Skip navigation

DSpace

機構典藏 DSpace 系統致力於保存各式數位資料(如:文字、圖片、PDF)並使其易於取用。

點此認識 DSpace
DSpace logo
English
中文
  • 瀏覽論文
    • 校院系所
    • 出版年
    • 作者
    • 標題
    • 關鍵字
  • 搜尋 TDR
  • 授權 Q&A
  • 幫助
    • 我的頁面
    • 接受 E-mail 通知
    • 編輯個人資料
  1. NTU Theses and Dissertations Repository
  2. 生物資源暨農學院
  3. 園藝暨景觀學系
請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件: http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9065
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位值語言
dc.contributor.advisor許圳塗
dc.contributor.authorYuan-Chu Hsuen
dc.contributor.author許圓珠zh_TW
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-20T20:08:07Z-
dc.date.available2009-08-06
dc.date.available2021-05-20T20:08:07Z-
dc.date.copyright2009-08-06
dc.date.issued2009
dc.date.submitted2009-08-04
dc.identifier.citation參考文獻(References)
1. 沈再木、傅仰人、葉德銘、張維斌. 2004 台灣盆花產業之回顧與展望. 台灣花卉園藝之回顧與展望研討會. 台灣花卉園藝. 200:102-117.
2. 阮育雄. 2003.鳳梨花外銷大陸之潛力與策略. 台灣花卉園藝. 198:16-19.
3. 邱金春. 1991. 蜻蜓鳳梨(Aechmea fasciata Baker)微體繁殖之研究.中華農業研究.40(3) : 274-279.
4. 邱金春. 1991. 觀賞鳳梨組織培養繁殖褐化問題解決之道. 台灣省農業試驗所技術服務. 5:10-12.
5. 邱金春 林昭雄. 1987. 觀賞鳳梨組織培養繁殖之研究. 花卉生產改進研討會專集. p. 130-134. 桃園區農業改良場發行
6. 周邵蓮. 1989. 蜻蜓鳳梨的組織培養. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
7. 馬溯軒 王淑娥. 1977. 鳳梨之組織培養繁殖.中國園藝.23:107-113.
8. 馬溯軒 許圳塗. 1988. 植物再生與繁殖改良. 園藝作物組織培養之應用研討會專集. p.1-18. 國立台灣大學園藝系. 台北.
9. 陳柏文. 2005. 彩葉屬(Neoregelia)、鶯歌屬(Vriesea)及空氣屬(Tillandsia)觀賞鳳梨組織培養器官發生與體胚發生之研究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
10. 陳鴻吉. 2002. 觀賞鳳梨RAPD遺傳親緣性分析及擎天屬龍鳳品種之細胞培養與體胚再生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
11. 章錦瑜. 1999. 最新室內觀賞植物. 淑馨出版社. 台灣台北. p95-125.
12. 張麗慧. 2003. 玉扇鳳梨( Tillandsia cyanea )及擎天屬栽培種( Guzmznia cv. Cherry)觀賞鳳梨花器衍生癒合組織細胞懸浮培養及再生. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
13. 楊晴惠. 1999. 觀賞鳳梨組織培養不定芽再生硏究. 國立台灣大學園藝學研究所碩士論文.
14. Alves, G.M., L.L. Dal Vesco, and M.P. Guerra. 2006. Micropropagation of the Brazilian endemic bromeliad Vriesea reitzii through nodule clusters culture. Scientia Horticulturae. 110:204-207.
15. Aranda-Peres, A.N., A.P. Martinelli, L.E.P. Peres, and E.N. Higashi. 2009. Adjustment of mineral elements in the culture medium for the micropropagation of three Vriesea bromeliads from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest: The importance of calcium. Hort Science. 44:106-112.
16. Aydieh, A.A., M.K.H. Ibrahim, and A. Ibrahim. 2000. In vitro propagation and fruiting of pineapple. Egyptian Journal of Horticulture. 27:289-304.
17. Bunn, E., and K.W. Dixon. 1992. Micropropagation of the pineapple lily , Dasypogon hookeri J-Drumm. Hort Science. 27:369-369.
