請用此 Handle URI 來引用此文件:
http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90656
完整後設資料紀錄
DC 欄位 | 值 | 語言 |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | 吳紀聖 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.advisor | Jeffrey Chi-Sheng Wu | en |
dc.contributor.author | 白立旻 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.author | Limin Pai | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-03T17:02:58Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2023-11-09 | - |
dc.date.copyright | 2023-10-03 | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.date.submitted | 2023-08-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | 1. Skalska, K., J.S. Miller, and S. Ledakowicz, Trends in NOx abatement: A review. Science of the total environment, 2010. 408(19): p. 3976-3989.
2. Mitka, M., 1998 NObel Prize winners are announced: three discoverers of nitric oxide activity. Jama, 1998. 280(19): p. 1648-1648. 3. Lasek, J., Y.-H. Yu, and J.C. Wu, Removal of NOx by photocatalytic processes. Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology C: Photochemistry Reviews, 2013. 14: p. 29-52. 4. Zeldovich, Y., D. Frank-Kamenetskii, and P. Sadovnikov, Oxidation of nitrogen in combustion. 1947: Publishing House of the Acad of Sciences of USSR. 5. Fenimore, C.P. Formation of nitric oxide in premixed hydrocarbon flames. in Symposium (international) on combustion. 1971. Elsevier. 6. Normann, F., K. Andersson, B. Leckner, and F. Johnsson, Emission control of nitrogen oxides in the oxy-fuel process. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 2009. 35(5): p. 385-397. 7. Tsukahara, H., T. Ishida, and M. Mayumi, Gas-phase oxidation of nitric oxide: chemical kinetics and rate constant. Nitric Oxide, 1999. 3(3): p. 191-198. 8. Zhu, Z. and B. Xu, Purification Technologies for NOx Removal from Flue Gas: A Review. Separations, 2022. 9(10): p. 307. 9. Chaloulakou, A., I. Mavroidis, and I. Gavriil, Compliance with the annual NO2 air quality standard in Athens. Required NOx levels and expected health implications. Atmospheric Environment, 2008. 42(3): p. 454-465. 10. Srivastava, R.K., W. Neuffer, D. Grano, S. Khan, J. Staudt, and W. Jozewicz, Controlling NOx emission from industrial sources. Environmental progress, 2005. 24(2): p. 181-197. 11. Okazaki, K. and T. Ando, NOx reduction mechanism in coal combustion with recycled CO2. Energy, 1997. 22(2-3): p. 207-215. 12. Andersson, K., F. Normann, F. Johnsson, and B. Leckner, NO emission during oxy-fuel combustion of lignite. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2008. 47(6): p. 1835-1845. 13. Hong, Z., Z. Wang, and X. Li, Catalytic oxidation of nitric oxide (NO) over different catalysts: an overview. Catalysis Science & Technology, 2017. 7(16): p. 3440-3452. 14. Sun, C., N. Zhao, Z. Zhuang, H. Wang, Y. Liu, X. Weng, and Z. Wu, Mechanisms and reaction pathways for simultaneous oxidation of NOx and SO2 by ozone determined by in situ IR measurements. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2014. 274: p. 376-383. 15. Johansson, J., A. Heijnesson Hultén, S. Ajdari, P. Nilsson, M. Samuelsson, F. Normann, and K. Andersson, Gas-Phase Chemistry of the NO–SO2–ClO2 System Applied to Flue Gas Cleaning. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 2018. 57(43): p. 14347-14354. 16. Sharif, H.M.A., N. Mahmood, S. Wang, I. Hussain, Y.-N. Hou, L.-H. Yang, X. Zhao, and B. Yang, Recent advances in hybrid wet scrubbing techniques for NOx and SO2 removal: State of the art and future research. Chemosphere, 2021. 273: p. 129695. 