請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91191
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 闕蓓德 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Pei-Te Chiueh | en |
dc.contributor.author | 陳泓勳 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Hung-Hsun Chen | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-11-28T16:11:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-29 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-11-28 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-10-24 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Admasu, S., Desta, H., Yeshitela, K., & Argaw, M. (2022). Analysis of land suitability for apple-based agroforestry farming in Dire and Legedadi watersheds of Ethiopia: implication for ecosystem services. Heliyon, 8(11).
Amissah, E., Adjei-Gyapong, T., Antwi-Agyei, P., Asamoah, E., Abaidoo, R. C., Jeppesen, E., Andersen, M. N., & Baidoo, E. (2023). Implications of changes in land use on soil and biomass carbon sequestration: a case study from the Owabi reservoir catchment in Ghana. Carbon Management, 14(1), 1-10. Anusha, B., Babu, K. R., Kumar, B. P., Sree, P. P., Veeraswamy, G., Swarnapriya, C., & Rajasekhar, M. (2023). Integrated studies for land suitability analysis towards sustainable agricultural development in semi-arid regions of AP, India. Geosystems and Geoenvironment, 2(2), 100131. Armstrong, A., Ostle, N. J., & Whitaker, J. (2016). Solar park microclimate and vegetation management effects on grassland carbon cycling. Environmental Research Letters, 11(7), 074016. Bagstad, K. J., Semmens, D. J., Waage, S., & Winthrop, R. (2013). A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services, 5, 27-39. Bennett, J. H. (1954). On the theory of random mating. Annals of Eugenics, 18(4), 311-317. Bera, B., Bhattacharjee, S., Sengupta, N., Shit, P. K., Adhikary, P. P., Sengupta, D., & Saha, S. (2022). Significant reduction of carbon stocks and changes of ecosystem service valuation of Indian Sundarban. Scientific Reports, 12(1), 7809. Bogdanov, D., Farfan, J., Sadovskaia, K., Aghahosseini, A., Child, M., Gulagi, A., Oyewo, A. S., Barbosa, L., & Breyer, C. (2019). Radical transformation pathway towards sustainable electricity via evolutionary steps. Nature Communications, 10, 16, Article 1077. Capriolo, A., Boschetto, R., Mascolo, R., Balbi, S., & Villa, F. (2020). Biophysical and economic assessment of four ecosystem services for natural capital accounting in Italy. Ecosystem Services, 46, 101207. Cavalli, M., Trevisani, S., Comiti, F., & Marchi, L. (2013). Geomorphometric assessment of spatial sediment connectivity in small Alpine catchments. Geomorphology, 188, 31-41. Chatanga, P., Kotze, D. C., Okello, T. W., & Sieben, E. J. J. (2020). Ecosystem services of high-altitude Afromontane palustrine wetlands in Lesotho. Ecosystem Services, 45, 101185. Chen, H.-P., Lee, M., & Chiueh, P.-T. (2021). Creating ecosystem services assessment models incorporating land use impacts based on soil quality. Science of the Total Environment, 773, 145018. Chiabrando, R., Fabrizio, E., & Garnero, G. (2009). The territorial and landscape impacts of photovoltaic systems: Definition of impacts and assessment of the glare risk. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(9), 2441-2451. Choi, C. S., Cagle, A. E., Macknick, J., Bloom, D. E., Caplan, J. S., & Ravi, S. (2020). Effects of revegetation on soil physical and chemical properties in solar photovoltaic infrastructure. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8, 140. Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'neill, R. V., & Paruelo, J. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253-260. Costanza, R., de Groot, R., Sutton, P., van der Ploeg, S., Anderson, S. J., Kubiszewski, I., Farber, S., & Turner, R. K. (2014). Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change, 26, 152-158. Daily, G. C. (1997). Nature's services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island press. De Marcoa, A., Petrosillo, I., Semeraro, T., Pasimeni, M. R., Aretano, R., & Zurlini, G. (2014). The contribution of Utility-Scale Solar Energy to the global climate regulation and its effects on local ecosystem services. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2, 324-337. Dhar, A., Naeth, M. A., Jennings, P. D., & El-Din, M. G. (2020). Perspectives on environmental impacts and a land reclamation strategy for solar and wind energy systems. Science of the Total Environment, 718, 17, Article 134602. Fagbemi, F., Oke, D. F., & Fajingbesi, A. (2023). Climate-resilient development: An approach to sustainable food production in sub-Saharan Africa. Future Foods, 7, 100216. Hasan, S. S., Zhen, L., Miah, M. G., Ahamed, T., & Samie, A. (2020). Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: A review. Environmental Development, 34, 100527. Hernandez, R. R., Hoffacker, M. K., & Field, C. B. (2014). Land-Use Efficiency of Big Solar. Environmental Science & Technology, 48(2), 1315-1323. Jeal, C., Perold, V., Seymour, C. L., Ralston-Paton, S., & Ryan, P. G. (2019). Utility-scale solar energy facilities–Effects on invertebrates in an arid environment. Journal of Arid Environments, 168, 1-8. Jin, G., Deng, X., Chu, X., Li, Z., & Wang, Y. (2017). Optimization of land-use management for ecosystem service improvement: A review. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, 101, 70-77. Kadaverugu, R., Dhyani, S., Purohit, V., Dasgupta, R., Kumar, P., Hashimoto, S., Pujari, P., & Biniwale, R. (2022). Scenario-based quantification of land-use changes and its impacts on ecosystem services: A case of Bhitarkanika mangrove area, Odisha, India. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 26(4), 30. Kikstra, J. S., Nicholls, Z. R. J., Smith, C. J., Lewis, J., Lamboll, R. D., Byers, E., Sandstad, M., Meinshausen, M., Gidden, M. J., Rogelj, J., Kriegler, E., Peters, G. P., Fuglestvedt, J. S., Skeie, R. B., Samset, B. H., Wienpahl, L., van Vuuren, D. P., van der Wijst, K. I., Al Khourdajie, A., Forster, P. M., Reisinger, A., Schaeffer, R., & Riahi, K. (2022). The IPCC Sixth Assessment Report WGIII climate assessment of mitigation pathways: from emissions to global temperatures. Geosci. Model Dev., 15(24), 9075-9109. Kong, L., Shi, Z., & Chu, L. M. (2014). Carbon emission and sequestration of urban turfgrass systems in Hong Kong. Science of the Total Environment, 473-474, 132-138. Lei, J., Chen, Y., Li, L., Chen, Z., Chen, X., Wu, T., & Li, Y. (2022). Spatiotemporal change of habitat quality in Hainan Island of China based on changes in land use. Ecological Indicators, 145, 109707. Lennan, M., & Morgera, E. (2022). The Glasgow Climate Conference (COP26). The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 37(1), 137-151. Liu, Y., Li, J., Sun, C., Wang, X., Tian, P., Chen, L., Zhang, H., Yang, X., & He, G. (2023). Thirty-year changes of the coastlines, wetlands, and ecosystem services in the Asia major deltas. Journal of Environmental Management, 326, 116675. Llodrà-Llabrés, J., & Cariñanos, P. (2022). Enhancing pollination ecosystem service in urban green areas: An opportunity for the conservation of pollinators. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 74, 127621. Loiselle, A., Proulx, R., Larocque, M., & Pellerin, S. (2023). Synergies and trade-offs among ecosystems functions and services for three types of lake-edge wetlands. Ecological Indicators, 154, 110547. Marques, S. M., Campos, F. S., David, J., & Cabral, P. (2021). Modelling Sediment Retention Services and Soil Erosion Changes in Portugal: A Spatio-Temporal Approach. Isprs International Journal of Geo-Information, 10(4), 14, Article 262. Martínez-López, J., Bagstad, K. J., Balbi, S., Magrach, A., Voigt, B., Athanasiadis, I., Pascual, M., Willcock, S., & Villa, F. (2019). Towards globally customizable ecosystem service models. Science of the Total Environment, 650, 2325-2336. Melathopoulos, A. P., Cutler, G. C., & Tyedmers, P. (2015). Where is the value in valuing pollination ecosystem services to agriculture? Ecological Economics, 109, 59-70. Millennium ecosystem assessment, M. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being (Vol. 5). Island press Washington, DC. Mulligan, M., Benıtez-Ponce, S., Lozano-V, J. S., & Sarmiento, J. L. (2015). Policy support systems for the development of benefit-sharing mechanisms for water-related ecosystem services. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Nordberg, E. J., Caley, M. J., & Schwarzkopf, L. (2021). Designing solar farms for synergistic commercial and conservation outcomes. Solar Energy, 228, 586-593. Nugroho, H. Y. S. H., Nurfatriani, F., Indrajaya, Y., Yuwati, T. W., Ekawati, S., Salminah, M., Gunawan, H., Subarudi, S., Sallata, M. K., & Allo, M. K. (2022). Mainstreaming ecosystem services from indonesia’s remaining forests. Sustainability, 14(19), 12124. Phillips, C. L., Wang, R., Mattox, C., Trammell, T. L. E., Young, J., & Kowalewski, A. (2023). High soil carbon sequestration rates persist several decades in turfgrass systems: A meta-analysis. Science of the Total Environment, 858, 159974. Piyathilake, I. D. U. H., Udayakumara, E. P. N., Ranaweera, L. V., & Gunatilake, S. K. (2022). Modeling predictive assessment of carbon storage using InVEST model in Uva province, Sri Lanka. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 8(2), 2213-2223. Raza, M. A., Yousif, M., Hassan, M., Numan, M., & Abbas Kazmi, S. A. (2023). Site suitability for solar and wind energy in developing countries using combination of GIS- AHP; a case study of Pakistan. Renewable Energy, 206, 180-191. Rennert, K., Errickson, F., Prest, B. C., Rennels, L., Newell, R. G., Pizer, W., Kingdon, C., Wingenroth, J., Cooke, R., & Parthum, B. (2022). Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature, 610(7933), 687-692. Rennert, K., Errickson, F., Prest, B. C., Rennels, L., Newell, R. G., Pizer, W., Kingdon, C., Wingenroth, J., Cooke, R., Parthum, B., Smith, D., Cromar, K., Diaz, D., Moore, F. C., Muller, U. K., Plevin, R. J., Raftery, A. E., Sevcikova, H., Sheets, H., Stock, J. H., Tan, T., Watson, M., Wong, T. E., & Anthoff, D. (2022). Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2. Nature, 610(7933), 687-+. Saraswat, S., Digalwar, A. K., Yadav, S., & Kumar, G. (2021). MCDM and GIS based modelling technique for assessment of solar and wind farm locations in India. Renewable Energy, 169, 865-884. Schenk, H. J., & Jackson, R. B. (2002). Rooting depths, lateral root spreads and below-ground/above-ground allometries of plants in water-limited ecosystems. Journal of Ecology, 90(3), 480-494. Semeraro, T., Pomes, A., Del Giudice, C., Negro, D., & Aretano, R. (2018). Planning ground based utility scale solar energy as green infrastructure to enhance ecosystem services. Energy Policy, 117, 218-227. Seok, Y., Kim, D. G., Son, J., Park, J., & Lee, J. (2022). The importance of the Mujechineup wetland for biodiversity: an evaluation of habitat quality and ecosystem service value. Landscape and Ecological Engineering, 18(4), 477-491. Sharp, R., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Wood, S., Guerry, A., Tallis, H., Ricketts, T., Nelson, E., Ennaanay, D., Wolny, S., Olwero, N., Vigerstol, K., Pennington, D., Mendoza, G., Aukema, J., Foster, J., Forrest, J., Cameron, D. R., Arkema, K., Lonsdorf, E., & Douglass, J. (2018). InVEST User’s Guide. Shriki, N., Rabinovici, R., Yahav, K., & Rubin, O. (2023). Prioritizing suitable locations for national-scale solar PV installations: Israel's site suitability analysis as a case study. Renewable Energy, 205, 105-124. Tansley, A. G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms. Ecology, 16(3), 284-307. Transforming our world : the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. (2015). 