18. Carneiro, L.A., R.F.G. Araujo, G.J.M. Brito, M. Fonseca, A. Costa, O.J. Crocomo, and E. Mansur. 1998. In vitro regeneration from leaf explants of Neoregelia cruenta (R-Graham) LB Smith, an endemic bromeliad from Eastern Brazil. Plant Cell,Tissue and Organ Cult. 55:79-83.
19. Cueva, A., C. Espinosa, and M. Jordan. 2006. Efficient in vitro multiplication of Aechmea 'Little Harv' and Tillandsia cyanea Linden ex K. Koch. Propagation of Ornamental Plants. 6:165-169.
20. Das, T. and G.C. Mitra. 1990.Micropropagation of Eucalyptus tereticornis Smith. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Cult. 22:95-103.
21. Devi, Y.S., A. Mujib, and S.C. Kundu. 1997. Efficient regenerative potential from long term culture of pineapple. Phytomorphology. 47:255-259.
22. Droste, A., A.M. da Silva, A.V. Matos, and J.W. de Almeida. 2005. In vitro culture of Vriesea gigantea and Vriesea philippocoburgii: Two vulnerable bromeliads native to Southern Brazil. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology. 48:717-722.
23. Duranvila, N., M. Cambra, V. Medina, C. Ortega, and L. Navarro. 1989. Growth and morphogenesis of Citrus tissue-cultures infected with Citrus tristeza virus and Citrus infectious variegation virus. Phytopathology. 79:820-826.
24. Endres, L., and H. Mercier. 2003. Amino acid uptake and profile in bromeliads with different habits cultivated in vitro. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 41:181-187.
25. Escalona, M., J.C. Lorenzo, B. Gonzalez, M. Daquinta, J.L. Gonzalez, Y. Desjardins, and C.G. Borroto. 1999. Pineapple (Ananas comosus L-Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Reports. 18:743-748.
26. Feuser, S., K. Meler, M. Daquinta, M.P. Guerra, and R.O. Nodari. 2003. Genotypic fidelity of micropropagated pineapple (Ananas comosus) plantlets assessed by isozyme and RAPD markers. Plant Cell,Tiss.Organ Cult. 72:221-227.
27. Firoozabady, E., and Y. Moy. 2004. Regeneration of pineapple plants via somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant . 40:67-74.
28. Galek, R., and K. Kukulczanka. 1996. Influence of growth regulators (IBA, BA) on anatomical and morphological changes in bromeliads in vitro culture. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 65:213-219.
29. Gonzalez-Olmedo, J.L., Z. Fundora, L.A. Molina, J. Abdulnour, Y. Desjardins, and M. Escalona. 2005. New contributions to propagation of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) in temporary immersion bioreactors. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant . 41:87-90.
30. Greno, V., L. Navarro, and N. Duranvila. 1988. Influence of virus and virus-like agents on the development of Citrus buds cultured invitro. Plant Cell,Tiss.Organ Cult. 15:113-124.
31. Greno, V., M. Cambra, L. Navarro, and N. Duranvila. 1990. Effect of antiviral chemicals on the development and virus content of Citrus buds cultured invitro. Sci. Hort. 45:75-87.
32. Guerra, M.P., L.L. dal Vesco, R. Pescador, A.R. Schuelter, and R.O. Nodari. 1999. Establishment of a regenerative protocol for the pineapple micropropagation. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. 34:1557-1563.
33. Hamad, A.M., and R.M. Taha. 2008. Effect of sequential subcultures on in vitro proliferation capacity and shoot formations pattern of pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr.) over different incubation periods. Sci. Hort. 117:329-334.
34. Hasan, S.M.Z., and N.S. Abdullah. 2007. Effect of salinity on growth, proline accumulation and malate content of pineapple (Ananas comosus (L.) Merill.) under tissue culture condition. Malaysian Applied Biology. 36:57-63.