17. Zheng, Y., L. Kovarik, M.H. Engelhard, Y. Wang, Y. Wang, F. Gao, and J.n. Szanyi, Low-temperature Pd/zeolite passive NOx adsorbers: structure, performance, and adsorption chemistry. The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, 2017. 121(29): p. 15793-15803. 18. Forzatti, P., Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis. Applied catalysis A: general, 2001. 222(1-2): p. 221-236. 19. Pârvulescu, V.I., P. Grange, and B. Delmon, Catalytic removal of NO. Catalysis Today, 1998. 46(4): p. 233-316. 20. Han, L., S. Cai, M. Gao, J.-Y. Hasegawa, P. Wang, J. Zhang, L. Shi, and D. Zhang, Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3 by Using Novel Catalysts: State of the Art and Future Prospects. Chemical Reviews, 2019. 119(19): p. 10916-10976. 21. Liu, Y., J. Zhao, and J.-M. Lee, Conventional and New Materials for Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NOx. ChemCatChem, 2018. 10(7): p. 1499-1511. 22. Ye, B., B. Jeong, M.-j. Lee, T.H. Kim, S.-S. Park, J. Jung, S. Lee, and H.-D. Kim, Recent trends in vanadium-based SCR catalysts for NOx reduction in industrial applications: stationary sources. Nano Convergence, 2022. 9(1): p. 51. 23. Liu, C., J.-W. Shi, C. Gao, and C. Niu, Manganese oxide-based catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3: A review. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2016. 522: p. 54-69. 24. Liu, Y., J. Zhao, and J.M. Lee, Conventional and New Materials for Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) of NOx. Chemcatchem, 2018. 10(7): p. 1499-1511. 25. Chen, C., Y. Cao, S. Liu, J. Chen, and W. Jia, Review on the latest developments in modified vanadium-titanium-based SCR catalysts. Chinese Journal of Catalysis, 2018. 39(8): p. 1347-1365. 26. Qi, G. and R.T. Yang, Low-temperature SCR of NO with NH3 over noble metal promoted Fe-ZSM-5 catalysts. Catalysis letters, 2005. 100: p. 243-246. 27. Li, P.P., F. Yu, M.Y. Zhu, C.J. Tang, B. Dai, and L. Dong, Selective Catalytic Reduction De-NOx Catalysts. Progress in Chemistry, 2016. 28(10): p. 1578-1590. 28. Qiao, B., A. Wang, X. Yang, L.F. Allard, Z. Jiang, Y. Cui, J. Liu, J. Li, and T. Zhang, Single-atom catalysis of CO oxidation using Pt1/FeOx. Nature chemistry, 2011. 3(8): p. 634-641. 29. Lin, J., B. Qiao, N. Li, L. Li, X. Sun, J. Liu, X. Wang, and T. Zhang, Little do more: a highly effective Pt1FeOx single-atom catalyst for the reduction of NO by H2. Chemical Communications, 2015. 51(37): p. 7911-7914. 30. He, C., Y. Wang, Y. Cheng, C.K. Lambert, and R.T. Yang, Activity, stability and hydrocarbon deactivation of Fe/Beta catalyst for SCR of NO with ammonia. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2009. 368(1-2): p. 121-126. 31. Mohan, S., P. Dinesha, and S. Kumar, NOx reduction behaviour in copper zeolite catalysts for ammonia SCR systems: A review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2020. 384: p. 123253. 32. Liu, Q., C. Bian, S. Ming, L. Guo, S. Zhang, L. Pang, P. Liu, Z. Chen, and T. Li, The opportunities and challenges of iron-zeolite as NH3-SCR catalyst in purification of vehicle exhaust. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2020. 607: p. 117865. 33. Kapteijn, F., L. Singoredjo, A. Andreini, and J.A. Moulijn, Activity and selectivity of pure manganese oxides in the selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 1994. 3(2): p. 173-189. 34. Li, Y., X. Leng, S. Ma, T. Zhang, F. Yuan, X. Niu, and Y. Zhu, Effects of Mo addition on the NH3-SCR of NO reaction over MoaMnTi10Ox (a=0.2, 0.4, 0.6 and 0.8): Synergistic action between redox and acidity. Catalysis Today, 2020. 339: p. 254-264. 35. Shi, Y., H. Yi, F. Gao, S. Zhao, Z. Xie, and X. Tang, Evolution mechanism of transition metal in NH3-SCR reaction over Mn-based bimetallic oxide catalysts: Structure-activity relationships. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 2021. 413: p. 125361. 36. Xie, A., Y. Tang, X. Huang, X. Jin, P. Gu, S. Luo, C. Yao, and X. Li, Three-dimensional nanoflower MnCrOx/Sepiolite catalyst with increased SO2 resistance for NH3-SCR at low temperature. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2019. 370: p. 897-905. 37. Forzatti, P., Present status and perspectives in de-NOx SCR catalysis. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2001. 222(1): p. 221-236. 38. Tomašić, V. and F. Jović, State-of-the-art in the monolithic catalysts/reactors. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2006. 311: p. 112-121. 39. Govender, S. and H. Friedrich, Monoliths: A Review of the Basics, Preparation Methods and Their Relevance to Oxidation. Catalysts, 2017. 7(12): p. 62. 40. Forzatti, P., D. Ballardini, and L. Sighicelli, Preparation and characterization of extruded monolithic ceramic catalysts. Catalysis Today, 1998. 41(1): p. 87-94. 41. Avila, P., M. Montes, and E.E. Miró, Monolithic reactors for environmental applications: A review on preparation technologies. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2005. 109(1): p. 11-36. 42. Meille, V., Review on methods to deposit catalysts on structured surfaces. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2006. 315: p. 1-17. 43. Nijhuis, T.A., A.E.W. Beers, T. Vergunst, I. Hoek, F. Kapteijn, and J.A. Moulijn, Preparation of monolithic catalysts. Catalysis Reviews, 2001. 43(4): p. 345-380. 44. Brinker, C.J., Dip coating, in Chemical Solution Deposition of Functional Oxide Thin Films. 2013, Springer. p. 233-261. 45. Puetz, J. and M. Aegerter, Dip coating technique. Sol-gel technologies for glass producers and users, 2004: p. 37-48. 46. Epp, J., 4 - X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques for materials characterization, in Materials Characterization Using Nondestructive Evaluation (NDE) Methods, G. Hübschen, et al., Editors. 2016, Woodhead Publishing. p. 81-124. 47. Mohammed, A. and A. Abdullah. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM): A review. in Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Hydraulics and Pneumatics—HERVEX, Băile Govora, Romania. 2018. 48. Hafner, B., Scanning electron microscopy primer. Characterization Facility, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, 2007: p. 1-29. 49. Shindo, D., T. Oikawa, D. Shindo, and T. Oikawa, Energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy. Analytical electron microscopy for materials science, 2002: p. 81-102. 50. Hodoroaba, V.-D., Chapter 4.4 - Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), in Characterization of Nanoparticles, V.-D. Hodoroaba, W.E.S. Unger, and A.G. Shard, Editors. 2020, Elsevier. p. 397-417. 51. Stevie, F.A. and C.L. Donley, Introduction to x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Journal of Vacuum Science & Technology A: Vacuum, Surfaces, and Films, 2020. 38(6): p. 063204. 52. Rickerby, D.S., A review of the methods for the measurement of coating-substrate adhesion. Surface and Coatings Technology, 1988. 36(1): p. 541-557. 53. TQC Sheen Cross Cut Adhesion Test KIT CC3000. Available from: https://industrialphysics.com/product/cross-cut-adhesion-test-kit-cc3000/. 54. International, A. Standard Test Methods for Rating Adhesion by Tape Test. 2017; Available from: https://www.pcbase.cn/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/ASTM-D3359-2017.pdf. 55. Jia, J., J. Zhou, J. Zhang, Z. Yuan, and S. Wang, The influence of preparative parameters on the adhesion of alumina washcoats deposited on metallic supports. Applied Surface Science, 2007. 