35. Turkelboom, F., Raquez, P., Dufrêne, M., Raes, L., Simoens, I., Jacobs, S., Stevens, M., De Vreese, R., Panis, J. A. E., Hermy, M., Thoonen, M., Liekens, I., Fontaine, C., Dendoncker, N., Biest, K. v. d., Casaer, J., Heyrman, H., Meiresonne, L., & Keune, H. (2013). Chapter 18 - CICES Going Local: Ecosystem Services Classification Adapted for a Highly Populated Country. In S. Jacobs, N. Dendoncker, & H. Keune (Eds.), Ecosystem Services (pp. 223-247). Elsevier. Underwood, E. C., Hollander, A. D., Safford, H. D., Kim, J. B., Srivastava, L., & Drapek, R. J. (2019). The impacts of climate change on ecosystem services in southern California. Ecosystem Services, 39, 101008. Visser, E., Perold, V., Ralston-Paton, S., Cardenal, A. C., & Ryan, P. G. (2019). Assessing the impacts of a utility-scale photovoltaic solar energy facility on birds in the Northern Cape, South Africa. Renewable Energy, 133, 1285-1294. Visser, L., AlSkaif, T., & van Sark, W. (2022). Operational day-ahead solar power forecasting for aggregated PV systems with a varying spatial distribution. Renewable Energy, 183, 267-282. Walston, L. J., Li, Y., Hartmann, H. M., Macknick, J., Hanson, A., Nootenboom, C., Lonsdorf, E., & Hellmann, J. (2021). Modeling the ecosystem services of native vegetation management practices at solar energy facilities in the Midwestern United States. Ecosystem Services, 47, 101227. Wang, W., Wang, C., & Liu, B. (2012). Effect of salinity on carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus stoichiometry during the decomposition of wetland litter. China Environmental Science, 32(9), 1683-1687. Willot, P.-A., Aubin, J., Salles, J.-M., & Wilfart, A. (2019). Ecosystem service framework and typology for an ecosystem approach to aquaculture. Aquaculture, 512, 734260. Wood, S. L., Jones, S. K., Johnson, J. A., Brauman, K. A., Chaplin-Kramer, R., Fremier, A., Girvetz, E., Gordon, L. J., Kappel, C. V., & Mandle, L. (2018). Distilling the role of ecosystem services in the Sustainable Development Goals. Ecosystem Services, 29, 70-82. Yin, C., Zhao, W., Ye, J., Muroki, M., & Pereira, P. (2023). Ecosystem carbon sequestration service supports the Sustainable Development Goals progress. Journal of Environmental Management, 330, 117155. Yuan, M.-H., & Lo, S.-L. (2020). Ecosystem services and sustainable development: Perspectives from the food-energy-water Nexus. Ecosystem Services, 46, 101217. Yuan, M.-H., Lo, S.-L., & Chiueh, P.-T. (2019). Embedding scarcity in urban water tariffs: mapping supply and demand in North Taiwan. Environmental Earth Sciences, 78, 1-13. Zhang, X., & Xu, M. (2020). Assessing the effects of photovoltaic powerplants on surface temperature using remote sensing techniques. Remote Sensing, 12(11), 1825. 朱衍臻,莊振軒,李宗翰,楊志維和黃文達. (2018). 台灣原生或本地植物之碳封存能力評估. 中華民國雜草學會會刊, 39(1), 57-70. 何恭慧,黃妤婕,林冠廷,張翊庭,郭鴻裕和潘述元. (2020). 建立農業生態系服務價值量化評估架構. Journal of Taiwan Agricultural Engineering, 66(2). 吳孟珊,(2014),生態系服務的定義與特性 。 21(5), 54-57。 李素馨,(2014),農村地景破碎化與保育:以宜蘭三星鄉農地變遷為例. 環境永續專題. 林蕙萱,錢玉蘭和林幸助,(2019),臺灣西部海岸濕地碳儲存效益. 農業經濟叢刊, 25(1), 1-26. 徐天佑,(2007),台灣地區有關太陽能日照量之環境時空因素研究探討. 環境教育學刊, 6. 黃心潔,(2020),福德坑環保復育公園生態系統服務之經濟價值分析,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所. 葛凡宇,(2022),農地污染場址再利用評估工具 : 以桃園市為例 國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所. 詹為巽,吳若穎,林俊成和邱祈榮. (2019). 森林生態系服務效益評估工具. 林業研究專訊, 26(4), 45-49. 臺灣2050淨零排放路徑及策略總說明(2022). 