35. Hidalgo, O.B., R. Santos, R.T. Tussel, A. Pires de Matos, R.S. Cabral, M. Arzola, and M.C. Perez. 1999. Phytotoxity of Fusarium subglutinans culture filtrates on in vitro plantlets and calli of resistant and susceptible pineapple (Ananas comosus). Plant Pathology. 48:756-758.
36. Hosoki, T., and T. Asahira. 1980. Invitro-propagation of bromeliads in liquid culture. Hort Science. 15:603-604.
37. Kanashiro, S., R.D.S. Ribeiro, A.N. Goncalves, V.A. Demetrio, T. Jocys, and A.R. Tavares. 2009. Effect of calcium on the in vitro Growth of Aechmea blanchetiana (Baker) L. B. Smith Plantlets. Journal of Plant Nutrition. 32:867-877.
38. Khan, S., A. Nasib, and B.A. Saeed. 2004. Employment of in vitro technology for large scale multiplication of pineapples (Ananas comosos). Pakistan Journal of Botany. 36:611-615.
39. Kiss, E., J. Kiss, G. Gyulai, and L.E. Heszky. 1995. A novel method for rapid micropropagation of pineapple. Hort Science. 30:127-129.
40. Koh, Y.C., and F.T. Davies. 1997. Micropropagation of Cryptanthus with leaf explants with attached intercalary meristems excised from greenhouse stock plants. Scientia Horticulturae. 70:301-307.
41. Koh, Y.C., and F.T. Davies. 2001. Mutagenesis and in vitro culture of Tillandsia fasciculata Swartz var. fasciculata (Bromeliaceae). Scientia Horticulturae . 87:225-240.
42. Lin, H.-S., and Y.-S. Tsay. 2005. Studies on the combination of tissue culture and gamma ray iirradiation to induce pineapple mutations. Journal of the Chinese Society for Horticultural Science. 51:241-247.
43. Merks, O. 1977. In vitro propagation of some Tillandsioideae (Bromeliaceae) . Acta Hort. 78: 311-320.
44. Meker, O. and J. G . Van Onsem. 1983. In vitro propagation of Vriesea Cultivars in comparison with other ornamental Bromeliaceae. Acta Hort. 131:125-130.
45. Mercer, H., and G.B. Kerbauy. 1992. Invitro multiplication of Vriesea fosteriana. Plant Cell,Tiss.Organ Cult. 30:247-249.
46. Mercier, H., B.M. Souza, J.E. Kraus, R.M. Hamasaki, and B. Sotta. 2003. Endogenous auxin and cytokinin contents associated with shoot formation in leaves of pineapple cultured in vitro. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology. 15:107-112.
47. Moreira, M.A., C.B. Fraguas, J.G. de Carvalho, and M. Pasqual. 2007. Micropropagation of pineapple cv. Perola with urea as nitrogen source. Acta Scientiarum Agronomy. 29:689-693.
48. Neeta, D.S., L. George, and E. Susan. 2000.Direct regeneration of shoots from immature inflorescence cultures of turmeric. Plant Cell,Tiss.Organ Cult. 62: 235-238.
49. Nievola, C.C., J.E. Kraus, L. Freschi, B.M. Souza, and H. Mercier. 2005. Temperature determines the occurrence of CAM or C-3 photosynthesis in pineapple plantlets grown in vitro. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant. 41:832-837.
50. Nowak, E.J., and C.E. Martin. 1997. Physiological and anatomical responses to water deficits in the CAM epiphyte Tillandsia ionantha (Bromeliaceae). International Journal of Plant Sciences. 158:818-826.
51. Pasqual, M., F.C. Santos, M.A. de Figueiredo, K.P. Junqueira, J.C. de Rezende, and E.A. Ferreira. 2008. Protocol for in vitro micropropagation of ornamental pineapple. Horticultura Brasileira. 26:45-49.
52. Perez, G., E. Yanes, M. Isidron, and J.C. Lorenzo. 2009. Phenotypic and AFLP characterization of two new pineapple somaclones derived from in vitro culture. Plant Cell,Tiss.Organ Cult. 96:113-116.