253(23): p. 9099-9104. 56. Agrafiotis, C. and A. Tsetsekou, Deposition of meso-porous γ-alumina coatings on ceramic honeycombs by sol-gel methods. Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 2002. 22(4): p. 423-434. 57. Vergunst, T., F. Kapteijn, and J.A. Moulijn, Monolithic catalysts — non-uniform active phase distribution by impregnation. Applied Catalysis A: General, 2001. 213(2): p. 179-187. 58. Kim, Y.J., H.J. Kwon, I.-S. Nam, J.W. Choung, J.K. Kil, H.-J. Kim, M.-S. Cha, and G.K. Yeo, High deNOx performance of Mn/TiO2 catalyst by NH3. Catalysis Today, 2010. 151(3): p. 244-250. 59. Wu, Z., B. Jiang, and Y. Liu, Effect of transition metals addition on the catalyst of manganese/titania for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of nitric oxide with ammonia. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2008. 79(4): p. 347-355. 60. Qi, G. and R.T. Yang, Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over iron and manganese oxides supported on titania. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2003. 44(3): p. 217-225. 61. Xu, C., J. Liu, Z. Zhao, F. Yu, K. Cheng, Y. Wei, A. Duan, and G. Jiang, NH3-SCR denitration catalyst performance over vanadium–titanium with the addition of Ce and Sb. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2015. 31: p. 74-80. 62. Kobayashi, M., R. Kuma, S. Masaki, and N. Sugishima, TiO2-SiO2 and V2O5/TiO2-SiO2 catalyst: Physico-chemical characteristics and catalytic behavior in selective catalytic reduction of NO by NH3. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 2005. 60(3): p. 173-179. 63. Hugenschmidt, M., K. Adrion, A. Marx, E. Müller, and D. Gerthsen, Electron-Beam-Induced Carbon Contamination in STEM-in-SEM: Quantification and Mitigation. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 2022. 29(1): p. 219-234. 64. Zhu, Y., G. Lv, C. Song, B. Li, Y. Zhu, Y. Liu, W. Zhang, and Y. Wang, Optimization of the Washcoat Slurry for Hydrotalcite-Based LNT Catalyst. Catalysts, 2019. 9(8): p. 696. 65. Sun, X., R.T. Guo, J. Liu, Z.G. Fu, S.W. Liu, W.G. Pan, X. Shi, H. Qin, Z.Y. Wang, and X.Y. Liu, The enhanced SCR performance of Mn/TiO2 catalyst by Mo modification: Identification of the promotion mechanism. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2018. 43(33): p. 16038-16048. 66. Wang, X., H.-Y. Chen, and W.M.H. Sachtler, Mechanism of the Selective Reduction of NOx over Co/MFI: Comparison with Fe/MFI. Journal of Catalysis, 2001. 197(2): p. 281-291. 67. Zhang, D., Z. Ma, B. Wang, T. Zhu, D. Weng, X. Wu, J. Chen, H. Wang, G. Li, and J. Zhou, Effect of manganese and/or ceria loading on V2O5–MoO3/TiO2 NH3 selective catalytic reduction catalyst. Journal of Rare Earths, 2020. 38(7): p. 725-734. 68. Huang, L., Y. Zeng, Y. Gao, H. Wang, Y. Zong, Z. Chang, S. Zhang, P. Han, and Y. Yu, Promotional effect of phosphorus addition on improving the SO2 resistance of V2O5-MoO3/TiO2 catalyst for NH3-SCR of NO. Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 2022. 163: p. 110566. 69. Qiu, Y., B. Liu, J. Du, Q. Tang, Z. Liu, R. Liu, and C. Tao, The monolithic cordierite supported V2O5–MoO3/TiO2 catalyst for NH3-SCR. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2016. 294: p. 264-272. 70. Zhang, S. and Q. Zhong, Promotional effect of WO3 on O2− over V2O5/TiO2 catalyst for selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, 2013. 373: p. 108-113. 71. Svachula, J., N. Ferlazzo, P. Forzatti, E. Tronconi, and F. Bregani, Selective reduction of nitrogen oxides (NOx) by ammonia over honeycomb selective catalytic reduction catalysts. Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 1993. 32(6): p. 1053-1060. 