf | 5.59 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。