53. Pickens, K.A., J.M. Affolter, H.Y. Wetzstein, and J.H.D. Wolf. 2003. Enhanced seed germination and seedling growth of Tillandsia eizii in vitro. Hort Science. 38:101-104.
54. Pickens, K.A., J. Wolf, J.M. Affolter, and H.Y. Wetzstein. 2006. Adventitious bud development and regeneration in Tillandsia eizii. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant. 42:348-353.
55. Poole, R.T., and C.A. Conover. 1976. Nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium fertilization of bromeliad, Aechmea fasciata Baker. Hort Science. 11:585-586.
56. Rech, A., L.L. Dal Vesco, and M.P. Guerra. 2009. Adventitious shoots from nodule cluster cultures of Vriesea reitzii: an endemic and endangered bromeliad from atlantic forest. Ciencia Rural. 39:909-912.
57. Rech Filho, A., L.L. Dal Vesco, R.O. Nodari, R.W. Lischka, C.V. Mueller, and M.P. Guerra. 2005. Tissue culture for the conservation and mass propagation of Vriesea reitzii Leme and Costa, a bromeliad threatened of extinction from the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Biodiversity and Conservation . 14:1799-1808.
58. Santos, M.D.M., D.G. Ribeiro, and A.C. Torres. 2008a. Adventitious shoot of ornamental pineapple under benzylaminopurine, naphthalene acetic acid and subculture period effect. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Brasileira. 43:1115-1120.
59. Santos, M.D.M., G.C.S. Buso, and A.C. Torres. 2008b. Evaluation of genetic variability in micropropagated propagules of ornamental pineapple [Ananas comosus var. bracteatus (Lindley) Coppens and Leal] using RAPD markers. Genetics and Molecular Research. 7:1097-1105.
60. Souza, B.M., J.E. Kraus, L. Endres, and H. Mercier. 2003. Relationships between endogenous hormonal levels and axillary bud development of Ananas comosus nodal segments. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry. 41:733-739.
61. Sripaoraya, S., R. Marchant, J.B. Power, and M.R. Davey. 2003. Plant regeneration by somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis in commercial pineapple (Ananas comosus L.). In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant. 39:450-454.
62. Teng, W.L. 1997. An alternative propagation method of Ananas through nodule culture. Plant Cell Reports. 16:454-457.
63. Vinterhalter, B., and D. Vinterhalter. 1994. True-to-type in-vitro propagation of Aechmea fasciata Baker. Scientia Horticulturae. 57:253-263.
64. Wang, M.L., G. Uruu, L. Xiong, X. He, C. Nagai, K.T. Cheah, J.S. Hu, G.L. Nan, B.S. Sipes, H.J. Atkinson, P.H. Moore, K.G. Rohrbach, and R.E. Paull. 2009. Production of transgenic pineapple (Ananas cosmos (L.) Merr.) plants via adventitious bud regeneration. In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology-Plant. 45:112-121.
65. Zee, F.T., and M. Munekata. 1992. In vitro storage of pineapple (Ananas-spp) germplasm. Hort Science. 27:57-58.
66. Zhang, Y.-Y., H.-J. Hsu, and W.-L. Huang. 2008. Establishment of callus induction and shoot regeneration system from axillary bud on Taiwanese edible pineapples. Taiwanese Journal of Agricultural Chemistry and Food Science. 46:49-56.