取自 https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DEE68AAD8B38BD76# 鄭郁蒨,(2016),瑠公圳(台大段)生態系統服務之經濟價值分析,國立臺灣大學環境工程學研究所. 內政部國土測繪中心 (2022),國土利用現況調查成果資訊專區,https://www.nlsc.gov.tw/cl.aspx?n=13705。 台灣電力公司 (2022),11年各縣市太陽光電容量因數,取自https://www.taipower.com.tw/tc/page.aspx?mid=207&cid=165&cchk=a83cd635-a792-4660-9f02-f71d5d925911。 地理資訊圖資雲服務平台 (2022),河川流域範圍,取自https://gic.wra.gov.tw/Gis/Gic/API/Google/Index.aspx。 地理資訊圖資雲服務平台 (2022),水潛勢圖_定量降雨24小時650mm,取自https://gic.wra.gov.tw/Gis/Gic/API/Google/Index.aspx。 地理資訊圖資源服務平台 (2016),臺灣20公尺網格DTM資料附錄,取自https://www.tgos.tw/TGOS/Web/MetaData/TGOS_Query_MetaData.aspx?key=TW-06-301000000A-612640。 地理資訊圖資雲服務平台 (2021),110年度全臺839子集水區範圍圖,取自https://www.tgos.tw/TGOS/Web/MetaData/TGOS_Query_MetaData.aspx 國家發展委員會 (2022),臺灣 2050 淨零排放路徑及策略總說明,取自https://www.ndc.gov.tw/Content_List.aspx?n=DEE68AAD8B38BD76#。 農業部農糧署農情報告資源網 (2023),取自https://agr.afa.g。ov.tw/afa/afa_frame.jsp。 農業部漁業署 (2021),漁業統計年報漁業生產量統計相關報表,取自https://www.fa.gov.tw/view.php?theme=FS_AR&subtheme=&id=21。 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/91191 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 近年來,全球對於氣候變遷和環境保護議題的關注逐漸增加,使得能源轉型與減少碳排放成為各國政府的首要目標之一。臺灣,作為一個高度工業化的地區,也積極參與這項轉變,除了積極推動能源結構轉型逐步減少對化石燃料的依賴,並致力於在2050年實現淨零碳排的目標。其中,太陽光電板作為清潔能源的主要來源,將在能源供應體系中扮演著重要的角色。然而,能源轉型的過程也伴隨著能源基礎設施的調整,可能對土地利用模式產生深遠的影響,進而對生態系統服務造成改變。因此,本研究的目的在於探討建置太陽光電板對生態系統服務的潛在影響。透過土地適宜性分析和生態系統服務評估,提供未來建置太陽能光電板的參考和規劃。本研究的評估方法包含兩階段,即「土地適宜性分析」和「生態系統服務模型評估」。在第一階段,納入了12項分析因子,並賦予相應的權重。接著,透過地理資訊系統(ArcGIS)進行土地適宜性分析,以選出最適合建置太陽光電板的區域作為研究範圍。在第二階段設定了四種不同的土地利用情境,並利用InVEST 生態系統服務評估工具進行評估,包括了「碳儲存」、「授粉」、「棲息地品質」以及「沉積物傳輸」四項生態系統服務。土地適宜性分析的結果顯示,在臺南37個行政區域中,白河區和楠西區由於位處山坡地,被視為最不適合建置光電板的區域;另外,有11個行政區被列為適宜建置太陽光電板的區域,最終確定七股區和將軍區為本研究的主要研究區域。生態系統服務評估的結果顯示,在太陽光電板下的土地利用轉變為原生草種時,為所有四種服務中表現較佳;然而,轉變為漁塭時,各模組與其他情境相比呈現較差結果,顯示在轉用漁塭情境下生態系統服務的損失較為明顯。最後,生態系統服務貨幣化的結果顯示,在四種生態系統服務中,原生草種的服務價值最高,其碳儲存、授粉、棲息地品質和沉積物傳輸的生態系統服務貨幣價值分別為1,705,377,780元、12,345,379,040元、201,667,803元、152,396,769元。本研究深入探討了能源轉型對土地利用和生態系統服務的影響。研究結果為未來太陽能光電板的建置和規劃提供了重要的參考,同時強調在能源轉型過程中平衡能源需求和環境保護的重要性。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | In recent years, global attention to climate change and environmental conservation issues has gradually increased, leading to energy transition and carbon emission reduction becoming one of the top priorities for governments worldwide. Taiwan, as a highly industrialized region, actively participates in this transition. In addition to promoting energy structural transformation and gradually reducing reliance on fossil fuels, Taiwan is committed to achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Among various clean energy sources, solar photovoltaic panels are expected to play a crucial role in the energy supply system.However, the process of energy transition is inevitably accompanied by adjustments to energy infrastructure, potentially causing profound impacts on land-use patterns and subsequently altering ecosystem services. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to explore the potential effects of installing solar photovoltaic panels on ecosystem services. Through land suitability analysis and ecosystem service assessment, the study aims to provide references and planning insights for future solar energy panel installations.The evaluation methodology of this study consists of two stages: "Land Suitability Analysis" and "Ecosystem Service Model Assessment." In the first stage, twelve analysis factors were considered, each assigned appropriate weights. Subsequently, using Geographic Information System (GIS), land suitability analysis was conducted to identify the most suitable regions for solar panel installation as the study area. In the second stage, four different land-use scenarios were defined, and the InVEST ecosystem service assessment tool was employed to evaluate four ecosystem services: "Carbon Storage," "Pollination," "Habitat Quality," and "Sediment Transport." The results of the land suitability analysis indicated that, among the 37 administrative regions in Tainan, Baihe District and Nansi District were deemed unsuitable due to their hilly terrain. Eleven administrative regions were identified as suitable for solar photovoltaic panel installation, with Qigu District and Jiangjun District ultimately selected as the main research areas.The results of the ecosystem service assessment showed that under the land-use transformation to native grass species beneath solar panels, all four services performed better. However, when the land-use transformation led to fishponds, the services exhibited poorer results compared to other scenarios, highlighting more pronounced losses in ecosystem services under the fishpond scenario. Finally, the monetized results of ecosystem services demonstrated that native grass species had the highest service value, with ecosystem service values for carbon storage, pollination, habitat quality, and sediment transport being 1,705,377,780 USD, 12,345,379,040 USD, 201,667,803 USD, and 152,396,769 USD, respectively.In conclusion, this study delves into the impacts of energy transition on land use and ecosystem services. The findings provide essential references for the future installation and planning of solar photovoltaic panels, emphasizing the importance of balancing energy needs and environmental conservation in the process of energy transition. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-11-28T16:11:15Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-11-28T16:11:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 II
摘要 III Abstract IV 目錄 VI 圖目錄 VIII 表目錄 X 第一章 緒論 1 1.1研究背景 1 1.2研究目的 2 第二章 文獻回顧 3 2.1生態系統服務 3 2.1.1生態系統服務與永續發展 6 2.1.2生態系統服務擁有之特徵和功能 8 2.1.3土地利用和生態系統服務 9 2.1.4太陽能光電板與生態系統服務 11 2.2生態系統服務評估方法和工具 13 2.2.1 InVEST 14 2.2.2 ARIES 16 2.3經濟價值分析 17 2.4小結 19 第三章 研究方法 20 3.1研究流程 20 3.2研究區域 21 3.3台南市土地適宜性分析 22 3.3.1土地適宜性分析因子 24 3.3.2土地適宜性分析權重 34 3.4情境分析 34 3.4.1資料前處理---土地利用分類 34 3.4.2土地利用轉變情境 36 3.5生態系統服務評估工具 38 3.5.1碳儲存(Carbon Storage and Sequestration) 38 3.5.2授粉(Pollination) 41 3.5.3棲息地品質(Habitat Quality) 42 3.5.4沉積物傳輸(Sediment Delivery Ratio) 46 3.6生態系統服務貨幣化 49 3.6.1碳儲存(Carbon Storage and Sequestration) 50 3.6.2授粉(Pollination) 52 3.6.3棲息地品質(Habitat Quality) 52 3.6.4沉積物傳輸((Sediment Delivery Ratio) 53 3.6.5糧食供給(Food Production) 53 第四章 結果與討論 54 4.1土地適宜性分析 54 4.2生態系統服務評估 56 4.2.1碳儲存(Carbon Storage and Sequestration) 56 4.2.2授粉(Pollination) 58 4.2.3棲息地品質(Habitat Quality) 60 4.2.4沉積物傳輸(Sediment Delivery Ratio) 62 4.3 生態系統服務貨幣化 65 4.4 綜合討論 66 4.4.1政策與生態系統服務的共通點 66 4.4.2政策的永續性 66 第五章 結論與建議 68 5.1結論 68 5.2建議 70 參考文獻 71 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 整合土地適宜性分析及生態系統服務評估 於太陽光電板建置之影響 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Integrating land suitability analysis and ecosystem service assessment for the impact evaluation of solar photovoltaic panel installation | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 112-1 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 袁美華;林映辰 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Mei-Hua Yuan;Ying-Chen Lin | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 能源轉型,土地利用適宜性分析,生態系統服務評估,貨幣化, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | Energy transition,Land use suitability analysis,Ecosystem services assessment,Monetization., | en |
dc.relation.page | 79 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202304334 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-10-25 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 環境工程學研究所 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 環境工程學研究所 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-112-1.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 3.87 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。