72. Yang, J., H. Ma, Y. Yamamoto, J. Yu, G. Xu, Z. Zhang, and Y. Suzuki, SCR catalyst coated on low-cost monolith support for flue gas denitration of industrial furnaces. Chemical engineering journal, 2013. 230: p. 513-521. 73. Nahavandi, M., SELECTIVE CATALYTIC REDUCTION (SCR) OF NO BY AMMONIA OVER V2O5/TiO2 CATALYST IN A CATALYTIC FILTER MEDIUM AND HONEYCOMB REACTOR: A KINETIC MODELING STUDY. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 2015. 32. 74. Mytareva, A.I., D.A. Bokarev, D.S. Krivoruchenko, G.N. Baeva, A.Y. Belyankin, and A.Y. Stakheev, Improvement of Low-Temperature Activity of FeBeta Monolith Catalyst in NH3-SCR of NOx. Topics in Catalysis, 2019. 62(1-4): p. 86-92. 75. Jiang, B., Z. Li, and S.-c. Lee, Mechanism study of the promotional effect of O2 on low-temperature SCR reaction on Fe–Mn/TiO2 by DRIFT. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2013. 225: p. 52-58. 76. Qi, G.S. and R.T. Yang, Low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3 over iron and manganese oxides supported on titania. Applied Catalysis B-Environmental, 2003. 44(3): p. 217-225. 77. Nasello, N.D., F. Gramigni, I. Nova, E. Tronconi, F. Hofmann, S. Dieterich, M. Crocoll, and M. Weibel, Transient Redox Behavior of a NH3-SCR Cu-CHA SCR Catalyst: Effect of O2 Feed Content Variation. Topics in Catalysis, 2022. 78. Koebel, M. and M. Elsener, Selective catalytic reduction of NO over commercial DeNOx-catalysts: experimental determination of kinetic and thermodynamic parameters. Chemical Engineering Science, 1998. 53(4): p. 657-669. | - |
dc.identifier.uri | http://tdr.lib.ntu.edu.tw/jspui/handle/123456789/90656 | - |
dc.description.abstract | 隨著工業的發展,氮氧化物的排放量日益增加,為了降低氮氧化物對人類和環境的危害,各國制定了更嚴格的法規限制氮氧化物(NOx)的排放。工廠尾氣處理中最常使用的脫硝技術為選擇性催化還原法(Selective Catalytic Reduction, SCR),利用NH3與NO反應成無害的N2。由於尾氣流速高、含有飛灰,需使用蜂巢式觸媒(honeycomb)降低壓降及增加機械強度。本研究旨在探討SCR蜂巢式觸媒的製備與鑑定。將SCR觸媒的載體TiO2覆膜於蜂巢式載體上,接著含浸活性金屬上去。TiO2覆膜溶液組成最適化,並探討乾燥方法和蜂巢前處理對覆膜附著力的影響,發現NaOH前處理和慢速乾燥能大幅提升覆膜的附著力符合工業上的標準。
TiO2本身沒有脫硝活性,本研究以Mn為活性基,運用含浸法負載20%Mn於已覆膜TiO2的蜂巢式載體上。測試並比較五種不同乾燥方法對金屬分布的影響,分別為烘箱乾燥、室溫乾燥、強制對流乾燥、冷凍乾燥和覆膜溶液加polyethylene glycol(PEG)乾燥。結果發現烘箱乾燥、室溫乾燥、強制對流乾燥金屬分布不均,冷凍乾燥金屬分布均勻但觸媒附著力變差,而PEG乾燥金屬分布均勻且保有附著力。脫硝活性結果顯示經PEG乾燥的蜂巢式觸媒比起烘箱乾燥擁有更高的活性。本研究也比較了蜂巢式觸媒和粉末觸媒的活性差異,發現在相同Gas Hourly Space Velocity (GHSV)的反應條件下,蜂巢式觸媒因為大部分皆為無活性的材質,活性很低。然而若在相同Weight Hourly Space Velocity(WHSV)的反應條件下,蜂巢式觸媒擁有與粉末觸媒近似的活性。蜂巢式觸媒的元素組成亦與粉末觸媒有些不同,蜂巢式觸媒的Mn負載量及Mn4+含量較少。 工業中常用的觸媒之一為耐硫抗水的釩鈦觸媒,因此本研究也製備並測試MnPVMo/TiO2/蜂巢,結果在200 ℃、[NO] = 200 ppm、[NH3] = 200 ppm、[SO2] = 100 ppm、[H2O] = 13%的反應條件下能達到45%的NO轉化率。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The emission of nitrogen oxides (NOx) increases gradually due to the development of industry. In order to reduce harmful NOx, most countries have enacted stricter laws to limit the emission of NO. Selective Catalytic Reduction (SCR) is the most commonly used denitrification unit in the industry for tail gas treatment. NH3 is applied to reduce NO to harmless N2 selectively. Due to the high gas flow rate and fly ash in the exhaust, a honeycomb catalyst is needed to decrease the pressure drop and improve the mechanical strength. This study aims to investigate the preparation and characterization of SCR honeycomb catalysts. The SCR catalysts with active metals were impregnated on the layer of TiO2 which was coated on the honeycomb. The composition of the TiO2 coating solution was optimized, and the influence of the drying procedures and honeycomb pretreatments on the adhesion of the coating was studied. NaOH pretreatment of honeycomb and slow drying rate can greatly improve the adhesion of the coating to meet the requirement of the industry standard.