dc.identifier.urihttp://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/9065-
dc.description.abstract蠟燭鳳梨(Guzmania cv.Hercules)子房培植體接種於1/2MS添加2,4-D 0.5-2.0 mg/L組合NAA 0.5、1.0 mg/L處理中,以2,4-D 1.0 mg/L+NAA 0.5 mg/L處理可誘導產生黃色顆粒狀癒合組織,產生頻率為22.2%。此癒合組織繼代於原培養基可持續增生。將癒合組織移至含TDZ 1.0 mg/L及NAA 1.0 mg/L培養基培養兩個月後可誘導形成不定芽,每0.5公分癒合組織團塊約可產生3-6個芽體。進一步將叢生芽分切為0.5公分之芽塊繼代培養於如上之培養基,在半固態基質其增殖效果較液體培養為佳,每芽塊培植體經兩個月培養後可增生1-5個新芽體,平均增殖倍率為3.2倍。叢生芽體分切為0.5公分之芽塊移至1/2 MS+NAA 1.0 mg/L培養基,一個月後芽體抽長,可有利於芽體微扦插。以上述叢生芽分切為單芽微扦插於1/2 MS補充NAA 0.5、1.0、2.0 mg/L之培養基,兩個月後小植株高度約抽長為1-3公分並生長良好,葉片顏色鮮綠,並有黃綠色及白色的細根逐漸形成,其中以NAA 0.5 mg/L之培養基培養後生長情形較佳,發根數也較多。
國王擎天鳳梨(Guzmania cv. Carine)子房培植體接種於1/2MS組合2,4-D 1.0 mg/L、NAA 1.0 mg/L培養兩個月後可誘導產生淡黃色顆粒狀癒合組織,產生頻率為25%,該淡黃色顆粒狀癒合組織以原培養基繼代後可持續增生。
彩葉鳳梨(Neoregelia cv. Perfecta Tricolor)花瓣培植體接種於1/2 MS補充2,4-D 1.0 mg/L、1.5 mg/L、2.0 mg/L及1.5 mg/L+BA 0.5 mg/L 四處理組合中,產生頻率分別為 91.6%、83.3%、66.6%及58.3%,皆可誘導產生白色顆粒狀癒合組織,其中以2,4-D 1.0 mg/L之處理較佳。其他不同部位花器包括萼片、雄蕊、子房及花柱接種於1/2 MS組合2,4-D 1.0 mg/L +NAA 0.5 mg/L之配方,其癒合組織誘導頻率分別為25%、91.6%、75%、75%。而且所誘導之癒合組織數量亦較其他生長調節劑處理組合來的多。然而該白色癒合組織持續繼代於原培養基,其易於褐化與硬化之問題,其尚待解決。另外於2,4-D 1.5 mg/L+BA 0.5 mg/L+NAA 0.5 mg/L之處理組合,可以誘導同一花器部位培植體分別產生表面光滑之白色顆粒狀癒合組織,或表面粗糙之半透明鬆散癒合組織,或同時具有兩種形態之癒合組織。
zh_TW
dc.description.abstractThe ovary explants of Guzmania cv. Hercules were inoculated on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 2,4-D 0.5-2.0 mg/L combined NAA 0.5ぶ1.0 mg/L , the combination of 2,4-D 1.0 mg/L and NAA 0.5 mg/L was capable to induce yellow granular calli , the frequency was 22.2% . The calli were massively proliferated by serial subcultures. The callus mass were transferred on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with TDZ 1.0 mg/L+NAA 1.0 mg/L, for induction of adventitious buds , about 3-6 buds were formed from each 0.5 cm callus by 2 months after subculture . In further, the ovary-derived adventitious buds were subdivided into 0.5 cm bud blocks , then transferred to proliferation medium as above , each bud block was proliferated 1-5 shoots, the average multiplication rate was 3.2. The multiple buds were separated and transferred to cytokinin free medium for shoot elongation . The singular bud was isolated and rooted rosette plantlets were achieved on medium containing NAA 0.5 mg/L by 2 months after microculture.
The ovary explants of Guzmania cv. Carine were inoculated on 1/2 MS medium supplemented with 2,4-D 1.0 mg/L、NAA 1.0 mg/L, yellow calli were induced , the frequency was 25%, and those calli were propagated massively by subculture.