Pure TiO2 shows no de-NOx activity. In this study, Mn was used as the active component. 20% Mn was loaded on the honeycomb carrier, which was covered with TiO2 layer by the impregnation method. Influence of five different drying methods on metal distribution was evaluated and compared, that is, drying in an oven, drying under room temperature, drying by forced flow, drying by freeze drying, and drying with additional polyethylene glycol (PEG) in coating solution. We found that metals were unevenly distributed by drying in an oven, drying under room temperature, and drying by forced flow. Freeze drying showed even metal distribution but the adhesion of catalyst is poor. The catalyst on the honeycomb by drying with additional PEG gave evenly distributed metal and maintained strong adhesion. The result of de-NOx activity showed that the honeycomb catalyst by additional PEG drying procedure had higher activity than that by oven drying. This study also compared the activity difference between the honeycomb and the powder catalyst and found that under the same Gas Hourly Space Velocity (GHSV) conditions, the honeycomb catalyst showed much lower activity because the honeycomb consists of inactive materials. If the reaction is based on the same Weight Hourly Space Velocity (WHSV) conditions, the honeycomb catalyst gave similar activity to the powder catalyst. The element composition of the honeycomb catalyst was slightly different from that of the powder catalyst. The Mn loading and Mn4+ content on the honeycomb catalyst was less than that of the powder catalyst. One of the catalysts commonly used in industry is sulfur and water resistant vanadium-titanium catalyst. This study also prepared and tested MnPVMo/TiO2/honeycomb and found that NO conversion achieved 45% under the reaction conditions on 200°C, [NO] = 200 ppm, [NH3] = 200 ppm, [SO2] = 100 ppm, and [H2O] = 13%. | en |
dc.description.provenance | Submitted by admin ntu (admin@lib.ntu.edu.tw) on 2023-10-03T17:02:58Z No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.provenance | Made available in DSpace on 2023-10-03T17:02:58Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 | en |
dc.description.tableofcontents | 誌謝 i