The petal explants of Neoregelia cv. Perfecta Tricolor were inoculated on 1/2MS medium added with NAA 0.5 mg/L combined with 2,4-D 1.0 mg/L、1.5 mg/L、2.0 mg/L、1.5 mg/L+BA 0.5 mg/L , the callusing frequency were 91.6%、83.3%、66.6%、58.3% , white calli were induced , and the treatment of 2,4-D 1.0 mg/L was better . The other floral organs included sepal、stamen、ovary and stigma explants were inoculated on 1/2 MS + 2,4-D 1.0 mg/L+NAA 0.5 mg/L, obtained callusing frequency were 25%、91.6%、75% and 75% respectively . But the problem of browning still needs to be resolved. Besides, when supplemented with 2,4-D 1.5 mg/L+BA 0.5 mg/L+NAA 0.5 mg/L , the translucent friable callus and white granular callus could be formation at the same time from the floral organ.
en
dc.description.provenanceMade available in DSpace on 2021-05-20T20:08:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ntu-98-R96628116-1.pdf: 4355532 bytes, checksum: 757d186239b2a2a997b39dbd7e6c0d5e (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009
en
dc.description.tableofcontents口試委員會審定書…………………………….…...….i
誌謝………………..………..…...………………….ii
縮寫字…………………………………………………iii
中文摘要………………………………………….…iv
英文摘要…………………………………………….v
壹、前言 .........................1
貳、前人研究 .....................2
觀賞鳳梨之微體繁殖…...............2
(一) 培植體種類........................... ..2
(二) 再生途徑.............................................4
(三) 品種差異與生長調節劑效應......................5
叁、 材料方法 .................................6
一、參試材料.................................6.
二、取材與消毒…………….……………………. 6
三、花器衍生癒合組織誘導試驗………………...6
四、間接不定芽誘導試驗…………………...7
五、芽體增殖試驗......................................7
(一)單芽液體培養.................................7
(二)單芽固體培養.......……………………………..……7
六、芽體健化與發根試驗..........…………………...…………..8
肆、 結果 .................................................9
一、花器衍生癒合組織誘導試驗…….…………………..9
(一)污染控制試驗…………………….….…..9
(二)花器發育程度誘導癒合組織之情形……..….….9
(三)花器衍生癒合組織誘導試驗………………..……………….9
二、 間接不定芽誘導……………………………............11
三、 次生培植體芽體增殖……………………………….11
(一)單芽體液體培養…………………………………..11
(二)單芽體固體培養………………….11
四、 芽體健化與發根……………………………………..12
伍、 討論...................40
一、花器培養污染控制試驗與培植體褐化…………………….…40
二、花器培養誘導逆分化、再分化之探討………….…41
三、次生培植體芽體增殖之探討……………………….44
四、芽體健化與植株建立…………………………….45
陸、 結語………………………………………….47
參考文獻.................................48
附錄一、擎天屬、彩葉屬觀賞鳳梨花器培養再生之流程………….56
附錄二、擎天屬蠟燭鳳梨花器培養再生流程圖..............58
dc.language.isozh-TW
dc.title彩葉屬(Neoregelia cv. Perfecta Tricolor)及擎天屬(Guzmania cv. Hercules)觀賞鳳梨花器培養再生之研究zh_TW
dc.titleThe regeneration in floral organs culture of bromeliad Neoregelia cv. Perfecta Tricolor and Guzmania cv. Hercules.en
dc.typeThesis
dc.date.schoolyear97-2
dc.description.degree碩士
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee黃怡菁,張耀乾
dc.subject.keyword觀賞鳳梨,組織培養,zh_TW
dc.subject.keywordbromeliad,tissue culture,en
dc.relation.page58
dc.rights.note同意授權(全球公開)
dc.date.accepted2009-08-04
dc.contributor.author-college生物資源暨農學院zh_TW
dc.contributor.author-dept園藝學研究所zh_TW
顯示於系所單位:園藝暨景觀學系

文件中的檔案:
檔案 大小格式 
ntu-98-1.pdf4.25 MBAdobe PDF檢視/開啟
顯示文件簡單紀錄


系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。

社群連結
聯絡資訊
10617臺北市大安區羅斯福路四段1號
No.1 Sec.4, Roosevelt Rd., Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C. 106
Tel: (02)33662353
Email: ntuetds@ntu.edu.tw
意見箱
相關連結
館藏目錄
國內圖書館整合查詢 MetaCat
臺大學術典藏 NTU Scholars
臺大圖書館數位典藏館
本站聲明
© NTU Library All Rights Reserved