中文摘要 ii ABSTRACT iv CONTENTS vi LIST OF FIGURES x LIST OF TABLES xiv 第 1 章 緒論 1 1.1 研究背景 1 1.2 研究動機 1 1.3 研究目的 1 第 2 章 文獻探討 3 2.1 氮氧化物的介紹 3 2.1.1 氮氧化物的基本性質 3 2.1.2 氮氧化物生成機制 3 2.1.3 氮氧化物的危害 5 2.2 氮氧化物脫除技術 6 2.2.1 初級方法 6 2.2.2 次級方法 9 2.3 選擇性觸媒還原(SCR) 13 2.3.1 SCR發展簡史 13 2.3.2 SCR化學反應 13 2.3.3 常見SCR觸媒介紹 15 2.3.4 工業中的SCR系統 18 2.4 蜂巢式觸媒(Honeycomb catalyst) 20 2.5 浸漬覆膜法(Dip coating) 24 第 3 章 研究方法與步驟 26 3.1 實驗藥品與儀器設備介紹 26 3.1.1 實驗藥品 26 3.1.2 實驗氣體 26 3.1.3 儀器設備 27 3.2 蜂巢式載體製備 28 3.2.1 蜂巢式載體尺寸 28 3.2.2 TiO2覆膜液製備 29 3.2.3 蜂巢式載體鹼性前處理 29 3.2.4 浸漬覆膜法 30 3.2.5 金屬含浸 31 3.3 脫硝反應系統 34 3.3.1 反應系統一 34 3.3.2 反應系統二 35 3.3.3 實驗數據計算方式 36 3.4 觸媒和覆膜性質鑑定原理介紹 37 3.4.1 X光繞射儀 37 3.4.2 場發式掃描式電子顯微鏡 40 3.4.3 能量散佈光譜儀 42 3.4.4 BET比表面積測量儀 43 3.4.5 X光光電子能譜儀 44 3.4.6 薄膜測厚儀 46 3.4.7 附著力測試 47 第 4 章 觸媒與覆膜性質分析與討論 50 4.1 蜂巢式載體覆膜 50 4.1.1 覆膜成分、乾燥方法和前處理對附著力的影響 50 4.1.2 覆膜次數對擔載量的影響 54 4.2 乾燥方法對蜂巢式載體內金屬分布的影響 55 4.3 XRD結晶繞射分析 58 4.3.1 Mn/TiO2 58 4.3.2 0.5Mn0.5P5V5Mo/TiO2 59 4.4 場發射掃描式電子顯微分析 60 4.5 能量散佈光譜儀 61 4.6 BET 比表面積分析 67 4.7 X光光電子能譜儀分析 67 4.7.1 20Mn/TiO2 67 4.7.2 0.5Mn0.5P5V5Mo/TiO2 71 4.8 表面膜厚分析 73 4.8.1 SEM 73 4.8.2 Profilometer 74 4.8.3 覆膜厚度理論計算 75 4.8.4 綜合比較與討論 76 第 5 章 蜂巢式載體活性結果與討論 78 5.1 20Mn/TiO2/HC脫硝活性測試 78 5.1.1 蜂巢式載體活性與空白測試 78 5.1.2 蜂巢式載體與顆粒觸媒脫硝活性比較 80 5.1.3 恆溫脫硝活性測試 82 5.1.4 金屬分布對脫硝活性的影響 82 5.2 GHSV、NO濃度、NH3/NO比與O2濃度對脫硝活性的影響 84 5.2.1 GHSV 84 5.2.2 NO濃度 85 5.2.3 NH3/NO進料比 85 5.2.4 動力學分析 88 5.2.5 O2濃度 87 5.3 0.5Mn0.5P5V5Mo/TiO2/HC活性測試 88 第 6 章 結論與未來展望 91 參考文獻 93 附錄 100 個人小傳 101 | - |
dc.language.iso | zh_TW | - |
dc.title | 選擇性催化還原脫硝蜂巢式觸媒的製備和鑑定 | zh_TW |
dc.title | Preparation and Characterization of Honeycomb Catalyst for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NO | en |
dc.type | Thesis | - |
dc.date.schoolyear | 111-2 | - |
dc.description.degree | 碩士 | - |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | 游文岳;郭奐廷 | zh_TW |
dc.contributor.oralexamcommittee | Wen-Yueh Yu;Huan-Ting Guo | en |
dc.subject.keyword | 氮氧化物,選擇性觸媒還原,蜂巢式反應器,二氧化鈦,脫硝,浸漬覆膜, | zh_TW |
dc.subject.keyword | NOx,selective catalytic reduction,honeycomb reactor,TiO2,de-NOx,dip coating, | en |
dc.relation.page | 101 | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.6342/NTU202303246 | - |
dc.rights.note | 同意授權(限校園內公開) | - |
dc.date.accepted | 2023-08-10 | - |
dc.contributor.author-college | 工學院 | - |
dc.contributor.author-dept | 化學工程學系 | - |
顯示於系所單位: | 化學工程學系 |
文件中的檔案:
檔案 | 大小 | 格式 | |
---|---|---|---|
ntu-111-2.pdf 目前未授權公開取用 | 4.69 MB | Adobe PDF | 檢視/開啟 |
系統中的文件,除了特別指名其著作權條款之外,均受到著作權保護,並且保留所有的權利。